+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Geoff Ley

Geoff Ley

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: vlabrague6426
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 23

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    1/23

    Multidimensional Poverty

    in the Philippines: Trend,

    Patterns, and Determinants

    Geoffrey Ducanes and Arsenio Balisacan

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    2/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Philippines

    There is government awareness that focusshould be on povertys many aspects notjust income poverty

    This is evident in the Medium-term PhilippineDevelopment Plan of every president since1992 which refers to human development goalsand not just income poverty targets.

    Due mainly to effective lobbying by NGOs likethe Human Development Network

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    3/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Philippines

    e.g. KALAHI-CIDSS

    acronym for current governments flagship

    poverty project (roughly translatable to Arm-in-arm Against Poverty)

    involves funding support for likes of road,

    water, health and day care projects forselected

    towns/municipalities

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    4/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Philippines

    e.g. KALAHI-CIDSS

    steps in town selection

    1. Choosing 20 poorest provinces out of 78 total in

    terms of official income poverty

    2. Within each of these 20 provinces, choosingeligible municipalities based on a composite indexof income level, food consumption, clothing

    consumption, quality of shelter, disastervulnerability, and citizen participation

    3. etc.

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    5/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Philippines

    Still, the literature in the country on

    multidimensional poverty is lagging

    compared to income poverty. Two mainreasons

    Income poverty, rightly or wrongly, is seen to

    be the more pressing problem. Justification for

    this may take the following form, for instance.

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    6/23

    Income poverty more pressing?

    Indicator Philippines

    Medium human

    development

    countries

    % difference

    Per capita GDP 4,170 4,269 -2.3

    Adult literacy 92.6 80.4 15.2

    Combinedenrollment ratio

    81 64 26.6

    Life expectancy 69.8 67.2 3.9

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    7/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Philippines

    Data constraints. Many important non-income

    indicators such as literacy rates, mortality rates,

    life expectancy, and nutrition status of children,

    access to health and education facilities areobtained either at long intervals of timeor

    irregularly

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    8/23

    Data frequency

    Life expectancy every 10 years

    Infant mortality every 10 years

    Literacy

    survey held twice in last

    15 years, with definition

    changing

    Nutrition

    held thrice in last 15

    years by different

    agencies

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    9/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Measurement

    Multidimensional indices have been constructed atthe level ofprovinces. Important particularly inmaking local leaders and the people more

    accountable for their performance.HDIreal per capita income, primary and secondaryenrolment rate, high school graduate ratio, and lifeexpectancy

    HPIprobability at birth of not surviving to age 40,functional illiteracy rate, % not using improved watersources, and % of underweight children under 5

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    10/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Measurement

    Quality of Life Index (QLI) under-5 nutrition rate,

    attended births, elementary cohort survival rate,

    Minimum Basic Needs Index (MBN)

    # of families

    below the official poverty line (n), incidence of official

    poverty in the province (%), cohort non-survival rate

    (%), population illiteracy rate (%), infant mortality

    rate (per 1,000 livebirths), malnutrition rate (%),households without access to safe water (%),

    households with no sanitary toilets (%)

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    11/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Measurement

    Table 1. Spearman's Rank Correlations of Provincial Welfare Measures*

    Indicator HDI HPI GRDIMBN'Index

    QLIFLOL

    povertyincidence**

    Officialpoverty

    incidence***

    HDI 1 . . . . . .

    HPI -0.53 1 . . . . .

    GRDI 0.98 -0.57 1 . . . .

    MBN' Index 0.62 -0.76 0.65 1 . . .

    QLI 0.65 -0.66 0.68 0.78 1 . .

    FLOLpovertyincidence**

    -0.84 0.39 -0.83 -0.59 -0.53 1

    .

    Officialpovertyincidence***

    -0.80 0.55 -0.81 -0.77 -0.65 0.74 1

    *Using provincial level data as unit of analysis**Uses fixed-level-of-living poverty lines and per capita expenditure***Uses government computed poverty lines and per capita income

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    12/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Measurement

    Table 2. No. of provinces identified in common among 20 poorest

    Indicator HDI HPIMBN'Index

    QLIFLOL

    poverty

    incidence

    Incomepoverty

    incidence

    HDI 20 . . . . .

    HPI 12 20 . . . .

    MBN' Index 12 13 20 . . .

    QLI 10 10 9 20 . .

    FLOLpovertyincidence 13 9 9 6 20 .

    Incomepovertyincidence 15 11 10 8 11 20

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    13/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Measurement

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    14/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - PatternsTable 3. Regional Welfare Indicators (2000)*

    Region**HDI

    (2000)HPI

    (2000)GRDI(2000)

    MBN'Index(1994)

    QLI(1999)

    FLOLPoverty

    Incidence***(2000)

    IncomePoverty

    Incidence****(2000)

    CAR 0.620 19.5 0.574 0.57 0.71 20.1 44.2

    1 0.639 12.8 0.602 0.72 0.8 20.2 43.7

    2 0.567 14.7 0.539 0.72 0.78 29.6 36.2

    3 0.634 11.7 0.591 0.73 0.78 16.4 23.0

    NCR 0.830 9.6 0.732 . . 5.6 12.1

    4A 0.669 12.1 0.621 0.77 0.78 14.7 24.8

    4B 0.535 15.3 0.51 0.64 0.59 39.2 60.2

    5 0.523 17.8 0.503 0.56 0.59 49.7 62.9

    6 0.587 20 0.552 0.59 0.6 28.1 51.5

    7 0.563 17.7 0.537 0.67 0.75 39.3 44.0

    8 0.519 18.4 0.495 0.61 0.60 46.8 51.6

    9 0.530 23.6 0.505 0.47 0.61 49.0 54.9

    10 0.606 16.6 0.558 0.59 0.71 31.2 49.3

    11 0.594 21.7 0.553 0.58 0.59 23.1 45.0

    12 0.569 20.5 0.538 0.51 0.57 32.5 59.2

    13 0.520 17.4 0.499 0.54 0.59 33.9 56.7

    ARMM 0.395 31.1 0.381 0.37 0.55 58.9 72.6

    *Regional figures are population-weighted averages of provincial figures in Appendix Table 1.**CARCordillera Administrative Region; NCRNational Capital Region; ARMMAutonomous Region of

    Muslim Mindanao***Based on fixed level of living poverty lines and per capita expenditure.****Based on per capita income

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    15/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Patterns

    The most glaring pattern is that regardless ofwhich welfare indicator is usedProvinces (or regions) adjacent to and including Metro

    Manila, the countrys capital, have the most favorablelevels, almost without exception

    The provinces in one region, the Autonomous Regionof Muslim Mindanao, performs most poorly in almostall indicators. This is the region where majority of the

    countrys Muslim population is found and the base of along standing armed conflict between secessionistgroups and the government.

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    16/23

    Multidimensional Poverty - Determinants

    We examine multidimensional poverty in relation to

    a. geographical/topographical factors,

    b. infrastructure, andc. political economy variables

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    17/23

    Geographical/topographical factors

    Climate and topography, for instance, affect livelihoodpatterns, food production, and shelter ,

    Climate is also intimately related with disease burdens

    (such malaria in tropical areas, meningitis in mountainousareas) and health

    Difficult terrain, as well as frequent inclement weatheralso makes childrens access to school more grueling.

    In our regressions, geography is represented by dummies forclimate type, as well as a dummy for whether a province is

    predominantly mountainousand a dummy if it is coastal.

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    18/23

    Infrastructure

    Infrastructure facilitates trade and travel, raising incomelevels

    Infrastructure, say in the form of a good road network also

    facilitates the construction of, and transport to, furtherinfrastructure such as markets, school buildings, andhealth centers.

    Infrastructure is represented by road densityand an indicator

    variable for thepresence of international portsin theprovince. In addition, thepopulation density, which is closelylinked to the level of urbanization in an area, is included as anadditional proxy infrastructure variable.

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    19/23

    Political economy variables

    Good governance, for instance, should lead to betterwelfare for the constituents

    The presence of armed conflict in an area, insofar as it

    represents a direct threat to life and health, impedes accessto education and health facilities, and represents a grave

    psychological burden, should be detrimental to well-being.

    As measures of good governance, we include a measure for the

    extent of local political dynasty and also provincialper capitabudget expenditure on education. To represent conflict, weinclude a dummy forsignificantpresence of communistarmed insurgence(CPP-NPA) in the area and also a dummyfor theAutonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao, ahistorically contentious region and the main base of Musliminsurgents.

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    20/23

    Regression ResultsTable 4. Regression Results

    HDI 2000 HPI 2000

    Variable Coeff p-value Coeff p-value

    Climate type 2 -0.08 0.00 *** 1.86 0.25

    Climate type 3 -0.05 0.01 *** 3.48 0.02 **

    Climate type 4 -0.07 0.00 *** 4.18 0.01 ***

    Mountainous 0.01 0.80 0.58 0.59

    Coastal 0.01 0.56 1.35 0.45

    International port 0.01 0.69 0.20 0.86

    Road density 1990 0.02 0.54 -4.64 0.02 **

    Population density 1990 (000) 0.16 0.01 *** -2.05 0.44

    Dynasty -0.06 0.02 ** 1.04 0.65

    Educ expend per capita (P000) 0.04 0.17 0.00 0.80Communist insurgency -0.02 0.16 2.44 0.06 *

    ARMM -0.15 0.00 *** 18.57 0.00 ***

    Intercept 0.55 0.00 16.32 0.00

    No. of observations 72 72

    R2 0.673 0.668

    *significant at the 10% level; **significant at the 5% level;***significant at the 1% level

    ****Regressions were done in Stata 8 using the robust method, which uses Whites adjusted standard errorestimates. Diagnostic tests on multicollinearity, omitted variables, and normality of residuals were made andexcept in the case of the normality of residuals in the HDI regression, all were passed at the 5% level.

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    21/23

    Regression ResultsTable 4. Regression Results

    MBN 1994 QLI 1999

    Variable Coeff p-value Coeff p-value

    Climate type 2 -0.09 0.00 *** -0.05 0.08 *

    Climate type 3 -0.09 0.00 *** -0.07 0.01 **

    Climate type 4 -0.11 0.00 *** -0.06 0.07 *

    Mountainous -0.02 0.48 -0.04 0.03 **

    Coastal -0.08 0.01 *** 0.04 0.15

    International port 0.08 0.03 ** 0.05 0.02 **

    Road density 1990 0.05 0.19 0.14 0.00 ***

    Population density 1990 (000) 0.17 0.01 ** 0.12 0.02 **

    Dynasty -0.09 0.08 * -0.03 0.30

    Educ expend per capita (P000) 0.29 0.01***

    0.29 0.05*Communist insurgency -0.04 0.08 * -0.02 0.21

    ARMM -0.22 0.00 *** -0.09 0.00 ***

    Intercept 0.57 0.00 0.56 0.00

    No. of observations 72 72

    R2 0.70 0.79

    *significant at the 10% level; **significant at the 5% level;***significant at the 1% level****Regressions were done in Stata 8 using the robust method, which uses Whites adjusted standard errorestimates. Diagnostic tests on multicollinearity, omitted variables, and normality of residuals were made andall were passed at the 5% level.

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    22/23

    Regression Results

    Regression results show in the case of Philippine provinces

    Geography, infrastructure, and political factors arerobustly related to multidimensional welfare levels.

    For policy, geographical features maybe made one basisfor targeting, although a closer study must be made totrace the exact path/paths through which geographicalfactors are transmitted to welfare levels, and then designinterventions appropriately.

    Infrastructure investment, good governance, and a quickand peaceful resolution to the armed conflicts must all be

    pursued to improve multidimensional welfare in thelagging provinces.

  • 8/13/2019 Geoff Ley

    23/23

    End


Recommended