52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE010
GEOPHYSICAL REPORTHERONTRACK LAKE PROPERTY, ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO
THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION, NTS 52G/3FOR
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INCBY
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD
DEC. 5,1998. GRANT A. HENDRICKSON, P.GEO.
GEOPHYSICAL REPORT
HERONTRACK LAKE PROPERTY, ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO
THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION
NTS 52G/3
FOR
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC
BY
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD
DECEMBER 5, 1998. GRANT A. HENDRICKSON, P.GEO.
52G03SW2004 2.19091
TABLE OF CONTENTSNORWAY LAKE 010C
Introduction
Location Map ..
Claim Maps
Personnel
Equipment
Data Presentation
Reduced Induced Polarization Plan ..
Reduced Resistivity Plan
Survey Procedure
Discussion of the Data
Conclusions and Recommendations ..
Statement of Qualifications ..
References
APPENDIX:
Induced Polarization Plan, 2600m ABResistivity Plan, 2600m AB ,.Induced Polarization/Resistivity Profiles, 2600m ABPosted Induced Polarization Data, 2600m ABPosted Resistivity Data, 2600m AB ..Induced Polarization Section, L.2700E, South Side ..Induced Polarization Section, L.2700E, South Side, Posted DataResistivity Section, L.2700E, South SideResistivity Data, L.2700E, South Side, Posted Data ..Induced Polarization Section, L.2700E, North Side ..Induced Polarization Section, L.2700E, North Side, Posted DataResistivity Section, L.2700E, North SideResistivity Section, L.2700E, North Side, Posted Data
Pages 1-2.
Fig.#l.
Figs. #2a, 2b.
Page 3.
Page 3.
Pages 4-5
Fig. #3R.
Fig. #4R.
Pages 6-7.
Pages 8-13.
Pages 14-15.
Page 16.
Page 17.
Fig. #3. Fig. #4. Fig. #5. Fig. #6a. Fig. #6b. Fig. #7a. Fig. #7b. Fig. #8a. Fig. #8b. Fig. #9a. Fig. #9b. Fig. #10a. Fig. #10b.
Induced Polarization Section, L.2800E, North Side .. .. .. Fig. #1 la.Induced Polarization Section, L.2800E, North Side, Posted Data .. Fig. #1 Ib.Resistivity Section, L.2800E, North Side .. .. .. .. Fig. #12a.Resistivity Section, L.2800E, North Side, Posted Data .. .. Fig. #12b.Induced Polarization Section, L.3000E, South Side .. .. .. Fig. #13a.Induced Polarization Section, L.3000E, South Side, Posted Data .. Fig. #13b.Resistivity Section, L.3000E, South Side .. .. .. .. Fig. #14a.Resistivity Section, L.3000E, South Side, Posted Data .. .. Fig. #14b.Induced Polarization Section, L.3000E, North Side .. .. .. Fig. #15a.Induced Polarization Section, L.3000E, North Side, Posted Data .. Fig. #15b.Resistivity Section, L.3000E, North Side .. .. .. .. Fig. #16a.Resistivity Section, L.3000E, North Side, Posted Data .. .. Fig. #\ 6b.
INTRODUCTION
At the request of Atikokan Resources Inc., Delta Geoscience Ltd has conducted
ground geophysical surveys on the Herontrack property. This exploration property is
prospective for zinc, silver, and copper mineralization. The property lies well within an
extensive series of claims held by Atikokan to cover a sequence of felsic volcanic rocks
(see Figs. #2a, 2b). These volcanics are part of the Lumby Lake greenstone belt, which
itself is part of the Archean Superior Province. The location map, Fig. #1, illustrates the
property location relative to the map of western Ontario.
Several discussions with Ray Bernatchez, P.Eng., the president of Atikokan
Resources, and his geological consultant Chris Staargaard, P.Geo., prior to the
commencement of geophysical surveying, had established that the strongest hydrothermal
alteration and chloritization was in the felsic sequence between Lumby and Spoon Lakes.
The excellent felsic volcanics geology, when considered in conjunction with Atikokan's
recent discovery of significant silver, zinc, copper mineralization, contained within
several thin sulphide horizons on the immediate west shore of Herontrack Lake, provided
a focus and starting point for the deep looking geophysical surveys now being discussed
within this report.
Geological reports suggested the abovementioned significant mineralization is
distal. This possibility and the fact that the whole area has in the past been the focus for
relatively deep-looking (175m) airborne electromagnetic surveys (INPUT flown by the
Ontario government) suggested the need for a much more deeply focused ground
geophysical survey. The property's excellent geology strongly encouraged this
exploration approach.
In deep exploration work, it's generally best to exploit the largest areal physical
property change. In the search for a centre of sulphide deposition, i.e. a feeder zone, it's
the increased sulphide mineralization and alteration that one should focus on, therefore
Delta Geoscience conducted this deeply focused (450m) Induced Polarization/Resistivity
survey. The gradient array (2600 AB) was chosen since it provides a deep depth of
investigation in conjunction with excellent horizontal resolution. This array also allows
for rapid cost effective surveying. The significant anomalies found by this survey were
detailed by smaller gradient arrays, to provide the information necessary to conduct
Induced Polarization and Resistivity depth sections.
The survey area is quite typical of western Ontario, with only moderate
topographic relief. Much of the survey area had been clear-cut approximately eight years
ago and the new growth is quite thick in some areas.
A good network of logging roads provided excellent vehicle access to the centre
of the grid.
Although this survey started in good fall weather, this quickly deteriorated. A
major low-pressure system crossed over the area, which resulted in very strong winds and
an ice storm, followed by two heavy snowfalls. The strong winds, in conjunction with
trees heavily laden with ice and snow, created a huge amount of windfall, which
obliterated much of the grid and created very heavy going for the crew.
During the period November 9-20^, 1998, Delta Geoscience completed
approximately 23 kilometers of Induced Polarization and Resistivity surveying.
Overburden thickness, although generally negligible, varies from O to 10 meters.
There are numerous areas of outcrop.
^
l0^" "V Jo^t,' ,;^t 1'"'^ ;
Is ciiiiii *.',; c,'iiifefish' . : •'••' i
i j -w*?.****... - '.^ Propertyl- Q v K LV ' '-1 .- 'fwwv^riv l——————-———-——' f /'' i|?Ii Otukamamoan ,~--f " wre/p . ^S^JLT" -*'A//V/ , L ,r " -\~--•rifiiMa^vXtf^ii^' I J } \ h L "li" V y ' '"*tf- ' ' Jr-"^~\^' -t—-'-^~,———— •-Turtle^--'-- —'^fe-'--'^Uj.:-::.-:^—^ /^—\- -^'Wff
J^Sfefei^Bk-.^ ;'^4 ,L
J ','jM^-"'. QUETiCp.ff"""' :
:^-..| : Ato Cro/Vy - x J -v.
^ ,' . L -
; ^PRPVINCI;1L PARK V
'J':' ;r:-frookeil ii
; .V i ' /' ' 'lh ; . d i S^wnflfra. t.' H /jy i l' ^. "i" vooc/ . . J - - T-0';''"^-r-'! '-N ";r ': '-'t'---""' ."' ,'-"'" - (
•H:!.--.,^:^-.^-!-.-::.- -. ;w '3^r^ ^f,;;;^f
40 80i
kilometres
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.
Herontrack PropertyAtikokan Area
Ontario—^——^-—
General Location
Staalrgaard Dan: nor 97 r;-.. Geologlcal |ni.t h.noc | Nq
CD—s
— 49' 00' N
logging road 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
KILOMETRES
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.Herontrack Property
Atikokan Area Ontario
West Block Claim Locations
Dote: Mar 97 I ,— TGeological nj. ; h.rcloi^ | Figure 2o
CD
en
h- 49" 00' N
logging road O 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
KILOMETRES
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.Herontrack Property
Atikokan AreaOntario ——^
East Block Claim Locations
Staargaard Dote: Mor 97 ___ Geological nt- hereiom. 2b
PERSONNEL
Grant Hendrickson - Senior Geophysicist/Supervisor.
Jared Strokon - Junior Geophysicist.
Ladislav Zabo - Geographer.
In addition, Atikokan provided two very able helpers to assist with the survey.
These men were residents of Atikokan, Ontario. Their cheerful assistance and local
knowledge was greatly appreciated.
EQUIPMENT
2 - Ms Instruments IP-6 Receivers,
l - Ms Instruments VIP-4000 Transmitter.
6 - Motorola HT1000 VHP Radios,
l - Toshiba T1950CT Field Computer,
l - Hewlett Packard 250C Colour Plotter.
6-ReelsofI.P.
8 - Porous Pot Potential Electrodes.
20 - Stainless Steel Current Electrodes,
l - 4x4 GMC Suburban Truck.
DATA PRESENTATION
The geophysical data is presented in three styles:
a) Colour contour plans (Figs. #3-4, 7-16). Note that black and white contour plans
were also produced in the event they are needed for assessment reports.
b) Stacked profiles of the Induced Polarization and Resistivity data (Fig. #5).
All of the above maps are appended to the back of this report and are at a scale of
1:5000.
Included in the text of this report are reduced scale (l: 15000) plans of the colour
contour plans (Figs. #3R and 4R), for convenience in viewing all the data in a standard
page-size format.
The gradient electrode array used to acquire all the Induced Polarization and
Resistivity data has an important advantage over other common electrode arrays in the
horizontal resolution of apparent sulphide anomalies, while maintaining an excellent
depth of investigation
A nine point Manning filter (minor smoothing) was applied to the grid files prior
to producing the contour plans.
The colour maps that accompany this report have been prepared so that low
numerical values are displayed in the blue colour, whereas the higher numerical data
values are red.
The stacked profile plan (Fig. #5) allows one to view the anomalous areas without
the introduction of any contouring bias. Anomaly profile wavelengths are directly
dependent on the width and depth of anomalous zones.
The posted data plans allow one to view the raw data and are generally required
for assessment reports.
Fig. #3R.
wane_____ajoci:
MOTE 3WOK
Induced Polarization Plan Reduced to 1:15,000.
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION PUNHEBONTRACK LAKE PROJECT
ATIKOKAN. OtTTARIO
•al *rr*y d*U. AE o ?4QWiv H _______jlu*, IBM^^^^ . CEOSCI&HCS LTV.
Fig. #4R.
MOPE______acme______naot______iaeot______atom______woot______aaoog______Moot
l
S3B-
-tl-
Resistivity Plan Reduced to 1:15,000.
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC
BmUur InUml 1009 0*0;-Bnl imrteU, H * MOOm. k
_______Hw, 1(M______ GBOSCONCS LTD,
SURVEY PROCEDURE
Atikokan had previously established a large grid on their property. Survey lines
were 100 meters apart with survey stations established every 25 meters.
Survey lines bearing due north were tied together by three tie lines at 1900N,
2400N and 3200N. The grid was established so that all co-ordinates are in northings and
eastings.
As mentioned earlier, the gradient array electrode configuration was used for all
the I.P/Resistivity work. The basic grid coverage was completed with a current electrode
separation "AB" of 2600 meters, and a potential electrode separation "MN" of 50 meters.
Overlap on each reading was fifty percent, i.e. 25 meters between data points. Note that
it is generally preferable to keep the "MN" distance as small as signal levels and grid
station chaining accuracy will allow, in order to achieve the best possible horizontal
resolution of anomalies. With the electrode array as outlined above, and the very high
resistivities encountered, the depth of investigation is approximately 700 meters, with the
array focused at the 450-meter depth.
For the detailing of anomalies, a series of smaller "AB" gradient arrays were
centered over the anomalies of interest. For this detailing, the "MN" distance was fixed
at 25 meters for improved horizontal resolution of near surface features. If, in the future,
more resolution in key areas is required, one can reduce the "MN" size further, since
signal to noise levels are excellent in this survey area due to the high ground resistivities
and powerful transmitter employed.
The five induced polarization/resistivity sections (Figs. #5-14) that accompany
this report were constructed by surveying portions of lines 3000E, 2800E and 2700E with
7
varying size gradient arrays, each clearly focused at a different exploration depth. The
current electrode separations were varied down from 2600m, 1800m, 1200m and 600m.
The focus depth of these arrays is considered to be approximately 0.19 of the current
electrode separation. The depth of investigation of an electrode array can normally be
accurately determined from the simultaneous inversion of chargeability and resistivity
depth sounding data (when available), in conjunction with detailed geologic knowledge
of the stratigraphy from borehole and/or surface outcrops. An array's depth of
investigation parameters obtained from detailed analysis of one survey area, can
generally be applied to similar geological settings elsewhere.
The apparent depth scale shown on the I.P/Resistivity sections that accompany
this report is the depth below the ground surface and assumes flat topography. When
more detailed topographic information is available, the geophysical data can be draped
with the topography. This step is considered essential when working with shallow
dipping or flat lying mineralized zones in steep terrain. The moderate topography at
Herontrack Lake does not present this problem.
The geophysical survey work so far described was designed to evaluate the
Herontrack property in a cost-effective manner. The prime goals of this deeply focused,
high-resolution survey were as follows:
a) Sulphide mineralization (spatial position and strength).
b) Assistance in geological mapping of the different lithologics and alterations.
c) Delineation of major structures.
DISCUSSION OF THE DATA
Lumby Lake and Herontrack Lake prevented full survey coverage. Initially, we
had hoped to survey these relatively narrow lakes from a boat, however a rapid freeze-up
of the lake in conjunction with the storms mentioned earlier, prevented this from being
effective. Ice thickness was also not sufficient at this time to allow for lake access.
The deeply focused Induced Polarization and Resistivity plans (Figs. #3 and 4)
clearly outline the property's geology and significant sulphide occurrences. The contour
patterns generally support a steep north dip to the volcanics stratigraphy. Computer
modelling of induced polarization/resistivity responses from a large, deep (400m)
massive sulphide target, has indicated that we can expect only a very modest reduction in
resistivity in conjunction with a 3 to 6 mV/V increase in the induced polarization
response above background.
The most significant anomalies were studied in detail through the sections
prepared for lines 3000E, 2800E and 2700E (Figs. #7-16).
The overall very high resistivity background (ranges 4000 to 40,000 ohm-m) and
the direct correlation of induced polarization anomalies with all the known surface
sulphide occurrences, indicates that we are working with a very siliceous package of
rocks and that all I.P. responses are likely related to sulphide mineralization. The
presence (within the 2300N to 3100N corridor) of graphitic metasediments containing
disseminated sulphides can be discounted, although not totally ignored. When the grid is
extended further north, where intercalated mafic volcanics and metasediments have been
mapped, there may be more complications, particularly since the northern area is known
to host numerous bedrock conductors detected by previous airborne electromagnetic
surveys.
Offsets in the contour patterns suggest a northeast trending linear structure
(possibly containing non-magnetic dikes) passes through the grid from approx. 2475E,
1900N to 3075E, 3200N. The ground magnetic data previously collected by Atikokan
should be reprocessed and displayed in solid colour contour plans.
Geologic features of good depth extent are well outlined in the accompanying
plans (Figs. #3 and 4), however any geologic feature of very poor depth extent will not be
outlined very well, except in the detail areas.
The broad high resistivity zone that is outlined in the southwest corner of the
survey, likely represents a sub-volcanic intrusion with a related flow or sill-like body
(width approx. 100 meters) crossing the grid at approx. 21 SON.
The broad resistivity low centered at 2450N, but extending to the north, is likely
related to alteration and increases in the overall sulphide content of the rocks at depth.
The sections (Figs. #7-16) illustrate this point.
The chargeability plan (Fig. #3) is an interesting map. The discordant I.P.
anomaly centered on line 3000E is at odds with the overall stratigraphy. This anomaly's
strike extent is from 2800E to 3200E (400m) and overall this anomaly may represent
three or four stacked sulphide zones occurring in a stratigraphic interval of approx. 600
meters. The location of this anomaly in the downdip and hanging wall of the main
sulphide showings is an important feature that could represent a felsic centre. This
anomalous area was detailed and will be discussed further later in this report,
10
The broad apron to the induced polarization contours that extent to the south at
2950N between lines 2500E and 31 GOE, is also an important feature that is best
manifested on L.2800E, where the I.P. response suggests an intense vertical dipping
apparent sulphide zone at 3075N.
The long strike length I.P. anomaly centered at 2350N and extending to the west
of line 2700E, lies largely within Lumby Lake. This I.P. anomaly, while not adequately
defined, is probably related to two closely spaced sulphide zones subcropping beneath the
lake. Near surface, these zones are relatively thin but widen appreciably at depth. The
proximity and on-strike relationship of this large anomaly to the known mineralization
exposed at approx. 2950E, 2400N, is very encouraging, despite the fact we were only
able to partially outline the body at this time. The sections prepared for the south end of
line 2700E (Figs. #1 and 8), help in the understanding of the potential of this anomaly.
The main showings of significant mineralization do correlate very closely with
two relatively narrow I.P. responses centered at 2400N and 2300N respectively on line
3050E. These near surface narrow I.P. responses show excellent depth extent. The
improvement in the I.P. response with depth clearly indicates an increase in the
percentage of sulphides at depth.
A discussion of each individual section follows:
Section L.2700E, South Side: (Figs. #7 and 8)
The two relatively thin I.P. anomalies that extend up to the surface are related to a
much stronger feature at depth, centered at 2400N. This deep feature (400 meters) is
clearly dipping steeply north and is an excellent target for massive to semi-massive
sulphide mineralization.
11
The flat lying feature at a depth of approx. 350m may represent a feeder zone to
the main responses discussed above. There is some suggestion of another felsic centre in
theareaof2500E, 2600N.
The modest resistivity lows that directly correlate with the increases in induced
polarization response, clearly support the interpretation of semi-massive sulphides at
depth.
The near vertical broad zones of high resistivity (width 100m), centered at 2175N
may represent a very siliceous felsic flow.
Section L.2700E. North side: (Figs. #9 and 10)
Starting at 3000N and extending to the north edge of the survey, there is a strong
increase in the I.P. response that extends from the surface to depth (500m). Both the
resistivity and I.P. data suggest that this is a geologically complicated area. There is a
correlation of the highest resistivity response (35000 ohm-m) with the highest I.P.
response (24 mV/V) at 3200N, that could be related to disseminated sulphides (2-5 07o) in
a very siliceous rock, perhaps a Chert. Some relatively shallow drilling could confirm
this.
Section L.2800E, North side: (Figs. #11 and 12)
This section was prepared to evaluate the highest I.P. responses recorded during
the survey. A very localised improvement in the I.P. response centered at 3125N was
noted. This improvement in the response occurs at depth within a broad near surface area
of anomalously high chargeability and correlated directly with a distinct, but modest
resistivity low. Resistivities dropped from approx. 20,000 ohm-m to 9,000 ohm-m.
12
The detailed work showed that the anomaly peaked at 47 mV/V with the top of
the zone being approx. 225 meters below the surface. This feature is an excellent target
for a relatively small semi-massive body surrounded by a broad zone of disseminated (3-
40/)) sulphides.
The bulge or elongation of the I.P. anomaly that extends to the south at the 350
meter depth may be related to a feeder zone that crosscuts the stratigraphy.
Section L.3000E. South side: (Figs. #13 and 14)
This section was prepared to evaluate the very significant surface showings
discovered by Atikokan. These important showings correlate closely with two thin near
vertical I.P. responses centered at 2400N and 2300N respectively. The I.P. responses
exhibit good depth extent. The rapid depth attenuation of the directly correlating near
surface modest resistivity low (4000 ohm-m) is predicted by computer modelling. The
improvement in apparent sulphide content at depth appears closely related to the apparent
flat lying feeder zone at the 350m depth discussed previously. Notice how this zone is
crosscutting the steeply north dipping felsic volcanic stratigraphy. Shallow drilling of the
showings is initially warranted. Any encouragement in the drilling should lead to deeper
downdip tests.
Section L.3000E. North side: Figs. #15 and 16)
This section was prepared to evaluate the potential for a deeply buried felsic
centre or feeder zone occurring along the centre portion of line 3000E. The occurrence of
at least four stacked I.P. anomalies (apparent sulphide horizons) between 2300N and
3100N along this line is considered very significant. The excellent felsic fragmental
13
geology and very significant mineralization at 2400N further supports the concept of a
feeder zone.
The broad, flat lying IP. response centered at 2975N and lying at a depth of 360
meters could be the centre for the postulated deeply buried feeder zone/felsic centre.
Remember that modelling results have indicated a deeply buried massive sulphide
deposit would only have an I.P. response 4 or 5 mV/V above background.
At 2675N there is a narrow steeply north dipping I.P. anomaly. The top of this
anomaly lies at a depth of approx. 150 meters. This feature likely represents another
sulphide horizon which is clearly related to the postulated, much deeper feeder zone.
Both zones should ultimately be drill tested.
14
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This geophysical project began with the concept that a deeply buried felsic
eruptive centre was probably responsible for the apparent distal mineralization observed
in the trenching on the west shore of Herontrack Lake. In the detection of massive or
semi-massive sulphide related to such a deep centre, it was felt that the broad increase in
the sulphide content of the rocks that envelopes massive sulphide deposits could be
detected and mapped with the induced polarization techniques outlined in this report.
The spatial position and amplitude of the I.P/Resistivity anomalies outlined by
this survey clearly support the original exploration concept and several significant drill
targets have been outlined, all of which have excellent geological support. The amplitude
and size of these anomalies is excellent, considering their depths.
Not surprisingly, the better anomalies are occurring at depths that largely preclude
their detection by the airborne electromagnetic surveys flown several years previously.
Five of the most significant drill targets are listed below:
1) L.3050E, the two shallow I.P. zones at 2400N ands 2300N.
2) L.3000E, the deep I.P. zone at 2700N and its extension to the north.
3) L.2800E, the deep I.P. zone at 3125N and its extension to the south.
4) L.2700E, the deep steeply north dipping I.P. zone at 2400N and its extension to
the north.
5) L.2700E, the moderate depth I.P. zone at 3200E that correlates with very high
resistivity.
Casing should be left in all the drill holes, since holes may ultimately be deepened
and borehole E.M. surveys may prove helpful.
15
This report needs to be closely correlated with all of the available geological
information, particularly the maps illustrating the alteration indexes and felsic fragmental
geology.
Grant A. Hendrickson, P.Geo.
16
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Grant A. Hendrickson
B.Science, University of British Columbia, Canada, 1971. Geophysics option.
For the past 27 years, I have been actively involved in mineral exploration projects throughout Canada, the United States, Europe, Central and South America and Asia.
Registered as a Professional Geoscientist with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia, Canada.
Registered as a Professional Geophysicist with the Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta, Canada.
Active member of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, and the British Columbia Geophysical Society.
Dated at Delta, British Columbia, Canada, this .5" day of Dec 1998.
G. *. HENDRICKSON' ~) l
IA/, Jf
*
Grant A. Hendrickson, P. Geo.
17
REFERENCES
Barker, Ron, Blunk, Inken, and Smith, lan, Jan, 1996: Geophysical Considerations in the Design of the U.K. National Resistivity Sounding Database: First Break, Vol. 14, No. 2, February, 1996.
Battacharya, B.B., and Dutta, I., 1982: Depth of Investigation Studies for Gradient Arrays over Homogeneous Isotropic Half-Space: Geophysics, Vol. 47, 1198-1203.
Coggon, J.H., 1973: A Comparison of I.P. Electrode Arrays: Geophysics, Vol. 38, 737- 761.
Langore, L., Alikay, P, and Gjovreku, D., 1989: Achievement in Copper Sulphide Exploration in Albania with I.P. and E.M. Methods: Geophysical Prospecting 37,975-991.
Malmqvist, L., 1978: Some Applications of I.P. Technique for Different Geophysical Prospecting Purposes: Geophysical Prospecting 26, 97-121.
Staargaard, C.F., March 31, 1997: A Proposal for Exploration on the Herontrack Lake Property, Lumby Lake Area, Ontario, Canada.
Ward, Stanley H., 1990: Resistivity and Induced Polarization Methods: Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, Vol. l, Investigations in Geophysics 5, 147-190.
Ontario o* Assessment Work Performed on Mining Land
U(2)MHlM()).ltS.0.1tM
gUont 86(2) md W(3) of Hw MWno.(Mfll WOnt WtO OOfflMpOAQ WWI VM
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 900Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands before recording a claim, use form 024QMI
-Please type or print in ink. Jr8|9iiilliBil,2i3,4iS,6
1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a fat If necessary) ^ * J. D ^ *-^ ___________dent Number
AddmuDU)
Telephone Numbtr707-5*97
/2-fVpAfr . n N!. rf l l f*^u i^ fi-XlA l J |X^ i POT" i Cd) FM Number
Oient Number
Addnt*
Fix Number
2. Type of work performed: Check (^) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declarationGeotechnical- prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (nags)
Physical: drifting stripping, trenching and associated assays
Rehabilitation
Work Type
jOffice Use
ComnwfcyToWSValueof Work Claimed ^ 7
|
Te rfTS Reference
Gtotal PcnMoning SpMm Ma (fMMfcl TwmKptAn* Mining Division 7^-^^MOfG*tanNumb(r Resident Geologist
District
Please remember to. -obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required? *"- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report
3. Pereon or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)
&/S* t i*. Ttdphonc Numbtr
NumberFax
RECEIV
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT—'——orncc ——4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agent l, f?i*sf r , do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in
7 (Mn Mn*)this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completion and. to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.
A^S* ^LAgent's Telephone Number Fax Number^7-5-9-7
•J -
iu t,i*m*5. Work to be recorded and distributed, worn can oinyland where work was performed, at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous Ink must
111- a?/Mnmg CWm Number. Or ifwofk wtt *J0f** on othty •vajUf mMn9 tanc. sltowln Wt
T* 7*27
Number of CMm Unlto.ForoOwr mMng tond, tot
16 h*
pWVD^HMQ Oft (Ms)eMmerotwrnVPanQ EMQ.
vatutofworfc •ppll*)d to this
N/A
amgmdtoothwVMM of work
UtodMribuMd M i Mure date
S24.000 S2.t25
1234867 12 S24.000
12345*8 S IJ02 (4.000 J4.W2
"705*42 16 /B.7L.60
/i/e? 32. S, 2400 ^9-1JS- av
/•2-t 02-2.7 ft 660
/3./O "22. B S 600
•/"2.1&22.910 f Z. /O 236 4-
14 12.15*^.*} JA i ^ u 133315
Celunn Total*
c. 'Z* . do henfby-ceWfythat the above work credits are eligible under subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 8/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to the claim where the work was done.
pf Recanted HolderS?. /f f?
6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.
Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check K) in the boxes below to show how you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:
O 1 Credits are to be cut back frcm (he Bar* IrstfoNcM^ by op^O 2. Credits are to be cutback starting with the claims feted last workingO 3. Credits are to be cut back equaly over aS cbims feted in this declaration;D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as foH ws (describe):
Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits wHI be cut back from foflowed by option number 2 if necessary
For Office Use Only——————-—————---— Received Stamp
JAN i Q JS33SEOSC,ENCf ,SSEssMENT
THUNDER BAYWINING DIVtSIONRECEIVED
De*nwdAppravw)Oate
DttoAcvcovad
Date Notification Sent
Tow) Vilut rf Credit Approved
Approved (or Rteording by Mining Rwoidcr (Sigiulun)
** TOTPL PflGE.04 **
Ontario Statement of Coste for Assessment Credit•id MMS
Pawn* Manrafion ettadad en tt* tarn Is ebWntd undir t* *ulhoi*|r ar wbMcfen6(l)o(VM
Tranudton Number (oflice UMJ
U)-W fa Art) AtWo* RtgiMon V9t. Under Mctfen 8 ol tt* Mntag nd wfti tt* n**v Iwid holdw. Quofara ibout N(
o( Northon Oimtinmrt md Mkm. *d f^r. 93i Ran^| UtatUP*^. P^y QnHrio^3E
-\ l
Work TypeUnltv of wocfc
Otptndbig on M lyp* of wor*. W tw numtar of touraMy*wgrfc*d.m*OTo(drtfeio,l grid In*, numtar of origin, 4te.
Cost Ptr UnK off wonc
Total Cert
ri ff
Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).
/g/^: ga//n.66
Transportation Costs
W 2 O 1999Food and Lodging Costs
Calculations of Filing Discounts:
JAN 2 0 IC39GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT
OFFICE
Total Value of Assessment Woric
1 . Work filed within two years of performance is claimed at 100* of the above Total Value of Assessment Work.2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance. rt can only be claimed at 50* of the Total
Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:
TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK Total t value of worked claimed.
Note:- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for credit- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of coste within 45 days of a
request f or verification and/or con^ction/darrflcation. If \^ertfication and/or carrectiori/dariricatkjn is not made, the Minister may reject au or part of flie assessment work submitted.
Certification verifying costs:
l, J\qttn**a n. OertfCLlC'ne'L* .l, -r*iqbMt)uf fi. OerMeLlcWL, . do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may reasonably
be determined and the costs were incurred white conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on the accompanying
Declaration of Work form as T/^eSs&t/M ___________________ l am authorized to make this certification.
THUNDER BAYMNMQDmWONWECKVEO
Ministry of Ministere duNorthern Development Developpement du Nordand Mines et des Mines Ontario
Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road
June 15, 1999 6th FloorSudbury, Ontario
Raymond A. Bernatchez P3E 6B5ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.BOX 1376, 126 WILLOW ROAD Telephone: (888) 415-9846ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO Fax: (877)670-1555POT-1 CO
Visitourwebsite at: www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/MINES/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm
Dear Sir or Madam: Submission Number: 2.19091
Status Subject: Transaction Number(s): W9940.00024 Approval After Notice
We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.
If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice. Allowable changes to your credit distribution can be made by contacting the Geoscience Assessment Office within this 45 Day period, otherwise assessment credit will be cut back and distributed as outlined in Section #6 of the Declaration of Assessment work form.
Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Bruce Gates by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5856.
Yours sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section
Correspondence ID: 13904
Copy for: Assessment Library
Work Report Assessment Results
Submission Number: 2.19091
Date Correspondence Sent: June 15, 1999 Assessor: Bruce Gates
Transaction NumberW9940.00024
First Claim Number1185425
Township(s) 1 Area(s)NORWAY LAKE
StatusApproval After Notice
Approval Date
June 15, 1999
Section:14 Geophysical IP
Correspondence to:Resident Geologist Thunder Bay, ON
Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON
Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):Raymond A. Bernatchez ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC. ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO
Page: 1Correspondence ID: 13904
REFERENCES
vjumver L.UKC
49807'3O"—n
l—p
raftfifr-x^^J
1231936f23l93 1231883
52532 b^——: Ub \I209'945202I250 1210223
o
1232005 i I232004--,--—'926465 1926466 85426
•I3M.X? 1185427
1210 221KENORA
f f ^^I2I69IODISTRICT22M l—— ———— -— —44M—————— —l
DBTRICT
I2I6496I2I6491216494-L --
2166861021564012164371
49^*00
91 0 I5'
Sawbill Bay - Marmion Lake G-558
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITIONMHO - Miring Rights OnlySKO Surf act* i^ight* OnlyMtS - Mining and Surface Rights
Dajcrlplion Qrdar No. Date^ Disposition File No.
mma a IURFACI WOHT* WTHWWWW. OWPEH w--w-4ow,MTEP M/Of /B7, FCm A PREeCHPCP ffJBH
O-TB e/9* NWR
L L n j The information thai appear* on 1hta map ha* been compiledfrom varlou* sources, and accuracy b not guaranteed, l nose wlahlna 1o stake mining daim* shouid consult with the Miring Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, for optional Information on the status of the lands shown hereon.
LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUTE No OTHER ROADS TRAILSSURVEYED LINES
TOWNSHIPS, BASE LINES, ETCLOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC
UNSURVEYED LINES:LOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC.
RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY LINES NON-PERENNIAL STREAM F LOGGING OR F LOOPING RIGHTS ' SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE" MARSH OR MUSKEGMINESTRAVERSE MONUMENT
•ET l t
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOLPATENT, SURFACE ft MINING RIGHTS .................. t
" t SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY........................ 6" .MINING RIGHTS ONLY--..—..-............... Q
LEASE, SURF ACE li MINING RIGHTS.————-.—- B" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.......,.......,..—,... B" .MINING RIGHTS ONLY......-—......,-..—-. B
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ............................... TORDER-IN-COUNCIL .......,............,.....-.....—... OCRESERVATION ....^...................,-...........™. ©CANCELLED ___.......,..^.......................... *SAND ft GRAVEL .......M ...........,...m............. f) ,
LAND Use PERMIT FOR COMMERCIAL TOURISM, OUTPOST CAMPS Y/MOTff: MININO MIGHTS IN FARCE LS PATENTED PRIOR TO MAY 8
1*13, VISTEO IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LAND* ACT. R.t.O. 1O7O. CHAP 3*O, tt C *3, tUUEC 1.
SCALE: 1 INCH * 40 CHAINS
FEET1000 2OOO 4000 AOOO •000
O 900METRES
AREA
1OOOM KM)
2000(2 KM l
NORWAY LAKEMN.R ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
ATIKOKANMINING DIVISION
THUNDER BAYLAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION
RAINY RIVER/KENORAMinistryof LandNatural ManagementResources Branch
Ontario
D-li NO V .2 7 , 1 O 8 1
In lervlc. 93/OI/ie
Nitmhtr
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 200 G-545
H 85 425
HERONTRMClt
LUMBY LAKE
Scale 155000
185426, \\B5AZS
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES IMCTt e H f ne 2 —S PROJECT
. ONTARIO GRID HAf
GEO SCIENCE LTD52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 220
ATIKOKAN Resources me.A Mineral Showing
® Mineralized Float Boulder
— Main Logging Rood
— Older Logging Road
z; o o"*CO
o oC\JCO
o o oCO
o oCO OJ
iz; o oCO
o o
o o wCd
Oo o
o oCO
2000E——r—— 2200E 2400E——i——- 2600E 2800E 3000E 3200E 3400E
2000E 2200E 2400E 2600E 2800E 3000E 3200E 3400E
CO^
Oo
ODto o o
COo o o
roCD O O2:
ro en o o2. 1909 l RECEIVED
JAN 2 O 1999GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT ___ OFFICE
O O
fV)o o•z; \
-N
ro o o o
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
CD O O
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION PLANHERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT
ATIKOKAN, ONTARIOcontour interval 0.5 mV/V
Gradient array data, AB @ 2600m, MN-50mIris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 230
2000E 2200E 2400E 2600E 2800E
ooCO
o oCJ CO
o o oCO
iz; o oCO
o oCO OJ
jz; o o
o oOJ OJ
Z o o o
o oCO
3000E——i—— 3200E 3400E
2000E 2200E 2400E 2600E 2800E 3000E 3200E 3400E
o o
COwoo
COo o o
roCD O O
-*o
too o
ro ro o o
tooo o
CD O O
G Q\S tj
RECEIVEDJAN 2 Q 1999
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE______
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.RESISTIVITY PLAN
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO
contour interval 1000 ohm-m Gradient array data, AB @ 2600m,
Iris instruments Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
S2G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 240
o oCO
2; o o
'z. o o o
ooCD
OoCD
Oo
o o
o o o
o oDO
2000E ——i—— 2200E 2400E 2600E 2800E 3000E——i~—— 3200E 3400E ——i——
2000E 2200E 2400E 2600E 2800E 3000E 3200E 3400E
GC AO Oz:
CJro o o
COo o o
roCOo o
T Q-*- O'
ro4^O O
ro roo o
ro oo o
CD O O
RECEIVEDJAN 2 fl 1999
JEOSCIENCEASSESSMENT
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION 7 RESISTIVITY PROFILES
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO
Charg. solid line © lcm - 10 rnV/V, base 10 mV/VRes. dash line @ lcm^20000ohm-m, base 25000ohm-m
Iris instruments, Gradient data, AE^2600m, MN=50mNov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
S2G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 250
2000E 2200E 2400E 2600E 2800E 3000E 3200E 3400E
ooCO
2oow00
2o0oCO
2ooCOcv
ZooCO
2Oo•-tcv
2oowW
•2-OOOCV
2oOCOr- H
CO— —
18 19 T 17
17 19 } 17
13 18 -13
18 15 r!7
17 14 H4
15 12 13
13 11 12
8 12 13
7 11 -13
..
IB
IB
19
r20
10
20
34
242151
14 -21•23
is -ie -2313 1 14 ^
13 j 14
13
13
13
13
12
12
11
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
10
!"lie
14
15
15
15
13
11
9
a10
10
111112
12
12
U
LI
li
-11 t 11tilHI
fH
~
19
IB
17 13 IB
16 16 13 12
12 12 9 9
9 11 10 10
9 10 ID 10
10 10 9 8
10 10 9 8
10 10 9 B
10 9 B B
10 9 9 9
10 9 9 10
10 9 10 9
10 10 10 7
12
9
a7
a7
7
6
8
8
8
7
11 10 10 8 J8
17
10
10
13
B
B
7•f
B
B
B
B
B
9
9
9
20
1517
1516
ta141513
1113eee79121211
1010
11111111
17
16
18
IB
12
11
B
B
B
10
B
B
B
S
7
B
B
10
20
19
21 23 20
23 23 28
24
23
19
19
18
IB
17
17
17
16
14
13
12
11
10
10
H
11
10
10
10
11
11
10
B
11
12
19
14
13
IB
14
13
10
9
10
B
8
7
5
5
5
aeaai
18 17 19 21 23 23 24
20
20
36
24
10
10
17
18
17
16
15
15
12
12
13
12
13
13
10
10
10
10
11
12
11
11
11
13
12
14
14
11
13
14
1313
9
B
10
10
8
7
B
6
6
6
B
6
14
17
22
80
17
15
15
15
15
15
14
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
13
7
47
10
18
15
10
11
10
12
15
13
12
11
10
11
10
aaa77
7
7
6
6
B
6d11 10 9 7 ±7 . -. -v
16
17
19
18
17
16
16
16
16
15
15
15
14
13
14
13
14
14
14
15
15
3
6
6
6
9
12
15
17
13
4
13
16
11
7
7
B
B
B
B
7
7
7
e7
7
e6
22
23
23
B
4
6
B
13
15
14
13
13
12
18
14
13
13
14
24 26 24
24 27 24
24 25 22
35 22 19
24 IB 19
7 15 16
7 8
69
6 6
9 7
11 t
12 B
11
12
12
13
13
11
14
IB
•-
f**f-
S
5
eB
10
15
IB
yll
B
e7
7
7
7
B
B
7
6B
11
9
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
ett
6 D U
6fiV
—
1 1 1 . . ...—....... ....... . 1
^O0^
COro0o^
COooo2
roCDOo•Z.
™ '? Q A 4\ -tgx I DCg - i/ U U I! f neO ** '' 12 f '
JGEOSCI
roi-^1
0o2
roro0o^
K
ro f0o yo2
Scale
-
^C~EJVEm'AN 2 0 1999 1cniot ASSliS^AjlFJUT f—^OFFlCP '"Cfv 1 1
\i —
1:5000100 0 100 200 300
(meters)
SOO
2000E 2200E 2400E 2600E 2800E 3000E 3200E 3400E ATIKOKAN RFSOTJRfFS INC
INDUCED POLARIZATION PLANHERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT
ATIKOKAN , ONTARIOposted data
Gradient array data, AB @ 2600m, MN^SOmIris instruments
Nov,
fi II OH DELTA GEOSCIENCE1998
LTD, Fig #6*,
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE260
2000E 2200E 2400E 2600E 2800E 3000E 3200E 3400E
2:0o
oocvCO
jz;o ooCO
j2.OoCOcv?
H,
ooCDC\2
^OO
W
:z;ooCJ
Jg.oooOJ
o0COT ——— t
———————— i ———————— i i
_ -
T 29232 -25882 22004 ; 16532 -E1256j
31051 25101 1947B J166B7
20532 19886 16865
19566 26773 17086
21775 23897 20617
26016 12799 23645
25817 1MOO 17873
19011 16329 11529
15082 17019 10096
13915
13762
19940
16319
12074
7151
5606
7433
9689
i 12334jj 10785
J6414
J5617
-5521
-11773
-29902
-44768
J385T7
—
22909
15264
13136
16686
19661
^9376
—
40924
44265
65592 59244 -
69889 : 87888 64303 1 55494
68161 63624 56217 -43050
38854 82722 60068 -47557
35994 60708 53137 66736
55224 58129 52807 '48730
63767 55428 48907 40992
69667 57933 52245 42599
68352 55456 52817 38089
72239 53842 49213 49353
61857 83765 48287 53389
63480 83127 61306 45479
71272 75426 63515 55882
72556 90747 80323 87304AflAAf\ IQdOrt ftflQIO flKOA*?
64105
46009
47635
20311
17862
17186
9450
11961
17365
16162
21821
25912
19064
9644
10217
10103
8757
9785
11140
10151
13170
19441
23000
22063
19967
17440
16422
30668
30793
30671
225042990127B34339221959230070 169461016116079273373077827603269552803121492124761066051013311475697421119111138178962163517206164011695816913166961687118307
19557
27986
33590
46888
66071
18722
19012
20970
18081
18754
46834j
52822 163382
53226 25744 -43983
48984 -24702 T 37049
38608 {24844
31058
28187
40448
48949
45621
55928
84780
89034
46487
59384
42367
33638
42488
41321
48401
55233
40260
31919
23171
19592
39909
48949
37188
33094
38167COOK'3
16779
24275
27370 20204 5814
20944 18921 10526
19488
20208
18656
18259
18932
28307
29006
25993
33228
32198
23157
11248
2984
2581
11594
19279
17090-
16582
14297
16432
13713
17920
13916
9763
12339
13589
12102
10488
10611
12476
14129
1BB2B
19326
42877
53583
42112
54530
58170
29453
14635
12176
17888
22296
27811
40712
41919OAQjin
3463
18291
31481
5333
10747
16613
12774
10781
16941
21437
20530
24402
16555
2983
3648
5674
4826
6020
9070
698*
11087
16399
14932
19212
19113
12286
12186
13800
12972
12088
8833
7806
8818
10181
11480
27415
31930
24361
31873
37359
42135
45571
37424
82116
19329
17776
13490
14182
24871OODOO
16041
13412
15118
20450
21254
14104
8030
5846
679B
11946
15939
14883
18520
1B33B
9071
8102
6557
5874
6233
8489
8960
14001
19809
14520
9506
10872
13118
12709
9540
6519
10637
12778
10418
12500
12275
9880
7673
5472
1B878
27889
23485
37764
47455
32421
30541
30369
23089
28206
21452
21838
24961
1932EI"*91OVJvVt laBiSl DUalH vWnt vmw wo-rv -uotnza iibiu
20169
16873
16578
18084
16265
18893
13007
8743
8120
8362
10132
13038
14892
14761
11207
11331
12066
15004
18641
20244
22302
14323
7788
11376
11438
8000
12216
18113
13066
9281
7893
6449
9663
10788
7676
8186
10219
16277
30255
50316
40325
31854
38791
31316
20071
21971
26393
20588
26179
14273
27599
38104
22742
6500
8436
11889
10711
11545
15272
14160
15294
19808
19300
15424
17380
19389
16714
173S3
18140 21143 17171
22674 29946 27307
37860 27892 39720
36645 24412 34793
10772 14845 18614
2782 4290 10116
6057 4332 10168
17911 10878
20242 14282
18059 18817
17810 33105
21446 38779
25447 34378
21079
19605
23802
21750
20136
26229
27248 ••— — -~—
26100
-
10831
BB20
8620
12839
12921
9611
W
oo
GOroooz
COooo
KCDOO^^
iXtO}0o
tohP^
7588 - OO2
41841
49788
52962
38814
31546
29042
25292
25854
25256
19003
22476
IJQll"!
40458
42309
35373
30001
34860
34244
20757
30335
38737
33412
28771
23501OUOfl26010 Cr*KJ10 bUUOa
18850
11227
— —
1 1
wrooo^
K
CO (0o Vo^
Scale
i\^
J^
1:5000100 0 100 200 300
(meters)
i — CDO0
2000E 2200E 2400E 2600E 2800E 3000E 3200E 3400E ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC
RESISTIVITY PLANHERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT
ATIKOKAN , ONTARIOposted data
Gradient array data, AB @ 2600m, M^50mIris instruments
Nov,
lillililiinilliH DELTA GEOSCIENCE
1998
LTD, Fig /6b
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 270
o
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1800
1800
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800
,j—^1900 2000 2100
2. 19092900 3000
-50
-100
-150
-200
-350
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
- -600
2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000
lRECEIVED
JAN 2 il 1999
GEOSCIENCE ASSf 3SMENT
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200
(meters)
300
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION SECTION, LINE 2700E HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT south side _________ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO_________
contour interval 0.5 mV/VGradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50m
Iris instrumentsNov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig #7.
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE280
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000111 i---- | j l | - " ' | ' | | | '| ' |
~~ Nif^nBiuioiGouG-jH^c&eiciiaanato
*.*.wc*a^cDGOpoowtt)*.oicB*o-3a]aj-ao-as]-i
-
-
-jceoaiocncncn-JBioowowi^cjicfl*. weoi—Qpot— i-esoBi-*i-''OOi-''roGo*.
l 1 f l i 1 1 ' - - - l . 1 . . . 1 l
1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000
JIIWM
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400 Scale 1:5000100 0 100 200 300
-450 (meters)
-500
-550
-600
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION SECTION, LINE 2700E HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT south side
ATIKOKAN, ONTARIOposted data, mV/V
Gradient array data, AB's 60Q-26QOm, MN 25-50m Iris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig /7V,
52G03SW3004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 290
o
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1800
1800
1900 30QQ 3100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
2900 3000
100
RECEIVEDJAN 2 O 1999
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT _____OFFICE
Scale 1:5000O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.RESISTIVITY SECTION, LINE 2700E
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT south sideATIKOKAN, ONTARIO
contour interval 1000 ohm—mGradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50m
Iris instrumentsNov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 300
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1800
1800
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000——i—————
tfi 5
s Ss2
8 3S 6
S B s se i i
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1900 2000 :ioo 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.RESISTIVITY SECTION, LINE 2700E
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT south sideATIKOKAN, ONTARIOposted data, ohm-m
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50mIris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE
1800
o
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450 -
-500 -
-550 -
-600 -
1800
1900 3000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400i ——————— i —————————————— i ——————— i ——————— ] ——————— i —————————————— i ——————— i ——————— i ——————— f —————————
\.\\\ . \ \ \ v \
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
909 i
100
Scale 1:5000O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION SECTION, LINE 2700EHERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT north side
ATIKOKAN, ONTARIOcontour interval 0.5 mV/V
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50mIris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
52G03SW20Q4 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 32 Q
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 34001 ' 1 'l 1 ••"••"' 1 1 1 1 1 T' ' 1 . r . . . .-... . } : .j.... ! . ! . . . . ...
t-^nll-'-UUEOtOedEdM*-mm-jsO!OoScB — *.-5K5t3t5c5
WUWNrONOiCn-Joo-J3)*.ioK!B.S6U"
***c.^e^*E35:3ES!i:5SCK5E5555S:5;5S;*S:E33:5:28:2g8!eESfgeSK25S5
-
1 1 1 l 1 : 1 1 1 1 1.1 1 1 1 1 1
1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400
li ir mi in li in iiiiini HI lui .li
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
Scale 1:5000100 0 100 200
(meters)
300
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION SECTION,HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT
ATIKOKAN, ONTARIOposted data, mV/V
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600m Iris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD,
LINE 2700E north side
, MN 25-50m
Fig #*U,
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 330
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1800
1800
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 i i ~ i i i
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400
Q
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
100
Scale 1:5000O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.RESISTIVITY SECTION, LINE 2700E
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT north sideATIKOKAN, ONTARIO
contour interval 1000 ohm-mGradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50m
Iris instrumentsNov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 340
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1600
1800
52G03SW2004 2.19091
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300——i—— 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400
l l l-3 SB -j S?! -o 3 -j tE -*a
" i5 S
ex c*
i i"i 03 tt 5 S l l i ® s t
S 3 S ! i
SECP l
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 '800 3900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.RESISTIVITY SECTION, LINE 2700E
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT north sideATIKOKAN, ONTARIOposted data, ohm-m
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50mIris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig /lev.
NORWAY LAKE 359
1800
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
j1800
2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800——r— 2900 3000 3100 3200 ro**3300~- '-'3400
2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
3400
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION SECTION, LINE 2BOOEHERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT north side
ATIKOKAN, ONTARIOcontour interval 0.5 mV/V
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600rn, MN S5-50mIris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig /u,
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 360
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400——— i ————— — r~ " "' ———— i — " 'i"" "i i i i i i r "' i 'i i i i '
uouvicnaiaiab^iaicDUCdSkEScBto^&i
Nuuravia)-jte^iicaiDiEi5bSNSobai*-ai
ESSKSSBBKSSSJgfeESBBsS
-
~
aioiaaacacbca^imOQGatouWip'U *-J^,^NWII— *-P-NI— ooociucflNWMNaicncB~iai~aeB*oS*w3oei
-
1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400
II INI III II III Illlii! illilll Hill
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
T^OOrJU
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
Scale 1:5000100 0 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION SECTION, ONE 2800EHERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT north side
ATIKOKAN, ONTARIOposted data, mV/V
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50m Iris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig /v\fc
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 370
1800
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250 h
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1800
52G03SH2004 2.19091
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
3400if-a.
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
3400
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.RESISTIVITY SECTION, LINE 2800E
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT north side ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO
contour interval 1000 ohm-mGradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50m
Iris instrumentsNov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
NORWAY LAKE JgQ
O
-50
-100 -
-150 -
-200
-250
-300 -
-350 -
-400 -
-450 -
-500 -
-550 -
-600 -
1800
1800
52G03SW2004 2.19091
1900—i— 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400
i iHk l— U P-*
S ea tp S 5 SS W ft C w offi ffi K S M K*
t5 s s s l a
CD OB W O*
i ti* eas i iiS S B
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
O
- -50
-1-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
3400
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.RESISTIVITY SECTION, LINE 2800E
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT north side ATIKOKAN, ONTARIOposted data, ohm-m
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50mIris instruments
Nov. 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
NORWAY LAKE 390
1700 1800
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800
2900 3000
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
2900 3000
1909 l
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION SECTION, LINE 3000EHERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT south side
ATIKOKAN, ONTARIOcontour interval 0.5 mV/V
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN S5-50mIris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
S2G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 4QQ
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1700 1BOO 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000————————————————————— T —————————————————————— 1 ——————————— 1 —————————————————————— 1 —————————————————————— 1 ——————————— 1 —————————————————————— 1 ————————— - -
ViCaCA^Col^^K^aoOi^Uli|kC7iCd ~
-*j en ui t— commute — *~c)tcJiA-aaoeyitiieD
-
91 m to i-*oimumi*ni-*ooi-*QC3i^-JCBDa-4aoai~jm
-
0aaie)Qta)-a^n~j~i^TOBCDBai~J-3^03ta^pd~aait4oaamAci9 WC**I^*-WI**H
..1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 11700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000
————————————————————— Illllllllllllllllllllin ——————————————————————————————————————
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400 Scaie 1:5000100 0 100 200 300
-45
-50
-55
-60
0 (meters)
0
0
0
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION SECTION, LINE 3000E HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT south side
ATIKOKAN, ONTARIOposted data, mV/V
Gradient array data, AB 's 600-2600m, MN 35-50m Iris instruments
Nov, 1998
L DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig /ISV
52G03SW2004 3.19091 NORWAY LAKE 410
1700 1800
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1900 2000 2100 2200——i—— 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000
O
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.RESISTIVITY SECTION, LINE 3000E
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT south side ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO
contour interval 1000 ohm—mGradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50m
Iris instrumentsNov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig /lv*,
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE ^20
1700 1800
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1900 2000 2100 2300 2300——i—— 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000
2 S33; E
H g jfcE. EG 3™2 ftJZ 35 3 ! s
lil-si CO CD
OS B
2 E*
g Sto g v55 s ui-* 2 5
2 iS
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800
O
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
2900 3000
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC,RESISTIVITY SECTION, UNE 3000E
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT south sideATIKOKAN, ONTARIOposted data, ohm-m
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50mIris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig /vww
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 430
1700 1800
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700—————————i———————i——————————————i——————————————i———————i—— 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
--300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
l
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION SECTION, LINE 3000EHERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT north side
ATIKOKAN, ONTARIOcont. int. 0.5 rnV/V,
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50mIris instruments
Nov. 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 440
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
in
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 33001 "1 "' ' - 1 l 1 1 1 1 "••"— T 1 1 " •— '"i ', l-" 1 1 ' 1
ip.if^cneBOba^20bOtin-Jo2*coE3K3ijJi
en cc co ^cooicj53:*-mi— OQi-.OQ*-^Eai-jS*-JcoSSS — — — ES!SRJESKS"5E
-
1 l | 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 ....... Jill
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
i linn inn mn mn mn inn inn mil mn iiiiinii mi -
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400 Scale 1:5000100 0 100 200
-450 (meters)
-500
-550
-600
300
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.INDUCED POLARIZATION SECTION,HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT
ATIKOKAN, ONTARIOposted data, mV/V,
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600m Iris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD,
LINE 3000E north side
MN 25-50m
Fig /ISb
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 450
1700 1800
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-GOO
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200
-. i—-1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200
3300
3300
2*1909]o
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
H-500
— 550
--600
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.RESISTIVITY SECTION, LINE 3000E
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT north side ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO
contour interval 1000 ohm-mGradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25~50m
Iris instrumentsNov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 45Q
1700 1800
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
1900 2000 2100 2200——i-— 2300 8400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
CO Hk
IP ffi-J en
ft S S SE* 3 33
2 ESS -j S g
S-
Oi CD tO *b
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3800 3300
O
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
-550
-600
100Scale 1:5000
O 100 200 300
(meters)
ATIKOKAN RESOURCES INC.RESISTIVITY SECTION, LINE 3000E
HERONTRACK LAKE PROJECT north sideATIKOKAN, ONTARIOposted data, ohm-m,
Gradient array data, AB's 600-2600m, MN 25-50mIris instruments
Nov, 1998
DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD, Fig
52G03SW2004 2.19091 NORWAY LAKE 47 Q