+ All Categories
Home > Documents > George Mason School of Law

George Mason School of Law

Date post: 31-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: dane-porter
View: 33 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
George Mason School of Law. Contracts I Introduction F.H. Buckley [email protected]. George Mason School of Law. Makeup… Next day: Syllabus 2: Economic Gains from Trade. Some housekeeping. The exam: Open Code Optional upgrade based on classroom performance. 4. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
91
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Introduction F.H. Buckley [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: George Mason School of Law

1

George Mason School of Law

Contracts I

Introduction

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]

Page 2: George Mason School of Law

2

Page 3: George Mason School of Law

3

George Mason School of Law

Makeup…

Next day: Syllabus 2: Economic Gains from Trade

Page 4: George Mason School of Law

4

Some housekeeping

The exam: Open Code

Optional upgrade based on classroom performance

4

Page 5: George Mason School of Law

5

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.

Page 6: George Mason School of Law

6

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals

198 A.2d 914 (1964)

Page 7: George Mason School of Law

7

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

350 F.2d 445 (1965)

Page 8: George Mason School of Law

8

Walker-Thomas Furniture Store1074 Seventh St. NW (at L)

8

Page 9: George Mason School of Law

9

Williams v. Walker-Thomas

9

Page 10: George Mason School of Law

10

Who was Ora Lee Williams?

10

Page 11: George Mason School of Law

11

Who was Ora Lee Williams?

If you had to describe her in one word, what would that word be?

Page 12: George Mason School of Law

12

Who brought the action?

What remedy was sought?

And who won at trial?

Page 13: George Mason School of Law

13

Who brought the action?

What remedy was sought?

Who won at the DC Court of Appeals?

Page 14: George Mason School of Law

14

Who brought the action?

What remedy was sought?

And who won in the DC Circuit?

Page 15: George Mason School of Law

15

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Page 16: George Mason School of Law

16

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Title to remain in seller until all goods paid for Walker-Thomas filed approximately 100

writs of replevin a year.

Page 17: George Mason School of Law

17

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Conditional Sale:

(Title) (Possession)Vendor Purchaser

Page 18: George Mason School of Law

18

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

UCC Article 9:

(Security Interest) (Possession)Secured Party Debtor

Page 19: George Mason School of Law

19

Do we have a problem with this?

Is secured lending a problem?

Page 20: George Mason School of Law

20

Do we have a problem with this?

Secured lending? UCC 9-201. General Validity of Security

Agreement. Except as otherwise provided by this Act, a security agreement* is effective according to its terms between the parties, against purchasers of the collateral and against creditors.

*A security agreement creates a security interest in collateral

Page 21: George Mason School of Law

21

And if the debtor defaults?

Page 22: George Mason School of Law

22

And if the debtor defaults?

Page 23: George Mason School of Law

23

And if the debtor defaults?

SP has the right to retake possession SP can resell and:

Account to debtor for surplus if the resale price exceeds the indebtedness

Sue for the deficiency if the resale price is less than the indebtedness

Page 24: George Mason School of Law

24

And if the debtor defaults?

In Williams v. Walker-Thomas, are we talking about a surplus or a deficiency?

Page 25: George Mason School of Law

25

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

What was the “rather obscure clause” that permitted Walker-Thomas to repossess Mrs. Williams’ bed.

Page 26: George Mason School of Law

26

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

How would you have drafted it?

Page 27: George Mason School of Law

27

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Do you think the Walker-Thomas lawyer was trying to hide the cross-collateral interest?

Page 28: George Mason School of Law

28

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Suppose that, on the first loan, Walker-Thomas had taken a security interest in all the assets she acquired subsequently (from anyone)?

Page 29: George Mason School of Law

29

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Suppose Walker-Thomas had taken a security interest in all the assets she acquired subsequently (from anyone)? UCC 9-204) After-acquired property (A)  … a security

agreement may create or provide for a security interest in after-acquired collateral. 

Page 30: George Mason School of Law

After-acquired CollateralCurrent assets financing

Inventory, Accounts receivable

30

Security Interest

Page 31: George Mason School of Law

31

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Suppose Walker-Thomas had specified on the first loan five years earlier that money lent (or credit extended) subsequently (future advances) would be secured by assets acquired in the past?

Page 32: George Mason School of Law

32

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

What about a security interest which secures moneys loaned subsequently (future advances)? UCC 9-204(3) Obligations covered by a

security agreement may include future advances or other value

Page 33: George Mason School of Law

33

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Future advances and line of credit loans

Collateral

Loan Loan

Page 34: George Mason School of Law

34

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

But no longer if consumer goods or household goods, under the UCC And why is that?

Page 35: George Mason School of Law

35

Substantive Unconscionability

Are there some bargains that are so vicious that they should be outlawed, even if the parties consent to them? How does one tell? Give me an example….

Page 36: George Mason School of Law

36

Substantive Unconscionability

Are there some bargains that are so vicious that they should be outlawed, even if the parties consent to them? Is Walker-Thomas an example of this?

Page 37: George Mason School of Law

37

Substantive Unconscionability

Why did Walker-Thomas insert the clause in the contract?

Page 38: George Mason School of Law

38

Substantive Unconscionability

Why might Mrs. Williams rationally have agreed to it?

Page 39: George Mason School of Law

39

Substantive Unconscionability

How would you expect Walker-Thomas to react if the clause is banned?

Page 40: George Mason School of Law

40

Substantive vs. Procedural Unconscionability

What’s the difference?

Page 41: George Mason School of Law

41

Substantive vs. Procedural Unconscionability

Substantive: The clause is never enforceable, even if agreed to consciously by a person of full capacity

Procedural: The clause is enforceable if agreed to consciously by a person of full capacity, but not otherwise

Page 42: George Mason School of Law

42

Substantive Unconscionability

Substantive: Ban all consumer cross-collateral clauses

Page 43: George Mason School of Law

43

Procedural Unconscionability

Is there a problem of procedural unconscionability in Walker-Thomas?

Page 44: George Mason School of Law

44

Procedural Unconscionability

Is there a problem of procedural unconscionability in Walker-Thomas?

Page 45: George Mason School of Law

In the DC Circuit: Skelly Wright

45

Where did he get the unconscionability doctrine from?

Page 46: George Mason School of Law

46

Was there an “absence of meaningful choice”?

Page 47: George Mason School of Law

47

Why didn’t she shop at Woodward & Lothrop?10 blocks from Walker-Thomas

Page 48: George Mason School of Law

48

Or Garfinckel’s? 11 Blocks from Walker-Thomas

Page 49: George Mason School of Law

49

What happened to Walker-Thomas? 1074 Seventh St. NW (at L)

49

When did it go dark, do you think?

Page 50: George Mason School of Law

50

Seventh Street NW, April 5, 1968What happened the day before?

Page 51: George Mason School of Law

51

An “absence of meaningful choice”?

To buy or not to buy?

Page 52: George Mason School of Law

52

An “absence of meaningful choice”?

Did it matter that she made the purchase in her house?

Page 53: George Mason School of Law

53

An “absence of meaningful choice”?

Is this how a monopolist would choose to exercise monopoly power?

Page 54: George Mason School of Law

54

“Gross inequality of bargaining power”

Is the inequality greater when you purchase at Macy’s?

Page 55: George Mason School of Law

55

“Gross inequality of bargaining power”

55

$12.99!!!

I think we can do better than that, don’t you?

“An absence of meaningful choice” unless we can dicker?

Page 56: George Mason School of Law

56

“Gross inequality of bargaining power”

Are purchases in the inner city intrinsically suspect? Let them shop at Garfinckels…for cake

Page 57: George Mason School of Law

57

Procedural Unconscionability

Is her poverty relevant? What were her financial resources?

Page 58: George Mason School of Law

58

Procedural Unconscionability

Is her poverty relevant? You mean we let poor people enter into

contracts!?!

Page 59: George Mason School of Law

59

Procedural Unconscionability

Do you want to argue that Mrs. Williams was a person of diminished capacity?

Page 60: George Mason School of Law

60

Procedural Unconscionability

Do you want to argue that Mrs. Williams was a person of diminished capacity? An “obvious … lack of education”?

Page 61: George Mason School of Law

61

Procedural Unconscionability

Do you think, as an empirical matter, that all people stand on the same footing when it comes to bargaining ability or judgment?

Page 62: George Mason School of Law

62

Procedural Unconscionability

Do you think, as an empirical matter, that all people stand on the same footing when it comes to bargaining ability or judgment? And would legal consequences follow

from this?

Page 63: George Mason School of Law

63

Did it matter what was purchased?

63

Page 64: George Mason School of Law

64

Did it matter what was purchased?

64

Suppose it had been a 10-year subscription to The New Republic?

Page 65: George Mason School of Law

65

Did it matter what was purchased?

65

“Man does not live by bread alone… He also needs strawberry jam.”Lionel Trilling

Page 66: George Mason School of Law

Should moral sentiments enter into it?

66

Page 67: George Mason School of Law

67

Procedural Unconscionability

Distinguish vices of capacity and vices of consent

Page 68: George Mason School of Law

68

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause?

Page 69: George Mason School of Law

69

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? And just why is that a big deal?

Page 70: George Mason School of Law

70

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? Should consent be conclusively

presumed if one signs a contract?

Page 71: George Mason School of Law

71

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? Should consent be conclusively

presumed if one signs a contract? If not, what’s the point of them?

Page 72: George Mason School of Law

72

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? Should consent be conclusively

presumed if one signs a contract? What if she was seen not to read the

contract?

Page 73: George Mason School of Law

73

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? Should consent be conclusively

presumed if one signs a contract? What about that “rather obscure clause”?

Page 74: George Mason School of Law

74

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? What about the size of the type? 4 point

Page 75: George Mason School of Law

75

Standard Form Contracts

Would Skelly Wright enforce any consumer contract based on a standard form? No “objective manifestation of consent”

75

Page 76: George Mason School of Law

76

Standard Form Contracts

Why do vendors employ them?

76

Page 77: George Mason School of Law

77

The Seven Children

Do they come into it?

77

Page 78: George Mason School of Law

78

What remedy was granted?

What would have happened on remand?

78

Page 79: George Mason School of Law

79

You’re Walker-Thomas

How do you react to the decision?

79

Page 80: George Mason School of Law

80

UCC 2-302: Does that clarify things?

§ 2-302. Unconscionable contract or Clause. (1) If the court as a matter of law finds

the contract or any clause of the contract to have been unconscionable at the time it was made the court may refuse to enforce the contract…

80

Page 81: George Mason School of Law

81

George Mason School of Law

Contracts I

II. DAY Why Enforce.ppt

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]

Page 82: George Mason School of Law

Alexandria

82

Page 83: George Mason School of Law

The Birchmere

83

Page 84: George Mason School of Law

Eden Center

84

Page 85: George Mason School of Law

Five Guys

85

Page 86: George Mason School of Law

Misha’s CoffeePatrick at King, Alexandria

86

Page 87: George Mason School of Law

National Arboretum

87

Page 88: George Mason School of Law

Across from the National Gallery

88

Page 89: George Mason School of Law

Behind the Jefferson Memorial

89

Page 90: George Mason School of Law

Arlington Library

90

Page 91: George Mason School of Law

91

Walker-Thomas Furniture Store1074 Seventh St. NW (at L)

91


Recommended