+ All Categories
Home > Documents > George Mason School of Law

George Mason School of Law

Date post: 08-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: talon
View: 35 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
George Mason School of Law. Contracts I Introduction F.H. Buckley [email protected]. Some housekeeping. LAW 102 (003), Thursdays 6:00 – 7:40 pm First part of a distinct two part series of courses on contract law. 2. Some housekeeping. Contracts I Theoretical Introduction Formation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
97
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Introduction F.H. Buckley [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: George Mason School of Law

1

George Mason School of Law

Contracts I

Introduction

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]

Page 2: George Mason School of Law

2

Some housekeeping

LAW 102 (003), Thursdays 6:00 – 7:40 pm

First part of a distinct two part series of courses on contract law

2

Page 3: George Mason School of Law

3

Some housekeeping

Contracts I Theoretical Introduction Formation Relational Contracts

3

Page 4: George Mason School of Law

4

Some housekeeping

Contracts II Why we shouldn’t enforce: Fraud etc. What’s in the contract: Terms, Conditions Excuses: Mistake/Frustration Remedies

4

Page 5: George Mason School of Law

5

Some housekeeping

The exam: Open Code

Optional upgrade based on classroom performance

Why I don’t give practice exams

5

Page 6: George Mason School of Law

6

Some housekeeping

The structure of the casebook

6

Page 7: George Mason School of Law

7

On learning with new technology

There’s thing thing called Wikipedia

GMU Library resources J for JSTOR InPrimo

What this does (or should do) to teaching

7

Page 8: George Mason School of Law

8

On absorbing the material

By verbalizing?

Numbers, stories and pictures

8

Page 9: George Mason School of Law

9

The name of a case (case citation)

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.

Page 10: George Mason School of Law

10

Williams at 53

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals

198 A.2d 914 (1964)

Page 11: George Mason School of Law

11

The procedural aspect

Who is suing?

And what remedy is sought? Cf. Maitland on the forms of action

Page 12: George Mason School of Law

12

How did it end up here?

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

350 F.2d 445 (1965)

Page 13: George Mason School of Law

13

Who was Ora Lee Williams?

13

Page 14: George Mason School of Law

14

Who was Ora Lee Williams?

If you had to describe her in one word, what would that word be?

Page 15: George Mason School of Law

15

Walker-Thomas Furniture Store1074 Seventh St. NW (at L)

15

Page 16: George Mason School of Law

16

Williams v. Walker-Thomas

16

Page 17: George Mason School of Law

17

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Page 18: George Mason School of Law

18

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Title to remain in seller until all goods paid for

Page 19: George Mason School of Law

19

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Conditional Sale:

(Title) (Possession)Vendor Purchaser

Page 20: George Mason School of Law

20

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

UCC Article 9:

(Security Interest) (Possession)Secured Party Debtor

Page 21: George Mason School of Law

21

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Title to remain in seller until all goods paid for Does it matter that Walker-Thomas filed

approximately 100 writs of replevin a year?

Page 22: George Mason School of Law

22

Do we have a problem with this?

Is secured lending a problem?

Page 23: George Mason School of Law

23

Do we have a problem with this?

Secured lending? UCC 9-201. General Validity of Security

Agreement. Except as otherwise provided by this Act, a security agreement* is effective according to its terms between the parties, against purchasers of the collateral and against creditors.

*A security agreement creates a security interest in collateral

Page 24: George Mason School of Law

24

And if the debtor defaults?

Page 25: George Mason School of Law

25

And if the debtor defaults?

Page 26: George Mason School of Law

26

And if the debtor defaults?

SP has the right to retake possession SP can resell and:

Account to debtor for surplus if the resale price exceeds the indebtedness

Sue for the deficiency if the resale price is less than the indebtedness

Page 27: George Mason School of Law

27

And if the debtor defaults?

In Williams v. Walker-Thomas, are we talking about a surplus or a deficiency?

Page 28: George Mason School of Law

28

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

What was the “rather obscure clause” that permitted Walker-Thomas to repossess Mrs. Williams’ bed.

Page 29: George Mason School of Law

29

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

How would you have drafted the clause?

Page 30: George Mason School of Law

30

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Suppose that, on the first loan, Walker-Thomas had taken a security interest in all the assets she acquired subsequently (from anyone)?

Page 31: George Mason School of Law

31

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

Suppose Walker-Thomas had taken a security interest in all the assets she acquired subsequently (from anyone)? UCC 9-204: After-acquired property (A)  … a

security agreement may create or provide for a security interest in after-acquired collateral. 

Page 32: George Mason School of Law

After-acquired CollateralCurrent assets financing

Inventory, Accounts receivable

32

Security Interest

Page 33: George Mason School of Law

33

What gave Walker-Thomas a right of replevin?

But cf. 9-204(b)(1) A security interest does not attach under a term constituting an after-acquired property clause to consumer goods Why is that?

Page 34: George Mason School of Law

34

Quinn on vitiating factors

What is the difference between “a lack of meeting of the minds” and “contracts against public policy,” per Quinn J.

Page 35: George Mason School of Law

35

Substantive vs. Procedural Unconscionability

No “meeting of the minds” a matter of procedural unconscionability

But there’s still a question of substantive unconscionability

Page 36: George Mason School of Law

36

Substantive vs. Procedural Unconscionability

Substantive: The clause is never enforceable, even if agreed to consciously by a person of full capacity

Procedural: The clause is enforceable if agreed to consciously by a person of full capacity, but not otherwise

Page 37: George Mason School of Law

37

Substantive Unconscionability

Are there some bargains that are so vicious that they should be outlawed, even if the parties consent to them? How does one tell? Give me an example….

Page 38: George Mason School of Law

38

Substantive Unconscionability

Are there some bargains that are so vicious that they should be outlawed, even if the parties consent to them? Is Walker-Thomas an example of this?

Page 39: George Mason School of Law

39

Recall UCC § 9-204(b)(1)

A security interest does not attach under a term constituting an after-acquired property clause to consumer goods

Page 40: George Mason School of Law

40

Substantive Unconscionability

Why did Walker-Thomas insert the clause in the contract? Can you think why Walker-Thomas might

want a right to repossess five year old household junk?

Page 41: George Mason School of Law

41

Substantive Unconscionability

Aquinas on the just price Leff on “Thomist Unconscionability”

Page 42: George Mason School of Law

42

Substantive Unconscionability

When you say you are troubled by a contract, as a matter of public policy, just what have you said?

Page 43: George Mason School of Law

43

Procedural Unconscionability and Williams

Don’t enforce if there is no “meeting of the minds”

Page 44: George Mason School of Law

44

Procedural Unconscionability

A meeting of the minds? Why might Mrs. Williams rationally have

agreed to the clause?

Page 45: George Mason School of Law

45

Procedural Unconscionability

How would you expect Walker-Thomas to react if the clause is banned?

Page 46: George Mason School of Law

46

So what kind of unconscionability are we talking about in Walker-Thomas?

Page 47: George Mason School of Law

In the DC Circuit: Skelly Wright

47

Where did he get the unconscionability doctrine from?

Page 48: George Mason School of Law

48

What do you infer from the subsequent adoption of UCC § 2-302(1)?

If the court as a matter of law finds the contract or any clause of the contract to have been unconscionable at the time it was made the court may refuse to enforce the contract, or it may enforce the remainder of the contract without the unconscionable clause, or it may so limit the application of any unconscionable clause as to avoid any unconscionable result.

Page 49: George Mason School of Law

49

Was there an “absence of meaningful choice”?

Page 50: George Mason School of Law

50

Why didn’t she shop at Woodward & Lothrop?10 blocks from Walker-Thomas

Page 51: George Mason School of Law

51

Or Garfinckel’s? 11 Blocks from Walker-Thomas

Page 52: George Mason School of Law

52

What happened to Walker-Thomas? 1074 Seventh St. NW (at L)

52

When did it go dark, do you think?

Page 53: George Mason School of Law

53

Seventh Street NW, April 5, 1968What happened the day before?

Page 54: George Mason School of Law

54

An “absence of meaningful choice”?

To buy or not to buy?

Page 55: George Mason School of Law

55

An “absence of meaningful choice”?

Did it matter that she made the purchase in her house?

Page 56: George Mason School of Law

56

“Gross inequality of bargaining power”

Is the inequality greater when you purchase at Macy’s?

Page 57: George Mason School of Law

57

“Gross inequality of bargaining power”

57

OMG!!!

$12.99!!!

I think we can do better than that, don’t you?

“An absence of meaningful choice” unless we can dicker?

Page 58: George Mason School of Law

58

“Gross inequality of bargaining power”

If there is inequality, how would you expect the merchant to exploit his power?

Page 59: George Mason School of Law

59

Procedural Unconscionability

Is her poverty relevant?

Page 60: George Mason School of Law

60

Procedural Unconscionability

Is her poverty relevant? You mean we let poor people enter into

contracts!?!

Page 61: George Mason School of Law

61

Procedural Unconscionability

Do you want to argue that Mrs. Williams was a person of diminished capacity?

Page 62: George Mason School of Law

62

Procedural Unconscionability

Do you want to argue that Mrs. Williams was a person of diminished capacity? An “obvious … lack of education”?

Page 63: George Mason School of Law

63

Procedural Unconscionability

Do you think, as an empirical matter, that all people stand on the same footing when it comes to bargaining ability or judgment?

Page 64: George Mason School of Law

64

Procedural Unconscionability

Do you think, as an empirical matter, that all people stand on the same footing when it comes to bargaining ability or judgment? And would legal consequences follow

from this?

Page 65: George Mason School of Law

65

Corrective and Distributive Justice

How would you decide the case as a matter of corrective justice? Of distributive justice?

Page 66: George Mason School of Law

66

Distributive Justice

How would Aristotle allocate goods as a matter of distributive justice?

Page 67: George Mason School of Law

67

Distributive Justice

How would Aristotle allocate goods as a matter of distributive justice?

And what is merit?

Page 68: George Mason School of Law

68

Corrective JusticeHow would this apply in contract law?

This kind of injustice being an inequality, the judge tries to equalize it; for in the case also in which one has received and the other has inflicted a wound, or one has slain and the other been slain, the suffering and the action have been unequally distributed; but the judge tries to equalize by means of the penalty, taking away from the gain of the assailant….

Page 69: George Mason School of Law

69

Corrective JusticeHow would this apply in contract law?

These names, both loss and gain, have come from voluntary exchange; for to have more than one's own is called gaining, and to have less than one's original share is called losing, e.g. in buying and selling and in all other matters in which the law has left people free to make their own terms; but when they get neither more nor less but just what belongs to themselves, they say that they have their own and that they neither lose nor gain.

Therefore the just is intermediate between a sort of gain and a sort of loss, viz. those which are involuntary; it consists in having an equal amount before and after the transaction.

Page 70: George Mason School of Law

70

Corrective JusticeHow would this apply in contract law?

Suppose we abandon the idea of zero-sum transactions, and apply the idea of corrective justice to fraud or unconscionability?

Page 71: George Mason School of Law

71

Did it matter what was purchased?

71

Page 72: George Mason School of Law

72

Did it matter what was purchased?

72

Suppose it had been a 10-year subscription to The New Republic?

Page 73: George Mason School of Law

73

Did it matter what was purchased?

73

“Man does not live by bread alone… He also needs strawberry jam.”Lionel Trilling

Page 74: George Mason School of Law

74

Procedural Unconscionability

Distinguish vices of capacity and vices of consent

Page 75: George Mason School of Law

75

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause?

Page 76: George Mason School of Law

76

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? And just why is a meeting of the minds a

big deal?

Page 77: George Mason School of Law

77

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? Should consent be conclusively

presumed if one signs a contract?

Page 78: George Mason School of Law

78

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? Should consent be conclusively

presumed if one signs a contract? If not, what’s the point of them?

Page 79: George Mason School of Law

79

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? Should consent be conclusively

presumed if one signs a contract? What if she was seen not to read the

contract?

Page 80: George Mason School of Law

80

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? Should consent be conclusively

presumed if one signs a contract? What about that “rather obscure clause”?

Page 81: George Mason School of Law

81

Procedural Unconscionability

Did she give her consent to the clause? What about the size of the type? 4 point

Page 82: George Mason School of Law

82

Standard Form Contracts

Would Skelly Wright enforce any consumer contract based on a standard form? No “objective manifestation of consent”

82

Page 83: George Mason School of Law

83

Standard Form Contracts

Why do vendors employ them?

83

Page 84: George Mason School of Law

84

The Seven Children

Do they come into it?

84

Page 85: George Mason School of Law

85

What remedy was granted?

What would have happened on remand?

85

Page 86: George Mason School of Law

86

You’re Walker-Thomas

How do you react to the decision?

86

Page 87: George Mason School of Law

87

UCC 2-302: Does that clarify things?

§ 2-302. Unconscionable contract or Clause. (1) If the court as a matter of law finds

the contract or any clause of the contract to have been unconscionable at the time it was made the court may refuse to enforce the contract…

87

Page 88: George Mason School of Law

Forget GeorgetownAlexandria

88

Page 89: George Mason School of Law

Best local clubThe Birchmere

89

Page 90: George Mason School of Law

Best BurgersFive Guys

90

Page 91: George Mason School of Law

Best PhoEden Center, Wilson Bvld. At Seven Corners

91

Page 92: George Mason School of Law

Best EthiopianBati on George Mason off King Street

92

Page 93: George Mason School of Law

Best FelafelBusboys and Poets in Shirlington

93

Page 94: George Mason School of Law

National Arboretum

94

Page 95: George Mason School of Law

Arlington LibraryThree blocks west

95

Page 96: George Mason School of Law

The principal tourist attractionBehind the Jefferson Memorial

96

Page 97: George Mason School of Law

97

The next best tourist attraction1074 Seventh St. NW (at L)

97


Recommended