+ All Categories
Home > Documents > George Mason School of Law

George Mason School of Law

Date post: 15-Mar-2016
Category:
Upload: graham-harding
View: 32 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
George Mason School of Law. Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives This file may be downloaded only by registered students in my class, and may not be shared by them F.H. Buckley [email protected]. Next day. This week. Reliance Restitution Punitives Lost-volume seller. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
90
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives This file may be downloaded only by registered students in my class, and may not be shared by them F.H. Buckley [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: George Mason School of Law

1

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Reliance/Restitution/PunitivesThis file may be downloaded only by registered students in my class,

and may not be shared by them

F.H. [email protected]

Page 2: George Mason School of Law

Next day

2

Page 3: George Mason School of Law

This week

Reliance Restitution Punitives Lost-volume seller

3

Page 4: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages If damages are meant to compensate

for a wrong, just what is the wrong? Failure to perform: Expectation damages Inviting detrimental reliance: reliance

damages

4

Page 5: George Mason School of Law

The interplay of the measures of damages

1. When might reliance damages exceed expectation damages?

2. When might damages be limited to the reliance measure?

5

Page 6: George Mason School of Law

Could reliance damages exceed the expectation measure?

When would a Π want more than expectation damages?

6

Page 7: George Mason School of Law

Could reliance damages exceed the expectation measure?

When would a Π want more than expectation damages? Bad bargains

7

Page 8: George Mason School of Law

Could reliance damages exceed the expectation measure?

When would a Π want more than expectation damages? Bad bargains Restrictions on the expectation measure

Uncertainty Forseeability

8

Page 9: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

When would the Π prefer reliance damages? Should the Π have the option in such

cases?

9

Page 10: George Mason School of Law

Freund at 95

Semble reliance damages not to exceed the expectation interest, or else a windfall

10

Page 11: George Mason School of Law

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages?

11

Page 12: George Mason School of Law

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages?

Contracts with Physicians Hawkins v. McGee at 892

12

Page 13: George Mason School of Law

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages?

Hawkins v. McGee at 892 Was the doctor negligent?

13

Page 14: George Mason School of Law

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages?

Hawkins v. McGee at 892 Was the doctor negligent?

Had he been negligent, what would the damages have been?

14

Page 15: George Mason School of Law

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages?

Hawkins v. McGee at 892 Was the doctor negligent?

Had he been negligent, what would the damages have been? Return of doctor’s fee Pain and suffering from the operation Difference between the before-and-after hand

15

Page 16: George Mason School of Law

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages?

Hawkins v. McGee at 892 Was the doctor negligent?

In short, reliance damages Return of doctor’s fee Pain and suffering from the operation Difference between the before-and-after hand

16

Page 17: George Mason School of Law

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages?

Hawkins v. McGee at 892 What did the court award?

17

Page 18: George Mason School of Law

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages?

Hawkins v. McGee at 892 What did the court award? The difference between the hand as

promised and the hand after the operation less the doctor’s fee

18

Page 19: George Mason School of Law

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages?

Hawkins v. McGee at 892 What did the court award? The difference between the hand as

promised and the hand after the operation less the doctor’s fee

I.e., The expectation interest

19

Page 20: George Mason School of Law

Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor at 890?

20

Page 21: George Mason School of Law

Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor at 890?

What did the judge instruct the jury?

21

Page 22: George Mason School of Law

Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor at 890?

What did the judge instruct the jury? Out of pocket expenses incident to the

operation Damages for the way in which the nose

was made worse Pain and suffering for the third operation Loss of earnings too uncertain

22

Page 23: George Mason School of Law

Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor at 890?

What didn’t the Π ask for the difference between the nose as promised and delivered?

23

Page 24: George Mason School of Law

Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor at 890?

What didn’t the Π ask for the difference between the nose as promised and delivered? Was this really a case which denied the

expectation measure?

24

Page 25: George Mason School of Law

Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor at 890?

What didn’t the Π ask for the difference between the nose as promised and delivered? Can one generalize this to all non-

commercial cases, as Fuller and Perdue argue at 894?

25

Page 26: George Mason School of Law

Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor at 890?

What didn’t the Π ask for the difference between the nose as promised and delivered? Can one generalize this to all non-

commercial cases, as Fuller and Perdue argue at 894? What is the link between Pond v. Harris and

Smith v. Sherman in n. 6?

26

Page 27: George Mason School of Law

Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor at 890?

What didn’t the Π ask for the difference between the nose as promised and delivered? Could a court award damages for pain and

suffering and emotional distress in contract?

27

Page 28: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster

28Robert Stack as Eliot Ness

Page 29: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster The FBI invited college graduates to work

as clerical staff because of the possibility of receiving preferential consideration as special agents

29

Page 30: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster The FBI invited college graduates to work as

clerical staff because of the possibility of receiving preferential consideration as special agents

The FBI stopped the program in 1977 because (1) they weren’t getting qualified people, and (2) the FBI wanted to institute an affirmative action program.

30

Page 31: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument?

31

Page 32: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? Reversed on appeal

32

Page 33: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

33

Page 34: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

What are the problems with expectation damages here?

34

Page 35: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

What are the problems with expectation damages here? Uncertainty FBI’s right to terminate

35

Page 36: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

Do expectation damages place a ceiling on reliance damages?

36

Page 37: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

Do expectation damages place a ceiling on reliance damages?

Albert v. Armstrong at 901

37

Page 38: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

Do expectation damages place a ceiling on reliance damages?

Albert v. Armstrong at 901 What might have given Armstrong the option to

sue for reliance damages, and how were they limited?

38

Page 39: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

Do expectation damages place a ceiling on reliance damages? Yes—but no proof that a bad bargain and onus

was on the FBI

39

Page 40: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

So what are the reliance damages?

40

Page 41: George Mason School of Law

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

So what are the reliance damages? The difference between what they received as

FBI employees (and for a year afterwards) and what they would have received in the labor market, plus dislocation

41

Page 42: George Mason School of Law

Reliance damages and uncertainty of the expectation

1. The expectation interest is sizable but uncertain

2. The expectation interest is likely trivial but uncertain

Cf. Restatement 349, Comment a

42

Page 43: George Mason School of Law

Reliance damages and uncertainty of the expectation

Wartzman v. Hightower at 901

43

Page 44: George Mason School of Law

Reliance damages and uncertainty of the expectation

Wartzman v. Hightower at 901

Why a problem with expectation damages?

44

Page 45: George Mason School of Law

Reliance damages and uncertainty of the expectation

Anglia v. Reed 902

45

Robert Reed, The Brady Bunch

Page 46: George Mason School of Law

Anglia v. Reed

What was the problem with expectation damages?

If expectation damages are speculative, could any reliance damages be awarded?

46

Page 47: George Mason School of Law

Anglia v. Reed

What was the problem with expectation damages?

If expectation damages are speculative, could any reliance damages be awarded? Both pre- and post-contract reliance

damages awarded

47

Page 48: George Mason School of Law

Restitution or Unjust Enrichment

A general principle of restitution out of Quasi Contract, Money had and received, breach of fiduciary duty

48

Page 49: George Mason School of Law

Bailey v. West

49

When is quasi-contractual liability imposed? Benefit conferred on defendant by

plaintiff Appreciation by defendant of the benefit It would be inequitable to permit the

defendant to retain the benefit

Page 50: George Mason School of Law

Restitution

Bailey v. West p. 5 What should the Πs have done with the

horse? No recovery for officious intermeddler

50

Page 51: George Mason School of Law

Restitution

Bailey v. West p. 5 What should the Πs have done with the

horse? No recovery for officious intermeddler But that problem doesn’t arise when

restitution is sought as a remedy in contract

51

Page 52: George Mason School of Law

Zara Contracting at 903

52Tri-cities Airport, Endicott NY

Page 53: George Mason School of Law

Zara Contracting

53

Zara contracts with US gov’t to build an airport

Zara subcontracts the entire job to Π Two months after Π begins work, Zara

wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself.

Page 54: George Mason School of Law

Zara Contracting

54

Zara contracts with US gov’t to build an airport

Zara subcontracts the entire job to Π Two months after Π begins work, Zara

wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself.

How does the Miller Act work?

Page 55: George Mason School of Law

Zara Contracting

55

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. Would expectation damages include a

claim for the value of the extra work done?

Page 56: George Mason School of Law

Zara Contracting

56

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. Would expectation damages include a

claim for the value of the extra work done? No: clause 5 of the agreement

Page 57: George Mason School of Law

Zara Contracting

57

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. Would expectation damages include a

claim for the value of the extra work done?

So a restitutionary recovery would give the Π more than the expectation award. And what is the basis for such a claim?

Page 58: George Mason School of Law

Zara Contracting

58

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. The innocent party’s option

Value of work done at contract rate Or Quantum meruit for value of work done

(more than contract rate as the work was harder than expected)

Page 59: George Mason School of Law

Zara Contracting

59

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. How to calculate quantum meruit

What would a third party have charged Note the extra claim by Zara against the US.

Page 60: George Mason School of Law

Zara Contracting

60

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. How to calculate quantum meruit

What would a third party have charged Cf. Restatement 371, illustration 2

Page 61: George Mason School of Law

Zara Contracting

61

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. Quantum meruit for value of work done

(more than contract rate as the work was harder than expected)? Contrast Palmer Construction at 909

Qu. Breachers vs. non-breachers Restatement 373(1)

Page 62: George Mason School of Law

Britton v. Turner at 906

62

Who was the party in breach?

Page 63: George Mason School of Law

Can restitution damages exceed expectation damages?

Britton v. Turner 906 What would expectation damages

amount to?

63

Page 64: George Mason School of Law

Can restitution damages exceed expectation damages?

Britton v. Turner What is the argument for quantum

meruit?

64

Page 65: George Mason School of Law

Can restitution damages exceed expectation damages?

Britton v. Turner What is the argument for quantum

meruit? Aliter a temptation to strategic behavior

by the employer?

65

Page 66: George Mason School of Law

Can restitution damages exceed expectation damages?

Britton v. Turner What would quantum meruit give the Π? Aliter a temptation to strategic behavior

by the employer? Can the employer bargain around this?

66

Page 67: George Mason School of Law

Can restitution damages exceed expectation damages?

Britton v. Turner What would quantum meruit give the Π? Aliter a temptation to strategic behavior

by the employer? What if the court had found that Turner

had been enriched by $150? See Restatement 373, comment d

67

Page 68: George Mason School of Law

Ventura v. Titan 910

68Gov. Jesse Ventura (Ind. MN)

Page 69: George Mason School of Law

Punitives: Do compensatory damages undercompensate?

The American rule of costs chills meritorious actions (and encourages frivolous ones)

Small dollar claims might not be brought But class actions remedy this

And then some?

69

Page 70: George Mason School of Law

Do compensatory damages undercompensate?

If they do, an argument for punitive damages?

70

Page 71: George Mason School of Law

OMG! We’re not suing enough!Aust. Canada France Japan U.K. U.S.

Suits/100,000 1,542 1,450 2,416 1,768 3,681 5,806

71

Page 72: George Mason School of Law

Do compensatory damages undercompensate?

Hibschman Pontiac at 912

72

Page 73: George Mason School of Law

What does a Chevy Volt want to be?

73

Page 74: George Mason School of Law

It wants to be a Pontiac GTO!!!!

74

Page 75: George Mason School of Law

Little GTOLittle GTO, you're really lookin' fine

Three deuces and a four-speed and a 389Listen to her tachin' up now, listen to her whineC'mon and turn it on, wind it up, blow it out GTO

Wa-wa, wa, wa, wa, wa, wa, (mixed with "Yeah, yeah, little GTO")

Wa-wa, wa, wa, wa, wa, wa, (mixed with "Yeah, yeah, little GTO")

Wa-wa wa, wa, wa, wa, wa, wa (mixed with "Ahhh, little GTO")

Page 76: George Mason School of Law

Do damagesundercompensate?

What was needed to rebut the presumption against punitive damages in contract?

76

Page 77: George Mason School of Law

Do damagesundercompensate?

What was the “malice, fraud, gross negligence and oppressive conduct”? As opposed to a simple breach of

contract…

77

Page 78: George Mason School of Law

Do damages undercompensate?

What was the “malice, fraud, gross negligence and oppressive conduct”? As opposed to a simple breach of

contract… Did the Π independently establish a

common law tort? Or just have elements of fraud, malice

etc mingle in the controversy

78

Page 79: George Mason School of Law

Do damages undercompensate?

The jury awarded punitive damages assessed at 10 times the compensatory damages When is the “first blush” rule triggered?

79

Page 80: George Mason School of Law

Do damages overdeter?

Suppose you’re a potential Δ. Are you made whole by a finding of no liability?

80

Page 81: George Mason School of Law

Miller Brewing at 916

Best Beers a distributor for Miller for 30 years

Was the termination wrongful? Was Miller animated by something other

than its business interests?

81

Page 82: George Mason School of Law

Miller Brewing

The court found that Monroe Beverage’s performance was in some ways inferior to Best Beers. Is this relevant?

82

Page 83: George Mason School of Law

Miller Brewing

Is Hibschman Pontiac overturned? The need for an independent common

law tort.

83

Page 84: George Mason School of Law

Do damages overdeter?

Imagine the argument to the jury in Miller Brewing They’re so rich, they won’t notice unless

you make it hurt

84

Page 85: George Mason School of Law

Do damages overdeter?

Interstate Exploitation Suppose state A was permitted to

impose a tax on citizens of state B…

85

Page 86: George Mason School of Law

The Pinto Case 922

Ford did not make a safety improvement which would have solved the problem because it did not think this cost effective, given the expected value of the accident In doing so, it valued a life as worth $2M Does this deserve punitive damages?

86

Page 87: George Mason School of Law

The Backlash

Kozinski in Oki America at 922

87

Page 88: George Mason School of Law

The Backlash

Efficient breaches: Thyssen at 923

88

Page 89: George Mason School of Law

The Backlash

State Farm and presumptive caps at 925

89

Page 90: George Mason School of Law

The Backlash

Cooter at 924 on intentional misbehavior Qu. opportunistic breaches

90


Recommended