Date post: | 07-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | sharad-sharma |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 12
8/4/2019 German Pharma
1/12
German Pharmaceuticals
8/4/2019 German Pharma
2/12
Agenda
The Background
A view of Employee Involvement
Programme
A battle between Proactive workers vs.
Reactive managers
The denial of Board membership to unions
The demise of New HRM Experiment
8/4/2019 German Pharma
3/12
German Pharmaceuticals The Background
A multinational firm engaged in the drugs and pharmaceuticals business.
A plant on the outskirts of Bombay and regional and zonal offices throughout India
The Workers were organized and had an independent, company-based union; the
union was in the drivers seat, controlling output and leveraging this control to press
its demands
The Managing director (MD) decided to experiment with small group activity for
better productivity and improved relations
The MD Launched an employee involvement programme for shop-floor issues
To improve productivity, the MD wanted small groups made up of empoweredworkers, supervisors, and middle managers so that work-related decisions get
taken by these groups.
8/4/2019 German Pharma
4/12
Top Management - was not against this experiment.
Viewed it as a distant shop-floor process, which neither made a demand on them nor
posed a threat to their powers.
Middle Management - was not in favor of empoweringworkers.
Viewed that empowering workers would not be of any benefit for the organization.
However, not being an organized group they could not stall the process
Employee Involvement Programme
8/4/2019 German Pharma
5/12
Workers - were neutral.
Had no reason not to be supportive.
Were at the receiving end of orders, whether from the managers or from their own
union So, they were for the first time getting an opportunity to speak out.
Union - no interest at all in shop-floor empowerment.
Agreed that poor productivity could result into losses and put jobs in jeopardy,
However, attributed every problem to bad management
Wanted no responsibility either for themselves or for their members in improving
productivity, but expected their pronouncements on distant managerial issues to be
taken seriously.
Later agreed and saw in work groups the opportunity to put shop-floor managers on
the mat.
Employee Involvement Programme
8/4/2019 German Pharma
6/12
So the middle managers stone-walled the discussions on quality and productivity
as raised by workers.
Workers Wanted to be on workstations, as they were getting an opportunity to speak.
The programme enabled them to bring many topics on table such as poor or
wasteful manufacturing practices, quality problems, wasted materials, machine
breakdowns, and the like.
Middle managers
Were rarely enthusiastic about shop- floor empowerment
Were unsure about their powers; did not quite know how far they could go in
supporting a decision
So the middle managers stone-walled the discussions on quality and productivity
as raised by workers.
PROACTIVE Workers v/s REACTIVE Managers
After initial small decisions, problems began to surface in workstations between Managers and Workers
8/4/2019 German Pharma
7/12
The union demanded board membership while the MD was not willing to offer
the same to the union representatives.
Historically:
The union used to believe that continuous struggle is the fountain-head of
employee well-being The union leaders attributed every problem to bad management
Currently:
The union just wanted to scuttle the proceedings for setting up workstations and
shop councils
Technically:
A board of directors is a body of elected or appointed members who jointly
oversee the activities of a company or organization
Board Membership
8/4/2019 German Pharma
8/12
The union demanded board membership while the MD was not willing to offer
the same to the union representatives.
Duties of Board:
Governing the organization by establishing broad policies and objectives
Selecting, appointing, supporting and reviewing the performance of the chief
executive
Ensuring the availability of adequate financial resources
Approving annual budgets
Accounting to the stakeholders for the organization's performance
Setting their own salaries and compensation
Law:
Directors exercise control and management over the organization
Organizations are run for the benefit of the shareholders
The law imposes restrictions on selection of directors
Board Membership (contd.)
8/4/2019 German Pharma
9/12
Issues in the NewExperiment
The new experiment of management of human resources (HRM) at thecompany came to an end.
Perception:
Middle managers did not think that empowered workers would be up to
any good
The union secretary thought the objective of the entire scheme was to
sideline him and wanted no restriction on union freedom to nominate
anyone to shop councils
Motivation:
The union had no interest at all in shop-floor empowerment
The union leaders wanted no responsibility either for themselves or for
their members in improving productivity, but expected that their
pronouncements on distant managerial issues be taken seriously
8/4/2019 German Pharma
10/12
Issues in the NewExperiment (contd.)
The new experiment of management of
human resources (HRM) at t
hecompany came to an end.
Problems:
Middle managers used to stonewall discussion related to quality and
productivity - their disinterest showing in the lack of preparation for
workstation meetings
Most middle managers were unsure of their powers and did not quite
know how far they could go in supporting a decision taken by senior
managers
Middle and senior managers were safely ensconced in enclaves of
privilege, leaving those lower down to battle it out in workstations
The union saw workstations as a channel of cooperation, which weakened
labours resolve and diminished its ability to fight industrial relations
battles
8/4/2019 German Pharma
11/12
The new experiment of management of human resources (HRM) at the
company came to an end.
Examples:
A section chief blocked the suggestion for a hydraulic lift because his vice-
president thought it absurd for a labour surplus company to invest in a
labour-saving device
Departmental heads were supposed to be on shop councils, discussing with
union nominees the issues of quality, safety, and productivity, but not a
single council met in six months although workstations referred plenty of
unresolved issues to them
While managers took no initiative, the union did not even name itsrepresentatives to the councils
Senior managers expected workstations and shop councils to enhance
productivity and contribute to trust relations without themselves making
any contribution to the process
Issues in the NewExperiment (contd.)
8/4/2019 German Pharma
12/12
Thank youThank you