+ All Categories
Home > Documents > German Pharma

German Pharma

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: sharad-sharma
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 12

Transcript
  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    1/12

    German Pharmaceuticals

  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    2/12

    Agenda

    The Background

    A view of Employee Involvement

    Programme

    A battle between Proactive workers vs.

    Reactive managers

    The denial of Board membership to unions

    The demise of New HRM Experiment

  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    3/12

    German Pharmaceuticals The Background

    A multinational firm engaged in the drugs and pharmaceuticals business.

    A plant on the outskirts of Bombay and regional and zonal offices throughout India

    The Workers were organized and had an independent, company-based union; the

    union was in the drivers seat, controlling output and leveraging this control to press

    its demands

    The Managing director (MD) decided to experiment with small group activity for

    better productivity and improved relations

    The MD Launched an employee involvement programme for shop-floor issues

    To improve productivity, the MD wanted small groups made up of empoweredworkers, supervisors, and middle managers so that work-related decisions get

    taken by these groups.

  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    4/12

    Top Management - was not against this experiment.

    Viewed it as a distant shop-floor process, which neither made a demand on them nor

    posed a threat to their powers.

    Middle Management - was not in favor of empoweringworkers.

    Viewed that empowering workers would not be of any benefit for the organization.

    However, not being an organized group they could not stall the process

    Employee Involvement Programme

  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    5/12

    Workers - were neutral.

    Had no reason not to be supportive.

    Were at the receiving end of orders, whether from the managers or from their own

    union So, they were for the first time getting an opportunity to speak out.

    Union - no interest at all in shop-floor empowerment.

    Agreed that poor productivity could result into losses and put jobs in jeopardy,

    However, attributed every problem to bad management

    Wanted no responsibility either for themselves or for their members in improving

    productivity, but expected their pronouncements on distant managerial issues to be

    taken seriously.

    Later agreed and saw in work groups the opportunity to put shop-floor managers on

    the mat.

    Employee Involvement Programme

  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    6/12

    So the middle managers stone-walled the discussions on quality and productivity

    as raised by workers.

    Workers Wanted to be on workstations, as they were getting an opportunity to speak.

    The programme enabled them to bring many topics on table such as poor or

    wasteful manufacturing practices, quality problems, wasted materials, machine

    breakdowns, and the like.

    Middle managers

    Were rarely enthusiastic about shop- floor empowerment

    Were unsure about their powers; did not quite know how far they could go in

    supporting a decision

    So the middle managers stone-walled the discussions on quality and productivity

    as raised by workers.

    PROACTIVE Workers v/s REACTIVE Managers

    After initial small decisions, problems began to surface in workstations between Managers and Workers

  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    7/12

    The union demanded board membership while the MD was not willing to offer

    the same to the union representatives.

    Historically:

    The union used to believe that continuous struggle is the fountain-head of

    employee well-being The union leaders attributed every problem to bad management

    Currently:

    The union just wanted to scuttle the proceedings for setting up workstations and

    shop councils

    Technically:

    A board of directors is a body of elected or appointed members who jointly

    oversee the activities of a company or organization

    Board Membership

  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    8/12

    The union demanded board membership while the MD was not willing to offer

    the same to the union representatives.

    Duties of Board:

    Governing the organization by establishing broad policies and objectives

    Selecting, appointing, supporting and reviewing the performance of the chief

    executive

    Ensuring the availability of adequate financial resources

    Approving annual budgets

    Accounting to the stakeholders for the organization's performance

    Setting their own salaries and compensation

    Law:

    Directors exercise control and management over the organization

    Organizations are run for the benefit of the shareholders

    The law imposes restrictions on selection of directors

    Board Membership (contd.)

  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    9/12

    Issues in the NewExperiment

    The new experiment of management of human resources (HRM) at thecompany came to an end.

    Perception:

    Middle managers did not think that empowered workers would be up to

    any good

    The union secretary thought the objective of the entire scheme was to

    sideline him and wanted no restriction on union freedom to nominate

    anyone to shop councils

    Motivation:

    The union had no interest at all in shop-floor empowerment

    The union leaders wanted no responsibility either for themselves or for

    their members in improving productivity, but expected that their

    pronouncements on distant managerial issues be taken seriously

  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    10/12

    Issues in the NewExperiment (contd.)

    The new experiment of management of

    human resources (HRM) at t

    hecompany came to an end.

    Problems:

    Middle managers used to stonewall discussion related to quality and

    productivity - their disinterest showing in the lack of preparation for

    workstation meetings

    Most middle managers were unsure of their powers and did not quite

    know how far they could go in supporting a decision taken by senior

    managers

    Middle and senior managers were safely ensconced in enclaves of

    privilege, leaving those lower down to battle it out in workstations

    The union saw workstations as a channel of cooperation, which weakened

    labours resolve and diminished its ability to fight industrial relations

    battles

  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    11/12

    The new experiment of management of human resources (HRM) at the

    company came to an end.

    Examples:

    A section chief blocked the suggestion for a hydraulic lift because his vice-

    president thought it absurd for a labour surplus company to invest in a

    labour-saving device

    Departmental heads were supposed to be on shop councils, discussing with

    union nominees the issues of quality, safety, and productivity, but not a

    single council met in six months although workstations referred plenty of

    unresolved issues to them

    While managers took no initiative, the union did not even name itsrepresentatives to the councils

    Senior managers expected workstations and shop councils to enhance

    productivity and contribute to trust relations without themselves making

    any contribution to the process

    Issues in the NewExperiment (contd.)

  • 8/4/2019 German Pharma

    12/12

    Thank youThank you


Recommended