Date post: | 22-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jack-walsh |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Germany’s External Relations:Context and PolicyToward theEast
Carnegie Endowment
Klaus Segbers
Free University of Berlin
Washington, November 24, 2003
Content
1 National and Global Contexts of Germany’s FP
2 Germany‘s Political Agenda
3 Germany and Russia: An Axis Reactivated?
4 Lessons from Slipping into a War
1.1 National Context: Structures
„Zivilmacht“ (civilian power concept)
Corporatism (politics as bargaining and mediation of conflict regulation)
„Handelsstaat“ (trading state; dependency on importing energy)
Social and non-state actors and dimensions
Germany's Dependence on Energy Import
98%
82%
55%
Mineral Oil Natural Gas Coal
75% of energy consumption have to be imported
Source: Verbundnetz Gas AG
Growing Dependency on Natural Gas Imports
70
30
76
24
81
19
83
17
86
14
87
13
88
12
1980 1990 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
German Extraction
Imports
Share in %Projection
Source: Verbundnetz Gas AG
1.2 Global Context
Post-Westphalian system (globalization)Post-Cold War systemPost-bipolar systemMore actors, more levels, more games, more (and conflicting) rulesPost-WW 2 agenda is changingLess sovereigntyDecreasing consistency
1.3 National Context: History
Historical Contingencies
Unification of 1991
Normalization and pragmatization of Germany‘s foreign relations
Foreign Deployments of German Forces
ca. 300
ca. 1.820
ca. 430
ca. 40
12
ca. 1.320
ca. 3.350
11
7.300 Bundeswehr soldiers are involved in global conflict resolution
1.4 Foreign Policy Outcome
Pursuing own interests via
Politics of integration
Politics of institution building
Not necessarily siding with U.S. on all matters (since 1998)
Greater relevance of EU
1.5 FP’s Conditioning Variables
• Permanent media exposure
• Permanent elections
• Changing domestic and European coalitions
• Continuing multi-level games
2.1 Priority Issues: Domestic Problems
Domestic issues are by far more important than external questions.Germany is in a process of deep changes of employment, health, pension, education and tax policies.In general, there is not yet a break-through, despite “Agenda 2010”.
2.2 Topics and Issues: The External Agenda
Europe: Institutional reforms
Europe: Enlargement
Europe: Stability pact (still…)
Europe: rebuilding GASP/ CFSP
2.3 Topics and Interests: the Agenda
Maintaining and developing effective institutions and regimesFuture role of U.S.A.: balancing, interlocking, or inclusion?Demographic trends: regulating migration
2.4 Issues and Problems of Transatlantic Relations
How to achieve an equilibrium of global asymmetric configurations of actors? Is it possible to institutionalize the U.S. in a global world?How to modernize and stabilize the Near and Middle East?How – if at all – make political Islam and (post)modernity compatible?How to control WMD‘s?Can the CFSP be re-build, re-activated?What to do with the East-EU spaces in Europe?What are relevant macro-tendencies b/w anarchy; institutionalization; selective stability?
3.1 Germany and Russia: Problems?
No significant bilateral problems:
Emigration – controlledDebts – managedEconomies – cooperating (though unevenly)Restitution - symbolic
3.2 Germany and Russia: Tasks
EU – RF (economics, after „Kaliningrad“)
EU- RF (security, NATO-enlargement, after Iraq)
EU – RF (societies, Chechnya, Media, etc.)
3.3 Germany and Russia: Dependencies?
Neither way.Russia is good in balancing, vertically and horizontally (you also may call it inconsistency). D. is important, but not a gatekeeper to the EU.Germany is partly dependent on energy imports and on repayments. But not crucially.
Germany:The Main Mineral Oil Supply Countries
Origins of mineral oil imports to Germany in 2001
(in % of total 104.632.000t)
Russian Federation
29%
Norway19%Great Britain
15%
Libya9%
Syria7%
Others21%
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, 2002
Germany's Foreign Trade Partners: Imports
(shares in % of total 522.062 mill. €)
Netherlands8%
United States8%
Great Britain6%
Others51%
France10%
Italy6%Russian
Federation2%
Austria4%
Belgium5%
Russia ranks 15th (2002)
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, 2003
Germany's Foreign Trade Partners: Exports
(shares in % of total 648.306 mill. €)
France11%
Netherlands10%
United States8%
Others46%
Italy6%
Austria5%
Russian Federation
2%Belgium
5%
Great Britain7%
Russia ranks 15th (2002)
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, 2003
3.4 Germany and Russia – Allies?
No.In global times there are no Metternich-type alliances.Germany is deeply embedded in European institutions; Russia is not (yet?).The fabric of good relations is, to a large extent, social, i.e. „beneath“ politics.D: Economic exchange, cultural images, language competences are overwhelmingly directed elsewhere.
4.1 Where are we now?
Substantial differences between European and U.S. politics – reflected in Europe and in the U.S. - toward...... Iraq: What is the mission? WMDs? Fighting Al Quaeda? Regime change? Transforming the regional landscape? Oil? Relight the last war?... reconstruction: no mission, no concept. What is the roadmap for re-building Iraq? What commitments are there? ... future options for the Near and Middle East – politically and socially ... trade-offs b/w effective counter-terrorism and civil liberties and rights... the future role of the U.S.A. (preemption).
4.2 Is it only politics?
Fortunately, the economic and social relations b/w Europe and the U.S. are not affected so far.But we see effects of new security requirements, visa rules etc.Also, in our societies there are partly diverging views and even significant differences in outlooks on how to address global problems.
Germans on U.S. Leadership in World Affairs
55
5027
4568
neither or bothequally
not desirable
desirable
How desirable is it that U.S. exert strong leadership in World Affairs?
2002
2003
(Source:Transatlantic Trends 2003)
4.3 Lessons ... from Slipping into another War
Either give the U.S. a wild card, assuming benign hegemon behavior, or build and maintain effective institutions.To become effective, institutions – including U.N. - must be modified.Rethink election cycles.Reflect media influence on modi operandi.
Germans and Americans on the Role of U.N. in World Affairs
2
4
18
26
80
70
Don´tknow
No
Yes
United Nations needs to be strengthened or not?
U.S.
Germany
3
5
59
38
38
57
Don´t know
No
Yes
When vital interests of our country are involved, it is justified to bypass the UN.
(Source:Transatlantic Trends 2003)
3.1 Germany‘s foreign policy since 2002:Phase 1 (Summer 2002)
• Tactical mission: winning elections.
• Excessive statements ...• ...led to self-constraints of
the governing coalition: parties and society as constraints.
• „Zivilmacht“ by default, not design...
3.2 Germany‘s foreign behavior since 2002:Constraints, phase 2 (Winter 2002/03)
• Attempts to avoid isolation; cooperation with France and Russia, China
• Non-communication with U.S.A.
• Mutual dependency b/w; pressure and need for domestic reforms and foreign behavior
3.3 Germany’s externals behavior since 2002: Activism, phase 3 (Spring 2003)
• Later, attempts to build a win-position >>>
• … succeeded: no legitimation for a unfounded campaign;
• ... failed: U.S.A. would act no matter what: costs of non-action too high; corresponds to national security strategy/ ideology; geo-political (“democratization”) and geo-economic motivations (oil, Saudi Arabia); group thinking.
3.4 Germany’s Policy Since the War:Maneuvering and Balancing,
Indifference
• Differences toward U.S. government remain substantial (on what drives politics, institutions, and many policy issues)
• Formally repairing relations with U.S. – back to courtesy
• Reducing symbolism re. the tripartite axis - while continuing attempts to strengthen the EU – CSFP
• Focus on domestic affairs is dominant
• Stressing Germany’s active role in international crises (now including Iraq)
Foreign direct investments in Russian industry
FDI in Russian industry from major investor countries in jan-sept 2002 $mln
Cyprus13%
Switzerland10%
Germany10%
Britain10%
Netherlands10%
France8%
Finland7%
United States6%
Others26%
direct portfolio otherIndustry 4950 100 1202 92 3656
Cyprus 647 13,1 139 8 500Switzerland 516 10,4 18 0.2 498Germany 502 10,1 140 0.4 362Britain 494 10,0 184 3 307Netherlands 481 9,7 151 - 330France 396 8,0 4 - 392Finland 346 7,0 103 - 243U.S. 286 5,8 160 1 125Others 1282 25,9
Total
As % of industry results
of which
Source: State Statistics Committee