Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInterim Pre Appeal VersionPurpose of reportsThese reports provide staff development materials to support self-evaluation and improvement processes in schools.They should be used in conjunction with our supporting documents:-
‘SQA Analysis and Links to Learning and Teaching’ and ‘Interpretation Guidance 2012’.
There are also materials on the ScotXed website to help users interpret the statistics.
Reports Important NoteThese are interim reports, and will be replaced once we have all the corrected data from Scotxed.Please note the following:-
There are no 2012 data for ungraded courses such as Access 3 and Skills for Work. The NCDs, RV and PV for Higher Mathematics will be minimally affected by the small number of
Gaelic language candidates who may have been included by ScotXed in this first release of STACS. The final STACS values may therefore differ slightly.
We are unable to generate the S6 Cumulative report.
What’s NewNo changes have been made to the style and content of the S5 and S5/S6 reports. More detailed information about this report is provided in the document Interpretation Guidance 2012.
Copyright noticeThe copyright owners grant the right to the Schools and Education Authorities, which are the subject of the report, to copy and to use this document for internal purposes only.The Freedom of Information Scotland Act 2002 does not convey a right to re-use this information in a way that would infringe this copyright, for example by issuing copies to the public or for inclusion in commercial publications. It does not however exempt authorities from disclosing this information if a FOI request is made, unless data in the reports relate to small numbers of pupils and so may allow the identification of individuals. Recipients of the information, however, will not be able to reproduce that information without seeking permission from the copyright holders.Since much of the data are derived from STACS, the use of these reports is also subject to the ScotXed protocol. It is the responsibility of the users of these reports to ensure that they are familiar with the protocol and abide by its provisions.
Data SourcesThe major source of data for the reports is the STACs online system published by SGED. We also rely on a further set of data that are only provided by ScotXed as additional data files. A limited number of statistics are derived from candidate level data that have been provided by SQA to schools and authorities for the generation of the August reports and are combined with the candidates stage and gender data provided by schools via the LA. For example, the scatterplots that are included in course reports are created from such data and are not identical in appearance to those published on the STACs system.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 1
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH EnglishEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been below the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 10 10 6 4 1 1 2 3 1 1 3 4Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1 1 3 38.0 37.9 35.7 1 3 4Male 2 9 37.3 29.0 1 1
Female 1 1 2 38.0 38.2 38.0 1 2 3
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -0.66 -0.16 0.44 5.00 4.00 4.00Male 2.82 -0.64 1.00 6.00
Female -0.58 -1.66 0.79 5.00 5.50 3.33
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 3.23 -0.16 -0.62 0.57 1.00 5.00 4.00 4.00Male 3.20 2.27 1.00 1.00
Female -0.16 -3.56 1.36 5.00 7.00 3.33
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher English Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Advanced Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher English Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 100 0 2 3 100 0 33 25 1 0 1 1Grades A-B 100 0 3 3 100 0 67 75 1 0 2 3Grades A-C 100 100 8 100 100 100 67 100 1 1 2 4
Grade D 0 0 1 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 1 0No Award 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher EnglishNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 3
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH EnglishEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In previous years incomplete awards have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 4 8 4 4 4 36 30 38 38 36 47 45 50 48 52Incomplete 5 0 5 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the third highest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 1 1 10 6 5 32.6 32.7 28.2 30.2 30.6 46 45 49 48 52Male 2 1 9 8 8 32.6 33.7 28.2 29.4 29.2 21 13 13 14 21
Female 2 2 10 6 3 32.6 32.3 28.2 30.5 31.6 25 32 36 34 31
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.27 0.16 0.38 0.72 *** 0.41 4.46 4.44 5.37 4.35 4.60Male 0.59 0.62 0.22 0.57 -0.02 4.29 3.85 5.54 4.79 5.48
Female 0.01 -0.05 0.43 0.72 *** 0.68 ** 3+ 4.60 4.69 5.31 4.18 4.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.20 0.19 -0.29 0.45 ** 0.23 4.47 4.43 5.35 4.26 4.51Male 0.15 0.93 -0.17 0.31 -0.22 4.30 3.85 5.54 4.77 5.26
Female 0.29 -0.15 -0.37 0.44 * 0.50 4.60 4.68 5.29 4.06 4.03
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher English Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher English Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is above the national pattern for this course in the current year. In most previous years awards at Grades A-C have been above the national pattern for this course.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 2 2 7 3 3 21 24 12 21 21 10 11 6 10 11Grades A-B 2 2 7 4 2 51 51 36 46 56 24 23 18 22 29Grades A-C 2 1 5 2 4 79 84 70 88 77 37 38 35 42 40
Grade D 5 9 6 10 7 13 7 10 2 10 6 3 5 1 5No Award 9 9 5 7 6 6 9 18 10 13 3 4 9 5 7
Course Comparisons Higher EnglishCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 4. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is greater than the school in the middle of the rank order by 0.37.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Madras (Fif) 30.6 3.68 10 1.27 *** 139 32 6 120 86 2 0 0 0Rudolf Steiner,Edin (Ind) 30.6 4.00 10 0.86 13 0 0 11 85 2 0 0 0Gordon Schools,The (Abs) 30.6 4.52 8 0.45 * 57 29 7 38 67 7 10 18 1Lochgilphead High (A&B) 30.6 4.60 8 0.41 52 36 4 40 77 4 0 0 0Broughton High (Edi) 30.6 4.80 7 0.17 76 31 6 50 66 7 4 5 1Webster's High (Ang) 30.6 4.97 6 0.03 66 34 6 49 74 5 0 0 0Ardrossan Academy (NA) 30.6 5.11 5 -0.15 61 30 7 44 72 5 0 0 0Turnbull High (ED) 30.6 5.13 5 -0.15 94 52 1 63 67 7 0 0 0Belmont Academy (SA) 30.6 5.29 4 -0.31 ** 164 46 1 117 71 6 0 0 0St Aidan's High School (NL) 30.6 5.44 3 -0.42 *** 127 41 2 73 57 9 18 14 1The Nicolson Institute (EiS) 30.6 5.78 2 -0.79 *** 110 37 4 65 59 9 2 2 3The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 5
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 EnglishEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is below the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 5 6 7 8 7 24 22 22 18 22 31 34 29 23 31Incomplete 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the second highest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 7 6 7 4 4 23.6 23.9 23.4 24.4 24.3 30 34 27 23 31Male 7 5 9 4 3 24.0 24.4 21.8 24.9 25.5 10 13 9 13 19
Female 7 6 4 5 8 23.4 23.6 24.2 23.9 22.5 20 21 18 10 12
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -1.06 *** 0.25 0.48 -0.46 -0.43 6.43 4.94 4.93 5.22 5.32Male -0.62 * 0.42 0.40 -1.07 *** -0.47 6.10 4.77 5.44 5.92 5.26
Female -1.34 *** 0.11 0.44 0.39 -0.28 6.60 5.05 4.67 4.30 5.42
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -1.23 *** 0.52 0.68 * -0.54 * -0.48 6.57 4.90 4.82 5.42 5.50Male -0.88 ** 0.74 0.24 -0.97 ** -0.25 6.50 4.55 5.44 6.09 5.33
Female -1.45 *** 0.37 0.97 ** 0.07 -0.73 6.60 5.11 4.38 4.50 5.73
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 English Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 English Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 4 2 6 5 0 12 14 9 10 0 4 4 2 3Grades A-B 10 4 4 7 7 10 38 38 35 32 3 13 11 8 10Grades A-C 9 3 3 5 8 48 82 79 83 68 15 28 23 19 21
Grade D 1 9 9 5 1 26 6 3 9 19 8 2 1 2 6No Award 1 5 6 5 3 26 12 10 9 13 8 4 3 2 4
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 EnglishCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 10. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is less than the school in the middle of the rank order by -0.62.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Hamilton Grammar School (SL) 24.2 4.24 9 0.66 *** 100 32 2 84 84 3 0 0 0Currie High (Edi) 24.2 4.27 9 0.62 ** 49 20 8 42 86 3 0 0 0Balwearie High (Fif) 24.4 4.32 9 0.53 *** 87 20 8 78 90 2 0 0 0St Margaret's HS (NL) 24.4 4.36 9 0.51 * 53 19 8 46 87 2 0 0 0Westhill Academy (Abs) 24.4 4.66 7 0.22 40 17 9 35 88 2 0 0 0Liberton High (Edi) 24.3 4.70 7 0.16 67 40 1 50 75 6 6 9 2James Gillespie's High (Edi) 24.3 4.72 7 0.16 51 15 10 38 75 6 0 0 0Largs Academy (NA) 24.4 4.83 6 0.04 64 22 7 52 81 4 0 0 0Carnoustie High (Ang) 24.3 4.91 6 -0.02 57 27 4 38 67 8 10 18 1Lochgilphead High (A&B) 24.3 5.32 4 -0.43 31 22 7 21 68 8 0 0 0Balfron High (Sti) 24.3 5.33 4 -0.45 39 13 10 27 69 8 3 8 2The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 7
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt1 EnglishEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is below the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been below the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 6 10 10 8 7 1 2 4 10 1 2 6Incomplete 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 1 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2011. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 5 6 4 18.6 18.2 18.8 10 2 6Male 5 7 3 18.8 18.2 19.6 7 2 2
Female 5 4 17.9 18.4 3 4
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.42 -2.17 -0.43 4.60 7.00 5.17Male 0.36 -2.01 -0.90 4.71 7.00 5.50
Female 0.67 -0.26 4.33 5.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.57 -2.34 -0.15 5.00 7.00 5.60Male 0.60 -2.16 -0.04 5.00 7.00 5.50
Female 0.67 -0.27 5.00 5.67
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 1 English Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 1 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 1 English Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is above the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Grades A-B 3 0 0 9 50 0 0 17 5 0 0 1Grades A-C 5 0 9 4 70 0 50 83 7 0 1 5
Grade D 1 0 0 2 30 0 0 17 3 0 0 1No Award 0 0 1 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 1 0
Course Comparisons Intermediate 1 EnglishNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 9
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH FrenchEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is below the national pattern in the current year. There were no incomplete awards in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 5 8 8 1 1 1 2 1 1Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 5 10 2 35.8 27.3 38.5 2 1 1Male
Female 5 10 3 35.8 27.3 38.5 2 1 1
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1.19 3.80 -1.64 3.50 3.00 5.00Male
Female 1.24 4.13 -1.64 3.50 3.00 5.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 2.40 2.57 -1.83 1.00 3.00 5.00Male
Female 2.36 2.97 -1.86 1.00 3.00 5.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher French Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Advanced Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher French Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 2 0 0 50 0 0 1 0 0Grades A-B 5 100 0 50 100 0 1 1 0Grades A-C 100 100 100 100 100 100 2 1 1
Grade D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0No Award 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher FrenchNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 11
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH FrenchEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is in line with the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 2 7 2 4 5 9 4 9 6 6 12 6 12 7 8Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is well above the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the second highest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 6 2 8 8 2 31.8 35.0 30.5 30.6 34.5 12 6 12 7 8Male 7 2 5 10 31.0 36.8 33.9 25.5 5 1 2 1
Female 5 2 9 7 2 32.4 34.6 29.9 31.4 34.5 7 5 10 6 8
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.24 -0.22 0.72 -1.05 -0.80 4.25 3.50 3.50 5.57 4.38Male -1.06 * -1.26 -1.49 -3.15 5.40 4.00 5.00 9.00
Female 0.34 -0.03 1.18 ** -0.71 -0.84 3.43 3.40 3.20 5.00 4.38
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.92 0.51 0.55 -1.94 ** -1.27 4.25 3.80 3.50 5.57 4.71Male -2.11 * 0.69 -3.93 -5.00 5.40 4.00 9.00 9.00
Female -0.07 0.49 1.03 ** -1.43 * -1.32 3.43 3.75 2.89 5.00 4.71
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher French Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher French Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is well below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 6 6 5 9 5 33 33 42 14 38 4 2 5 1 3Grades A-B 8 2 3 9 5 50 83 83 29 62 6 5 10 2 5Grades A-C 6 100 5 10 9 83 100 92 57 62 10 6 11 4 5
Grade D 3 0 0 3 1 8 0 0 14 25 1 0 0 1 2No Award 4 0 3 1 4 8 0 8 29 12 1 0 1 2 1
Course Comparisons Higher FrenchNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 13
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 FrenchEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is below the national pattern in the current year. There were no incomplete awards in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 7 5 8 1 2 1 2 2 1Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 7 1 1 22.8 29.2 36.8 2 2 1Male
Female 10 1 1 17.8 33.9 36.8 1 1 1
Progression Value
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -0.10 0.66 -0.28 4.00 2.00 2.00Male
Female 3.06 -0.10 -0.28 2.00 2.00 2.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates No RV data for this course in 2012
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.31 1.66 4.00 2.00Male
Female 1.16 2.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 French Progression Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 4 100 100 50 100 100 1 2 1Grades A-B 7 100 100 50 100 100 1 2 1Grades A-C 100 100 100 100 100 100 2 2 1
Grade D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0No Award 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 FrenchNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 15
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH SpanishEntries and Incomplete AwardsThere are insufficient data for meaningful analysis.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 2 2 1 3 3 1Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0There are no PV data for this course.
No Scatterplots for this course in 2012Attainment - Awards
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 33 0 0 1 0 0Grades A-B 67 67 0 2 2 0Grades A-C 100 67 100 3 2 1
Grade D 0 0 0 0 0 0No Award 0 33 0 0 1 0
There are no PV data for 2012 and so no comparisons can be made.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 16
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH SpanishEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 3 6 3 4 3 5 3 5 4 4 7 4 6 5 6Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2009. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 7 9 9 8 4 31.8 29.6 27.9 30.4 32.8 7 4 6 5 6Male 8 10 28.9 25.0 2 1
Female 6 7 9 4 4 31.8 30.3 28.5 33.3 32.8 5 2 5 4 6
Progression ValueAt the 90% confidence level, on average, All Candidates attained a significantly poorer band in the current year than is predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4. On average, pupils achieved one band or more poorer than predicted.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.12 -2.67 ** -0.14 0.49 -1.34 * 4.14 6.75 4.83 3.60 5.17Male -2.16 1.83 6.00 4.00
Female 0.57 -3.54 ** -0.40 1.32 -1.36 * 3.40 7.50 5.00 2.25 5.17
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.99 -3.32 *** -0.44 -0.34 -0.95 4.00 6.75 4.83 4.00 5.20Male -2.68 * -0.22 6.00 4.00
Female 0.09 -4.23 ** -0.49 0.54 -0.97 3.00 7.50 5.00 2.33 5.20
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Spanish Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Spanish Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is well below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In most previous years awards at Grades A-C have been below the national pattern for this course.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 7 0 9 4 0 29 0 17 60 0 2 0 1 3 0Grades A-B 9 10 8 4 8 43 25 50 80 50 3 1 3 4 3Grades A-C 100 10 7 7 9 100 50 83 80 67 7 2 5 4 4
Grade D 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 1No Award 0 1 2 2 2 0 50 17 20 17 0 2 1 1 1
Course Comparisons Higher SpanishNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 18
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 SpanishEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. There were no incomplete awards in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 6 4 2 5 2 2 2 2 7 3 2 3Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 8 8 9 9 9 23.6 23.5 22.0 21.3 20.8 2 7 3 2 3Male
Female 7 8 8 10 25.0 23.2 23.5 20.8 1 5 2 3
Progression Value
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.01 -0.57 0.78 * -1.73 -1.06 4.00 4.43 3.67 6.50 6.00Male
Female -0.48 -0.55 0.46 -1.13 4.00 4.40 3.50 6.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -1.76 -2.90 * 6.50 7.00Male
Female
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Spanish Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Spanish Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes in the current year, is below the national pattern, however the pupil numbers involved are small.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0Grades A-B 0 9 100 57 100 0 33 2 4 3 0 1Grades A-C 9 8 100 86 100 50 67 2 6 3 1 2
Grade D 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0No Award 1 1 0 0 0 50 33 0 0 0 1 1
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 SpanishNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 20
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt1 SpanishEntries and Incomplete AwardsIt is not possible to evaluate the level of entries. There were no incomplete awards in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 2 5 1 2 7 2Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 5 7 10 22.8 20.6 15.8 2 7 2Male
Female 10 12.7 1
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -1.51 -1.37 0.78 4.00 5.43 3.50Male
Female -1.67 8.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates No RV data for this course in 2012
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 1 Spanish Progression Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 0 50 0 0 1Grades A-B 50 57 50 1 4 1Grades A-C 100 57 100 2 4 2
Grade D 0 14 0 0 1 0No Award 0 29 0 0 2 0
Course Comparisons Intermediate 1 SpanishNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 22
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH MathematicsEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been below the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 7 7 5 10 3 3 3 4 2 5 4 5 5 2 7Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2011, 2008. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 8 1 2 1 4 34.5 37.8 37.4 37.8 36.2 4 5 5 2 6Male 6 2 3 34.6 36.8 36.2 2 3 6
Female 8 1 3 3 34.5 39.4 37.4 37.8 2 2 5 2
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -1.17 0.00 0.64 2.38 -0.53 6.50 4.40 4.00 2.00 5.67Male -1.52 -0.89 ** -0.55 7.00 5.67 5.67
Female -0.80 1.38 0.59 2.27 6.00 2.50 4.00 2.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -1.96 -1.01 0.93 1.19 -0.81 6.50 4.50 3.75 2.00 5.67Male -1.41 -1.48 -0.65 7.00 5.67 5.67
Female -2.52 1.24 0.53 1.00 6.00 1.00 3.75 2.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Mathematics Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Advanced Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Mathematics Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is above the national pattern for this course in the current year. In most previous years every pupil gained an award at Grades A-C.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 5 5 1 5 0 20 20 50 14 0 1 1 1 1Grades A-B 8 5 3 100 5 25 40 60 100 43 1 2 3 2 3Grades A-C 8 100 100 100 4 50 100 100 100 71 2 5 5 2 5
Grade D 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1No Award 1 0 0 0 7 50 0 0 0 14 2 0 0 0 1
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher MathematicsNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 24
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH MathematicsEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is in line with the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been below the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 7 9 9 3 6 22 15 18 29 22 28 23 24 36 31Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the lowest of the 5 years on record. In most previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has been above the national pattern for this course.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 1 2 2 5 5 34.8 34.0 33.3 32.4 32.2 28 23 24 36 31Male 1 3 2 4 4 33.6 32.3 32.8 31.8 31.9 14 8 8 16 16
Female 1 2 3 5 6 35.9 34.9 33.6 32.8 32.6 14 15 16 20 15
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 1.15 *** 0.15 0.09 0.24 0.23 2.86 4.30 4.46 4.53 4.65Male 1.72 *** 0.26 -1.19 0.30 0.26 2.43 4.50 5.75 4.44 4.63
Female 0.56 0.20 0.81 ** 0.25 0.19 3.29 4.20 3.81 4.60 4.67
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.93 *** 0.12 -0.11 -0.03 -0.20 2.86 4.30 4.46 4.49 4.63Male 1.41 *** -0.01 -0.58 0.27 0.07 2.43 4.50 5.75 4.33 4.60
Female 0.44 0.29 0.19 -0.23 -0.45 3.29 4.20 3.81 4.60 4.67
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Mathematics Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Mathematics Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is in line with the national pattern for this course in the current year. In all previous years awards at Grades A-C have been well above the national pattern for this course.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 1 3 3 4 4 46 26 25 25 26 13 6 6 9 8Grades A-B 1 2 4 4 5 89 57 50 53 48 25 13 12 19 15Grades A-C 100 1 2 3 5 100 87 83 81 71 28 20 20 29 22
Grade D 0 9 9 9 3 0 4 4 3 13 0 1 1 1 4No Award 0 9 8 6 6 0 9 12 17 16 0 2 3 6 5
Course Comparisons Higher MathematicsCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 7. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is less than the school in the middle of the rank order by -0.14.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Grangemouth High (Fal) 32.2 3.33 10 1.46 *** 45 24 5 41 91 1 0 0 0Eyemouth High (ScB) 32.2 3.62 10 1.19 *** 21 22 6 19 90 1 0 0 0Boclair Academy (ED) 32.2 3.98 9 0.88 *** 108 39 1 84 78 4 1 1 4Breadalbane Academy (P&K) 32.2 4.32 8 0.50 * 37 23 5 32 86 2 0 0 0Forrester High (Edi) 32.2 4.44 8 0.41 16 11 10 15 94 1 0 0 0Rosshall Academy (Gla) 32.2 4.51 7 0.35 57 20 7 45 79 3 0 0 0Lochgilphead High (A&B) 32.2 4.65 7 0.23 31 22 6 22 71 5 0 0 0Madras (Fif) 32.2 4.70 6 0.14 120 28 3 84 70 6 0 0 0Webster's High (Ang) 32.2 5.11 4 -0.25 63 32 1 39 62 8 6 10 1Paisley Grammar School (Ren) 32.2 5.17 4 -0.33 81 28 3 49 60 8 3 4 2St Aidan's High School (NL) 32.2 5.54 3 -0.65 ** 69 22 6 39 57 9 1 1 4The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 26
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 MathematicsEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is below the national pattern in the current year. In all previous years entries have been well below the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 10 10 8 10 8 10 12 16 9 16 13 18 21 11 23Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is well above the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the highest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 3 5 4 8 2 25.4 24.8 25.0 23.3 25.8 13 18 21 11 23Male 5 7 5 9 1 23.9 23.2 24.0 21.9 26.4 6 7 9 6 15
Female 2 3 4 6 6 26.6 25.8 25.7 24.9 24.6 7 11 12 5 8
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1.15 ** -0.32 0.66 -0.33 0.62 3.15 5.00 4.14 5.45 4.39Male 0.57 -0.65 0.81 -0.44 1.16 * 4.00 5.71 4.11 5.83 3.53
Female 1.62 *** -0.07 0.57 -0.21 -0.53 2.43 4.55 4.17 5.00 6.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1.30 *** -0.36 0.92 0.17 0.95 3.33 5.53 4.06 5.00 4.65Male 0.64 -1.12 1.38 -0.64 1.69 ** 4.00 6.17 3.63 6.00 3.82
Female 1.95 *** 0.18 0.50 1.39 -0.45 2.67 5.11 4.44 3.33 6.17
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Mathematics Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Mathematics Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is above the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 2 3 2 10 1 46 39 38 9 39 6 7 8 1 9Grades A-B 1 5 1 8 2 77 50 71 36 57 10 9 15 4 13Grades A-C 100 7 3 5 3 100 61 76 73 74 13 11 16 8 17
Grade D 0 6 0 4 5 0 6 0 9 9 0 1 0 1 2No Award 0 2 5 6 7 0 33 24 18 17 0 6 5 2 4
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 MathematicsCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 4. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is greater than the school in the middle of the rank order by 0.52.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Annan Academy (D&G) 25.8 3.19 10 1.87 *** 52 23 4 48 92 1 0 0 0Fortrose Academy (Hig) 25.8 4.16 9 0.84 ** 31 13 9 26 84 1 0 0 0Stirling High (Sti) 25.7 4.19 9 0.86 *** 39 14 9 30 77 2 1 3 5Lochgilphead High (A&B) 25.8 4.39 9 0.62 23 16 8 17 74 3 0 0 0St Thomas Aquinas SS (Gla) 25.7 4.89 7 0.15 50 23 4 36 72 3 1 2 5Mackie Academy (Abs) 25.8 4.91 7 0.14 56 18 6 37 66 4 1 2 6Penicuik High (Mid) 25.8 5.13 7 -0.12 38 23 4 24 63 5 0 0 0Preston Lodge High (EL) 25.9 5.98 3 -0.98 *** 69 30 1 37 54 7 1 1 6Bucksburn Academy (AbC) 25.7 6.07 3 -1.02 14 14 9 7 50 8 0 0 0Our Lady's HS, Moth (NL) 25.8 6.74 1 -1.74 *** 33 21 4 13 39 9 2 6 3St David's High (Mid) 25.8 6.83 1 -1.80 *** 51 22 4 19 37 10 1 2 5The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 28
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt1 MathematicsEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is in line with the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been in line with the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 10 6 5 6 6 2 7 8 7 7 2 10 10 9 10Incomplete 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2008. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1 8 1 3 3 21.6 17.4 20.6 20.0 19.6 2 10 8 9 10Male 8 1 2 1 17.1 22.3 19.9 20.9 7 2 7 5
Female 1 7 3 3 7 21.6 18.0 20.1 20.7 18.4 2 3 6 2 5
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1.33 -1.02 -1.05 0.56 -0.99 ** 3.00 7.00 6.50 4.22 6.60Male -1.03 0.29 0.42 -1.15 6.86 4.50 4.29 6.20
Female 1.46 -1.30 -1.35 0.68 -0.85 3.00 7.33 7.17 4.00 7.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 3.99 -0.83 -2.26 1.44 -0.90 2.00 7.13 9.00 4.40 7.40Male -0.90 1.34 -0.67 7.00 4.40 7.00
Female 4.27 -0.90 -1.92 -1.28 2.00 7.33 9.00 8.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 1 Mathematics Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 1 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 1 Mathematics Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 1 0 5 5 0 50 0 10 22 0 1 0 1 2 0Grades A-B 100 9 8 3 9 100 10 10 56 10 2 1 1 5 1Grades A-C 100 7 8 1 7 100 40 30 89 40 2 4 3 8 4
Grade D 0 4 2 0 1 0 10 20 0 20 0 1 2 0 2No Award 0 2 6 8 4 0 50 30 11 40 0 5 3 1 4
Course Comparisons Intermediate 1 MathematicsCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 7. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is less than the school in the middle of the rank order by -0.21.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Ardrossan Academy (NA) 19.8 3.27 10 2.27 ** 12 6 7 9 75 2 1 8 3Rosshall Academy (Gla) 19.6 3.71 10 1.90 *** 38 13 2 33 87 1 0 0 0North Berwick High (EL) 19.8 4.85 8 0.71 14 5 7 9 64 3 1 7 3Dunfermline High (Fif) 19.6 5.29 7 0.32 31 8 5 18 58 4 0 0 0St Andrew's HS (NL) 19.6 6.03 5 -0.42 40 11 3 21 52 5 3 8 3The Nicolson Institute (EiS) 19.6 6.39 4 -0.73 20 7 6 8 40 7 1 5 4Lochgilphead High (A&B) 19.6 6.60 3 -0.99 ** 10 7 6 4 40 7 0 0 0Oldmachar Academy (AbC) 19.7 6.62 3 -1.04 ** 13 5 7 7 54 5 0 0 0St Ninian's High School (ER) 19.8 6.73 3 -1.09 ** 23 4 8 9 39 7 1 4 4Preston Lodge High (EL) 19.7 6.96 3 -1.38 *** 25 11 3 9 36 8 1 4 4St Ambrose High School (NL) 19.6 7.64 2 -2.04 *** 11 4 9 2 18 10 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 30
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH BiologyEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In all previous years entries have been well above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 3 2 1 3 1 4 5 7 4 10 5 7 9 5 14Incomplete 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is well below the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the third highest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 1 9 5 10 9 37.8 33.4 35.5 30.4 33.8 5 7 8 5 14Male 4 10 7 10 10 35.5 28.5 33.7 29.7 30.3 2 1 2 3 5
Female 1 8 5 10 7 39.4 34.2 36.2 31.5 35.8 3 6 6 2 9
Progression ValueAt the 99% confidence level, on average, All Candidates attained a significantly poorer band in the current year than is predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4. On average, pupils achieved one band or more poorer than predicted.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -1.96 -0.73 -0.35 0.00 -1.52 *** 6.00 6.29 5.25 6.40 6.93Male -1.56 -1.02 -2.67 0.39 -2.20 *** 6.50 8.00 8.00 6.00 8.60
Female -2.28 -0.71 0.46 -0.54 -1.13 5.67 6.00 4.33 7.00 6.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.53 -1.01 -0.47 -0.95 -1.88 ** 5.50 6.00 4.60 6.75 6.45Male -0.66 -2.08 -0.11 -3.24 * 6.50 8.00 6.50 8.33
Female -0.35 -1.01 -0.03 -1.79 -1.36 4.50 6.00 3.75 7.00 5.75
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Biology Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Advanced Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Biology Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is well below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In all previous years awards at Grades A-C have been below the national pattern for this course.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 4 0 4 0 7 20 0 22 0 7 1 0 2 0 1Grades A-B 6 8 6 0 9 40 14 33 0 14 2 1 3 0 2Grades A-C 9 7 7 7 10 40 57 56 60 36 2 4 5 3 5
Grade D 3 2 0 2 5 20 29 0 20 7 1 2 0 1 1No Award 1 5 2 4 1 40 14 33 20 57 2 1 3 1 8
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher BiologyCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 11. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is less than the school in the middle of the rank order by -1.73.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Elgin Academy (Mor) 33.5 4.00 7 1.59 *** 15 6 2 12 80 4 0 0 0Thurso High (Hig) 34.2 4.27 7 1.08 ** 11 5 2 11 100 100 0 0 0Clydebank High (WD) 33.0 4.31 7 1.47 *** 13 4 3 11 85 4 0 0 0Bell Baxter High (Fif) 33.7 4.88 5 0.62 18 4 3 14 78 5 1 6 1Larbert High (Fal) 33.1 5.00 4 0.68 13 3 6 10 77 5 0 0 0Calderglen High School (SL) 34.4 5.20 4 0.16 10 2 7 8 80 4 0 0 0Oldmachar Academy (AbC) 34.6 5.65 3 -0.38 18 7 1 12 67 7 0 0 0Marr College (SA) 34.1 6.08 2 -0.69 13 5 2 5 38 10 0 0 0Auchmuty High (Fif) 34.3 6.36 2 -1.02 * 11 4 3 6 55 8 0 0 0Broxburn Academy (WL) 33.1 6.50 2 -0.79 10 4 3 4 40 9 0 0 0Lochgilphead High (A&B) 33.8 6.93 1 -1.52 *** 14 10 1 5 36 10 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 32
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH BiologyEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been in line with the national pattern for this course.The level of incomplete awards is above the national pattern, however the pupil numbers involved are small. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 5 5 5 3 2 13 15 14 17 22 17 23 19 21 31Incomplete 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the third highest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 5 3 8 4 5 31.5 32.7 30.1 32.2 32.0 17 23 19 21 30Male 5 3 6 5 7 30.8 32.6 30.2 31.5 29.8 6 4 5 8 12
Female 4 4 8 4 2 31.8 32.7 30.1 32.6 33.4 11 19 14 13 18
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4. The current performance has significantly declined from that of last year.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.67 0.20 0.71 * 1.35 *** 0.02 5.65 4.48 4.95 3.48 4.87Male 0.66 -0.36 1.27 ** 1.28 ** -0.19 4.33 5.00 4.20 3.75 5.67
Female -1.40 * 0.36 0.56 1.36 *** 0.14 6.36 4.37 5.21 3.31 4.33
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.55 0.03 0.09 0.71 ** 0.00 5.33 4.48 4.88 3.48 4.87Male 0.47 -0.41 0.12 0.55 -0.19 3.80 5.00 4.75 3.75 5.67
Female -1.07 ** 0.13 0.10 0.79 ** 0.13 6.10 4.37 4.92 3.31 4.33
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Biology Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Biology Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is in line with the national pattern for this course in the current year. In most previous years awards at Grades A-C have been above the national pattern for this course.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 5 3 3 1 5 18 26 21 38 19 3 6 4 8 6Grades A-B 8 3 7 1 6 29 52 32 76 39 5 12 6 16 12Grades A-C 8 4 4 1 5 59 74 74 90 71 10 17 14 19 22
Grade D 5 3 2 9 3 12 17 21 5 16 2 4 4 1 5No Award 3 8 9 9 8 29 9 5 5 10 5 2 1 1 3
Course Comparisons Higher BiologyCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 6.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Bannockburn High (Sti) 31.9 3.42 10 1.47 *** 12 7 9 12 100 100 0 0 0Earlston High (ScB) 31.9 3.95 9 0.96 *** 40 17 3 34 85 2 0 0 0Our Lady's HS Cumbern'ld (NL) 32.0 4.30 8 0.56 * 30 13 6 24 80 3 0 0 0Peebles High (ScB) 32.0 4.41 8 0.42 * 65 19 2 49 75 4 5 8 1West Calder High (WL) 32.0 4.79 6 -0.01 48 19 2 34 71 5 0 0 0Lochgilphead High (A&B) 32.0 4.87 6 0.02 31 22 2 22 71 5 1 3 2Currie High (Edi) 32.0 5.00 5 -0.18 41 16 3 29 71 5 0 0 0St Augustine's High (Edi) 31.9 5.04 5 -0.15 31 15 5 22 71 5 1 3 2Aberdeen Grammar (AbC) 32.0 5.09 5 -0.29 36 12 6 23 64 7 1 3 2Carrick Academy (SA) 32.0 5.28 4 -0.42 18 14 5 11 61 7 0 0 0Dunfermline High (Fif) 32.0 5.95 2 -1.22 ** 21 6 9 13 62 7 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 34
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 BiologyEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well below the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 2 5 3 7 10 12 8 10 6 1 16 12 13 7 2Incomplete 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 3 2 5 8 8 24.4 25.9 24.3 22.8 22.8 16 12 13 6 2Male 5 1 4 10 7 23.4 28.5 24.6 17.0 22.8 7 1 8 1 2
Female 3 3 6 6 25.1 25.7 23.8 23.9 9 11 5 5
Progression Value
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.13 -1.17 ** -0.89 -0.31 -0.78 5.31 6.17 6.15 6.00 6.50Male 0.55 -2.59 -1.48 ** -2.02 -0.95 5.14 7.00 6.63 9.00 6.50
Female -0.23 -1.02 * -0.01 0.06 5.44 6.09 5.40 5.40
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.37 -0.58 -0.76 -0.85 -0.64 5.50 6.18 6.15 6.50 6.50Male 0.35 -1.27 -1.22 -2.33 -0.78 5.60 7.00 6.63 9.00 6.50
Female 0.38 -0.47 -0.04 -0.30 5.44 6.10 5.40 5.67
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 35
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Biology Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Biology Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes in the current year, is below the national pattern, however the pupil numbers involved are small. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 5 0 6 0 0 6 0 8 0 0 1 0 1 0 0Grades A-B 5 8 8 7 0 31 17 23 29 0 5 2 3 2 0Grades A-C 4 6 6 9 8 69 58 62 43 50 11 7 8 3 1
Grade D 3 4 0 4 1 19 17 0 14 50 3 2 0 1 1No Award 7 3 2 2 0 12 25 38 29 0 2 3 5 2 0
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 BiologyNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 36
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH ChemistryEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 5 5 2 10 2 3 3 5 1 6 4 5 6 1 8Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2011, 2008. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 2 5 2 4 3 37.7 36.1 37.6 36.8 37.3 4 5 6 1 8Male 6 4 3 3 2 35.5 36.1 36.9 36.8 37.3 2 2 3 1 3
Female 1 7 2 5 39.8 36.1 38.3 37.3 2 3 3 5
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -2.16 -0.38 -0.64 -4.73 -1.46 * 6.50 5.00 4.83 9.00 5.88Male -2.49 -0.53 -1.33 -4.65 -1.81 7.50 5.00 5.67 9.00 6.00
Female -1.78 -0.32 0.05 -1.20 ** 5.50 5.00 4.00 5.80
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -1.69 -0.82 -0.90 -3.58 -1.09 * 6.50 5.00 4.83 9.00 5.88Male -2.54 -0.51 -1.75 * -3.45 -0.92 7.50 5.00 5.67 9.00 6.00
Female -0.84 -0.92 -0.05 -1.12 * 5.50 5.00 4.00 5.80
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Chemistry Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Advanced Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Chemistry Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 4 5 0 0 0 25 20 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0Grades A-B 8 9 3 0 8 25 20 67 0 25 1 1 4 0 2Grades A-C 10 5 4 0 8 25 80 83 0 62 1 4 5 0 5
Grade D 2 0 0 0 4 25 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 1No Award 1 3 5 100 2 50 20 17 100 25 2 1 1 1 2
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher ChemistryNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 38
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH ChemistryEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 2 4 7 2 1 16 14 10 16 21 21 21 13 20 30Incomplete 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the second lowest of the 5 years on record. In most previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has been above the national pattern for this course.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 3 3 7 3 6 33.6 33.9 32.1 34.9 32.9 21 21 12 20 30Male 6 3 7 3 7 32.0 33.9 31.8 33.6 31.6 13 7 7 12 16
Female 1 5 8 2 4 36.2 33.9 32.5 36.8 34.4 8 14 5 8 14
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.31 0.18 0.11 0.52 -0.03 4.05 4.14 4.83 3.55 4.57Male 0.90 ** 0.15 -0.13 0.53 -0.27 3.77 3.86 4.86 3.75 4.88
Female -0.82 0.35 0.35 0.32 0.20 4.50 4.29 4.80 3.25 4.21
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.14 -0.35 0.07 0.05 -0.08 4.05 4.14 4.83 3.55 4.55Male 0.05 -0.40 0.57 0.04 -0.32 3.77 3.86 4.86 3.75 4.88
Female -0.55 -0.22 -0.66 -0.04 0.17 4.50 4.29 4.80 3.25 4.15
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 39
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Chemistry Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Chemistry Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In most previous years awards at Grades A-C have been above the national pattern for this course.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 8 5 4 2 3 14 24 31 40 33 3 5 4 8 10Grades A-B 3 4 8 2 7 62 52 38 65 43 13 11 5 13 13Grades A-C 2 4 10 2 8 90 81 46 90 70 19 17 6 18 21
Grade D 7 2 1 6 2 5 19 46 10 17 1 4 6 2 5No Award 8 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 4
Course Comparisons Higher ChemistryCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 8. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is less than the school in the middle of the rank order by -0.07.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
St Joseph's College (D&G) 32.9 4.04 7 0.48 26 11 6 23 88 2 1 4 2Loudoun Academy (EA) 32.9 4.06 7 0.39 16 7 9 13 81 4 0 0 0Larbert High (Fal) 33.0 4.18 7 0.25 67 14 4 50 75 7 0 0 0Strathaven Academy (SL) 32.9 4.30 6 0.13 37 18 2 30 81 4 0 0 0Douglas Ewart High (D&G) 32.9 4.46 5 0.01 13 8 8 10 77 6 0 0 0Dumbarton Academy (WD) 33.0 4.50 5 -0.03 12 7 9 8 67 8 0 0 0Lanark Grammar School (SL) 32.9 4.57 5 -0.06 23 8 8 18 78 5 0 0 0Lochgilphead High (A&B) 32.9 4.57 5 -0.03 30 21 1 21 70 8 0 0 0Webster's High (Ang) 33.0 4.78 4 -0.30 32 16 3 23 72 7 0 0 0Preston Lodge High (EL) 33.0 5.12 3 -0.64 * 25 11 6 18 72 7 0 0 0St Andrew's Academy (Ren) 32.9 5.23 2 -0.71 ** 22 7 9 15 68 8 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 40
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 ChemistryEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is below the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 5 3 2 7 4 6 7 3 5 9 9 4Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 7 8 5 3 24.0 23.4 25.2 27.2 5 9 9 4Male 6 8 5 2 23.6 22.3 23.8 26.5 3 6 7 3
Female 7 5 2 2 24.7 25.4 30.0 29.3 2 3 2 1
Progression Value
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.45 0.18 1.01 0.91 4.40 5.67 4.00 4.00Male 1.21 -0.01 1.37 ** 1.02 3.67 6.00 3.86 4.00
Female -0.74 0.41 -0.66 0.36 5.50 5.00 4.50 4.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.67 0.22 0.52 1.60 4.40 5.67 4.00 4.33Male 1.38 0.09 0.86 0.83 3.67 6.00 3.80 4.50
Female -0.53 0.33 -0.07 3.28 5.50 5.00 4.50 4.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Chemistry Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Chemistry Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 4 0 2 0 20 0 33 0 1 0 3 0Grades A-B 4 7 3 1 60 22 56 75 3 2 5 3Grades A-C 5 5 3 100 80 67 89 100 4 6 8 4
Grade D 2 1 4 0 20 33 11 0 1 3 1 0No Award 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 ChemistryNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 42
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH PhysicsEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 5 1 3 8 1 2 5 4 2 5 3 8 5 2 7Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is below the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2011, 2008. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 10 6 3 2 7 31.3 35.5 37.0 37.4 34.7 3 8 5 2 7Male 10 6 2 2 6 31.6 35.1 36.8 36.8 35.3 2 5 2 1 6
Female 5 3 10 37.1 38.0 31.5 3 1 1
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1.07 0.31 0.22 0.15 -0.10 4.67 4.13 3.60 3.50 4.71Male 0.54 -0.45 -0.17 -1.10 0.10 5.00 5.00 4.00 5.00 4.33
Female 0.65 1.26 -0.80 3.33 2.00 7.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 2.35 ** 0.85 0.82 0.29 -0.42 3.50 3.33 3.60 3.50 4.71Male 2.40 0.12 1.10 0.96 -0.50 3.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 4.33
Female 3.25 1.63 0.60 -0.58 -0.39 4.00 2.67 3.33 2.00 7.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Physics Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Advanced Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Physics Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 5 3 2 5 0 25 40 50 29 0 2 2 1 2Grades A-B 4 5 2 6 7 67 62 80 50 43 2 5 4 1 3Grades A-C 7 6 100 100 7 67 75 100 100 71 2 6 5 2 5
Grade D 1 3 0 0 2 33 12 0 0 14 1 1 0 0 1No Award 0 4 0 0 4 0 12 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 1
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher PhysicsNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 44
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH PhysicsEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 3 7 5 3 3 14 10 11 13 14 18 15 15 17 20Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the second highest of the 5 years on record. In all previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has been above the national pattern for this course.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 2 4 3 2 3 34.3 33.1 33.4 34.6 34.4 18 15 15 17 20Male 2 8 5 2 4 33.6 30.1 31.9 34.2 32.8 12 8 9 12 15
Female 3 2 4 3 1 35.6 36.5 35.7 35.7 39.3 6 7 6 5 5
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4. The current performance has significantly declined from that of last year.In the current year, boy's attainment was significantly poorer than that of girls.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.98 ** -0.54 -0.75 0.72 ** -0.66 D 3.11 4.80 5.07 3.24 4.80Male 1.34 *** -0.38 -0.65 0.46 -1.25 ** D 2.83 5.50 5.33 3.50 5.73
Female 0.31 -0.56 -0.80 1.29 *** 0.85 ** 3.67 4.00 4.67 2.60 2.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.86 ** -0.66 -0.76 0.41 -0.37 3.00 4.80 5.14 3.24 4.74Male 0.88 * -1.03 -0.39 0.16 -0.97 ** D 2.64 5.50 5.33 3.50 5.71
Female 0.92 * -0.06 -1.41 0.97 ** 1.24 ** 3.67 4.00 4.80 2.60 2.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 45
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Physics Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Physics Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 2 3 8 3 4 39 33 13 35 30 7 5 2 6 6Grades A-B 1 7 6 1 6 72 47 47 76 45 13 7 7 13 9Grades A-C 100 7 8 100 8 100 67 67 100 60 18 10 10 17 12
Grade D 0 3 1 0 2 0 13 27 0 20 0 2 4 0 4No Award 0 3 7 0 3 0 20 7 0 20 0 3 1 0 4
Course Comparisons Higher PhysicsCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 10. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is less than the school in the middle of the rank order by -0.88.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
King's Park Sec School (Gla) 34.5 3.05 10 1.00 ** 20 9 7 19 95 1 0 0 0Coltness High School (NL) 34.4 3.09 10 0.98 ** 22 11 5 19 86 3 0 0 0Grove Academy (Dun) 34.3 3.25 10 0.87 *** 44 15 2 40 91 1 0 0 0Caldervale High School (NL) 34.3 3.55 9 0.57 20 9 7 19 95 1 0 0 0Our Lady's HS Cumbern'ld (NL) 34.4 3.64 9 0.44 26 11 5 24 92 1 0 0 0Cardinal Newman HS (NL) 34.4 3.92 8 0.16 14 5 10 11 79 4 2 14 1Notre Dame HS (Inv) 34.4 4.21 7 -0.14 19 8 8 15 79 4 0 0 0Breadalbane Academy (P&K) 34.3 4.43 6 -0.33 14 9 7 9 64 8 0 0 0Beeslack Community High (Mid) 34.5 4.45 6 -0.38 30 13 4 21 70 6 1 3 3Lochgilphead High (A&B) 34.4 4.80 5 -0.66 20 14 3 12 60 8 0 0 0Carluke High School (SL) 34.4 5.57 2 -1.45 *** 23 8 8 16 70 6 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 46
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 PhysicsEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 9 5 8 6 1 2 4 2 3 8 2 6 3 4 12Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2011, 2010, 2008. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 7 8 4 3 4 23.7 23.6 26.1 26.3 26.0 2 6 3 4 12Male 6 6 3 3 6 23.7 23.6 26.1 26.3 23.9 2 4 3 4 8
Female 8 3 23.5 30.1 2 4
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.60 0.09 2.56 -1.90 ** 0.83 4.50 5.67 2.67 7.25 4.42Male 0.55 -0.58 2.55 -1.98 ** 0.63 4.50 6.25 2.67 7.25 5.00
Female 1.69 1.14 4.50 3.25
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.89 0.74 3.18 ** -1.88 * 1.07 4.50 5.50 2.67 8.33 4.75Male 0.88 0.41 3.15 ** -1.90 * 0.98 4.50 5.67 2.67 8.33 4.86
Female 1.87 4.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Physics Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Physics Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is well above the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 33 0 8 0 0 1 0 1Grades A-B 4 5 100 5 1 50 33 100 25 67 1 2 3 1 8Grades A-C 100 5 100 9 2 100 67 100 25 83 2 4 3 1 10
Grade D 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 1 0No Award 0 3 0 2 5 0 33 0 50 17 0 2 0 2 2
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 PhysicsCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 4. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is greater than the school in the middle of the rank order by 0.86.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Turnbull High (ED) 25.9 3.33 10 1.94 *** 12 7 2 12 100 100 0 0 0John Ogilvie HS (SL) 25.9 4.14 9 1.10 ** 14 6 2 12 86 2 0 0 0Lossiemouth High (Mor) 26.0 4.17 9 1.09 ** 17 10 1 10 59 5 5 29 1Lochgilphead High (A&B) 26.0 4.42 9 0.83 12 8 1 10 83 2 0 0 0Inverurie Academy (Abs) 25.8 4.73 8 0.56 12 6 3 9 75 3 1 8 4Clydebank High (WD) 26.2 5.27 6 -0.08 11 4 6 8 73 3 0 0 0Cults Academy (AbC) 25.8 5.73 5 -0.44 11 4 6 10 91 2 0 0 0Whitburn Academy (WL) 25.9 6.00 4 -0.74 13 6 2 7 54 6 0 0 0Dyce Academy (AbC) 26.2 6.08 4 -0.88 * 14 12 1 9 64 5 1 7 4Lasswade High (Mid) 26.1 6.20 3 -0.96 *** 11 4 6 6 55 6 0 0 0Grange Academy (EA) 26.1 6.40 3 -1.19 ** 14 5 4 5 36 8 4 29 1The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 48
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt1 PhysicsEntries and Incomplete AwardsThere are insufficient data for meaningful analysis.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 2 1 2 1Incomplete 0 0 0 0There are no PV data for this course.
No Scatterplots for this course in 2012Attainment - Awards
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 50 0 1 0Grades A-B 100 100 2 1Grades A-C 100 100 2 1
Grade D 0 0 0 0No Award 0 0 0 0
There are no PV data for 2012 and so no comparisons can be made.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 49
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH GeographyEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. There were no incomplete awards in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 7 1 3 2 6 3 2 7 4Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 4 10 2 34.6 29.7 37.0 2 7 4Male 3 9 1 34.6 29.5 39.3 2 5 2
Female 9 5 30.1 34.8 2 2
Progression Value
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -0.92 -2.82 *** -1.49 *** 5.50 8.00 5.25Male -0.76 -3.18 *** -1.60 5.50 8.60 5.00
Female -1.48 *** -1.53 ** 6.50 5.50
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -0.65 -3.53 *** -1.19 * 5.50 7.25 5.25Male
Female
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 50
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Geography Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Advanced Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Geography Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Grades A-B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Grades A-C 100 10 100 100 14 100 2 1 4
Grade D 0 2 0 0 14 0 0 1 0No Award 0 1 0 0 71 0 0 5 0
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher GeographyNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 51
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH GeographyEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In all previous years entries have been well above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 3 3 1 1 2 13 13 21 21 16 17 20 28 27 23Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is below the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the lowest of the 5 years on record. In most previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has been above the national pattern for this course.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 2 2 4 6 7 32.1 31.8 30.9 29.6 29.0 17 20 28 27 23Male 3 4 4 7 6 30.9 30.1 30.0 28.9 29.1 9 8 13 9 13
Female 2 2 4 7 8 33.6 33.0 31.6 29.9 28.9 8 12 15 18 10
Progression ValueAt the 90% confidence level, on average, All Candidates attained a significantly better band in the current year than is predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4. On average, approximately one in two pupils achieved one band better than predicted.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.18 0.10 -0.05 0.68 ** 0.58 * 3.94 4.20 4.61 3.93 4.17Male 0.56 -1.32 *** 0.33 0.28 0.70 4.00 6.25 4.62 4.67 4.15
Female -0.24 0.99 * -0.42 0.78 *** 0.47 3.88 2.83 4.60 3.56 4.20
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.05 -0.21 -0.23 0.30 0.28 3.94 4.20 4.56 3.83 4.17Male 0.00 -1.52 *** 0.21 0.10 0.49 4.00 6.25 4.50 4.14 4.15
Female -0.06 0.59 -0.60 0.26 0.07 3.88 2.83 4.60 3.71 4.20
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 52
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Geography Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Geography Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is above the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 3 2 4 5 9 35 40 25 30 9 6 8 7 8 2Grades A-B 3 3 4 4 3 65 60 50 59 70 11 12 14 16 16Grades A-C 3 5 5 4 4 82 75 75 85 83 14 15 21 23 19
Grade D 0 7 4 3 7 0 5 11 11 4 0 1 3 3 1No Award 5 4 5 8 5 18 20 14 4 13 3 4 4 1 3
Course Comparisons Higher GeographyCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 3. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is greater than the school in the middle of the rank order by 0.37.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Kingussie High (Hig) 29.1 3.50 9 1.15 ** 10 9 6 10 100 100 0 0 0Hamilton Grammar School (SL) 29.2 3.94 7 0.76 *** 65 21 1 58 89 3 1 2 2Lochgilphead High (A&B) 29.0 4.17 6 0.58 * 23 16 2 19 83 4 0 0 0Breadalbane Academy (P&K) 28.9 4.29 6 0.45 35 22 1 30 86 4 0 0 0Falkirk High (Fal) 28.9 4.50 5 0.30 14 5 8 9 64 8 0 0 0Kirkcaldy High (Fif) 29.2 4.55 5 0.12 11 4 9 8 73 7 0 0 0Currie High (Edi) 28.9 4.65 5 0.13 17 7 7 13 76 6 0 0 0Alford Academy (Abs) 28.9 4.75 4 0.02 16 13 3 12 75 6 0 0 0Coatbridge High School (NL) 29.2 4.91 4 -0.22 23 9 5 18 78 5 0 0 0Turriff Academy (Abs) 29.0 5.25 3 -0.51 24 14 2 16 67 8 0 0 0Chryston High (NL) 29.1 5.94 2 -1.20 ** 17 10 4 8 47 10 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 53
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 GeographyEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In all previous years entries have been well above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 1 1 2 1 1 9 7 6 7 9 12 11 8 9 13Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the second lowest of the 5 years on record. In most previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has been above the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1 8 2 4 4 25.6 19.9 24.0 23.1 23.0 12 11 8 9 13Male 2 8 4 5 5 24.7 19.7 22.8 22.3 22.1 6 8 4 6 9
Female 1 8 2 3 2 26.4 20.6 25.3 24.7 24.9 6 3 4 3 4
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.67 1.51 * 0.58 0.71 1.36 ** 3.67 3.91 4.13 4.22 3.62Male 0.76 2.11 *** 0.35 0.19 1.05 3.83 3.50 4.75 5.00 4.22
Female 0.56 -0.07 0.75 1.72 ** 2.20 * 3.50 5.00 3.50 2.67 2.25
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.84 0.99 1.02 * 0.86 1.36 ** 4.00 4.13 4.13 4.29 3.62Male 1.63 1.47 0.47 0.56 0.83 3.50 3.60 4.75 4.80 4.22
Female -0.03 0.28 1.50 1.36 2.61 ** 4.50 5.00 3.50 3.00 2.25
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 54
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Geography Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Geography Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is above the national pattern for this course in the current year. In most previous years awards at Grades A-C have been above the national pattern for this course.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 1 2 5 2 2 58 45 12 33 38 7 5 1 3 5Grades A-B 2 4 2 2 1 67 64 75 67 85 8 7 6 6 11Grades A-C 5 4 100 3 3 75 91 100 89 92 9 10 8 8 12
Grade D 2 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0No Award 6 5 0 6 6 8 9 0 11 8 1 1 0 1 1
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 GeographyCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 1. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is greater than the school in the middle of the rank order by 1.45.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Lochgilphead High (A&B) 23.0 3.62 9 1.36 ** 13 9 1 12 92 3 0 0 0Dunbar Grammar (EL) 22.7 4.00 8 0.99 14 8 1 12 86 3 0 0 0St Andrew's Academy (Ren) 22.6 4.64 7 0.42 15 5 3 14 93 3 0 0 0St Andrew's & St Bride's (SL) 22.7 4.78 7 0.23 18 5 3 14 78 5 0 0 0St Andrew's HS (NL) 22.5 5.00 6 0.04 12 3 5 8 67 6 2 17 1Holy Cross High School (SL) 23.2 5.06 6 -0.15 16 5 3 12 75 5 0 0 0Carluke High School (SL) 23.1 5.18 6 -0.27 17 6 2 14 82 4 0 0 0Douglas Academy (ED) 23.0 5.33 5 -0.37 12 4 4 10 83 4 0 0 0Lockerbie Academy (D&G) 23.3 5.40 5 -0.48 15 8 1 11 73 5 0 0 0Kelso High (ScB) 23.3 6.60 3 -1.70 ** 10 6 2 4 40 8 0 0 0St Thomas of Aquin's HS (Edi) 22.5 6.89 2 -1.80 *** 18 9 1 6 33 9 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 55
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt1 GeographyEntries and Incomplete AwardsThere are insufficient data for meaningful analysis.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 2 2 1 2 3 2Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0There are no PV data for this course.
No Scatterplots for this course in 2012Attainment - Awards
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 50 0 50 1 0 1Grades A-B 50 0 50 1 0 1Grades A-C 50 0 100 1 0 2
Grade D 50 33 0 1 1 0No Award 0 67 0 0 2 0
There are no PV data for 2012 and so no comparisons can be made.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 56
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH HistoryEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 6 10 2 7 1 2 1 4 2 4 2 1 5 2 6Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2011, 2009, 2008. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 8 1 6 5 6 31.5 38.0 33.1 33.2 32.1 1 1 5 2 6Male 7 4 5 31.5 35.0 32.8 1 2 2
Female 1 9 6 7 38.0 31.8 33.2 31.8 1 3 2 4
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 3.11 0.16 1.51 ** -0.05 0.96 2.00 3.00 2.40 4.50 3.67Male 3.02 0.97 1.56 ** 2.00 2.50 3.00
Female 0.17 1.93 ** 0.02 0.63 3.00 2.33 4.50 4.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1.46 -0.71 1.55 -0.04 -0.24 2.00 3.00 1.00 4.50 4.00Male
Female -0.76 -0.21 -1.73 3.00 4.50 5.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 57
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher History Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Advanced Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher History Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 100 0 3 0 5 100 0 60 0 17 2 0 3 0 1Grades A-B 100 100 100 5 3 100 100 100 50 83 2 1 5 1 5Grades A-C 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2 1 5 2 6
Grade D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0No Award 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher HistoryNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 58
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH HistoryEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 2 5 3 5 3 16 11 14 11 14 21 17 19 14 20Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the second lowest of the 5 years on record. In most previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has been above the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 1 2 5 2 4 34.1 32.4 29.8 31.6 31.0 21 17 19 14 20Male 1 1 4 3 2 32.4 35.6 29.9 31.1 31.6 8 4 6 6 5
Female 1 4 7 3 5 35.1 31.4 29.7 32.0 30.8 13 13 13 8 15
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 1.69 *** 0.77 0.47 * 0.41 -0.32 2.00 3.18 4.05 3.50 4.60Male 2.20 *** 1.16 0.36 0.58 -1.42 * D 1.88 2.00 4.17 3.50 5.60
Female 1.35 *** 0.68 0.50 0.30 0.02 2.08 3.54 4.00 3.50 4.27
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 1.37 *** 0.84 * 0.24 0.47 -0.35 2.05 3.18 4.05 3.50 4.58Male 1.83 *** 1.11 ** 0.93 ** 0.79 * -1.07 1.88 2.00 4.17 3.50 5.75
Female 1.07 *** 0.78 -0.12 0.24 -0.20 2.17 3.54 4.00 3.50 4.27
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 59
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher History Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher History Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is above the national pattern for this course in the current year. In most previous years every pupil gained an award at Grades A-C.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 1 1 8 2 7 90 47 11 43 15 19 8 2 6 3Grades A-B 100 2 3 4 7 100 71 68 64 45 21 12 13 9 9Grades A-C 100 3 100 100 3 100 94 100 100 90 21 16 19 14 18
Grade D 0 5 0 0 5 0 6 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1No Award 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1
Course Comparisons Higher HistoryCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 6.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
St Andrew's & St Bride's (SL) 31.0 3.71 8 0.51 ** 73 19 2 65 89 3 1 1 2Earlston High (ScB) 30.9 3.85 7 0.40 53 22 1 46 87 4 0 0 0Denny High (Fal) 30.9 4.00 7 0.26 35 11 6 26 74 7 1 3 2Hyndland Sec School (Gla) 31.0 4.05 7 0.19 43 16 3 35 81 5 0 0 0Gordon Schools,The (Abs) 31.0 4.14 7 0.11 23 12 5 21 91 3 0 0 0Lochgilphead High (A&B) 31.0 4.60 5 -0.32 20 14 3 18 90 3 0 0 0Dumbarton Academy (WD) 31.0 4.92 4 -0.68 12 7 9 9 75 7 0 0 0Preston Lodge High (EL) 31.0 5.05 4 -0.79 * 21 9 7 15 71 7 0 0 0St Aidan's High School (NL) 31.0 5.10 4 -0.87 ** 30 10 6 23 77 6 1 3 2St Mungo's RC High (Fal) 31.0 5.40 3 -1.16 11 3 10 6 55 9 0 0 0Breadalbane Academy (P&K) 30.9 5.83 2 -1.59 ** 12 8 8 6 50 9 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 60
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 HistoryEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 2 2 4 10 1 8 7 5 1 9 10 11 7 1 13Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2011. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1 5 5 6 5 26.4 21.9 22.3 21.0 21.7 10 11 7 1 13Male 1 6 5 6 4 26.0 21.0 21.7 21.0 21.7 4 4 4 1 9
Female 1 5 4 6 26.6 22.3 23.0 21.6 6 7 3 4
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -0.78 -1.42 ** 0.15 1.35 -0.92 * 5.30 6.82 5.14 4.00 6.08Male -0.76 -1.42 -0.10 1.46 -0.60 5.50 7.00 5.50 4.00 5.78
Female -0.80 -1.45 0.45 -1.61 5.17 6.71 4.67 6.75
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.11 -1.26 ** 0.16 -1.23 ** 5.38 6.60 5.14 6.33Male -0.69 -1.27 * -0.05 -0.65 6.00 6.33 5.50 5.78
Female 0.40 -1.24 0.44 -2.86 ** 5.17 6.71 4.67 8.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 61
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 History Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 History Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In most previous years awards at Grades A-C have been above the national pattern for this course.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 4 0 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 1Grades A-B 6 8 6 100 8 30 9 29 100 15 3 1 2 1 2Grades A-C 4 9 4 100 8 80 36 86 100 54 8 4 6 1 7
Grade D 5 1 0 0 2 10 36 0 0 23 1 4 0 0 3No Award 6 4 5 0 3 10 27 14 0 23 1 3 1 0 3
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 HistoryCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 9. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is less than the school in the middle of the rank order by -1.44.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Gleniffer High School (Ren) 21.6 3.40 10 1.77 ** 10 3 7 8 80 5 0 0 0Berwickshire High (ScB) 21.7 3.78 9 1.38 *** 18 8 2 18 100 100 0 0 0Denny High (Fal) 21.7 3.91 9 1.23 *** 12 4 6 10 83 4 1 8 2St Andrew's Sec School (Gla) 21.7 4.10 8 1.04 *** 48 14 1 44 92 3 0 0 0Cardinal Newman HS (NL) 21.6 4.55 7 0.62 14 5 4 10 71 6 3 21 1Grange Academy (EA) 21.6 4.63 7 0.52 * 33 11 1 26 79 5 3 9 1Campbeltown Grammar (A&B) 21.9 5.31 5 -0.20 13 8 2 10 77 5 0 0 0Bathgate Academy (WL) 21.9 5.85 4 -0.73 ** 13 6 3 8 62 7 0 0 0Lochgilphead High (A&B) 21.7 6.08 3 -0.92 * 13 9 1 7 54 8 0 0 0Hamilton Grammar School (SL) 21.4 6.13 3 -0.93 * 17 6 4 9 53 8 1 6 2Holy Cross High School (SL) 21.7 7.54 1 -2.41 *** 13 4 6 3 23 10 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 62
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt1 HistoryEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is below the national pattern in the current year. There were no incomplete awards in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 2 8 1 3 3 1 1 4 4 1Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 4 3 3 8 17.1 18.2 18.7 15.2 1 4 4 1Male
Female
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -3.77 -1.40 -0.97 -2.61 9.00 6.25 5.50 8.00Male
Female
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -0.31 -2.47 5.50 8.00Male
Female
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 63
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 1 History Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 1 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 1 History Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsNo pupil passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Grades A-B 4 0 0 25 50 0 0 1 2 0Grades A-C 6 0 0 50 75 0 0 2 3 0
Grade D 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 1 0 0No Award 1 100 100 25 25 100 1 1 1 1
Course Comparisons Intermediate 1 HistoryNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 64
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH AdministrationEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In all previous years entries have been well above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 2 2 1 1 2 8 10 11 13 8 10 15 15 16 11Incomplete 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the third highest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 3 4 5 6 6 28.6 28.4 27.3 27.4 27.5 10 14 15 16 11Male 1 5 3 9 5 35.5 27.3 29.0 24.7 27.6 1 5 3 3 5
Female 5 3 7 5 7 27.8 29.0 26.9 28.1 27.4 9 9 12 13 6
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.97 * -0.99 ** 1.24 -1.17 *** -0.30 4.70 6.29 3.40 6.31 5.45Male 1.57 -1.78 *** -1.04 -2.01 -0.93 2.00 7.20 5.33 8.00 6.00
Female 0.88 -0.60 1.82 ** -0.98 ** 0.21 5.00 5.78 2.92 5.92 5.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.94 -1.00 * 1.80 ** -1.67 ** -0.81 4.38 6.29 2.36 6.46 5.45Male 2.28 -2.05 * -3.54 ** -1.48 2.00 7.20 9.00 6.00
Female 0.73 -0.39 1.74 ** -1.35 * -0.15 4.71 5.78 2.36 6.00 5.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 65
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Administration Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Administration Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is in line with the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 2 5 1 7 6 20 7 67 6 9 2 1 10 1 1Grades A-B 3 9 2 7 8 40 7 73 25 27 4 1 11 4 3Grades A-C 2 7 5 8 5 80 60 80 56 73 8 9 12 9 8
Grade D 3 5 0 3 2 20 13 0 12 18 2 2 0 2 2No Award 0 4 3 3 7 0 20 20 31 9 0 3 3 5 1
Course Comparisons Higher AdministrationCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 5. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is greater than the school in the middle of the rank order by 0.02.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Broxburn Academy (WL) 27.3 3.75 9 1.43 *** 20 9 1 17 85 3 0 0 0Braes High (Fal) 27.5 4.36 7 0.77 11 5 5 9 82 4 0 0 0Stromness Academy (Ork) 27.3 5.33 5 -0.14 12 12 1 9 75 5 0 0 0Lanark Grammar School (SL) 27.5 5.45 4 -0.34 11 4 6 8 73 5 0 0 0Lochgilphead High (A&B) 27.5 5.45 4 -0.30 11 8 2 8 73 5 0 0 0Fraserburgh Academy (Abs) 27.5 5.47 4 -0.34 19 9 2 12 63 7 0 0 0Holy Rood High (Edi) 27.6 5.75 3 -0.66 28 13 1 19 68 6 0 0 0St Stephen's HS (Inv) 27.4 6.06 3 -0.95 17 13 1 8 47 9 0 0 0St Paul's RC Academy (Dun) 27.3 6.43 2 -1.24 * 14 6 3 5 36 9 0 0 0Calderglen High School (SL) 27.2 6.52 2 -1.31 *** 27 6 3 12 44 9 0 0 0Caldervale High School (NL) 27.6 6.83 2 -1.78 ** 12 6 4 6 50 8 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 66
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 AdministrationEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is in line with the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 1 3 1 6 5 9 7 11 4 4 12 11 14 5 6Incomplete 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is below the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the second lowest of the 5 years on record. In most previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has been in line with the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 6 7 5 6 7 21.2 20.8 22.2 21.6 21.1 12 10 14 5 6Male 6 6 5 4 6 21.0 21.7 22.3 23.3 20.9 4 4 3 3 2
Female 6 8 5 9 7 21.3 20.2 22.2 19.1 21.2 8 6 11 2 4
Progression ValueAt the 99% confidence level, on average, All Candidates attained a significantly poorer band in the current year than is predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4. On average, pupils achieved one band or more poorer than predicted. The current performance has significantly declined from those of the last four years.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 1.43 ** 0.39 -0.36 0.71 ** -1.67 *** D 3.67 4.30 5.07 4.60 7.33Male -0.06 0.76 -0.20 0.77 -2.16 5.25 4.00 5.00 4.33 8.00
Female 2.19 *** 0.20 -0.41 0.96 -1.30 * 2.88 4.50 5.09 5.00 7.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1.80 *** 0.99 ** 0.15 1.17 ** -2.01 *** 3.36 3.50 4.83 4.60 7.33Male 0.23 1.63 * 0.11 1.65 * -2.64 4.67 3.00 5.00 4.33 8.00
Female 2.43 *** 0.67 0.12 0.78 -1.67 ** 2.88 3.80 4.78 5.00 7.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 67
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Administration Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Administration Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes in the current year, is below the national pattern, however the pupil numbers involved are small. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 4 5 0 0 0 17 18 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0Grades A-B 2 5 6 5 0 75 55 43 40 0 9 6 6 2 0Grades A-C 2 8 6 100 9 92 73 79 100 33 11 8 11 5 2
Grade D 5 4 3 0 1 8 9 14 0 33 1 1 2 0 2No Award 0 4 6 0 3 0 9 7 0 33 0 1 1 0 2
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 AdministrationNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 68
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt1 AdministrationEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been below the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 6 8 8 3 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 5Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2011, 2010, 2009. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 7 10 9 6 15.6 14.0 14.4 16.5 2 1 1 5Male
Female 9 9 7 14.0 14.4 16.4 1 1 4
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -1.97 -0.71 -4.12 -1.40 6.50 5.00 9.00 5.00Male
Female -0.95 -4.20 -1.52 5.00 9.00 5.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -1.33 -5.31 -0.59 6.50 9.00 4.00Male
Female
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 69
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 1 Administration Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 1 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 1 Administration Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes in the current year, is below the national pattern, however the pupil numbers involved are small. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 1Grades A-B 5 0 0 9 50 0 0 40 1 0 0 2Grades A-C 8 100 0 9 50 100 0 60 1 1 0 3
Grade D 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 1No Award 1 0 100 1 50 0 100 20 1 0 1 1
Course Comparisons Intermediate 1 AdministrationNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 70
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH Business ManagementEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is in line with the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 7 5 1 2 6 6 9 17 15 8 8 13 22 19 11Incomplete 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the second lowest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 2 3 5 7 6 32.0 31.0 29.8 28.9 29.6 8 13 21 19 11Male 6 1 6 3 7 28.9 33.9 28.9 30.9 28.1 2 6 8 8 5
Female 2 7 5 9 4 33.0 28.5 30.3 27.4 30.8 6 7 13 11 6
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.35 -0.14 0.02 -1.11 ** 0.60 5.25 4.69 5.33 6.79 4.27Male 0.40 0.25 -0.20 -1.48 * 0.89 5.50 3.83 5.88 6.88 4.40
Female -0.72 -0.40 0.14 -0.83 0.34 5.17 5.43 5.00 6.73 4.17
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.34 -0.22 -0.02 -1.41 *** 0.41 5.14 4.92 5.26 6.79 4.27Male -0.79 0.05 -0.06 -1.73 ** 1.27 5.50 4.20 5.71 6.88 4.40
Female -0.20 -0.41 0.00 -1.21 ** -0.34 5.00 5.43 5.00 6.73 4.17
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 71
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Business Management Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Business Management Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is well above the national pattern for this course in the current year. In most previous years awards at Grades A-C have been in line with the national pattern for this course.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 2 3 5 0 8 25 31 14 0 9 2 4 3 0 1Grades A-B 3 6 5 10 1 50 46 41 11 82 4 6 9 2 9Grades A-C 6 6 6 9 2 62 77 68 47 91 5 10 15 9 10
Grade D 0 5 7 3 0 0 8 5 16 0 0 1 1 3 0No Award 3 5 5 2 7 38 15 23 37 9 3 2 5 7 1
Course Comparisons Higher Business ManagementCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 4. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is greater than the school in the middle of the rank order by 0.15.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Duncanrig Sec School (SL) 29.6 3.96 9 0.89 ** 27 7 7 21 78 5 1 4 2Culloden Academy (Hig) 29.6 4.05 8 0.84 ** 23 8 5 18 78 5 1 4 2Campbeltown Grammar (A&B) 29.6 4.21 8 0.63 14 9 5 12 86 3 0 0 0Lochgilphead High (A&B) 29.6 4.27 7 0.60 11 8 6 10 91 2 0 0 0Oldmachar Academy (AbC) 29.6 4.38 7 0.44 13 5 8 11 85 3 0 0 0Bell Baxter High (Fif) 29.6 4.42 7 0.44 52 11 3 40 77 5 0 0 0St Margaret's Academy (WL) 29.6 4.59 6 0.29 27 9 4 20 74 6 0 0 0Greenwood Academy (NA) 29.6 4.69 6 0.18 17 5 9 12 71 7 0 0 0St Matthew's Academy (NA) 29.6 4.76 6 0.09 33 10 4 27 82 4 0 0 0Wallace Hall Academy (D&G) 29.6 5.17 4 -0.31 23 13 3 18 78 5 0 0 0Hermitage Academy (A&B) 29.6 6.00 2 -1.15 *** 23 6 8 14 61 8 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 72
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 Business ManagementEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well below the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been below the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 8 7 5 10 2 2 3 1 2 3 4 1Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 5 10 1 1 23.8 18.8 26.0 29.8 2 3 4 1Male 9 2 1 19.7 26.0 29.8 2 4 1
Female 5 10 23.8 17.0 2 1
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.70 -2.40 * -0.63 -0.61 3.00 8.00 5.00 4.00Male -3.31 ** -0.50 -0.48 8.50 5.00 4.00
Female 0.63 -0.59 3.00 7.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates No RV data for this course in 2012
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 1.11 -3.01 *** -0.56 3.00 8.00 5.67Male -3.43 ** -0.40 8.50 5.67
Female 1.11 -2.80 3.00 7.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 73
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Business Management Progression Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 3 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 1 0 0 0Grades A-B 100 0 4 100 100 0 50 100 2 0 2 1Grades A-C 100 0 5 100 100 0 75 100 2 0 3 1
Grade D 0 1 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 1 0 0No Award 0 1 2 0 0 67 25 0 0 2 1 0
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 Business ManagementNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 74
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH Graphic CommunicationEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. There were no incomplete awards in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 1 1 5 2 7Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 8 3 29.2 33.1 2 7Male 7 3 29.2 33.1 2 7
Female
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 1.84 -0.34 2.00 3.71Male 1.98 -0.17 2.00 3.71
Female
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.14 3.00Male
Female
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 75
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Graphic Communication Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Advanced Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Graphic Communication Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is below the national pattern for this course in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 5 100 43 2 3Grades A-B 6 100 71 2 5Grades A-C 8 100 86 2 6
Grade D 0 0 0 0 0No Award 2 0 14 0 1
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher Graphic CommunicationNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 76
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH Graphic CommunicationEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well below the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 6 9 3 9 5 3 9 3 6 5 11 4Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 6 1 2 5 29.0 32.8 31.6 29.7 6 5 11 4Male 5 1 1 3 29.0 33.1 32.4 30.4 6 3 8 2
Female 3 7 7 32.4 29.6 29.0 2 3 2
Progression Value
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 2.62 *** 0.44 1.31 *** 2.90 *** 1.83 3.40 2.73 1.50Male 2.50 *** -0.66 1.52 ** 2.64 1.83 4.33 2.25 1.50
Female 2.07 0.70 3.27 * 2.00 4.00 1.50
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 2.10 *** 0.87 1.16 ** 2.66 *** 1.80 3.50 2.80 1.50Male 1.98 *** 0.54 1.65 *** 2.68 1.80 5.00 2.29 1.50
Female 1.44 0.04 2.69 * 2.00 4.00 1.50
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 77
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Graphic Communication Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Graphic Communication Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 1 1 1 100 83 60 64 100 5 3 7 4Grades A-B 100 2 1 100 100 80 82 100 6 4 9 4Grades A-C 100 5 3 100 100 80 91 100 6 4 10 4
Grade D 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0No Award 0 3 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 1 0 0
Course Comparisons Higher Graphic CommunicationNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 78
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 Creative Cake ProductionEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. There were no incomplete awards in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 4 6 9Incomplete 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is below the national pattern for this course.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 8 19.5 9Male
Female 8 19.5 9
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -0.62 ** 2.89Male
Female -0.84 ** 2.89
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -1.02 * 3.17Male
Female
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 79
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Creative Cake Production Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Creative Cake Production Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 10 33 3Grades A-B 100 100 9Grades A-C 100 100 9
Grade D 0 0 0No Award 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 Creative Cake ProductionNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 80
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 Hospitality: Practical CookeryEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. In all previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years incomplete awards have been above the national pattern for this course.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 4 4 4 3 4 8 9 8 10 8 10 13 11 13 12Incomplete 3 4 1 0 0 10 8 18 0 0 1 1 2 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is below the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the lowest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 6 8 6 2 8 21.6 21.3 22.3 26.2 20.3 9 12 9 13 12Male 7 7 4 2 5 20.3 21.1 23.6 26.8 21.8 2 11 4 7 4
Female 6 6 7 3 9 22.0 22.5 21.3 25.4 19.6 7 1 5 6 8
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.42 -0.51 -0.82 -0.26 -1.11 ** 2.67 3.83 3.56 3.00 4.00Male -0.16 0.01 -1.16 -0.34 -1.78 4.00 3.91 4.25 3.43 5.00
Female 0.54 * -0.19 -0.43 0.10 -0.80 2.29 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.50
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -0.06 -0.70 -0.85 -0.49 -1.32 ** 3.17 3.83 3.50 3.43 4.00Male -0.16 -0.18 -1.12 -0.29 -2.07 4.00 3.91 4.33 3.67 5.33
Female 0.07 -0.05 -0.64 0.54 -1.13 * 2.75 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.50
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 81
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Hospitality: Practical Cookery Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Hospitality: Practical Cookery Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 7 6 10 4 10 30 38 18 54 17 3 5 2 7 2Grades A-B 6 9 10 6 8 80 46 64 77 75 8 6 7 10 9Grades A-C 7 6 10 100 8 90 92 82 100 92 9 12 9 13 11
Grade D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0No Award 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 1
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 Hospitality: Practical CookeryCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 10. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is less than the school in the middle of the rank order by -1.14.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Dalkeith High (Mid) 20.3 2.05 8 0.83 *** 41 18 1 39 95 7 1 2 3Calderside Academy (SL) 20.5 2.25 7 0.61 *** 28 9 4 28 100 100 0 0 0Clyde Valley HS (NL) 20.3 2.50 6 0.37 10 8 4 10 100 100 0 0 0Brannock High School (NL) 20.1 2.56 6 0.37 * 18 14 2 18 100 100 0 0 0Cardinal Newman HS (NL) 20.1 2.79 5 0.11 26 10 3 24 92 8 2 8 2Thurso High (Hig) 20.4 2.86 5 0.03 37 16 1 35 95 7 0 0 0Drumchapel High School (Gla) 20.5 3.00 4 -0.12 23 22 1 22 96 7 1 4 3Renfrew High School (Ren) 20.4 3.54 2 -0.67 * 15 8 5 14 93 7 1 7 2Castlehead High School (Ren) 20.5 3.64 2 -0.78 ** 14 8 5 14 100 100 0 0 0Lochgilphead High (A&B) 20.3 4.00 1 -1.11 ** 12 8 4 11 92 8 0 0 0Rosshall Academy (Gla) 20.2 4.62 1 -1.72 *** 34 12 2 28 82 10 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 82
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH Art and DesignEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In all previous years entries have been well above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 1 1 1 3 1 17 16 17 12 22 22 25 23 15 31Incomplete 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the third highest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 6 3 10 3 6 27.8 29.7 25.5 29.8 28.1 21 25 23 15 31Male 4 2 8 7 29.0 32.2 26.4 26.7 5 8 2 6
Female 7 5 9 3 6 27.4 28.5 25.5 30.3 28.5 16 17 23 13 25
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4. The current performance is significantly stronger than that of 2009.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -0.74 * -0.92 *** 0.01 0.02 0.12 4.67 4.84 4.96 4.00 4.26Male -2.14 ** -0.84 -1.10 0.21 6.20 4.63 6.00 4.67
Female -0.31 -0.92 ** -0.10 0.15 0.09 4.19 4.94 4.96 3.69 4.16
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -0.79 * -1.10 *** -0.10 0.16 -0.05 4.32 4.58 4.63 3.54 4.00Male -2.38 ** -1.19 -1.10 -0.12 6.20 4.71 5.00 4.40
Female -0.20 -0.94 ** -0.26 0.18 -0.04 3.64 4.50 4.63 3.42 3.89
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 83
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Art and Design Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Art and Design Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is in line with the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 6 7 7 3 3 23 12 9 33 29 5 3 2 5 9Grades A-B 8 7 5 5 5 45 40 52 60 55 10 10 12 9 17Grades A-C 9 6 7 6 5 77 88 83 87 90 17 22 19 13 28
Grade D 0 3 6 3 5 0 12 4 13 6 0 3 1 2 2No Award 1 0 2 0 5 18 0 13 0 3 4 0 3 0 1
Course Comparisons Higher Art and DesignCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 3. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is greater than the school in the middle of the rank order by 0.53.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Bell Baxter High (Fif) 28.0 2.73 10 1.67 *** 42 9 5 41 98 3 0 0 0Gordon Schools,The (Abs) 28.1 4.07 6 0.31 15 8 7 14 93 4 0 0 0Lochgilphead High (A&B) 28.1 4.26 6 0.12 31 22 1 28 90 5 0 0 0Penicuik High (Mid) 28.1 4.41 5 -0.02 17 10 4 17 100 100 0 0 0Tobermory High (A&B) 28.2 4.45 5 -0.07 11 27 1 10 91 5 0 0 0Chryston High (NL) 28.1 4.79 4 -0.42 24 14 1 18 75 8 0 0 0Lasswade High (Mid) 28.1 4.93 4 -0.57 ** 30 10 4 26 87 6 0 0 0Falkirk High (Fal) 28.0 5.00 3 -0.61 ** 28 11 3 23 82 7 0 0 0Rosshall Academy (Gla) 28.1 5.16 3 -0.80 *** 25 9 6 20 80 7 0 0 0Grantown Grammar (Hig) 28.2 5.45 2 -1.08 ** 12 12 2 8 67 9 1 8 1Deans Community High (WL) 28.2 5.50 2 -1.11 *** 17 8 6 14 82 7 1 6 1The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 84
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 Art and DesignEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is below the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In most previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 3 3 4 5 8 5 6 5 4 2 7 9 6 5 3Incomplete 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 3 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 7 6 10 5 1 20.1 21.4 17.3 22.2 27.2 7 9 6 2 3Male 7 10 8 5 1 19.8 13.4 19.0 22.2 29.8 2 1 1 2 1
Female 7 4 10 1 20.2 22.4 16.9 26.0 5 8 5 2
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -0.43 -1.91 ** 0.87 1.10 0.87 ** 3.86 6.00 2.33 2.00 2.00Male -1.00 -2.39 2.17 1.44 0.92 4.50 8.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
Female -0.26 -1.91 ** 0.53 0.85 * 3.60 5.75 2.60 2.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.19 -1.95 ** 0.83 * 1.53 1.48 *** 3.00 6.13 1.80 2.00 2.00Male -1.10 -3.94 1.80 1.86 1.63 4.50 8.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
Female 0.84 * -1.73 * 0.50 1.41 * 2.25 5.86 2.00 2.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 85
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Art and Design Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Art and Design Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 6 7 5 7 100 43 11 67 40 100 3 1 4 2 3Grades A-B 6 9 7 9 100 71 11 83 40 100 5 1 5 2 3Grades A-C 7 8 100 10 100 86 67 100 40 100 6 6 6 2 3
Grade D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0No Award 1 1 0 0 0 14 33 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 Art and DesignNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 86
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH Art and Design: DesignEntries and Incomplete AwardsIt is not possible to evaluate the level of entries. There were no incomplete awards in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 1 1 1 1 1 1Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 8 10 7 27.0 21.1 28.6 1 1 1Male
Female 10 7 21.1 28.6 1 1
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -1.23 -1.33 1.20 6.00 6.00 3.00Male
Female -1.23 1.23 6.00 3.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates No RV data for this course in 2012
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 87
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Art and Design: Design Progression Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 0 0 0 0 0Grades A-B 0 0 100 0 0 1Grades A-C 100 100 100 1 1 1
Grade D 0 0 0 0 0 0No Award 0 0 0 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher Art and Design: DesignNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 88
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH Art and Design: ExpressiveEntries and Incomplete AwardsIt is not possible to evaluate the level of entries. There were no incomplete awards in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 3 3 3 6 3 4 4 4 7 4Incomplete 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1 0
CohortThere are too few pupils in the RV calculation in 2012 for reliable analysis of the data. All tables for this course that include RV data should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 7 5 6 10 3 29.6 31.0 30.2 23.9 32.6 4 4 4 6 4Male
Female 7 5 6 10 3 30.3 31.0 30.2 23.9 32.6 3 4 4 6 4
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -1.64 ** -0.11 -1.13 0.06 1.32 * 6.00 4.25 5.25 4.83 2.50Male
Female -1.34 * -0.08 -1.07 0.06 1.32 * 5.67 4.25 5.25 4.83 2.50
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates No RV data for this course in 2012
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 89
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Art and Design: Expressive Progression Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 25 0 14 50 0 1 0 1 2Grades A-B 0 25 25 29 100 0 1 1 2 4Grades A-C 75 100 100 71 100 3 4 4 5 4
Grade D 25 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 1 0No Award 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher Art and Design: ExpressiveNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 90
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAH MusicEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In previous years incomplete awards have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 1 6 1 1 1 5 1 4 6 4 7 2 5 8 6Incomplete 1 0 1 0 0 14 0 40 0 0 1 0 2 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2010, 2009, 2008. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 4 2 2 8 5 33.9 35.5 36.0 29.4 32.5 3 2 3 8 6Male 3 10 9 34.7 25.4 27.8 1 3 1
Female 5 3 2 7 5 33.9 35.5 36.6 31.9 33.5 3 2 2 5 5
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.27 -2.12 0.12 0.03 -0.85 3.00 4.50 2.33 3.13 3.83Male -0.53 0.54 -0.56 3.00 3.00 4.00
Female 0.40 -1.98 0.48 -0.20 -0.83 3.00 4.50 2.00 3.20 3.80
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -0.04 0.32 -0.71 -0.37 3.00 2.33 3.25 3.33Male
Female
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 91
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
925 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Music Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Advanced Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Advanced Higher Music Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 6 0 7 8 8 29 0 40 38 17 2 0 2 3 1Grades A-B 5 9 9 7 8 86 50 60 88 67 6 1 3 7 4Grades A-C 8 100 10 100 100 86 100 60 100 100 6 2 3 8 6
Grade D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0No Award 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Advanced Higher MusicNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 92
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH MusicEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In all previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.The level of incomplete awards is above the national pattern, however the pupil numbers involved are small. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 3 4 2 1 2 9 7 10 13 11 11 11 13 16 16Incomplete 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 2
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the second highest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 7 6 9 2 5 28.6 29.6 26.7 32.8 29.9 11 11 13 16 14Male 9 7 10 10 5 24.9 27.5 24.5 24.4 29.1 6 4 6 2 7
Female 2 5 8 2 5 33.1 30.7 28.5 34.1 30.7 5 7 7 14 7
Progression ValueOn average, the grade achieved by All Pupils is not significantly different from that predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All -1.01 ** 0.36 0.94 *** -0.65 0.19 4.82 3.36 2.92 3.56 3.00Male -1.14 * -0.26 1.27 * -1.31 -0.24 5.33 4.25 2.67 5.50 3.43
Female -1.05 0.72 0.62 ** -0.48 0.57 4.20 2.86 3.14 3.29 2.57
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -1.55 *** 0.32 0.69 -0.68 0.09 4.82 3.22 2.64 3.56 3.08Male -1.78 ** 0.03 1.65 ** -2.08 -0.71 5.33 3.67 1.75 5.50 3.67
Female -1.33 0.46 0.09 -0.43 0.78 4.20 3.00 3.14 3.29 2.57
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 93
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Music Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Music Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is well below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In previous years awards at Grades A-C have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 9 6 4 4 4 9 27 54 50 56 1 3 7 8 9Grades A-B 9 3 6 5 6 36 82 77 81 75 4 9 10 13 12Grades A-C 6 100 100 8 9 91 100 100 88 81 10 11 13 14 13
Grade D 2 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0No Award 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 12 6 0 0 0 2 1
Course Comparisons Higher MusicCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 7.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Selkirk High (ScB) 29.8 1.73 10 1.49 *** 11 9 2 11 100 100 0 0 0Comm School Auchterarder (P&K) 30.1 2.55 7 0.65 * 11 8 3 11 100 100 0 0 0Bucksburn Academy (AbC) 29.8 2.69 7 0.52 16 16 1 16 100 100 0 0 0St Joseph's College (D&G) 29.8 2.80 6 0.41 ** 10 4 8 10 100 100 0 0 0St Andrew's & St Bride's (SL) 30.2 2.88 6 0.27 26 7 4 26 100 100 0 0 0Preston Lodge High (EL) 30.1 3.00 5 0.21 14 6 5 13 93 7 0 0 0Lochgilphead High (A&B) 29.9 3.00 5 0.19 16 11 2 13 81 9 2 12 1Balfron High (Sti) 30.0 3.33 4 -0.15 20 7 4 18 90 8 2 10 1Campbeltown Grammar (A&B) 29.8 3.90 3 -0.66 10 6 5 7 70 10 0 0 0Fraserburgh Academy (Abs) 29.8 4.17 2 -0.96 ** 12 5 6 11 92 7 0 0 0Berwickshire High (ScB) 30.1 6.55 1 -3.38 *** 11 5 7 6 55 10 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 94
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 MusicEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is well above the national pattern in the current year. In most previous years entries have been above the national pattern for this course.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In previous years incomplete awards have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 3 9 1 1 2 3 1 5 6 3 4 1 6 8 5Incomplete 2 0 0 1 0 25 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 1 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is above the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2009, 2008. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 5 5 5 4 4 22.5 22.1 22.3 23.8 23.2 3 1 6 7 5Male 9 5 6 7 17.1 23.0 20.8 19.9 1 2 4 1
Female 3 5 5 2 4 25.3 22.1 22.0 27.7 24.0 2 1 4 3 4
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -1.41 -0.24 0.04 -1.30 -0.75 5.67 4.00 3.67 5.00 4.60Male -0.02 1.58 -2.21 -0.80 5.00 2.00 6.25 5.00
Female -2.19 -0.14 -0.72 -0.05 -0.70 6.00 4.00 4.50 3.33 4.50
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All -1.34 -0.24 0.24 -1.01 -0.05 5.67 4.00 3.60 4.83 4.00Male -1.28 5.00
Female
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 95
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Music Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Music Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsThe level of passes is below the national pattern for this course in the current year. In most previous years awards at Grades A-C have been below the national pattern for this course.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 0 0 3 4 4 0 0 50 38 40 0 0 3 3 2Grades A-B 0 100 6 8 8 0 100 67 38 40 0 1 4 3 2Grades A-C 8 100 7 9 8 50 100 83 62 80 2 1 5 5 4
Grade D 1 0 1 0 0 25 0 17 0 0 1 0 1 0 0No Award 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 25 20 0 0 0 2 1
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 MusicNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 96
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighH Physical EducationEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is above the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In all previous years there were no incomplete awards.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 5 2 9 4 4 8 11 5 9 9 10 17 6 11 13Incomplete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is in line with the national pattern for this course. The general attainment of this cohort is the third highest of the 5 years on record. In previous years the overall general attainment of the cohort has shown no regular pattern.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in 2012 and in previous years. The Male and Female rows in the Cohort and Attainment RV tables for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 6 9 4 8 6 27.9 25.5 28.6 26.4 26.8 10 17 6 11 13Male 4 9 5 8 4 28.6 24.8 27.8 26.0 28.0 5 14 5 8 9
Female 7 6 1 7 10 27.3 28.6 33.0 27.7 24.1 5 3 1 3 4
Progression ValueAt the 99% confidence level, on average, All Candidates attained a significantly better band in the current year than is predicted for this course by their attainment in their courses by the end of S4. On average, pupils achieved one band or more better than predicted. The current performance is significantly stronger than that of 2010, 2009, 2008.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
All 0.54 0.10 -0.03 1.05 *** 1.68 *** 4.00 4.94 3.83 3.45 2.92Male 0.74 0.09 -0.32 0.66 * 1.54 *** 3.60 5.00 4.20 3.88 2.89
Female 0.45 0.02 1.19 2.06 * 1.98 ** 4.40 4.67 2.00 2.33 3.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 0.12 0.73 ** -0.19 0.92 ** 1.75 *** 3.71 4.11 3.50 3.40 2.73Male 0.67 0.50 -0.71 0.55 1.51 *** 3.25 4.29 4.00 3.86 2.89
Female -0.61 1.35 1.32 1.74 2.71 4.33 3.50 2.00 2.33 2.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 97
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
920 25 30 35 40 45
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Higher Physical Education Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Higher courses
Lochgilphead High Higher Physical Education Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 3 6 7 6 1 20 6 17 18 62 2 1 1 2 8Grades A-B 4 8 5 1 1 60 29 67 91 85 6 5 4 10 11Grades A-C 100 6 100 100 100 100 88 100 100 100 10 15 6 11 13
Grade D 0 3 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0No Award 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Higher Physical EducationCompared with the ten other schools teaching pupils of similar general attainment, this school is ranked number 1. The mean award achieved by pupils in this school pupils is greater than the school in the middle of the rank order by 1.43.
Ave Band Prog Value Entries Grades A-C IncompletePts Band NCD PV Ast No % NCD No % NCD No % NCD
Lochgilphead High (A&B) 26.8 2.92 10 1.68 *** 13 9 4 13 100 100 0 0 0Hillpark Sec School (Gla) 26.9 3.56 9 1.10 *** 25 10 3 24 96 3 0 0 0Menzieshill High (Dun) 26.9 3.81 9 0.86 *** 16 12 2 16 100 100 0 0 0Trinity High School (SL) 26.8 4.08 8 0.60 * 26 11 3 23 88 6 0 0 0Gordon Schools,The (Abs) 26.8 4.20 7 0.52 10 5 9 10 100 100 0 0 0Holy Rood High (Edi) 26.9 4.35 6 0.32 17 8 6 16 94 4 0 0 0Bell Baxter High (Fif) 26.9 4.36 6 0.28 39 8 5 33 85 7 0 0 0Bannerman High School (Gla) 26.8 4.65 5 0.02 65 19 1 61 94 4 0 0 0Forfar Academy (Ang) 26.7 4.93 4 -0.30 15 6 8 12 80 8 0 0 0Clydebank High (WD) 26.9 5.12 3 -0.45 33 11 3 26 79 8 0 0 0Musselburgh Grammar (EL) 26.8 5.89 1 -1.20 *** 19 6 7 11 58 10 0 0 0The schools in the above table are selected such that the S4 Points Average of the candidates taking this subject is similar. The table is sorted by the average band achieved by candidates taking the course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 98
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighInt2 Physical EducationEntries and Incomplete AwardsThe level of entries is in line with the national pattern in the current year. In previous years entries have shown no regular pattern.There were no incomplete awards in the current year. In previous years incomplete awards have shown no regular pattern.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Entries 9 6 5 4 5 2 3 5 5 4 2 5 6 6 6Incomplete 0 1 0 2 0 0 40 0 17 0 0 2 0 1 0
CohortThe prior attainment by the end of S4 of this cohort is below the national pattern for this course.There are issues about the All cohort in 2009, 2008. Trend and pattern data for this course should be interpreted with caution.There are issues about the Male or Female cohort in previous years. Trend and pattern data for the Male and Female cohorts for this course should be interpreted with caution.
Mean S4 Points NCD Mean S4 Points Number in PV Analysis2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 9 10 3 1 7 20.0 16.6 23.4 25.8 20.0 2 3 6 5 6Male 7 10 4 1 7 20.5 16.6 22.4 25.4 20.0 1 3 3 3 6
Female 9 3 2 19.5 24.3 26.4 1 3 2
Progression ValueThe relationship between attainment in this course, and the predictor used for regression, is not strong. Considerable caution should therefore be exercised in drawing conclusions from the data.
Progression Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1.34 ** 0.99 0.22 0.13 0.90 *** 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.40 2.33Male 1.17 0.95 0.51 -0.12 0.88 *** 2.00 3.00 2.67 2.67 2.33
Female 1.80 0.47 0.56 ** 2.00 3.33 2.00
Progression Value Scatterplot - All Candidates Relative Value Scatterplot - All Candidates
Relative Value
Relative Value Ave Band (Low is better)2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Patt 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
All 1.17 ** 0.61 0.75 ** 0.56 ** 0.93 *** 2.00 2.50 2.60 2.40 2.33Male 1.21 0.60 0.68 * 0.37 0.93 *** 2.00 2.50 2.67 2.67 2.33
Female 1.20 0.86 0.76 ** 2.00 2.50 2.00
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 99
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910 15 20 25 30 35
Awar
d Ba
nd
S4 UPS Points Average
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Physical Education Progression Value 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9123456789
Awar
d Ba
nd
Average Band in other Intermediate 2 courses
Lochgilphead High Intermediate 2 Physical Education Relative Value 2012
Interim S5/S6 Course Report 2012 Lochgilphead HighAttainment - AwardsAll pupils passed in the current year.
NCD Percentage Number2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Grade A 100 7 5 5 2 100 20 33 50 67 2 1 2 3 4Grades A-B 100 8 5 6 100 100 60 83 83 100 2 3 5 5 6Grades A-C 100 10 100 9 100 100 60 100 83 100 2 3 6 5 6
Grade D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0No Award 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Course Comparisons Intermediate 2 Physical EducationNo course comparisons can be made for this course.
©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 100