+ All Categories
Home > Documents > GHGT-12 conference · PDF file2-Enhanced Oil Recovery and Geologic Storage in the Midwestern...

GHGT-12 conference · PDF file2-Enhanced Oil Recovery and Geologic Storage in the Midwestern...

Date post: 13-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: phungdien
View: 215 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
1
www.battelle.org 12 th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Technologies October 6-9, 2014 – Austin, Texas | Neeraj Gupta 1 ([email protected]; Tel: +1 614 424-3820), Darrell Paul 1 , Lydia Cumming 1 , Matt Place 1 , and Robert Mannes 2 1 Battelle, 505 King Ave., Columbus, Ohio 43201; 2 Core Energy LLC, 1011 Noteware Dr., Traverse City, Michigan, 49684, USA Testing for Large-Scale CO 2 -Enhanced Oil Recovery and Geologic Storage in the Midwestern USA The Midwestern Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP, www.mrcsp.org) is improving understanding of potential carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) utilization and storage resources within a nine-state region of the United States that relies heavily on fossil energy. This poster describes two milestones achieved: completion of 10 years of carbon capture and storage (CCS) research and the start of a large-scale injection test in conjunction with CO2- enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Lessons learned from regional characterization and small- scale field tests, as well as the approach that is being followed for the large-scale injection test (including characterization, monitoring, and modeling), are presented. Abstract MRCSP was established in 2003 to assess the technical potential, economic viability, and public acceptability of carbon sequestration within its 9-state region (Fig 1) . Led by Battelle, MRCSP includes nearly 40 organizations from the research community, energy industry, universities, non-government, and government organizations (Fig 2). Geologic and Reservoir Modeling About the MRCSP Site Characterization and Baseline MVA Another lesson learned is the validation of the theoretical potential to sequester all of the regional large point source CO 2 emissions (Fig 5). Geologists from each state continue to support stakeholders by defining and evaluating regional CO 2 storage options. The lack of injectivity observed at the Appalachian Basin test site does not preclude the presence of suitable formation at other locations. Additional characterization efforts include advance wireline logging and testing of brine disposal wells to map potential zones of high permeability (Fig 6). Large-Scale Injection Project Overview Long Term Injection Monitoring Acknowledgements MRCSP is led by Battelle and supported by U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory under Cooperative Agreement no. DE-FC26-0NT42589 with co-funding from several other partners. Core Energy, LLC, and its staff are acknowledged for providing in-kind contributions, and access and field implementation support for the large-scale test. Co-funding for the regional assessment in Ohio is provided by the Ohio Coal Development Office of the Ohio Development Services Agencies. The regional characterization work has been conducted in collaboration with—and with co- funding from—the state geological surveys and universities across nine member states. Fig 1. Coal-fired power generation remains the dominant source of CO 2 emissions in the MRCSP region Fig. 3. Location of the three MRCSP small-scale geologic field tests Fig. 5. Primary targets include Mt. Simon Sandstone (shown here), carbonate layers in deeper basins, and sandy formations in the Coastal Plains and offshore. Fig 2. Members provide cost share and/or in-kind support for research Lessons learned from 10 Years of CCS Conclusions Small-scale tests in multiple geologic settings have helped to develop best practices for site selection, characterization, permitting, outreach, monitoring, and modeling (Fig 3 ). ~60,000 tonnes of CO 2 injected into a dolomitic saline reservoir in Michigan Basin has led to greater emphasis on understanding carbonate storage resources in the region. ~1,000 tonnes of CO 2 injected into the Mount Simon Sandstone in the Cincinnati Arch has confirmed good injectivity in this regionally significant storage resource. Lower than expected injectivity found in the deep saline reservoir zones tested in the Appalachian Basin has demonstrated the importance of continued regional characterization. Informational materials and activities were posted on MRCSP website to facilitate information sharing (Fig 4). Fig. 4. Final reports available on MRCSP website (www.mrcsp.org) Fig. 6. Additional regional characterization efforts through piggyback opportunities are expanding knowledge of reservoirs in the Appalachian Basin. ~1 million tonnes of CO 2 will be injected and monitored in the Northern Niagaran Pinnacle Reef Trend, a reservoir of broad regional importance (Fig 7). The individual fields are part of the Silurian age pinnacle reefs with containment provided by low-permeability carbonate and evaporite zones (Fig 8). Testing is being carried across carbonate oil-bearing reefs in different stages of oil production life cycle: 1 late-stage EOR reef, 6 active EOR reefs, and 1 pre-EOR reef. Activity Before Injection Early Injection Mid Injection Late Injection After Injection CO 2 flow X X X Pressure and temperature X X X X X Wireline logging X X X Borehole gravity X X Fluid sampling X X X VSP X X Microseismic X Maybe InSAR X X X X X Monitoring includes metering of the CO 2 injection volume, recycle of CO 2 gas produced with oil, and new compressed CO 2 from the natural gas processing plant (Fig 9). The injection vs pressure relationship in the late-stage reef shows the effect of phase changes in the system from initial subcritical phase through supercritical phase. As the closed reef structure fills up, the rate of increase in pressure is growing (Fig 10). Two geologic interpretations based on lithostratigraphic and sequence stratigraphic approaches are being explored (Fig 11). The models have been imported into the black-oil simulator, CMG-IMEX®. History-matching was successful; however, the simulator appears to under-predict the reservoir pressure observed during current CO 2 injection. The next step is to transition from a black oil model to a compositional model that can effectively handle multicomponent reservoir fluid interactions Workflow includes: assessment of preexisting wireline and 3D seismic data and development of reservoir models; additional site characterization and baseline monitoring to improve understanding; model performance calibration to historical data; and validation and comparison of models with field observations (Table 1). Table 1. Monitoring plan for the late-stage reef Fig. 7. Location of the large-scale injection site Fig. 8. Generalized lithostratigraphic column Fig. 9. Diagram of closed-loop CO 2 -EOR cycle and monitoring points Fig. 10. Composite plot of adjusted BHP and cumulative CO2 injection Fig. 11. Geologic modeling results for the late-stage reef Lithostratigraphic Sequence stratigraphic Field demonstrations and regional mapping are developing practical knowledge and increasing capabilities for CCS deployment. MRCSP recently completed 10 years of CCS research. Lessons learned from three small-scale tests and collaborative regional mapping indicate that the region has the CO 2 storage potential required for its numerous large point sources The large-scale injection test in conjunction with CO 2 -EOR is underway. The late stage EOR reef is serving as the main test reef to increase capabilities in characterization, monitoring, and modeling technologies
Transcript
Page 1: GHGT-12 conference · PDF file2-Enhanced Oil Recovery and Geologic Storage in the Midwestern USA ... simulator, CMG-IMEX®. ... the simulator appears to under-predict the

www.battelle.org 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Technologies October 6-9, 2014 – Austin, Texas|

Neeraj Gupta1 ([email protected]; Tel: +1 614 424-3820), Darrell Paul1, Lydia Cumming1, Matt Place1, and Robert Mannes21Battelle, 505 King Ave., Columbus, Ohio 43201; 2Core Energy LLC, 1011 Noteware Dr., Traverse City, Michigan, 49684, USA

Testing for Large-Scale CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery and Geologic Storage in the Midwestern USA

The Midwestern Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP, www.mrcsp.org) is improving understanding of potential carbon dioxide (CO2) utilization and storage resources within a nine-state region of the United States that relies heavily on fossil energy. This poster describes two milestones achieved: completion of 10 years of carbon capture and storage (CCS) research and the start of a large-scale injection test in conjunction with CO2-enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Lessons learned from regional characterization and small-scale field tests, as well as the approach that is being followed for the large-scale injection test (including characterization, monitoring, and modeling), are presented.

Abstract

• MRCSP was established in 2003 to assess the technical potential, economic viability, and public acceptability of carbon sequestration within its 9-state region (Fig 1) .

• Led by Battelle, MRCSP includes nearly 40 organizations from the research community, energy industry, universities, non-government, and government organizations (Fig 2).

Geologic and Reservoir Modeling

About the MRCSP

Site Characterization and Baseline MVA

• Another lesson learned is the validation of the theoretical potential to sequester all of the regional large point source CO2 emissions (Fig 5). Geologists from each state continue to support stakeholders by defining and evaluating regional CO2 storage options.

• The lack of injectivity observed at the Appalachian Basin test site does not preclude the presence of suitable formation at other locations. Additional characterization efforts include advance wireline logging and testing of brine disposal wells to map potential zones of high permeability (Fig 6).

Large-Scale Injection Project Overview

Long Term Injection Monitoring

Acknowledgements MRCSP is led by Battelle and supported by U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory under Cooperative Agreement no. DE-FC26-0NT42589 with co-funding from several other partners. Core Energy, LLC, and its staff are acknowledged for providing in-kind contributions, and access and field implementation support for the large-scale test. Co-funding for the regional assessment in Ohio is provided by the Ohio Coal Development Office of the Ohio Development Services Agencies. The regional characterization work has been conducted in collaboration with—and with co-funding from—the state geological surveys and universities across nine member states.

Fig 1. Coal-fired power generation remains the dominant source of CO2 emissions in the MRCSP region

Fig. 3. Location of the three MRCSP small-scale geologic field tests

Fig. 5. Primary targets include Mt. Simon Sandstone (shown here), carbonate layers in deeper basins, and sandy formations in the Coastal Plains and offshore.

Fig 2. Members provide cost share and/or in-kind support for research

Lessons learned from 10 Years of CCS

Conclusions• Small-scale tests in multiple geologic settings

have helped to develop best practices for site selection, characterization, permitting, outreach, monitoring, and modeling (Fig 3 ).

• ~60,000 tonnes of CO2 injected into a dolomitic saline reservoir in Michigan Basin has led to greater emphasis on understanding carbonate storage resources in the region.

• ~1,000 tonnes of CO2 injected into the Mount Simon Sandstone in the Cincinnati Arch has confirmed good injectivity in this regionally significant storage resource.

• Lower than expected injectivity found in the deep saline reservoir zones tested in the Appalachian Basin has demonstrated the importance of continued regional characterization.

• Informational materials and activities were posted on MRCSP website to facilitate information sharing (Fig 4). Fig. 4. Final reports available on MRCSP website

(www.mrcsp.org)

Fig. 6. Additional regional characterization efforts through piggyback opportunities are expanding knowledge of reservoirs in the Appalachian Basin.

• ~1 million tonnes of CO2 will be injected and monitored in the Northern NiagaranPinnacle Reef Trend, a reservoir of broad regional importance (Fig 7).

• The individual fields are part of the Silurian age pinnacle reefs with containment provided by low-permeability carbonate and evaporite zones (Fig 8).

• Testing is being carried across carbonate oil-bearing reefs in different stages of oil production life cycle: 1 late-stage EOR reef, 6 active EOR reefs, and 1 pre-EOR reef.

ActivityBefore

InjectionEarly

InjectionMid

InjectionLate

InjectionAfter

InjectionCO2 flow X X XPressure and temperature X X X X X

Wireline logging X X X

Borehole gravity X X

Fluid sampling X X X

VSP X X

Microseismic X Maybe

InSAR X X X X X

• Monitoring includes metering of the CO2 injection volume, recycle of CO2 gas produced with oil, and new compressed CO2 from the natural gas processing plant (Fig 9).

• The injection vs pressure relationship in the late-stage reef shows the effect of phase changes in the system from initial subcritical phase through supercritical phase. As the closed reef structure fills up, the rate of increase in pressure is growing (Fig 10).

• Two geologic interpretations based on lithostratigraphic and sequence stratigraphic approaches are being explored (Fig 11).

• The models have been imported into the black-oil simulator, CMG-IMEX®. History-matching was successful; however, the simulator appears to under-predict the reservoir pressure observed during current CO2 injection.

• The next step is to transition from a black oil model to a compositional model that can effectively handle multicomponent reservoir fluid interactions

Workflow includes:• assessment of preexisting

wireline and 3D seismic data and development of reservoir models;

• additional site characterization and baseline monitoring to improve understanding;

• model performance calibration to historical data; and

• validation and comparison of models with field observations (Table 1).

Table 1. Monitoring plan for the late-stage reef

Fig. 7. Location of the large-scale injection site

Fig. 8. Generalized lithostratigraphic column

Fig. 9. Diagram of closed-loop CO2-EOR cycle and monitoring points

Fig. 10. Composite plot of adjusted BHP and cumulative CO2 injection

Fig. 11. Geologic modeling results for the late-stage reef

Lithostratigraphic

Sequence stratigraphic

• Field demonstrations and regional mapping are developing practical knowledge and increasing capabilities for CCS deployment.

• MRCSP recently completed 10 years of CCS research. Lessons learned from three small-scale tests and collaborative regional mapping indicate that the region has the CO2storage potential required for its numerous large point sources

• The large-scale injection test in conjunction with CO2-EOR is underway. The late stage EOR reef is serving as the main test reef to increase capabilities in characterization, monitoring, and modeling technologies

Recommended