+ All Categories
Home > Documents > “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

“Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

Date post: 19-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
“Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study
Transcript
Page 1: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

“Gilbane Gold”“Gilbane Gold”

PHIL/ENGR 482

ETHICS & ENGINEERING

Gilbane Gold Case Study

Page 2: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

Taxonomy of Obligations

To whom does an engineer have obligations?To self?To others?

Family and friends Employer and fellow employees Fellow professionals Clients/Consumers/3rd Parties Public; including future generations

To the environment?

Page 3: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

Gilbane Gold Background

Page 4: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

Allowable Lead and Arsenic Concentration in Wastewater

A person working a regular 40-h work week whois able to sort 1 ping-pong ball per second wouldtake 139 years to sort through a billion balls.

Note:

Page 5: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

Assumptions:

250,000 gal/day wastewater before expansion Old test methods indicated 5 ppb lead, ok. New test indicates 7.5+ ppb lead Legal limit is 7.5 ppb lead

Planned expansion will cause 500% increase in wastewater (and lead) volume

Page 6: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

Impact of proposed expansion...

Wastewater Current: 250,000 gal/day Future: 1,250,000 gal/day

Lead Current: 250,000 g/day @ 7.5 ppb = 5.7 lb/day Future: 1,250,000 g/day @ 7.5 ppb = 28.5 lb/day

Page 7: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

A problem…?

When trying a new and more accurate test method, we discover that the plant is discharging wastewater concentrations at or above the legal limit of 7.5 ppb lead…

Regulations do not require the new test method be used...

0.25 MgpdWastewater

@7.5ppb lead

7.5 ppb Wastewater treatment plant

Sludge + treated effluent

Page 8: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

A bigger problem…?

A proposed production increase will increase the amount of wastewater 500%...1.25 Mgpd

[email protected] lead

7.5 ppb Wastewater treatment plant

Sludge + treated effluent

Page 9: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

A potential solution?“The solution to polution is dilution…”

It is proposed to dilute effluent to achieve an acceptable concentration, say 5.75 ppb...1.25 Mgpd

[email protected] lead

6 ppb Wastewater treatment plant

Sludge + treated effluent

0.4 MgpdClean H2O

Page 10: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

Annual cost of 0.4 Mgpd water...

Fresh water purchase (@ $0.25/1,000 gal) = $35,000

Incremental sewage charges (@ $0.75/1,000 gal) = $105,000

Total annual cost = $140,000

Page 11: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

Potential solution 2?Ion Exchange

Page 12: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

Potential solution 3?Artificial Wetland

Page 13: “Gilbane Gold” PHIL/ENGR 482 ETHICS & ENGINEERING Gilbane Gold Case Study.

Summary of three possible solutions

Method Est. Annual Cost

Dilution $140,000

Ion exchange $270,000

Artificial wetland $150,000


Recommended