+ All Categories
Home > Education > Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The...

Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The...

Date post: 23-Jun-2015
Category:
Upload: vyron
View: 740 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
24
A step towards the improvement of A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications geo-applications The case of OpenStreetMap The case of OpenStreetMap Vyron Antoniou, Muki Haklay, Jeremy Morley Vyron Antoniou, Muki Haklay, Jeremy Morley Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering
Transcript
Page 1: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

A step towards the improvement of spatial A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applicationsdata quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications

The case of OpenStreetMapThe case of OpenStreetMap

Vyron Antoniou, Muki Haklay, Jeremy MorleyVyron Antoniou, Muki Haklay, Jeremy MorleyDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering

Page 2: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

A fundamental GIS problemA fundamental GIS problem

Information SystemInformation SystemReal WorldReal World

http://www.bing.com/maps Google Earth

Page 3: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap
Page 4: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

OSM Map FeaturesOSM Map Features

Page 5: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

WikiWiki DemocracyDemocracy++

Page 6: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

OSM DataOSM Data

Geometry

Attributes (Tags)

+

Page 7: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

OSM’s GeometryOSM’s Geometry

Haklay et al.Haklay et al. Antoniou et al.Antoniou et al.

CompletenessCompleteness Positional AccuracyPositional Accuracy

Page 8: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Tags?Tags?

Page 9: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap
Page 10: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Unique Tags vs Total Tags for each OSM Feature Unique Tags vs Total Tags for each OSM Feature Category (GB)Category (GB)

Sum: 2.25M tags

Page 11: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

How many tags do we have for each entity?How many tags do we have for each entity?

Page 12: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Residential (2826)

Primary (623)

How often there is a new Tag introduced?How often there is a new Tag introduced?

Page 13: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

How often there is a new Tag introduced?How often there is a new Tag introduced?

Page 14: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Unique Tags vs Popular Tags (95% of population)Unique Tags vs Popular Tags (95% of population)

Page 15: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

From OSM wiki-pages to XML SchemaFrom OSM wiki-pages to XML Schema

XML SchemaXML Schema

==

OSM OSM SpecificationSpecification

Page 16: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

From OSM wiki-pages to XML SchemaFrom OSM wiki-pages to XML Schema

Page 17: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Data Quality changes whenever there is a change in:Data Quality changes whenever there is a change in:

• The data (e.g. due to a transformation)

• The ground truth

• The specifications of the product

Page 18: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Data Quality changes whenever there is a change in:Data Quality changes whenever there is a change in:

• The data (e.g. due to a transformation)

• The ground truth

• The specifications of the product

Page 19: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

MerkaartorMerkaartor

PotlatchPotlatch

JOSMJOSM

Freedom, Formalization and Quality Standards?Freedom, Formalization and Quality Standards?

Page 20: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Freedom, Formalization and Quality Standards?Freedom, Formalization and Quality Standards?

Page 21: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap
Page 22: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap
Page 23: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Final PointsFinal Points

•Tags can greatly affect the quality of a VGI Map. •The loose structure of Feature extraction and attribution introduces errors.

• Errors are proportional to the tags’ population.

• The uncontrolled voting system deteriorates the overall quality of the OSM data.

• Errors or discrepancies in Features’ Tags can spread around.

• Formalization can be achieved under the hood.

Page 24: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

ThankThank youyou


Recommended