+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1...

Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1...

Date post: 28-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
Economic transformation of the Konin Subregion − the direction of hydrogen Economic transformation of the Konin Subregion − the direction of hydrogen December 12, 2018 – Konin (Poland) December 12, 2018 – Konin (Poland) A bridge to a hydrogen society A bridge to a hydrogen society Giuseppe Spazzafumo Giuseppe Spazzafumo International Association for Hydrogen Energy Hydrogen Energy Systems Division University of Cassino and Southern Lazio Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
Transcript
Page 1: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

Economic transformation of the Konin Subregion − the direction of hydrogenEconomic transformation of the Konin Subregion − the direction of hydrogenDecember 12, 2018 – Konin (Poland)December 12, 2018 – Konin (Poland)

A bridge to a hydrogen societyA bridge to a hydrogen societyGiuseppe SpazzafumoGiuseppe Spazzafumo

International Association for Hydrogen Energy

Hydrogen Energy Systems Division

University of Cassino and Southern Lazio

Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering

Page 2: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

PreamblePreamble

The aim of this meeting would be to outline a future for a region that should abandon its mining activity with a view to decarbonising the society.

But one week ago President Duda said that:

‟Using your own natural resources - in Poland's case, coal - in order to be able to ensure energy security is not in opposition to climate protection and progress in climate protection”.

I agree

In the near future, decarbonisation and coal mining are not in conflict. Not for your Region.

Unless you want to use nuclear energy, renewables energy sources are the core of decarbonisation process and hydrogen is the unique non-carbon fuel. However decarbonisation is a gradual process and eliminating coal could not be the best initial step.

Page 3: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

Electric power generation is dominated by lignite which is a regional source. However generation from renewable energy sources are increasing, especially from wind and biomass.

Another important sector is residential heating, which is mainly district heating based on lignite and natural gas (not a regional source).

Finally, the transportation sector is mainly based on fuels which are not regional sources and which cover a significant share of the primary energy consumption.

I will focus my attention to hydrogen from wind, which seems the most promising.

Current energy situation in the RegionCurrent energy situation in the Region

53%

26%

16%

5%

Primary energy consumption (Poland, 2015)

Coal Oil Natural gas Renewables

73%

8%

4%1%

14%0%0%

Electric power generation (Wielkopolska, 2015)

Lignite Coal + Biomass Biomass Biogas

Wind Hydro Sun

Page 4: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

Replacing fossil fuels with renewable electric power and renewable hydrogen will require some decades. Until they will not cover the most of energy needs, the choice of how to use the available renewable hydrogen is fundamental.

The hydrogen roadmaps proposed up to now are not really roadmaps for a fast development of a hydrogen society. They are rather roadmaps for the development of a society based on fuel cells. This is important, of course, since hydrogen and fuel cells are basic in our future energy systems. However these roadmaps are long term roadmaps which aim to a large replacement of fossil fuels only by 2050. This is because great investments are required for hydrogen production, distribution, storage and final use in fuel cells.

Hydrogen + Fuel cellsHydrogen + Fuel cells

Centralised hydrogen production + decentralised hydrogen use

Decentralised hydrogen production + decentralised hydrogen use

Transportation of hydrogenHigh cost of fuel cells

Lower production efficiencyHigher production costHigh cost of fuel cells

Long term decarbonisation

Page 5: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

Concentrating infrastructure investments on hydrogen production will speed up the decarbonisation of our society. Obviously we need also to continue to invest on research in the other technologies since this will probably allow to find solution to some issues still not solved.

The political decisions on which road to take should be taken on the basis of a Life Cycle Assessment extended to the entire system in order to guarantee the population the least impact on health. LCA should be the watershed between technologies to invest industrially and technologies to be funded at the research level.However economic evaluations are also important because a less expensive decarbonisation option could allow faster results.

How to speed up decarbonisationHow to speed up decarbonisation

Centralised hydrogen production + centralised hydrogen use

Centralised hydrogen production + synthetic fuels production

Cost for plant reconversionNo need for hydrogen transportation

Utilisation with turbomachinery

Reduction of efficiencyCost of chemical reactors

Current trasportation infrastructure

Faster decarbonisation

Page 6: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

Waiting for a full electric & hydrogen society, we have to decide which is the best use of renewable hydrogen.

From an environmental point of view the most critical sectors is transport, and eventually residential heating when not a district heating: - emissions are generated especially in areas with a high population density; - clean up of the exhaust gas is more difficult.

Replacing gasoline and diesel with hydrogen inside the vehicles engines would be the ideal solution, but it is far away due to distribution problems and cost of vehicles. Moreover the environmental impact of the construction of a PEMFC is still high.

On the other hand, replacing fossil fuels with hydrogen to generate power and heat is easier and more efficient, but maybe not the best solution from an environmental point of view, since carbon dioxide is not the unique harmful emission.

Finally, it is important to consider that in Konin Region power is mainly generated using a local primary resource and continuing to use such a resource in existing plants could make available money to be invested in hydrogen production.

Hydrogen use: transport vs powerHydrogen use: transport vs power

Page 7: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

Maybe the most efficient way to convert hydrogen continuing to use coal is the so called "attached" cycle, that is ia a cycle in which hydrogen and oxygen are used inside a traditional steam system to improve its performance.Being that hydrogen is used only in the hottest region of the Hirn cycle, its conversion (marginal efficiency) is very high: can easily reach 55% on HHV with a maximum temperature of 800 °C, but the temperature can be raised up to 1500 °C.However this technology is not yet available: direct steam generators are at a laboratory level.

A future efficient use of hydrogenA future efficient use of hydrogen

5

6

4

7

15 2 3

14

1

10

8 12

9 11

13

4 5

6

7

H 2 8

15 2 3

14

1

10

9

12

13

11

O 2 8’

coal

hydrogen

H2 conversion

efficiency 55%

coal

650 °C 800 °C

Page 8: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

BiomassBiomass PressurePressure

TimeTime

TemperatureTemperature

Fossil fuelsFossil fuels

BiomassBiomass PressurePressure

HydrogenHydrogen

TemperatureTemperatureSubstitute ofSubstitute ofNatural GasNatural Gas

C x H y O z+(2 x−y2+ z+ϵ)H2⇒ x CH4+ϵH2+ z H 2 O

O2

Hydrogen vs timeHydrogen vs time

Page 9: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

Power to fuelPower to fuel

Although also coal can react with hydrogen to give a substitute of natural gas or gasoline or diesel fuel, coal hydrogasification and following treatment are not suggested unless there is the need to replace an obsolete coal plant.

Using biomass to produce a synthetic fuel is a good option, but currently there is a better source of carbon: carbon dioxide at high concentration into the gas leaving the chimneys of coal fired plants.

Such synthetic fuels, gaseous or liquid, are completely suitable to be distributed without changing the existing infrastructure and to be used in existing internal combustion engines: therefore, they could replace the imported fuels, with economic and environmental advantages.

The final carbon dioxide emissions are not avoided, but they are recycled, similarly to those absorbed by biomass, and do not contribute to new carbon dioxide emissions.

The same could be done with the carbon dioxide leaving the chimney of large biomass powerplants.

BiomassBiomass

WaterWater

ExhaustExhaustCoalCoal

PowerplantPowerplant

HydrogenHydrogen

SynthesisSynthesis SyntheticSyntheticfuelfuel

NN22, H, H22O, ...O, ...

Page 10: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

Carbon dioxide separationCarbon dioxide separation

Obviously current powerplants, or district heating plants, discharge into the atmosphere a gas containing not only carbon dioxide, but also water, nitrogen and other minor substances, whereas sulphur should be already removed.

Therefore separation of carbon dioxide from nitrogen could be a problem. Luckily electrolytic hydrogen comes together with oxygen. So that air for coal (or biomass) combustion can be replaced with pure oxygen, with the result of small amount of nitrogen in the exhaust gases from the chimney.

However this involves another problem: the significantly smaller flow of gas supplied to the heat exchangers of the plant. Such a problem could be solved by recycling a proper flow of exhaust gas.

In this way the gas recovered from the chimney is composed almost only by carbon dioxide and water vapour, which can be easily condensed and separated.

BiomassBiomass

WaterWaterOxygenOxygen

ExhaustExhaust

CoalCoal

PowerplantPowerplant

HydrogenHydrogen

SynthesisSynthesis SyntheticSyntheticfuelfuel

Page 11: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

FEED SR1 SR2 SR3 SNG0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

CO2 CO

CH4 H2O

O2 N2

H2 Temperature C

Ga

s co

mp

osi

tion

[mo

l/s]

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C

]

Total flow increase due to recycle

H2+CO2 > 99%

Carbon oxides more than halved

Carbon oxides <5%

H2+CH4 > 99.75%

An example of composition changesAn example of composition changes

Methanation of carbon dioxide (Sabatier process) with three reactors.

Page 12: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

Using hydrogen to produce a synthetic fuel is a solution at hand. It allows to eliminate carbon dioxide emissions without eliminating existing coal and biomass fired plants.

The distribution and the end use would have practically no additional costs.

If well coordinated, the best choice is the production of substitute of natural gas (SNG). This involve also the conversion of the existing gasoline and diesel vehicles to natural gas vehicles and, obviously, this will represent an additional end use cost. However, it could be made gradually when increasing the availability of SNG. This also allows to reduce harmful emissions inside the cities which involve lower health care costs.

So, my suggestion for a fast, although partial, decarbonisation of Konin Region are:

- concentrate your industrial investments in increasing renewable energy systems and in building power to fuel systems,

and at the same time:

- continue to invest in research on other hydrogen technologies (production, storage, distribution and fuel cells),

in order to be ready, when such technologies will be economically and environmentally mature, to move from the bridge to the full hydrogen society.

ConclusionsConclusions

Page 13: Giuseppe Spazzafumo - European Commission · 3 2 15 14 1 10 8 12 9 11 13 5 4 6 7 H2 8 3 2 15 14 1 10 9 12 13 11 O2 8’ coal hydrogen H 2 conversion efficiency 55% coal 650 °C 800

ThanksThanks

Thank you for your kind attention ….


Recommended