of 28
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
1/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations:Solutions, experiences
GL Your competitive edge
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
2/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
Quality Management
Reliable Service
> Use Standards> Apply Methods
Implement Methods
Competitive Rates
> Reduce OpEx> Maintain competitiveness
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
3/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
Annual costs per t rade*
Bunker costs: a central factor in defining competitiveness
687n mo
41 (6%)
Ship operations**
582
(85%)
437
41 (9%)
Driven by design andoperations
Strong variances betweencomparable ships
Bunker costs332
(76%)
Capital costs
800 USD/ton
64 (9%)
450 USD/ton
64(15%)
Bunker price
* Far East-Europe, 9,000 TEU, at 25 kn** -
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
, , , ,
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
4/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
Bunker 380 cst, RotterdamYearly Average prices, per metric ton
ue r ces
600
700
380cst bunker prices, Rotterdam
e
300
400$
perTonn
100
200
81
83
67
84
96
106
96
68
93
138
117
134
153
155
234
293
345
472
354
450
580
0
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011-
02
Source: Clarksons Research, February 2011
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
5/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
Annual costs per trade* (at 450 USD/ton)
Slow steaming: an interim reaction an permanent solution?
in mio USD
37741 (9%)
437
Ship operations**
Positive effect onbunker cost partlycompensated by need
for more ships in trade332222
57 (15%)
Bunker costs o ays s ps o en no
designed and equip-ped for slow speeds
(59%)
25 kn
Capital costs
22 kn
64 (15%)
Vessels Speed
* Far East-Europe, 9,000 TEU** -
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
, , , ,
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
6/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
7/28
4.400 TEU Container Vessels Fuel Efficiency
600
800
$/Tonne
40.000
50.000
sin$/day
Development/Forecast of Bunker price & Container vessel Timecharter rate
Heavy Fuel Oil BunkerLeft hand scale
0
200
400
BunkerC
ostsi
0
10.000
20.000
.
TimecharterRat price (Rotterdam, 380 cst)
Time Charter rate 4.400
TEU container vesselRight hand scale
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
2002 2010 2018
Fuel costs* 17.500 40.500 60.000
Forecast
Ratio fuel costs / charter rate 0,75 2,0 2,7
Efficiency improvement** 10% 10% 10%
1 yr charter rate $/day 23.125 20.000 22.000
Yearly total savings*** [in US$] 1.200.000 1.800.000500.000
Daily savings in % of charter rate 20% 27%7,5%
Daily total savings*** [in US$] 4.000 6.0001.750
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
GL; December 2010
* Assumptions for bunker consumption, vessel speed and sailing days per year: 130 tonnes per day/24 knots/300 days (2002), 88 tonnes per day/21 knots/300 days (2010), 88 tonnes per day/21 knots/300 days (2018).
** Estimated reduction of HFO Bunker consumption, based on GL efficiency products/services.
*** Savings due to a decrease of yearly fuel costs.
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
8/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
1.600 50.000
Worldwide Fleet development [mGT]
1.200
1.40040.000
million GT [left hand scale] Number of vessels [right hand scale]
2,1% * 2,0% *
600
800
.
20.000
30.000Million
GT
No. ofvessels
6,1% *
725,2
776,1
833,6
860
917
974
1.0
14
1.0
48
1.0
54
1.0
61
1.0
82
1.1
11
1.1
33
1.1
51
1.1
72
0
200
400
0
10.000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
YearsSource: Clarksons Research, March 2010
(Vessel > 2.000 GT) * = average yearly growth based on GT
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
9/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
CO2 Emission Development
1200 Discussed
1000
2
Emission target
- 40 %
600
llion
tonnesC
- 20%-20% of 2005till 2020
200
400mi
0
2005 2020
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
10/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
* *
capacity * speedEEDI =
Strong effect
and improvement opportunities
Reduce installed power through better design and / or reduced speed
Weaker effect.
> Use fuels with lower emission factor
> Increase capacity
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
,
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
11/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
(MEPC 60/4/36, submitted by Japan)
The required EEDI is defined by a reduction relative to the baseline.
MEPC 60/4/36 suggests an initial reduction of 10% for all ship types, based on an assessment of application ofpossible technologies.
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
12/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
Key success factors:
Design will be a key lever and future ships
Design optimisation
efficient and thus competitive than those
designed in the past and sailing today.Comprehensive/holistic solutions arerequired to achieve significant improvements
Efficiency
An additional cost-reduction potential of 5 -15% can be generated through FutureShip'soperations oriented tools focusing on fuelefficiency without impacting the operationalpro e o a vesse
In an increasingly competitive industry,minimizing bunker costs will be a keysuccess factor. Slow steaming has been a
first step but will not be sufficient movingforward
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
13/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
ppor un es or nergy av ngsPlanning phase
Construction phase
Added investment% of new buildinginvestment
Savings example% of fuel cost
0.53.0
5.0
-0.5
Service phase
107
5
Hull
0.5
1.5
2.0
-0.5
and cannot be added
Savings depend on
original design andoperational environ-4
5
5Appendages
1.5
2.5
3.0
-0.5 ment
Particularly highpotential after changeof operations (e.g. after
5
5
5
Marineengineering
0.2
1.0
.
10
6
,
Plus monitoring
Plus controlled hull andengine maintenance
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
14/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
15/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
"ECO Solutions / Schulte, 9.000 TEU vessel
Clients starting point Our service Results
Shipping companies BernhardSchulte and Costamare orderedcontainer vessels at a Chineseshipyard
Based on the existing design hull lineconstraints were agreed with designoffice
Hull lines and propulsion
Total resistance could be reduced bymore than 10%
Hereby owners attained thepossibility to reduce main engines
e orgna es gn o e u neswas performed by a major Chineseship designer
In order to increase the vesselscompetitiveness owners decided to
arrangement were optmse ymeans of CFD analysis
Towing tank tests were performed atHSVA in order to verify thecalculated results and to establish a
MCR which leads to
- Daily fuel oil savings of app. 30tons
- Lube oil savings of about 30 tonsper year
optimisation process aiming onminimization of wave resistance andimproved arrangement of propellerand rudder
design
The optimisation will pay within aperiod shorter than one month
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
16/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
"ECO Solutions / Schulte, 9.000 TEU vessel
ca. 200 t Fuel/Day x 365 Days = 73.000 t Fuel/Year
Bunker Cost (in MioUS$) Optimization Optimiazation =. ,
2007: 73.000 t x 492 US$/t = 35,92
2011: 73.000 t x 590 US$/t = 43,01
Over life of ship @ 25 years = 1.077.000
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
17/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solutions and Experiences
Reference Case
Lpp = 288m, Speed: 22,2kn, Installed Power: 54.180kW
"ECO Solutions / Schulte, 9.000 TEU vessel
Yearly Fuel Consumption/Yearly Fuel Costs
45,000
50,00055,000Pd [kW]
38.528 to
19,3 M
47.286 to23,6 M
-19%
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
not optimized
optimized
OptimizedNot Optimized,
18 19 20 21 22 23
pee n
Tank Test RsultsTank Test Rsults
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
Base Line Modell Post Modell
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
18/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
"ECO Solutions / Schulte, 9.000 TEU vessel
ca. 200 t Fuel/Day x 365 Days = 73.000 t Fuel/Year
Bunker Cost (in MioUS$) Optimization Optimiazation =. , . .
2007: 73.000 t x 492 US$/t = 35,92 29.19 5.37
2011: 73.000 t x 590 US$/t = 43,01 34.84 6.17
Over life of ship @ 25 years = 1.077.000 872.37 204.63
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
19/28
Reference Case:
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solutions and Experiences
Power measurement data (similar draft, trim, weather) Trim at normal operations
ECO-Assistant optimized trim
Nominal propeller-curve
-
Engine power could be reduced48.0
-3%
46.5
This translates
into fuel saving equals 270t HFO
Fuel saving of 3% verif ied by shaft
Test conditionsRPM @ speed: 82 (~78%) @ ~15 kn
Data: In test (blue 2010-05-26,16-24h), after test phase (red 2010-05-28, 14-22h)
,
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
20/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
Trim Adjustment using GLs ECO-AssistantFleet of 3 hull-sister container ships 2850 TEU
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
21/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
Reference Case:Trim Adjustment at Bulk carrier using GLs ECO-Assistant
SAVINGS OVER 5 MONTHS: 81t @ 650$/t or 52600S$
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
22/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
Trim Adjustment at Bulk carrier using GLs ECO-Assistant
SAVINGS OVER 5 MONTHS: 62t @ 650$/t or 40300.00$
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
23/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
Trim Adjustment at Bulk carrier using GLs ECO-Assistant
SAVINGS OVER 5 MONTHS: 140t @ 650$/t = 93000.00US$
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
24/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
If you are:
e ques on .... a s n or me ere
OWNER your ship consumes less fuelyou have a competitive advantage
CHARTERER
.
You pay less for fuel,
A competitive advantage
OPERATOR Competitive advantage,Owners prefer operators runningshi s more effectivel
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
25/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
....Re-engine your ship with dual Fuel: HFO and LNG
THE GL Classed chemical Tanker BIT VIKING
Particulars
DWT 24783MT
.
B 26.30m
Cubic capacity 27310cu.m 98%
Main Engines 2x WAERTSILA 6L46B 5850kWClassed GL +100A5 E3 ESP IW NAW OC Chemical Tanker Type 2 GF
GL Register 111552
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
26/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
Have you thought about LNG?
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
27/28
Energy saving in Ship Operations: Solut ions and Experiences
o,What do next?
Easy.... Lets talk! Call us! ,
We have solutions for you!
Proven, solid and real
o more c c en or egg quest onsLets make chicken-omelettes
(J ohn Hartle , Waertsila Americas)
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November
7/30/2019 GL - Energy Savings in Ship Operations - Solutions, Experiences (2011)
28/28
For more Information andinquiries please contact
Harry Vordokas
Bus. Development Manager,,Re ion Americas
GERMANISCHER LLOYD
303 S. Broadway, Ste 460
Tarrytown, NY 10561, USA
T: +1.914.3666606
C: +1.786.5430516
a :
MarineMoney, New York | 2011 November