Global Activities 2016 - International Organization for ... · Nigeria Iraq Nepal Whole of Syria...

Global Activities 2016Shelter/NFI WASH Cash Coordination CCCM DTMMay 2017

*This value is based on IOM operations reported by the missions. It also includes beneficiaries from other divisions due to the cross-sectoral nature of some activities and/or projects. Values include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.

Throughout 2016, IOM operations assisted 26.2 million beneficiaries globally*.

The information captured in this document was consolidated from a data collection exercise, carried out in January 2017 and is wholly based on the responses obtained from each mission. A total of 88 country offices were contacted to complete a survey covering activities in shelter, water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), Cash-Based Interventions (CBI), Camp Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) operations and capacity building, sectoral coordination, and DTM. From those contacted, responses were received from 77 missions. The results presented here cover activities related to preparedness and response which started, were underway, or ended in 2016.

It is important to note that beneficiary numbers for each thematic area cannot be summed up since beneficiaries may have benefitted from more than one type of project.

All maps included in this document are for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. All information is the best available at the time when the map was produced.

May 2017

Preparedness and response activities in 2016

Photo credits: Muse Mohammed/IOM (cover page) and Eunjin Jeong/IOM 2015.Icons were taken from the Noun Project: Dilayorganci, L. Delgalo, M. Kulikov, T. Knopp, A. Rodriguez, Y. Luck, L. Prado, T. Helbig, A. Ahmed, C. Gomboli, DTE Media.

Global Highlights 2016

Global Highlights 2016 Global Highlights 2016 1

NFI

14,600 34,400

27,000935,000

62,200

39,000

Total family tents set upHouseholds assisted with cash transfers**

Shelter repairs and upgrades

Households reached with non-food items

Newly built shelters

Individuals who receivedshelter trainings

* Individual beneficiaries are estimated based on average household size by country

Philippines

Vanuatu

BangladeshThailand

Sri Lanka

Myanmar

Papua New Guinea

Micronesia (FSM)

MarshallIslands (RMI)

Zimbabwe

Central African Republic

Democratic Republicof the Congo

EthiopiaSomalia

Yemen

Kenya

BurundiRwanda

Chad

Peru

South SudanNigeriaCameroon

MauritaniaDominica

Iraq

SyriaJordan

LebanonHaitiHaiti PakistanNepal

Afghanistan

Fiji

Ecuador

Mexico

El Salvador

GuatemalaHonduras

Costa Rica

Hungary

Malawi

Malaysia

Greece

CroatiaFYROM

0-5,000 5-20,000 20-50,000 50-100,000 >100,000 >500,000 individual

Niger Sudan

Turkey

EgyptLibya

Mali

Ukraine

Estimated number of beneficiaries in shelter/NFI operations (2016)

Shelter/NFI operations

Total households assisted 986,000

Estimated total*Individuals assisted 5,220,000

Number ofcountries 52

2016

1,003,000

5,230,000

40

2015

** Including cash transfers related to shelter/NFI activities

individualbeneficiaries

Global Highlights 2016 2119

240

591

658

1,500

1,650

1,740

1,886

2,090

2,200

3,000

3,684

3,795

4,000

4,192

4,330

4,375

5,000

5,290

5,673

5,969

6,709

6,820

6,920

7,400

9,182

11,382

12,974

13,560

13,845

16,784

23,745

26,910

37,820

43,421

43,685

52,532

57,023

63,583

90,666

100,551

101,796

111,308

126,250

162,568

176,613

197,905

623,208

659,940

684,412

740,100

931,882

Dominica

FYR Macedonia

Malawi

Thailand

Hungary

Zimbabwe

Kenya

Guatemala

Papua New Guinea

Malaysia

Somalia

Honduras

Chad

Vanuatu

Peru

Philippines

Mauritania

Mexico

Costa Rica

Croatia

El Salvador

Sri Lanka

Micronesia

Rwanda

Greece

Cameroon

Mali

Jordan

Bangladesh

Egypt

Ecuador

Slovenia

Burundi

Ukraine

Marshall Islands

Fiji

Libya

DRC

Afghanistan

Myanmar

Ethiopia

Niger

Pakistan

Yemen

Sudan

Turkey

Nigeria

Iraq

Nepal

Whole of Syria

Haiti

South Sudan

Shelter/NFI operations

Estimated number of individual beneficiaries in Shelter/NFI operations (2016)

South SudanValues include beneficiaries reached through the NFI pipeline, managed by IOM, as well as life-saving interventions in Protection of Civilian sites across South Sudan.

HaitiThese values also include the all beneficiaries reached through the IOM-managed NFI pipeline in Haiti, both through direct distributions and implementing partners.

Whole of SyriaBeneficiaries include those assisted directly within Syria, as well as cross-border activities from Gazientep and Amman.


133

400

542

1,196

2,200

2,506

4,055

4,956

5,000

5,168

7,028

10,014

10,137

11,920

19,596

21,229

28,490

30,000

50,000

57,023

64,926

68,212

72,000

86,295

324,565

408,982

525,125

588,673

635,913

709,503

Croatia

Macedonia

Thailand

Sri Lanka

Malaysia

Libya

Malawi

Mauritania

Palau

Turkey

Rwanda

Myanmar

Philippines

Greece

Mozambique

Nepal

Marshall Islands

Uganda

Burundi

DRC

Ukraine

Bangladesh

Papua New Guinea

Mali

Pakistan

Somalia

Haiti

Yemen

Sudan

South Sudan

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene

Estimated totalindividuals assisted 3,750,000Number of

countries 30

541,000

Individuals servedwith sanitation activities

1,270,000

Individuals servedwith safe water

433,000

Individuals servedwith latrines

2,063,000

Individuals servedwith hygiene promotion

Estimated total number of WASH beneficiaries by country (2016)

South SudanValues include persons who benefitted from hygiene items distributed through IOM's WASH NFI pipeline, as well as those assisted with life-saving WASH activities in Protection of Civilian (PoC) sites.

SudanOver 40% of the beneficiaries have benefitted from hygiene promotion.

YemenThe estimated number of beneficiaries quoted above includes those who benefitted from a water network rehabilitation project (328,064), as well as distribution of water containers and purification filters (89,704).

Haiti95% of the beneficiaries reached benefitted from hygiene promotion activities.

Somalia64% of beneficiaries reached were assisted with access to safe water.


4,416

7,240

17,500

19,566

31,736

39,862

42,190

51,661

111,506

5,244

39

117,385

20,225

42,332

43,145

17,931

E-payments

Not specified

Remittance agency

ATM/Debit card

Vouchers & Cheques

Coupons

Cheques

Bank transfer

Cash in envelope

Vouchers

2015

2016

*

**

Implementing Partner

IOM Direct

Cash-based interventions

Total number of beneficiaries 327,000

Total amount paid to beneficiaries $10,550,000


2016

246,000

$11,000,000

14

2015

Implementationmechanism*

IOM DirectImplementation

66%

2015 91%

2016

PartnerImplementation

34%

20159%

2016

Total beneficiaries by method of delivery

$$

Excluding AVRR and other programmes with cash components

* Turkey accounts for 74% of this value (winterization)** Philippines accounts for 84% of this value

In 2016, IOM implemented 52 cash based inter-ventions in 17 countries, reaching over 300,000 beneficiaries. The programmes ranged from cash for work or rent programmes, construction materials and shelter reconstruction, as well as providing unconditional cash to cover basic needs of refugees.

Vouchers

Bank transfer

Cheques

Coupons

Combination

Not specified

E-payments

Cash in envelope

ATM/debit card

Remittance agency

53

1,385

7,240

17,500

19,566

31,736

39,862

42,177

53,722

114,142

5,244

39

117,385

20,225

42,332

43,145

17,931

20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000


$15,106

$22,500

$23,680

$69,402

$92,723

$100,600

$137,208

$258,600

$303,120

$352,905

$559,800

$766,446

$931,000

$1,161,363

$1,531,042

$1,705,136

$2,525,951

Thailand

Malawi

Guinea Conakry

DR Congo

Afghansitan

Lebanon

Nepal

Ecuador

Yemen

Rwanda

Somalia

Egypt

Turkey

Pakistan


Ukraine

Micronesia

Total amount paid to beneficiaries

Cash-based interventionsExcluding AVRR and other programmes with cash components

MicronesiaThe program provided 1,169 households with vouchers for contruction materials or tool kits.

UkraineThe programmes provided 4,712 households with unconditional cash transfers for IDPs to cover basic needs, and 1014 households with cash for rent.

Central African RepublicA cash for work programme implemented in conflict-affected areas, giving youth at risk an alternative, as well as revitalizing the local market.

99

1,258

6,035

17,064

77,951

3,730

12,839

23,951

85,665

98,791

- 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000

Medical

Livelihoods

Transport

Other

Cash for work

Cash for rent

Shelter

Modality Conditional

Unconditional

Modality*

ConditionalTransfers

69%

2015 29%

2016

UnconditionalTransfers

31%

201571%

2016Total beneficiaries by conditionality

Multi-purpose

Winterization

Constr. materials

Shelter construction

Cash for rent

Cash for work

Other**

TransportTransport

Livelihoods

Medical

Oth

erSh

elte

r

* Based on total number of beneficiaries assisted** Cash for food, hygiene and basic needs of refugees in Turkey


CCCM, 10

WASH, 3

Food Security, 1Health, 4

Merged CCCM, Shelter, NFI,

10

Displacement WG, 3Shelter WG, 3

Merged Shelter & WASH WG, 1

Health WG, 1

Inter Sector Coordination, 2

Recovery, 2

Protection, 2

Other, 24

Philippines

Vanuatu

BangladeshPapua New Guinea




EthiopiaSomalia

Yemen

Kenya

BurundiRwanda

South SudanNigeria

Dominican Republic

IraqHaitiHaiti PakistanNepal

Afghanistan

Ecuador

Greece

Timor Leste

Tajikistan

CambodiaGuinea

Mozambique

Colombia

Paraguay

ChadNiger Sudan

Turkey

Humanitarian response coordination

Countries included in data collection with coordination activities


Beneficiaries as a collective by sectors where IOM has got a coordination role

PIN - 43.1 Million

Targeted 27.3

Million

Reached /Covered

15.3 Million

In 2016, IOM held a coordination role in 52 cluster/sector/working group coordination platforms across 34 countries. This role varied from lead to co-lead or chairing such groups in a variety of thematic sectors and also Inter-Sector platforms. Three quarters of these coordination platforms were related to CCCM and Shelter activities in preparedness, response and transition phases. The contexts varied from natural disasters to conflict or complex situations including outbreaks and mixed migration flows. Information compiled reflects a “snapshot in time” based on information compiled which is not complete and subject to local interpretation of coordination arrangements.

A “cluster” is a formally activated cluster, i.e. a cluster activated in accordance with the procedures detailed in the agreed IASC policy on the matter, the Cluster Coordination Reference Module.

Cluster

A sector denotes a humanitarian coordination mechanism led by national Government or a designated national agency. International humanitarian support can augment national capacity, underpinned by the principles of the cluster approach.

Sector

A merged cluster denotes an arrangement whereby two clusters agree to merge into one entity. The resulting entity takes over the tasks of the initial clusters.

Merged Cluster

Sectoral breakdown

Dis

tinct

clu

ster

s an

d se

ctor

s

Brea

kdow

n of

var

ious

wor

king

gr

oups

and

task

forc

es

Shelter, 10


Philippines

Vanuatu

BangladeshPapua New Guinea




EthiopiaSomalia

Yemen

Kenya

BurundiRwanda

South SudanNigeria

Dominican Republic


Afghanistan

Ecuador

Greece

Timor Leste

Tajikistan

CambodiaGuinea

Mozambique

Colombia

Paraguay

ChadNiger Sudan

Turkey

IOM WASH Operations in 2016Humanitarian response coordination

Countrieswith formallyactivatedclusters

Countrieswith Sectorsand/orWorkinggroups

Countries with activated clusters with either all clusters active, or a mix of clusters & sectors

15

Countries with Sectors and/or working groups

19

71%

69%

63%

86%

86%

80%

Gender, age and diversity characteristics of the affected populationintegrated in assessments, analysis, cluster plans and monitoring.

Joint sectoral analyses of situation exists

Cluster_Sector Strategic plan exists

Mapping of partners and activities

Up-to-date lists of partners exists

Up-to-date meeting schedule exists 79%

85%

85%

62%

67%

69%

Reflection of performance of clusters/sectors where IOM has got a coordination role

Goo

d Pe

rfor

man

ce

49%

47%

29%

41%

41%

55%

49%

Mechanism to raise awareness, prevent, monitor and respond to SEA

or other advocacy documents produced by the cluster on behalf of thePress releases or other advocacy documents produced by the cluster on behalf of the affected population

Sectoral & Cluster staffing with dedicated IM capacity

Sectoral & Cluster staffing with full time coordinator in place

Preparedness plans for identified hazards exist and up-to-date

Cluster & Sector transition strategy exists

Mechanism to consult and involve affected people in decision-making

Mechanism to raise awareness, prevent, monitor and respond to SEA

49%

54%

40%

40%

29%

46%

48%

48%

Und

er P

erfo

rman

ce

Scenarios

Natural disaster,26

Cross-border delivery, 2

Mixed migration flows, 1

Outbreaks, 1

Complex, 13

Conflict, 17

Cluster & Sector strategic plan exists


CCCM Operations

Type of CCCM operationsGiven its role as Cluster lead, information manage-ment, including Site Assessment and Registration (DTM operations), are the main CCCM activities IOM is engaged in for CCCM operations.

There are opportunities to strenghten CCCM activities in participation and coordination of service provision at site level.

Implementation mechanismUse of cash in CCCM operations(Feedback from Haiti, Nepal and DRC)

Use of Cash in CCCM operations(Feedback from Haiti, Nepal and DRC)

Camp Closure Care and Maintenance (ES/NFI distribution)

CampClosure

67%Care & Maintenance(ES/NFI distribution)

33%

25% of the missions engaged in CCCM OPS report using cash, mainly in relation to Camp Closure (Return/Relocation Cash Grant).

Direct Implementation Vs Implementing partners

IPs Only Mixed Direct

ImplementingPartners only

8%

MixedImplementation

25%IOM DirectImplementation

67%

The largest part of our CCCM operations are implemented directly.

Vanuatu



Burundi

South SudanNigeria

IraqHaitiHaitiNepal

Ecuador

Croatia

ChadNiger

Countries included in data collection with CCCM operations


Number of countries

11

10

10

8

9

7

5

Service monitoring

Registration / Profiling

Participation

Camp selection /planning

Care and Maintenance

Camp closure

Coordination at site level

Camp set up or closure

41 sites

Camp management*

494 sites

* Monitoring and coordinating service provision at camp level, as well as setting up governance & community participation mechanisms


7

4

4

3

2

2

1

1

1

1

Establishing Committees / Governance structures

Participatory Assessment

Community Mobilization / Work opportunities

Complaint / Feedback Mechanisms

Regular meetings with power brokers

Conflict Resolution Mechanism

Community events / Recreational activities

Capacity Building of camp residents

Info Desk

Hotline

CCCM Operations

WASH33%

Shelter33%

Communal Infrastructures

11%

Health11%

Decommissioning6%

Electricity/IT6%

Main Care and Maintenance Activities

Main care and maintenance activities

Care and Maintenance activities in camps mainly target Shelter and WASH infrastructures.

There are opportunities to focus on communal infrastructures (meeting venue, space to organize events, religious building, safe spaces, etc.) which will further support the participation of the affected population.

Type of activities promoting increased participation of affected populationsEstablishing Camp Committee remains the main activity implemented to improve participation at site level.

Investment in other mechanisms such as capacity building which targets camp residents leadership skills should be expanded to additional areas of operations.

Donor supporting CCCM operations(Proportion of CO supported)

Number of countries

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

US (USAID, PRM, OFDA)

ECHO

JAPAN

CERF

DFID

Other donors: CEB, Resident Coordinator Office,MAECD, EC, Norway, NORCAP, CHF, Switzerland

Donor supporting CCCM Operations (Proportion of CO supported)

Other Donors**

** Such as CEB, Resident Coordinator Office, MEACD, EC, Norway, NORCAP, CHF, Switzerland

Vanuatu



Burundi

South SudanNigeria

IraqHaitiHaitiNepal

Ecuador

Croatia

ChadNiger

Camp care & maintenance

151 sites


CCCM Capacity-building

Number ofcountries 45 Number of

trainings 306

Philippines

Vanuatu

Bangladesh

Myanmar



Yemen

Burundi

South SudanNigeria

Dominica


Fiji

Ecuador

Costa Rica

Malawi

Indonesia

Greece

Austria

FYR Macedonia

Mozambique

BotswanaZambia

Angola

Laos

Ghana

Burkina Faso Saudi Arabia

Armenia

Argentina

Uruguay

Paraguay

Bolivia

GuyanaGuyanaVenezuelaVenezuela

Panama

Nicaragua

Republic of Korea

ChadMali

Syria

Mongolia

Countries included in data collection for CCCM capacity-building

Asia and the Pacific, 35%

Central and North America, & the Caribbean, 2%

East Africa, 9%

Eastern and Southeastern Europe & Central Asia, 1%European Economic Area, 2%

Middle East and North Africa, 3%

South America, 14%

Southern Africa, 29%

West and Central Africa, 5%

Events by Region

Events by setting

Peri-Urban Urban

Rural

Natural disaster, 52%

Conflict, 22%

Mixed migration, 20%

Not specified, 6%

Myanmar

Ecuador

Zambia

South Sudan

Mozambique

Angola

Botswana

Nepal

Nigeria

Philippines 12

12

12

18

19

22

23

23

36

57

Number of events by country (Top 10)

IOM provided training on CCCM, DTM, and GBV mainstreaming, to governments and humanitarian partners in the last year. CCCM related training events took place around mostly natural disaster scenarios and close to half of them in the emergency response phase. The predominant countries were in West Africa (Nigeria), Myanmar and Central America (Ecuador) where the April earthquake suddenly displaced thousands of people in the last year. CCCM training of national and local authorities aims to capacitate authorities to be able to respond to new disasters, migration situations and DRR. To make knowledge more easily accessible, and to encourage self-learning, an e-learning platform was developed and will be ready for learners to self study in April 2017. In line with the localization agenda, focus shifted to creating cadres of national CCCM trainers in high risk countries, rather than investing in external experts.


CCCM Capacity-building

Philippines

Vanuatu

Bangladesh

Myanmar



Yemen

Burundi

South SudanNigeria

Dominica


Fiji

Ecuador

Costa Rica

Malawi

Indonesia

Greece

Austria

FYR Macedonia

Mozambique

BotswanaZambia

Angola

Laos

Ghana

Burkina Faso Saudi Arabia

Armenia

Argentina

Uruguay

Paraguay

Bolivia

GuyanaGuyanaVenezuelaVenezuela

Panama

Nicaragua

Republic of Korea

ChadMali

Syria

Mongolia

Training workshops91%

Not specified, 3%

On the job training, 2%

E-Learning, 2%

Coaching, 1%

Types of capacity-building

Prevention and mitigation, 8%

Recovery and rehabilitation, 9%

Preparedness, 32%

Relief and response, 46%

Not specified, 5%

English

118 events in 19 countries

Spanish


Portuguese


Burmese

35 events in 1 country

20 events 3 countries

* Size of circle based on proportion of number of events** Humanitarian Border Management

Arabic13 events in 4 countries

French11 events in 6 countries

Urdu

Bahasa

Lao

Mongolian

Macedonian

English + local language

Language and translation of events

0.3%

2%

6%

8%

8%

72%

0 50 100 150 200 250

HBM during migration crisis

Validation or development of good practice

training of others (ToT)

Cluster coordinators

Policy development & Action planning

Direct application for the benefit of IDPs

Application of training content

Type of capacity-building events by phase of operation

Training of Trainers (ToT)

**


Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM)

Peak number of IDPs tracked* Over 14.5 million

Active operations as of December 2016 40 Active operations

during 2016 44

SyriaIraqNigeriaYemenSouth Sudan

Top 5 countries representing approx 80% of caseload tracked:

LibyaEcuadorFijiGuatemalaEl SalvadorHonduras

Countries with displacement tracking activities (2016)

Displacement tracking activities in 2016

New operations set up in 2016:

PhilippinesMyanmar


Yemen

Burundi

South SudanNigeria

Iraq

SyriaHaitiHaiti

AfghanistanNepal

Fiji

Ecuador Indonesia

Mozambique

Papua New Guinea

Zimbabwe

CameroonCentral African Republic

EthiopiaSomaliaColombia

Honduras

El SalvadorEl Salvador

Guatemala

Libya

MaliChad


44

Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM)

Flow monitoring activities in 2016

BulgariaFranceFYR MacedoniaGreat BritainGreeceHungaryIraq

Flow monitoring operations 2016

PhilippinesMyanmar


Yemen

Burundi

South SudanNigeria

Iraq

SyriaHaitiHaiti

AfghanistanNepal

Fiji

Ecuador Indonesia

Mozambique

Papua New Guinea

Zimbabwe

CameroonCentral African Republic

EthiopiaSomaliaColombia

Honduras

El SalvadorEl Salvador

Guatemala

Libya

MaliChad

Yemen

South SudanNiger

SyriaHaitiHaiti

AfghanistanPakistan

SomaliaColombia

Costa Rica

Britain

Netherlands

FranceItaly

HungaryCroatia

SerbiaBulgaria

Turkey

Greece

FYR Macedonia

Libya

Mali

Countries with flow monitoring activities (2016)

Activities in the Mediterranean migration routes span across 15 countries, including origin and final destination countries.

Surveys conducted to nearly 20,000 migrants

32 rounds of information products Over 200,000 views

on website portal (migration.iom.int)

Other activities outside of the Mediterranean migration routes:

Cross border monitoring in 6 countries

Movements in and out of PoC sites in 1 country

Afghanistan ColombiaCosta RicaFYR MacedoniaGreece ItalyLibya

MaliNigerSerbiaSomaliaSouth SudanYemen

ItalyLibyaNetherlandsNigerSerbiaTurkey

Surveys in: Flow monitoring points in:

Note: Countries marked in bold were newly set up in 2016

Date post:	13-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

Global Activities 2016 - International Organization for ... · Nigeria Iraq Nepal Whole of Syria...

Documents