®
QUAlity aware VIsualisation for the Global Earth QUAlity aware VIsualisation for the Global Earth Observation system of systemsObservation system of systems
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
“Global Carbon Project”
pilot case study
(CEA-LSCE)
Philippe Peylin, Philippe Ciais,
Pep Canadell, Zegbeu poussi
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
2
atmospheric CO2
ocean
land
fossil fuel emissions
deforestation
7.6
1.5
4.1
2.22.8
2000-2006
CO2 f
lux
(Pg
C y-1
)Si
nkSo
urce
Time (y)
Perturbation of Global Carbon Budget (1850-2006)
Canadell et al. 2007, PNAS
?
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
3
Global Carbon Project
?
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
4
Global Carbon Pilot case
Which products can we provide ?(based on models & data)
What are the associated Quality Data ? (still “poorly” developed)
What are the potential Metadata ?
5
Global carbon product
Direct Model simulations
Meteo forcing &surface description
Land surface& oceanmodels
Estimated surfaceC fluxes
Data – fusion approaches
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
6
Direct estimates of Carbon fluxes
Several Product
with different data Quality
Global land ecosystem model simulations
Global ocean model simulations
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
7
Meteorological forcing
Land surfaceDescription (Veg. soil,..)
Land surfacemodel
Estimated surfaceC fluxes
• Several model simulations (TRENDY / RECCAP project)
• For each model possibly several simulations (different forcing)
• Product: - Global annual/monthly C fluxes
- Derived quantities: Trend in land C-sinks
• Quality data : - on the input data (forcing , land cover)
- derived from the multi-model realization
• Metadata : - information on the protocol & models
Land ecosystem model simulations
8
Quality of product
usually arise from:
- evaluation against
other estimates/proxy
- potentially error
propagation
- Assessment of
model strength
- How to use multi
model ?
9
Product Evaluation as a Quality measure
Diagnose Trend in Land fluxes
Evaluation against
other products ?
(i.e. EO data)
How to facilitate the link with other products ?
- Climate data- land cover changes/use- forestry data- biomass burning- soil data (moisture)- crop yields
10
Case of Data-Assimilation: atmospheric inversion…
Inverse optimization
key features • Combination of 2 sources of information !• Only ~ 100 stations for many fluxes to solve for
Prior flux information Transport model
Atmospheric data
Optimized fluxes
Several approaches
• Flux resolution• Transport model• Level of prior inform. • Optimization algorithm
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
11
Global carbon pilot case
Data availability
Surface flux Maps (3D) : - weekly to monthly resolution- common grid : 1x 1 degree- several variables (Net flux, Gross fluxes, …)
Spatially integrated fluxes :- Time series for a set of regions- different temporal filtering
(trend, smooth curve,..)
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
12
Global carbon pilot case
Associated Quality Data (mainly uncertainties)
Surface flux Maps (3D) : - uncertainties (in the form of std-dev) (often at lower temporal resolution)- use the spread between the different estimates
Not yet completely defined !
Spatially integrated fluxes :- Uncertainties for each time step - error covariance matrix at low temp. resol.- use the spread btw estimates + individual errors
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
13
Global carbon pilot case
Associated Metadata
Input data : Text description of the input data
Model (Data Assimilation system)
flow chart, little text documentation….description of the “uncertainty calculation”
Estimated fluxes & uncertainties :possibly “qualitative description of accuracy”as a function of space & time aggregation.
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
14
Carbon fluxes interannual variations
Europe
N. America N. Atlantic
N. Asia
LSCE_an_v2.1JENA_s96_v3.2CTracker_EU
LSCE_var_v1.C13_MATCHCTracker_US
TRCOM_meRIGC_patra JMA_2010
C13_CCAMNCAM_Niwa
?
?
?
How to associate a Quality Measure ?
15
Quality indications from model spread ?
Mean flux estimate RMSE estimate
Estimates are not independent ? Uncertainty on the uncertainties is very large !
16
Summary …. Carbon flux products : increasing number but no common visualization framework
As part of GCP we can provide a large set of fluxes & some associated errors, few metadata...
How to use the tools from GeoViQua ?- Incorporate them in our Portal Developments or provide the datasets to GeoViQua ?- Large volume of netcdf files…
We need tools to derive overall quality measures from different estimates (with different uncertainties) and to display them..
We are seeking for a Post-doc….
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
17
Carbon Cycle Web portals
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
18
Global Carbon Project
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
19
GCP: atmospheric data
In situ data- very accurate but sparse - spatial representativity ?
- Instrumental failure ?- Quality Data exist..
(visualisation under progress)
satellite data - accuracy issues (biases) !- accuracy might vary with
space- cloud/aerosols…
contamination
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
20
Carbon Tracker Web site (US)
N. America
?
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
21
GEO carbon agenda…..
• Record changes in atmospheric CO2
• Estimate fossil and land use derived emissions
• Understand land and ocean carbon sinks
– Measure fluxes/concentrations
– Understand processes
– Model time & space evolution
in order to predict future of the Earth System
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
22
Model – Data Fusion for GCPD
ata
un
cert
ain
ties
Dat
a u
nce
rtai
nti
es
Flux uncertainties difficult to estimate !
Model uncertainties
UncertaintiesModel – Data fusion
(4D var scheme)
(Baye’s theorem)
Variational / Matrix / approaches
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
23
GCP: Land ecosystem data
In situ data- very accurate but sparse - spatial representativity ?
- “Quality” not well quantified..
satellite data - accuracy vary with space..- saturation signal with veg.
activity- link to vegetation function ?
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
24
Global Carbon Project
Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011
25
GCP: Ocean data
Ship data- accurate but sparse
- spatial representativity ?- Spatial coverage ?
satellite data - accuracy issues (biases) !
- link to ocean biogeochemistry ?