+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Date post: 26-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: luis-moore
View: 218 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
51
Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net
Transcript
Page 1: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy Trends 2004

By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Page 2: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Global E-Democracy Trends

Presentation Outline

• Introduction• Defining e-democracy• Democratic sector examples• E-democracy outcomes• Next generation explorations • Conclusion• Further information

Page 3: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Introduction

Page 4: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Introduction

•“Is this the end to politics as we know it?”

– Question from a reporter in 1994

Page 5: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Introduction

•No Secret:

In the online era, set low expectations and declare victory!

Page 6: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Defining e-democracy

Page 7: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Defining e-democracy• E-democracy is:

– the use information and communication technologies and strategies

– by “democratic sectors”

– within the political processes of local communities, states, nations and on the global stage.

Political Groups

Private SectorGovernment

Media and Commercial

Content

Page 8: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Defining e-democracy

• E-democracy …– is now, what kind is it?

– is accelerating “as is” politics

– will promote active citizen participation only with the “e-citizen” perspective included

– What is its goal?

Political Groups

Private SectorGovernment

Media and Commercial

Content

E-Citizens

Page 9: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Democratic Sectors

Page 10: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Democratic Sectors• Representative Institutions

LiveVideo

Page 11: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Democratic Sectors• Representatives – Political leaders galore

LiveVideo

Page 12: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Democratic Sectors

• Political news online – The main public window

LiveVideo

Page 13: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Democratic Sectors

• Political Groups – 1,000,000s of sites

LiveVideo

Page 14: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Democratic Sectors

• Campaigning online … US President

LiveVideo

Page 15: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

E-democracy Outcomes

Page 16: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

E-democracy outcomes

• E-democracy should seek to:– improve the democratic outcomes of the

policy process– engage citizens in meeting public

challenges

• Involvement for the sake of involvement has limited value.

• E-democracy must make a qualitative difference.

Page 17: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

E-democracy outcomes

• Why improve e-democracy?– Noise and conflict from online

advocacy

– Citizen expectations of “two-way” medium

– Better decisions, smarter government

– Accommodate the will of the people

Page 18: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

E-democracy outcomes

• Understanding government’s role:–It’s not all on your shoulders

–Do the best in your area

–Working pro-actively with other sectors to accelerate benefits, deepen citizen engagement

Page 19: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

E-democracy outcomes

• What outcomes? – Trust and Accountability

– Legitimacy and Understanding

– Citizen Satisfaction

– Reach and Equitable Access

Detailed in my “E-Government and Democracy” article for the United Nation’s World Public Sector Report:

http://publicus.net/e-government

Page 20: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

E-democracy outcomes

• What outcomes? Continued …– Effective Representation and

Decision-Making– Participation through Input and

Consultation– Engagement and Deliberation

Detailed in my “E-Government and Democracy” article for the United Nation’s World Public Sector Report:

http://publicus.net/e-government

Page 21: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Next GenerationApplications

Page 22: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Next Generation Applications

• Representation• Personalization and Notification• Decision-Making and Leadership• Consultation and E-Rulemaking• Accountability• Policy Implementation• Citizen Participation and Online Dialogue

Page 23: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Representation

• Use of ICTs by representative institutions and elected officials

• Balance of power issues important

• Examples

– Parliaments Online – Iceland, Minnesota,

– Jan Hamming, Tilberg, The Netherlands

• Must ensure that elected officials have the tools to represent – break the “services first, democracy later” perspective

Page 24: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Representation• Iceland – What’s now

LiveVideo

Page 25: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Representation

• Hamming – Virtual Office

LiveVideo

Page 26: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Representation• Minnesota House – Real-time access

LiveVideo

Page 27: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Personalization and Notification

• Information access with user defined notification = dissemination.

• Timely access to politically relevant information is the key innovation

• Examples

– City of St. Paul, Minnesota

– Info4Local.Gov.uk

– Menlo Park, California

Page 28: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Personalization and Notification• City of St. Paul – E-mail notices

LiveVideo

Page 29: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Personalization and Notification

• Personalization and e-mail notification =real service

• www.info4local.gov.uk

Page 30: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Personalization

Communication personalization – no e-mail overload here, Menlo Park, California

Page 31: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Personalization

• Personalized tracking, user generated “hot” links

LiveVideo

Page 32: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Localization

• Personalization based on Geography, Interests

LiveVideo

Page 33: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Decision-Making & Leadership

• Cabinet-level strategic communication to assist decision-making

• Countries with advanced systems include Finland, Estonia, and Croatia.

• Leadership? Japan’s PM has two million subscribers on his M-Magazine e-mail list.

Croatian cabinet, Source: Microsoft

Page 34: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Decision-Making & Leadership

• Japan PM’s M-Magazine - 2 Mil e-subscribers

Page 35: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Consultation and E-Rulemaking

• Online consultation is the leading “e-democracy” interest area within the administrative side of government – particularly in the Europe, Canada, and Australia.

• E-rulemaking in the United States.

• Examples

– UK eDemocracy Consultation

– Top ten tips – Article with examples

Page 36: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Consultation and E-Rulemaking

• UK eDemocracy consultation

Page 37: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Consultation and E-Rulemaking

• Online consultations

Page 38: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Consultation• Meetings with District Manager

Wireless Video Conferencing

– Citizens in 8 rural Indian villages– Discussed “lack of village bus services and roads, illegal

possession of land, financial assistance to a widow, and agricultural training and seed distribution to local self-help groups” – Source: n-Logue.com (co. of Indian Inst Tech, Madras)

Page 39: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Accountability

• Public accountability ranks first among U.S. citizen priorities for e-government:

– 36% - Government that is more accountable to its citizens

– 23% - Greater public access to information 

– 21% - More efficient and cost-effective government

– 13% - More convenient government services 

Source, E-Government the Next American Revolution, September 2002

Page 40: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Accountability

• Seoul Anti-Corruption – OPEN System

Page 41: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Accountability

• US Farm Support Payments Look-up

Page 42: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Accountability• Deep Transparency – Yalova, Turkey

According to their Dec. 2003 presentation, they provide/plan to provide access to:

•Council decisions

•Immediate flow of incomes

•Daily flow of expenditures

•Municipal Tenders

•Citizen applications and document follow-up

•Wealth Declaration - Increase/decrease of income and wealth of top officials (on left)

Page 43: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Policy Implementation

• Output versus input – moving government from sole provider to a facilitator of information exchange among diverse stakeholders working to meet similar public challenges.

• “Public Net-work” Examples

– CommunityBuildersNSW

– OneFish

– Development Gateway

• Models also have NGO-led potential

Page 44: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Policy Implementation

• Portals, information exchange, events

Page 45: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Policy Implementation

• Information exchange

Page 46: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Citizen Participation

• Citizen participation and online dialogue demonstrate an e-democracy future that can transform politics.

• Connecting people within democracies from the local level on up, embracing geography, is a key starting point.

• See Minnesota E-Democracy.

• This is the focus of much of my work, and truly the domain of the “e-citizen.”

Page 47: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Citizen Participation

• Visit http://www.e-democracy.org

Page 48: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Conclusion

Page 49: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Conclusion

• E-democracy’s exciting dimensions deserve deep exploration and experimentation.

• Innovative practices NOT being made widely known. Therefore, NOT spreading rapidly.

• “Services first, democracy later” approach is a significant barrier to balanced and successful e-government

more …

Page 50: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Conclusion

• Promoting leading e-democracy strategies across government, NGOs, and the media and private sector requires investment.

• With democratic intent, information and communications technologies can be used to meet public challenges and lead to better public outcomes.

• E-democracy success = when we drop the “e”

Page 51: Global E-Democracy Trends 2004 By Steven Clift, Publicus.Net.

Global E-Democracy TrendsCopyright 2003, Steven Clift, Publicus.Net

Further Information

• Democracies Online Newswirehttp://www.dowire.orgOver 2500 people around the world exchanging announcements, news, and articles related to e-democracy, e-government, and e-politics.

• E-Democracy Resources Flyerhttp://publicus.net/articles/edemresources.htmlLinks to the top e-democracy starting points on a two page flyer available in HTML, Word, and PDF.

• Publicus.Net http://www.publicus.netMore articles and presentations by Steven Clift


Recommended