Date post: | 13-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | juliet-chambers |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 4 times |
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 1
Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Mission Four (HST SM4):
Unique Challenges for STS-125
Bob Dedalis, HST Payload Safety ManagerMiranda Cooter, HST Lead Flight Safety Engineer
Patrick Mitchell, Payload Safety Review Panel Executive Secretary
William Hill, HST Lead Ground Safety EngineerPhillip Adkins, Systems Safety Engineer
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 2
Introduction
• Mission Overview– SM4 first time in seven years HST serviced
» Nominal design called for once every 3 years
– More new hardware than any previous mission
» SIC&DH added very late
– First time since Columbia a shuttle was not used for ISS construction
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 3
Major Tasks
Task Impact to HubbleInstall WFC3 –
Wide Field Camera 3Installed a high-resolution/wide-field camera with continuous coverage of wavelengths or colors of light from the ultraviolet to the near-infrared.
Install COS – Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Installed the most sensitive ultraviolet spectrograph ever to fly on HST.
Repair STIS Restored the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph to operational status byreplacing circuit boards.
Repair ACS Restored critical scientific functionality to the Advanced Camera for Surveysby replacing power supply and circuit boards.
Replace Rate Sensor Units (RSU) (gyroscopes)
Completed change-out of all six gyroscopes, the heart of HST's pointingsystem, and HST's main wear-out items.
FGS - Fine Guidance Sensor Last in a series of changed-out units that allow fine pointing of HST.
Replace Batteries Replaced the six batteries originally launched with Hubble in 1990, which aresteadily losing capacity as they age.
Install Soft Capture and Rendezvous System
Installed the Soft Capture Mechanism on the bottom of Hubble to enable NASA to pursue options for the safe disposal of Hubble.
Install New Outer Blanket Layers (NOBLs)
Installed NOBL covers to thermally protect the exterior blankets and maintain
normal operating temperatures of Hubble's electronic equipment.
Replace Science Instrument Control & Data Handler (SIC&DH) unit
Replaced the original unit launched with Hubble in 1990 to insure redundancy
of operations after September 2008 failure of Side A Control Unit/ScienceData Formatter (CU/SDF).
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 4
Payload Bay Equipment
• Four Full Equipment Carriers
• Included a servicing platform
Flight Support System pivots and rotates to enable in-bay servicing
Science Instrument Control and Data Handling Unit
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 5
Payload Safety Review Process
Preliminary Hazard Reports
Identification of Hazards
Preliminary Hazard Reports
Identification of Hazards
Safety ReviewPhase 0
Design Concept
Hazard Report
Identify Hazard Controls
Payload Organization Concurrence
NSTS Concurrence
Hazard Report
Identify Hazard Controls
Payload Organization Concurrence
NSTS Concurrence
Safety ReviewPhase IPDR
ForEachHazard
UpdateOnly
UpdateOnly
Hazard Report
Verify HardwareAs Built
Implement Controls
Payload Organization Concurrence
NSTS Concurrence
Hazard Report
Verify HardwareAs Built
Implement Controls
Payload Organization Concurrence
NSTS Concurrence
Safety ReviewPhase IIIDelivery
Hazard Report
Verify Design Implement Controls
Payload Organization Concurrence
NSTS Concurrence
Hazard Report
Verify Design Implement Controls
Payload Organization Concurrence
NSTS Concurrence
Safety ReviewPhase II
CDR
Flight Safety Verification Tracking Log
Track Verification of Items To Be ConductedAfter Phase III Review
Payload Organization Approval
NSTS Review
Flight Safety Verification Tracking Log
Track Verification of Items To Be ConductedAfter Phase III Review
Payload Organization Approval
NSTS Review
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 6
Hazard Identification Process
04/18/23
System/ Sub-system/Interfaces
System/ Sub-system/Interfaces
Hazard to Crew/STSHazard to Crew/STS
Postulate Failure (PHA/FMEA/FTA)
NoHazard
NoHazard
Yes Requirements Met
Requirements Met
Yes (Generic Hazard)
WriteHR
WriteHR
Perform Hazard Assessment
Perform Hazard Assessment
No
NSTS Requirements
Confirm Fault Tolerance or DFMR in
Design/Operations
Confirm Fault Tolerance or DFMR in
Design/Operations
Catastrophic
1 Fault-Tolerant
ARHR *ARHR *
2 Fault-Tolerant
Write HRWrite HR
Critical WriteHR
WriteHR
Review with JSCReview
with JSC
Not Approved
ApprovedApproved
Change Design
Change Design
Verify ControlsVerify
Controls
Document for CoFR
Document for CoFR
No
RedesignRedesign
* ARHR (Accepted Risk Hazard Report): New to the PSRP documentation process for SM4. Method for Shuttle program to accept the risk of safety non-compliant conditions
* ARHR (Accepted Risk Hazard Report): New to the PSRP documentation process for SM4. Method for Shuttle program to accept the risk of safety non-compliant conditions
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 7
Final Flight Safety Post Phase III/Part 4
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 8
Safety Challenges
• Soft Capture Mechanism (SCM)
• Batteries
• Late addition of Science Instrument Control and Data Handler (SIC&DH)
• Complex on-orbit Repairs–STIS
–Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS)
• Lack of Shuttle Safe-Haven
• Increased chance of on-orbit debris
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 9
Soft Capture Mechanism and Battery Isolation Switch
Miranda Cooter
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 10
Soft Capture Mechanism
• Designed to enable controlled de-orbit– HST originally designed to be returned in payload
bay
– HST does not have propulsion system
• Installed onto Aft Shroud– Flew on FSS between HST and FSS support ring
– Was risk of connecting HST to FSS via SCM (inability to close shuttle payload bay doors)
• Systems Safety participated in initial design– Performed Initiating Event Tree Analysis
– Insured that each major function included crew-activated override
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 11
Soft Capture Mechanism
Soft Capture Mechanism
Servicing Platform
Berthing Latches
andSCM Attach
Points
Crew-Activated Remote Drive
Berthing Latch outside SCM attach mechanisms
Soft Capture Mechanism Detail on Next Slide
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 12
SCM Mechanism Detail
HST Attach Override
HST Release Override
FSS Release Override
FSS Attach Override
Sill Plate Adapter
FSS Override Assy
Radial In View Radial Out View
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 13
Final SCM Fault Tolerance
• Separated Mission Success issues from Safety concerns– Mission Success is single fault tolerant– Flight Safety must be dual fault tolerant
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 14
Batteries
• Launched charged– 88 amp-hour batteries– Nickel Hydrogen
• Battery Isolation Switch (BIS) Installed
– COTS product– Based on military
headlight switch– Not designed to be fail-
safe
• Barrier Analysis applied
Battery Isolation Switches (BIS)
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 15
BIS DesignBIS Cut-Away
UPPER HOUSING NON-CONDUCTIVE
PAINT, 10E12 OHMS@ 100V
Not To Scale DP 092706
BIS CUTAWAY.CV5
HANDLE NON-CONDUCTIVE
WHITE PAINT A276 COATING
FRACTURE CRITICAL VESPEL
LOCKINGFASTERNER,
HEAD COATED WITH ARATHANE 5753
BMA LID
SUPPORT TUBE BRACKET
G10
Cd PLATED LOWER HOUSING
ARATHANE
YELLOW = CAD PLATE
RTV 1142
RTV 1142
LOCKING NUT (TYP)
JAM NUT TOOTH WASHER FLAT WASHER STACK (TYP)
Cd Plated Parts
Fracture Critical
Paint; Non-Conductive, White
Paint; Non-Conductive, Black
Mechanical:Locking & Split Washers
Mechanical:Split & Notched
Washers
Ag
Ag
Zinc plate washer & cap screw
Grease, silicone based oil with thickener
KAPTON or other barrier
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 16
Modifications to BIS• BIS Not Fail-safe
– Failure causes switch to be closed (i.e. ON)
– Identified as a safety issue
• Conducted Hazard Analysis– No Backaway prevention on handle
– Possibility of Whiskers
» Cadmium and Zinc coatings
– Potential for “hot” handle if internal failure
» Not visually identifiable to crew
• Hazard process improved design– Staked handle fastener to prevent backaway
– Detailed analysis of potential for whiskers» Found whiskers in non-flight version of BIS
» Through analysis & test, determined that, for this design, whiskers cannot sustain arc
– Added non-conductive paint to handles
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 17
IMAX Accommodations and Science Instrument Control and
Data Handling
Phillip Adkins
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 18
ORUC with IMAX Accommodations
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 19
Steps to Certify IMAX
• Previous IMAX flights reviewed with new analysis/testing done as needed–Proof Pressure Testing
–Vibration
–Functional Test
–Thermal Vacuum Test
• New Carrier Electrical Harness
• IMAX presented as a separate reflown payload
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 20
MULE Picture
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 21
Late Addition of SIC&DH
• Reduced time for final certification– Six month certification cycle
• Flight safety closely integrated with design and development to insure success
– Safety documentation available from unit certifications
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 22
EVA Safety Considerations
Bill Hill
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 23
Extra-Vehicular Activities (EVA)
• Included instrument and equipment exchange–Done on each previous servicing mission
• New techniques and tools developed for on-orbit, in situ repairs of instrument–Highly complex operations–Required specially designed tools to enable
delicate repairs to circuit boards tailored to crew needs
–Flight safety engineers participated in tool development beginning with design
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 24
EVA Timeline
• Five long days of EVA with four astronauts participating
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 25
Tool Development Process
• Tools Developed and designed with crew and safety participation• Design and development includes full review and verification
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 26
STIS Repair Tools
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 27
FCP After Removal On-orbit
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 28
Shuttle Specific Challenges
Patrick Mitchell
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 29
Shuttle-Specific Safety Challenges
• ISS was not available for Safe-Haven– Launch-on-need (LON) shuttle processed and
available for rescue
• Enhanced Micro-Meteorite On-orbit Debris (MMOD) Risk
– Shuttle flew protected attitudes when HST specific operations permitted
• Shuttle inspections performed – Tile inspections performed before and after servicing
– Insures no damage during ascent or from MMOD
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 30
Launch On Need STS-400
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 31
Solutions Applied
• Safety Systems Analysis Techniques Used– Initiating Event Tree Analysis (IETA)– Barrier Analyses– Fault Tolerance Analyses
• JSC Safety Requirements and Processes• Safety engineer integration into hardware
design teams resulted in safe hardware by design
Successful application of System Safety techniques contributed to a successful Servicing
Mission
LOGO.049
Goddard Space Flight Center
September 1, 2009 CHART 32
HST After SM4 Deployment