Governance systems and management practice in ... · Governance systems and management practice in...

Governance systems and management practice in international elite sport –

Examples for national solutions

Dr. Hartmut SandnerInstitute for Applied Training Science Leipzig

Post-Olympic Workshop

Paris17./18.1.2013

Source: plista.com

Governance and governance systems

Governance

•system by which an organisation is directed/managed

•the rules and procedures to make decisions

•determines the means to optimize and monitor performance

•is important to develop strategies and goals

H. Sandner – Governance and management in elite sport – INSEP 2013

Governance systems

•strategic planning framework for core values, goals and performance indicators

•documented board – management interaction

•process for legal, compliance and risk management

•audit system for internal and external processes

•performance management system to compare performance against plans

Source: ASC: Sports Governance Principles, 2012

Important topics for elite sport development (1980s )

1. Definition of clear and challenging goals for the system as a whole as well as for its different elements

based on detailed analyses of the international as well as of the national state-of-the-art

2. Clear and strict management structures on national level (NOC, NGOs) as well as on the level of the

sport associations for the preparation and implementation of necessary decisions with an unequivocal

definition of duties, responsibilities and rights

3. Effective structures and organisation of coaches’ academic training and further education

4. System of applied training science and research with an interdisciplinary sport-specific approach to

the benefit of athletic performance as a link between theory and practice

5. Development and control of scientifically based sport specific training systems


5. Development and control of scientifically based sport specific training systems

6. Long-term approach of performance development both with respect to training content and effective

solutions for the combination between school and academic education and advanced athletic training

7. Country-wide adapted school and academic training system for gifted young athletes

8. Comprehensive system of talent scouting and identification and a challenging national competition

system on local, regional, national and international level for all age-groups in junior elite sport

9. A well functioning system of sports medical care for all age-groups and research

10. Allocation of resources and funds available to a selected number of sports which were considered to

guarantee a high international performance standard to win medals in major international events

Source: Sandner, 2004

Important topics for elite sport development (2000- 2012)

Source:De Bosscher, 2006

Based on high social, political reputation and support for elite sport, an efficient elite sport structure and sufficient financial resources there are three factors that can strongly influence performance development: • talent identification and development , • well educated coaches and excellent coaching as well as • sport scientific research and development for elite sport


International developmental trends in elite sport

Extention of the competition calendar and changes inthe competition system

Medialisation/commercialisation,

increase in competitions’ attractivity

Changes in rules andregulations and in the qualification systems

Concentration on selected “national” sports

Improvement of competitionequipment, esp. sport

apparatusesContinuing (partially jerky) performance development

qualification systems

Increasing coaches’ and athletes’ transfer

Increase in performance densityHigher financial bonusesIncreasing willingness to

take a risk

apparatuses

Increasing anti-doping-actions

Expansion of elitesport research

“Organisation” of com-petition performance being at the place of the event,

(High-Performance-Centre),complex application of IT and

video solutions

H. Sandner – Governance and management in elite sport – INSEP 2013Pfützner, 2012

Olympic Games facts

nations eventsmax. n-medals

n-athletes women

199 300 501 10.651 38,2 %


201 301 513 10.625 40,7 %

204 302 504 10.942 42,4 %

204 302 496 10.923 44,4 %

Long-term comparison - sustainability

rank country G S B 4 5 6 7 8 Pt. +/-

1 Canada 26 14 7 5 7 17 9 6 7 340 +18 %

Torino 2006 24 7 10 7 13 8 4 4 4 289

2 Germany 30 10 13 7 8 8 7 5 6 322 -4 %

Torino 2006 29 11 12 6 8 8 10 10 7 337

3 USA 37 9 15 13 8 5 8 5 7 356 +21 %

Torino 2006 25 9 9 7 7 3 11 14 9 294

4 Norway 23 9 8 6 6 5 5 4 8 245 +3 %

Torino 2006 19 2 8 9 10 8 6 5 3 239

5 Korea 14 6 6 2 3 4 2 3 140 +54 %

Torino 2006 11 6 3 2 1 1 1 91Torino 2006 11 6 3 2 1 1 1 91

6 Switzerland 9 6 3 6 3 4 3 2 128 -20 %

Torino 2006 14 5 4 5 2 5 3 9 5 160

7 Sweden 11 5 2 4 8 3 2 3 3 145 -3 %

Torino 2006 14 7 2 5 3 4 4 1 4 149

8 China 11 5 2 4 2 2 4 6 3 123 +15 %

Torino 2006 11 2 4 5 2 3 2 2 1 107

9 Austria 16 4 6 6 9 7 7 5 5 219 +1 %

Torino 2006 23 9 7 7 5 3 2 3 4 216

10 Netherlands 8 4 1 3 4 2 4 3 2 105 +8 %

Torino 2006 9 3 2 4 3 2 3 1 1 97

11 Russia 15 3 5 7 9 6 7 6 184 -23 %

Torino 2006 22 8 6 8 6 6 6 4 4 238



rank country G S B 4 5 6 7 8 Pt. +/-

1 United States of America 104 46 29 29 26 29 17 19 18 1098 +2%

OS Beijing2008 110 36 38 36 21 30 11 16 14 1074

2 People's Republic of China 88 38 27 23 17 15 13 11 5 842 -13%

OS Beijing2008 100 51 21 28 21 20 12 8 9 969

3 Great Britain 65 29 17 19 7 32 14 12 15 709 +40%

OS Beijing2008 47 19 13 15 9 9 18 12 15 507

4 Russian Federation 82 24 26 32 20 26 14 12 16 852 +6%

OS Beijing2008 73 23 21 29 20 22 20 17 16 803

5 Korea 28 13 8 7 10 9 2 5 4 308 +8%


OS Beijing2008 31 13 10 8 3 7 3 3 5 285

6 Federal Republic of Germany 44 11 19 14 13 21 19 11 14 547 +10%

OS Beijing2008 41 16 10 15 14 20 8 11 14 498

7 France 34 11 11 12 14 12 10 10 12 417 -14%

OS Beijing2008 41 7 16 18 9 23 9 18 7 483

8 Italy 28 8 9 11 8 21 3 11 8 356 0%

OS Beijing2008 27 8 9 10 13 15 8 8 4 356

9 Hungary 17 8 4 6 4 5 7 2 3 196 +21%

OS Beijing2008 10 3 5 2 8 6 4 5 5 162

10 Australia 35 7 16 12 10 19 10 13 9 431 -18%

OS Beijing2008 46 14 15 17 11 16 19 10 9 524

11 Japan 38 7 14 17 5 16 7 7 7 387 +17%

OS Beijing2008 25 9 6 10 8 13 12 9 10 330


TOP 11 = 5,3 % of all participating NOCs

4.026 athletes = 36,5 % of all olympians

202 gold medals = 66,9 % of all Olympic champions

Despite extremely different presuppositions (for ex ample


Despite extremely different presuppositions (for ex ample with respect to number of inhabitants and economic power) countries rank among the TOP 11 in the nations‘ ran king in the Olympic Summer and Winter Games. They achieve t hese ranks not only once, but in many cases during a lon g period, they are very stable.

Which national strategies have been developed to achieve these results? Which national organisational structures and elements are applied?

Medal ranking and nations‘ points 2008 Olympics, WCh 2010-2012 and 2012 Olympics

rank country medals G S B 4 5 6 7 8 Points +/-1 USA 104 46 29 29 26 29 17 19 18 1098 2%

pre-olympic WCh-results 81 37 17 27 24 31 14 20 17 920 -14%

OG Beijing2008 110 36 38 36 21 30 11 16 14 1074

2 China 88 38 27 23 17 15 13 11 5 842 -13%

pre-Olympic WCh results 103 45 30 28 16 24 16 10 6 988 2%

OG Beijing2008 100 51 21 28 21 20 12 8 9 969

3 Great Britain 65 29 17 19 7 32 14 12 15 709 40%


OG Beijing2008 47 19 13 15 9 9 18 12 15 507

4 Russia 82 24 26 32 20 26 14 12 17 853 6%


OG Beijing2008 73 23 21 29 20 22 20 17 16 803

5 Korea 28 13 8 7 10 9 2 5 4 308 8%

pre-Olympic WCh results 28 6 5 17 2 8 8 10 4 275 -4%

OG Beijing2008 31 13 10 8 3 7 3 3 5 285

H. Sandner – Governance and management in elite sport – INSEP 2013www.bikila.org

OG Beijing2008 31 13 10 8 3 7 3 3 5 285

6 Germany 44 11 19 14 13 22 20 12 14 556 12%


OG Beijing2008 41 16 10 15 14 20 8 11 14 498

7 France 34 11 11 12 14 12 10 10 12 417 -14%


OG Beijing2008 41 7 16 18 9 23 9 18 7 483

8 Italy 28 8 9 11 8 21 3 11 9 357 0%


OG Beijing2008 27 8 9 10 13 15 8 8 4 356

9 Hungary 17 8 4 5 4 6 7 2 3 194 20%


OG Beijing2008 10 3 5 2 8 6 4 5 5 162

10 Australia 35 7 16 12 10 19 10 13 9 431 -18%


OG Beijing2008 46 14 15 17 11 16 19 10 9 524

11 Japan 38 7 14 17 5 16 7 7 7 387 17%


OS Beijing2008 25 9 6 10 8 13 12 9 10 330

Medal ranking and nations‘ points 2008 Olympics, WCh 2010-2012 and 2012 Olympics

rank country medals G S B 4 5 6 7 8 Points +/-1 USA 104 46 29 29 26 29 17 19 18 1098 2%

pre-olympic WCh-results 81 37 17 27 24 31 14 20 17 920 -14%

OG Beijing2008 110 36 38 36 21 30 11 16 14 1074

2 China 88 38 27 23 17 15 13 11 5 842 -13%


OG Beijing2008 100 51 21 28 21 20 12 8 9 969

3 Great Britain 65 29 17 19 7 32 14 12 15 709 40%


OG Beijing2008 47 19 13 15 9 9 18 12 15 507

4 Russia 82 24 26 32 20 26 14 12 17 853 6%


OG Beijing2008 73 23 21 29 20 22 20 17 16 803

5 Korea 28 13 8 7 10 9 2 5 4 308 8%


OG Beijing2008 31 13 10 8 3 7 3 3 5 285

JISS multi-support house

H. Sandner – Governance and management in elite sport – INSEP 2013www.bikila.org

OG Beijing2008 31 13 10 8 3 7 3 3 5 285

6 Germany 44 11 19 14 13 22 20 12 14 556 12%


OG Beijing2008 41 16 10 15 14 20 8 11 14 498

7 France 34 11 11 12 14 12 10 10 12 417 -14%


OG Beijing2008 41 7 16 18 9 23 9 18 7 483

8 Italy 28 8 9 11 8 21 3 11 9 357 0%


OG Beijing2008 27 8 9 10 13 15 8 8 4 356

9 Hungary 17 8 4 5 4 6 7 2 3 194 20%


OG Beijing2008 10 3 5 2 8 6 4 5 5 162

10 Australia 35 7 16 12 10 19 10 13 9 431 -18%


OG Beijing2008 46 14 15 17 11 16 19 10 9 524

11 Japan 38 7 14 17 5 16 7 7 7 387 17%


OS Beijing2008 25 9 6 10 8 13 12 9 10 330

AIS European Hub

Clear, challenging targets for the national elite sport –

so called stretch goals

Norway „Continuity, quality, creativity“

Rank 1-3 in total medal ranking in Vancouver 2010Rank 1-5 in total medal ranking in the Paralympics 2010Winning 10 medals in the 2008 Olympic Games in Beij ingWinning 16 medals in the Paralympics 2008Keeping the actual level of performance in the non- Olympic sports regarding the total number of medals won in international championships.

Germany

Rank 1-5 in toal medal ranking in London 2012 with more medals than 2008

Rank 1-3 in total medal ranking in Sochi 2014


New ZealandHigh Performance Strategy

10 or more Olympic medals in London 2012

18 Paralympic medals in London 2012

Great Britain – Mission 2012No-Compromise-Strategy

Rank 4 in the London 2012 Olympic Games with more medals in more sports than in 2008

Rank 2 with at least 103 medals in the 2012 Paralympics

Canada – Own the podium Winter - Rank 1 resp. to the number of medals won (3 0-35) in Vancouver - Rank 1-3 in medal ranking in the Paralympics 2010Summer - Rank among TOP12 in medal ranking in London 2012 - Rank among TOP8 in medal ranking in the Paralympics 2012

Challenging goals – realistic goalsT

[

Target 12 Result 12 Target 08 Result 08 Target 04 Result 04Badminton 0-1 1 1Archery 0-1 2 1 1Boxing 3-5 3 2 3 1Fencing 0-1

Year Rank Gold Silver Bronze∑

Medals4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

∑

1.-8.Efficiencyquotient

1996 36. 1 8 6 15 8 11 2 7 6 492000 10. 11 10 7 28 12 9 10 7 8 74 5,64

2004 10. 9 9 12 30 11 14 9 17 6 87 5,84 2008 4. 19 13 15 47 9 8 18 13 14 109 9,32 2010-2012

4. 21 28 14 63 16 20 12 13 7 131

2012 3. 29 17 19 65 8 32 14 12 15 146 13,10

CrisisCrisisCrisisCrisis

Fencing 0-1Gymnastics 1-2 4 1 1 3Hockey 1-2 1Judo 0-1 2 2 2-3Caoening – Flatwater 3-4 2 2 2 2 1Canoeslalom 2 1 2Athletics 5-8 6 5 4 5-7 4Modern Pentathlon 1-2 1 1 1 1 1Cycling 6-10 12 6 14 5-6 4Equestrian 3-4 5 3 2 2 3Rowing 6 9 4 6 3 4Shooting 0-1 1 2 3Swimming 5-7 3 3 6 2 2Sailing 3-5 5 4 6 3 5Taekwondo 1-3 2 1 1 2Tennis 2Triathlon 1-2 2 1 2Diving 1-3 1 1 2 1Gesamt 40-68 65 41 47 38-42 30

17 Sports 4 Sports H. Sandner – Governance and management in elite sport – INSEP 2013

Challenging goals – realistic goalsT

[

Target 12 Result 12 Target 08 Result 08 Target 04 Result 04Badminton 0-1 1 1Archery 0-1 2 1 1Boxing 3-5 3 2 3 1Fencing 0-1

Target Gold

Max. Target - Total 2012 Result Gold 2012 Result Total

Athletics 2 8 1 8Badminton 1

Boxing 2

Cycling 3 8 1 6Diving 1 3

Equestrian 2 5 2 4Fencing 2 4 2Football 1

Gymnastics 1 4 3Handball 1 2

Hockey 1 1 1 1Judo 2 4 4

Germany‘stargets andresults in London 2012


Fencing 0-1Gymnastics 1-2 4 1 1 3Hockey 1-2 1Judo 0-1 2 2 2-3Caoening – Flatwater 3-4 2 2 2 2 1Canoeslalom 2 1 2Athletics 5-8 6 5 4 5-7 4Modern Pentathlon 1-2 1 1 1 1 1Cycling 6-10 12 6 14 5-6 4Equestrian 3-4 5 3 2 2 3Rowing 6 9 4 6 3 4Shooting 0-1 1 2 3Swimming 5-7 3 3 6 2 2Sailing 3-5 5 4 6 3 5Taekwondo 1-3 2 1 1 2Tennis 2Triathlon 1-2 2 1 2Diving 1-3 1 1 2 1Gesamt 40-68 65 41 47 38-42 30

17 Sports 4 Sports

Judo 2 4 4Caoening – Flatwater

37 3 6

Canoeslalom 2 2Modern Pentathlon 1

Rowing 4 6 2 3Sailing 2

Shooting 2 5

Swimming 2 8 1Taekwondo 2 1Tabletennis 1 2Triathlon 1

Volleyball 1 2 1 1Waterpolo 1

Weigtlifting 1 1

Wrestling 3

Total 28 86 11 44

Transparency and trust

Every four months public presentation of the state of sport specific performance level against the plans and agreements

Traffic light system – based on 32 items in the fields

Athletes – their performance, development, health and well-being System – the places, structures, processes, people and expertise that deliver the programmeClimate – the feel, functionality and elite sport culture experienced by athletes, staff and partners


Regular performance assessment by UK Sport together with the NGBs

Governance – government

no longer a compeititon between social systems

today (again) it is a compeititon between countries (NOCs)

Boris Johnson‘s Victory Parade Speech

The most successful team of athletes this country has ever assembled… You brought sport home to a city and a


country has ever assembled…

Above all you brought home the truth about us and about this country – that when we put our mindes to it there is no limit to what Britain can achieve…

You showed every child in this country that success is not just about talent and luck but about grit and guts and hard work and coming back…

You brought this country together in a way we never expected…

You brought sport home to a city and a country where by and large it was invented and codified, you brought home athletics, you brought home rowing, you brought home cycling…

You have made everybody very proud. You have given hope for the future!

You did rack up more medals than France, didn‘t you? And more medals than Germany and more medals than Australia, more medals, per head than virtually any country on Earth…

Legal status of national elite sport organisations

governmental agency, strategic investor NOC and sport umbrella

organisation at the same time

National Olympic Committee


not-for-profit, independent multisport organisation

part of NOK and NSFindependent elite sport organisation, based on elite sport law wholly owned subsidiary of Sport

New Zealand, the Crown agency for sport

NOC and sport umbrella organisation at the same tim e

Development of professional, effective, often centralized structures for elite sport support

Situation before restructuring:

„Respectable officials were in power, the daily elite sport was managed and controlled by more or less qualified board members, often without continuity and also often without elite

Example Norway Example Great Britain

Situation before restructuring:

Regional sport organisations being responsible for elite sport support together with NGBs, insufficient funding, no elite sport strategy, no scientific support


continuity and also often without elite sport competence.“

Situation after restructuring:

„the logics of elite sport requested a stronger professionalisation, systematisation and more scientific support in high-performance sport, it was necessary to strengthen the basic conditions of the whole elite sport framework and to bring together competences“ Source: Stensbol (2009)

scientific support

Situation after restructuring:

UK Sport as governmental agency and strategic partner (strategic investor) of the British sport department professionalisation, systematisation (no-compromise-strategy) and more scientific support (EIS as UK Sport body) in high-performance sport

Relations with research institutions


Funding on a high, necessary level for targeted elite sport development

It is not enough to look for an ever higher efficiency, an increased optimization and expertise. The international competition is getting harder and harder. We seem to be in a fatal circle of optimization, already today Norway is winning the cheapest medals.Jarle Aambø (Head Olympiatoppen) There is no escape from the

necessity of significantly increased financial funds

Never before so much money and know-how has been invested into elite sport…We want to keep our approach of supporting all Olympic sports - to secure our

increased financial funds for elite sport, if Australia wants to keep its international competitiveness in international elite sport.John Coates (AOC-president)

Top performances are no cheap low budget product. To climb the podium three tasks have to be solved. The responsible national organisations have to do their homework, coaching has to be on international top level and we need to have hungry, motivated athletes.Sebastian Coe (Olympic Champion, BOA-President)


secure our international competitiveness among the leading top nations in elite sport within our approach increased funding is required as competition has become much harder. (German Olympic Sport Confederation)

Funding sources of national elite sport

UK Sport budget 2009-2013

Fiscal year National Lottery (in Mio. Euro)

Exchequer(in Mio. Euro)

Total(in Mio. Euro)

Team 2012 (in Mio. Euro.)

2004/05 26,50 29,20 55,702005/06 27,20 37,10 64,302006/07 67,50 67,30 134,802007/08 62,50 85,20 147,702008/09 62,82 91,07 153,892009/10 78,95 71,34 150,29

8,22010/11 74,84 69,87 144,662011/12 88,35 76,50 164,85

2004-1012 funding by DCMS and Team 2012 (in Mio. Euro)


Funding sources of national elite sport

year Department ofInterior Affairs (in

Mio. Euro)

Department of Defence(in Mio. Euro)

Total(in Mio. Euro)

German Sports Aid (in Mio.

Euro)2011 132.859 31.474 164.333 10.02012 131.699 32.879 164.569 12.52013 129.156 32.129 161.285

German public elite sport funding 2011-2013


Fiscal year National Lottery (in Mio. Euro)

Exchequer(in Mio. Euro)

Total(in Mio. Euro)

Team 2012 (in Mio. Euro.)

2004/05 26,50 29,20 55,702005/06 27,20 37,10 64,302006/07 67,50 67,30 134,802007/08 62,50 85,20 147,702008/09 62,82 91,07 153,892009/10 78,95 71,34 150,29

8,22010/11 74,84 69,87 144,662011/12 88,35 76,50 164,85

2004-1012 funding by DCMS and Team 2012 (in Mio. Euro)

Determination of targeted sports

Australian sport minister: As well as maintaining o ur current mix of sports , we need to target particular sports in which have the greatest chance of success .

Russian sport minister: „… we should not loose the traditionally strong Russian sports – biathlon, cross-country skiing, figure skating, ic e hockey and speed skating – but we should regain a powerful position in these sports.“

Canada - Sport Excellence Strategy 2005: …the targeted support of sports


Canada - Sport Excellence Strategy 2005: …the targeted support of sports with medal potential with a remaining basic support for the other sports

UK Sport Chief Executive - We invest in the medal potential sports and we have got limited investment. .. Sports capable of winning me dals in 2016 will get "podium" level funding while those on track to qualify for t he Games will be funded at a lower level. Those that cannot show they will qualify wil l see their funding cut entirely.

High Performance New Zealand – To produce more NZ wi nners on the world stage nine sports receive 70 % of the funding available. Board decide d to continue the strategy of investing in sports and at hletes who had the best opportunity to succeed at the London Games.


German Olympic Sport Confederation Board - We do not dr aw the conclusion to focus on thesuccessul disciplines. According to the German sport cul ture we want to keep the support for the whole variety of Olympic sports to secure our international competitiveness. To do this an increased funding is required to defend our position in a harder competition with other nations .

H. Sandner – Governance and management in elite sport – INSEP 2013H. Sandner – Governance and management in elite sport – INSEP 2013

increased funding is required to defend our position in a harder competition with other nations . If this will not be possible or the funding level even decre ases the German sport quickly wouldhave the alternatives either to slide to mediocrety in man y sports or to focus on selected sportsto remain in the international top with them. For the Ge rman Olympic Sports Confederation bothalternatives are unacceptable.


Skiing,

Swimming, Rowing, T/F, Sailing, Canoe,

BasketballT/F, Gymnastics, Rhythm. Gymnastics, Synchronized

Sw., Wrestling, Boxing -Biathlon, CC-Skiing, Figure

Skating,Ice Hockey

Swimming, T/F, Gymnastics, Beach-

Volleyball, Basketball,Rowing - Skating,

Freestyle, Ice Hockey,Snowboard

ALL SPORTS


Gymnastics, Diving, Table Tennis, Weightlifting, Badminton,

Shooting – Skating, Freestyle

Cycling, Rowing, Swimming, Sailing, T/F – Skeleton

Judo, Gymnastics, Wrestling, Swimming –

Skating

Skiing, Biathlon, Curling -Rowing, Handball

Rowing - Skating, Ice Hockey,

Freestyle, Curling, Snowboard

ALL SPORTS

Sport Support level/ % of 100

Olympic cycle1997-2000




Archery 3/1,67 - 1.013.354,9 3.589.809,9 5.583.585,8Athletics 1/9,52 13.426.953,2 14.440.308,2 33.583.850,2 31.759.811,2

Badminton 3/2,81 - - 1.1094.970,1 9.410.140,8Basketball -/3,26 - - 4.679.166,5 10.861.898,5Boxing 2/3,62 - - 6.339.802,0 12.087.298,0Canoeing 2/6,12 5.700.121,6 5.953.460,4 17.254.901,6 20.471.923,6Cycling 1/9,86 6.840.146,0 10.893.565,8 28.058.532,2 33.428.426,9

Diving 3/2,47 1.140.024,3 1.773.371,2 7.439.292,1 8.263.529,7Equestrian 2/5,07 3.800.081,1 5.573.452,3 14.854.517,1 16.951.021,8Fencing -/0,96 - - 3.893.816,4 3.191.225,8Gymnastics (incl.Trampolin)

2/4,08 7.473.492,8 5.193.444,2 11.445.844,3 13.620.250,7

5 GB-NGBs got appr. 10 % each of the toalfinancial support – per association 29-33 Mio. Euro

Elite sport funding for British NGSs

Handball -/1,11 - - 3.782.347,4 3.669.258,2Hockey -/5,68 - - 12.517.467,2 18.976.591,7Judo 3/2,84 4.940.105,4 5.193.444,2 8.799.721,1 9.480.062,3Mod. Pentathlon 3/2,38 1.393.363,1 2.533.387,4 7.498.826,7 7.960.916,6Rowing 1/10,3 12.160.259,5 13.426.953,2 32.987.237,4 34.505.623,2

Sailing 1/8,69 6.460.137,9 9.626.872,1 28.237.136,1 29.040.979,9Shooting -/0,93 - 1.773.371,2 6.404.403,3 3.104.496,5Swimming 1/9,52 8.740.186,5 8.106.839,7 26.168.625,2 31.789.705,2Synchro. Swim. -/1,29 - - 2.087.511,2 4.293.205,0Tabletennis -/0,46 - - 3.208.535,1 1.529.973,4Taekwondo 3/1,83 760.016,2 760.016,2 3.378.272,1 6.117.623,9Tennis -/- - - - -Triathlon 3/2,0 1.773.371,2 3.293.403,6 6.476.604,9 6.694.729,5Waterpolo -/1,11 - - 3.986.285,1 3.675.994,5Weightlifting -/0,52 - 380.008,1 2.135.645,6 1.722.902,3Volleyball -/1,34 - - 5.208.644,5 4.443.659,0Wrestling -/0,54 - - 2.691.724,1 1.817.971,4Total 74.608.259,2 88.668.559,3 297.803.490,1 334.452.8 06,2

8 GB-NGBs got less than 10 % of the total financial support together - 31,7 Mio. Euro


Funding for British and New Zealand NGSs

UKS – Sport (inMio. Euro)

Support level / % of

100



Olympiccycle 2004-

2008


Athletics 9,52 13,426 14,440 33,583 31,759Cycling 9,86 6,840 10,893 28,058 33,428Rowing 10,3 12,160 13,426 32,987 34,505Sailing 8,69 6,460 9,626 28,237 29,040Swimming 9,52 8,740 8,106 26,168 31,789 Total 74,608 88,668 297,803 334,452

5 GB-NGBs gotappr. 10 % eachof the toalfinancialsupport – per association 29-33 Mio. Euro


9 NZL-NGBs got 70 % of all funding

NZL - Sport

(in Mio. Euro)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2009-2012

Cycling 2,1438 2,7163 3,1129 3,5846 11,5583

Rowing 2,3897 2,1734 3,4131 4,1174 12,0942

Athletics 1,0738 0,9319 1,2144 1,3626 4,5883

Sailing 1,6633 1,4464 1,9376 2,0757 7,1237

Triathlon 1,0908 0,9862 1,1614 1,1305 4,3708

Total 11,3193 11,6707 14,3118 17,9392 55,3316

Contribution of targeted sports

British medals in the Olympic Games 1996

Gold Silver Bronze

Medal contribution of the top NGBs


Cycling 0 0 2

Rowing 1 0 1

Sailing 0 2 0

Athletics 0 4 2

Swimming 0 1 1

Total 1996 1 of 1 7 of 8 6 of 6



Gold Silver Bronze


Gold Silver Bronze

Cycling 8 4 2



Cycling 0 0 2

Rowing 1 0 1

Sailing 0 2 0

Athletics 0 4 2

Swimming 0 1 1

Total 1996 1 of 1 7 of 8 6 of 6

Rowing 2 2 2

Sailing 4 1 1

Athletics 1 2 1

Swimming 2 2 2

Total 2008 17 of 19 11 of 13 8 of 15



Gold Silver Bronze


Gold Silver Bronze

Cycling 8 4 2


Gold Silver Bronze

Cycling 8 2 2

Rowing 4 2 3



Cycling 0 0 2

Rowing 1 0 1

Sailing 0 2 0

Athletics 0 4 2

Swimming 0 1 1

Total 1996 1 of 1 7 of 8 6 of 6

Rowing 2 2 2

Sailing 4 1 1

Athletics 1 2 1

Swimming 2 2 2

Total 2008 17 of 19 11 of 13 8 of 15

Sailing 1 4

Athletics 4 1 1

Swimming 1 2

Total 2012 17 of 29 10 of 17 8 of 19



Gold Silver Bronze


Gold Silver Bronze

Cycling 8 4 2


Gold Silver Bronze

Cycling 8 2 2

Rowing 4 2 3


53%

H. Sandner – Governance and management in elite sport – INSEP 2013H. Sandner – Governance and management in elite sport – INSEP 2013

Cycling 0 0 2

Rowing 1 0 1

Sailing 0 2 0

Athletics 0 4 2

Swimming 0 1 1

Total 1996 1 of 1 7 of 8 6 of 6

Rowing 2 2 2

Sailing 4 1 1

Athletics 1 2 1

Swimming 2 2 2

Total 2008 17 of 19 11 of 13 8 of 15

Sailing 1 4

Athletics 4 1 1

Swimming 1 2

Total 2012 17 of 29 10 of 17 8 of 19

53%TOP 5 sports

35 medals17 G - 10 S – 8 B

Medal share of the TOP5 sports

61,5%TOP 5 sports

21 medals

53%TOP 5 sports

35 medals

TOP 5 sportsUSA 71,5 %

China 48,9 %Russia 59,8 %Japan 76,3 %

Australia 77,1 %Korea 71,4 %


61%TOP 5 sports

30 medals7 G - 13 S - 10 B

21 medals10 G - 5 S - 6 B

35 medals17 G - 10 S – 8 B

Planning for performance - planning for success?

0,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

00-04 04-08 08-12 00-04 04-08 08-12 00-04 04-08 08-12 00-04 04-08 08-12 00-04 04-08 08-12

Kanu-Rennsport LA-Lauf/Gehen Schwimmen Triathlon Rudern

0,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

1 2 3

OZ Sommer

Rüc

ksta

nd (i

n %

)

Olympic cycles 2000-2012 canoeing athletics swimming triathlon rowing


Development of performance density in selected endurance sports (∅ rank 1-3, Olympic events, men) in three Olympic cycles

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1,0

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1,0

Rüc

ksta

nd (i

n %

)

Difference to winning performance > 0,4 % = no medal

Wick,2012

In which fields do successful nation invest to become resp. remain successful?

International training and international competitio n (including the final stage of preparation to adapt to the climatic and regional (jetlag) condititions

Excellent home training facilities, but also abroad as the core element of performance development (multi-sport fa cilities as well as sport specific facilities)

To offer athletes professional living and training conditions as fulltime athletes during several years in accor dance with as fulltime athletes during several years in accor dance with school and academic education as well as job train ing

Medical and scientific support as a key element in the long-term preparation of athletes with access to multidi sicplinary teams of experts (as training science, strength and conditioning, biomechanics, sportpsychology, sports medicin, physiotherapy, performance and nutrition, performan ce and lifestyle)

World-class coaching - NGBs performance directors w ith their coaches understand all aspects of performance (development), they co-ordinate the pre paration of the athletes to make sure that the athletes and the sport equipment perform on interna tional top level when it is required – in the Olympi c or World final – they manage and control the expert teams


386 days left 1.296 days left


Thank you for your attention!

Institute for Applied Training Science

Marschnerstraße 29, 04109 Leipzig

Germany

Dr. Hartmut Sandner

Head of Department Information Communication Sport

E-Mail: [email protected]

Tel.: + 49 341 4945 - 133

Fax: + 49 341 4945 - 400

Date post:	05-Jul-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	doantuong
View:	220 times
Download:	0 times

Governance systems and management practice in ... · Governance systems and management practice in...

Documents