U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONNOTICE OF GRANT/ASSISTANCE AWARD

1. GRANT/AGREEMENT NO. 2. MO 3. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 4. AUTHORITYNRC-38-10-927 FROM: 5/1/2010 TO: 4/30/2013 Pursuant to Section 31b and 141b of the

_Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended5. TYPE OF AWARD 6. ORGANIZATION TYPE 7. RECIPIENT NAME, ADDRESS, and EMAIL ADDRESS

The University of TennesseeGRANT Public State-Controlled Institution of Higher ED 1534 White Avenue

D COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Knoxville, TN 37996-1529

8. PROJECT TITLE:

University of Tennessee Faculty Development Program

9. PROJECT WILL BE CONDUCTED 10. TECHNICAL REPORTS ARE REQUIRED 11. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR(S) NAME, ADDRESS and EMAIL ADDRESS

PER GOVERNMENT'S/RECIPIENT'S PROGRESS AND FINAL The University of TennesseePROPOSAL(S) DATED LAttn: Dr. H. Lee Dodds

See Program Description D FINAL ONLY Professor and Head of the .Engineering DepartmentEmail: hdj@utk.edu

AND APPENDIX A-PROJECT D OTHER (Conference Proceedings) 865-914-2525GRANT PROVISIONS L12. NRC PROGRAM OFFICE (NAME and ADDRESS) 13. ACCOUNTING and APPROPRIATION DATA 14. METHOD OF PAYMENT

NRC APPN. NO: 31X0200 D ADVANCE BY TREASURY CHECKAttn: John Gutteridge B&R NO: 0-8415-5C1115Office of Human Resources REIMBURSEMENT BY TREASURY CHECKMS: GW5A6 (301) 492-2313 JOB CODE: T846011545 Rockville Pike BOC NO: 4110 D LETTEROFCREDITRockville, MD 20852 OFFICE ID NO: RFPA: HR-10-922 [] OTHER (SPECIFY) Electronic ASAP.gov

I_ See Remarks in Item #20 "Payment Information")15. NRC OBLIGATION FUNDS 16. TOTAL FUNDING AGREEMENT

This action provides funds for Fiscal YearTHIS ACTION $316.578.00 NRC $316.578.00 in the amount of See Paae Two

PREVIOUS OBLIGATION RECIPIENT $ 16,578.00

TOTAL $316.578.00 TOTAL $333.156.00

17. NRC ISSUING OFFICE (NAME, ADDRESS and EMAIL ADDRESS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionDiv. of ContractsAttn: Sheila BumpassMail Stop: TWB-01-BlOMRockville MD 20852

18. 19. NRC CONT OFFIC

Signature Not Required i e /........(Sign ure) a

NAME (TYP Sheila Bum ss

TITLE Contracting Officer

TELEPHONE NO. 301-492-3484

20. PAYMENT INFORMATION

Payment will be made through the Automated Standard Application for Payment (ASAP.gov) unless the recipient has failed to comply with the program objectives,award conditions, Federal reporting requirements or other conditions specified in 2 CFR 215 (OMB Circular Al 10).

21. Attached is a copy of the "NRC General Provisions for Grants and Cooperative Agreements Awarded to Non-Govemment Recipients.

Acceptance of these terms and conditions is acknowledged when Federal funds are used on this project.

22. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

In the event of a conflict between the recipient's proposal and this award, the terms of the Award shall prevail.

23. By this award, the Recipient certifies that payment of any audit-related debt will not reduce the level of performance of any Federal Program.

AMR -AN601 SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE SEP 1 5 2010

ATTACHMENT A - SCHEDULE

A.1 PURPOSE OF GRANT

The purpose of this Grant is to provide support to the "University of Tennessee FacultyDevelopment Program" as described in Attachment B entitled "Program Description."

A.2 PERIOD OF GRANT -

1. The effective date of this Grant is May 1, 2010. The estimated completion date of this Grantis April 30, 2013.

2. Funds obligated hereunder are available for program expenditures for the estimated period:May 1, 2010 - April 30, 2013.

A. GENERAL1. Total Estimated NRC Amount:2. Total Obligated Amount:3. Cost-Sharing Amount:4. Activity Title:

5. NRC Project Officer:6. DUNS No.:

B. SPECIFICRFPA No.:FFS:Job Code:BOC:B&R Number:Appropriation #:Amount Obligated:

$316,578$316,578$ 16,578University of Tennessee FacultyDevelopment ProgramJohn Gutteridge003387891

HR-10-927N/AT846041100-8415-5C1 11531X0200$316,578

A.3 BUDGET

Revisions to the budget shall be made in accordance with Revision of Grant Budget inaccordance with 2 CFR 215.25.

NRC"ry ijTotal> $05,374 $15,4 $105,562

All travel must be in accordance with the University of Tennessee Travel Regulations or the USGovernment Travel Policy absent Grantee's travel regulation.

A.4 AMOUNT OF AWARD AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES

1. The total estimated amount of this Award is $316,578 for the three year period.

2. NRC hereby obligates the amount of $316,578 for program expenditures during the periodset forth above and in support of the Budget above. The Grantee will be given written notice bythe Contracting Officer when additional funds will be added. NRC is not obligated to reimbursethe Grantee for the expenditure of amounts in excess of the total obligated amount.

3. Payment shall be made to the Grantee in accordance with procedures set forth in theAutomated Standard Application For Payments (ASAP) Procedures set forth below.

Attachment B - Program Description

The Faculty Development Program at the University of Tennessee

Executive Summary

The Faculty Development Program at the University of Tennessee (UT) will attract a new tenuretrack assistant professor and help the new faculty member succeed in his/her career with theNuclear Engineering Department. The program will be administered by Dr. H. Lee Dodds,Professor and Head of the Nuclear Engineering Department (hdj@utk.edu, 865-974-2525), withthe assistance of Dr. Haitao Liao, Assistant Professor of the department (hliaO4@utk.edu, 865-974-0984). The objective of this program is to recruit and retain a new highly qualified juniorfaculty member as an addition to the growing UT Nuclear Engineering Department and promotehis/her outreach activities and teaming up with the other junior faculty members recentlyemployed in the department to achieve excellence in both research and teaching. Therequested budget is $316,578 over a 3-year period. This budget includes the support forsummer salary of the new faculty member, graduate assistant, development of new courses andresearch proposals, participation in professional society meetings, inviting leading researchersfrom universities, NRC, national laboratories and utilities for seminar deliveries and brainstormmeetings, and other startup costs. The benefit of this program to the university and to the nationwill be an enhanced capability of the Nuclear Engineering Department to meet the nation's needto train a new generation of nuclear engineers and health physicists.

The Faculty Development Program at the University of Tennessee

Faculty Development Program Description

The UT Nuclear Engineering (UTNE) Department has almost tripled its student enrollmentrecently, from a total of 82 students in 1992 to 240 students in 2009. Currently, UTNE becomesthe third largest Nuclear Engineering program in the U.S. based on the total studentenrollment. To accommodate the growth, we have added four new faculty members in the pastyears, giving us a total of 12 tenure/tenure track faculty members. To meet the nation's need totrain a new generation of nuclear engineers and health physicists, the university has providedUTNE with additional faculty line positions. Our ongoing faculty search has identified fourstrong candidates with broad research areas in: nuclear non-proliferation and safeguards,radiation measurement and calibration, radiological safety, radiation shielding, and reactorphysics. The University of Tennessee's Faculty Development Program (FOP) will become animportant factor that attracts the candidates and helps the selected candidate succeed inhis/her career with UTNE.

The FOP is developed to retain the new tenure track assistant professor and promotehis/her outreach activities and teaming up with the other four junior faculty members recentlyemployed in the department to achieve excellence in both research and teaching. Specifically,the FOP described below focuses on the following components: (1) faculty development in thethrust areas of teaching and research; (2) the faculty evaluation process; (3) the facultyselection process being used to hire the new faculty member and how it relates to the success

we expect from the proposed program; and (4) program management and administration.

(1) Faculty Development

In this proposal, the primary areas of support for the new faculty member are: (a) newcourse development, (b) development of research proposals, (c) preparation of researchpapers for publication, and (d) outreach and teaming-up activities. We expect that these fourareas will be the major effort taken by the new faculty member over the 3-year period of thisprogram. In addition to these activities, the FOP will also provide support for a graduateresearch assistant, participation in professional society meetings, and additional travel neededfor other scholarly activities.

(a) Course development

The following courses are in an ongoing revision and will use the FOP support:undergraduate Nuclear and Radiological Engineering Laboratories I (NE 304) and II (NE 403),Principles of Health Physics (NE 433), Nuclear Reactor Theory (NE 470), Introduction toReliability Engineering (NE 483), the graduate Radiation Measurements Laboratory (NE 550),and graduate Process System Reliability and Safety (NE 585). Furthermore, the following newcourses will be developed using the FOP support: Introduction to Nuclear Engineering for Non-majors (NE 300 level), Advanced Radiation Measurements (NE 500 level), and NeutronDetection Methods and Analysis (NE 500 level). These efforts are currently being taken mainlyby the four junior faculty members recently employed, and the new faculty member will play animportant role by teaming up with them in developing and optimizing the teaching capabilitiesof our department. The program administrator, Dr. H. Lee Dodds, and his assistant, Dr. HaitaoLiao, will provide their assistance in this regard. In addition, course revision and new coursecreation will allow the new faculty to incorporate more new, cutting edge research in curriculaby utilizing the strengths being brought to our department. This, in turn, will attract and retainstudents in the NE program.

(b) Development of proposals

It is always a challenge for junior faculty to attract external research funding. At theUniversity of Tennessee, our faculty members' ability to obtain external research funding is acritical component in their retention through the tenure process. Moreover, their research is avital component of their abilities to teach and train both undergraduate and graduate students.Research is a tool that the department uses to keep our training up-to-date and relevant to thenation's current needs. The program administrator and the assistant will help the new facultymember identify various sources for external research funding applicable to his/her area ofresearch. To help the new faculty member prepare proposals, the department will contribute tothe faculty member's success through internal review of research grant proposals, asappropriate. The college will also contribute through internal review and assistance in proposalsubmission to the appropriate agencies. The new faculty will take advantage of these so thathis/her research can be started and advanced smoothly.

(c) Preparation of research papers

The publication of high quality research papers is another key component in our facultymembers' ability to attain tenure. Our department strongly encourages and helps our faculty topublish in major journals, thereby. increasing the visibility of the faculty and the department inthe science and engineering communities, as well as increasing our ability to attract and retainhigh quality students. The department will conduct an internal review of research papers, asappropriate, and the college also offers assistance in the preparation of those papers. The FOPwill allow the niew faculty member to spend more time working with graduate researchassistants and peer faculty in this regard.

(d) Outreach and teaming-up activities

To build research reputation, outreach and teaming-up activities are highly appreciated inour department. In particular, junior faculty members are encouraged to invite outsideresearchers to present colloquiums and have discussions about new ideas in nuclear scienceand technologies. To foster such activities, the department will provide fund for the newfaculty member to invite leading researchers from other universities, NRC, nationallaboratories and utilities through the FOP. In addition, the faculty member may work withother junior faculty within the department to jointly invite researchers for brainstorm meetingsleading to collaborative research opportunities. We believe that such outreach activities willhelp the new faculty member establish connections and publicize his/her research expertisein the NE community to advance research frontiers.

(e) Other developmental support

Other support is needed to allow our new faculty to become established in his/her areas ofexpertise, conduct research, and pass tenure review while alleviating the added pressure ofproducing full, externally funded support in the process. To this end, the FOP funds will be usedto support a graduate research assistant for the new faculty. This support provides the newfaculty member with personnel required for success in both teaching and research. The FOPwill also provide the support for the new faculty member to attend professional conferences andmake important connections in government, industry, and academia, as they deem appropriate.

(2) Faculty Evaluation Process

The goal of this program is to aid in the retention of the new junior faculty member. Thesuccessful retention depends greatly on how the junior faculty performs in the evaluationprocess, which will be formally conducted on an annual basis by the program administrator.The goal of this evaluation is to provide feedback to the junior faculty on the progress inmeeting the high expectations for tenure in the College of Engineering. These expectationsinclude consistent and demonstrated success in: teaching, measured by student evaluationsand peer review; research and scholarship, measured by publications in highly respected peerreviewed journals, the ability of the faculty member to bring in external funded researchprojects; research administration, measured by the success in graduating Masters and Ph.D.students; and service to the department, the university, the scientific community, andprofessional societies. Furthermore, awards in teaching, research, and service are alsoconsidered. The goal of the FOP is to ensure that the high quality NE faculty is developed andretained in the tenure process. As such, the evaluation criteria of the FOP will be the same asthey are for the tenure process. Progress reports of the FOP will summarize the facultymember's performance towards tenure. An excerpt from the "Guidelines for the Tenure andPromotion Review Process" are attached in the Appendix.

Faculty retention at the University of Tennessee Nuclear Engineering Department isexcellent because faculty members are only selected if it is deemed that the probability thatthey will succeed is very high (see section 3 for our faculty selection process). Furthermore,faculty members choose to stay for the same reasons that attracted them to the department:academic reputation, opportunities in research at a nearby national laboratory, many lures ofthe Knoxville-Oak Ridge area, a very positive working environment, and competitive facultysalaries. By retaining highly qualified, well developed professors, we achieve the goal of theFOP over the long-term: that UT may be better equipped to meet the nation's need to train anew generation of nuclear engineers and health physicists.

(3) Faculty selection process

This section describes the process we have been using to select new faculty members. It

is important to note the close connection between the criteria used in this process and in theevaluation process (section 2). In this way, we hope to maximize the effectiveness of our newfaculty member, as well as maximize our ability to retain the person through the tenureprocess.

The new faculty member to be funded under this proposal will be carefully selected fromthe current candidates. When selecting our new faculty, the department focuses on: (1) theprospective candidates' recent records in the areas of research, (2) publication track records,(3) teaching/training, and (4) professional services. As will be seen in this section, these areasare also critical components of the faculty member's ability to achieve tenure. We feel ourdepartment has selected new faculty that have outstanding records in all the four areas, givingus the best chance of successfully developing new faculty members. To highlight oursuccessful faculty selection process, a brief description of each of our four junior facultymembers recently employed in the department is provided next. This demonstrates the highsuccess rate we are expecting for our new faculty.

Dr. G. Ivan Maldonado joined the Nuclear Engineering Department in Fall of 2007 as anAssociate Professor under a joint appointment with Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).His impressive past experience and performance record speaks to the quality of facultymembers that this department is able to attract. Dr. Maldonado has been affiliated with the USnuclear industry for about 20 years. He began his nuclear engineering career in naval reactorcore design with GE KAPL back in 1985. Subsequently, he obtained a Master's and Ph.D.degree in nuclear engineering from NC State University (1993). His doctoral research innuclear fuel management optimization led to a postdoctoral position with Electricite de Francein Paris. Upon his return to the US in 1994, he joined Iowa State University as an AssistantProfessor. In 1999, he joined GE Nuclear Energy as a Technical Program Manager, and in2003 he rejoined academics as an Associate Professor with the University of Cincinnati'sNuclear and Radiological Engineering Program. Dr. Maldonado is a former NSF CAREERwinner as well as a current DOE NERI award recipient. He is a leader in securing externallyfunded research, and has received a number of honors, as well as teaching awards. He is alsoinvolved in private consulting, as a reviewer for many professional journals and DOE researchproposals. Furthermore, Dr. Maldonado keeps himself and his student's active in the publishingarena.

Dr. Jason Hayward joined the department as an Assistant Professor in January 2008, alsounder a joint appointment with ORNL. Dr. Hayward is a recent graduate of the top NuclearEngineering graduate program in the nation in 2007, the University of Michigan. Additionally,Dr. Hayward was designated as the top graduate student in the department in 2007, and hecame highly recommended from some of the top scientists in his field. His researchbackground is in the area of radiation detection and measurements. Dr. Hayward also hasexperience in nuclear reactor operations, stemming from his service as a Naval officer from1998-2003. We were able to attract Dr. Hayward to the department due to our reputable,growing NE program, and due to the opportunity provided for him to work alongside topscientists in his field at ORNL. At UT, we are uniquely positioned to provide these jointappointments, which leverage university resources, help young faculty members gainmomentum in research and then to establish themselves as experts in their fields.

Dr. Haitao Liao joined the department as an Assistant Professor in August, 2008. He has ajoint appointment in the Nuclear Engineering Department (60%) and in the Department ofIndustrial and Informational Engineering (40%). Dr. Liao received his Ph.D. in Industrial andSystems Engineering from Rutgers University in 2004. From 2005 to 2008 he was an assistantprofessor at Wichita State University before coming to the University of Tennessee. In 2006 hereceived Wichita State's University Research/Creative Projects award. He is the first author

and co-author on numerous journal articles. Since 2005, he has won seven grants and awardsfrom the NSF, DOE, and other agencies. He has a well-established record of professionalservice through editing and reviewing for various journals. Dr. Liao came highly recommendedfrom experts in his field, as well as his associates at Wichita State and Rutgers. We were ableto attract Dr. Liao to the department in part due to our ability to establish joint faculty positionswith other departments here at UT where there is a clear synergy between the two fields. Thishas provided Dr. Liao with the opportunity to form collaborations across departmental lines,which in turn expands his opportunities for research and teaching. Recently, he received theNSF CAREER Award, which is the most prestigious award for junior faculty.Dr. Lawrence Heilbronn joined the department with a full-time appointment as an AssistantProfessor in August, 2008. Dr. Heilbronn received a Ph.D. in experimental nuclear physicsfrom Michigan State University in 1991. From 1991 to 2008, he was a scientist at theDepartment of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. He worked in a numberof radiological health related fields such as radiotherapy for arteriovenus malformations,design of dosimetry systems for accelerator based radiobiology programs, cross sectionmeasurements from heavy-ion interactions, and shielding studies for low-Earth orbit anddeep-space missions. He has published numerous articles, co-authored a book onsecondary particle production from heavy- ion interactions, mentored masters and Ph.D.students, taught at NASA's summer school for radiobiologists, and received twooutstanding performance awards at LBNL. He is one of the world's leading experts onneutron measurements and is recognized internationally for his contributions to the field.Dr. Heilbronn was attracted to the NE department due to its commitment to seeing that itsfaculty members succeed and in its commitment to producing excellent graduates from itsprogram.

The new faculty member will work closely with the four new faculty members inboth research and teaching through this FOP. Such teaming-up activities will bepromoted.

(4) Program Management and Administration

The FOP at the University of Tennessee will be managed by Dr. H. Lee Dodds, IBMProfessor and Head of the Nuclear Engineering Department. As the direct supervisor of all NEfaculty members, Dr. Dodds will guide the supported faculty member through the developmentprogram. Additionally, the new junior faculty member will be assigned a faculty mentor in theNE department. Overall, this departmental administrative structure creates an environmentwhere the junior faculty member is supported and directed where direction is needed.

The College of Engineering will also provide support to the FOP through providing neededsupport to Dr. Dodds and the faculty member. One relevant, important function of collegeadministrators is internal review of all proposals. In this review process, they will assist andhelp train the junior faculty in writing proposals that have a high rate of success.

Institutional capability, support, and commitment to nuclear engineering and science:

The Nuclear Engineering Department at the University of Tennessee is healthy, vibrant,and growing in its 53nd year, having produced over 1000 graduates with B.S.,. M.S., and Ph.D.degrees since its inception. When many nuclear departments dwindled or closed completely inthe last few decades, the UTNE department continued to prosper due to its commitment toexcellence in teaching and research innovation. Continued excellence in research has led toconsistent support from the DOE, NSF,and ORNL, as well as support from the NRC. The NEdepartment is a responsive team player for the NRC and is currently preparing over a half adozen proposals in response to recent FY10 calls by the NRC.

The College of Engineering at the Uriiversity of Tennessee is fully committed to a strong

NE department. The College has consistently supported the NE department in a number ofways. In the fall of 2008, the College awarded the NE department over $88,000 dollars for thepurchase of new laboratory equipment for use in its undergraduate and graduate courses.Because all of the new faculty members recently employed are actively involved with theimprovement of existing lab courses and in the development of new lab courses, those fundsgreatly enhance the probability of their retention in the department. To help support a graduateresearch assistant for the new faculty, the UTNE department will support a graduate student(partial graduate student tuition in the amount of $16,578) for work associated with this projectusing departmental funds. This support is listed in the budget as cost sharing provided by thedepartment.

The University of Tennessee both welcomes and is fully capable to handle the expectedNE program growth. As the program grows, the College of Engineering is prepared to providethe space and other required support, so that the quality of teaching and research is nothindered. The College has welcomed program growth by adding four new faculty positions inthe past two years and providing additional faculty line positions recently. For these newpositions, a substantial portion of the startup funds is coming directly from the University.

Attachment C - Standard Terms and Conditions

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission'sStandard Terms and Conditions for U.S. Nongovernmental Grantees

Preface

This award is based on the application submitted to, and as approved by, the NuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC) under the authorization 42 USC 2051(b) pursuant to section 31 band 141 b of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and is subject to the terms andconditions incorporated either directly or by reference in the following:

* Grant program legislation and program regulation cited in this Notice of Grant Award.* Restrictions on the expenditure of Federal funds in appropriation acts, to the extent

those restrictions are pertinent to the award.* Code of Federal Regulations/Regulatory Requirements - 2 CFR 215 Uniform

Administrative Requirements For Grants And Agreements With Institutions Of HigherEducation, Hospitals, And Other Non-Profit Organizations (OMB Circulars), asapplicable.

To assist with finding additional guidance for selected items of cost as required in 2 CRF 220, 2CFR 225, and 2 CFR 230 these URLs to the Office of Management and Budget Cost Circularsare included for reference:A-21 (now 2CFR 220): http://www.whitehouse.qov/omb/circulars/a021/print/a021.htmlA-87 (now 2CFR 225): http://www.whitehouse.qov/omb/circulars/a087/print/aO87-all.html.A-122 (now2 CFR 230): http://www.whitehouse.qov/omb/circulars/a 1 22/print/a122.htmlA-102, SF 424: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a1 02/print/a102.htmlForm 990: http://www.irs.qov/pub/irs-pdf/i990-ez.pdf

Any inconsistency or conflict in terms and conditions specified in the award will be resolvedaccording to the following order of precedence: public laws, regulations, applicable noticespublished in the Federal Register, Executive Orders (EOs), Office of Management and Budget(OMB) Circulars, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Mandatory Standard Provisions,special award conditions, and standard award conditions.

By drawing funds from the Automated Standard Application for Payment system (ASAP), therecipient agrees to the terms and conditions of an award.

Certifications and representations. These terms incorporate the certifications andrepresentations required by statute, executive order, or regulation that were submitted with theSF424B application through Grants.gov.

I. Mandatory General Requirements,The order of these requirements does not make one requirement more important than any otherrequirement.

1. Applicability of 2 CFR Part 215

a. All provisions of 2 CFR Part 215 and all Standard Provisions attached to thisgrant/cooperative agreement are applicable to the Grantee and to sub-recipients which meet thedefinition of "Grantee" in Part 215, unless a section specifically excludes a sub-recipient fromcoverage. The Grantee and any sub-recipients must, in addition to the assurances made aspart of the application, comply and require each of its sub-awardees employed in the completionof the project to comply with Subpart C of 2 CFR 215 Part 180 and include this term in lower-tier(subaward) covered transactions.

b. Grantees must comply with monitoring procedures and audit requirements in accordancewith OMB Circular A-133. <http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a133 compliance/08/08toc.aspx >

2. Award Package

Grant Performance Metrics:

The Office of Management and Budget requires all Federal Agencies providing funding foreducational scholarships and fellowships as well as other educational related funding to reporton specific metrics. These metrics are part of the Academic Competitiveness Council's (ACC)2007 report and specifically relates to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) curricula.

As part of the FY 2010 HR grant awards, in addition to the customary performance progressreport requested on the SF-PPR, SF-PPR-B, and SF-PPR-E forms, HR requires the followingmetrics to be reported on by the awardees as follows:

Faculty Development Awards

1. Number of new faculty hired and currently eligible faculty supported in NRC designatedSTEM areas.

§ 215.41 Grantee responsibilities.The Grantee is obligated to conduct such project oversight as may be appropriate, to managethe funds with prudence, and to comply with the provisions outlined in 2 CFR 215.41 Withinthis framework, the Principal Investigator (PI) named on the award face page, Block 11, isresponsible for the scientific or technical direction :of the project and for preparation of theproject performance reports. This award is funded on a cost reimbursement basis not to exceed

the amount awarded as indicated on the face page, Block 16., and is subject to a refund ofunexpended funds to NRC.

The standards contained in this section do not relieve the Grantee of the contractualresponsibilities arising under its contract(s). The Grantee is the responsible authority, withoutrecourse to the NRC, regarding the settlement and satisfaction of all contractual andadministrative issues arising out of procurements entered into in support of an award or otheragreement. This includes disputes, claims, protests of award, source evaluation or other mattersof a contractual nature. Matters concerning violation of statute are to be referred to suchFederal, State or local authority as may have proper jurisdiction.

SubgrantsAppendix A to Part 215-Contract Provisions

Sub-recipients, sub-awardees, and contractors have no relationship with NRC under the termsof this grant/cooperative agreement. All required NRC approvals must be directed through theGrantee to NRC. See 2 CFR 215.180 and 215.41.

Nondiscrimination(This provision is applicable when work under the grant/cooperative agreement is performed inthe U.S. or when employees are recruited in the U.S.)

No U.S. citizen or legal resident shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefitsof, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded by thisaward on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, religion, handicap, or sex. The Granteeagrees to comply with the non-discrimination requirements below:

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC §§ 2000d et seq)Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 USC §§ 1681 et seq)Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,as amended (29 USC § 794)The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 USC §§ 6101 et seq)The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC §§ 12101 et seq)Parts II and III of EO 11246 as amended by EO 11375 and 12086.EO 13166, "Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency."Any other applicable non-discrimination law(s).

Generally, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC § 2000e et seq, provides that it shallbe an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discharge any individual or otherwise todiscriminate against an individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privilegesof employment because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.However, Title VII, 42 USC § 2000e-1 (a), expressly exempts from the prohibition againstdiscrimination on the basis of religion, a religious corporation, association, educationalinstitution, or society with respect to the employment of individuals of a particular religion toperform work connected with the carrying on by such corporation, association, educationalinstitution, or society of its activities.

Modifications/Prior ApprovalNRC prior written approval may be required before a Grantee makes certain budgetmodifications or Undertakes particular activities. If NRC approval is required for changes in thegrant or cooperative agreement, it must be requested of, and obtained from, the NRC GrantsOfficer in advance of the change or obligation of funds. All requests for NRC prior approval must

be made, in writing (which includes submission by e-mail), to the designated Grants Specialistand Program Office no later than 30 days before the proposed change. The request must besigned by both the PI and the authorized organizational official. Failure to obtain prior approval,when required, from the NRC Grants Officer may result in the disallowance of costs, terminationof the award, or other enforcement action within NRC's authority.

Lobbying RestrictionsThe Grantee will comply, as applicable, with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employmentactivities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.

The Grantee shall comply with provisions of 31 USC § 1352. This provision generally prohibitsthe use of Federal funds for lobbying in the Executive or Legislative Branches of the FederalGovernment in connection with the award, and requires disclosure of the use of non-Federalfunds for lobbying.

The Grantee receiving in excess of $100,000 in Federal funding shall submit a completedStandard Form (SF) LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," regarding the use of non-Federalfunds for lobbying within 30 days following the end of the calendar quarter in which there occursany event that requires disclosure or that materially affects the accuracy of the informationcontained in any disclosure form previously filed. The Grantee must submit the SF-LLL,including those received from sub-recipients, contractors, and subcontractors, to the GrantsOfficer.

§ 215.13 Debarment And Suspension.The Grantee agrees to notify the Grants Officer immediately upon learning that it or any of itsprincipals:

(1) Are presently excluded or disqualified from covered transactions by any Federal departmentor agency;

(2) Have been convicted within the preceding three-year period preceding this proposal beenconvicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminaloffense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal,State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or Stateantitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification ordestruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, receiving stolen property, makingfalse claims, or obstruction of justice; commission of any other offense indicating a lack ofbusiness integrity or business honesty that seriously and directly affects your presentresponsibility;

(3) Are presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity(Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph(1)(b); and

(4) Have had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause ordefault within the preceding three years.

b. The Grantee agrees that, unless authorized by the Grants Officer, it will not knowingly enterinto any subgrant or contracts under this grant/cooperative agreement with a person or entitythat is included on the Excluded Parties List System (http://epls.arnet.gov).

The Grantee further agrees to include the following provision in any subgrant or contractsentered into under this award:

'Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, and Voluntary Exclusion

The Grantee certifies that neither it nor its principals is presently excluded or disqualified fromparticipation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. The policies andprocedures applicable to debarment, suspension, and ineligibility under NRC-financedtransactions are set forth in 2 CFR Part 180.'

Drug-Free WorkplaceThe Grantee must be in compliance with The Federal Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988. Thepolicies and procedures applicable to violations of these requirements are set forth in 41 USC702.

Implementation of E.O. 13224 -- Executive Order On Terrorist FinancingThe Grantee is reminded that U.S. Executive Orders and U.S. law prohibits transactions with,and the provision of resources and support to, individuals and organizations associated withterrorism. It is the legal responsibility of the Grantee to ensure compliance with these ExecutiveOrders and laws. This provision must be included in all contracts/sub-awards issued under thisgrant/cooperative agreement.Award Grantees must comply with Executive Order 13224, Blocking Property and ProhibitingTransactions with Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism. Informationabout this Executive Order can be found at: www.fas.orq/irp/offdocs/eo/eo-13224.htm.

Procurement Standards. § 215.40Sections 215.41 through 215.48 set forth standards for use by Grantees in establishingprocedures for the procurement of supplies and other expendable property, equipment, realproperty and other services with Federal funds. These standards are furnished to ensure thatsuch materials and services are obtained in an effective manner and in compliance with theprovisions of applicable Federal statutes and executive orders. No additional procurementstandards or requirements shall be imposed by the Federal awarding agencies upon Grantees,unless specifically required by Federal statute or executive order or approved by OMB.

TravelTravel is an appropriate charge to this award and prior authorization for specific trips are notrequired, as long as the trip is identified in the Grantee's original program description andoriginal budget. All other travel, domestic or international, must not increase the total estimatedaward amount. Trips that have not been identified in the approved budget require the writtenprior approval of the Grants Officer.

Travel will be in accordance with the US Government Travel Regulations at:www.gsa.gov/federaltravelrequlation and the per diem rates set forth at: www.gsa.gov/perdiem.

Travel costs to the grant must be consistent with provisions as established in Appendix A to 2CFR 220 (J.53)

Property Management StandardsProperty standards of this award shall follow provisions as established in 2 CFR 215.30.

Equipment procedures shall follow provision established in 2 CFR 215.34.

Procurement StandardsProcurement standards of this award shall follow provisions as established in 2 CFR 215.40.

Intangible and Intellectual PropertyIntangible and intellectual property of this award shall generally follow provisions established in2 CFR 215.36.

Inventions Report - The Bayh-Dole Act (P.L. 96-517) affords Grantees the right to elect titleand retain ownership to inventions they develop with funding under an NRC grant award("subject inventions"). In accepting an award, the Grantee agrees to comply with applicableNRC policies, the Bayh-Dole Act, and its Government-wide implementing regulations found atTitle 37, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 401. A significant part of the regulationsrequire that the Grantee report all subject inventions to the awarding agency (NRC) as well asinclude an acknowledgement of federal support in any patents. NRC participates in the trans-government Interagency Edison system (http://www.iedison.gov) and expects NRC fundingGrantees to use this system to comply with Bayh-Dole and related intellectual property reportingrequirements. The system allows for Grantees to submit reports electronically via the Internet. Inaddition, the invention must be reported in continuation applications (competing or non-competing).

Patent Notification Procedures- Pursuant to EO 12889, NRC is required to notify the owner ofany valid patent covering technology whenever the NRC or its financial assistance Grantees,without making a patent search, knows (or has demonstrable reasonable grounds to know) thattechnology covered by a valid United States patent has been or will be used without a licensefrom the owner. To ensure proper notification, if the Grantee uses or has used patentedtechnology under this award without license or permission from the owner, the Grantee mustnotify the Grants Officer. This notice does not necessarily mean that the Governmentauthorizes and consents to any copyright or patent infringement occurring under the financialassistance.

Data, Databases, and Software - The rights to any work produced or purchased under a NRCfederal financial assistance award are determined by 2 CFR ý215.36. Such works may includedata, databases or software. The Grantee owns any work produced or purchased under a NRCfederal financial assistance award subject to NRC's right to obtain, reproduce, publish orotherwise use the work or authorize others to receive, reproduce, publish or otherwise use thedata for Government purposes.

Copyright - The Grantee may copyright any work produced under a NRC federal financialassistance award subject to NRC's royalty-free nonexclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce,publish or otherwise use the work or authorize others to do so for Government purposes.Works jointly authored by NRC and Grantee employees may be copyrighted but only the partauthored by the Grantee is protected because, under 17 USC § 105, works produced byGovernment employees are not copyrightable in the United States. On occasion, NRC may askthe Grantee to transfer to NRC its copyright in a particular work when NRC is undertaking theprimary dissemination of the work. Ownership of copyright by the Government throughassignment is permitted under 17 USC § 105.

Records retention and access requirements for records of the Grantee shall followestablished provisions in 2 CFR 215.53.

Organizational Prior Approval SystemIn order to carry out its responsibilities for monitoring project performance and for adhering toaward terms and conditions, each Grantee organization shall have a system to ensure thatappropriate authorized officials provide necessary organizational reviews and approvals inadvance of any action that would result in either the performance or modification of an NRCsupported activity where prior approvals are required, including the obligation or expenditure offunds where the governing cost principles either prescribe conditions or require approvals.

The Grantee shall designate an appropriate official or officials to review and approve the actionsrequiring NRC prior approval. Preferably, the authorized official(s) should be the sameofficial(s) who sign(s) or countersign(s) those types of requests that require prior approval byNRC. The authorized organization official(s) shall not be the principal investigator or any officialhaving direct responsibility for the actual conduct of the project, or a subordinate of suchindividual.

Conflict Of Interest Standards of this award shall follow provisions as established in 2 CFR215.42 Codes of Conduct.

Dispute Review Proceduresa. Any request for review of a notice of termination or other adverse decision should beaddressed to the Grants Officer. It must be postmarked or transmitted electronically no laterthan 30 days after the postmarked date of such termination or adverse decision from the GrantsOfficer.

b. The request for review must contain a full statement of the Grantee's position and thepertinent facts and reasons in support of such position.

c. The Grants Officer will promptly acknowledge receipt of the request for review and shallforward it to the Director, Office of Administration, who shall appoint a review committeeconsisting of a minimum of three persons.

d. Pending resolution of the request for review, the NRC may withhold or defer paymentsunder the award during the review proceedings.

e. The review committee will request the Grants Officer who issued the notice oftermination or adverse action to provide copies of all relevant background materials anddocuments. The committee may, at its discretion, invite representatives of the Grantee and theNRC program office to discuss pertinent issues and to submit such additional information as itdeems appropriate. The chairman of the review committee will insure that all review activities orproceedings are adequately documented.

f. Based on its review, the committee will prepare its recommendation to the Director,Office of Administration, who will advise the parties concerned of his/her decision.

Termination and Enforcement. Termination of this award by default or by mutual consent shallfollow provisions as established in 2 CFR 215.60,

Monitorinq and Reportinq § 215.51

a. Grantee Financial Management systems must comply with the established provisions in 2CFR 215.21

" Payment - 2 CFR 215.22" Cost Share- 2 CFR 215.23" Program Income- 2 CFR 215.24

o Earned program income, if any, shall be added to funds committed to the projectby the NRC and Grantee and used to further eligible project or programobjectives.

* Budget Revision- 2 CFR 215.25o In accordance with 2 CFR 215.25(e), the NRC waives the prior approval

requirement for items identified in sub-part (e)(1-4).o The Grantee is not authorized to rebudget between direct costs and indirect

costs without written approval of the Grants Officer.o Allowable Costs - 2 CFR 215.27

b. Federal Financial Reports

Effective October 1, 2008, NRC transitioned from the SF-269, SF-269A, SF-272, and SF-272A to the Federal Financial Report (SF-425) as required by OMB:http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreq/2008/081308 ffr.pdfhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/qrants/standard forms/ffr.pdfhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/qrants/standard forms/ffr instructions.pdf

The Grantee shall submit a "Federal Financial Report" (SF-425) on a quarterly basis for theperiods ending 3/31, 6/30, 9/30, and 12/31 or any portion thereof, unless otherwise specifiedin a special award condition. Reports are due no later than 30 days following the end ofeach reporting period. A final SF-425 shall be submitted within 90 days after expiration ofthe award.

Period of Availability of Funds 2 CFR § 215.28

a. Where a funding period is specified, a Grantee may charge to the grant only allowable costsresulting from obligations incurred during the funding period and any pre-award costs authorizedby the NRC.

b. Unless otherwise authorized in 2 CFR 215.25(e)(2) or a special award condition, anyextension of the award period can only be authorized by the Grants Officer in writing. Verbal orwritten assurances of funding from other than the Grants Officer shall not constitute authority toobligate funds for programmatic activities beyond the expiration date.

c. The NRC has no obligation to provide any additional prospective or incremental funding. Anymodification of the award to increase funding and to extend the period of performance is at thesole discretion of the NRC.

d. Requests for extensions to the period of performance shall be sent to the Grants Officer atleast 30 days prior to the grant/cooperative agreement expiration date. Any request forextension after the expiration date shall not be honored.

Automated Standard Application For Payments (ASAP) ProceduresUnless otherwise provided for in the award document, payments under this award will be madeusing the Department of Treasury's Automated Standard Application for Payment (ASAP)system < http://www.fms.treas.gov/asap/>. Under the ASAP system, payments are made,through preauthorized electronic funds transfers, in accordance with the requirements of theDebt Collection Improvement Act of 1996. In order to receive payments under ASAP, Granteesare required to enroll with the Department of Treasury, Financial Management Service, andRegional Financial Centers, which allows them to use the on-line method of withdrawing fundsfrom their ASAP established accounts. The following information will be required to makewithdrawals under ASAP: (1) ASAP account number - the award number found on the coversheet of the award; (2) Agency Location Code (ALC) - 31000001; and Region Code. Granteesenrolled in the ASAP system do not need to submit a "Request for Advance or Reimbursement"(SF-270), for payments relating to their award.

Audit RequirementsOrganization-wide or program-specific audits shall be performed in accordance with the SingleAudit Act Amendments of 1996, as implemented by OMB Circular A-1 33, "Audits of States,Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations."http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a 133/a133. html Grantees are subject to theprovisions of OMB Circular A-1 33 if they expend $500,000 or more in a year in Federal awards.

The Form SF-SAC and the Single Audit Reporting packages for fiscal periods ending on or afterJanuary 1, 2008 must be submitted online.

1. Create your online report ID at http://harvester.census.gov/fac/collect/ddeindex.html2. Complete the Form SF-SAC3. Upload the Single Audit4. Certify the Submission5. Click "Submit."

Organizations expending less than $500,000 a year are not required to have an annual audit forthat year but must make their grant-related records available to NRC or other designatedofficials for review or audit.

III. Programmatic Requirements

Performance (Technical) Reports

a. The Grantee shall submit performance (technical) reports electronically to the NRC ProjectOfficer and Grants Officer as specified in the special award conditions in the same frequency asthe Federal Financial Report unless otherwise authorized by the Grants Officer.

b. Unless otherwise specified in the award provisions, performance (technical) reports shallcontain brief information as prescribed in the applicable uniform administrative requirements 2CFR §215.51 which are incorporated in the award.

c. The Office of Human Resources requires the submission of the semi-annual progress reporton the SF-PPR, SF-PPR-B, and the SF-PPR-E forms. The submission for the six month periodending March 3 1st is due by April 3 0 th. The submission for the six month period endingSeptember 3 0 th is due by October 31st.

Unsatisfactory Performance

Failure to perform the work in accordance with the terms of the award and maintain at least asatisfactory performance- rating or equivalent evaluation may result in designation of theGrantee as high risk and assignment of special award conditions or other further action asspecified in the standard term and condition entitled "Termination".

Failure to comply with any or all of the provisions of the award may have a negative impact onfuture funding by NRC and may be considered grounds for any or all of the following actions:establishment of an accounts receivable, withholding of payments under any NRC award,changing the method of payment from advance to reimbursement only, or the imposition ofother special award conditions, suspension of any NRC active awards, and termination of anyNRC award.

Other Federal Awards With Similar Programmatic ActivitiesThe Grantee shall immediately provide written notification to the NRC Project Officer and theGrants Officer in the event that, subsequent to receipt of the NRC award, other financialassistance is received to support or fund any portion of the program description incorporatedinto the NRC award. NRC will not pay for costs that are funded by other sources.

Prohibition Against Assignment By The GranteeThe Grantee shall not transfer, pledge, mortgage, or otherwise assign the award, or any interesttherein, or any claim arising thereunder, to any party or parties, banks, trust companies, or otherfinancing or financial institutions without the express written approval of the Grants Officer.

Site VisitsThe NRC, through authorized representatives, has the right, at all reasonable times, to make

.site visits to review project accomplishments and management control systems and to providesuch technical assistance as may be required. If any site visit is made by the NRC on thepremises of the Grantee or contractor under an award, the Grantee shall provide and shallrequire his/her contractors to provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety andconvenience of the Government representative in the performance of their duties. All site visitsand evaluations shall be performed in such a manner as will not unduly delay the work.

IV. Miscellaneous Requirements

Criminal and Prohibited Activitiesa. The Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (31 USC § 3801-3812), provides for the imposition

of civil penalties against persons who make false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims to theFederal government for money (including money representing grant/cooperativeagreements, loans, or other benefits.)

b. False statements (18 USC § 287), provides that whoever makes or presents any false,fictitious, or fraudulent statements, representations, or claims against the United States shallbe subject to imprisonment of not more than five years and shall be subject to a fine in theamount provided by 18 USC § 287.

c. False Claims Act (31 USC 3729 et seq), provides that suits under this Act can be brought bythe government, or a person on behalf of the government, for false claims under federalassistance programs.

d. Copeland "Anti-Kickback" Act (18 USC § 874), prohibits a person or organization engaged ina federally supported project from enticing an employee working on the project from givingup a part of his compensation under an employment contract.

American-Made Equipment And ProductsGrantees are herby notified that they are encouraged, to the greatest extent practicable, topurchase American-made equipment and products with funding provided under this award.

Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United StatesPursuant to EO 13043, Grantees should encourage employees and contractors to enforce on-the-job seat belt policies and programs when operating company-owned, rented or personally-owned vehicle.

Federal Employee ExpensesFederal agencies are generally barred from accepting funds from a Grantee to paytransportation, travel, or other expenses for any Federal employee unless specifically approvedin the terms of the award. Use of award funds (Federal or non-Federal) or the Grantee'sprovision of in-kind goods or services, for the purposes of transportation, travel, or any otherexpenses for any Federal employee may raise appropriation augmentation issues. In addition,NRC policy prohibits the acceptance of gifts, including travel payments for Federal employees,from Grantees or applicants regardless of the source.

Minority Serving Institutions (MSWs) InitiativePursuant to EOs 13256, 13230, and 13270, NRC is.strongly committed to broadening theparticipation of MSIs in its financial assistance program. NRC's goals include achieving fullparticipation of MSIs in order to advance the development of human potential, strengthen theNation's capacity to provide high-quality education, and increase opportunities for MSIs toparticipate in and benefit form Federal financial assistance programs. NRC encourages allapplicants and Grantees to include meaningful participations of MSIs. Institutions eligible to beconsidered MSIs are listed on the Department of Education website:http://www.ed .gov/about/offices/list/ocr/edlite-minorityinst.html

Research MisconductScientific or research misconduct refers to the fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism inproposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. It does notinclude honest errors or differences of opinions. The Grantee organization has the primaryresponsibility to investigate allegations and provide reports to the Federal Government. Fundsexpended on an activity that is determined to be invalid or unreliable because of scientificmisconduct may result in a disallowance of costs for which the institution may be liable forrepayment to the awarding agency. The Office of Science and Technology Policy at the WhiteHouse published in the Federal Register on December 6, 2000, a final policy that addressedresearch misconduct. The policy was developed by the National Science and TechnologyCouncil (65 FR 76260). The NRC requires that any allegation be submitted to the GrantsOfficer, who will also notify the OIG of such allegation. Generally, the Grantee organizationshall investigate the allegation and submit its findings to the Grants Officer. The NRC mayaccept the Grantee's findings or proceed with its own investigation. The Grants Officer shallinform the Grantee of the NRC's final determination.

Publications, Videos, and Acknowledgment of SponsorshipPublication of the results or findings of a research project in appropriate professional journalsand production of video or other media is encouraged as an important method of recording and

reporting scientific information. It is also a constructive means to expand access to federallyfunded research. The Grantee is required to submit a copy to the NRC and when releasinginformation related to a funded project include a statement that the project or effort undertakenwas or is sponsored by the NRC. The Grantee is also responsible for assuring that everypublication of material (including Internet sites and videos) based on or developed under anaward, except scientific articles or papers appearing in scientific, technical or professionaljournals, contains the following disclaimer:

"This [reportlvideo] was prepared by [Grantee name] under award [number] from [name ofoperating unit], Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The statements, findings, conclusions,and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view ofthe [name of operating unit] or the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission."