+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Grant, Samantha1; Brentnall, Jennie2; Luft, Inbal1 poster.pdf · Post Pre (n= 44 , t = 4 .77 , p <...

Grant, Samantha1; Brentnall, Jennie2; Luft, Inbal1 poster.pdf · Post Pre (n= 44 , t = 4 .77 , p <...

Date post: 30-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Methods Training Co-facilitators clinical psychologist occupational therapist Interactive discussion, case examples, video & role play to: - understand impairments - reflect on strategies - consider case examples Evaluation Survey and interviews • 3 time points T1 (training) T2 (3 months) T3 Pre Post Follow-up • Qualitative content analysis with NVivo • Statistical analysis with SPSS • University Human Research Ethics Committee Participants • 3 trainings • 12 organisations • 60 attendees (9 males) 34 support workers 16 managers / co-ordinators / care assessors 8 qualified clinicians (1 unknown) • Questionnaires 53 at Time 1, 52 at Time 2, Time 3 in progress Introduction This practical training for direct support workers (DSWs) addresses a recognised need to improve workers’ knowledge, confidence, and practice in working with the target population (1). The prevalence of challenging behaviour among traumatic brain injury rehabilitation clients is over 50% (2). Clients’ challenging behaviours contribute to (2): - Poor outcomes - Increased levels of unmet need - Reduced participation - Higher levels of care & support Disability workers surveyed in Victoria (70% DSWs) reported that in a one month period (3): - 65% were exposed to physical aggression resulting in injury (almost half reporting injury to themselves) - 86% were exposed to verbal aggression (72% to themselves) - 97% were exposed to other challenging behaviours Most these workers felt the general training they received didn’t provide useful strategies and, as a result, they often implemented reactive behaviour management strategies (3). Exposure to challenging behaviours is known to contribute to DSW depression, stress, and burnout (3,4). Acknowledgments This project was supported by the Lifetime Care and Support Authority. The training was developed by arbias with thanks to their clients, particularly those video recorded for training. Results Participants met their goals Improve their knowledge and understanding Develop their skills and confidence Learn strategies, particularly for behavioral impairment Increase their capacity to support other team members Better help clients to achieve their goals Knowledge of Outcomes of ABI Increased Knowledge Confidence Improved Confidence and Self-Efficacy Improved Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Disagree Post Pre (n=44, t = 4.77, p < .001) Agreement with individual self-efficacy statements increased: Performance when things are tough +25% Success overcoming many challenges with clients +22% Confidence to work with the target population +19% Knowing how to respond to difficult behaviours +27% Conclusions The training successfully provided the required knowledge in order for participants to work effectively with clients with cognitive impairment and behaviours of concern following acquired brain injury. Before training, participants identified they lacked knowledge in this area and that ultimately impacted on their ability to support clients achieving person-centred goals After training participants understood the impairments and deficits and the thought process behind addressing these Following training, participants were confident they could improve their practice even when novel difficult situations arise, and would be less reliant on professionals once their clients’ profiles of strengths and weaknesses had been identified In particular, participants now recognise the importance of environmental factors, which they can contribute to, in modifying behaviour and promoting goal attainment The training illustrated to participants the different types of supports that clients may need (e.g. physical assistance, prompting, supervision, feedback etc.); they were surprised that non-hands on support can be equally important to promoting goal attainment The knowledge, skills and confidence obtained by the participants from the arbias training indicates that empowering all support staff to work effectively with people with an acquired brain injury will ultimately result in improved outcomes for the individuals and potentially less reliance on formal supports in the future. Grant, Samantha 1 ; Brentnall, Jennie 2 ; Luft, Inbal 1 1. arbias ABI Specialist Services NSW; 2. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney Literature cited (1) NSW Government Lifetime Care and Support Authority (2) Sabaz, M. (2012). Challenging behaviours project: Adults - Using the analysis of prevalence, course, co- morbidity and burden to inform the model of care. Sydney: NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation. (3) Koritsas, S., Iacono, T., Carling-Jenkins, R., & Chan, J. (2010). Exposure to challenging behaviour and support worker/house supervisor well-being. Melbourne: The Centre for Developmental Disability Health Victoria. (4) Rose, J., Jones, F., & Fletcher, B. (1998). Investigating the relationship between stress and worker behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42, 163-• 172. 2 days ••• …it just gives you that extra level of confidence that you are doing the right thing… customisations to make sure that every person has what's going to work for them (P78) 96% would recommend the training 1/50 did not meet goals Agree Neutral Disagree Pre-training Post-training Cognitive Memory impairment Memory impairment Slowed information processing Difficulty with new learning Planning and organisation Psychological & Behavioural Impulsiveness / Disinhibition / Poor self control Aggression Socially inappropriate behaviour / impairment Reduced insight/awareness Irritability / Agitation Aggression Depression Socially inappropriate behaviour Pre-training Post-training Short, clear, simple verbal communication Routines and structure Reminders, prompts, and cues Memory and organisation strategies and aids Listening to the client Exercise Remaining calm, not taking behaviour personally Repetition and consistency Goal setting and realistic expectations Distraction and redirection Distraction and redirection Memory and organisation strategies and aids Short, clear, simple verbal communication Reminders, prompts, and cues Feedback to the client Routines and structure Encourage or reinforce positive behaviour Identify and control triggers to behaviour Non-verbal communication and visual aids Repetition, consistency and practice Goal setting and realistic expectations Manipulation of the environment Anyone working with clients with brain injury, I think they should do the training before they start working. Because some of them are doing training on the job and I don't think that's good enough myself, for someone with a brain injury.(P63) Knowledge of Strategies to Use with Clients Expanded
Transcript
Page 1: Grant, Samantha1; Brentnall, Jennie2; Luft, Inbal1 poster.pdf · Post Pre (n= 44 , t = 4 .77 , p < .001 ) •Agreement with individual self-efficacy statements increased: Performance

Methods

Training

• Co-facilitators

clinical psychologist

occupational therapist

• Interactive discussion, case

examples, video & role play to:

- understand impairments

- reflect on strategies

- consider case examples

Evaluation

• Survey and interviews

• 3 time points

↓ ↓ ↓

T1 (training) T2 (3 months) T3

Pre Post Follow-up

• Qualitative content analysis with NVivo

• Statistical analysis with SPSS

• University Human Research Ethics Committee

Participants • 3 trainings • 12 organisations

• 60 attendees (9 males)

34 support workers

16 managers / co-ordinators / care assessors

8 qualified clinicians (1 unknown)

• Questionnaires

53 at Time 1, 52 at Time 2, Time 3 in progress

Introduction This practical training for direct support workers (DSWs)

addresses a recognised need to improve workers’

knowledge, confidence, and practice in working with the

target population (1).

• The prevalence of challenging behaviour among traumatic

brain injury rehabilitation clients is over 50% (2). Clients’

challenging behaviours contribute to (2):

- Poor outcomes - Increased levels of unmet need

- Reduced participation - Higher levels of care & support

• Disability workers surveyed in Victoria (70% DSWs)

reported that in a one month period (3):

- 65% were exposed to physical aggression resulting in injury

(almost half reporting injury to themselves)

- 86% were exposed to verbal aggression (72% to themselves)

- 97% were exposed to other challenging behaviours

Most these workers felt the general training they received

didn’t provide useful strategies and, as a result, they often

implemented reactive behaviour management strategies (3).

Exposure to challenging behaviours is known to contribute

to DSW depression, stress, and burnout (3,4).

Acknowledgments This project was supported by the Lifetime Care and Support Authority. The training was

developed by arbias with thanks to their clients, particularly those video recorded for training.

Results Participants met their goals Improve their knowledge and understanding

Develop their skills and confidence

Learn strategies, particularly for behavioral impairment

Increase their capacity to support other team members

Better help clients to achieve their goals

Knowledge of Outcomes of ABI Increased

Knowledge Confidence Improved

Confidence and Self-Efficacy Improved

Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Agree Disagree

⃝ ⃝ ⃝ ⃝ ⃝

↑ ↑ Post Pre (n=44, t = 4.77, p < .001)

• Agreement with individual self-efficacy statements increased:

Performance when things are tough +25%

Success overcoming many challenges with clients +22%

Confidence to work with the target population +19%

Knowing how to respond to difficult behaviours +27%

Conclusions The training successfully provided the required knowledge in

order for participants to work effectively with clients with

cognitive impairment and behaviours of concern following

acquired brain injury.

• Before training, participants identified they lacked

knowledge in this area and that ultimately impacted on their

ability to support clients achieving person-centred goals

• After training participants understood the impairments and

deficits and the thought process behind addressing these

• Following training, participants were confident they could

improve their practice even when novel difficult situations

arise, and would be less reliant on professionals once their

clients’ profiles of strengths and weaknesses had been

identified

• In particular, participants now recognise the importance of

environmental factors, which they can contribute to, in

modifying behaviour and promoting goal attainment

• The training illustrated to participants the different types of

supports that clients may need (e.g. physical assistance,

prompting, supervision, feedback etc.); they were surprised

that non-hands on support can be equally important to

promoting goal attainment

The knowledge, skills and confidence obtained by the

participants from the arbias training indicates that empowering

all support staff to work effectively with people with an

acquired brain injury will ultimately result in improved

outcomes for the individuals and potentially less reliance on

formal supports in the future.

Grant, Samantha1; Brentnall, Jennie2; Luft, Inbal1 1. arbias ABI Specialist Services NSW; 2. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney

Literature cited (1) NSW Government Lifetime Care and Support Authority

(2) Sabaz, M. (2012). Challenging behaviours project: Adults - Using the analysis of prevalence, course, co-

morbidity and burden to inform the model of care. Sydney: NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation.

(3) Koritsas, S., Iacono, T., Carling-Jenkins, R., & Chan, J. (2010). Exposure to challenging behaviour and

support worker/house supervisor well-being. Melbourne: The Centre for Developmental Disability Health

Victoria.

(4) Rose, J., Jones, F., & Fletcher, B. (1998). Investigating the relationship between stress and worker

behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42, 163-•172.

• 2 days

•••

…it just gives you

that extra level of

confidence that you

are doing the right

thing… customisations

to make sure that every

person has what's

going to work for them

(P78)

96% would recommend

the training

1/50 did not meet goals

Agree Neutral Disagree

Pre-training Post-training

Cognitive Memory impairment

Memory impairment

Slowed information processing

Difficulty with new learning

Planning and organisation

Psychological

& Behavioural

Impulsiveness / Disinhibition / Poor self

control

Aggression

Socially inappropriate behaviour /

impairment

Reduced insight/awareness

Irritability / Agitation

Aggression

Depression

Socially inappropriate behaviour

Pre-training Post-training Short, clear, simple verbal communication

Routines and structure

Reminders, prompts, and cues

Memory and organisation strategies and aids

Listening to the client

Exercise

Remaining calm, not taking behaviour

personally

Repetition and consistency

Goal setting and realistic expectations

Distraction and redirection

Distraction and redirection

Memory and organisation strategies and aids

Short, clear, simple verbal communication

Reminders, prompts, and cues

Feedback to the client

Routines and structure

Encourage or reinforce positive behaviour

Identify and control triggers to behaviour

Non-verbal communication and visual aids

Repetition, consistency and practice

Goal setting and realistic expectations

Manipulation of the environment

Anyone working with clients with brain

injury, I think they should do the training

before they start working. Because some of

them are doing training on the job and I

don't think that's good enough myself, for

someone with a brain injury.” (P63)

Knowledge of Strategies to Use with Clients Expanded

Recommended