Graph Charts

8/8/2019 Graph Charts

1/62

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETETION

Table-1 showing the age of the respondents

Analysis:-

The table shows out of 50 respondents 06 employees are below 20 years of age, 36 are of the

age between 20 to 30 and 8 employees are of age between 30 to 40 years old.

Interpretations:

The graph shows that 72 %of employees are aged between 20 to 30 16% are of age

between30 to 40 and remaining 12% are of the age below20. this indicates that maximum

employees in this company are aged between 20 to 30 year

Age Respondents Percentage

Below 20 years 06 12

Between 20 to 30 years 36 72


Above 40 years 0 0

Total 50 100


2/62

Graph-1: Sho

in

age ofthe respondents.


3/62

Table-2 showing the gender of the respondents

Gender Respondents Percentage

Male 08 16

Female 42 84

Total 50 100

Analysis:

The table shows out of 50 respondents only 8 employees are male and 42 employees are

female.


4/62

Inference:

84% of employees are female and only 16% are male employees. Since it is a clothing

company the strength of female employees is more as indicated in the graph below.

Graph-2: Showing the percentage of male and female employees


5/62


6/62

Table-3: Indicating the marital status of the respondents

Analysis:

The above table indicates that out of the sample of 50 respondents 22 employees are married

and 28 employees are unmarried.

Inference:

This indicates 44% employees are married and 66% of employees are unmarried as the graph

indicates.

Marital status Respondents Percentage

Married 22 44

Unmarried 28 56

Total 50 100


7/62

Graph-3:sho

ing the percentage ofmarried emplo

ees


8/62

Table-4: Indicating the qualification level of the respondents .

Qualification Respondents Percentage

S.S.L.C 22 44

P.U.C 07 14

Diploma 02 04

Graduation 12 24

Post graduation 07 14

Total 50 100

Analysis:


9/62

As the table indicates out of 50 respondents 22 respondents have completed their S.S.L.C,

07 have completed P.U.C, and 02 respondents have completed their diploma, and 12 respondents

are graduates, and 07 respondents are post graduates.

Inference:

Maximum people working in this company have completed their S.S.L.C, followed by

graduates, P.U.C, post graduates, and diploma holders as indicated in the graph below.

Graph-4: Showing the qualification of the respondents


10/62

Table-5: Sho

ing the experience ofthe respondents.


11/62

Analysis:

As the table indicates, 26 employees are below 3 years experienced, 13 are experienced

between 3 to 6 years, 08 respondents are experienced between 6 to 9 years, 01 respondent has the

experience of 9 to 12 years and 2 respondents out of 50 are experienced more than 12 years.

Inference:

It indicates the percentage of employees having experience below 3 years is more followed

by employees experienced between 3 to 6 years, and employees experienced between 6 to 9 years.

Experience Respondents Percentage

Below 3 years 26 52




Above 12 years 02 04

Total 50 100


12/62

Graph-5: Sho

ing the experience ofthe respondents

.


13/62


14/62

Table indicates that out of 50 respondents 33 have attended training and development

programmes only once. 07 respondents have attended twice. 00002 respondents have attended

thrice. 08 respondents have responded negatively saying they never been sponsored for the training

and development programmes.

Inference:

As the table indicates 66% employees have responded positively saying that they have

attended training and development programmes once. 16% employees responded negatively saying

they never been sponsored for the training and development programmes.

Graph-6: indicating the percentage of no of times respondents

attended the training and development progra ms


15/62


16/62

Table-7: Showing the duration of the training and development program

Duration Respondents Percentage

One month 20 40

Three month 05 10

Six month 12 24

Above six month 05 10

Never 08 16

Total 50 100

Analysis:

The table indicates that 20 respondents have responded duration of training and development

as 1 month, 05 responded as 3 months, 12 responded as 6 months. And 08 responded negatively

that they never been sponsored for the training and development programme.

Inference:

It is found that the duration of training and development programmes for 40% of the

respondents was 1 month. And for 24% employees it was 6 months.


17/62

Graph-7: Indicating the durationoftraining anddevelopmentprogram.


18/62

Table-8: Indicating the training method employed

Methods Respondents Percentage

On the job 39 78

Off-the-job 00 00

Both 03 06

None 08 16

Total 50 100

Analysis:


19/62

As the table indicates, out of 50 respondents 39 employees have responded training method

employed was on the job. 03 responded as both on job and off- the job. 08 respondents have

responded negatively that they never been sponsored for the training and development

programmes.

Inference:

The method employed is on job training method. Since the company is a clothing firm, it can

train its employees better in the real working conditions. On job method is handy for training the

employees in the clothing firms.

Graph-8: Showing the method of training employed


20/62


21/62

Table-9: Showing frequency of discussion between the trainee and

participants during the training and development programme .

Analysis:

Table indicates that out 50 respondents 21 responded as there was the space for discussion

always. 19 have responded some times. 04 have responded rarely. 08 have responded negatively

that they never attended any training programme.

Frequency of discussion Respondents Percentage

Always 21 42

Some time 17 34

Rarely 04 08

Never 08 16

Total 50 100


22/62

Inference:

Training programs come useful only when there is a space for open discussion. In this company

there is space for open discussion between trainer and participants.

Graph-09: Showing the frequency of discussion between trainer and

participants


23/62

Table-10: Sho

ing whether the emplo

ees are sponsoredtothe training as

per the training needsor not.


24/62

Frequency Respondents Percentage

Always 25 50

Some time 14 28

Rarely 03 06

Never 08 16

Total 50 100

Analysis:

The table indicates that 50% of the respondents responded as the employees are sponsored

to the training programmes always as per the training needs. And 14% have responded as

sometimes. And 6% have responded as the employees are rarely sponsored to the training as per

the needs. And 16% have responded negatively as they never attended any training programmes.

They responded as never.

Inference:

No company will sponsor its employees for training unless and until there is a need for

training programmes.


25/62

Graph-10: Showing whether emplo

ees are sponsored to the training

programs asper the training needsor not.


26/62

Table-11: Showing training and development programs cultivate the sense of

competition and competitiveness among the employees

Frequency Respondents Percentage

Always 27 54

Sometime 12 24

Rarely 03 06

Never 08 16

Total 50 100

Analysis:

As a table indicates 54% of people responded as a training and development programs always

cultivate the sense of competition an competitiveness, 24% of employees responded as some times,

06% have responded as rarely.16% of employees responded negatively as never.


27/62

Inference:

The table indicates that the training and development programs always cultivate the sense of

competition and competitiveness.

Graph-11: Showing training and development programs cultivate the sense of

competition and competitiveness among the employees


28/62


29/62

Table-12: Showing the effectiveness of the training programs conducted by

the organization

Analysis:

The table indicates that out of 50 respondents 42 respondents have responded positively as

training program conducted by the organization was effective. Rest of the 08 respondents

responded negatively as the never undergone any training program conducted by the organization.

Inference:

Thus as the maximum employees have responded the training programs conducted by the

organization as effective, the training programs conducted by the organization are effective.

Effectiveness Respondents Percentage

Yes 42 84

No 08 16

Total 50 100


30/62

Graph-12: Showing the effectivenessof the training programs conductedb

the organi

ation.


31/62


32/62

As the table indicates 45 respondents out of 50 responded have that there is link between

training and development. Rest of the 05 respondents opined there is no link between training and

development.

Inference:

As the graph below shows there is link between training and development.

Graph-13: Showing the link between training and development "


33/62


34/62

Table-14: Showing the frequency of increase in skills and talents towards the

assigned job #

Increase in skills and talents Respondents Percentage

Always 32 64

Sometime 15 30

Rarely 02 04

Never 01 02

Total 50 100

Analysis:

As table indicates 64% employees responded that training programs have always increased

the skills and talents towards the assigned job, 30% have opined as some times, 04% responded as

rarely, 02% have responded as never.

Inference:

As maximum respondents opined that always training programs have increased the skills and

talents towards the job, training and development programs increases the skills and talents towards

assigned job.


35/62

Graph-14: Showing the frequency ofincrease ins $ ills andtalents with

effecttotraining programs.


36/62

Table-15: Showing increase in productivity once after the training

program

Increase in productivity Respondents Percentage

Always 33 66

Sometime 10 20

Rarely 06 12

Never 01 02

Total 50 100


37/62

Analysis:

As the table indicates 66% of the respondents have opined that training programs

conducted have increased the productivity. 20% have responded that training has some

times increased productivity. And 12% have responded as training programs have increased

the productivity rarely.

Rest of the 02% responded negatively that training programs never increases the

productivity .

Inference:

Maximum employees opined that training programs conducted have always increased the

productivity. Training increases the productivity and reduces the wastage.

Graph-15: Showing the increase in productivity


38/62


39/62

Table-16: Showing the influence of training on morale and motivation

level %

Increase in morale and

motivation level

Respondents Percentage

Always 25 50

Sometime 22 44

Rarely 02 04

Never 01 02

Total 50 100

Analysis:

The table shows that 50% of respondents have responded that their morale and

motivation levels always increased with effect to training and development programs, 44%

have responded some times and 04% have responded as rarely. Rest of the 02% of

respondents responded as never.

Inference:

Hence training and development programs increases the morale and motivation

level of the employees, since maximum employees have opined that morale and motivation

level has increased with effect to the training and development programs conducted by the

organization.


40/62

Graph-16: Showing the level moral and motivation with effect tothe

training anddevelopmentprograms.


41/62

Table-17: Showing frequency of class room training helping the actual

work &

Class room training helps in

actual work

Respondents Percentage

Always 14 28


42/62

Analysis:

The table shows that 28% of the respondents have responded as always class room training

will help in actual work, 24% of employees as some times, 18% have responded as rarely.

And 30% have responded as class room training never helps in actual work.

Inference:

Since the training method employed in the company is on job training method, hence

employees felt the above i.e., class room training will never help in actual work.

Sometime 12 24

Rarely 09 18

Never 15 30

Total 50 100


43/62

Graph-17: Showing frequency ofclass room training helping actual work.


44/62

Table-18: Showing about the feedback system

Analysis:

As the table indicates out of 50 respondents 42 have responded as there is feed back

system. Rest of the respondents responded negatively as there is no feedback system.

Inference:

Feedback Respondents Percentage

Yes 42 84

No 08 16

Total 50 100


45/62

As 84% respondents responded there is a feedback system after the training program. There

Graph-18: Showing about the feedback system


46/62


47/62


48/62

As 84% respondents responded that they are aware of their strengths and weaknesses. Thus

employees are aware of their strengths and weakness once after attending the training programs.

Graph-19: Showing the awareness of strengths and weaknesses


49/62


50/62

Table-20: Showing whether the company the company has revised the

training programs once after the feedback '

Analysis:

The table shows that 84% of people have responded that the company has revised the

training programs after receiving the feedback. Rest of the 16% respondents have responded

negatively by saying the company has never revised the training programs after receiving the

feedback from the employees.

Inference:

Revision of training Respondents Percentage

Yes 42 84

No 08 16

Total 50 100


51/62

The graph below indicates that the company has revised the training programs after receiving

the feedback from the employees.

Graph-20: Showing whether the company has revised the training programs

after receiving the feedback or not (


52/62

Table-21: Showing whether employees are satisfied withthe training method

implementedpresently or not.


53/62

Analysis:

The table shows that 84% of the respondents are satisfied with the present method of

training implemented in the organization. And 16% of the respondents have responded negatively

by saying they are not satisfied with the present training method.

Inference:

The employees are satisfied with the present method of training, since 84% of the

respondents have responded positively as they are satisfied.

Satisfaction Respondents Percentage

Yes 42 84

No 08 16

Total 50 100


54/62

Graph-21: Showing whether employees are satisfied withthe present

training methodor not.


55/62

Table-22: Showing the percentage of employees who take initiatives to

implement the new ideas they leant in training programs )

Initiative Respondents Percentage

Yes 39 78

No 11 22

Total 50 100


56/62

Analysis:

Table shows that 78% of the respondents have said they will take initiatives to implement the

new ideas learnt in the training programs. Only 12% of the respondents have said no.

Inference:

The employees are ready to take initiative to implement the new ideas learnt through

training programs.


57/62


58/62

Table-23: Showing the percentage of respondents interested to attend the

training and development programs in further future

Analysis:

Table indicates that 98% of the respondents are interested in attending the training

programs in the further future. Only 2% of the respondents have responded negatively as they are

do not like to attend the training programs in the further future.

Inference:

Interested Respondents Percentage

Yes 49 98

No 01 02

Total 50 100


59/62

Almost all the employees are interested in attending the training programs in the near

future.

Graph-23: Showing the percentage of the respondents interested in

attending the training program 0


60/62

Table-24: Showing the methodoftraining employeesprefer.


61/62

Analysis:

The table shows that 82% of the employees like on job training method. Only 18% of the

employees like off- the job training methods.

Inference:

Most of the employees prefer on job training methods.

Prefer Respondents Percentage

Yes 41 82

No 09 18

Total 50 100


62/62

Graph-24: Showing the methodoftraining employeesprefer

Date post:	10-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	lakshmi-kanth
View:	221 times
Download:	0 times

Graph Charts

Documents