+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar...

Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar...

Date post: 12-Nov-2016
Category:
Upload: rk-verma
View: 219 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
20
Tectonophysics, 178 (1990) 337-356 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands 337 Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India R.K. VERMA and Y. SATYANARAYANA Department of Applied Geophysics, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad 826 004 (India) (Received December 17,1988; accepted August 24,1989) Abstract Verma, R.K. and Satyanarayana, Y., 1990. Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India. Tecronophysics, 178: 337-356. South of 21° N, the Indian Peninsula is character&d by very low Bpuguer gravity anomalies ranging from - 110 mGal to -60 mGa1. A low gravity field is present over the eastern margin of the Cuddapah basin, Dharwar craton. as well as areas covered by the Deccan traps. Several profiles drawn in the E-W direction across the southern peninsula show that the gravity anomalies have long wavelengths, of the order of several hundred kilometers. This feature appears to be related to the geoid low brought out by Gaposchkin and Lambeck (1970, 1971) on the basis of satellite gravity data. Deep-seismic sounding investigations carried out by Kaila et al. (1979) along Kavali-Udipi profile, running from the east coast of India to the west coast, provide a good deal of subsurface information concerning the configuration of the Cuddapah basin, Dharwar schist belts and the Moho along the entire profile. Various factor contribute to the gravity field. The gravity field over Cuddapah basin has been analysed in terms of sediments comprising the basin, the Moho configuration and intrusive bodies present underneath the basin. In order to explain satisfactorily the low gravity field over the Dharwar craton (to the west of the Cuddapah basin), a lower density upper mantle has been inferred. This feature appears to be related to processes that have taken place during the eruption of the Deccan traps over the Indian Peninsula and the formation of the Indian Ocean. Introduction One of the most prominent geoid anomalies This geoid anomaly appears to extend from observed over the Earth’s surface is the one over India towards Australia, covering a large part of the Indian Ocean and the surrounding Indian the Indian Ocean. The presence of this anomaly Peninsula (Gaposchkin and Lambeck, 1970,1971). has been confirmed by surface gravity measure- This anomaly has a wavelength of nearly 2500 km, ments in the Indian Ocean using 1 O x lo average a major part of which extends from the Carlsberg free-air anomaly values (figs. 2 and 3 of Kahle and ridge in the west to the Malaya Peninsula in the Talwani, 1973). An interesting feature of this east, and from 20” N to 20 o S in an N-S direc- anomaly is that it extends over a large part of the tion. The Gaposchkin and Lambeck (G and L) Indian Ocean, south of 21” N latitude. Un- geoid, obtained from spherical harmonic coeffi- doubtedly this feature suggests the presence of a cients up to degree and order 16, and terrestrial major mass anomaly which appears to be related gravity data, referred to an ellipsoid of flattening in some way to the processes that led to the l/297.0 is shown in Fig. 1 (after Kahle and Talwani, 1973). 0040-1951/90/$03.50 0 1990 - Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Transcript
Page 1: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

Tectonophysics, 178 (1990) 337-356

Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands

337

Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton

of India

R.K. VERMA and Y. SATYANARAYANA

Department of Applied Geophysics, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad 826 004 (India)

(Received December 17,1988; accepted August 24,1989)

Abstract

Verma, R.K. and Satyanarayana, Y., 1990. Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India. Tecronophysics, 178: 337-356.

South of 21° N, the Indian Peninsula is character&d by very low Bpuguer gravity anomalies ranging from - 110 mGal to -60 mGa1. A low gravity field is present over the eastern margin of the Cuddapah basin, Dharwar craton. as well as areas covered by the Deccan traps. Several profiles drawn in the E-W direction across the southern peninsula show that the gravity anomalies have long wavelengths, of the order of several hundred kilometers. This feature appears to be related to the geoid low brought out by Gaposchkin and Lambeck (1970, 1971) on the basis of satellite gravity data.

Deep-seismic sounding investigations carried out by Kaila et al. (1979) along Kavali-Udipi profile, running from the east coast of India to the west coast, provide a good deal of subsurface information concerning the configuration of the Cuddapah basin, Dharwar schist belts and the Moho along the entire profile. Various factor contribute to the gravity field.

The gravity field over Cuddapah basin has been analysed in terms of sediments comprising the basin, the Moho configuration and intrusive bodies present underneath the basin. In order to explain satisfactorily the low gravity field over the Dharwar craton (to the west of the Cuddapah basin), a lower density upper mantle has been inferred. This feature appears to be related to processes that have taken place during the eruption of the Deccan traps over the Indian Peninsula and the formation of the Indian Ocean.

Introduction

One of the most prominent geoid anomalies This geoid anomaly appears to extend from

observed over the Earth’s surface is the one over India towards Australia, covering a large part of

the Indian Ocean and the surrounding Indian the Indian Ocean. The presence of this anomaly

Peninsula (Gaposchkin and Lambeck, 1970,1971). has been confirmed by surface gravity measure-

This anomaly has a wavelength of nearly 2500 km, ments in the Indian Ocean using 1 O x lo average

a major part of which extends from the Carlsberg free-air anomaly values (figs. 2 and 3 of Kahle and

ridge in the west to the Malaya Peninsula in the Talwani, 1973). An interesting feature of this

east, and from 20” N to 20 o S in an N-S direc- anomaly is that it extends over a large part of the

tion. The Gaposchkin and Lambeck (G and L) Indian Ocean, south of 21” N latitude. Un-

geoid, obtained from spherical harmonic coeffi- doubtedly this feature suggests the presence of a

cients up to degree and order 16, and terrestrial major mass anomaly which appears to be related

gravity data, referred to an ellipsoid of flattening in some way to the processes that led to the

l/297.0 is shown in Fig. 1 (after Kahle and

Talwani, 1973).

0040-1951/90/$03.50 0 1990 - Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

Page 2: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

338 U.K. VERMA ANDY. SATYANARAYAMA

2o” 30’ ~0’ 50’ 60’ 7o” eoO 90°

Fig. 1. Gaposchkin and Lambeck (1971) geoid obtained from spherical harmonic coefficients up to degree and order 16, referred to

an ellipsoid of flattering l/297.0. Contour interval 10 m.

evolution of the Indian Ocean, formed as a result

of the break-up of Gondwanaland (McKenzie and

Sclater, 1971).

This major anomaly in the gravity field is also

reflected on the Bouguer as well as the isostatic

anomaly maps of the Southern Peninsula of India.

Recently, Kaila et al. (1979) have carried out

deep-seismic sounding (DSS) along a profile (Fig.

2) extending from Kavali on the east coast to

Udipi on the west coast, traversing the major

geological/ tectonic units of the Indian Peninsula.

This profile has provided vital information con-

cerning the crust and the upper mantle in the area.

Analysis of the gravity field along this profile

gives us a better insight into the processes leading

to the evolution of the Dharwar Craton, the East-

ern Ghats and the nature of the upper mantle

underneath the southern peninsula of India. These

studies throw some light on the nature of the

geoid anomaly mentioned earlier. Results of this

analysis are discussed in this paper.

Gravity field over the southern Indian Peninsula

A study of the Bouguer anomaly map of India

(NGRI, 1975; Verma, 1985) shows that the Indian

Peninsula can be broadly divided into two parts.

North of 20” N, Bouguer anomalies over shield

areas vary from 0 to - 50 mGal values (barring

the Indo-Gangetic plains), while to the south of

this latitude, the values vary from - 50 to - 120

mGa1, the Eastern Ghats belt being the only ex-

ception. The large negative anomaly in the south-

ern Peninsula of India (Fig. 3) cannot be ex-

plained in terms of near-surface geological or

topographical features (as shown in this paper). At

least a part of this anomaly appears to be related

to the constitution of the upper mantle.

That the anomalous gravity field is of deep-

seated origin is confirmed partly by the Airy iso-

static anomaly (T = 30 km) map of the southern

peninsula of India (Fig. 4). South of 21” N, the

isostatic anomalies are largely negative (- 20 to

Page 3: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

A R

AE3

1

SEA

BA

Y

OF

BEN

GA

L -

I 74O

sp8o

SH

OT

POIN

T 0

I I

I

76'

7B0

80°

L--

ALL

UVI

UM

L/

/ B

ASI

C

INTR

USI

VES

18

12O

I

- D

SS

PRO

FILE

ix

xl

DEC

CA

N

TRAP

S I-c

G

RA

NIT

ES

F[

CUDD

APAH

SE

DIM

ENTS

f-1

G

NEI

SSIC

C

OM

PLEX

DH

AR

WA

RS

AB

BR

. :

CC-C

LOSE

PET

GR

AN

ITE

; C

HT

- C

HIT

RA

DU

RG

A

i PN

P-

PAR

NA

PALL

E

CH

TB

- C

HIT

RA

DU

RG

A

SCH

IST

BEL

T

SHTB

-

SHIM

OG

A

SCH

IST

BEL

T Fi

g. 2

. nh

e lo

catio

n ,,f

the

Kav

ali-U

dipi

D

SS p

rofil

e,

in t

he s

outh

ern

pen

insu

la o

f In

dia

, af

ter

Kai

la e

t al

. (1

979)

. T

he

pro

file

tra

vers

es (

from

ea

st t

o w

-t),

the

hte

m

Gh

ats,

th

e

Cu

dd

apah

bas

in,

Pen

insu

lar

Gn

eiss

es,

Clo

sep

et g

ran

ite

and

th

e D

han

var

sch

ist

bel

t. :

Page 4: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

R.K. VERMA AND Y. SATYANARAYAMA

5 s:

]I W

0 2 u m

=:

a

nQ t

> 0 >

Page 5: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

GEOPHYSICAL STUDY OF CUDDAPAH BASIN AND DHARWAR CRATON. INDIA

UDlPl

ARABIAN

SEA I

BAY

OF

BENGAL

TRIVANDRUM~ \fl 0

72O I I I I

74O 76’ 70O 80”

MADRAS

ISOSTAT IC ANOMALY MA

(AIRY-HEISKANEN,T=30i

NGRI-1975

100 0 100 Km I 1 fi ’ 1

Contour Interval 10 mGal

I I

82’ i%’

Fig. 4. Airy isostatic anomaly (T = 30 km) map of southern India (after NGRI, 1975), showing large isostatic anomalies over parts of

the southern peninsula.

- 90 mGal), while over the northern shield areas, the anomalies vary from +50 to -20 mGal. Fig- ure 5 shows the nature of Bouguer and isostatic (Airy, T = 30 km) anomalies along several profiles trending in an E-W to ENE-WSW direction in the southern peninsula of India. The profiles show the nature of long wavelength anomalies. Over the southern peninsula the part of Eastern Ghats (E.G.), north of 16 o N, is again an exception, the isostatic anomalies being largely positive (0 to + 30 mGa1). Barring the E.G. the entire southern peninsula is characterised by negative isostatic anomaly values.

Problems concerning interpretation of the gravity field

The gravity field observed over the surface is influenced by several factors, such as the near- surface geological features, the Moho configura- tion and in some cases the anomalous structure of the asthenosphere or upper mantle (Fairhead, 1976; Brown and Girdler, 1980).

In order to interpret the regional gravity field, basic information is required regarding the Moho configuration and the velocity-depth function. The DSS profile shot by Kaila et al. (1979) from

Page 6: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

342

E o

DISTANCE,KM 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 600 900 1000 1100 E’

0 100 200 Km I

SCALE

INDEX

ALLUVIUM DHARWARS

10 001 GONDWANA GRANITES

n “V” DECCAN TRAPS __ p3??zJ GNEISSES WITH CHARNOCKITES

i!zzl CUDDAPAHS GNEISSES

SCALE 0 100 200 KM f % I 1 ,

Fig. 5. Profiles A-A’ to E-E’ traversing the southern peninsula of India in an E-W to ENE-WSW direction, showing the large

negative Bouguer as we11 as isostatic anomalies over the peninsuta. It may be noted that in genera1 the negative anomaties are

characterised by a long wavelength.

Page 7: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

GEOPHYSICAL STUDY ( 3F CUDDAPAH BASIN AND DHARWAR CRATON. INDIA 343

lV3W ‘A-IVWONV AllAVM WY ‘Hld30

Page 8: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

344 R.K. VERMA ANDY. SATYANARAYAMA

Kavali along the east coast to Udipi along the

west coast, provides us this basic information.

Kavali-Udipi DSS profile

The profile is located between latitude 13-

14’ N and longitude 74.5-80 o E and extends from

Kavali (14.8” N, 80 o E) on the east cost to Udipi

(13.5 o N, 74.7 ‘E) on the west coast (Fig. 2). The

profile traverses (from east to west), the Eastern

Chats, the Nellore Schist belt, the southern part of

the Cuddapah basin, the Peninsular Gneisses, the

Closepet granite, the Chitradurga and Schimoga

Schist belts and ends near Udipi on the west

coast. Figure 6 shows the results from the DSS

profile along with surface geology, elevation and

gravity field.

The basic information obtained from DSS in-

vestigation is the interval velocity vs depth func-

tion for the southern peninsula. This function

INTERVAL VELOCITY, KM/SEC

_5 6 7 8 9

obtained along the Kavali-Udipi profile, as well

as for the Koyna I and II profiles after Kaila et al.

(1979, 1981a, b) is shown in Fig. 7. The figure

shows that the interval velocity increases from 5.4

to 6.5 km s-’ between a depth of 0 and 15 km,

remaining constant at about 6.5 km s-’ upto 22

km, and then increasing gradually to 7.1 km s-’

down to about 40 km depth, where it jumps to 8.0

km s-‘. The interval velocity has been converted

into density values using the curve given by Ludwig

et al. (1970). It may be seen that the crustal

density at a depth of about 35-40 km is of the

order of 3.0 g/cmp3. The upper mantle density

has been taken to be 3.3 g/cme3, corresponding

to the velocities reported.

Analysis of the gravity field along Kavali-Udipi

profile has been carried out in two parts using all

available DSS information. Part I discusses the

analysis over the Eastern Ghats and the Cudda-

pah basin and Part II deals with the Dharwar

Craton (west of the Cuddapah basin).

DENSITY, 9/cm3

I I 1 , I ’ I ’ I I I 1

2.4 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6

30 - I Y

60 -

70 -

- S.PENINSULAR SHIELD

--x-x- KOYNA REGION

Fig. 7. Interval velocity vs depth relationship obtained for the southern peninsular shield (Kavali-Udipi profile) and Koyna region

according to Kaila et al. (1979, 1981a, b). The interval velocity has been converted into density using the relationship given by

Ludwig et al. (1970).

Page 9: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

GEOPHYSICAL STUDY OF CUDDAPAH BASIN AND DHARWAR CRATON, INDIA 345

I. Geology and tectonics of the Cuddapab basin

The Cuddapah basin, with its crescent shape, occupies a large area, about 44,000 km’, in the southern part of the Indian Peninsula, between latitudes 1395 and 17 o N, and longitudes 77 “45’ and 85”15’E. It is presumed to be a continental basin formed during Late Proterozoic times, a considerable lapse of time after the deposition, uplifting and metamorphism of the Dharwars.

The basin is filled with Precambrian sediments consisting of quartzites, limestones, dolomites, shales, slates (Cuddapah Group) and shales, limes- tones and quart&e (Kurnool Group). A large part of the basin is occupied by Cuddapah sediments, but the northwestern and the northern parts, which are generally low lying, are overlain by the Kumool formations. Major geological features of the Cud- dapah basin are shown in Fig. 8, together with isostatic anomaly contours (after Qureshy et al.,

1 15’ KAVALI

BAY

I N d.E X

I--1 ALLUVIUM pq < Ir ‘ DHARWAR

(ml LATERITE 11 UNCLAS Pl3”CTAI -t_n,a,nLLINES

vm UPPER GONDWANA F1 DOLERITES

m KURNOOLS I++1 GRANITE DOMES

f---l CUDDAPAH __AXIS OF

GRAVITY LOW

[ml KHONDALITES -a-a-DSS PROFILE 79” 80” 81’

,-10~ ISOSTATIC ANOMALY CONTOUR

Fig. 8. Tectonic map of the Cuddapah basin and adjoining areas showing Airy-Heiskanen anomaly contours (for T= 30 km)

superimposed on simplified geology (after Qureshy et al., 1968).

Page 10: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

346

1968). The total thickness of sediments is geologi-

cally estimated to be about 6000 m (Murthy,

1982). Narayanaswamy (1970) had discussed the

geology and tectonics of the Cuddapah basin in

detail.

The contact of the eastern part of the basin

with the Dharwars and the Peninsular Gneisses is

marked by a thrust (Murthy, 1982) all along the

margin, except in the northern part, as shown in

Fig. 8. According to Sen and Narasimha Rao

(1967), igneous activity in the Cuddapah basin

was restricted to the western half of the basin. To

the east of the Cuddapah basin lies the Eastern

7O 78’ 7

rO_ ’ 79O 80' 81'

' 10 0 1020304050Km ’

SCAtE

R.K. VERMA AND Y. SATYANARAYAMA

Ghats belt which runs mostly along the east coast

of India from Bhubaneswar on the northwest to

Cape Comorin in the south. The Eastern Ghats

are associated with a charnockite and khondalite

suite of rocks, mafic intrusives, anorthosites as

well as extensive granitisation and migmatisation

(Narayanaswamy, 1970).

Gravity field over the Cuddapah basin and its sur-

roundings

The Bouguer anomaly map of the Cuddapah

basin after Qureshy et al. (1968) is shown in Fig.

16’

I

7B"

-/ ClJDiAPAH BASIN

79O BOO

Fig. 9. Bouguer anomaly map of the Cuddapah basin and the adjoining areas (after Qureshy et al., 1968).

Page 11: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

GEOPHYSICAL STUDY OF CUDDAPAH BASIN AND DHARWAR CRATON, INDIA 347

9. The Cuddapah depression is well pronounced on the gravity anomaly map. The contours follow the shape of the basin to a large extent. Bouguer anomaly values are nearly - 100 mGal outside the western margin, rise to -60 mGal in the south- western part, fall again to -110 mGa1 near the eastern margin and rise to nearly -20 mGal over the Eastern Ghats.

A large gravity high situated in the southwest- em part of the basin is marked by a -60 mGal contour. This high has a general N-S trend, and has an amplitude of +40 mGal as compared to the surrounding regions, with a steep gradient over its flanks. This anomaly has been attributed to high-density trap rocks which are extensively found in the western part of the basin (Kaila and Bhatia, 1981; Mishra et al., 1985).

The gravity anomaly contours between the east- em margin of the basin and the east coast run more or less parallel to the eastern margin of the Cuddapah basin. There is a steep positive gradient near the contact of the basin to the Eastern Ghats. Here the Bouguer anomaly rises sharply from - 110 mGal over the eastern part of the Cudda- pah basin to -20 mGa1 over the Eastern Ghats (Fig. 9). It may be seen from Fig. 5 that the isostatic anomaly also rises sharply from - 90 mGal to -20 mGa1 in the same area. The steep gradient is probably due to a faulted contact be- tween the Eastern Ghats and the Dharwar Craton as suggested by Subrahmanyam and Verma (1986).

Gravity data alone do not give us adequate information concerning mass inhomogeneities lying in the crust. Recently, the DSS group of NGRI has shot two profiles across the Cuddapah basin, from Kavali to Pamapalle in the southern part and Alampur to Koniki and Ganapeswaram in the northern part of the basin (see Fig. 9). The results of these studies, reported by Kaila et al. (1979) and Tewari et al. (1986), have given great deal of information concerning the basin and the underlying crust, as well as the Moho along the two profiles. Interpretation of the gravity field along the Kavali-PamapalIe profile in the light of results obtained from DSS is discussed herewith.

Major features of the Kavali-Parnapalle DSS pro-

file

A crustal depth section along the Kavali- Parnapalle section of the Kavali-Udipi profile (after Kaila et al., 1979) is shown in Fig. 10.

The crustal depth section along the profile has been divided into eight blocks, numbered Z to VZZZ, which are separated by ten deep-seated faults and thrusts marked 2 to 10. These faults have been inferred on the basis of seismic reflection data, discontinuity of reflections or their absence. The Cuddapah basin lies between a large deep- seated fault numbered IO in the western margin and a low-angle thrust (fault 2) in the eastern margin of the basin (Fig. 10). Faulting in the Moho is a noticeable feature of the profile. In general, the Moho dips eastward, to the east of Pamapalle.

In the eastern part of the profile, block ZZ mostly constituting the Eastern Ghats, appears to have moved upwards with respect to the adjacent blocks Z and ZZZ, marked by a low-angle thrust. The Moho appears to have gone down underneath the Eastern Ghats along the Kavali-Pamapalle profile (Fig. 10). The basement underlying the sediments (having P-wave velocity of 5.8 km s-l), is well marked by the refraction segment with a velocity of 6.4 km s- ‘. It shows an eastward dip and is terminated along the eastern margin by a low-angle thrust. The maximum depth of the sedi- ments along the profile is found to be nearly 10 km near Maidukuru, where the basement has been downthrown along a deep-seated fault (7 in Fig. 10). The Moho underneath the basin is highly faulted, showing consistent downdip towards the east. The depth of the Moho varies from 35 km in the west to nearly 46 km underneath the Eastern Ghats.

Analysis of the gravity field along the Kavali- Parnapalle profile

The observed Bouguer anomaly along the Kavali-Pamapalle profile appears to be in- fluenced by several factors, including the sedi-

Page 12: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

-40

BOUG

UER

ANOM

ALY

(OBS

ERVE

D)

-60

J -8

0 -1

00

I ‘.

I ,

,

I- 40

n

c .

,

8.59

: -.

_i

,”

‘_m

^ __-

i

I \,

l- -

- 6G

--

-

J 60

cl

$0

SHO

T PO

INT

FAUL

T WI

TH

I _._

REF

LEC

TOR

SE

GM

ENTS

yh

R;;$

ONOF

1-

_1

ALL

UVI

UM

1 70

WIT

H BO

UNDA

RY

l-2-J

G

RAN

ITIC

VE

LOC

ITY(

KM

/SEC

) BA

SEM

ENT

m

$;y;

&TS

m

&~;

~;SL

’:N1~

;NE,

SSE

S

I 1”

CR

USTA

L B

LOC

K

@

MO

HO

BO

UNDA

RY

m

~;;~

;f$~

123

BASI

C IN

TRU

SIVE

S

r Y

I + a w

a

Fig.

10

. Si

mpl

ifie

d cr

usta

l de

pth

sect

ion

alon

g th

e K

aval

i-Pa

rnap

alle

pr

ofile

fr

om

DSS

ac

ross

th

e so

uthe

rn

part

of

th

e C

udda

pah

basi

n (a

fter

K

aila

et

al.,

19

79).

Page 13: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

DiST

ANCE

,KM

2.

40

220

200

o~~

,,,,,,

,l,,l,

,,,l,,

,,,,,,

reo

160

1LO

120

100

80

60

40

20

0 1

IO

EASTERN

6HAlS

AP

=-

0.3

s 6o

l-

70

I 60

70

80

90

* l .:*

.. I . -

s-

KU

RN

OO

LS

a

* -.

*.

.

R CU

DDAP

AHS

III ;:z

vT

DHAR

WAR

S BA

SIC

INTR

USI

VES

m

WIT

H AP

= 0.

15

g/m

3

HIG

H-D

ENSI

TY

LAYE

R W

ITH

BASI

C C

OM

PO

SIT

ION

I

UN

CLA

SSIF

IED

C

RYS

TALL

INE

GN

EISS

ES

Fig

. Il

. O

bser

ved

and

com

pute

d gr

avity

an

omal

ies

alon

g th

e K

aval

i-Pa

rnap

alle

pr

ofile

. C

urve

ar

e as

fa

llow

s:

I -o

bser

ved

Bou

guer

an

omal

y;

2 -A

iry-

&st

atic

an

omal

y (T

=

30

km);

j-

grav

ity

effe

ct

of

sedi

men

ts

com

pris

ing

the

Cud

dapa

h ba

sin

and

crus

tal

root

(e

xcee

ding

35

km

) ex

tend

ing

up

to

the

Moh

o,

us@

de

nsity

as

sh

own

in

the

figu

re

(the

conf

igur

atio

n of

th

e ba

sin

and

the

Moh

o ar

e as

pe

r D

SS

resu

lts),

4

-Bou

guer

an

omal

y co

rrec

ted f

or

the

sedi

men

ts,

Moh

o co

nfig

urat

ion

and

a hi

gh-d

ensi

ty

bloc

k un

dern

eath

th

e

Eas

tern

G

hats

; 5-

-ano

mal

y w

ith

corr

ectio

ns

sam

e as

fo

r cu

rve

4, w

ith

addi

tiona

l co

rrec

tion

for

a lo

w-d

ensi

ty

uppe

r m

antle

to

th

e w

est

of

Cud

dapa

h ba

sin

as s

how

n in

th

e fi

gure

; 6

-Bou

guer

an

omal

y w

ith

addi

tiona

l co

rrec

tion

for

a hi

gh-d

ensi

ty

laye

r/ba

sic

intr

usiv

e in

th

e lo

wer

cr

ust

in

the

wes

tern

pa

rt

of

the

Cud

dapa

h ba

sin

(thi

s cu

rve

satis

fies

th

e ob

serv

ed

grav

ity

fiel

d fa

irly

w

eil)

; 7-

isos

tatic

an

omal

y co

rrec

ted

for

the

effe

ct

of

sedi

men

ts

com

pris

ing

the

Cud

dapa

h ba

sin,

S

Page 14: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

350 R.K. VERMA ANDY. SATYANARAYAMA

ments of the Cuddapah basin and the Moho con-

figuration, as well as density variations within the

crust. The upper mantle density may also be a

contributing factor. Various factors which in-

fluence the gravity field were studied one by one.

Figure 11 shows the general configuration of

the Cuddapah basin and the Moho along the

Kavali-Pamapalle profile, along with the eleva-

tion, the surface geology and the observed Bouguer

(curve I ), as well as Airy isostatic anomaly (curve

2). The basin extends from SP 225 in the west to

nearly SP 80 in the east and has a maximum

thickness of nearly 10 km. Although the reflec-

tions from the Moho are not continuous, the gen-

eral configuration of Moho as shown in Fig. 11 is

consistent with the DSS results. In the absence of

these results (the basin as well as the Moho con-

figuration), several models could be constructed to

explain the observed gravity field. However, the

basin configuration as well as the Moho depth put

appreciable constraints on the acceptable models.

By applying corrections for the sediments and the

crustal root (> 35 km) the bias due to these fac-

tors can be removed.

Considering the velocity information available

from the DSS profiles, the density values of sedi-

ments, the underlying basement, average crust and

Moho were determined using the velocity-density

relationship given by Ludwig et al. (1970).

The sediments comprising the Cuddapah basin

show a lesser seismic wave velocity as compared to

the underlying basement. Hence these must be of

lower density as compared to the underlying

gneisses. The density contrast between the two

was estimated to be of the order of -0.1 g cmW3.

Using this value, the gravity effect of the sedi-

ments was computer (assuming a two-dimensional

model; Talwani et al., 1959) for the basin config-

uration as revealed by DSS.

Moho depth at sea level was assumed to be 35

km, as shown in the western part of the basin (Fig.

lo), where the average elevation is about 200 m

and the sediments are absent. The velocity func-

tion for the Kavali-Udipi profile (Kaila et al.,

1979; Kaila and Bhatia, 1981) as shown in Fig. 7

suggests that the lower-crustal density should be

of the order of 3.0 g cmp3. Assuming an upper-

mantle density of 3.3 g cmp3, the effect of crustal

root formation (exceeding 35 km depth) under-

neath the Cuddapah basin was computed, using a

density contrast of - 0.3 g cm-3 between the crust

and the mantle.

The combined effect of the sediments and the

Moho configuration is shown by curve 3 in Fig.

11 for the Kavali-Parnapalle profile. It is ob-

served that the combined effect of the sediments

and the Moho largely explains the observed

anomaly in the central part of the basin. However,

there are large discrepancies between curves 1 and

3 in the western part of the basin and to the east

of the basin (areas underlain by the Eastern

Ghats). The observed gravity field should be nearly

- 20 to - 30 mGa1 over the metamorphics to the

west of the basin, whereas it is nearly -80 mGa1.

In the eastern part (over the Eastern Ghats), the

gravity field is 50-60 mGa1 more positive as com-

pared to the computed values. It is apparent there-

fore that sediments and the Moho configuration

do not explain the observed gravity field along the

entire DSS profile.

It may be observed from Fig. 11 that, upon

correcting the isostatic anomaly for the effect of

sediments, the magnitude of this anomaly is con-

siderably reduced in the western part of the basin

(curve 7) but the anomaly does not disappear

entirely. The isostatic anomaly over the Eastern

Ghats remains more positive as compared to val-

ues over the Cuddapah basin. The geologically

corrected isostatic anomalies are relatively free

from any surface mass inhomogeneities and there-

fore should be attributed only to deeper causes.

This suggests that the overall density of the crust

underlying the Eastern Ghats should be higher

than that underneath the Cuddapah basin. As the

Eastern Ghats are a granulite belt, it is logical to

expect that these are underlain by a crust of

relatively higher density.

Keeping this in mind, a high-density crustal

block with a density contrast of +0.07 g cme3

underneath the Eastern Chats (as compared to the

crust underneath the Cuddapah basin) was as-

sumed and the gravity effect was computed. The

combined gravity effect of sediments, the crustal

root (exceeding 35 km thickness) and the Eastern

Ghats block is shown by curve 4 in Fig. 11. The

assumed high-density crustal block shows a low-

Page 15: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

GEOPHYSICAL STUDY OF CUDDAPAH BASIN AND DHARWAR CRATON. INDIA 351

angle thrust relationship with the Cuddapah sedi- ments as suggested by DSS results, and dips steeply towards the east. This block has a width of about 80 km at shallower depths and is relatively narrow (35-40 km) at a depth of about 35 km.

It may be mentioned here that the Eastern Ghats, a granulite terrain, is characterised by a gravity high all along its length (Subrahmanyam and Verma, 1986) and may represent a continental suture of Precambrian times. How this suture was evolved is difficult to envisage at present.

The decrease in the Bouguer anomaly further east, which may be due to alluvium along the east coast (Kaila and Bhatia, 1981), has not been con- sidered here. The assumed high-density crust in the eastern part can explain the observed gravity field in this area satisfactorily. However, a major discrepancy between the observed and the com- puted values in the western part remains.

As discussed earlier, the Bouguer anomaly map of the southern peninsula of India reveals the presence of appreciably large negative anomalies over the Peninsular Shield (see Fig. 3). At least a part of this anomaly appears to be of deep-seated origin, unrelated to near-surface features or the Moho configuration. In order to explain the large negative Bouguer anomaly, about -70 to - 80 mGal to the west of Cuddapah basin, the presence of a low-density upper mantle (Ap = - 0.06) ex- tending from a depth of about 35 km to 80-90 km has been invoked, as shown in Fig. 11. This low- density upper mantle, which may be a part of the lithosphere, appears to extend further to the west for a few hundred km (discussed in Part II). The combined gravity effect of sediments, the Moho configuration, high-density crust underneath the Eastern Ghats and a low-density upper mantle is shown by curve 5 (Fig. 11).

The gravity effects of sediments comprising the Cuddapah basin, the Moho configuration, the high-density crust underneath the Eastern Ghats and a low-density upper mantle accounts for most of the anomaly along the profile. However, a discrepancy of about + 35 mGal between the ob- served and computed values in the western part of the basin remains to be accounted for.

As mentioned earlier, Bouguer anomaly values rise from nearly - 90 to - 120 mGal over areas to

the west of the Cuddapah basin, to -60 mGa1 locally in the western part of the Cuddapah basin, where considerable evidence of igneous activity

has been seen geologically. In this area Kaila and Bhatia (1981) have inferred a thick basaltic layer underneath the Cuddapah sediments, on the basis of DSS results. Following this, the discrepancy between curve 5 and the observed anomaly (curve 1) has been explained in terms of a high-density (basic) crust with a density contrast of +0.05 g cmp3 with respect to the surroundings. This body lies at a depth of about lo-20 km below the sea level. This body might have been the source of basic intrusives found within the Cuddapah sedi- ments (see Figs. 8 and 11). The thickness of this body varies from 10 to 15 km, and it lies between Pamapalle in the west and Maidukuru in the east.

The gravity effect of basic intrusives within the ‘Cuddapah sediments has been computed using the assumed density contrast of +0.15 g cme3 with respect to the surrounding Cuddapah sediments. The intrusive bodies extend to a depth of about 3-5 km, dipping towards the east. The maximum gravity effect of intrusives was found to be about + 10 to + 14 mGa1, locally.

The combined gravity effect of sediments, crustal thickening (exceeding 35 km and extending down to Moho), a high-density crust underneath the Eastern Ghats, basic intrusives, a high-density crustal layer underneath the Cuddapah basin, and a low-density upper mantle to the west of Cud- dapah basin is shown by curve 6 in Fig. 11. The curve shows fairly good correlation with the ob- served gravity field. The analysis of the gravity field presented here is consistent with the major geological information available and the Moho configuration, as well as with the DSS results.

II. The gravity field over Dharwar Craton

Introductory remarks

The southern peninsula of India, south of the Deccan trap and to the west of the Cuddapah basin, is known as the Dharwar Craton. It is an important part of the Indian shield, being well known for greenstone-granite-gneiss association, and is a typical low-grade Archaean terrain

Page 16: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

352 R.K. VERMA AND Y. SATYANARAYAMA

1000 -

800 - 2z

.

5 600 - -

2

z w’ 400 -

. UDIPI - KAVALI

o KOYNA

UK-10 a

UK;14

K-90 UK-13

~~-15~~ ,' ,K-2

K- 4" ' KT5UK-'2 0

a UK-2

UK-l.

H,MOHO DEPTH , KM

Fig. 12. Average elevation vs Moho Depth relationship obtained for different blocks located along the Kavali-Udipi and Koyna I and II profiles; the average Moho depth at sea level is inferred to be 35 km, as discussed in the text.

(Swaminath et al., 1976; Naqvi et al., 1974, 1978).

It has a wide distribution of volcano-sedimentary

schist belts, such as Chitradurga, Shimoga, Sargur,

Kolar and others, as well as intrusive granites

surrounded by a vast Peninsular Gneiss complex.

Some workers believe that the Dharwars con-

stitute a nucleus around which continental growth

in the southern peninsula of India has taken place

(Pichamuthu, 1970). The Major geological features

of the Dharwar Craton are shown in Fig. 2.

Gravity field: general remarks

Gravity field over the Dharwar greenstone-

gneiss-granite terrain has been studied by Subrah-

manyam and Verma (1982). The field is char-

acterised by several highs and lows of short wave-

length. The highs, ranging from +lO to + 30

mGa1 in amplitude, are found to be generally

associated with syncline-filled volcano-sedimen-

tary sequences or greenstone belts, while lows

ranging from - 5 to - 20 mGa1 amplitude are

found over granite outcrops or granites concealed

underneath the gneisses.

Apart from near-surface geological features, the

gravity field is influenced to a large degree by

variations in crustal thickness. It is a well known

observation that in general, over continental areas,

as the elevation increases, the Moho depth in-

creases (Woollard, 1962) contributing to large

negative Bouguer anomalies. In order to examine

whether this is the case in the southern peninsular

shield we have plotted average elevation (i o x : o

areas) vs. Moho depth for different parts of the

Kavali-Udipi profile, as well as for the Koyna I

and II profiles (Kaila et al., 1979, 1981a, b). The

latter have been shot over the Deccan trap region,

as shown in Fig. 3. The relationship obtained is

shown in Fig. 12. The figure shows that, in gen-

eral, the Moho depth increases with elevation.

However, there is significant departure for points

which lie along the Eastern Ghats (UK-Z, UK-2

and UK-3, Fig. 13) where the Moho lies at a

depth of about 40-46 km for very low elevations.

The average Moho depth at sea level is expected

to be 34-35 km for crust of normal composition.

The minimum depth along the Kavali-Udipi pro-

file is about 34 km.

Parnapalle- Udipi section of the DSS profile

Figure 13 shows the observed Bouguer anomaly

(curve Z) along this section of the profile, which

extends from the western margin of the Cuddapah

Page 17: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

GEOPHYSICAL STUDY OF CUDDAPAH BASIN AND DHARWAR CRAl-ON, INDIA

( lQ3W) AlQWONV t13nmoa NOlltiI3i3 (WM) Hld3Q

+ . . . *I. eon + : x . . . + x : . .

Page 18: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

354 R.K. VERMA ANDY. SATYANARAYAMA

basin to the west coast of the Indian Peninsula.

Our present interest is to interpret the regional

gravity field, which is shown by curve 2 in the

same figure. The regional Bouguer anomaly shows

values of the order of - 100 to - 110 mGa1 near

the west coast. The values rise to nearly - 90

mGal in the central part of the area (near the

Closepet granite) and further increase to - 70

mGa1 in the eastern part of the area, near Pama-

palle. The possible causes of this regional varia-

tion are as follows: (a) variation in the crustal

thickness/Moho depth; (b) variation in crustal

density; (c) variation in the upper mantle density.

In order to examine the various factors, correc-

tion for crustal thickness/Moho depth variation

was applied to the observed gravity field. The

Moho depth as reported by DSS was used for this

purpose. As in the case of the Kavali-Pamapalle

profile (Fig. 11) a density contrast of -0.3 g

cm - 3 between the lower crust and the mantle was

assumed for this purpose. The anomaly corrected

for this factor is shown by curve 4 in Fig. 13.

It is apparent from this curve that the corrected

regional anomaly varies from - 90 mGa1 to - 40

mGa1 and lies at a level of about -60 to - 70

mGa1 over a large part of the profile. It is difficult

to explain such large anomalies of regional nature

in terms of crustal inhomogeneities. A large part

of this anomaly appears to be of deep-seated

origin. Curve 4 of Fig. 13 shows a broad high of

about +35 mGa1 amplitude lying over the

Schimoga schist belt, the Chitradurga schist belt

and the adjoining gneissose terrane, extending up

to the Closepet granite. Outlining this high, a

regional anomaly ZZ has been defined, as shown

by curve 5 in Fig. 13. This broad regional anomaly

has been interpreted in terms of a low-density

upper mantle (with a density contrast of -0.06 g

cmp3 with respect to its surroundings) underlying

this profile, extending from the Moho up to a

depth of about 70-90 km. The residual (ZZ)

anomaly, defined as the difference between curves

4 and 5, has been interpreted in terms of a high-

density crustal layer (Ap = +0.08 g cm-3), lying

at a depth of about lo-23 km below the surface in

the above-mentioned area. This high-density crust

could be related to the processes leading to the

evolution of the Dharwar schist belts, which con-

sist predominantly of volcano-sedimentary rocks.

A combined effect of crustal thickness variation, a

low-density upper mantle and a high-density

crustal layer can explain the observed regional

gravity field in this part of the DSS profile ade-

quately, as shown by curve 6 (Fig. 13).

implication of the model

The observed Bouguer anomaly is a cumulative

effect of mass inhomogeneities lying below sea

level at any depth within the lithosphere, the up-

per mantle or the asthenosphere. In order to at-

tribute the anomalies to sources at different de-

pths, information obtained from DSS is very help-

ful.

The appreciably large negative Bouguer anoma-

ly observed over large parts of the southern

Peninsula of India cannot be explained in terms of

a crustal root effect or variations in Moho depth.

A low-density upper mantle underlying large parts

of the southern peninsula can account for the

observed Bouguer as well as isostatic anomalies.

This feature extends from the western part of the

Cuddapah basin in the east up to the Western

Ghats in the west, along the Kavali-Udipi DSS

profile, and attains a thickness of the order of

40-55 km underneath the Western Ghats.

Recently, Ramakrishna Rao et al. (1989) have

studied the upper mantle structure in the sub-

crustal lithosphere in the southern Indian shield

from phase velocities of body waves, using data

for shallow earthquakes originating from the east

as well as the west coasts of India. The phase

velocity was measured by using well located

seismic stations set up by the National Geophysi-

cal Research Institute (NGRI). These studies show

that the upper mantle in the western part of the

southern Indian shield has lower velocities as

compared to that along the eastern part, the veloc-

ity contrast (in Pn) being of the order of 0.3-0.5

km s-l. These results strongly support ani-

sotropy/ inhomogeneity in the lithosphere of the

southern Indian shield. Since velocity contrast

represents density contrast as well, these results

support the presence of a lower-density upper

mantle, as inferred from gravity data.

Page 19: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

GEOPHYSICAL STUDY OF CUDDAPAH BASIN AND DHARWAR CRATON. INDIA 355

It may be recalled here that, as shown in Fig. 1, the geoid anomaly which is centered near Ceylon

covers a large part of the Indian Ocean and ex- tends over the southern part of the Indian Peninsula. The low-density upper mantle inferred from analysis of gravity data can explain the ob- served geoid anomaly to some extent. The origin of such a broad regional feature has to be ex- plained in terms of processes that have taken place over the Indian Peninsula and the surround- ing Indian Ocean since Tertiary times.

Over the Indian Peninsula, a major geological feature observed today is the Deccan volcanics, which presently cover an area of approximately 500,000 km2. The volcanics (also known as traps) have been dated as 59-62 m-y. in age (McElhinny, 1968). According to Krishnan (1960) the volcanics covered a much larger area, probably double the present size, during Eocene times. The Indian Ocean has been evolved mostly during the late Cretaceous to Present period (McKenzie and Sclater, 1971), as a result of the break-up of Gondwanaland. The Decqn trap eruptions have definitely taken place during the period of active drift of the Indian subcontinent, as revealed by palaeomagnetic studies (Klootwijk, 1979). It ap- pears that, as a result of these processes, convec- tion currents were generated in the deep mantle, resulting in mass inhomogeneity over large parts of the Indian Ocean and the surrounding region.

Bott (1987) and Ricard et al. (1989) have ex- plained the presence of a geoid low in the Indian Ocean and the surrounding region in terms of presence of deep convection currents in the man- tle. These currents result in mass inhomogeneities over large areas. It is possible that the convection current existing in the Indian Ocean is related to the processes leading to its evolution. The geoid anomaly is likely to exist for a few million years, since the convection currents are of deep-seated origin and may have very low velocities.

Snmmary of results

The gravity field over Southern Peninsular In- dia is characterised by large negative Bouguer as well as isostatic anomalies. The results of the DSS profile shot from Kavali along the east coast to

Udipi on the west coast of India (Kaila et al., 1979) enable us to interpret satisfactorily the large negative anomalies over Dharwar craton and the eastern and western parts of the Cuddapah basin, as well as the positive anomaly observed over the Eastern Ghats.

The large negative Bouguer and isostatic anomalies observed over the eastern part of the Cuddapah basin appear to be due to the effect of sediments, as well as the eastward dip of the Moho underneath the basin. In comparison, the appreciably positive Bouguer anomaly over the Eastern Ghats can be explained only in terms of a higher-density crustal block underlying the Ghats.

Analysis of the gravity field over the Dharwar Craton suggests that the large negative Bouguer anomaly is not caused by variations in the Moho or crustal density. A low-density upper mantle underlies a large part of the Dharwar Craton, contributing to Bouguer anomalies of the order of -60 to -70 mGal. It appears that similar condi- tions may prevail over large parts of the southern peninsular shield. To some extent, this can explain the large negative geoid anomaly observed over the Indian Ocean as well as the southern part of Indian Peninsula. It is inferred that the upper mantle underlying these areas is inhomogeneous, perhaps as a result of convection currents related to the evolution of the Indian Ocean.

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to S.K. Mitra for drafting the figures and to M.K. Roy for typing the manuscript.

References

Bott, M.H.P., 1987. Geoid anomalies, mantle convection, hot

spots and subduction zones. Paper presented at IUGG

Symposium, “Large-scale Three-dimensional Earth Struc-

ture”, Vancouver, Can., 1987.

Brown, C. and Girdler, R.W., 1980. Interpretation of African

gravity and its implication for the break up of the conti-

nents. J. Geophys. Res., 85: 64434455.

Fairhead, J.D., 1976. The structure of the lithosphere beneath

the Eastern rift, East Africa, deduced from gravity studies.

Tectonophysics, 30: 269-298.

Gaposchkin, E.M. and Lambeck, K., 1970. Smithsonian Stan-

dard Earth (II). Smithsonian Astrophys. Obs. Spec. Rep.

315 pp.

Page 20: Gravity field, deep-seismic sounding and crust-mantle structure over the Cuddapah basin and Dhawar Craton of India

356 R.K. VERMA AND Y. SATYANARAYAMA

Gaposchkin, E.M. and Lambeck, K., 1971. Earth’s gravity field

to the sixteenth degree and station coordinates from satel-

lite and terrestrial data. J. Geophys. Res., 76: 4855-4883.

Kahle, H.G. and Talwani, M., 1973. Gravimetric Indian Ocean

geoid. Z. Geophys., 39: 167-187.

Kaila, K.L. and Bhatia, S.C., 1981. Gravity study along

Kavali-Udipi Deep Seismic Sounding Profiles in the In-

dian Peninsular shield: some inferences about the origin of

anorthosites and Eastern Ghats orogeny. Tectonophysics,

79: 129-143.

Kaila, K.L., Roy Chowdhury, K., Reddy, P.R., Krishna, V.G.,

Hari Narain, Sobbotin, S.I., Sollogub, V.B., Chekunov,

A.V., Karechko, G.E., Lazarenko, M.A. and Ilchenko, T.V.,

1979. Crustal structure along Kavali-Udipi profile in the

Indian Peninsular shield from Deep Seismic Soundings. J.

Geol. Sot. India, 20: 307-333.

Kaila, K.L., Murthy, P.R.K., Rao, V.K. and Kharetchko, G.E.,

1981a. Crustal structure from Deep Seismic Sounding along

the Koyna II (Kelsi-Loni) profile in the Deccan Trap area,

India. Tectonophysics, 73: 365-384.

Kaila, K.L., Reddy, P.R., Dixit, M.M. and Lazarenko, M.A.,

1981b. Deep crustal structure at Koyna, Maharastra indi-

cated by Deep Seismic Soundings. J. Geol. SIX. India, 22:

I-16.

Klootwijk, CT., 1979. A review of palaeomagnetic data from

Indo-Pakistani fragment of Gondwanaland In: A. Farah

and K.A. DeJong (Editors), Geodynamics of Pakistan. Ge-

ological Survey of India, Quetta, pp. 41-80.

Krisbnan, M.S., 1960. Geology of India and Burma. Higgin-

bothams (Pvt.) Ltd., Madras, India, pp. 469-472.

Ludwig, W.J., Nafe, J.E. and Drake, C., 1970. Seismic refrac-

tion. In: A.E. Maxwell (Editor), The Sea, Vol. IV. Intersci-

ence, New York, N.Y., pp. 53-84.

McElhinny, M.W., 1968. Northward drift of India-examina-

tion of recent palaeomagnetic results. Nature, 217: 342-344.

McKenzie, D.P. and Sclater, J.G., 1971. The evolution of

Indian Ocean since the late Cretaceous. Geophys. J. R.

Astron. Sot., 25: 437-528.

Mishra, D.C., Laxaman, G., Rao, M.B.S.V. and Venka-

tacharyulu, M., 1985. 3-Dimensional model of magnetic

and gravity anomalies of Cuddapah (Proterozoic) basin.

Technical Report 85/235, NGRI, Hyderabad, India.

Murthy, Y.G.K., 1982. Geology of the Cuddapab basin: a

review. Fourth Workshop on “Status, Problems and Pro-

grammes in Indian Peninsular Shield”, Institute of Peninsu-

lar Geology, Hyderabad, pp. 51-2.

Naqvi, S.M., Divakar Rao, V., Narain, H., 1974. The proto-

continental growth of Indian shield and the antiquity of its

rift valleys. Precambrian Res., 1: 345-338.

Naqvi, S.M., Divakar Rao, V. and Narain, H., 1978. Primitive

crust: evidence from Indian shield. Precambrian Res., 6:

323-345.

Narayanaswami, S., 1970. Tectonic setting and manifestation

of the upper mantle in the Precambrian rocks of south

India. Proc. 2nd Symp. on Upper Mantle Project, NGRI,

Hyderabad pp. 375-403.

NGRI, 1975. Gravity Anomaly Maps of India. National Geo-

physical Research Institute, Hyderabad.

Pitchamuthu, C.S., 1970. The earth’s crust and upper mantle.

Proc. 2nd Symposium Upper Mantle Project. NGRI, pp.

25-38.

Qureshy, M.N., Krishna Brahmam, N., Aravamadhu, P.S. and

Naqvi, S.M., 1968. Role of granitic intrusions in reducing

the density of the crust and other related problems as

illustrated from a gravity study of the Cuddapah basin.

India. Proc. R. Sot. London, 304: 449-464.

Ramakrishna Rao, C.V., Gupta, H.K., Krishna, V.G. and

Gaur, V.K., 1989. Seismic structure of the sub-crustal litho-

sphere in the South Indian shield from body wave travel

times data for shallow earthquakes. Paper presented at

Symp. on “Structure and Dynamics of the Indian Litho-

sphere”, NGRI, Hyderabad, 1989.

Ricard, Y., Froidevoux, C. and Vigny, C., 1989. The deep

origin of the geoid low and plate motion in the Indian

lithosphere. Paper presented at Symposium on “Structure

and Dynamics of the Indian Lithosphere”, NGRI, Hyde-

rabad, February 1989.

Sen, S.N. and Narasimha Rao, Ch., 1967. Igneous activity in

the Cuddapah Basin and adjacent areas and suggestions on

the palaeogeography of the basin. In: Proceedings of sym-

posium on the Upper Mantle Project. NGRI, Publ. No. 8,

pp. 261-285.

Subrahmanyam, C. and Verma, R.K., 1982. Gravity interpreta-

tion of the Dharwar greenstone-gneiss-granite terrain in

the Southern Indian shield and its geological implications.

Tectonophysics, 84: 225-245.

Subrahmanyam, C. and Verma, R.K., 1986. Gravity field,

structure and tectonics of the Eastern Ghats. Tectonophys-

its, 126: 195-212.

Swaminath, J., Rama Krishnan, M. and Viswanath, M.N.,

1976. Dharwar stratigraphic model and Kamataka craton

evolution. Rec. Geol. Surv. India, 107: 149-175.

Talwani, M., Worzel, J.L. and Landisman M., 1959. Rapid

computations for two-dimensional bodies with application

to Mendocino Submarine fracture zone. J. Geophys. Res.,

64: 49-59.

Verma, R.K., 1985. Gravity Field, Seismicity and Tectonics of

Indian Peninsula and the Himalayas. Reidel, Dordrecht,

pp. 30-43.

Wollard, G.P., 1962. The relation of gravity anomalies to

surface elevation, crustal structure and geology. Report

62-9. University of Wisconsin, Geophysical Polar Research

Center.


Recommended