Home >Documents >Green Paradoxes: How Much Should We Worry? Ian Lange I-SEE

Green Paradoxes: How Much Should We Worry? Ian Lange I-SEE

Date post:28-Mar-2015
View:214 times
Download:1 times
Share this document with a friend
  • Slide 1

Green Paradoxes: How Much Should We Worry? Ian Lange I-SEE Slide 2 About me University of Washington (Seattle) PhD in Economics Internships with Fisheries Service around salmon conservation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Washington, D.C.) Economist for National Center for Environmental Economics; Climate Change Division; Office of Solid Waste University of Stirling Director, MSc in Energy Management Slide 3 Green Paradox (GP) Brought into academic and policy discussions by Sinn (2008) Fossil fuel suppliers incentive to extract resources is altered by environmental policy If policy is expected to reduce future profits, the supplier will want to extract sooner Like pistons in an engine, when one is depressed, others pops up Slide 4 Concerns The concern is that an environmental policy would emissions increase (over status quo) in the short term and environmental problems may be exacerbated Especially w.r.t to carbon dioxide emissions but also a concern with other pollutants Slide 5 Goal of Presentation Define GP and discuss scenarios where it may occur Discuss empirical tests of GP Discuss factors which may limit a GP in practice and how enlightened policy may take these into account Slide 6 Theory of Resource Extraction Goes back to Harold Hotellings seminal work in 1931 Owners of fossil fuel stocks arbitrage between expected price increase over time and return on financial assets to maximize profits If price will increase slower than expected, extract more now and invest in the financial asset Slide 7 Types of Policies for GP Mathematically, a GP could occur under four types of environmental policy (van der Werf & di Maria, 2011) Increasing pollution prices Lag in implementing policy Policy leakages Increased subsidy for fossil fuel replacement technology Slide 8 Demand Side The GP discussion assumes that the demand for the fossil fuel is allowed to expand as prices change However, many fossil fuel using industries are limited in how much and how quickly they can respond to price changes Slide 9 Limiting Factors Some examples include: Economies of Scale in Production Concurrent Regulations Structure of the Industry Procurement Strategies Sensitivity of Demand to Price Planning Consent/Permit to Operate Firm risk aversion w.r.t. new policies Slide 10 Test of GP The U.S. Acid Rain Program is used as a case study for an analysis of policy announcements on non-renewable resources Hypotheses tested Decrease in price Increased use of coal Substitution for high sulfur coal over low sulfur coal Slide 11 Case Study Acid Rain Program of the 1990 Clean Air Act National cap on SO 2 emissions Tradable permits to pollute Phase I 1995-1999: mandatory for 263 dirtiest, previously unregulated boilers Announced in November 1990, implemented in January 1995 for a subset of plants who are the treatment group Slide 12 Previous Regulation US Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1970 & 1977 New boilers subject to binding federal emissions or technology standards These plants have an emissions standard at the same rate as the allocation of permits in Phase II (2000-) Subsets of this group act as a control group for our treatment Slide 13 Test How did Phase I plants act in 1991-1994 relative to Phase II plants? Phase II plants are the proxy for how Phase I plants would have acted if the Acid Rain Program were not announced Slide 14 Results Some evidence of a green paradox Prices did seem to fall However, no increased use or increase in sulfur content Except for plants which rely heavily on the spot market Some factors which limit GP tested for Procurement method and concurrent regulations seem to be associated with limiting GP Slide 15 Limiting Factors The one test of GP that is available does not find much support What factors could be limiting the increased use of fossil fuels on the Supply side Demand side Slide 16 Supply side limiting factor Economies of scale in production Coal Surface mining requires large capital investment that is only worthwhile if operating continuously U.S., Australia are biggest surface mining countries Slide 17 Economies of Scale Petroleum Offshore oil extraction is similar Riglund et al (2008) show only North America region can increase rig activity when petroleum prices change North America has mainly onshore wells and more flexible subsurface regulations Slide 18 Demand Limiting Factors Concurrent regulation All fossil fuels emit multiple pollutants, with each one being independently regulated Coal Particulates, Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide Petroleum Carbon Dioxide, Volatile Organic Compounds, Nitorgen Oxides Slide 19 Concurrent Regulation Examples Include Low Emission Zones in EU Ambient Air Quality Standards in U.S. CO 2 Road Tax Nitrogen Oxides/Sulfur Dioxide Tradable permit schemes Slide 20 Structure of Industry Electricity Supply curve is a step-function with each step denoted by different technology thus limiting opportunities to increase production Coal is unlikely to displace nuclear or renewables in the merit order due to differences in costs of operating and ability to turn off and on Slide 21 Structure of Industry Petroleum/Gasoline Refining process can be a bottleneck to increase gasoline consumption U.S. Refiner Utilization from EIA Slide 22 Procurement Strategies Many energy firms procure their fossil fuel under relatively long-term forward contract Coal market averages around 2-3 years in Europe and 5-7 in US Restricts how much an energy firm can alter consumption Slide 23 Sensitivity of Demand to Price Most uses of fossil fuels have low price sensitivity Electricity (Reiss and White, 2005) Heat (Davis, 2011) Vehicle Miles Travelled (Spiller and Stephens, 2012) Thus a lower price does not lead to a large increase in use in the short run Slide 24 Planning/permit to Operate Increased use of resource may be limited by inability to site new plants or requirement to disclose compliance plans The GP is likely to occur when reduced price of fossil fuels leads to investment in new plants Slide 25 Risk Aversion Firms often limit their actions based on concern for public/regulators reaction Borenstein et al. (2012) show that regulated natural gas firms systematically limit their gas trades to ensure less regulatory oversight Rose (1997) show that power plants operated with a self-sufficient strategy w.r.t Acid Rain Program Slide 26 Enlightened Policy May include support for renewables and electric/hybrid vehicles as this meshes with structure of industry and concurrent regulation limiting factors May limit new leases due to the scale economies in the coal and oil industry GP-related extraction is likely to occur in new mines/wells Slide 27 Thanks Questions? Ian Lange [email protected]@stir.ac.uk Slide 28 What can this case tell us about climate policy? Policy in this analysis concerns acid rain, its outcome can provide information on climate policy Majority of emissions for both policies from non-renewable resource Similar abatement options for both policies (switching to low-sulfur/carbon coals) Electric power sector a large percentage of total emissions for both pollutants Tradable permits the instrument used/likely to be used in both cases Slide 29 Treatment vs Control The treatment group is Phase I plants The control group varies but generally Phase II plants in states that have a Phase I plant is used Plants subject to 1977 CAAA (known as NSPS-Da) are required to have a scrubber thus would have no/little need to respond to Acid Rain Program Slide 30 Data Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Form 423: Monthly Cost and Quality of Fuels for Electric Power Plants All coal-fired plants bigger than 50 MW Sample: 1986-1994 Other data taken from FERC Form 767 Federal Reserve Economic Data Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Review Slide 31 Heat Statistics Slide 32 Sulfur Content Statistics

Popular Tags:

Click here to load reader

Embed Size (px)