+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A … › wp-content › uploads › 2014 ›...

Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A … › wp-content › uploads › 2014 ›...

Date post: 05-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
9
Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A Neighbourhood: Theory And Guidelines Ar.I.Chandramathy, M.Arch [Department of Architecture, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai] Dr.JinuLouishidhaKitchley, PhD [Department of Architecture, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai] ABSTRACT Cities and rural environments differ substantially in their land surface temperature, which leads to urban heat island effect (UHI). Cities have a dynamic relationship with the microclimate. Landscaping is one of the most effective passive design strategy compared to other passive design strategies in mitigating the UHI effect. The degree of 'greenery' or 'greenness' (Green space factor) is usually defined and measured as the percentage of total urban area that is devoted to open green spaces. The higher the percentage of green cover, the greener that particular city becomes. National forest policy, India states that a 20% to 33% of green cover is considered to be fairly good. The green spaces help to alter the temperature, reduce the urban heat island effect and improve the air quality. In most cities, concentrated vegetation is seen only in parks or recreational spaces. This lowers temperatures on the microclimate of the park but does not have any effect on the microclimate of the neighbouring built environments. By placing vegetation within the built space of the urban fabric, the effect of UHI effect can be reduced where people live, work and spend most of their lives. Such approaches have been investigated in the fields of planning, urban design, landscape architecture, environmental engineering. Selection of right plant in the right place can be based on many aspects such as its thermal performance. It further depends on various plant typologies and their characteristics which will have significant role in urban heat balances by reducing the land surface temperature and reduce energy consumptions in the dense built up areas. It also helps to improve the microclimate performance in the built environment and also create a visually appealing environment compared to other passive techniques. This paper describes the importance of relationship between green space factor and microclimate and implementation of these guidelines in a neighbourhood with various case examples from research papers, literature and theories. The study has been carried out with on site observation and Envimet simulation methods. Keywords: urban heat island, green space factor, green spaces, Envimet 1. INTRODUCTION Climate, buildings, and green spaces have been explored worldwide by many researchers due to their interesting interrelationships and significant impacts to the environment. In recent years, urban heat island effects(UHI), induced by urban form, anthropogenic heat from buildings and Air conditioning systems have been studied extensively in cities around the world (1). Since the mid twentieth century, the global surface temperature has increased by 0.7±0.18°C during the 100 years ended in 2005. Thus the increased temperature is connected with increase in UHI through expansion of built up areas and populated area. The heat island during daytime increases rapidly and takes 3-5 hours to reach the 30th INTERNATIONAL PLEA CONFERENCE 16-18 December 2014, CEPT University, Ahmedabad 1
Transcript
Page 1: Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A … › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 12 › Poster_PA... · 2014-12-24 · greenery reduce the surface temperature and

Green Space Factor In Modifying The

Microclimates In A Neighbourhood:

Theory And Guidelines

Ar.I.Chandramathy, M.Arch

[Department of Architecture, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai]

Dr.JinuLouishidhaKitchley, PhD

[Department of Architecture, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai]

ABSTRACT

Cities and rural environments differ substantially in their land surface temperature, which leads to

urban heat island effect (UHI). Cities have a dynamic relationship with the microclimate. Landscaping

is one of the most effective passive design strategy compared to other passive design strategies in

mitigating the UHI effect. The degree of 'greenery' or 'greenness' (Green space factor) is usually defined

and measured as the percentage of total urban area that is devoted to open green spaces. The higher the

percentage of green cover, the greener that particular city becomes. National forest policy, India states

that a 20% to 33% of green cover is considered to be fairly good. The green spaces help to alter the

temperature, reduce the urban heat island effect and improve the air quality. In most cities, concentrated

vegetation is seen only in parks or recreational spaces. This lowers temperatures on the microclimate of

the park but does not have any effect on the microclimate of the neighbouring built environments. By

placing vegetation within the built space of the urban fabric, the effect of UHI effect can be reduced

where people live, work and spend most of their lives. Such approaches have been investigated in the

fields of planning, urban design, landscape architecture, environmental engineering. Selection of right

plant in the right place can be based on many aspects such as its thermal performance. It further

depends on various plant typologies and their characteristics which will have significant role in urban

heat balances by reducing the land surface temperature and reduce energy consumptions in the dense

built up areas. It also helps to improve the microclimate performance in the built environment and also

create a visually appealing environment compared to other passive techniques. This paper describes the

importance of relationship between green space factor and microclimate and implementation of these

guidelines in a neighbourhood with various case examples from research papers, literature and theories.

The study has been carried out with on site observation and Envimet simulation methods.

Keywords: urban heat island, green space factor, green spaces, Envimet

1. INTRODUCTION

Climate, buildings, and green spaces have been explored worldwide by many researchers due to

their interesting interrelationships and signif icant impacts to the environment. In recent years, urban heat

island effects(UHI), induced by urban form, anthropogenic heat from buildings and Air conditioning

systems have been studied extensively in cities around the world (1). Since the mid twentieth century,

the global surface temperature has increased by 0.7±0.18°C during the 100 years ended in 2005. Thus

the increased temperature is connected with increase in UHI through expansion of built up areas and

populated area. The heat island during daytime increases rapidly and takes 3-5 hours to reach the

30th INTERNATIONAL PLEA CONFERENCE 16-18 December 2014, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

1

Page 2: Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A … › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 12 › Poster_PA... · 2014-12-24 · greenery reduce the surface temperature and

maximum after sunset. These increased temperatures have implications on electricity, energy

consumption and use of resources which inturn affect the environment. The most sustainable solution to

these energy and environment problems is following more natural passive cooling techniques. Urban

green spaces can directly or indirectly affect local and regional air quality by modifying the urban

climates. Many studies have highlighted how landscape in urban des ign and planning can improve

microclimate and thermal comfort (2). Plant processes such as photosynthesis, Evapotranspiration helps

to reduce the Mean radiant temperature and anthropogenic heat generated from the buildings which leads

to urban heat island effect. This in turn reduces the cooling load of the buildings. The environmental

conditions of urban green space have significant impact on the comfort conditions experienced ins ide

them especially in seasons of stressful climate and the development of sustainability in cities(6). Many

researchers agreed that plants have an effect on the urban temperature and the cooling loads of building

(6, 8). For instance the air temperature distribution was closely related to the distribution of greenery in

the urban areas where for some large urban park, the ambient temperature was 2-3°C lower than

surrounding built-up areas and it shapes a pleasant urban environment (14). Furthermore, the effects of

plants density, plants species, plants distribution and large space of greenery give a large impact, where

greenery reduce the surface temperature and urban heat effect (11). Green interventions in terms of trees,

shrubs, ground covers, green roofs, bioswales or rain gardens, green walls, permeable pavement may be

adopted to achieve comfort and reduce UHI in urban areas. These green interventions are to be

quantif ied to achieve the specific green space factors. The main objective of this study is to find the

effect of the green space factors in modifying the microclimate.

2. GREEN SPACE FACTOR CONCEPT

In the literature reviewed, the primary metric used to mesure the percentage of green spaces under

the land cover based on the plant types such as lawns, turfs, shrubs and trees are their biological

parameters such as LAI – Leaf area intensity, LAD – Leaf area density. There are several benefits

associated by incorporating plants in the neighbourhood. There are remarkable efforts being made at

different scales for the different types of green space factors which are developed across the world.

Table 1 shows the examples of such initiatives across the world; California’s attempt to reduce C02

emissions by 25% by 2020 (5); Vancouver’s Eco- Density initiative (7); Portland’s effort to reduce

stormwater runoff (1); from an urban landscaping viewpoint, Biotope Area Factor (3), Seattle’s Green

Factor (10) Green Plot Ratio (15), and Malmo Green Space Factor (9), which discusses the usefulness of

various Green Factor. These green rating systems are designed to examine the relationship between the

Green factors or the landscape elements and their performance in the built environment. The green factor

systems are designed to increase the quantity and quality of planted areas while allowing the flexibility

for developers and designers to meet development standards. These studies deal the metric of green

spaces at the scales from one dimension to three dimensions but there is no evidence whether these

metrics are climatically sound. This study analyses the performance of these green space factors.

3 METHODOLOGY

Methods to study the green space factor in modifying the microclimate include both numerical

modeling and empirical analys is, such as using on site measurements using instruments and weather data

obtained from nearest weather stations. With empirical data, the study can be more specific, but have

limitations on time and space. Thus, to have a theoretical understanding of performance of different

vegetation scenarios and their effects on the microclimate, numerical modeling with on site observations

is required. The simulation has been carried out with the help of Envi-met models and simulated

alongwith initial onsite observation which was conducted on 20.03.2014 for the climate monitoring and

the plant distribution was accounted. In this paper, different scenario such as (i) with existing base case,

(ii) nil vegetation, (iii) with turfs and (iv) with trees was selected to assess the air temperature. For the

selected sites, the green plot ratio (15) has been applied and evaluated for its performance on the

microclimate.

30th INTERNATIONAL PLEA CONFERENCE 16-18 December 2014, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

2

Page 3: Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A … › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 12 › Poster_PA... · 2014-12-24 · greenery reduce the surface temperature and

Table 1. Green metrics and policies used around the world(15)

Category of

metric

Place Green metric Goals Description and

characteristics

Year

One

dimensional

Inventory of

plants

To increase the number

of plants

The number of plants

being managed in an

area. Simple to use for

homogenous or

hetrogenous plant

populations. Does not

provide information

on plant species

Two

dimensional

Berlin Biotope Area

factor

Retain high densities of development, whilst also developing the city’s green infrastructure

Attempts to account

for various types of

ecologically effective

or environmentally

friendly green systems

1994

Malmo Greenspace

Factor

Increase of green space per inhabitant from 33m

2 to 48m

2

in the urban area and increase the area of accessible green space in the countryside from 2% to 33%

Quantif ies the planting

area. Does not account

for vertical stacking.

2001

Portland Portland’s

Green

Building

Policy

All new City-owned facilities to include an eco-roof systems

Advancement in green roofs design to include an eco-roof with at least 70% coverage

2005

Vancouver Eco-Density Building green liveable and affordable Communities

Cities’ densification

systems

2006

California

California

Global

Warming

Solutions

Act

of 2006(5)

Reduce GHG emissions

in the state to1990

levels (25%) by 2020,

and 80%

below 1990 levels by

2050

2007

Seattle Green Factor New developments in commercially zoned areas must commit 30% of the parcel area to urban landscaping

Attempts to account

for various types of

ecologically effective

or environmentally

friendly green systems

2007

Three

dimensional

Singapore Green Plot

Ratio

Greening the buildings

in cities

Sum of total leaf area

developed in the s ite

divided by the s ite

area. Better correlation

with the

environmental

performance of

greenery

2003

30th INTERNATIONAL PLEA CONFERENCE 16-18 December 2014, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

3

Page 4: Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A … › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 12 › Poster_PA... · 2014-12-24 · greenery reduce the surface temperature and

3.1 AREA OF STUDY

Madurai is the oldest inhabited city in the Indian peninsula and is referred as Kadambavanam

(forest filled with kadamba trees) at the banks of river vaigai. Madurai city has an area of 52 km², within

an urban area now extending over as much as130 km², and it is located from 9°56′N to 9.93°N Latitude

and from 78°07′E to 78.12°E Longitude. It has an average elevation of 101 meters above mean sea level.

The climate is hot and humid, with rains during October to December. Summer temperatures range

between 40 and 26.3 degrees Celsius. Winter temperatures range between 29.6 and 18 degrees Celsius.

The average rainfall is about 85 cm and the average humidity is 65%.

The impact of green spaces on the urban heat isalnd is more comprehensive if supported by the

appropriate green space factors. The urbanization in Madurai has rapidly increased and has also

increased land surface temperature of Madurai since 1990 to 2001. To substantiate this, study has been

done with Land use patterns for 1991 and 2001 (Figure 1&2) and land surface temperature maps

(Figure3&4) were prepared by using 1990 TM image and 2001 ETM+ image. Land surface temperature

type indicates; “red and orange” with average temperature of 43.9°C and 41.9°C respectively for

urbanized area a with a greater density of buildings and paved surfaces that absorb and retain heat from

the sun, “yellow” with average temperature of 38.9°C for urbanized area a with a medium density of

buildings and paved surfaces that absorb and retain heat from the sun, “green” with average temperature

of 36.9°C for urban green areas, and “blue” with average temperature of 30.9°C for water bodies. This

map shows that urbanization has spread rapidly from year 2001 especially in the central business district

of Madurai. This rapid urbanization has contributed to the increase of urban temperature in Madurai.

This map also shows how extremely green spaces are replaced by the grey spaces without considering

the impact of huge loss of green space to the urban environment. Therefore, this study has examined the

potential of green space factor in modifying the microclimate. Urban neighbourhoods was selected with

dense (Study area 1 – Railway colony) and sparse vegetation (Study area 2 - Periyar) as shown in Figure

5 and compared with hypothetical conditions with mentioned scenarios and has been studied for their

Figure 1 Land use pattern Figure 2 Land use pattern

Figure 3 LST in 1991TM image. Source - Author Figure 4 LST in 2001 ETM+ image. Source - Author

30th INTERNATIONAL PLEA CONFERENCE 16-18 December 2014, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

4

Page 5: Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A … › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 12 › Poster_PA... · 2014-12-24 · greenery reduce the surface temperature and

microclimatic performance is studied using micro scale model ENVIMET (4) due to its advanced

approach on plant atmosphere interactions in cities. The numerical model simulates the complex urban

structures with resolution between 0.5m and 10m according to the position of sun, urban geometry,

vegetation, and soil by solving thermodynamic and plant physiological equations

Figure 5 Study areas. Source: Google Images

3.2 Model and its validation

Envi-met Version 3.1 (Bruse 2013) has been employed to simulate the potential impact of urban

form and vegetation on the urban microclimate for March 20, 2014, during mid summer day when peak

temperature is experienced. Envi-met is a three dimensional computational fluid dynamics and energy

balance model that simulates plant air interactions in urban environments with a typical horizontal

resolution of 0.5m to 10m in space and 10 seconds in time for built environment from microclimate scale

to local climate scale at any location. Although Envi-met mainly uses a 3D prognostic model, it also uses

1D models to transfer all data input for wind speed, wind direction, air temperature, relative humidity,

specific humidity and turbulence quantities (Bruse 2004). In order to conduct the simulation, basic data

about the location, cloud cover conditions, initial temperature, wind speed at 10m above ground level,

specific humidity at 2500m and relative humidity at 2m are required. In addition, the initial temperature,

soil temperature (at 0m-0.2m, 0.2m-0.5m, 0.5m-2m), heat transmission in walls and roofs of buildings

can also be defined in the mentioned model. The model gives a large number of output data that include

air temperature, surface temperature, wall temperature, long wave radiation, shortwave radiation, latent

and sensible heat fluxes, PMV, PPD, and MRT as the indicators of outdoor thermal comfort. In order to

achieve realistic results, a simulation of an existing urban area in Madurai was carried out and the results

were compared with on-site measurement temperature (1300LST on 20th March 2014) as shown in

Figure 6. Envi-met was carried out for a 24 hour period starting at 0600LST with model output for every

60 minutes, using the configuration parameters. The relationship of both results was found to be

correlated with an R-squared value equal to 0.876 (Figure 6). The verification process further

rationalizes the use of ENVI-met to study the microclimatic issues in Madurai with hot and humid

climatic conditions.

4 RES ULTS AND DISCUSS IONS

Envi-met s imulation was conducted for both the selected areas and the results reveal that the

green spaces play a major role in modifying the microclimate.

1

2

2

30th INTERNATIONAL PLEA CONFERENCE 16-18 December 2014, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

5

Page 6: Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A … › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 12 › Poster_PA... · 2014-12-24 · greenery reduce the surface temperature and

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case2 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 304.61 K

304.61 bis 304.80 K

304.80 bis 304.99 K

304.99 bis 305.17 K

305.17 bis 305.36 K

305.36 bis 305.55 K

305.55 bis 305.74 K

305.74 bis 305.93 K

305.93 bis 306.12 K

über 306.12 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

<Left foot> <Right foot>

basecase 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 305.13 K

305.13 bis 305.40 K

305.40 bis 305.66 K

305.66 bis 305.93 K

305.93 bis 306.20 K

306.20 bis 306.46 K

306.46 bis 306.73 K

306.73 bis 307.00 K

307.00 bis 307.27 K

über 307.27 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case1 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 304.96 K

304.96 bis 305.22 K

305.22 bis 305.49 K

305.49 bis 305.76 K

305.76 bis 306.02 K

306.02 bis 306.29 K

306.29 bis 306.55 K

306.55 bis 306.82 K

306.82 bis 307.09 K

über 307.09 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case5 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 304.75 K

304.75 bis 304.98 K

304.98 bis 305.21 K

305.21 bis 305.43 K

305.43 bis 305.66 K

305.66 bis 305.89 K

305.89 bis 306.11 K

306.11 bis 306.34 K

306.34 bis 306.57 K

über 306.57 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case2 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 304.61 K

304.61 bis 304.80 K

304.80 bis 304.99 K

304.99 bis 305.17 K

305.17 bis 305.36 K

305.36 bis 305.55 K

305.55 bis 305.74 K

305.74 bis 305.93 K

305.93 bis 306.12 K

über 306.12 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

<Left foot> <Right foot>

basecase 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 305.13 K

305.13 bis 305.40 K

305.40 bis 305.66 K

305.66 bis 305.93 K

305.93 bis 306.20 K

306.20 bis 306.46 K

306.46 bis 306.73 K

306.73 bis 307.00 K

307.00 bis 307.27 K

über 307.27 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case1 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 304.96 K

304.96 bis 305.22 K

305.22 bis 305.49 K

305.49 bis 305.76 K

305.76 bis 306.02 K

306.02 bis 306.29 K

306.29 bis 306.55 K

306.55 bis 306.82 K

306.82 bis 307.09 K

über 307.09 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case5 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 304.75 K

304.75 bis 304.98 K

304.98 bis 305.21 K

305.21 bis 305.43 K

305.43 bis 305.66 K

305.66 bis 305.89 K

305.89 bis 306.11 K

306.11 bis 306.34 K

306.34 bis 306.57 K

über 306.57 K

4.1 AVERAGE AIR TEMPERATURE

Figure 7 shows the average air temperature for different scenarios such as (i) with existing base

case, (ii) nil vegetation, (iii) with turfs and (iv) with trees. Figure 8 shows the average air temperature for

different scenarios such as (i) with existing base case, (ii) nil vegetation, (iii) with less number of trees

and (iv) with increased number of trees since providing turf or lawns is not possible in this case as it has

dense urban pattern with wall to wall construction.

Existing base case

Scenario 1

Scenario 2

Scenario 3

Figure 7 Air temperature for different scenarios for study area 1

Figure 6. The relationship between ENVI-met simulation temperature and onsite

measurement temperature (1 pm on 20th March 2014).

30th INTERNATIONAL PLEA CONFERENCE 16-18 December 2014, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

6

Page 7: Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A … › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 12 › Poster_PA... · 2014-12-24 · greenery reduce the surface temperature and

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

50

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case1h3g3 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 308.25 K

308.25 bis 308.55 K

308.55 bis 308.85 K

308.85 bis 309.14 K

309.14 bis 309.44 K

309.44 bis 309.74 K

309.74 bis 310.03 K

310.03 bis 310.33 K

310.33 bis 310.63 K

über 310.63 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

50

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case1h3g3 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 308.25 K

308.25 bis 308.55 K

308.55 bis 308.85 K

308.85 bis 309.14 K

309.14 bis 309.44 K

309.44 bis 309.74 K

309.74 bis 310.03 K

310.03 bis 310.33 K

310.33 bis 310.63 K

über 310.63 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

50

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case1h3 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 308.39 K

308.39 bis 308.68 K

308.68 bis 308.96 K

308.96 bis 309.25 K

309.25 bis 309.54 K

309.54 bis 309.82 K

309.82 bis 310.11 K

310.11 bis 310.40 K

310.40 bis 310.68 K

über 310.68 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

50

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case1h3 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 308.39 K

308.39 bis 308.68 K

308.68 bis 308.96 K

308.96 bis 309.25 K

309.25 bis 309.54 K

309.54 bis 309.82 K

309.82 bis 310.11 K

310.11 bis 310.40 K

310.40 bis 310.68 K

über 310.68 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

50

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case1h3g2 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 308.12 K

308.12 bis 308.40 K

308.40 bis 308.68 K

308.68 bis 308.97 K

308.97 bis 309.25 K

309.25 bis 309.54 K

309.54 bis 309.82 K

309.82 bis 310.10 K

310.10 bis 310.39 K

über 310.39 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

50

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case1h3g2 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 308.12 K

308.12 bis 308.40 K

308.40 bis 308.68 K

308.68 bis 308.97 K

308.97 bis 309.25 K

309.25 bis 309.54 K

309.54 bis 309.82 K

309.82 bis 310.10 K

310.10 bis 310.39 K

über 310.39 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

50

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case1h3g1 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 308.01 K

308.01 bis 308.30 K

308.30 bis 308.58 K

308.58 bis 308.87 K

308.87 bis 309.15 K

309.15 bis 309.43 K

309.43 bis 309.72 K

309.72 bis 310.00 K

310.00 bis 310.29 K

über 310.29 K

X (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50

Y (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

50

<Left foot> <Right foot>

case1h3g1 13:00:00 20.03.2014x/y cut at z= 3

N

Pot. Temperature

unter 308.01 K

308.01 bis 308.30 K

308.30 bis 308.58 K

308.58 bis 308.87 K

308.87 bis 309.15 K

309.15 bis 309.43 K

309.43 bis 309.72 K

309.72 bis 310.00 K

310.00 bis 310.29 K

über 310.29 K

Existing

base case

Scenario 1

Scenario 2

Scenario 3

Figure 8 Air temperature for different scenarios for study area 2

4.2 APPLICATION OF GREEN SPACE FACTORS

Green plot ratio (GnPR) by Ong (2003) was known as an effective green assessment method to

determine the ratio of green space distribution. According to Ong (2003), the GnPR has been defined as

the average leaf area index (LAI) of the greenery on the site and also can be equivalently defined as the

ratio of the total single-side leaf area of the planted landscape to the plot or site area. GnPR can be define

as the area-weighted average LAI of a site, which account for unequal amount of area occupied by

different plants in a landscape. Leaf area index can be defined as one-sided area of leaf tissue per unit

ground surface area where the green plot ratio is the only green assessment method that relies on LAI.

For the selected sites, the green plot ratio (15) has been applied and s imulated alongwith initial

onsite observation which was conducted on 20.03.2014 for the climate monitoring and the plant

distribution was accounted. This on site observation was only focused on the study areas, Madurai and

during the observation the temperature found to be 31°C with clear sky conditions.

In this study the green plot ratio have been considered for all the scenarios as shown in equation 1.

The green plot ratio have been carried out as following; existing base case, scenario (i) with no

vegetation of 0 green area factor, scenario (ii) with lawn of green factor 0.304 and scenario (iii) only

trees of green area factor 0.304 had impact on the reduction of temperatures. The calculations,

assumptions, and results were given in Table 2 and 3.

Based on the understanding of the parametric study and Green space factor, the following key

observations were found as given in Figure 7 and 8 which can be useful for urban planners.

First, greening is benefic ial in cooling the urban environment and creating better urban

microclimatic conditions for human activities at the ground level.

Second, tree planting is more beneficial than turfs or lawns (where trees provide shade for the

lawns, to other vegetations and buildings) as evident from the study.

It also suggests that the green factor of above 0.45 is essential to reduce a maximum of 2°C in the

built environment. Whereas in the study area 2 the temperature is reduced a maximum of only 1°C.

30th INTERNATIONAL PLEA CONFERENCE 16-18 December 2014, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

7

Page 8: Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A … › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 12 › Poster_PA... · 2014-12-24 · greenery reduce the surface temperature and

This also shows that the green factor of maximum 0.34 is not sufficient as it reduces about only

1°C and green factor of above 0.45 is as essential as to reduce a maximum of 2°C in the built

environment.

Table 2.Green plot ratio conditions and ENVImet parametric results for study area 1

Table 3.Green plot ratio conditions and ENVImet parametric results study area 2

5 CONCLUS ION

Design strategies for open spaces and landscape in a site development not only require to

accommodate their density in the s ite development standards, but also it plays an important role in

modifying the microclimate and create thermal comfort since it controls the access of sun, light and

wind. The microclimatic effect of the Green area factors were done with Envimet Numerical model. This

has been done considering only the lawns and the trees. The results shows that trees perform better then

the turfs or lawns. This lead to further investigate and develop green space factors for the thermal

comfort conditions outdoors, based on the empirical data and numerical modeling. This Green space

factor when included and applied in Madurai will help the Urban Designers, Planners and Landscape

architects to decide on the percentage of green space to be included in the city which can create

comfortable environment even in the urban neighbourhoods which is now available in the large urban

open spaces such as parks alone. This further helps to reduce the UHI in the city which in reduce the

energy consumption in the buildings.

Existing Base

Case Recorded

with outdoor

weather

monitoring

station.

Existing

Base Case

Simulated

with

Envimet

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Total site area 12800 12800 12800 12800 12800

Total landscape

area

6000 6000 NIL 1950 3900

Trees 40 40 NIL NIL 25

Palms NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

Shrubs NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

Turfs NIL NIL NIL 1950 NIL

Green Plot Ratio 0.468 0.468 0 0.304 0.304

Average

Temperature

found byENVImet

32.67°C

32.87°C 34.02°C 33.84°C 33.32°C

Existing Base

Case Recorded

with outdoor

weather

monitoring

station.

Existing

Base Case

Simulated

with

Envimet

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Total site area 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000

Total landscape

area

1440 1440 NIL 2640 3600

Trees 6 6 NIL 11 15

Palms NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

Shrubs NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

Turfs NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

Green Plot Ratio 0.144 0.144 0 0.264 0.36

Average

Temperature

found byENVImet

37.8°C

37.98°C 38.1°C 37.54°C 37.24°C

30th INTERNATIONAL PLEA CONFERENCE 16-18 December 2014, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

8

Page 9: Green Space Factor In Modifying The Microclimates In A … › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 12 › Poster_PA... · 2014-12-24 · greenery reduce the surface temperature and

6 REFERENCES

1. Arnfield, A. J. (2003). Two decades of urban climate research: A review of turbulence,

exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. International Journalof Climatology,

23(1), 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.859

2. Ali-Toudert F, Mayer H. 2007. Effects of asymmetry, galleries, overhanging façades and

vegetation on thermal comfort in urban street canyons. Solar Energy. 81:742-54.

3. Biotope Area Factor (BAF), 1994, Berlin, Germany.

http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/umwelt/landschaftsplanung/bff/index_en.shtml

4. Bruse, M. (2003) http://envi-met.com/

5. Bruse, M. (2008). Envi-Met V3.1, a Microscale Urban Climate Model, [Online], Available:

www.Envi-Met.Com. Accessed 11/6/2010. (Bruse 2013)

6. California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, California.

http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/docs/ab32text.pdf

7. Chen, Yu and Wong, N. H. (2005). The intervention of plants in the conflict between building

and climate in the tropical climate, Sustainable Building 2005, Tokyo, Japan.

8. EcoDensity Initiative, 2006, Vancouver, Canada. http://www.vancouver-ecodensity.ca/

9. Givoni, B. (1991). Impact of planted areas on urban environmental quality: A review.

Atmospheric Environment, 25B(3), 289-299.

10. Greenspace Factor, 2001, Malmö, Sweden. http://www.map21ltd.com/scan-green/bo01.htm

11. Green Factor, 2007, Seattle, US. http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Permits/GreenFactor/

12. Kawashima S. (1990/91). Effect of Vegetation on Surface Temperature in Urban and Suburban

Areas in Winter. Energy and Buildings, 15 – 16, 465 –469.

13. Kazmierczak, A. and Carter, J. (2010) Adaptation to climate change using green and blue

infrastructure. A database of case studies.

14. Portland’s Green Building Policy.

http://www.portlandonline.com/osd/index.cfm?a=bbcgif&c=ebhab

15. Saito, I. (1990). Study of the effect of green areas on the thermal environment in an urban area.

Energy and Buildings, 15-16, 443-446.

16. Tan P. Y., and Angelia, S. (2010) Leaf Area Index of Tropical Plants: A Guidebook on its Use

in the Calculation of Green Plot Ratio, National Parks Board.

30th INTERNATIONAL PLEA CONFERENCE 16-18 December 2014, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

9


Recommended