Date post: | 29-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | phyllis-watkins |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Greenhouse Gas Offsets:Their Importance and Role in a
Load-Based Cap System
Presentation to California PUC Symposium
on Flexible Compliance Mechanisms
in a Market-Based GHG Cap SystemApril 20, 2007
Mike BurnettExecutive Director
503-238-1915
2
Today’s Topics
Overview of the Oregon CO2 Standard and The Climate Trust
Greenhouse Gas Offsets: How They Work and Why They are Important
Offsets in Oregon’s Carbon Allocation Task Force Design for a Load-Based Cap and Trade System
Transition to the Future: Project to Protocol
4
Overview of Oregon CO2 PolicyFirst Legislative CO2 Regulation in the US
Regulates CO2
New power plants must offset a significant portion (~17%) of their CO2 emissions
Unique Non-Profit RoleDeveloper can comply by paying a per-ton fee to The Climate Trust, which acquires CO2 offsets
5
Who is The Climate Trust?Offset Market Pioneer and Quality Leader
Non-profit based in Portland, Oregon
One of largest offset buyers in USOnly state-recognized supplier of regulatory-grade offsets
Experienced offset practitioner: Since 1999Portfolio: 18 projects, $9 million, 3 million tons CO2
PipelineOregon Program: Placing $2.6 million into new projects this yearLarge Emitters: 10+ million ton acquisition, largest in US to date
Quality reputation with regulators, business, and environmental groups
6
Oregon Power Plant Offset Program
Greenhouse Gas Offset Partnership ProgramLarge Emitter Customized OffsetsDonate-to-OffsetCarbonCounter.orgEmployee Offset Program
Offset Policy InitiativeAdvice to Oregon, Washington, RGGI, California …Assisting in voluntary market standards development
The Climate Trust: 3 Main ProgramsProviding Offsets and Advice
7
Cornerstones of Our Offset PortfolioQuality Offsets are Trust’s Highest Priority
Diverse portfolio
High eligibility standards
Rigorous process and review
Strong carbon contracts
Competitive price compared to offset market
Quality Projects: Selection CriteriaRigorous Internal and External Review Process
Primary selection factorsAdditionality
Cost effectiveness: $/metric ton of GHG benefit
Reliability of technology
Reliability of project partner
Other project selection factors include:Monitoring & verification - Replicability
Permanence - Expandability
Guarantees - Portfolio diversity
Location of project - Co-benefits
9
Solicitation StructureTwo-Phase Process
Phase 1: Short form proposalsProvides project summary informationLimited to 10 pagesBudget spreadsheet
CO2 benefit spreadsheet
Phase 2: Detailed proposalsSelected bidders will be invited to submit detailed proposals and respond to project specific questions from staff
Phase 3: Negotiation and ContractingClimate Trust enters into negotiation with selected bidders
10
WindWind
Streamside Streamside ReforestatioReforestatio
nn
CogenerationCogeneration
Diverse, High Quality Offset PortfolioA Sampling of Our 18 Projects
Blended CementBlended Cement
Truck Stop Truck Stop Idle Idle
ReductionReduction
Rainforest Rainforest ReforestatioReforestatio
nn
Industrial EfficiencyIndustrial Efficiency
Energy Efficiency
Traffic Signal Traffic Signal OptimizationOptimization
12
Policy Rationale for OffsetsImportant Tool for Countering Climate Change
Quality reductions: IF DONE RIGHT, equally effective in reducing atmospheric GHG levels as on-site mitigationLower cost: Offsets are only used if lower cost
Lowers climate change mitigation cost to societyMore money for everything else:
Food, shelter, health, security, recreation
Technology bridge: Allows reductions now while new low-carbon technology is developedCo-Benefits: Environmental and economic
13
Where Do Offsets Fit? In the Mitigation “Pecking Order”
Offsets are an important but minority part of the climate solution
Balanced 4-step process:Cut wasteInvest in efficiencyBuy renewables for your electricityOffset the rest
Applies equally to companies and policy (and individuals)
14
What is an Offset?Concept Originated in Accounting in 1769
Dictionaries tell us that a GHG offset…
1. Cancels out emissions
2. That are recorded in a GHG ledger
(or the atmosphere)
3. With an end effect as if the cancelled emissions had not occurred
A “compensating equivalent”
15
What is a Greenhouse Gas Offset?A High Quality Environmental Commodity
A greenhouse gas offset is a specific project implemented to displace, avoid, or sequester greenhouse gases
The reduction is “abstracted” from the underlying project and sold by the offset project owner
The offset is used as a “compensating equivalent” for GHG emission reductions occurring at another source with an end effect as if the cancelled emissions had not occurred
16
To
tal
GH
G E
mis
sio
ns
Facility Offset Project
Onsite Reduction
BE
FO
RE
AF
TE
R
BE
FO
RE
AF
TE
R
Offsite Reduction
Baseline
Reduction Target
The Basic Promise That an Offset MakesA “Compensating Equivalent” to Facility Reductions
$
$
The Basic Promise:
An emitter must invest in its own facility to implement facility reductions. As an alternative, when investing offsite (in offsets) for reductions, the project must similarly be dependent on offset funding.
17
CO2 emissions
years
Baseline emissions
Project emissions
Project begins Project ends
Offsets
The baseline case
The project case
What is an Offset? (theory)Specific Project That Reduces GHG Levels
18
Truck Stop Electrification
“Shut down and plug in”
Shifts from diesel idling to lower carbon grid electricity
I-5 Corridor in OR and WA
90,000 metric tons CO2
Saving estimated 10 million gallons of diesel fuel
Emissions co-benefits:1,400 tons of nitrogen oxides (NOx)
40 tons of particulate matter (PM)
16 year contract
What is an Offset? (practice)Specific Project That Reduces GHG Levels
19
Quality Offsets: AdditionalityOffsets are a High Quality Environmental Commodity
The “IF DONE RIGHT” caveat
“Additional”: Mitigation measures that would not occur without offset project funding
Excludes common practice, regulated activitiesOvercome barriers: Capital unavailable, investment hurdle rate, no economic return, high perceived risksMoney making projects eligible, if other barriers
Project must go beyond business-as-usual baseline (not base year)
“Environmentally additional” is a subset of “environmentally beneficial”
All GHG benefits are not suitable for offsets
20Facility
Offset Project
Legend
To
tal
GH
G E
mis
sio
ns
Before Reductions
After Internal Compliance
After Offset Compliance
Reductions Target
Facility Baseline
Non-Additional Offset
“Compliance”
Pre Compliance GHG Level
Post Compliance GHG Level
Why Additionality MattersEnsures Real Reductions (= “If Done Right”)
21
Quality Offsets: Quantification Experts Prepare Baseline Studies and M&V Plan
Baseline studyBuild in expected changes from business as usual
Monitoring & Verification PlanMeasurement technique
Periodic measurement
3rd party verification
Results used in contracts to verify deliveryEnter in offset registry
Quality Offsets: OwnershipEstablishing Legal Basis for a New Commodity
Extensive legal definitions regarding offsetsDeveloper transfers any and all rights to CO2 reductions
Bill of SaleAnnual Offset CertificateThird party verification of the quantity of offsets delivered
Programmatic offsets: Participation agreements create a clear ownership trail to tons of CO2
Contracts: No Double CountingCritical to Environmental Integrity
Seller exclusions:Seller can’t sell the same tons to another entity
Seller can’t use the tons for other purposes
No sale of CO2 in environmental products
E.g., Green Tags
Disclosures and disclaimers:Written disclaimers from all partners & participants
Disclose sale to regulatory authorities & others
Define what “bragging rights” are OK
24
Environmental Integrity: ParamountEqually Important for Regulatory & Voluntary Markets
Purpose of offsets is not …Market transformation
Building a trading market
But rather tightly accounted tons reductionsEnvironmentally additional is a subset of environmentally beneficial
All GHG benefits are not suitable for offsets
Voluntary market integrity is crucial to the inclusion of offsets in policy mechanisms
26
Offsets: CATF Design15-Month Stakeholder Consensus Process
Full conceptual design of a load-based cap and trade system
Presented to Governor in January 2007
One of several climate bills that Legislature may consider this session
RPS, biofuels highest priority
Then omnibus climate bill, EPS, and finally cap and trade
May roll over into 2008 extended session
27
Offsets: Important Minority RoleDrive Technology Change in Uncapped Sectors
State has been an offset leaderCO2 Standard: Positive experience
Continuing to lead on offset quality is important
Developing in-state offset capacity importantTechnology suppliers and intellectual capital
Adds “3rd leg” to LSE purchase optionsPurchase allowances from surplus LSE
Purchase at auction
Purchase offsets
Why minority role? Primarily want to drive LSE investments in low-carbon technology
28
Offsets: Design ParametersBalancing Many Stakeholder Viewpoints
Minority component
25% of reductions from base year (not reductions from growing business as usual
Need for offsets should decline over time
LSEs need more flexibility early
Need functioning offset capability at beginning of cap system
Develop state and supplier capacity
Offset suppliers need certainty:
Project eligibility & accounting; Saleable
29
Important Minority Role OffsetsLimited to 25% of Reductions from Base Year
Oregon GHG Emissions Under CATF ProposalShowing Role of Offsets and Unbundled RECs in Emissions Reductions
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Mil
lio
n T
on
s o
f C
O2
BAU
Unbundled RECs
Offsets
Cap
30
Offsets: DefinitionsEvolution from Oregon CO2 Standard
In addition to surrendering state-issued allowances, an LSE could surrender a limited number of GHG offsets
Offsets are credits for reductions from outside the electrical sector or other regulated sectors.
Offsets allowed from 6 GHGs:CO2, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
Based on CO2–equivalent global warming potential
31
Offsets: ProcessFrom Legislation to Rulemaking to Implementation
Legislation: Subsequent rulemaking to assure that all GHG offsets are real, quantifiable, verified, additional, permanent, and enforceable
ODOE rulemaking to determine eligibility Additionality, type, source, vintage, permanence
ODOE would establish protocols to quantify, verify and retire those offsets
Administrative fee to cover state’s costs of offset program
33
Project-to-ProtocolImportant Transition Phase in Offset Market
Historical offset market has been project-based
Shifting to standardized protocols
Currently, demand for offsets (and supply of desirable offset types) exceeds the “supply” of standardized protocols
Project-to-Protocol approach implements individual projects using rigorous criteria, and uses them as a basis for standardized protocols
Helps develop supply of quality of reductions while developing replicable protocols