Date post: | 25-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | nguyenhanh |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
Production sharing agreementsSurrendering Iraq’s resource sovereignty?
Greg Muttitt, PLATFORM
Presentation to al-Kindi Society, 22 July 2006
Oil in Iraq
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
115 billion barrels of known reserves – 10% of world total.
70% of GDP; 95% of government revenue.
71 discovered oilfields, of which only 24 have been developed.
Oil law, 2006
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• Now being written, to be voted on by Parliament by end 2006.
• To allow contracts to be signed with “the largest companies”
- most likely production sharing agreements.
• 4 (small) PSAs have already been signed by KRG.
Oil law – external influence
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• Timescale set by IMF
• US Embassy officials and contractors major input into drafting
• Draft reviewed by US Energy Secretary last week on visit to Baghdad
• IMF to review draft in September.
What is a PSA?
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• A contract between a multinational oil company and a host government, in which the corporation provides capital investment, in exchange for operational control over an oilfield, and access to a share of the revenues from it.
• Lasting usually 25-40 years - and sometimes indefinite.
• Precise terms depend on negotiation between state and company.
• A change of language, describing the state as "owner" and the foreign company as "contractor", but in practice mostly equivalent to concession agreements.
PSA - language
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
“A convenient marriage between the politically useful symbolism of the production-sharing contract (appearance of a service contract to the state company acting as master) and the material equivalence of this contract model with concession/licence regimes in all significant aspects … It gives to the government political and to the company commercial satisfaction. The government can be seen to be running the show - and the company can run it behind the camouflage of legal title symbolising the assertion of national sovereignty.”
- Professor Thomas Wälde, University of Dundee
Consequences of PSAs for sovereignty
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
1. Fixed economic terms
2. Loss of control of depletion rate
3. Undermine ability to legislate
4. Status of other laws
Fixed economic terms
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• Product of negotiation
• Reflect bargaining power at time of signing
- Security situation and political risk
- Weakness of institutions
- Occupation
Lessons from former Soviet Union
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
“"We have drawn a conclusion that PSA terms for Sakhalin-2 are decidedly not beneficial for Russia."
-Mikhail Beskhmelnitsyn, auditor, Accounting Chamber of Russian Federation, January 2005
“I have these discussions with Kazakhs, with Azeris, ‘oh, well maybe you know we gave too much away, maybe we didn’t get enough government take, maybe the foreign investors aren’t paying fair share’… But if you turned the clock back to 1994 in Kazakhstan, and think about the significant political risk, not to mention the technical and economic risk…”
- Dan Witt, International Tax & Investment Center
Lessons from Iraq’s history
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• 1925 concession contract signed when government was new and weak, and Iraq was occupied by Britain.
• Terms of contract reflected the weakness of the Iraqi state, but lasted for much longer.
• Unfairness of terms became clear over subsequent decades, but could not be changed.
Loss of control of depletion rate
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• One of the most important economic decisions in an oil-dependent country.
• In a PSA, either left for foreign company to decide or specified in contract.
Impact on OPEC
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• cf Algeria, Nigeria – OPEC members with major foreign company involvement.
Iraq cuts back on any oil production in public sector
Iraq weakens OPEC by overproducing
Iraq leaves OPEC
Undermine ability to legislate
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
Stabilisation clause:
Guarantees the investor’s profits against any change in future legislation.
New laws do not apply to PSA area
Foreign company compensated for loss of profits
INOC carries cost of change
Stabilisation clauses
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• Loss of sovereignty
• Disincentive against regulation.
“A chilling effect on human rights”- Amnesty International
Over-riding existing legislation
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• Contracts internationalised, through reference to bilateral investment treaty.
• Acquire status of a treaty – over-ride all other laws (except constitution) in case of conflict.
Over-riding existing legislation
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline:
“BP representatives are requesting the Georgian Government to violate our own environmental legislation”.- Nino Chkhobadze, Georgia Environment Minister, November 2002
Minister could not change routing, because pipeline agreements made all other laws irrelevant.
Political costs of PSAs
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• Impact on security situation.
• Impact on corruption.
• Impact on democracy.
Advantages of PSAs
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
1) Foreign company provides capital investment
2) Foreign company provides technical expertise
3) Foreign company takes risks
Useful where development costs high.
Useful where fields are marginal or complex.
Useful where high-risk exploration is required, or where profits are marginal.
What is done elsewhere?
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
Source: International Energy Agency
%age of world reserves by industry structure:
Iraq investment needs
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• Technical expertise through technical service agreements.
• Investment required to develop major oilfields: up to $4 billion per year. 3 options:
1) Finance from government budgets
2) Borrow from international debt markets
3) Use foreign companies.
Range of contract options with less sovereignty implications than PSAs: eg buybacks, risk service contracts.
Conclusions
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
• Iraq’s oil sector needs investment – but should be cautious about what form it takes, and on whose terms.
• It is for the Iraqi people to decide how the oil sector should be structured.
• Before making such decisions, a thorough public debate and consultation is essential.
• It would be a mistake to negotiate long-term commitments at a time of weakness.
Recommendations
PLATFORMwww.carbonweb.org
Long-term contracts should not be considered until Iraqi oil industry capacity has been rebuilt and Iraq is fully sovereign (ie foreign troops have left)
In the meantime, the priorities should be:
a) security,
b) fighting corruption, and
c) rehabilitation and development of known oilfields, using Iraq’s own resources.