GROUNDWATER EFFECTIVENESS MONITORING REPORT › work › 04 › 10838826.pdfGroundwater Sampling...

GROUNDWATER EFFECTIVENESS MONITORING REPORT

EPA Identification No. FLD980602882

TriAD Project No. 96-SAP05-01

Prepared for:

SAPP BATTERY NPL SITE

Prepared by:

TriAD Environmental Consultants, Inc. 207 Donelson Pike, Suite 200

Nashville, TN 37214 Phone: 615-889-6888 Fax: 615-889-4004

August 26, 2009

Table of Contents

Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS 1

3.0 MONITORING RESULTS 3 3.1 Groundwater Flow Reginne 3 3.2 Analytical Results 3 3.3 Statistical Evaluation 4 3.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Evaluation 4

4.0 CONCLUSIONS .....5

Figure

Potentiometric Map Figure 1

Tables

Summary of Potentiometric Surface Elevations Table 1 Groundwater Analytical Results Summary Table 2

Appendices

Well Construction Diagrams.... Appendix A Groundwater Sampling Data Sheets Appendix B Groundwater Laboratory Report Appendix C EW-1 Control Chart Appendix D

1.0 INTRODUCTION

TriAD Environmental Consultants, Inc., (TriAD) on behalf of the Sapp Battery Site Group,

presents the following report describing the July 2009 groundwater effectiveness

monitoring episode at the Sapp Battery Site in Alford, Florida (Site). The groundwater

monitoring system provides the means to conduct effectiveness monitoring of the OU-1

solidification/stabilization remedy as outlined in the Operations and Maintenance Plan,

Sapp Battery Site, dated September 21, 2001. Appendix 1 of the Operations and

Maintenance Plan isthe Groundwater Monitoring Plan, Sapp Battery NPL Site, September

21,2001 (GWMP). The GWMP outlines a methodology to design, construct, and sample a

groundwater monitoring network in the surficial aquifer since any impact to groundwater by

the solidified/stabilized soil would first be detected in the surficial aquifer.

The GWMP was implemented in 2003, with four monitoring wells installed at the Site, EW-

1, EW-2, EW-3, and EW-4. Construction diagrams of each well are presented in Appendix

A. The first groundwater sampling event occurred August 27, 2003. Thereafter, quarteriy

monitoring events were conducted on December 4, 2003, March 4, 2004, and May 27,

2004. Semi-annual groundwater monitoring events occurred on October 20, 2004, June

16, 2005, November 2005, May 2006, December 2006, June 2007, December 2007, and

August 2008. This report presents the results of the groundwater effectiveness monitoring

episode conducted in July 2009. The May 2006 effectiveness monitoring event marked the

completion of the five-year effectiveness monitoring program designed to evaluate the

effectiveness of the OU-1 solidification/stabilization remedy. Subsequent sampling

episodes have been completed voluntarily by the Sapp Battery Group.

2.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

On July 15 and 16, 2009, water levels were obtained and groundwater samples were

collected from each of the four monitoring wells. The groundwater samples were then

submitted for analytical testing. The following paragraphs discuss the procedures generally

used during the field activities and the analytical testing program completed at the Site.

Groundwater Sampling Data Sheets are presented in Appendix B.

Sapp Battery NPL Site Semi-Annual Groundwater Effectiveness Monitoring Report TriAD Project No. 96-SAP05-01 August 26, 2009

1

Priorto well purging, depth-to-water was recorded to the nearest hundredth of a foot from

the top of the PVC casing. The water level measurements were utilized for determining

water volumes in the well casing, calculating potentiometric surface elevation (feet above

msl), and in preparation of a potentiometric map to determine groundwater flow direction

and gradient at the Site.

Dedicated QED Well Wizard bladder pumps were used to purge a minimum of three

volumes from wells EW-2, EW-3, EW-4, and a peristaltic pump with dedicated tubing was

used to purge EW-1. Wells EW-2, EW-3, and EW-4 were purged until three consecutive,

stable readings of pH, temperature, conductivity, and turbidity were obtained. Well EW-1

was incapable of producing three well volumes without going dry; therefore, less than three

well volumes were purged prior to sampling this well. In all wells, the dedicated pumps are

set so that the sample collection point is at the approximate mid-point of the well screen.

Measurements of pH, temperature, specific conductance, and turbidity were collected and

recorded at intervals while purging and immediately prior to sample collection.

Following purging, samples were collected directly from the pump discharge. With the

exception of EW-1, samples were collected using dedicated QED sampling pumps.

Samples to be analyzed for dissolved metal analysis were field filtered using an in-line,

dedicated, disposable, high capacity filter cartridge with a minimum 0.1 micron pore size.

At EW-1, due to problems of low yield and high turbidity, groundwater samples were

collected using a peristaltic pump with dedicated tygon tubing, with the dissolved metal

samples filtered in the field. Purge water removed from each of the wells was contained in

closed, labeled 55-gallon drums and staged on Site pending review of the groundwater

analytical results.

All samples were collected into laboratory-supplied containers and ice chests and

transported under signed chain-of-custody documentation to TestAmerica Laboratories in

Pensacola, Florida. The parameters analyzed during this event include both total and

dissolved metal analyses for lead, cadmium, arsenic, and antimony using U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency. (EPA), SW-846, Method 601 OB.

Sapp Battery NPL Site Semi-Annual Groundwater Effectiveness Monitoring Report TriAD Project No. 96-SAP05-01 August 26,2009

2

3.0 IVIONITORING RESULTS

Groundwater conditions at the Site were evaluated based on physical and analytical data

obtained as part of the July 2009 effectiveness monitoring event. The following sections

present the groundwater conditions at the facility during this sampling period. Summary

tables of potentiometric measurements and analytical results are presented as Table 1 and

2, and the laboratory data reports are included as Appendix C.

3.1 Groundwater Flow Regime

Top-of-casing elevations and water level measurements from the July 15, 2009 sampling

were used to prepare the potentiometric surface map presented as Figure 1. Only wells

EW-1, EW-3, and EW-4 were utilized to determine site flow direction because drilling and

water level information indicate that EW-2 is screened within the deeper, Floridian aquifer.

The calculated groundwater gradient of the current event based on wells EW-1, EW-3, and

EW-4 is approximately 0.01 to the south-southeast.

Comparison of the current potentiometric measurements to historic monitoring events

demonstrates that the water surface has rebounded from the drought experienced in the

area during late 2006 and all of 2007. Trends of the potentiometric surface throughout the

monitoring history are presented in Table 1.

The above description of the groundwaterflow regime is based on data obtained from the

four monitoring wells installed and monitored by the Sapp Battery Site Group, and does not

include data from all monitoring wells at the Site. The EPA has installed additional

monitoring wells, including wells in the stabilized areas, data from which may provide

additional information and characterization of the flow regime.

3.2 Analytical Results

Analytical results indicate that sampies from monitoring wells EW-1, EW-2, EW-3, and EW-

4 did not contain lead, cadmium, arsenic, or antimony at concentrations at or above the

Sapp Battery NPL Site Semi-Annual Groundwater Effectiveness Monitoring Report TriAD Project No. 96'SAP05-01 August 26, 2009

3

laboratory Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) or Federal Drinking Water Maximum

Contaminant Level (MCLs). Several constituents were detected above the laboratory

Method Detection Limit (MDL) but below the laboratory PQL, the level at which the

laboratory can both detect and accurately quantify the presence and concentration of a

constituent. The following constituents were detected during the July 2009 groundwater

monitoring event.

Total lead was detected in EW-1 at a concentration of 0.0042 mg/L, but was not detected

above the MDL of 0.0040 mg/L in the duplicate sample EW-1 D. Lead was also detected

slightly above the MDL in EW-3 at a concentration of 0.0053 mg/l.

Total Antimony was detected in EW-3 at a concentration of 0.000062 mg/L, while dissolved

Antimony was detected in EW-3, EW-4 and EW-1 D at concentrations of 0.000053 mg/L,

0.00022 mg/L, and 0.000065 mg/L respectively

3.3 Statistical Evaluation

The GWMP requires that a statistical trend analysis be used to conduct intra-well

comparisons of the groundwater data. Since the constituents of concern (COCs) have only

been detected at or above the PQLs at EW-1, a trend analysis for total lead is provided for

this well. The lead detected in the samples from well EW-1 in December 2003 and March

2004 is significantly less than that detected in the first event conducted in August 2003. A

slightly elevated level was again detected in October 2004; however, since 2004, total lead

at EW-1 has steadily declined with detected concentrations at or only slightly above the

laboratory MDL.

3.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Evaluation

Quality Assurance/Quality Control (Q/VQC) was ensured by following the procedures set

forth in the GWMP. All field equipment was either dedicated to individual wells or

decontaminated in accordance with the procedures in Section 6.3 of the GWMP. Sampie

collection, handling, and shipping followed the procedures in Sections6.1,6.3,6.4, and6.5

of the GWMP. Field parameters were measured using instruments calibrated in


4

accordance with manufacturer's specifications. With the exception of a deviation in

sampling protocol described in Section 2.0 at well EW-1, no deviations from the GWMP

were noted during the semi-annual groundwater sampling event.

All sampie analyses were pertormed at a Florida Department of Environmental Protection

certified laboratory. A duplicate groundwater sample was collected at well location EW-1

and labeled as EW-1 D. One field blank was also collected. The total lead result from the

duplicate sample EW-1 D was not detected at a concentration at or above laboratory MDL

while the total lead concentration for sample EW-1 was slightly above the laboratory MDL

but below the PQL. These concentrations are comparable and within control limits for the

respective well samples for all analyses. No constituents were detected above their

laboratory MDL in the Field Blank.

4.0 CONCLUSIONS

Based on the data collected during the sampling and analysis activities, the following

conclusions can be made:

•

•

The sample from well EW-1 had a total lead concentration of 0.0042 mg/L, slightly

higher than the laboratory MDL but below the PQL. A duplicate sample EW-1 D did

not detect lead at a concentration at or above the laboratory MDL of 0.0040 mg/L.

These concentrations are less than the federal lead action level of 0.015 mg/L.

The sample from well EW-3 had a total lead concentration of 0.0053 mg/L. This

concentration is slightly higher than the laboratory PQL and is less than the federal

lead action level of 0.015 mg/L. None of the other sampled contained total or

dissolved lead at concentrations equal to or greater than the laboratory MDL.

While antimony was not detected at any location above the laboratory PQL, total

antimony was detected in EW-3 above the MDL at a concentration of 0.000062

mg/L. Dissolved Antimony was detected above the MDL in EW-3, EW-4 and EW-


5

•

ID at concentrations of 0.000053 ing/L, 0.00022 mg/L, and 0.000065 mg/L

respectively. None of the samples contained total or dissolved antimony at

concentrations equal to or greater than the MGL for antimony of 0.006 mg/L.

Neither arsenic nor cadmium was detected at concentrations equal to or greater

than their respective laboratory MDL.

The monitoring results demonstrate that the solidification/stabilization remedy is

successful and that the solidified/stabilized monolith is not having an adverse impact

on groundwater.


6

FIGURE

U.S. EPA REGION IV

SDMS Unscannable Material Target Sheet

DocID:/g 7 3 W 3 3 Site \T^:J^^7^9^a^0l^y^

Site N a m e ^ . . 4 k ^ ? > ^ 2 ^ ; X . , / L y ! A ^ ^ ^ .

Nature of Material;

Map:

Photos:

Blueprints:

Slides:

^

jn Computer Disks:

CD-ROM:

Oversized Report;

Log Book:

(describe): Ac^j^r^zA^-y^^^^TZz^y >.^^^ ^^^^^nv^ Other

Amount of material:

Please contact the appropriate Records Center to view the material

TABLES

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE ELEVATIONS

GROUNDWATER EFFECTIVENESS MONITORING SAPP BATTERY NPL SITE EPA ID NO. FLD980602882

WELL NO: EW-I T.O.C. ELEVATION: 142.29

WELL DEPTH FROM T.O.C. (Feet): 40.65 Date

Measured 08/27/03 12/04/03 03/04/04 05/27/04 10/20/04 06/16/05 10/27/05 05/17/06 12/07/06 06/07/07 12/05/07 08/07/08 07/16/09

Potentiometric Measurement

8.82 10.63 7.87 9.97 8.02 7.81

11.79 9.18 15.43 16.09 17.10 14.29 9.74

Potentiometric Elevation

133.47 131.66 134.42 132.32 134.27 135.07 130.50 133.11 126.86 126.20 125.19 128.00 132.55

,o n > lij

o +.< a E o c Ci

O a.

136.00

••= 124.00

B 122.00 120.00

Potentiometric Elevation Trend

09/01/02 01/14/04 05/28/05 10/10/06 02/22/08 07/06/09 11/18/10

I Date Measured

MH

TABLE 1 (continued) SUMMARY OF POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE ELEVATIONS

GROUNDWATER EFFECTIVENESS MONITORING SAPP BATTERY NPL SITE EPA ID NO. FLD980602882

WELL NO: EW-2 T.O.C. ELEVATION: 138.97

WELL DEPTH FROM T.O.C.(Feet): 60.51 Date

Measured 08/27/03 12/04/03 03/04/04 05/27/04 10/20/04 06/16/05 10/27/05 05/17/06 12/07/06 06/07/07 12/05/07 8/7/2008 07/16/09


35.07 39.55 37.52 39.86 37.84 34.53 37.59 40.20 46.39 46.39 49.87 45.13 38.97


103.90 99.42 101.45 99.11 101.13 104.44 101.38 98.77 92.58 92.58 89.10 93.83 100.00

110.00 c I 105.00 >

" 100.00

95.00

90.00

UJ

u 0) E _o 'S I 85.00 o

80.00


9/1/02 1/14/04 5/28/05 10/10/06 2/22/08 7/6/09 11/18/10

Date Measured

MM

V TABLE 1 (continued)

SUMMARY OF POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE ELEVATIONS GROUNDWATER EFFECTIVENESS MONITORING

SAPP BATTERY NPL SITE EPA ID NO. FLD980602882



Measured 08/27/03 12/04/03 03/04/04 05/27/04 10/20/04 06/16/05 10/27/05 05/17/06 12/07/06 06/07/07 12/05/07 8/6/2008

7/15/2009


10.47 13.05 11.96 13.43 11.93 9.63 12.77 12.00 17.21 17.77 22.58 13.77 30.62


123.29 120.71 121.80 120.33 121.83 124.13 120.99 121.76 116.55 115.99 111.18 119.99 121.32

c 124.00 o % 122.00 > ~ 120.00 •c 118.00

I 116.00 O

1 114.00 • J o Q.

112.00

110.00

PoteflHfdtfktric Elevation Trend

9/1/02 1/14/04 5/28/05 10/10/06 2/22/08 7/6/09 11/18/10

Date Measured

H I

ĉ TABLE 1 (continued) SUMMARY OF POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE ELEVATIONS GROUNDWATER EFFECTIVENESS MONITORING

SAPP BATTERY NPL SITE EPA ID NO. FLD980602882

C



Measured

08/27/03 12/04/03 03/04/04 05/27/04 10/20/04 06/16/05 10/27/05 05/17/06 12/07/06 06/07/07 12/05/07 8/6/2008

7/15/2009


12.40 13.85 12.75 11.41 13.21 11.62 13.45 13.33 17.32 19.03 22.48 19.82 14.42


123.70 122.25 123.35 124.69 122.89 124.48 122.65 122.77 118.78 117.07 113.62 116.28 121.68

.1 126.00 I 124.00 ^ 122.00 u u 120.00 i: 118.00 E o

116.00 .2 114.00 c o o a

112.00 110.00


9/1/02 1/14/04 5/28/05 10/10/06 2/22/08 7/6/09 11/18/10

Date Measured

TABLE 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY

GROUNDWATER EFFECTIVENESS MONITORING SAPP BATTERY NPL SITE EPA ID No. FLD980602882

Parameter

Antimony

Arsenic

Cadmium

Lead

Antimony, Dissolvect

Arsenic, Dissolved

Cadmium, Dissolved

Lead, Dissolved

Pertormance

Standard ^

0.006

0,01

0.005

0.015

0.006

0,01

0.005

0.015

EW-1 1 8/27/03

r̂

TABLE 2 CONTINUED GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY


Parameter

Antimony

Arsenic

Cadmium

Lead

Antimony, Dissolved

Arsenic, Dissolved Cadmium, Dissolved

Lead. Dissolved

Pertormance

Standard ^

0.006

0.01

0,005

0,015

0.008

0.01

0.005

0.015

EW-2 8/27/03

EPA ID No. FLD980602882 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY


Parameter

Antimony

Arsenic

Cadmium

Lead

Antimony, Dissolved Arsenic,

Dissolved Cadmium, Dissolved

Lead, Dissolved

Performance

S tandard '

0.006

0.01

0.005

0.015

0.006

0.01

0.005

0.015

EW-3 1 8/27/03



Parameter

Antimony

Arsenic

Cadmium

Lead

Antimony. Dissolved Arsenic,


Lead, Dissolved

Performance

Standard ^

0.006

0.01

0.005

0,015

0.006

0.01

0,005

0,015

EW-4 1 8/27/03



Parameter Antimony Arsenic

Cadmium Lead

Antimony. Dissoived Arsenic,


Lead, Dissolved

Performance

Standard' 0,006 0,01 0.005 0.015

0.006

0,01

0,005

0,015

FIELD BLANK j 8/27/03

APPENDIX A

WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAMS

GROUND SURFACE

SECURITY CASING WITH LOCKABLE CAP

TOP OF CASING

TOP OF 3ft X 3ft CONCRETE PAD

BENTONITE GROUT

TOP OF SAND PACK

TOP OF SCREEN

DEPTH (BTOC)

+1.06'

0.00

2 ' DIA. PVC RISER

TOP OF BENTONITE PELLET SEAL ^^.tO

27.10'

29.U'

#14 SIUCA SAND PACK

2" DIA.. 0.010" SLOTTED PVC SCREEN

BOTTOM OF SCREEN

BOTTOM OF WELL

39.14'

39.59'

FLEVA-nON (oal)

142.29'

141.23'

116.0'

114.09'

112.09'

102.09'

101.64'

NOT TO SCALE

PREPARED BY:

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Suite 200, 207 Donelson Pike, NQs^vIie. Tn 372U 615-889-6888 fox 615-839-4004

MONITORING WELL EW-1 MAY 2003


DWG. OATt:: 0 6 / 2 6 / 0 3

FILE NAME: 0101-EW-1.DWG

PROJECT NO.: 9 6 - S A P O l - O l

SHEET 1 OF 1


GROUND SURFACE

•TOP OF CASING

JL TOP OF 3 f t X 3 f t CONCRETE PAD

NOT TO SCALE

BENTONITE GROUT

2 ' DIA PVC RISER

TOP OF SAND PACK

• TOP OF SCREEN

#14 SIUCA SAND PACK

DEPTH (BTOC)

+1.70 '

0.00

TOP OF BENTONITE PEUET SEAL ^ * - ^ ^ '

46.36'

4fl.36'

2" DIA.. 0.010" SLOTTED PVC SCREEN

•BOTTOM OF SCREEN

•BOTTOM OF WELL

58.36'

58.81*

ELEVATION

(osl)

138.97'

137.27"

92.91'

90.91'

88.91'

78.91'

78.46'

PREPARED BY:

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Suite 200. 207 Donelson Pike, tJoshvile. Tn 372U 615-889-6888 fo. 6)5-889-4004

MONITORING WELL EW-2 MAY 2003


DWG, DATE: 06/26/03 FILE NAME: 0101-EW-2,DWG

PROJECT NO.: 96-SAPOl-Ol SHEET 1 OF 1

GROUND SURFACE


•TOP OF CASING

DEPTH (BTOC)

+1.18'

l_ TOP OF 3ft X 3ft CONCRETE PAD

NOT TO SCALE

0.00

•BENTONITE GROUT

•2" DIA. PVC RISER

TOP OF BENTONITE PELLET SEAL 1 ± ^

TOP OF SAND PACK

•TOP OF SCREEN

16.99'

18.99'

#14 SILICA SAND PACK

2" DIA, 0.010" SLOTTED PVC SCREEN

•BOTTOM OF SCREEN

•BOTTOM OF WELL

28.99'

29.4-4'

ELEVATION (ost)

133.76'

132.58'

117.69'

115.89'

113.89'

103.89'

103.14'

PREPARED BY:

•Tr iAD ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Suite 200. 207 Donelson Pike, Noshvile, Tn 37214 615-889-6888 (ax 615-889-4004 MONITORING WELL EW-3

MAY 2003 SAPP BATTERY NPL SITE

DWG. DATE: 06/26/03

FILE NAME: 0101-EW-3.DWG

PROJECT NO.: 96-SAPOl-Ol SHEET 1 OF 1


GROUND SURFACE

•TOP OF CASING

JL TOP OF 3 f t X 3ft CONCRETE PAD

H O I TO SCALE

BENTONITE GROUT

• 2 ' DIA. PVC RISER

TOP OF SAND PACK

TOP OF SCREEN

#14 SIUCA SAND PACK

DEPTH (BTOC)

+2 .25 '

0.00

TOP OF BENTONITE PELLET SEAL ^7-2^ '

19.24'

21.24'

2" DIA., 0.010" SLOTTED PVC SCREEN

•BOTTOM OF SCREEN ^ ^ - 2 ^ '

•BOTTOM OF WELL 31.69'

ELEVATION (od )

136.10'

133.85'

116.61'

114.61"

112.61"

102.61'

102.16'

PREPARED BY:

ATriAD ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Suitt 200. 207 Dondson Pike. Koshvlle, To 37214 615-889-6888 (OK 615-889-4004 MONITORING WELL EW-4

MAY 2003 SAPP BATTERY NPL SITE

DWG. DATE: 06/26/03 FILE NAME: 0101-£W-4,DWG

PROJECT NO.: 96-SAPOl-Ol SHEET \ OF 1

APPENDIX B

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATASHEETS

k Ml

Site Name

Well No.

TrlAD Environmental Consultants Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet

Sapp Batterv

EW-1

Project No.

Date

Field Personnel Weather Conditions Well Depth Static Water Level Length of Water Column TOC Elevation

Rutherford. Smiley. Hobbs Sunnv. 95 °F

40.65 ft (w.r.t. TOC) 9.74 ft (w.r.t TOC) 30.91 ft 142.29 ft

96-SAP05-01

07/15/09

Well Diameter in

5.0 gal

2:30 am/pm Well Tvoe: P.V.C. Stick-up

GW Elevation 132.55 ft (TOC Elevation - Static Water Level)

Standing Well Volume (Calculate by multiplying length of the water column by 0.163 for 2-inch diameter wells and 0.68 for 4-inch diameter wells)

2:34 am/pm gal

Ended Purging Began Purging @ Voiume Purged Indicate ifthe well was purged dry: ves. purged drv after one well volume

Well Purging Method: Peristaltic Pump

WELL PURGING

3:46 am/pm

0Date • '• 7/15 7/15

7/16

•;:fim^\J 2:50 3:18

11:00

Turbidity (NTU)

3.7

12

9

Conductivity (um/cm)

61 64

69

W :̂ 5.21

5.26 5.39

25.2

25.0 24.7

Total Gallons

Removed

0.5 4.0

Cumul. ' Well Volumes Removed

0.1

0.8

Comments

Collected sample

within 24 hours of

purging dry

Instruments used In measuring groundwater quality parameters: Cole Palmer. Model 5938-10 Digital oHATemp/ORP. Oakton EC Tester 0-199 ms. Mvron L Companv Co.. Model DC4 Conductivity Meter. Hach 2100P Turbidimeter Note any observations relevant to the site, monitoring well, or groundwater quality that may be useful in analyzing the groundwater sampling data:

k TriAD

Site Name

Well No.

TrlAD Environmental Consultants Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet

Sapp Batterv

EW-2

Project No.

Date

Field Personnel Weather Conditions Well Depth Static Water Level

Rutherford. Hill, Hobbs Sunnv. 95 °F

60.51 ft (w.r.t. TOC) 38.97 ft (w.r.t. TOC)

Length of Water Column 21.54 ft TOC Elevation 138.97 ft

96-SAP05-Q1

07/15/09

Well Diameter in 4:28 am/pm Well Type: P.V.C, Stick-up


Standing Well Volume 3.5 gal (Calculate by multiplying length of the water column by 0.163 for 2-inch diameter wells and 0.68 for 4-inch diameter wells)

Began Purging @ 4:31 am/pm Volume Purged 10.0 gal Indicate if the well was purged dry:

Ended Purging @ 5:00 am/pm

Well Purging Method: Dedicated QED Bladder Pump

WELL PURGING

;̂:;0atev^

7/15 7/15

7/15 7/15

?; Time :'•

4:35 4.45 4:52

4:58

Turbidity (NTU)

>200 72.5

35.7 14.2

1-

Conductivity (um/cm)

282 286

286 286

''M&. 1.1^ 11%

7.84 7.84

Temp (°C) 23.3

23.3 23.5 23.5

Total ^ Gallons • Removed

1.5 5.0

9.0 10.5

Cumul . Well

Volumes Removed

0.4 1.4

2.6

3.0

^l^dtiifr^hts^^^:

Instruments used in measuring groundwater quality parameters: Cole Palmer. Model 5938-1Q Digital pH/Temp/ORP, Oakton EC Tester 0-199 ms. Mvron L Company Co.. Model DC4 Conductivitv Meter. Hach 2100P Turbidimeter Note any observations relevant to the site, monitoring well, or groundwater quality that may be useful in analyzing the groundwater sampling data;

J, Site Name

Well No.

TriAD Environmental Consultants Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet

Sapp Batterv

EW-3

Project No.

Date

Field Personnel Rutherford. Hill. Hobbs Weather Conditions Sunnv. 95 °F Well Depth 30.62 ft (w.r.t. TOC) Static Water Level 12.44 ft (w.r.t. TOO) Length of Water Column 18.18 ft TOC Elevation 133.76 ft

96-SAP05-01

07/15/09

Well Diameter in 3:48 am/pm Well Tvpe: P.V.C. Stick-up


Standing Well Volume _Z^ gal (Calculate by multiplying length of the water column by 0.163 for 2-inch diameter wells and 0.68 for 4-inch diameter wells)



Well Purging IVIethod: Dedicated QED Bladder Pump

WELL PURGING

?;®^ti;'. 7/15 7/15

7/15

-Litme^ 3:56

4:06 4:15

Turbidity (NTU) 36.7

12.6 15.2

Conductivity (m/cm)

239 244 247

ipSi 4.23

4.48 4.53

^•L '^^ ]^LL '^

' r^ : •.•\:^i,< : ^ ~ y .

22.5 22.9 22.8

Total Gallons

Removed

1.0 4.0

7.0

- Cumul Welh

Volumes Removed

0.3

1.3 2.3

Comments

Instruments used in measuring groundwater quality parameters: Coie Palmer. Model 5938-10 Digital pH/Temp/ORP. Oakton EC Tester D-199 ms. Mvron L Company Co.. Model DC4 Conductivity Meter. Hach 2iaOP Turbidimeter Note any observations relevant to the site, monitoring well, or groundwater quality that may be useful in analyzing the groundwater sampling data:

k Ml

Site Name

Well No.

TriAD Environmental Consultants Groundwater Sampling Data Sheet

Sapp Batterv

EW-4

Project No.

Date

Field Personnel Weather Conditions Well Depth Static Water Level Length of Water Column TOC Elevation

Rutherford. Smilev. Hobbs Sunnv. 95 °F

33.94 ft (w.r.t. TOC) 14.42 ftfw.r.LTOC) 19.52 ft

136.10ft

96-SAP05-01

07/15/09

Well Diameter in 3:05 am/pm Well Tvoe: P.V.C. Stick-up


Standing Well Volume 3.2 gal (Calculate by multiplying length of the water column by 0.163 for 2-inch diameter welts and 0.68 for 4-inch diameter wells)



Well Purging Method: Dedicated QED Bladder Pump

WELL PURGING

Date

7/15 7/15

7/15 7/15

1

Time

3:10 3:24

3:33 3:37

,*riir;bidi0^̂ ::;fNTU)|:

18.6 28.7

16.8 14.2

'̂: ,.;(ijm/Gm):̂ ^^

80 91 90 90

4.52 4.83 4.76

4.78

%>:i:LLLfy

Slfpf

25.6 22.9

22.8 22.8

Total Gallons

Removed

1.0 4.5 9.0 10.0

Cumul. . .Well Volumes Removed

0.3 1.4 2.8

3.1

Comments

Instruments used in measuring groundwater quality parameters: Cole Palmer. Model 5938-10 Digital pH/Temp/ORP. Oakton EC Tester 0-199 ms. Mvron L Companv Co.. Model DC4 Conductivitv Meter. Hach 21 OOP Turbidimeter Note any observations relevant to the site, monitoring well, or groundwater quality that may be useful in analyzing the groundwater sampling data:

APPENDIX C

GROUNDWATER LABORATORY REPORT

TestAmerica THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Job Number: 400-41233-1

Job Description: SAPP Battery NPL Site - Alford, FL

For: SAPP Battery PO BOX 707

Troy, AL 36081

Attention: Chris Rutherford

ApproveQ for release, Carolyn Hooper PrajBct Manager I 7/3V2009a:11PM

Carolyn Hooper Project Manager I

[email protected] 07/31/2009

cc: Ms. Dawn Hudson Mr. Danny Miller Mr. Carl D Williams

The test results in this report meet all NELAP requirements for accredited parameters and relate only to the referenced samples. Any exceptions to NELAP requirements are noted in this report. Pursuant to NELAP, this report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from the laboratory.

TestAmerica Pensacola Certifications and Approvals: Alabama (40150), Arizona (AZ0710), Arkansas (88-0689), Florida (E81010), Illinois (200041), Iowa (367), Kansas (E-10253), Kentucky UST (53), Louisiana (30748), Maryland (233), Massachusetts (M-FL094). Michigan (9912), New Hampshire (250507), New Jersey (FL006), North Carolina (314). North Dakota (R-108), Oklahoma (9810), Pennsylvania (68-00467), Rhode Island (LAO00307), South Carolina (96026), Tennessee (TN02907). Texas {T104704286-08-TX), Virginia (00008), Washington (C2043), West Virginia (136), USDA Foreign Soil Permit (P330-08-00006).

TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.

TestAmerica Pensacola 3355 McLemore Drive, Pensacola. FL 32514

Tel (850) 474-1001 Fax (850) 478-2671 www, testamerjcai n c .com

Page 1 of 2 6

mailto:[email protected]

SAMPLE SUMMARY

Client: SAPP Battery Job Number: 400-41233-1

Lab Sample ID

400-41233-1 400-41233-2 400-41233-3 400^1233-4 400-41233-5 400-41233-6FB

Client

EW-1 EW-2 EW-3 EW-4 EW-1D FB

Client Matrix

Water Water Water Water Water Water

Date/Time Sampled

07/16/2009 1100 07/15/2009 0500 07/15/2009 0425 07/15/2009 0337 07/16/2009 1100 07/16/2009 1100

Daten"ime Received

07/17/2009 0938 07/17/2009 0938 07/17/2009 0938 07/17/2009 0938 07/17/2009 0938 07/17/2009 0938

TestAmerica Pensacola

Page 2 of 26

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y - D e t e c t i o n s


Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Reporting Analyte Resu l t /Qua l i f ie r Limit Units Method

400^1233-1

Lead

EW-1

0.0042 I 0.0050 mg/L 6010B

400-41233-2

Dissolved Antimony, Dissolved

EW-2

0.000058 I 0,0012 mg/L 6020

400-41233-3

Lead


Total Recoverable Total Antimony

EW-3

0.0053

0.000053 1

0.000062 I

0.0050 mg/L

0.0012 mg/L

0.0012 mg/L

601 OB

6020

6020

400-41233-4 EW-4

Dissolved Antimony, Dissolved 0,00022 0.0012 mg/L 6020

400-41233-5


EW-ID

0.000065 1V 0.0012 mg/L 6020


Page 3 of 26

SAMPLE RESULTS


Page 4 of 26

Chris Rutherford SAPP Battery PO BOX 707 Troy. AL 36081

Job Number: 400-41233-1

Client Sample ID: EW-I Lab Sample ID: 400^1233-1

Date Sampled: 07/16/2009 1100 Date Received: 07/17/2009 0938 Client Matrix: Water

Analyte

Method: Dissolved-6010B Prep Method: 3005A Arsenic, Dissolved Cadmium. Dissolved Lead, Dissolved

Mettiod: 601 OB Prep Method: 3010A Arsenic Cadmium Lead

Method: Total Recoverable-6020 Prep Method: 3005A Total Antimony

Method: Dissolved-602Q Prep Method: 3005A Antimony, Dissolved

Result/Qualifier

0.0040 0.0010 0.0020

0.0050 0.0010 0.0042

0.000050

0.000050

U

u u

u u 1

u

u

Unit MDL PQL Dilution

Date Analyzed: 07/23/2009 1449 Date Prepared: 07/22/2009 1004

mg/L 0,0040 0.0050 mg/L 0,0010 0.0050 mg/L 0,0020 0,0050


mg/L 0.0050 0.010 mg/L 0,0010 0.0050 mg/L 0,0040 0,0050


mg/L 0,000050 0.0012


mg/L 0,000050 0.0012

1.0 1.0 1,0

1,0 1.0 1.0

5.0

5.0

Page 5 of 26

Chris Rutherford SAPP Battery PO BOX 707 Troy, AL 36081

Job Number: 400-41233-1

Client Sample ID: EW-2 Lab Sample ID: 400-41233-2


Analyte Result/QualiHer

0.0040 0.0010 0.0020

0.0050 0.0010 0.0040

0,000050

0.000058

u u u

u u u

u

1


Method: Dissotved-601 OB Prep Method: 3005A Arsenic, Dissolved Cadmium, Dissolved Lead, Dissolved

Method: 6010B Prep Method: 301 OA Arsenic Cadmium Lead


Method: Dissolved-6020 Prep Method: 3Q05A Antimony, Dissolved


mg/L 0.0040 0,0050 1.0 mg/L 0,0010 0.0050 1.0 mg/L 0.0020 0.0050 1.0

Date Analyzed; 07/21/2009 1459 Date Prepared: 07/20/2009 1054

mg/L 0.0050 0,010 1.0 mg/L 0.0010 0.0050 1.0 mg/L 0.0040 0.0050 1.0


mg/L 0,000050 0.0012 5.0


mg/L 0.000050 0.0012 5.0

Page 6 of 26


Job Number 400-41233-1

Client Sample ID: EW-3 Lab Sample ID: 400-41233-3


Analyte Result/Qualifier

0.0040 0.0010 0.0020

0,0050 0.0010 0.0053

0,000062

0.000053

U U U

U U

1

1


Method: Dissolved-6010B Prep Method: 3005A Arsenic, Dissolved Cadmium, Dissolved Lead, Dissolved

Method: 601 OB Prep Method: 301 OA Arsenic Cadmium Lead


Method: Dissolved-e020 Prep Method: 3005A Antimony. Dissolved

Date Analyzed; 07/23/2009 1518 Date Prepared: 07/22/2009 1004

mg/L 0.0040 0.0050 1.0 mg/L 0.0010 0.0050 1.0 mg/L 0.0020 0.0050 1.0


mg/L 0.0050 0,010 1.0 mg/L 0.0010 0,0050 1.0 mg/L 0.0040 0.0050 1.0


mg/L 0,000050 0,0012 5,0


mg/L 0.000050 0.0012 5.0

Page 7 of 26


Job Number: 400-41233-1

Client Sample ID: EW-4 Lab Sample ID: 400^1233-4


Analyte

Method: Dissolved-601 OB Prep Method: 3005A Arsenic, Dissolved Cadmium, Dissolved Lead, Dissolved

Method: 6010B Prep Method: 3010A Arsenic Cadmium Lead

Method: Totai Recoverable-6020 Prep Method: 3005A Total Antimony

Method: Dissolved-6020 Prep Method: 3005A Antimony, Dissolved

Resutt/QuaiiFier

0.0040 0.0010 0.0020

0.0050 0.0010 0.0040

0.000050

U

u U

u U U

u


0.00022


mg/L 0.0040 0.0050 1,0 mg/L 0,0010 0.0050 1,0 mg/L 0.0020 0,0050 1.0


mg/L 0.0050 0.010 1,0 mg/L 0,0010 0.0050 1.0 mg/L 0.0040 0.0050 1,0


mg/L 0,000050 0.0012 5,0


mg/L 0.000050 0.0012 5.0

Page 8 of 26


Job Number: 400-41233-1

Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID:

EW-ID 400^1233-5


Analyte Result/Qualifier Unit MDL PQL Dilution

Method: Dissolved-SOIOB Prep Method; 3005A Arsenic, Dissolved Cadmium, Dissolved Lead, Dissolved

Method: 601 OB Prep Method: 301 OA Arsenic Cadmium Lead




0.0040 U mg/L 0.0040 0.0050 1.0 0.0010 U mg/L 0,0010 0.0050 1.0 0.0020 U mg/L 0.0020 0.0050 1.0


0.0050 U mg/L 0,0050 0,010 1.0 0.0010 U mg/L 0.0010 0.0050 1.0 0.0040 U mg/L 0.0040 0.0050 1.0


0.000050 U mg/L 0,000050 0.0012 5.0


0,000065 IV mg/L 0.000050 0.0012 5.0

Page 9 of 2 6


Job Number: 400-41233-1

Client Sample ID: FB Lab Sample ID: 400-41233-6


Analyte Result/Qualifier

0.0040 0.0010 0.0020

0.0050 0.0010 0.0040

0.000050

0.000050

U U U

U U U

U

U


Method: Dissolved-6010B Prep Method: 3005A Arsenic, Dissolved Cadmium, Dissolved Lead, Dissolved

Method: 6010B Prep Method: 301 OA Arsenic Cadmium Lead




mg/L 0.0040 0.0050 1.0 mg/L 0.0010 0.0050 1.0 mg/L 0.0020 0.0050 1.0


mg/L 0.0050 0.010 1,0 mg/L 0.0010 0.0050 1.0 mg/L 0.0040 0.0050 1,0


mg/L 0.000050 0.0012 5.0


mg/L 0.000050 0.0012 5.0

Page 10 of 26

DATA REPORTING QUALIFIERS


Lab Section Qualifier Description

Metals

U

V

Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected.

Indicates the analyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.

The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitation limit.


Page 11 of 26

Job Narrative 400-J41233-1

.eceipt All samples were received in good condition within temperature requirements.

Metafs Method(s) 3005A; Sample 400-41233-1 was field filtered. Sample 400-41233-5 was lab filtered.

Method(s) 6020: The filtration blank for sample 400-41233-5 (dissolved) contained antimony above the method detection limit. This target analyte concentration was less than the reporting limit (RL); therefore, re-extractlon and/or re-analysis of samples was not performed.

Page 12 of 26

METHOD SUMMARY

Client: SAPP Battery

Descr ipt ion

Job Number; 400-41233-1

Lab Location Method Preparation Method

Matrix Water

Metals (ICP) Sample Filtration, Field Sample Filtration Preparation, Total Recoverable or Dissolved Metals Preparation, Total Metals

Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS

Metals (ICP/MS) Sample Filtration, Field Sample Filtration Preparation. Total Recoverable or Dissolved Metals Preparation, Total Recoverable or Dissolved Metals

Lab References:

TAL MOB = TestAmerica Mobile

TAL PEN = TestAmerica Pensacola

Method References:

SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And its Updates.

TAL PEN TAL PEN TAL PEN TAL PEN TAL PEN

TAL MOB

TAL MOB TAL MOB TAL MOB TAL MOB TAL MOB

SW846 60108

SW846 6020

SW846 6020

FIELD FLTRD FILTRATION SW846 3005A SW846 3010A

FIELD FLTRD FILTRATION SW846 3005A SW846 3005A


Page 13 of 26

METHOD / ANALYST SUMMARY


Method Analyst Analyst ID

SW846 6010B St. Pere, Gary GS

SW846 6020 Thompson, Cheri D CDT


Page 14 of 2 6

QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS


Page 15 of 26

Quality Control Results


QC Association Summary

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Report Basis Client Matrix Method Prep Batch

Metals

Prep Batch: 700-70574 LCS 700-70574/2-A LCSD 700-70574/3-A MB 700-70560/1-C MB700-70574/1-A 400-41233-1 400-41233-1 400-41233-1 MS 400-41233-1MSD 400-41233-2 400-41233-2 400-41233-3 400-41233-3 400-41233-4 400-41233-4 400-41233-5 400^1233-5 400-41233-6FB 400-41233-6FB

Analysis Batch:700-70730 LCS 700-70574/2-A LCSD 700-70574/3-A MB 700-70560/1-C MB 700-70574/1-A 400-41233-1 400-41233-1 400-41233-1MS 400-41233-1 MSD 400-41233-2 400-41233-2 400-41233-3 400-41233-3 400-41233-4 400-41233-4 400-41233-5 400^1233-5 400-41233-6FB 400-41233-6FB

Lab Control Sample Lab Control Sample Duplicate Method Blanic Method Blank EW-1 EW-1 Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate EW-2 EW-2 EW-3 EW-3 EW-4 EW-4 EW-ID EW-ID FB FB

Lab Control Sample Lab Control Sample Duplicate Method Blank Melhod Blank EW-1 EW-1 Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate EW-2 EW-2 EW-3 EW-3 EW-4 EW-4 EW-ID EW-ID FB FB

R R D R D R R R D R D R D R D R D R

R R D R D R R R D R D R D R D R D R

Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water

Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water

3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A

6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020

700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574 700-70574


Page 16 of 26

Qua l i t y Con t ro l Resu l t s


QC Associat ion Summary

Report Lab Sample ID

Metals

Prep Batch: 400-93017 LCS 400-93017/25-A MB 400-93017/24-A 400-41233-1 400-41233-1MS 400-41233-1MSD 400-41233-2 400-41233-3 400^1233-4 400-41233-5 400-41233-6FB

Client Sample ID

Lab Control Sample Method Blank EW-1 Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate EW-2 EW-3 EW-4 EW-1D FB

Anatysis Batch:400-93129 LCS 400-93017/25-A MB400-93017/24-A 400-41233-1 400-41233-1MS 400-41233-1MSD 400-41233-2 400-41233-3 400-41233-4 400-41233-5 400-41233-6FB

Prep Batch: 400-93149 LCS 400-93036/6-C MB 400-93036/5-C 400-41233-1 400-41233-1MS 400-41233-1 MSD 400-41233-2 400-41233-3 400-41233-4 400-41233-5 400-41233-6FB

Lab Control Sample Method Blank EW-1 Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate EW-2 EW-3 EW-4 EW-ID FB


Basis

T T T T T T T T T T

T T T T T T T T T T

D D D D D D D D D D

Client Matrix

Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water



Method

301 OA 301 OA 30 IOA 301 OA 301 OA 301 OA 30 IOA 301 OA 301 OA 301 OA

601 OB 60108 60108 601 OB 601 OB 60108 6010B 60108 6010B 60108

3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A

Prep Batch

400-93017 400-93017 400-93017 400-93017 400-93017 400-93017 400-93017 400-93017 400-93017 400-93017


Page 17 of 26



QC Association Summary

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Report Basis Client Matrix Method Prep Batch

Metals

Analysis Batch:400-93256 LCS 400-93036/6-C MB 400-93036/5-C 400-41233-1 400-41233-1 MS 400^1233-IMSD 400-41233-2 400-41233-3 400-41233-4 400-41233-5 400-41233-6FB


D D D D D D D D D D


60108 601 OB 60108 601 OB 6010B 60108 601 OB 60108 6010B 601 OB

400-93149 400-93149 400-93149 400-93149 400-93149 400-93149 400-93149 400-93149 400-93149 400-93149

Report Basis D = Dissolved R = Total Recoverable T = Total


Page 18 of 26



Job Number: 400-41233-1

Method Blank - Batch: 400-93017 Method: 601 OB Preparation: 301 OA

Lab Sample ID: MB 400-93017/24-A Client Matrix: Water Dilution: 1.0 Date Analyzed: 07/21/2009 1424 Date Prepared: 07/20/2009 1054

Analysis Batch: 400-93129 Prep Batch: 400-93017 Units: mg/L

Instrument ID: ICP-AES Lab File ID: N/A Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL Final Weight/Volume: 50 mL

Analyte Result Qual MDL PQL

•Antimony Arsenic Cadmium Lead

Lab Control Sample - Batch: 400-93017

0.025 0.0050 0.0010 0.0040

U U U U

0.025 0.0050 0.0010 0.0040

Method: 6010B Preparation: 301 OA

0.050 0.010 0.0050 0.0050

Lab Sample ID: LCS 400-93017/25-A Client Matrix: Water Dilution: 1.0 Date Analyzed: 07/21/2009 1429 Date Prepared: 07/20/2009 1054

Analysis Batch; 400-93129 Prep Batch: 400-93017 Units: mg/L


Analyte Spike Amount Result % Rec. Limit Qual

Antimony Arsenic Cadmium Lead

1.00 1.00 0.500 1.00

1.03 1.00 0.519 1.02

103 100 104 102

80 -120 80 -120 80-120 80 -120

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.

TestAmerica Pensacola Page 19 o f 26



Job Number: 400-41233-1

Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 400-93017

Method: 601 OB Preparat ion: 3010A

MS Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Date Analyzed: Date Prepared:

400-41233-1 Water 1.0 07/21/2009 1444 07/20/2009 1054

MSD Lab Sample ID: 400-41233-1 Client Matrix: Water Dilution: 1.0 Date Analyzed: 07/21/2009 1449 Date Prepared: 07/20/2009 1054

Analysis Batch: 400-93129 Prep Batch: 400-93017




Analyte % Rec.

MS MSD

102 101 98 98 102 103 101 101

Limit

75-125 75-125 75-125 75-125

RPD

0 0 0 0

RPD Limit

20 20 20 20

MS Qual MSD Qual

Antimony Arsenic Cadmium Lead





Job Number: 400-41233-1

Method B l a n k - B a t c h : 400-93149

Lab Sample ID: MB 400-93036/5-C Client Matrix: Water Dilution: 1.0 Date Analyzed: 07/23/2009 1439 Date Prepared: 07/22/2009 1004


Method: 6010B Preparation: 3005A Dissolved

Instrument ID: ICP-AES Lab File ID: N/A Initial WeighfVolume: 50 mL Final Weight/Volume: 50 mL


Antimony, Dissoived Arsenic, Dissolved Cadmium, Dissolved Lead, Dissolved

Lab Contro l Sample - Batch: 400-93149

0,010 0.0040 0.0010 0.0020

Lab Sample ID: LCS 400-93036/6-C Client Matrix: Water Dilution: 1.0 Date Analyzed: 07/23/2009 1444 Date Prepared: 07/22/2009 1012


U U

u u

0.010 0.0040 0.0010 0.0020

Method: 601 OB

0.050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050

Preparat ion: 3005A Dissolved

Instrument ID: ICP-AES Lab File ID: N/A Initial Weight/Volume: Final WeighUVolume:

50 mL 50 mL

Analyte Spike Amount Result % Rec. Umit Qual

Antimony, Dissolved Arsenic, Dissolved Cadmium, Dissolved Lead, Dissoived

1.00 1.00 0.500 1.00

1.05 1,03 0.517 1.02

105 103 103 102

80 -120 80-120 80 -120 80-120

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors In calculated results.

TestAmerica Pensacola Page 2 1 o f 26

Client; SAPP Battery


Job Number: 400-41233-1

Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 400-93149

MS Lab Sample ID; Client Matrix: Dilution: Date Analyzed: Date Prepared;

400-41233-1 Water 1,0 07/23/2009 1459 07/22/2009 1004


Method: 6010B Preparation: 3005A Dissolved


MSD Lab Sample ID: 400-41233-1 Client Matrix: Water Dilution: 1,0 Date Analyzed: 07/23/2009 1504 Date Prepared: 07/22/2009 1004


Instrument ID: ICP-AES Lab File ID: N/A Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL Final WeightA/olume: 50 mL

Analyte % Rec.

MS MSD

107 104 105 102 106 103 105 102

Limit

75-125 75 - 125 75-125 75-125

RPD

3 2 3 3

RPD Limit

20 20 20 20

MS Qual MSD Qual

Antimony, Dissoived Arsenic, Dissolved Cadmium, Dissolved Lead, Dissolved





Job Number: 400-41233-1

Method Blank - Batch: 700-70574

Lab Sample ID: MB 700-70574/1-A Client Matrix: Water Dilution: 5.0 Date Analyzed: 07/29/2009 1837 Date Prepared: 07/29/2009 0805


Method: 6020 Preparat ion: 3005A Total Recoverable

Instrument ID: Agilent ICPMS Lab File ID: N/A Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL Final Weight/Volume: 50 mL


Antimony, Dissolved Total Antimony

0.000050 0.000050

0.000050 0.000050

0.0012 0.0012

Method B l a n k - B a t c h : 700-70574

Lab Sample ID: MB 700-70560/1-C Client Matrix: Water Dilution: 5.0 Date Analyzed: 07/29/2009 2244 Date Prepared: 07/29/2009 0805


Method: 6020 Preparat ion: 3005A Dissolved

Instrument ID: Agilent ICPMS Lab File ID: N/A Initial Weight/Volume: 25 mL Final Weight/Volume: 25 mL


Antimony, Dissolved 0.00015 0,000050 0.0012



Chain of Cusiody Record /^-y/ZT3

Lab Report No.:

Company:

Address: ^ P [ P P A/yrr^^eY

Rg^ BOK I o n I ^ov A u IGoE'l

Gulf Coast LabNet, Inc. An Environmenta] Lab Services Co.

Phone:(251)625-1331

Fax:(251)625-1299

Phone:'J?'/'^^^-'5^3

Modified from DEP Form #: 62-770.900(2) Page I of 1

FDEP Facility No.:

Project Name: S / \ P P / ^ ^ T T ^ . ^ V A ^ f ^ f l . J l Y ^

Localion: /^ct^cgyeT? ^ F L Project No.:

Sampled by [Print Name]/Affiliadpn

Item No. Field ID No.

• ^

^ ^

M

V*

J

^-Preservative

Login Sample Receipt Check List

„.,ent: SAPP Battery Job Number: 400-41233-1

Login Number: 41233 List Source: TestAmerica Pensacola Creator: Chea, Vanda List Number: 1

Question T / F/ NA Comment

Radioactivity either wfas not measured or, if measured, is at or below N/A background The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. N/A

The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. True

Cooler Temperature Is acceptable. True

Cooler Temperature is recorded. True O-O'C

COC is present. True

COC is filled out in ink and legible. True

COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True

There are no discrepancies between the sample IDs on the containers and False Samples -1&-5 diss, metals was rec'd the COC. unpreserved - needs to be lab filtered. Samples are received within Holding Time. True

Sample containers have legible labels. True

Containers are not broken or leaking. True

mple collection date/times are provided. , True

^propriate sample containers are used. True

Sample bottles are completely filled. True

There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True MS/MSDs VOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is

Login Sample Receipt Check List

_..ent: SAPP Battery Job Number: 400-41233-1

Login Number: 41233 List Source: TestAmerica Mobile Creator: Isbell, Glenn List Creation: 07/28/09 08:33 AM List Number: 1

Question ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ T / F/ NA Comment

Radioactivity either was not measured or, if measured, is at or below True background The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. N/A

The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or Tme tampered with. Samples were received on ice. True

Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True

Cooler Temperature is recorded. True 3.9 C

COC is presenL True

COC is filled out in ink and legible. True

COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True

There are no discrepancies between the sample IDs on the containers and True the COC, Samples are received within Holding Time, True

Sample containers have legible labels. True

Containers are not broken or leaking. True

mple collection date/times are provided. True

,jpropriate sample containers are used. True

Sample bottles are completely filled. True

There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True MS/MSDs VOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is

> •D •o

3 Q.

a

APPENDIX D

EW-1 GROUNDWATER CONTROL CHART

0.14

EW-1 CONTROL CHART Total and Dissolved Lead vs. Time

0" "I ' ' '•—^H r— 1 1 1 1 1 " ^ [ 1 1 1 ~~\—~~\ I ^ ~ i 1 1 1 1 "I I ^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ " ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -

^ ^ ^ ^ S^ S^ Ŝ ^ S^^^S^ P^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ J " 0^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , s ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

Sampling Date

Lead Lead, Dissolved Federal Action Level

s 1HAS

Date post:	06-Feb-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

GROUNDWATER EFFECTIVENESS MONITORING REPORT › work › 04 › 10838826.pdfGroundwater Sampling...

Documents