+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Group 7 - Sajva

Group 7 - Sajva

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: sajal-singh
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 13

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    1/13

    Use of Joint Ventures to Ease the Pain ofRestructuring

    By Ashish Nanda & Peter J. Williamson

    Article presented by:Group 7

    Anupam LavVivek Rokade

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    2/13

    Why the need for a JV?Large corporations wish to refocus their portfolio

    Downfall is to exit businesses that might be high potential but are underperformingSuch businesses are a non core activity of the corporations & hence

    They are deprived of regular & quality management as well as corporate cash

    Huge investments of time and money necessary to develop them are not justifiable

    The solution cleverly undertaken by cos. Like Philips & Honeywell is to restructure

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    3/13

    The Philips Whirlpool casePhilips, in the 1980s, identified that the $1.55 billion domestic appliances business was nolonger essential to its future

    Problems associated were

    Supporting 9 different brands

    Uncoordinated Sales & Distribution between brands as well as countries

    Inefficient use of production capacity across 10 plants located in 5 countries

    Going for an outright sale of the division would have fetched a fire sale price

    Management could still see both tangible & intangible assets in the business

    Underutilized manufacturing capacity

    World class design expertise

    Pan European distribution network 2nd only to Electrolux

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    4/13

    How to go about such a JV?Look for a partner who is wanting to enter the field you intend to exit

    Coincidentally, Whirlpool was exploring options to enter the European market

    It felt that it could radically alter the cost structure of the business by

    Sourcing components globally

    Coordinating production, sales & distribution across countries and product lines

    Whirlpool was unsure of acquiring the domestic appliances division of Philips because

    Concerns regarding the strength of the franchise

    Loyalty of stakeholders in light of the massive change

    Time and money needed to turnaround the business to a lean and focused one

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    5/13

    The SolutionWhirlpool is offered a 53% stake in the Joint Venture at a cost of $381 million with the resowned by Philips

    Whirlpool also has the option to buyout Philips 47% stake within 3 years

    Benefits for Whirlpool

    Learn about the ground realities of the division

    Initiate improvement plans before taking over completely

    Philips management to be available as a sounding board

    Sharing of resources for e.g. Philips IT sytems

    Piggyback on a successful brand Branding products as Philips -Whirlpool intia

    Benefits for PhilipsA smooth exit on favorable terms and completing the sale at a higher value

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    6/13

    Benefits of Such Joint VenturesStakeholders stay engaged & committed

    An announcement of sale could a stroke a wave of uncertainty in the organizationCustomers & Distributors worry about after sales services and support

    Vendors could tighten credit terms and relax delivery and service standards

    Investors go on a selling spree

    The case of Ciba-Corning also shows how this was achieved

    Corning wanted to exit the pharmaceutical business and Ciba was seeking to enter theUS market

    A 50-50 JV was formed in 1985 with Ciba paying up $75 million

    Both partners worked towards making the JV successful and Ciba eventually bought therest of the stake for $150 million in 1989

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    7/13

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    8/13

    Benefits of Such Joint VenturesBuyer receives continued managerial and technical inputs from the seller

    Outright purchases signify the umbilical cord from the parent is cut right awayA JV allows access to the parents brand equity, assets, systems and processes

    The restructurer tutors the buyer to better the performance of the JV so that when he exits thebusiness the returns are higher

    In case of a sale information asymmetry exists

    The seller withholds information lest it turns the deal sour and drive the buyer away!

    In case of Ciba- Corning, Cornings staff was actively involved in introducing Ciba to althe stakeholders and make them comfortable with Ciba.

    Customers, distributors and vendors remained loyal to Ciba even after it Corning left.

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    9/13

    Deciding When a JV makes Sense

    The nature of Restructuring Problem

    Disentangling a business from the systems and structures of parent iscomplex and slow

    In vertical integrations

    Where businesses share facilities , systems,personnel , JV provides asmooth and gradual separation.

    Example : Dresser-Komatsu JV in construction business.

    When important assets are intangibles

    Consumer franchises,Distribution relationship,humanresources,systems

    Example : IBM-Siemens JV for Rolm System (PBX)

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    10/13

    Deciding When a JV makes Sense

    The Goals of the B uying Partner

    JV requires attention , so asset stripes are not interested in JV.

    More relevant to buyer that plans to apply own assets and skills innurturing the business as it learns about it.

    Example Honeywell- Groupe Bull JV (mainframe computerbusiness)

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    11/13

    Minimizing the burden onManagement

    JV requires more management time and attention than singleownership

    Communications often are duplicated

    Contradictory signals from the parties involved has to be resolved

    Minimizing the Burden without reducing the effectivenessEnsuring goal alignment

    Bridging cultural divide

    Selecting staff who can manage effectively without an elaborateorg framework

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    12/13

    Negotiating the DealAcknowledging the business's under-performance and estimating its

    potential

    Seller should focus be on potential , what it could have achieved .

    Buyer should be skeptical of these hidden potential claims

    Sharing financial stakes while shifting management control

    Advantage is when ownership is equally shared with buying partner

    but management control is ceded immediately.Initial share % the buyer seeks signals it's long term intentions .

    Planning for the termination of the venture

    Termination triggers are often left with buyers.

    A smooth termination is better for both the parents.

  • 8/13/2019 Group 7 - Sajva

    13/13

    Thank You !


Recommended