+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Group meeting in Manchester.

Group meeting in Manchester.

Date post: 08-Aug-2015
Category:
Upload: martin-scharm
View: 763 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
37
SYSTEMS BIOLOGY BIOINFORMATICS ROSTOCK SE S simulation experiment management system Evolution of Computational Models in Systems Biology what’s the matter – what’s there – what’s next MARTIN SCHARM Department of Systems Biology & Bioinformatics, University of Rostock http://sems.uni-rostock.de Research Stay in Manchester, 2015 May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 1
Transcript
Page 1: Group meeting in Manchester.

SYSTEMS BIOLOGY

BIOINFORMATICS

ROSTOCKS E Ssimulation experiment management system

Evolution of ComputationalModels in Systems Biologywhat’s the matter – what’s there – what’s next

MARTIN SCHARMDepartment of Systems Biology & Bioinformatics, University of Rostock

http://sems.uni-rostock.de

Research Stay in Manchester, 2015May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 1

Page 2: Group meeting in Manchester.

SYSTEMS BIOLOGY

BIOINFORMATICS

ROSTOCK

Improving the Management of Simulation Studies in Computational BiologyMartin Scharm, Vivek Garg, Srijana Kayastha, Martin Peters, Dagmar Waltemath

Events

S E Ssimulation experiment management system

https://sems.uni-rostock.de

de.NBI InfrastructureWe will provide data management and support for systems biol-ogy projects, with a focus on provenance and reproducibility ofexperimental and modelling results. de.NBI:SYSBIO is part of alarge German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure.WE ARE HIRING!

Ø

p-cyclincdc2-p

p-cyclincdc2

cdc2k

p-cyclin

cdc2k-P

ØcyclinØ

totalcdc2

SBGN-EDSBGN is a markup language to describe mod-els and exchange information about biological sys-tems graphically. We will further develop meth-ods and tools for SBGN-compliant visualisation ofmodel-related information. WE ARE HIRING!

CombineArchive ToolkitSharing in silico experiments is essential for the advance of researchin computational biology. The COMBINE archive is a digital containerformat to easen the management of numerous files and to enable theexchange of reproducible modelling results. We developed the Combin-eArchive Toolkit, consisting of a library, a web interface and a desktopapplication. It support scientists in creating, exploring, modifying, andsharing COMBINE archives.

2MT2MT is our web based platform todemonstrate the capabilities of SEMS-related tools. It exemplifies how ourmodel management solutions can beused in existing tools.

Models as graphsThe increasing diversity of model-related data that is nec-essary to perform a simulation study leads to new chal-lenges in model storage. We developed a concept forgraph-based storage of models and model-related data.Graphs reflect the models’ structure much better, enablelinking of model-related data on the storage layer, and al-low for an efficient search.

MasymosContaining SBML- and CellML models,linked semantic annotations (e.g., from bio-ontologies), simulation descriptions, graph-ical representations and other availabletypes of model-related data, out graphdatabase Masymos can now be queried forcomplete simulation experiments.

MorreOur retrieval engine for models applies In-formation Retrieval techniques to retrieverelevant models from MASYMOS. The pro-posed ranking and retrieval techniques fo-cus on the processing of model meta-information.

Ontology of DifferencesChanges in model versions are manifoldand appear on different layers. We de-velop an ontology of differences occurring inmodel versions. It will support researchersin analysing differences, discovering typicalchanges, summarising major changes andproviding statistics.

Version Control forComputational Models

With thousands of models available, a framework to track the differencesbetween models and their versions is essential to compare and combinemodels. Focusing on SBML and CellML, we developed an algorithm toaccurately detect and describe differences between versions of a modelwith respect to (i) the models’ encoding, (ii) the structure of biologicalnetworks, and (iii) mathematical expressions.

version x-1 version x version x+1

C

D

H E

A

B

C D E

F

G

A

B

D H E

F

G BiVeSArmed with our method for difference detec-tion, BiVeS is able to detect and communicatethe differences in computational models. Thedifferences are exported in several machine-and human-readable formats, ideally suited tobe integrated in other tools.

BudHatBudHat showcases how BiVeS improvesthe understanding of a model’s changes.BudHat calls BiVeS for the comparisontwo versions of a computational model anddisplays the obtained results in the webbrowser.

VW Summer School, March 9-13, 2015During the 2015 Whole Cell summer school we aim todevelop a standard-compliant, open version of the whole-cell model. Eleven tutors and 48 students will hack andcode, model and simulate, layout and annotate the whole-cell model using openly available software and COM-BINE standards. This event is funded by the VolkswagenStiftung.

HARMONY, April 19-23, 2015HARMONY is a hackathon-type meeting of the COMBINE Community,with a focus on development of the standards, interoperability and infras-tructure. Instead of general discussions or oral presentations, the time isdevoted to hands-on hacking and interaction between people focused onpractical development of software and standards. The HARMONY 2015is located at the Leucorea Wittenberg and it is hosted by the groups ofFalk Schreiber and Dagmar Waltemath.

m n

Workshop on Reproducible and Citable Dataand Models, September 14-16, 2015Computational biologists and experimentalists will learnabout standards, citable data, about how to make scien-tific results sustainable, available through open reposito-ries, and about how to find and reuse other people’s worksin a mixture of lectures and hands-on sessions. The work-shop is funded by the ERASYS-APP program.

Ron Henkel

Dagmar Waltemath

Martin ScharmMartin Peters

Vivek Garg

Srijana Kayastha

-

Ad sponsored by Dagmar Waltemath

Page 3: Group meeting in Manchester.

Models evolve over time.Example: C. acetobutylicum

metabolic and gene regulation network model in C. acetobutylicum

Haus et. al. 2011

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 3

Page 4: Group meeting in Manchester.

Models evolve over time.Example: C. acetobutylicum

timeinternal Version Release

PapoutsakisEquations and calculations for fermentations of butyric acid bacteria1984 in Biotechnology and bioengineering

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 4

Page 5: Group meeting in Manchester.

Models evolve over time.Example: C. acetobutylicum

timeinternal Version Release

Papoutsakis

ShintoKinetic modeling and sensitivity analysis of acetone–butanol–ethanol production2007 in Journal of biotechnology

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 4

Page 6: Group meeting in Manchester.

Models evolve over time.Example: C. acetobutylicum

timeinternal Version Release

Papoutsakis

Shinto

COSMIC IA systems biology approach to investigate the effect of pH-induced gene regulationon solvent production by Clostridium acetobutylicum in continuous culture2011 in BMC systems biology

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 4

Page 7: Group meeting in Manchester.

Models evolve over time.Example: C. acetobutylicum

timeinternal Version Release

Papoutsakis

Shinto

COSMIC I

COSMIC II

A shift in the dominant phenotype governsthe pH-induced switch in C. acetobutylicum2013 in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 4

Page 8: Group meeting in Manchester.

Models evolve over time.Example: C. acetobutylicum

timeinternal Version Release

Papoutsakis

Shinto

COSMIC I

COSMIC II

???

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 4

Page 9: Group meeting in Manchester.

Models evolve over time.Example: C. acetobutylicum

timeinternal Version Release

Papoutsakis

Shinto

COSMIC I

COSMIC II

???

some title20?? in some journal

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 4

Page 10: Group meeting in Manchester.

Models evolve over time.Example: C. acetobutylicum

timeinternal Version Release

Papoutsakis

Shinto

COSMIC I

COSMIC II

???

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 4

Page 11: Group meeting in Manchester.

Models evolve over time.Example: C. acetobutylicum

timeinternal Version Release

Papoutsakis

Shinto

COSMIC I

COSMIC II

???

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 4

Page 12: Group meeting in Manchester.

Model EvolutionCase Study: Cell Cycle

Romond1999 Goldbeter1991 Tyson1991

Novak1993 Marlovits1998

Novak1995Novak1997

Moriya2011

Calzone2007

Novak1998

Tyson2001 Chen2000

Chen2004 Queralt2006 Vinod2011

Novak2001

Sriram2007

Csikasz-Nagy2006

Hatzimanikatis1999

Swat2004

Qu2003Ciliberto2003

mammalian R-point (G1/S-transition)

Srividyha2006

Mitotic exit

Budding Yeast

Not in biomodels database

minimal oscillatorNovak1995

Gardner1998

Ibrahim2008a Ibrahim2008b

Ibrahim2009Mitosis

Obeyesekere1997

Conradie2010

Obeyesekere1999

Bai2003

Aguda&Tang1999

Novak2004

Haberichter2007

(G-Phase)

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 5

Page 13: Group meeting in Manchester.

Model EvolutionCase Study: Cell Cycle

Romond1999 Goldbeter1991 Tyson1991

Novak1993 Marlovits1998

Novak1995Novak1997

Moriya2011

Calzone2007

Novak1998

Tyson2001 Chen2000

Chen2004 Queralt2006 Vinod2011

Novak2001

Sriram2007

Csikasz-Nagy2006

Hatzimanikatis1999

Swat2004

Qu2003Ciliberto2003

mammalian R-point (G1/S-transition)

Srividyha2006

Mitotic exit

Budding Yeast

Not in biomodels database

minimal oscillatorNovak1995

Gardner1998

Ibrahim2008a Ibrahim2008b

Ibrahim2009Mitosis

Obeyesekere1997

Conradie2010

Obeyesekere1999

Bai2003

Aguda&Tang1999

Novak2004

Haberichter2007

(G-Phase)

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 5

Page 14: Group meeting in Manchester.

Model EvolutionCase Study: Cell Cycle

CyclinCdc2 P

CyclinCdc2 P

Modeling the cell division...

John J Tyson, 1991

muell

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 6

Page 15: Group meeting in Manchester.

Model EvolutionCase Study: Cell Cycle

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cdc25Cdc25∗ Wee1 Wee1∗

Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte

Bela Novak and John J Tyson, 1993

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Modeling the cell division...

John J Tyson, 1991

muell

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 6

Page 16: Group meeting in Manchester.

Model EvolutionCase Study: Cell Cycle

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cdc25Cdc25∗ Wee1 Wee1∗

Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte

Bela Novak and John J Tyson, 1993

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cdc25Cdc25∗

Mik1 Mik1∗

Wee1 Wee1∗

Quantitative analysis of a molecular model of mitotic control in Fission yeast

Bela Novak and John J Tyson, 1995

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Modeling the cell division...

John J Tyson, 1991

muell

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 6

Page 17: Group meeting in Manchester.

Model EvolutionCase Study: Cell Cycle

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cdc25Cdc25∗ Wee1 Wee1∗

Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte

Bela Novak and John J Tyson, 1993

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cdc25Cdc25∗

Mik1 Mik1∗

Wee1 Wee1∗

Quantitative analysis of a molecular model of mitotic control in Fission yeast

Bela Novak and John J Tyson, 1995

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Modeling the cell division...

John J Tyson, 1991

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Cdc25Cdc25∗

Mik1 Mik1∗

Wee1 Wee1∗

Cyclin

Cdc2 P

Rum1

Modeling the control of DNA replication in fission yeast

Bela Novak and John J Tyson, 1997

muell

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 6

Page 18: Group meeting in Manchester.

BiVeSDifference Detection

A r C

B

D

cycE/cdk2

RB/E2F

RB-Hypo

free E2F

A r

B

C

D

E s

RB/E2F

RB-Hypo

free E2F

cycE/cdk2

RB-Phos

A

r

B

C

D

A

r

B

C

D

E

s

Biochemical Model Version Control System

• compares models encoded in standadisedformats (currently: and )

• maps hierarchically structured content

• constructs a diff (in XML format)

• is able to interprete this diff

<XML>Diff

movesproduct of r: C

deletesproduct of r: B

insertsspecies: Eproduct of r: Ereaction s

</XML>

mapping

diff construction

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 7

Page 19: Group meeting in Manchester.

BiVeS identifies differencesin versions of computational models

C

D

H E

com

mun

icatio

npb

A

B

C D E

F

G

A

B

D H E

F

G

eval

uatio

npb

A

B

C D E

F

G

A

B

D H E

F

Gprop

agat

ionp

b

A

B

C D E

F

G

A

B

D H E

F

Gid=“species1” id=“species1”

initi

alm

appi

ngpb

A

B

C D E

F

G

A

B

D H E

F

G

model version 1model version 2

list of species list of reactions

C + D � E D + H � E

pre-

proc

essin

gpb

Identifying, Interpreting, and CommunicatingChanges in XML-encoded Models of BiologicalSystemsScharm et. al. 2015, under revision at BIOINFORMATICS

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 8

Page 20: Group meeting in Manchester.

BiVeS identifies differencesin versions of computational models

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><bives type="fullDiff">

<update/>

<delete>[...]<node id="6" oldChildNo="1"oldParent="../listOfModifiers[1]"oldPath="../listOfModifiers[1]/modifierSpeciesReference[1]"oldTag="modifierSpeciesReference" triggeredBy="5"/>

<attribute id="7" name="species"

oldPath="../modifierSpeciesReference[1]"oldValue="cdc2" triggeredBy="6"/>

</delete><insert>[...]<node id="12" newChildNo="2"

newParent="../listOfReactants[1]"newPath="../listOfReactants[1]/speciesReference[2]"newTag="speciesReference"/>

<attribute id="13" name="species"

newPath="../speciesReference[2]"newValue="cdc2" triggeredBy="12"/>

<attribute id="14" name="metaid"newPath="../speciesReference[2]"newValue="_818337" triggeredBy="12"/>

</insert>[...]

</bives>

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scharm et. al. 2015, under revision at BIOINFORMATICS

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 9

Page 21: Group meeting in Manchester.

Indeed!models change over time

BIO

MD

0000

0000

01

BIO

MD

0000

0000

21

BIO

MD

0000

0000

41

BIO

MD

0000

0000

61

BIO

MD

0000

0000

81

BIO

MD

0000

0001

01

BIO

MD

0000

0001

21

BIO

MD

0000

0001

41

BIO

MD

0000

0001

61

BIO

MD

0000

0001

82

BIO

MD

0000

0002

02

BIO

MD

0000

0002

22

BIO

MD

0000

0002

42

BIO

MD

0000

0002

62

BIO

MD

0000

0002

82

BIO

MD

0000

0003

02

BIO

MD

0000

0003

22

BIO

MD

0000

0003

42

BIO

MD

0000

0003

62

BIO

MD

0000

0003

82

BIO

MD

0000

0004

02

BIO

MD

0000

0004

22

BIO

MD

0000

0004

42

BIO

MD

0000

0004

62

Apr 05Jun 05Jul 05

Jan 06Jun 06Oct 06Jan 07Jun 07Sep 07Mar 08Aug 08Dec 08Mar 09Jun 09Sep 09Jan 10Apr 10Sep 10Apr 11Sep 11Feb 12May 12Aug 12Dec 12Jun 13Nov 13

0

5

10

50

100

500

1000

5000

14157

Novak1993 12 updates 20 moves 80 inserts 20 deletes

● ●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ● ●●

020

0040

0060

0080

0010

000

1200

0

Ave

rage

num

ber

of n

odes

in th

e X

ML

docu

men

t

Apr

05

Jun

05Ju

l 05

Jan

06

Jun

06

Oct

06

Jan

07

Jun

07

Sep

07

Mar

08

Aug

08

Dec

08

Mar

09

Jun

09S

ep 0

9

Jan

10A

pr 1

0

Sep

10

Apr

11

Sep

11

Feb

12

May

12

Aug

12

Dec

12

Jun

13

Nov

13

020

040

060

080

010

00

Num

ber

of m

odel

s; A

vg n

umbe

r of

spe

cies

/rea

ctio

ns/p

aram

eter

s/ru

les

per

mod

el

●●●●●●

avg number of nodes per modelnumber of models per releaseavg number of species per modelavg number of reactions per modelavg number of parameters per modelavg number of rules per model

●●●●●●

Scharm et. al. 2015, under revision at BIOINFORMATICS

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 10

Page 22: Group meeting in Manchester.

COMBINE 2015In Utah

COMBINE 2015: October 12-16 in Salt Lake City

Day 1: invited talks by Fred Adler, Mike Hucka, Richard Normann, SharonCrook, Miriah Meyer, Huaiyu Mi, Tara Deans, and Anil WipatDays 2-5: contributed talks and discussions.

Chris J. Myers (University of Utah) COMBINE 2015 October 12-16

Ad sponsored by COMBINE initiative

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 11

Page 23: Group meeting in Manchester.

Why am I here?The HERMES program

Provenance for models of biological systems

Woche1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Setup / Aligning Visions

Learning & evaluating tools/workflowsIdentifying research gap

Doing a Case StudyDeveloping a concept and a schedule

Start writing a proposalPlanning future

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 12

Page 24: Group meeting in Manchester.

Why am I here?The unofficial goal

Linked DataResearchObjects

Workflows

Networking

SoftwareEngineering

ProjectManagment

BookmakingPro

vena

nce

Proposal

Coordination

Beer

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 13

Page 25: Group meeting in Manchester.

RO vs CAClear the “mess”

Research Object

-vs-

Combine Archive

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 14

Page 26: Group meeting in Manchester.

Comparison of ArchivesMeans to transfer simulation studies

ZIP Docker VBox CombineArchive ResearchObject

Fancy Icon? × Ø Ø Ø Ø

Aspect 2 × × ~ ~ Ø

Aspect 3 × ~ × Ø ~

Aspect 4 × ~ × Ø Ø

Aspect 5 ? ? ? ? ?

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 15

Page 27: Group meeting in Manchester.

RO – CAClear the “mess”

Research Object Combine Archive

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 16

Page 28: Group meeting in Manchester.

Combine ArchiveWhat are already doing.

internet

internet

SEARCHubiquitin

internet

RESULTSEXPORT

EXPORT

EXPORT

EXPORT

Query databasefor annotations, persons,simulation descriptions

Retrieve informationabout models, simulations,figures, documentation

Export simulation studyas COMBINE archive

Download archiveand open the studywith your favouritesimulation tool

Open archive in CATto modify its contents andto share it with others

internet

API Commincationsenrich your studieswith simulation results

Simulate a Studywith just a single click

Extracting reproducible simulation studies from model repositories using the CombineArchive Toolkit.Scharm et. al., DM4LS @ BTW 2015, Hamburg, GER

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 17

Page 29: Group meeting in Manchester.

Research ObjectWhat are already doing.

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 18

Page 30: Group meeting in Manchester.

RO – CAAll singing, all dancing

��♩

�����

graphics taken from openclipart.org

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 19

Page 31: Group meeting in Manchester.

BiVeS identifies differencesin versions of computational models

Ø What?× Who? When? Why? How? ... ??

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 20

Page 32: Group meeting in Manchester.

Functional Curation ProjectThe WebLab

A call for virtual experiments: Accelerating the scientific process.Cooper et. al., Progress in biophysics and molecular biology (2014).

The Cardiac Electrophysiology Web Lab.Cooper et. al., submitted to Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 21

Page 33: Group meeting in Manchester.

Functional Curation ProjectThe WebLab

A call for virtual experiments: Accelerating the scientific process.Cooper et. al., Progress in biophysics and molecular biology (2014).

The Cardiac Electrophysiology Web Lab.Cooper et. al., submitted to Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Workshop on the Web Lab10th & 11th September 2015Department of Computer Science, University of Oxfordhttp://s.binfalse.de/fcworkshop

Ad sponsored by Jonathan Cooper

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 21

Page 34: Group meeting in Manchester.

SYSTEMS BIOLOGY

BIOINFORMATICS

ROSTOCKS E Ssimulation experiment management system

Thank you!

Dagmar Waltemath, Ron Henkel, Martin Peters, Olaf Wolkenhauer

@SemsProjecthttp://sems.uni-rostock.de

An initiative of:

THE SYSTEMS MEDICINE

WEB HUB

Pictures: Wavebreakmedia Ltd

www.systemsmedicine.net

@sysmednet

sysmednet

The Systems Medicine Web Hub

systemsmedicine.net

www.systemsmedicine.net/feed

SYSTEMSMEDICINE NET

Promote your research

Find jobs and expertsDisseminate your n

ews

Increase your visibility

Be informed

EVENTSREPORTS

RESOURCES

PROJECTSPOSITIONS

Ad sponsored by Olaf Wolkenhauer

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 22

Page 35: Group meeting in Manchester.

SYSTEMS BIOLOGY

BIOINFORMATICS

ROSTOCKS E Ssimulation experiment management system

References

• Sylvia Haus, Sara Jabbari, Thomas Millat, Holger Janssen, Ralf-Jorg Fischer, Hubert Bahl, JohnKing, Olaf Wolkenhauer: A systems biology approach to investigate the effect of pH-induced generegulation on solvent production by Clostridium acetobutylicum in continuous culture. BMCSystems Biology, 2011, 5:10.

• E.T. Papoutsakis: Equations and calculations for fermentations of butyric acid bacteria.Biotechnology and bioengineering, 1984, 26:174–187.

• H. Shinto, Y. Tashiro, M. Yamashita, G. Kobayashi, T. Sekiguchi, T. Hanai, Y. Kuriya, M. Okamoto,K. Sonomoto: Kinetic modeling and sensitivity analysis of acetone–butanol–ethanol production.Journal of biotechnology, 2007, 131:45–56.

• Thomas Millat, Holger Janssen, Graeme J. Thorn, John R. King, Hubert Bahl, Ralf-Jörg Fischer,Olaf Wolkenhauer: A shift in the dominant phenotype governs the pH-induced metabolic switch ofClostridium acetobutylicumin phosphate-limited continuous cultures. Applied Microbiology andBiotechnology, 2013, 97:6451-6466.

• John J Tyson: Modeling the cell division cycle : cdc2 and cyclin interactions. Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences, 1991, 88:7328–7332.

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 23

Page 36: Group meeting in Manchester.

SYSTEMS BIOLOGY

BIOINFORMATICS

ROSTOCKS E Ssimulation experiment management system

• B Novak, J J Tyson: Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control inXenopus oocyte extracts and intact embryos. Journal of Cell Science, 1993, 106:1153-1168.

• Bela Novak, John J. Tyson: Quantitative analysis of a molecular model of mitotic control in fissionyeast. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1995, 173:283–305.

• B Novak, J J Tyson: Modeling the control of DNA replication in fission yeast. Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997, 94:9147–52.

• M Scharm, O Wolkenhauer, D Waltemath: Identifying, Interpreting, and Communicating Changesin XML-encoded Models of Biological Systems. Under review at BIOINFORMATICS.

• M Scharm, D Waltemath: Extracting reproducible simulation studies from model repositoriesusing the CombineArchive Toolkit. In proceedings of the Workshop on Data Management for LifeSciences (DMforLS 2015) at BTW 2015, Hamburg, GER.

• J Cooper, M Scharm, G Mirams: The Cardiac Electrophysiology Web Lab. Submitted toCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology.

• J Cooper, JO Vik, D Waltemath: A call for virtual experiments: Accelerating the scientific process.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2014, 117:1, 99–106.

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 24

Page 37: Group meeting in Manchester.

SYSTEMS BIOLOGY

BIOINFORMATICS

ROSTOCKS E Ssimulation experiment management system

Further Literature

• S Bechhofer, D De Roure, M Gamble, C Goble, I Buchan: Research objects: Towards exchangeand reuse of digital knowledge. In: The Future of the Web for Collaborative Science (FWCS2010); 26 Apr 2010-26 Apr 2010; Raleigh, NC, USA.

• S Bechhofer, I Buchan, D De Roure, P Missier, J Ainsworth, J Bhagat, P Couch, D Cruickshank,M Delderfield, I Dunlop, M Gamble, D Michaelides, S Owen, D Newman, S Sufi, C Goble: Whylinked data is not enough for scientists. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2013, 29(2),599-611.

• FT Bergmann, R Adams, S Moodie, J Cooper, M Glont, M Golebiewski, M Hucka, C Laibe, AKMiller, DP Nickerson, BG Olivier, N Rodriguez, HM Sauro, M Scharm, S Soiland-Reyes, DWaltemath, F Yvon, NL Novère: COMBINE archive and OMEX format: one file to share allinformation to reproduce a modeling project. BMC bioinformatics, 2014, 15(1), 369.

May, 2015 Evolution of Computational Models | Martin Scharm 25


Recommended