Date post: | 14-Feb-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | ranjanarashmi |
View: | 4 times |
Download: | 0 times |
FORDBy group 8Surbhi SinghWasim AkhtarZebaAsthaShilpa GuptaSweta Kumari
1. Will you buy a car online? Consider the experience that you (or your friends or family members ) have had in buying a car . Compare these with the experiences of buying a computer online ( If you have never done this, go to Dell’s website and explore how online computer buying works) . What do you think explains the differences?
In general , we will not prefer to buy car online, unless we are getting significant price difference by buying online.
Comparison of Buying Experiences Buying Car Buying Computer online
Purchasing decision time
More time Less time
Influence of reference group
Significant Less
Evaluation of alternatives
Involves more time and complex
Easy
Option of customization
Restricted Extreme
Other concerns Resale value, safety and reliability
Performance, Speed
Reasons for difference in buying experiences
Buying Car Buying compute online
Category of product High involvement product, more of luxury product, Integral
Moderate involvement or low involvement product, more of necessity, Modular
Role of third party High Less
Ease of purchase Less High
2.What is virtual integration and what benefits Dell derives from virtual integration ?How important are these advantages in the auto business ?
•Virtual integration is a new form of value chain management.Under such a system, the links of the value chain are brought together by informal arrangements among suppliers and customers. •Shipments of the components that the firm needs can be easily arranged through the Internet or a networked computer system. The same type of arrangement allows the firm to fully serve their customers in ordering, services, or any other needs.
A way of capturing the advantage of vertical integration without actually vertically integrating–Vertical integration solves production problems
related to communications, coordination, and control but at a cost of the increased overhead needed to arrange production organization.–Virtual integration therefore is the ability to
achieve the advantage of vertical integration without incurring the overhead.
Benefits derived by Dell
Cost•Eliminates the
cost associated with carrying large inventory of finished goods
Relationship•Good relationship
with the customer
Communication and coordination•Business partners
treated as insiders of the company which speeds up time to market
ControlThe prospect of improved control over the actions of suppliers is another important rationale for virtual integration.
Important in case of Auto Industry
Inherent complexity of the automotive productMany components such as tyres, windscreen wipers, and electrical components are sourced from large suppliers and are same for all companies. So these products can be virtually integrated.
Difficult in case of model specific component.
Being powerful and large company makes it difficult to develop virtual integration ( e.g. Ford supplier network had many layers )
Q3.Compare the enterprise models of Dell & Ford. Do you think the financial performances the two firms are linked to their enterprise
models?
Enterprise Model ComparisonDell
Operating Principles
CustomerIntimacy
DemandPull
Ford Production SystemOrder to Delivery
Supply Chain Mgmt. Leadership
Demand to DeliveryFord Retail Network
FordBreakthrough Objectives/Key
Initiatives
VirtualIntegration
Order to DeliveryFord Product Development
SystemVelocity
Fixed to Variable Cost ShiftModular Assemble
“Extended Enterprise”
Customers frequently steered to PCs with high availability to balance
supply and demand Suppliers maintain nearby ship points;
delivery time 15 minutes to 1 hour
External logistics supplier used to manage inbound
supply chain
Focused on strategic partnerships: suppliers down from 200 to 47
Similarities
Suppliers own inventory until it is used in
production
Demand forecasting is critical—changes are shared immediately
within Dell and with supply base
Demand pull throughout value chain
—“information for inventory” substitution
Complexity is low: 50 components, 8-10 key,
100 permutations
Differences
Dell eliminated the reseller’s markup
Assemble facilities rather than setting up manufacturing
plants which reduces cost
Inventory confined to suppliers reduces the inventory cost
and working capital.
Employees are less in no. in case of Dell
which reduces the expenses.
Financials
–Process Complexity–A large number of suppliers–3 tiers of suppliers–Business was usually over the phone and
fax–Ford a $150billion company enjoys a
tremendous leverage over its suppliers»Annual component price decrease
–Powerful independent dealer network Unionized labor force
4.What do you think is the ideal use of internet in the auto-business vis-à-vis its use in PC industry (you may focus on marketing & distribution, production & purchasing, after
sales service, new product development)?
•Internet technologies helps in interaction with suppliers and customers.•Helps in sharing design databases and methodologies with suppliers•Helps in communicating inventory levels and replenishment needs regularly•Keeps track of the customers which further helps in forecasting demand •Focus on digital advertisement•Online marketing surveys aimed at customers.•Online customer feedback centre. •Solving all the queries and problems of customers by making all the technical support available on the companies website•Customer interactive forum•Enabling MIS.
5.What historical legacies and operational issues do you think will affect Ford’s ability to move to a Built-to-order model?
Ford is 100 yrs old Founded 1903, Dell on the other hand was founded 15 years ago
Product varietyThere is a requirement to manage large number of
individual component inventoriesProduction capacity for individual components get
set long in advance and cannot be changed quickly
Contd…–Process Complexity–A large number of suppliers–3 tiers of suppliers–Business was usually over the phone and fax–Ford a $150billion company enjoys a tremendous
leverage over its suppliers»Annual component price decrease
–Powerful independent dealer network Unionized labor force
6.What practical challenges must Ford address as it tries to establish internet linkages with its supply base and its customers?
• Difficulties in establishing business to business linkages• Difficult to determine feasible and appropriate redesign of the process• Ford supplier network had many more layers and many more companies
as compared to Dell• Lack of technology and technological sophistication that prevail in the
supply chain, especially at lower tiers ( the lower tier suppliers were not able to invest in new technologies)
• To create consistency in technology standards and processes in supplier network
• At Dell, purchasing activities reported into product development organization but at Ford, purchasing was organizationally independent of product development
7. Customer responsiveness initiatives that Ford took to position the company favorably for success
Ford Production system – made production process more responsive and pull based systemReduce the customer order to product delivery time to 15 daysForecasting of customer demand from the dealersHaving regional mixing centers that optimize scheduled deliveries of finished vehiclesRobust order amendment processCreating an experience for the customer in the showrooms that would make him come back frequently (FRN)Superior selling service and more service outlets
Q8. If you were Teri Takai what would you recommend to senior executives? To what extent
should Ford emulate Dell’s business model.
• If Ford is to successfully emulate Dell then they are best able to do this in areas where they have similarities.
• The most notable congruency is in the area of supply of generic components. Here Ford should continue its process of building strategic relationships.
• Where components are of a more specialised nature then Ford should examine the relationships to ascertain whether bringing suppliers closer to the company will offer benefits to both parties
• Ford should work on its' internal culture. Integration of supply chains on the scale practiced by Dell can only occur in an environment where information flows freely to all points of the supply network.
• As outlined in the case documents; Ford maintains a high degree of separation of the purchasing departments from marketing and production. Ford will not be able to provide focus up and downstream unless they themselves are committed to an open culture where logistics information is a part of the life blood of the company.
The relationship with customers is more difficult. The dealer network will probably be averse to Ford moving towards direct sales, as it will threaten their livelihood. They can reap some of the benefits by introducing a web based ordering service for cars, allowing clients to specify the car that they want and then matching the requirement to the cars already in stock through out the network. If a client prefers they could order a vehicle built to order and supplied to a local dealer. This will enable Ford to become closer to the needs of clients, seeing accurately what they want rather than what they buy because it is available.
This compromise will give the company some benefits:• Information about customer wishes.• Opportunity to reduce both dealer stocks and Fords' stocks
by avoiding duplication.• Delaying the final form of the product by increasing the
range of dealer fitted items will enable Ford to simplify manufacture, whilst offering a greater degree of 'real customisation' to clients.
• Delay of final form will increase dealer revenues, buying their enthusiasm and consent for the next stages of coordination.