NEURO-LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING & TRIAL ATTORNEYS:
An Exploration Into Neuro-Linguistic Programming’s Potential
As an Efficacy-Enhancing Tool for Trial Attorneys
A Thesis
Presented to the
Faculty of
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Degree
Master of Business Administration
By
Evan K. Field
2008
SIGNATURE PAGE
THESIS: NEURO-LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING & TRIAL ATTORNEYS
An Exploration Into Neuro-Linguistic Programming’s Potential As an Efficacy-Enhancing Tool for Trial Attorneys
AUTHOR: Evan K. Field
DATE SUBMITTED: Fall 2008
College of Business Administration
Dr. Rhonda Rhodes _____________________________________________Thesis Committee ChairBusiness Administration
Dr. XYZ _____________________________________________Business Administration
ii
ABSTRACT
Even after 30 years of theoretical and practical development of NLP since its
establishment as a discrete area of study in the 1970s, there are still widely differing
interpretations, definitions, and beliefs surrounding NLP. As a result, a broad selection
of “flavors” of NLP exists in the market, supported by proponents and trained
practitioners looking to create their own niche. Exacerbated by these individuals’
sensational claims – even when verifiable – and the apparent similarity between NLP and
many new age concepts, the deliberate and intentional use of NLP has yet to achieve
widespread acceptance in many fields. Instead, much of the documentation on the
practical application of NLP seemed characterized by anecdotal experiences of
individuals in a wide range of circumstances and conditions instead of controlled
scientific studies, which, upon further reflection, is quite understandable given the very
nature of NLP. Specific to this study, it was discovered that while literature on both NLP
and courtroom strategy abounds, there is a limited amount of relevant and reliable data –
empirical or otherwise – regarding the intersection of the two: deliberate use of NLP in
courtroom tactics and trial strategy. It became clear that more must be learned about the
specific application of NLP tools and techniques to the practice of law, particularly in the
courtroom, before being able to develop a distinct hypothesis regarding this subject
matter with any confidence. Therefore, the goals of this study are to:
1. Gain a foundational knowledge and understanding of NLP, its tools, techniques,
and practices;
iii
2. Identify heavily-stressed fundamental skills a trial attorney must practice as
propounded by literature on courtroom techniques and trial strategy and as taught
in law school; and
3. Determine if there appears to be sufficient connection or similarities between
these two topics so as to warrant a subsequent, more in-depth study of NLP’s use
in trial law.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Signature Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Literature Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Research Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
v
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
NLP, or Neuro-Linguistic Programming, is quickly gaining traction as a proven
way to explore and maximize human potential. Described as the study of the structure of
subjective experience and what can be learned from it (Bandler, 1993), it can be found at
use in a number of settings including business, professional sports, the military,
government, and personal development. It has emerged as a viable industry, spurring a
host of students, practitioners, and trainers internationally (Tan, 2006).
This rise in prominence of NLP has left those with interest in human potential
wondering how to apply the techniques and tools of NLP for improving personal qualities
and traits. Users can include salespeople, business executives, managers, attorneys,
teachers, trainers, therapists, doctors, athletes, entertainers, and many more (Dilts, 1999).
The flexibility and pragmatic design of NLP techniques enable them to be adapted to
virtually any situation or circumstance, and can have dramatic effects, both positive and
negative. This study will investigate the correlation and applicability of principles and
techniques of NLP to the practice of law, with an emphasis on litigation.
1.2 Problem Statement
This research will compare the primary techniques and presuppositions of NLP to
skills identified as essential to attorneys engaged in litigation. The following broad steps
have been identified to help organize and analyze the results of the research:
1. Compile a list of essential skills and personal characteristics for practice in
litigation based on opinions and input of attorneys;
vi
2. Distill the fundamental beliefs and techniques of NLP and their targeted area of
improvement; and
3. Determine the association, if any, between these targeted areas of improvement
and skills employed in litigation.
1.3 Importance of Problem
NLP has immense potential. Used incorrectly, it can cause significant negative
disruption of an individual’s mental, emotional, and even physical well-being. Applied
correctly however it can produce powerful changes, such as improving self esteem,
increasing persuasiveness, enhancing communication skills, and reducing or reversing the
damage of prior negative events or memories (Tan, 2008).
Trial attorneys must practice a number of seemingly intangible skills, most
notably (or at least most ostensibly) persuading judges and juries to rule in their favor.
As competing sole-practitioners and firms seek methodologies for improving their
effectiveness in such a complex and multi-faceted profession, determining what, if any,
potential the implementation of NLP techniques can have on enhancing performance will
enable attorneys to evaluate the merits of utilizing NLP in their own practices.
1.4 Qualitative Study
The application of NLP to trial law is an area that, while documented to an extent,
still leaves much to be researched and discovered. As a result, a methodology that allows
for further exploration prior to developing specific theories or hypotheses will be more
appropriate for this study. The grounded theory model of research provided a usable and
vii
effective method for proceeding. The flexibility of the framework would allow for
investigation of the subject matter from a variety of perspectives and viewpoints,
enabling the researcher(s) to gain a more thorough and holistic understanding of the
subject matter. In addition, the qualitative nature of the study meant that as additional
research and exploratory results were obtained, the study itself could be modified and
refined as necessary. This will ultimately result in the formation of relevant, applicable,
and better-constructed hypotheses for subsequent testing.
1.5 Definitions
A number of words and concepts found in the body of text can be defined in
various ways. The following definitions are intended for these words and concepts,
unless otherwise indicated.
Firm, Practice
The entity as a part of which one or more attorneys are practicing law. This
category also includes sole-practitioners, though at times the text may make
reference to both. References to individual attorneys are just that – the individual
person, be they a sole-practitioner or members of a firm. Recognizing that firm
culture may vary significantly in different branch offices, specific references to
branch offices will be included when necessary (e.g. Kreig DeVault LLP,
Indianapolis office).
Litigation
Effectively pursuing litigation requires numerous activities in addition to
performance in the courtroom. For sake of simplicity, litigation as used in this
viii
report will refer to the broad spectrum of litigation-related activities, which may
include things like evidence evaluation, witness interviews and preparation,
negotiation, etc. in addition to actual courtroom presentation.
Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP)
A set of models and principles meant to explore how mind and neurology (neuro),
language patterns (linguistic), and the organization of human perception and
cognition into systemic patterns (programming) interact to create subjective
reality, experience and human behaviors (Dilts, 1999).
Using/Practicing NLP
It can be argued that we all use NLP as a part of our daily regimen, often
subconsciously. For example, emulating behavior, appearance, or language to “fit
in” socially is very similar to a NLP technique for establishing rapport. In the
context of this study however, references to using NLP are intended to denote
those parties that are knowingly and deliberately applying principles and
techniques of NLP in an attempt to produce specific results, such as individuals
that hold themselves out to the general public as practitioners and trainers of NLP
techniques.
1.6 Limitations & Assumptions
There are several assumptions and limitations bounding the data being gathered
and analyzed.
ix
It is assumed that attorneys are self-aware with regard to what skills and
characteristics are essential to effective performance in litigation-related
activities.
It is assumed that individuals providing responses to survey instruments will do so
truthfully and accurately.
The determination of the correlation between NLP’s principles to primary skills
and characteristics of attorneys engaged in litigation is not a definitive statistical
measurement. Rather it is an observation and claim supported and substantiated
by research that there appears to be, or not be, a correlation between the two and
that there exists areas of legal practice that hold a commonality with NLP
principles.
The research is focused on those firms or individual attorneys who are engaged in
activities related to litigation (as opposed to purely transactional, assurance,
advisory, etc.).
1.7 Summary
NLP is a powerful tool that may be able to significantly impact the practice of law
in preparation for and during trial. This chapter has clearly defined the subject of
research, highlighted its importance, introduced the framework for conducting the
research, defined terms and concepts to be used, and presented the limitations and
assumptions of the research. Chapter 2 will introduce a review of literature and
publications dealing with NLP and its potential uses by trial attorneys. Chapter 3 will
x
explain the methodology of gathering the data, Chapter 4 will present an analysis of the
data, and Chapter 5 will offer a conclusion and recommendation for the reader.
xi
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Overview and Definition of NLP
Even after 30 years of theoretical and practical development, there are still widely
differing interpretations, definitions, and beliefs found in the literature regarding Neuro-
Linguistic Programming (NLP). A broad selection of “flavors” of NLP exists in the
market, supported by proponents and trained practitioners looking to create their own
niche. Ironically, one of the characteristics that makes NLP so powerful – its flexibility
to be adapted to each individual’s specific needs and mental, emotional, and physical
state – contributes to the difficulty in presenting a concise and universally accepted
definition.
One definition of NLP is a form of psychotherapy and a model of interpersonal
communication (Colman, 2006). Another common phrase used to define NLP is “the
study of the structure of subjective experience” (Dilts, 1980). Other sources describe it as
a system for using the language of the mind to consistently achieve specific and desired
outcomes (Tad, 2004). These, and the many other “definitions” of NLP as put forward
by its practitioners, generally center around several main concepts, which by explaining
may provide a better understanding of this “art and science” that is NLP (Dilts, 1980).
The human brain is in many ways analogous to an extremely powerful computer
the controls the rest of the body. The nervous system enables people to experience the
world around them by gathering signals from the five senses: visual, auditory,
kinesthetic, olfactory, and gustatory (Bavat, 2003). These signals are processed by the
brain to create an internal representation of that experience, such as pictures, sounds,
xii
feelings, smells, and tastes that are associated with that experience. This internal
representation in turn creates an emotional state – happy, sad, excited, fearful, etc. –
which has corresponding behaviors (James, 2005). This behavioral reaction is not fixed;
rather it has been uniquely programmed into each individual’s brain much like software
on a computer. This “software” can be changed, if the individual knows the right
language with which to instruct their mind. NLP is that language (Hoag, 2008).
NLP draws its name from this concept. “Neuro” refers to the brain and the
nervous system, through which humans perceive the world around them. “Linguistic”
refers to language, the means by which people communicate internally with themselves
and with each other. “Programming” refers to the way the mind creates representations
of experience and the affect on physiology and behavior (Dilts, 1999).
A model of how the brain processes information perceived by the senses is
presented on the following page (James, 2005).
xiii
2.2 History of NLP
NLP originated in the early 1970s with the work of linguistics professor John
Grinder and computer programmer Richard Bandler. Drawing a variety of ideas in
circulation at the time, they studied and explicitly modeled three distinguished therapists
in particular: Fritz Perls, co-creator of gestalt therapy, Virginia Satir (renowned family
therapist), and Milton Erickson, a highly successful hypnotherapist and psychiatrist
(Dilts, 1999). Grinder and Bandler focused on the mental, physiological and linguistic
patterns that set these highly successful therapists apart from their peers, and codified
their findings in several books throughout the 1970s. The premise was that by
identifying those patterns that led to excellence, others could also achieve excellence by
following these models. This use of modeling as a tool or technique to bring about rapid
and effective behavioral change is one of the hallmarks of NLP (Love, 2001).
NLP continued to develop theories and methodologies, and garnered followers in
a wide variety of fields (Dilts, 1999). However reviews in The Journal of Counseling
Psychology and by the National Research Council, part of the National Academy of
Sciences, described NLP as being an unproven technique and its assumptions lacking in
empirical evidence (Sharpley, 1987; Druckman, 1988), lending credence to critics who
view NLP as another eclectic New Age theory with no scientific grounding. Despite this,
the industry around NLP continued to grow and attract avid followers (Carter, 2001).
The last fifteen years has seen a splintering of the NLP community. There was a
falling out among the group who initially developed and advanced NLP, along with a
number of legal disputes over intellectual property issues (Grinder, 1997; ANLP, 2001).
This has been further complicated by the lack of standards or best practices with regard to
xv
NLP certification or training. As a result, practitioner competence, skills, and attitude
vary widely throughout the industry (Schutz, 2008), resulting in the wide variety of
“flavors” of NLP alluded to at the beginning of this section.
2.3 Principles and Theories of NLP
NLP is built upon a number of principles and presuppositions. Due to the
splintering of the NLP community mentioned above, practitioners are not always
consistent in their presentation of some of the principles. One of the most fundamental
premises of NLP is that “the map is not the territory.” Bandler and Grinder borrowed
heavily from the writings and teachings of Alfred Korzybski, a Polish-American
philosopher and scientist, in developing their principles of how people develop
representations of the world (Bandler, 1975). The expression conveys the idea that an
abstraction of something, or a reaction to something, is not the thing itself, just as a map
is a representation of the land but not the actual land itself. As applied to human
experience, people’s brains create representations or maps of sensory input, which is
what each individual considers to be “reality” (Love, 2001). This model of reality
determines their feelings, thoughts, and behaviors, much like the behavior of a navigator
would be dictated by his or her map. The danger is that maps can become “outdated” or
lose validity as life changes (Hoag, 2008). To address this issue and achieve consistent
success and excellence, the goal – through NLP – is to create the richest map possible so
that the individual can perceive the greatest number of choices and perspectives (Dilts,
1999). A list of other common principles and presuppositions of NLP is presented here.
Respect for the other person’s model of the world.
xvi
Behavior and change are to be evaluated in terms of context and environment.
Resistance in a client is a sign of a lack of rapport. There are no resistant clients,
only inflexible communicators. Effective communicators accept and utilize all
communication presented to them.
People are not their behaviors. Accept the person; change the behavior.
Everyone is doing the best they can with the resources they have available.
Behavior is geared for adaptation, and present behavior is the best choice
available. Every behavior is motivated by a positive intent.
Calibrate on Behavior – the most important information about a person is that
person’s behavior.
Each person is in charge of their mind and therefore their results.
People have all the resources they need to succeed and to achieve their desired
outcomes. There are no unresourceful people, only unresourceful states.
All procedures should increase wholeness.
There is no failure, only feedback.
The meaning of communication is the response received.
The system/person with the most flexible behavior will control the system.
All procedures should be designed to increase choice.
2.4 Techniques and Applications of NLP
One of the most common applications of NLP is to assist in establishing rapport
with other individuals. Derived from the French verb rapporter meaning “to bring back,”
the English word rapport refers to a relationship or communication characterized by
xvii
harmony (Sandoval, 2001). Because life will inevitably involve interaction with other
people, the ability to consistently communicate effectively with others is invaluable. In
fact it has been argued that communication skills are the most important professional
asset because without them, one can not motivate or exert influence (Rankin, 1999).
A specific technique NLP proposes for developing rapport is called “matching and
mirroring.” This consists of copying one or more aspects of the nonverbal
communication in such a way as to create the perception – usually subconscious – that
you are similar to the other person (Bayat, 2003).
Another common technique of NLP is called anchoring. Anchoring was
described by Bandler and Grinder as the tendency for any one element of an experience
to bring back the entire experience. Anchors can be any unique sensory stimulus such as
a gesture or a touch, and can be set up intentionally to trigger a desired response by
enacting the anchor (Kirby, 1995). This is similar to classical conditioning and Pavlov’s
famous experiment.
Another significant technique in NLP is reframing. Reframing is used to develop
different ways of thinking or to shift one’s interpretation of meaning (Dowlen, 1996).
The underlying concept is that any stimulus an individual receives only has meaning in
the frame or context in which it is perceived. If a person views a situation as a liability,
his brain will produce states and resulting behaviors that make it reality. If however that
person changes how he represents that same situation to himself and perceives it as
something other than a liability, he can change his states and behaviors (Robbins, 1987).
xviii
2.5 Review of Skills Required by Trial Attorneys
Law is an extremely diverse profession, so much so that there is no “typical”
lawyer. There are, however, a number of basic skills that are generally required of all
lawyers. They include (Schwartz, 2008):
Legal analysis
Reading comprehension
Impromptu public speaking
Rehearsed public speaking
Listening
Empathy
Workload management
Factual investigation
Questioning other people
Brainstorming solutions to problems
Synthesizing
Selecting from among possible solutions to problems
Negotiating
Researching
Helping people in conflict work out compromises
Identifying connections among ideas
Passion
From this list, though not by any means exhaustive, it appears that an attorney will spend
a significant portion of his time communicating with others, both in and out of the
xix
courtroom.
The importance of an attorney’s ability to communicate well is highlighted when
looking closer at a selection of these essential skills (LSAC, 2008).
Listening: Lawyers must be able to take in a great deal of information, often on
topics about which they are unfamiliar. The ability to listen to clients and
understand their unique issues and concerns is essential.
Synthesizing: Because of the complexities of many issues and the number of laws
either directly or tangentially relevant, lawyers must learn to pull together often
large amounts of material into a meaningful, focused, and cogent presentation to
give to others.
Advocating: As an advocate, the lawyer’s role is to represent his or her client’s
particular point of view and interests as vigorously as possible. The American
judicial system assumes that equitable solutions will emerge from the clash of
opposing interests. The success of this adversarial system of American law
depends upon the talents and training of the lawyers who work as advocates
within it. Lawyers must be able to use their advocacy skills to marshal evidence
and present arguments as to why a particular outcome is desirable.
Counseling: Lawyers also spend a good deal of their time giving clients legal
advice. Few ventures in the modern world can be undertaken without some
understanding of the law. Through their knowledge of what the law involves,
lawyers advise clients about partnerships, decisions, actions, and many other
subjects. In many cases, the lawyer’s role as a counselor serves as much to
prevent litigation as to support it.
xx
Writing and Speaking: Whether in the courtroom or the law office, lawyers must
be effective communicators. If lawyers could not translate thoughts and opinions
into clear and precise English, it would be difficult for the law to serve society.
After all, the law is embodied in words, and many of the disputes that give birth to
laws begin with language—its meaning, use, and interpretation. Litigation leads
to written judicial opinions; congressional enactments are recorded as printed
statutes; and even economic transactions must be expressed as formal, written
contracts.
Negotiating: One of the lawyer’s primary roles is reconciling divergent interests
and opinions. When the parties to a proposed transaction disagree, the lawyer,
acting as a facilitator, may be able to help them negotiate to a common ground.
Although the client’s interests are a lawyer’s first priority, often those interests are
served best after compromise and conciliation have paved the way to an equitable
settlement. Because lawyers are trained to see the implications of alternative
courses of action, they are often able to break an impasse.
2.6 Current Use of NLP in Trial and Trial Preparation
There are a number of anecdotes illustrating the use of NLP by lawyers. However
there has been limited attention focused on the use of NLP in the courtroom setting as a
whole (Mayers, 1993). Rather, NLP has gained traction with specific activities in the
trial process, similar to the way trial consulting came into vogue. With trial consulting,
marketing professors sympathetic to the cause of anti-war protesters in the early 1970s
helped them fight charges of civil disobedience and other protest-related crimes by
xxi
conducting telephone polls, focus groups, and interviews with potential jurors. Soon,
lawyers were regularly seeking out trial consultants for assistance with a variety of facets
of the trial process (Carter, 2001).
Many proponents of NLP introduce it as a way to improve communication and
influence with others. More specifically, NLP can be used as an powerful technique in
the courtroom that works not only with juries but with the judge as well (Carter, 2001).
This ability to communicate effectively can be extended even further, for example when
interviewing or examining witnesses. Once rapport has been developed between the
interviewer and the witness, barriers disappear, trust grows, and information is exchanged
more easily and smoothly (Sandoval, 2001).
Using NLP to better engage the jury is also taught by some practitioners. Humans
are sensory beings, and by using sensory-oriented descriptions that appeal to multiple
senses, the interest level of the listeners along with their attentiveness and ability to relate
to the subject of the testimony will be increased (Mayers, 1993). Because everyone
learns through a combination of different senses, it is important that a presentation
incorporates all the avenues of juror learning in order to make a lasting impression. By
being able to discern how a judge or jury learns, the lawyer is able to best present the
case by telling the story in a strategically structured way (Carter, 2001). Furthermore, by
using multi-sensory presentation techniques, there will be a cumulative effect on the
listener’s ability to recall the presented information (Vesper, 2004).
Anchoring can also be used to improve the impact of a presentation. A lawyer
can marry a message, theme, or testimony to a particular trigger such as an exhibit, a
gesture, or even a specific location in the room. The lawyer then only needs to activate
xxii
the trigger to recall and reinforce the anchored message for the jury (Vesper 2004). Some
attorneys execute this strategy by anchoring the concept and details of a specific element
of the case to a single location. Whenever the attorney returns to that spot, or even points
to it, the jury recalls what they have been told about that element (Carter, 2001).
One other aspect of an attorney’s courtroom performance that is of great
importance is to guide the jury to see and understand the evidence the way the attorney
wants them to. NLP, through specific strategies, facilitates this transfer of information
and understanding from one individual to another (Mayers, 1993). Reframing is one
technique used to shift people’s interpretation of meaning by altering cause-effect
relationships or changing the context. For example, in the first hearing regarding the
beating of Rodney King in 1991, the defense attorneys were able to establish that the
video was not as it appeared and in fact Mr. King was resisting arrest or was on drugs
that put him out of control and the officers in danger. By creating this context, the
attorneys were able to guide the jury into believing that the police behavior was
appropriate, contributing to the acquittal of the officers. When tried in federal court
however, there was not as concentrated an effort to shift the context of the video – i.e., to
reframe the jury’s understanding of the evidence – but the officers instead suggested that
King had it coming. Two of the officers were found guilty and sentenced to prison
(Lisnek, 1993).
2.7 Summary
NLP centers around understanding how people perceive and experience the world
around them, how that perception in turn affects their state of mind and ultimately their
xxiii
behavior, and how to utilize this understanding to accomplish various goals. Some of
these goals may include enhanced effectiveness in communication, increased influence,
and improved transfer of mutual understanding. NLP has mixed acceptance across a
variety of fields and practices, but continues to be taught and its efficacy widely touted by
supporters. Although there is some disagreement among practitioners, there are a number
of principles and presuppositions of NLP that are commonly accepted.
All effective attorneys must possess certain essential skills, many of which are of
particularly importance to trial attorneys. These include the ability to communicate well
with others, persuade others to accept a particular position or point of view, and
effectively guide others to interpret information as desired. NLP is currently being used
by some lawyers in trial situations to improve their performance, though the profession
has not focused a great deal of attention on the utilization of NLP as a holistic approach
to practicing law.
xxiv
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Selection of Research Methodology
As revealed by reputable and scientifically conducted studies (Sharpley, 1987;
Druckman, 1988), there lacks conclusive and empirical “proof” that NLP can consistently
and effectively bring about the changes its practitioners regularly claim are possible.
Therefore the question should not be whether the researcher can conclusively assert that
NLP is a valid system for improving trial attorney performance and effectiveness.
Indeed, NLP is often presented as only one tool or “toolbox” (with its specific techniques
being the tools) among many for enhancing personal performance and effecting
behavioral changes (Bayat, 2003).
Instead, a methodology that allowed for further research and discovery prior to
developing more specific theories was more appropriate for this study. The grounded
theory model of research provided a usable and effective method for proceeding. The
flexibility of the framework would allow for investigation of the subject matter from a
variety of perspectives and viewpoints, strikingly similar to a major objective of NLP. In
addition, the qualitative nature of the study meant that as additional research and
exploratory results were obtained, the study itself could be modified and refined as
necessary.
Ultimately, the differences in utilizing this approach will manifest themselves in
the formulation, execution, and analysis of research.
xxv
3.2 Data collection
The goal of the initial research will be to probe the existence of a substantive
connection between the goals and applications of NLP and the skills required of trial
attorneys. Employing the methodology described in Section 3.1 above, the identification
(or lack) of a substantive connection would result in the formulation of a hypothesis
regarding the potential of NLP as an efficacy-enhancing tool for trial attorneys.
To explore this connection, research will be conducted to further define and
present specific techniques and applications of NLP and their apparent results. Similarly,
research will be conducted to better present the skill requirements and expectations of
trial attorneys. A thorough comparison will be performed to determine whether the
connection is strong enough to warrant a subsequent perhaps quantitative or empirical
study into the efficacy (or potential efficacy) of NLP in enhancing trial attorney
performance.
For ease of comparison in research objectives, a table is presented here with the
two major primary research topics – NLP and Trial Attorney Skills – as the headers.
NLP Trial Attorney Skills
Data Subject MatterSpecific techniques, outcomes pursued/desired, “typical” results
More concrete list, most critical skills defined, ranking of importance
Data Source NLP Practitioners and TrainersLaw school students, law school professors, practicing trial attorneys
Data Location VariesWestern State University College of Law, Loyola Law School, various office locations
Data Collection Timing Over 1 month period Over 1 month periodData Collection Method Interviews (phone/personal), Interviews (phone/personal),
xxvi
surveys surveys
3.3 Summary
This study would be best suited by pursuing a qualitative design that will allow
for preliminary exploration and discovery before constructing a specific, discrete
hypothesis. The researcher will simultaneous explore and further define the topics of
NLP, particularly the techniques and results, and essential trial attorney skills. If a
comparison of the two yields a substantive connection or complementary relationship,
then the groundwork will be laid for initiating a deeper study into the potential of NLP as
an efficacy-enhancing tool for trial attorneys.
Evan Field – GBA 695PLANNED REVISIONS
New Title: Neurolinguistic Programming in Law Firms: Strategic Implications for Organizational Performance
Consistent with a more qualitative approach, a discrete hypothesis will not be developed prior to the research, but rather a series of research questions/areas are formed, research conducted, and a hypothesis emerges to explain the results of the research (grounded theory methodology). Accordingly, the following set of research questions is proposed:
(1) What is NLP and what are its common tools, techniques, and applications?(2) What individual attorney skills support the pursuit and achievement of
organizational objectives/high job performance?(3) What are (if any) the potential strategic implications for the organization of
applying NLP tenets to enhance individual attorney skills?
Question (1) has (hopefully) been substantially undertaken already with the current proposal's literature review; I will likely flesh out additional detail and add additional information, possibly through some additional interviews with NLP practitioners and trainers. Question (2) will require additional research, as some of the content in the current proposal can be used but does not address the broader issue of identifying common organizational objectives and linking them to individual skills. This area of research will
xxvii
draw from literature, the pedagogy and substance of legal education, and attorney interviews/surveys; the incorporation of surveys and interviews to elicit the research material would make an IRB application applicable at this stage. The methodology described in the proposal will be strengthened and clarified to better explain the utility and appropriate rigor of a grounded theory approach. Discussion points/questions used to guide research might include the following:
Size of the organization If the organization is public or private Area of practice (e.g., civil litigation, public agency, private criminal defense,
business assurance and advisory, family law, estate planning, etc.) Interviewee’s primary role(s) in the organization (e.g., courtroom
representation/oral argument, witness interaction, firm marketing/client development, research, document drafting, etc.)
Level of influence in strategic decision making and direction setting for the organization
Top high-level priorities in the organization (e.g., particular financial goals, "win" rate, long-term stability/security, number of attorneys on staff, organizational efficiency, measurable level of client satisfaction, high economic value to client, high level of trial avoidance [e.g., through strong contractual protection, effective negotiation], recognized leadership in one or more specific markets/industries, support for certain causes/policies through case selection/pro-bono work [e.g., protection against governmental violation of civil rights, protection of criminal defendant rights, attacking "corporate greed"], etc.)
How are these priorities operationalized – i.e., are there specific policies or training or processes adopted in support of these organizational priorities
How are the organization’s performance assessed (i.e., how is success measured) What individual skills do attorneys (as conveyed through training/orientation,
company policy, etc.) believe affect the organizational priorities identified above, i.e, what skills, if practiced with competency when acting in an individual capacity as an advocate for the client, will have an impact on the organization's priorities
Why/how do these skills impact the organization's objectives How substantial of an impact will improving or mastering these skills have on the
organization's achievement of objectives What is being done to develop these skills
The responses to these surveys and interviews will be combined with results from literature, analyzed, categorized, and summarized/key results extracted. The write-up of this research question would constitute the research findings in the final report. Question (3) will focus on highlighting and fleshing out the emerging theory that may identify (or deny) any strategic implications for an organization of applying NLP tenets to enhance the capabilities of individual attorneys. Areas (2) and (3) are closely
xxviii