Date post: | 04-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | raul-dolo-quinones |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 1/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 1
API Gas Lift Design
• API RP 11V6: Recommended Practice for Design
of Continuous Flow Gas Lift Installations ---- Using Injection Pressure Operated Valves
• By Sid Smith
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 2/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 2
INTRODUCTIONS
PLEASE TELL US THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION ABOUT YOURSELF:
Name
Work LocationJob (role)
Number of Years Experience
Gas Lift Background- hands on- previous training
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 3/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 3
Design Outline• Introduction (20)• General Design (20)
• Inflow & Outflow &…….Tubing (45)• Facilities (15)
• Gas Inj. Pressure (15)• Mandrels & Valves (30)• Temperature (15)• Gas Passage (15)
• Design Methods:.Constant Rate (30).Variable Rate (30).Intermittent (15).Equilibrium Curve (45)
• API Example # 1 (45)
• API Example # 2 (45)
• API Example # 3 (45)
• Summary (15)
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 4/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 4
0. Introduction :API RP 11L6
• RP to provide guidelines, proceduresand recommendations. See other APIRP’s. (Also ISO documents)
• 1 Scope: Guidelines for continuousflow using injection pressure valves
• 2 Intent: Maximize production and. Minimize costs
• 3 Definitions• 4 General Design Considerations
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 5/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 5
S.V.
Continuous Intermittent
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 6/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 6
Typical continuous flow gas lift installation
Injection gas into wing valve and then downthe casing-tubing annulus.
Well equipped with tubing, side pocket mandrels,
wireline retrievable gas lift valves and asingle production packer located justabove the producing zone.
Note: Upper gas lift valves closed and
gas enters gas lift valve near bottom.
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 7/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 7
4.1 General
• Complete system!
• Combination of concepts and experience
• Continuous flow gas lift has advantages
and limitations.
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 8/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 8
Continuous GL Strengths
• Flexible lift capacity
• Handles sand OK• Deviated holes OK
• Permits wire line op
• Tubing fully open
• High GLR beneficial
• Low well R&M
• Low surface profile
• Compatible /SSSV’s• Permits sounding
• Easy BHP surveys
• Permits PL surveys
• Dual lift feasible
• Tolerates bad design
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 9/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 9
Continuous GL Weakness• High back pressure imposed
• Needs uninterrupted high pressure gas
• Compressor expenses often high• Heading problem with low rates
• Potential gas freezing & hydrate problem
• Increased friction w/low gravity crude
• Valve interference & high inj. point
• Corrosion, Scale, & paraffin
• Efficient dual lift difficult
• Requires excellent data for good design
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 10/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 10
• Inject gas as deep as feasible
• Conserve injection pressure• Ensure upper valves stay closed
• Be able to work down to bottom• Check for ample gas passage
• Plan for changes in rate
• Avoid heading conditions
• Minimize costs & Maximize rates
GL Design Guidelines
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 11/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 11
Types of Installations• Conventional (Tubing): Inject gas down
annulus & produce up tubing.• Annulus: Inject gas down tubing & produce
up annulus• Special: Slim-hole, Dual, Concentric, etc
• Open installation: No packer or SV• Semi-closed: Packer but no SV
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 12/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 12
IPV UNLOADING
How do we inject gas into a well in the first place?How do we inject gas into a well in the first place?
This process of replacing the completion brine with injection gas is calledunloading and it is done only once after the initial completion and after any wellservicing where the casing to tubing annulus is filled with liquid.
Pressure
D e p t h
SBHP
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 13/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 13
IPV UNLOADINGGas is injected into the casing - tubing annulus and the pressure pushes the brinethrough each of the gas lift valves which are wide open. This is a particularly dangeroustime for the valves. If the differential is too high the liquid velocity can be enough to cutthe valve seat. Then, the valve will not be able to close and the design will not work.
Pressure
D e p t h
SBHP
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 14/200
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 15/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 15
IPV UNLOADINGOnce the brine level is below the top valve, gas will enter thetubing and begin lifting the well. If the tubing pressure is less thanthe SBHP the reservoir will begin to contribute. The firstproduction from the reservoir is normally recovered completionbrine.
Pressure
D e p t h
SBHP
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 16/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 16
IPV UNLOADINGWhen the second valve is uncovered, gas will begin to enter
the tubing at the second
valve.
Pressure
D e p t h
SBHP
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 17/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 17
IPV UNLOADINGIn the case of IP valves, the injection gas rate into the well at the surface must beregulated to control the gas entry to approximately the design rate of one valve. Sincetwo valves are passing injection gas, the pressure in the casing annulus will fall .
Gas from
casing 500
mcfd
Gas to
casing 500
mcfd
Gas from
casing 500
mcfd
+500
-500
-500
With more gas leaving casing than entering, the injection pressure mustfall.
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 18/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 18
IPV UNLOADING
When the casing pressure falls enough, the top valve will close basedon valve mechanics in a good design.
Pressure
D e p t h
SBHP
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 19/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 19
IPV UNLOADING
Since there is still more casing pressure than tubing pressure at thebottom valve and the bottom valve is still open, the injection gas willcontinue to displace the brine in the annulus until the third valve isuncovered.
Pressure
D e p t h
SBHP
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 20/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 20
IPV UNLOADINGOnce again with more gas leaving the casing through two valves, thecasing pressure will fall until the second valve closes. Obviously if therewere more valves deeper the unloading process would continue.
Pressure
D e p t h
SBHP
What would happen if the third
valve injected too much gas?
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 21/200
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 22/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 22
4.2 Well Performance
(Inflow and Outflow)
Well Productivity: A well’s ability to
produce fluids related to a reduction in
bottom hole pressure
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 23/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 23
Inflow:Pseudo-Steady-State-Radial
• Qo = C*k*h*(Pr-Pwf) .
. Bo*µ*[Ln(Re/Rw)-0.75+S+Dq]
• Qo = J *(Pr-Pwf) or J = Qo/(Pr-Pwf)
• Where J = PI = Productivity Index
• Specific PI = J/h
• C= 0.00708 bpd Oilfield Units• 1/C = 141
(After Darcy)
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 24/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 24
Inflow:
Flow into Well from the Reservoir • PI = Productivity Index=J (in bfpd/psi)
• Note: PI for single phase flow• PI=Change in Rate/Change in Pressure
• PI=Rate/(Pr-Pwf) in bfpd/psi• Rate in bfpd =Ql = PI * (Pr-Pwf)
• Drawdown = ∆P=(Pr-Pwf) = Rate/PI
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 25/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 25
PI Problem # 1B• Given: Pr = 2500 psig (172.4 bar)=Pb
• Pwf = 1750 psig (120.7 bar)
• Ql = 1500 BPD (238.5 m^3)
• Find: PI, Qmax, &Ql @ 500 psig (34.5 bar) &
Pwf if Ql = 3000 BPD (476.9 m^3)
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 26/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 26
IPR_VOG: VOGEL OIL WELL IPR
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
PRODUCTION RATE (BPD) OR (M^3/D)
P W F ; F L O W I N G
P R E S S U R E ( P S
I A ) O R ( k P a )
NO SKIN WITH SKIN
Pr
Pwf
Qmax
PI = 1500/(2500-1750) = 2 bpd/psi
o
PI Problem # 1B when Pb= 0
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 27/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 27
It is more accurate to describeWell Productivity in terms of:
Multi-phase, radial-flow
This means it handles flow ofboth liquids AND gas,
which changes the curve
This method is called:
Inflow Performance Relationshipor IPR
INFLOW PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 28/200
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
00.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Producing Rate (Q/Qmax) ratio
I n t a k e P r e s s u r e ( P w f / P r ) r a t i o
Vogel IPRQ=1-0.2*(Pwf/Pr)-0.8*(Pwf/Pr)̂ 2
Initial slope = -1.8
x
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 29/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 29
Inflow: Vogel IPR
• Ql/Qmax=1-0.2(Pwf/Pr)-.8(Pwf/Pr)^2
• Ql/Qmax=1-v*(Pwf/Pr)-(1-v)*(Pwf/Pr)^2
• For multiphase flow
• Need well test rate (Ql), Pr & Pwf
• Find pressure ratio: Pwf/Pr
• Find production ratio: Ql/Qmax =(x1)
from graph• Calculate Qmax: Qmax = Ql/(x1)
• Once Qmax known, find other rates
IPR F tk i h Q /Q = [1 P f2 /P 2]n n=1
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 30/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 30
IPR_VOG: VOGEL OIL WELL IPR
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
PRODUCTION RATE (BPD) OR (M^3/D)
P
W
F ; F L O W
I N G P
R E S S U R E ( P S I A
) O R
( k P a )
NO SKIN WITH SKIN
x
IPR Fetkovich: Qo/Qm = [1- Pwf2 /Pr2]n n=1
Initial Slope = -2.0
Ratio 1/1000
n>.5n< 1
TypicallyN=.8
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 31/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 31
Combination PI & IPR Problem• Given:
• Pr = 2800 psi ; Pb = 1800 psi• Pwf = 2300 psi ; Ql1 = 500 bpd
• Find: Qb, Qa, Qmax &Ql2 @ Pwf = 900 psig
• Solution: Just divide into a• PI + IPR problem
F P > Pb)
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 32/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 32
IPR_VOG: VOGEL OIL WELL IP
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
PRODUCTIONRATE (BPD) OR(M̂3/D)
P W F ; F L O W
I N G P R E S
S U R E ( P S I A )
O R
k P a
NOSKIN WITHSKIN
Pr= 2800
Pb=1800
Qmax
Pwf=2300PI = 1.0
Slope = - 1.8
For Pr > Pb)
Qb
Qa
ox
PI + IPR Vogel
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 33/200
Now youknow how tofind the
well’s inflow
Use PI for single-phase flow
Use IPR for multi-phase flow
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 34/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 34
Outflow Introduction
• Flow from perforations to storage tanks
• Requires a good vertical flow correlation• Also a horizontal flowline correlation
• Learn to use pressure-depth (gradient)curves
• Draw tbg outflow performance curves
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 35/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 35
Gas Sales
Oil
Pwf
PI or IPR Inflow
Outflow
Pr
Pwh
Psep
Inflow & Outflow Analysis
Flowline:Gradient Curves
Tubing Performance:Gradient Curves
X X
Tank
STB
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 36/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 36
Outflow: Multiphase Vertical Flow
• Empirical Models
• Gilbert (CA oil wells)-developed 1940 to1950 but published in 1954
• Poettmann & Carpenter (no slip) -1952
• Baxendell & Thomas (high rate extension of P&C)-1961• Duns & Ros (lab data)-1961
• Ros & Gray (improved D&R)-1964
• Hagedorn & Brown (most used--slip?)-1964
• Orkiszewski (Exxon composite)-1967• Beggs & Brill (incline flow)--1973
• MMSM ( Moreland-Mobil-Shell-Method)-1976
• Mechanistic Models $
• Aziz, Grover & Fogarasi-1972• OLGA –Norwegian- 1986
• Ansari. Et al. – 1990
• Choksi, Schmidt & Doty-1996• Brill, et al-ongoing
Shell : Zabaras-1990
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 37/200
Flow
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 38/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 38
FlowRegimes
Single Phase Flow
Bubble(y)
Plug or Piston
Slug or Churn
Annular
Mist
Above Bubble Point
Slightly below BP
Bubbles grow
Bubbles connect
and expand
Oil up tubing wallwith gas at higher
velocity up center
Gas with oil droplets
(Surface)
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 39/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 39
Water Cut Effect on Gradient
0 35 65 95 100 Water Cut (%)
γo
0 42 psi/ft
γw
As per ROS with Shell
Gradient
psi/ft
(.46+)
(.38+)
(Lab tests)
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 40/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 40
Outflow: Find Pwf: Case 1
• Given: Tubing ID = 1.995 inchesRate = 800+ bpd
• Cut = 50%+,GOR = 1200, GLR = 600• Pwh=440 psig, Flow Surf. Temp =100 ‘F
• Well Depth = 5100’,• BH Temp = 180 ‘F, Water SG = 1.074
• Oil Gravity = 35 ‘API, Gas SG = 0.65• Static BHP = 2060 psig
• Find Pwf & PI (Find the correct chart)
440 1560
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 41/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 41
440
5100’Gradient =0.42 psi/ft
2800’
7900’
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 42/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 42
Outflow Example• Case 1: Find Pwf = 1560 psig
from 800 BPD graph• Calculate PI = Prod/Drawdown
• PI = 800/(2060-1560) = 1.6 BPD/psi
• Problem B: Find Pwh for a Pwf of 1200psig?
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 43/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 43
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 12
0
1
2
3
T h o u
s a n d s
PRODUCTIOPN RATE (BPD) OR (M̂ 3/D) P W F ; F L O W I N G P R E
S S U R E ( P S I A ) O R ( k P a )
IPR TBG-1 TBG-2 TBG-3
OIL WELL INFLOW & OUTFLOW PERFORMANCEA 6000 ft flowing well with GLR = 500 and 10% WOR
Production Rate in BPD
1.995” 2.441” 2.992”
Pwf
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 44/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 44
Outflow: Summary• Essential to have a good multiphase flow
program or gradient charts
• Use well test data & correlation to find Pwf
• Calculate PI or IPR for each well
• Construct tbg perf curves• Select most profitable tbg size
• Size flowline (Typically same as tubing)
• Minimize Back-pressure and Maximize Rate
T bi Si G id li
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 45/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 45
Tubing Size Guideline
• In both flowing & gas lift wells, the size oftubing is critical.
•Too large a size results in heading, loadingup, and unstable flow.
• Too small a size results in excessive
friction and loss of production.• For best results, use the following:
1.995” ID-- 200 to 1000 bfpd
2.441” ID-- 500 to 1500 bfpd2.992” ID-- 1000 to 3000 bfpd3.958” ID-- > 3000 bfpd
TUBINGPERFORMANCE(OUTFLOW)CURVES
Typical Tubing Curves
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 46/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 46
.
0 1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4
5
Thousands
T h o
u s a n d s
RATE(BFPD)
P w f : B H
F l o w i n g T u b i n g P r e s s u r e ( P S
I G )
1.995"
2.441"
2.992"
3.467"
3.958"
TUBING PERFORMANCE (OUTFLOW) CURVESFOR10,000 FT WELL W/ 1000 GLR& 50%CUT
Typical Tubing Curves
Rate in 1000 BFPD
Pwf
in1000psi
PI’s
Pwh = 100 psig
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 47/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 47
4.4 Facilities
• John Martinez
GL S f E i t
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 48/200
GL Surface Equipment
API Manual Chapter 4
API RP 11V7
Consultant
Testing
Treating CompressionDehydration
DistributionMetering Miscellaneous
XX
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 49/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 49
A TypicalGas Lift
System
A TypicalGas Lift
System
DehydratorO
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 50/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 50
GL Surface Gas Facilities (49)
• GL is a system type AL; thus, all componentsmust operate efficiently
• Freezing often a problem requiringdehydration, heaters, or methanol injection
• Most important & expensive are the
compressors.• Proper piping & good meters are essential for
accurate gas measurement
• Manifolds to distribute the gas & adequateseparation/treating are also important
• Plus controls--all are some of our favoritethings
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 51/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 51
Simple SystemSimple System
Inflow
Outflow
Stock
tank
sales
GL Compression
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 52/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 52
GL Compression
• Reciprocating & Centrifugal• One --economical but all eggs in one basket
Two - most practical; Three -- allows better
maintenance; >3 -- too expensive
• Need high reliability (>96 %) [< 1
day/month]• Low suction Pressure (< 100 psia)
• Adequate discharge pressure !• Adequate cooling System
• Good maintenance important
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 53/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 53
Piping, Distribution, Metering
• Provide good operating and maintenance
plus minimize investment• Keep back-pressure low!
• Adequate separation & scrubbing• Follow good piping practices
• Provide for pigging and traps• Install gas meters properly (GPSA)
Choke-Regulation Control
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 54/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 54
Choke Regulation Controlfor Gas Lift Well
Meter Run
Pg Pio(0)
4 5 Gas Injection Pressure
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 55/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 55
4.5 Gas Injection Pressure• Has a large effect on efficiency and
operation of continuous flow GL wells
• Too high a pressure results in
needless investment of compressors &lines
• Need enough pressure to inject nearbottom ( 100 ft above perforations) atthe planned rate.
• Request suction pressure < 100 psig
• See paper by J.R. Blann, JPT Aug. 84
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 56/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 56
Depth,(ft)
Pressure (psig)
14001000600
x400 bpdx500 bpd
x600 bpd
x700 bpd
Gas Injection Pressures, psig
Equilibrium Curve
Benefit from Higher Gas Injection Pressure
0
Dw
x 200 bpd
Gas Injection Pressure
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 57/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 57
Gas Injection Pressure
• For the system, select an injection gas pressurethat will permit well gas injection just above the
producing zone.• Install pressure recorder at well and record
pressure for a minimum of 24 hours. The
pressure variation should be less than 100 psi.
• Use average gas injection pressure recorded at
the well for gas lift design. No safety factorshould be necessary.
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 58/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 58
Kick-Off Injection Gas Pressure
• If available, allows deeper lift.
• Normally not practicable in multi-wellinstallations.
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 59/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 59
References/Bibliography• Clegg, JD; S.M. Bucaram; N.W. Hein Jr.:
Recommendations and Comparisons for Selecting
Artificial-Lift Methods,” JPT Dec 93• Neely, Clegg, Wilson, & Capps: “Selection of Artificial
Lift Methods: A Panel Discussion,” SPE 56th Annual
Fall Meeting Oct 81• Redden, Sherman, & Blann: “Optimizing Gas-Lift
Systems,” SPE 5150 , 1974
• Winkler & Smith: Camco Gas LIft Manual 1962
• Brown: “The Technology of Artificial Lift Methods”
• API Recommended Practices 11V8
API
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 60/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 60
API
MandrelSee API 11V1
And ISO 17078-1
API Mandrel Selection Guideline
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 61/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 61
G Lift M d l
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 62/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 62
Gas Lift Mandrels
• Conventional--Tubing Retrievable• Side-pocket--Wireline Retrievable (Oval or Round)
• Connections same as tubing (avoid crossovers)
• Material normally 4130
• Valve Receptacle 1” or 1.5”
• With Guard and Orienting Sleeve
• Drift to tbg size; Fluid Passage (S)
• Internal test pressure-to tbg rating
• External test pressure to max collapse case• Check clearance; Min spacing 90 ft
• Plastic coating (optional--Drift check after coating)
4 7 G Lift V l
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 63/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 63
4.7 Gas Lift Valves
• Conventional (Tubing Retrievable)
• Wireline Retrievable *
• Valve size : 0.625”, 1.0” & 1.5” *• Closing Force: Gas Charged*, Spring Loaded;
Combination Spring-Gas
• Valve Type: Injection Pressure Operated*;Dummy; ...Production Pressure Operated;Pilot; Orifice; Other
• Flow Configuration: Type 1*,2, 3, or 4• Service Class: Standard *; SCC
• Reference API Spec 11V1 & ISO 17078-2
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 64/200
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 65/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 65
Typical Gas Lift Valves
BK-1
BK
R20
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 66/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 66
Gas Lift Valves Guidelines
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 67/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 67
Gas Lift Valves Guidelines
• Use a 3-ply bellows-- single-element, unbalanced valvew/ a nitrogen charged dome and/or a spring
• Choice between: Injection Pressure* orProduction Pressure (Fluid) Operated.
• Use reverse flow (check) valve in each
• Age valve and shelf test
• Standard Monel Seats or Solid Carbide• Use Orifice Valve w/ check on bottom
• Dummy all unused mandrels
• Consider combination Gas-charged & Spring- loadedfor set pressures > 1500 psi (Field Experience)
• Use screened orifice/nozzle-Venturi on bottom
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 68/200
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 69/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 69
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 70/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 70
In an IPO valve, highpressure nitrogen in thedome exerts pressure on
the inside of the bellows.This causes the bellows toextend down and pushesthe ball on the seat.
In an IPO valve, highpressure nitrogen in thedome exerts pressure onthe inside of the bellows.This causes the bellows toextend down and pushesthe ball on the seat.
Nitrogenpressure
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 71/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 71
Gas from the casing tries toget into the valve. Thepressure acts on the outsideof the bellows, trying tocompress the bellows.
Gas from the casing tries toget into the valve. Thepressure acts on the outside
of the bellows, trying tocompress the bellows.
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 72/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 72
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
Fluid from theproduction tubing triesto force the stem off theseat.
Fluid from theproduction tubing tries
to force the stem off theseat.
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 73/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 73
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
When the valve opensgas moves through thevalve and out the nose.
When the valve opensgas moves through thevalve and out the nose.
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 74/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 74
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
The valve is in the closed positionnow.
What it take to get this valve open?
Let’s look first at the forces trying toclose the valve.
The valve is in the closed positionnow.
What it take to get this valve open?
Let’s look first at the forces trying toclose the valve.
AbAb
PbPb
Closing force = Pb* (Ab)
where:
Pb = nitrogen pressure
Ab = area of the bellows
IPO G/L VALVE BEHAVIOR
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 75/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 75
Now the opening forces:Now the opening forces:
Opening force = Ppd (Ap) + Piod(Ab - Ap)
where:
Ppd = tubing pressure
Piod = casing pressure
Ap = port area
Ab = bellows area
ApAp
PpdPpd
PiodPiod
The casing pressure onlyacts on this area when the
valve is closed.
Ap
Ab
IPO G/L VALVE OPENING BEHAVIOR
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 76/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 76
IPO G/L VALVE OPENING BEHAVIOR
The solutionThe solution
The valve begins to come open whenthe opening and closing forces are
equal.
Pb (Ab) = Ppd (Ap) + Piod(Ab - Ap)
For a given Pb we could solve for Piod
the pressure at which the valve shouldopen.
Or for a design case of Piod and Ppd,
we could solve for the correct Pb.
ApAp
PpdPpd
PiodPiod
AbAb
PbPb
Test RackSet Pressure
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 77/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 77
Piod
Ppd
Pb
Unbalanced pressure
charged valve
Ppd=0
Pb
Pvo
Set Pressure
Test Rack Set Pressures, Pvo
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 78/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 78
• Simple Injection Pressure Operated Valve wherewell forces ready to open valve:(1) Pb*Ab = Piod *(Ab-Ap) + Ppd * Ap
• For Test rack conditions where Ppd = 0:(2) Pb *Ab = Pvo * (Ab-Ap)
• Then by substitution:(3) Pvo * (Ab-Ap) = Piod *(Ab-Ap) + Ppd * Ap
• Or: (4) Pvo = Piod + Ppd *Ap/(Ab-Ap) and by
• definition Ap /(Ab-Ap)=Ap/Ab/(1-Ap/Ab) = PPEFCorrect for Shop temperature for bellows charged valve
Pvo = [Ppd*PPEF+Piod]*Ct
TABLE A OILFIELD UNITS)
TYPICAL INJECTION PRESSURE VALVES WITH CHARGED NITROGEN BELLOW
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 79/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 79
RETRIEVABLE GAS LIFT VALVES
VALVE Ab PORT (MONEL) Ap/Ab Ap/Ab
OD BELLOWS SIZE SIZE RATIO (1-Ap/Ab)
(IN) (IN^2) (IN) (1/64") Mfg PPEF
------- ------- ------- ------- (MONEL) (MONEL)
1.5 0.77 0.1875 12 0.0380 0.0395 0.77 0.2500 16 0.0670 0.0718
0.77 0.3125 20 0.1040 0.1161
0.77 0.3750 24 0.1480 0.1737
0.77 0.4375 28 0.2010 0.2516
0.77 0.5000 32 0.2620 0.3550
1.0 0.31 0.1250 8 0.0430 0.0449
0.31 0.1875 12 0.0940 0.1038 0.31 0.2500 16 0.1640 0.1962
0.31 0.2813 18 0.2070 0.2610
0.31 0.3125 20 0.2550 0.3423
0.31 0.3750 24 0.3650 0.5748
Test Rack Set Pressure: Example
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 80/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 80
Test Rack Set Pressure: Example
• Given: XXXXX 1-inch BK valve w/ 3/16” portw/monel seat. Find PPEF = 0.1038 (mfg. data)
• Pio=Csg pressure @ valve depth=1060 psig• Ppd =Tbg pressure @ depth = 420 psig
• Tv = Valve Temp @ depth = 121 ‘F• Tshop = 60 ‘F (Valve temp in shop)
• Find from Table 4-1 that Ct = 0.88
• Thus: Pvo = [PPEF*Ppd+Pio]*Ct
• Pvo = [0.1038*420+1060]*0.880= 971 psig
Well Name: Exampl joe PRESS URE (Pv) 1000 PSIA
TEMPERATURE COR. FACTORS TEMP.in Shop (Ts) 60 'F
(F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct)
61 0.998 101 0.916 141 0.847 181 0.787 221 0.735 261 0.690
62 0.996 102 0.914 142 0.845 182 0.786 222 0.734 262 0.689
63 0 993 103 0 912 143 0 843 183 0 784 223 0 733 263 0 688
API Gas Lift ManualTable 4 1
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 81/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 81
63 0.993 103 0.912 143 0.843 183 0.784 223 0.733 263 0.688
64 0.991 104 0.910 144 0.842 184 0.783 224 0.732 264 0.687
65 0.989 105 0.909 145 0.840 185 0.781 225 0.730 265 0.686
66 0.987 106 0.907 146 0.839 186 0.780 226 0.729 266 0.685
67 0.985 107 0.905 147 0.837 187 0.779 227 0.728 267 0.68368 0.982 108 0.903 148 0.836 188 0.777 228 0.727 268 0.682
69 0.980 109 0.901 149 0.834 189 0.776 229 0.726 269 0.681
70 0.978 110 0.899 150 0.832 190 0.775 230 0.724 270 0.680
71 0.976 111 0.898 151 0.831 191 0.773 231 0.723 271 0.679
72 0.974 112 0.896 152 0.829 192 0.772 232 0.722 272 0.678
73 0.972 113 0.894 153 0.828 193 0.771 233 0.721 273 0.677
74 0.970 114 0.892 154 0.826 194 0.769 234 0.720 274 0.676
75 0.968 115 0.890 155 0.825 195 0.768 235 0.719 275 0.675
76 0.965 116 0.889 156 0.823 196 0.767 236 0.717 276 0.674
77 0.963 117 0.887 157 0.822 197 0.765 237 0.716 277 0.673
78 0.961 118 0.885 158 0.820 198 0.764 238 0.715 278 0.672
79 0.959 119 0.883 159 0.819 199 0.763 239 0.714 279 0.671
80 0.957 120 0.882 160 0.817 200 0.761 240 0.713 280 0.670
81 0.955 121 0.880 161 0.816 201 0.760 241 0.712 281 0.669
82 0.953 122 0.878 162 0.814 202 0.759 242 0.711 282 0.668
83 0.951 123 0.876 163 0.813 203 0.758 243 0.710 283 0.667
84 0.949 124 0.875 164 0.811 204 0.756 244 0.708 284 0.66685 0.947 125 0.873 165 0.810 205 0.755 245 0.707 285 0.665
86 0.945 126 0.871 166 0.808 206 0.754 246 0.706 286 0.664
87 0.943 127 0.870 167 0.807 207 0.753 247 0.705 287 0.663
88 0.941 128 0.868 168 0.805 208 0.751 248 0.704 288 0.662
89 0.939 129 0.866 169 0.804 209 0.750 249 0.703 289 0.661
90 0.937 130 0.865 170 0.803 210 0.749 250 0.702 290 0.660
91 0.935 131 0.863 171 0.801 211 0.747 251 0.701 291 0.659
92 0.933 132 0.861 172 0.800 212 0.746 252 0.700 292 0.65893 0.931 133 0.860 173 0.798 213 0.745 253 0.698 293 0.657
94 0.929 134 0.858 174 0.797 214 0.744 254 0.697 294 0.656
95 0.927 135 0.856 175 0.795 215 0.743 255 0.696 295 0.655
96 0.925 136 0.855 176 0.794 216 0.741 256 0.695 296 0.654
97 0.924 137 0.853 177 0.793 217 0.740 257 0.694 297 0.654
98 0.922 138 0.851 178 0.791 218 0.739 258 0.693 298 0.653
99 0.920 139 0.850 179 0.790 219 0.738 259 0.692 299 0.652
100 0.918 140 0.848 180 0.788 220 0.736 260 0.691 300 0.651
(F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct) (F) (Ct)
Table 4.1
Temperature Correctionfor
Nitrogen Charged Bellows
1000 psia & 60 ‘F
Table 4-1 Page 40 (Program CT TEMP)
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 82/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 82
Table 4 1 Page 40 (Program CT_TEMP)Temperature Correction Factors for Nitrogen
• Based of 60 F’ and Pbv = 1000 psig
• ‘F Ct• 121 .880
• Where: Ct =1/[1.0+ (Tv(n)-60) x M/Pbv]
• For Pbv<1238 psia :M=3.054xPbv^2/10000000+1.934xPbv/1000-2.26/1000
• For Pbv> 1238 psia :M=1.804xPbv^2/10000000+2.298xPbv/1000-2.67/10
AGL_SET:INJECTIONPRESSUREVALVEDESIG
E l
P 1 ?
Calculate Valve Set Pressures
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 83/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 83
Example
0
500
1000
1500
2000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
DEPTH(ft) of (meters)
P R E S
S U R E
s i o r b a r
INJ GAS TBG Temp VALVESPACING
420
1060
121o150 o
: Pvo1= ?
121135
145
Gg=.03
Gf=.15
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 84/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 84
4 10 Temperature
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 85/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 85
4.10 Temperature
• Determine Surface Static and
…………...Reservoir Static Temperatures• Calculate Static Gradient
• Measure Flowing Temperature fordifferent rates
• Never use static for design basis
• Design on estimated production rate
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 86/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 86
AGL_TEMP: FLOWING TEMPERATURE PROFILE
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
T
E
M
P
E
R
A
T
U
R
E
( ' F
)
o
f
' C
STATIC TEMP FLO W TEMP
Static
Flowing
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 87/200
IsothermalGradient Map
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 88/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 88
Gradient Map
1.2
Kirkpatrick Correlation
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 89/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 89
• Example:Ql =2250 bpd through 3.5” Tbg• Well Depth = 5500’ , BHT = 180 ‘F
• Geothermal Gradient =(180-75)/(5500/100) =1.9 ‘F/100’
• Solution: intersection of 2250/1.5 =1500 bpd & 1.9 GG find flow GG =
1.0 ‘F/100’• Flowing Surf Temperature =
180 - 1.0*5500/100 = 125 ‘F
Fig. 6-9 Kirkpatrick
Fig 6-9 KirkpatrickChart to be used directly for 2.5” tubing
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 90/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 90
Chart to be used directly for 2.5 tubing For 2” tubing, multiply rate by 2For 3” tubing, divide by 1.5
1.9
Temp Computer Program Solution
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 91/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 91
Temp Computer Program Solution
• “Predicting Temperature Profiles in aFlowing Well,” by Sagar, Doty &Schmidt
• Also for gas lift wells
• For multi-phase flow: Regressionanalysis--- many assumptions
• Check against real field data
VERSION 8.0db
Flowing Temperature
ExampleWell Name
2003**PREDICTING TEMPERATURE PROFILES**14-Aug-06
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 92/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 92
(OILFIELD = E; METRIC = M)E or MEUnit Selection15
mcfd0Qi:Gas Lift Inj. Rate14
'F125Twh =Flowingft*0Di: Depth of Gas Inj.*13
-0.0043SGM2:CORRECTIONft5,500Dw: Total Well Depth12
-0.0043SGM1:CORRECTIONin7.000CSG: Casing OD11
1.00E-04A2: COEf.in3.500OD: Tubing OD10
1.21E-04A1: COEF.air=10.700SGi: SG Gas (Air = 1)9
#N/AU2:HEAT t.c.sp.gr.1.060SGw: SG. Water 8
121.22U1:HEAT t.c.'API40.0API: Oil Weight7
lbm/sec8.23Wt2:MASS FLOWmcfd750Qg:Form. Gas Rate6
lbm/sec8.23Wt1:MASS FLOWbwpd250Qw:Water Rate5
sp.gr.0.825SGo: OIL wt.bopd2000Qo:Oil Rate4
't2.306f:DIM.TIME'F180Tf:Temp of Formation3
BTU/lbm0.542Cpl:SPEC. HEAT'F75Ts: Temp.Surf.Static2
'F/100'1.909Tg:TEMP GRADpsi100Pwh: Wellhead Pressure1
--CALCULATIONS----INPUT DATA---
p
Temperature data
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 93/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 93
Temperature data
• API Gas Lift Manual & API RP11V6• C.V. Kirkpatrick “The Power of Gas”
• K.E. Brown “The Technology of ArtificialLift Methods,” Volume 2a
• Sagar, Doty & Schmidt, “FlowingTemperature Profiles in a Flowing Well”
• Winkler & Eads, “ Algorithm for more accurately
predicting nitrogen-charged gas lift valve operationsat high pressures and temperatures”
4 12 Gas Passage
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 94/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 94
4.12 Gas Passage
• Use the minimum size port (choke) thatwill pass the desired rate of gas!
• Check Valve Port size for amount of gaspassage that is possible
• Use Thornhill-Craver Equation/Chart• Make Gas Gravity & Temp Correction
• Predict on high side
• Use next higher standard port/orifice
Upstream:i d
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 95/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 95
Piod
SGg=
Tv =
Pb
port
Ppd
square-edgeorifice
Thornhill-Craver Chart: Example
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 96/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 96
• Find corrected gas throughput (Qgi)• Given: Upstream Pressure (Piod)=1000 psig
• Downstream Pressure (Ppd)= 790 psig
• Orifice Size (Valve Port) = 12/64”
• Temperature of valve = 160 ‘F
• Gas SG = 0.75• Find from chart : Qgi = 660 MCFD
• From Correction Chart find: Cc = 1.17• Actual Qgi = 660/1.17 = 564 MCFD
Choke Chart
660
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 97/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 97
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 98/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 98Cc=
x
Orifice/Choke Problems
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 99/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 99
• Orifice/Choke Problem # 1
• Upstream Pressure = 1250 psig
• Downstream Pressure = 1150 psig• Valve Port Size = 8/64 inch
• GG = 0.7 & Temp @ Depth = 180 ‘F• How much gas can be Injected?
• What size orifice for Injection GAS Volumeof 850 MCFD?
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 100/200
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 101/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 101
Typical VPC Gas-Lift Valve Performance PlotFig. 1
Camco BK with
12/64ths VPCPvoT= 964 Pcf=920 Temp=150
Camco BK with16/64ths VPCPvoT= 964 Pcf=920 Temp=150
Camco BK with20/64ths VPCPvoT= 964 Pcf=920 Temp=150
F l o w r a t e - ( M s c f / d )
Downstream Pressure - (psig)
0
500
1000
1500
0 200 400 600 800 1000
(after Decker & Dunham)
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 102/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 102
Comparison of Gas-Lift Valve Performance Based on VPC ModelVs. Performance Based on Thornhill-Craver Model
Fig. 2
Camco BK with12/64ths VPCPvoT= 964 Pcf=920 Temp=150
Camco BK with12/64thsThornhillPvoT= 964 Pcf=920 Temp=150
F l o w r a t e - ( M s c f / d )
Downstream Pressure - (psig)
0
200
400
600
800
0 200 400 600 800 1000 API
Pvo(n) = Test rack opening
pressure for nth valve
Pcf = Injection gas pressure
Nozzle-Venturiif l
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 103/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 103
Gas Lift Valve
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 104/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 104
GasInjectionRate
Production Pressure
Pressures Acting on anPressures Acting on an
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 105/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 105
Production Pressure
P ~ Tubing
Pressure
The pressure down-
stream of ball is nearly
equal to the tubing
(production) pressure.
Injection Pressure > P
> Tubing pressure
Injection Pressure. This
pressure is greater than
the pressure downstream
of the ball.
Large pressure
drop, large
suction force on
ball, small gap
between ball
and seat
The gas injection rate
through the valve is reducedas the valve throttles closed.
essu es ct g o ag
Unchoked ValveUnchoked Valve
Pressures Acting on aPressures Acting on a
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 106/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 106
P ~ Tubing
Pressure
P ~ Tubing
Pressure
The pressure down-stream of
the ball is held higher by the
choke.
Injection Pressure
Small pressure
drop, small
suction force on
ball, more gap
between ball
and seat
Large
pressure
drop
The gas injection rate
through the valve is higher
because the valve ball is
held off of the seat by the
higher pressure beneath
the ball.
Choke
gg
Choked ValveChoked Valve
Comparison Between Choked
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 107/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 107
Plot of Injection Rate vs. Pressure
Unloading Gas-Lift Valve with Choke vs. Valve with no ChokeUsing Gas-Lift Valve/Choke Model
Macco R-1D3/16" port10/64" chokePc = 1200 psiPt = 325 psi
Note that choked valve remainsopen over entire range andactually transmits much more gas.It "snaps" closed when closingpressure is reached.
Choked
Unchoked
and Unchoked Valves(After Dunham, Decker, & Waring)
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 108/200
Graphical Solution--Gas Lift Spacing
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 109/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 109
Gas Lift Spacing.........................
• Need to space mandrel/valves to permit working to thelowest possible depth
• You will learn to space using different techniques--depending on type valve
• Find the location of the first valve
• Injection Pressure Operated Valves
• (1) Constant Rate Design*
• (2) Variable Rate Design• (3) Intermittent Design: Other Designs
1st Mandrel/Valve...................................
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 110/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 110
• Depth of 1st Valve is the same for most designs• Strictly a U-tube case where the outlet and inlet
pressures are nearly balanced
• Outlet Po. = Pwh+Depth(1)*[Liquid Grad (Gs)]Inlet Pi. = Pg + Gg * Depth(1) -Psf
• Example: Pwh = 100 psig,Gs= .465 psi/ft, Pg = 1000 psig,
• Gg = .03 psi/ft, Psf = 20 psi or about 50’(min)
• 100+D(1)*.465=1000+.03*D(1)-20
• D(1) = [1000-100-20]/[.465-.03] = 2023 ft
.
Injection Gas GradientForTs=75'F&Tf=175'F
API GL ManualPage 44 Fig. 4.7
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 111/200
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 150
00.01
0.02
0.030.04
0.05
0.060.07
0.08
0.090.1
Pg, Surface Gas Injection Pressure, psig
G a s G r a d i e n t , p s
i / f t SGg 0.6
SGg 0.7
SGg 0.8
SGg 0.9
For Ts= 75 F & Tf = 175 F
x
Pgd=Pg x e(0.1875xGxD/(TaxZ)
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
26002800
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 112/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 112
0200400600800
10001200140016001800200022002400
2600
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
P R E S S U
R E
( p s i )
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
Gs = 0.465
Gg = 0.03Pio
Pwh
Gf = 0.1
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 113/200
Tgs Twh
Psep
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 114/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 114
SGiTgs Twh
InjectionPressureValve
Worksheet
Constant Rate Design:for Injection Pressure Operated Valve with good well data
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 115/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 115
j p g
• Draw Gas Injection Pressure Line (Pgd) & Grad.• Find location of 1st Valve
• Select desired rate
• Select two points (Dw1 & Dw2) from gradientcurve for desired rate. Plot gradient curve for
desired rate on graph paper.• Use unloading gradient to find intersection with
Pgd. Move back up-hole to achieve necessary PD.
• This is depth of 2nd Valve.
• Repeat until Dw is reached or min space
Constant Rate Design Problem• Pg = 1200 psig; SGg = 65; Gg = 0 033 psi/ft
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 116/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 116
• Pg = 1200 psig; SGg = .65; Gg = 0.033 psi/ft
• Gs = 0.465 psi/ft; Pwh = 100 psig; Psep = 50 psi;Dw=8000’• Max rate = 600 bpd; Cut 50 %; 35 API;
• Tgs = 75 ‘F; Twh = 100 ‘F; Tf = 180 ‘F (650 psi @ 4000’)
• Tbg = 1.995” ID; GLR = 1000; (1300 psi @ 8000’ )
• Min Space = 500’; PD = 20 psi
• Solution: Use program or gradient curves to find pressures @depth for desired rate. Draw Ppd(1)…Ppd(n)
• Find 1st Valve @ about 2600’ w/ Ppd(1) = 445 psig• Extend .465 psi/ft gradient to Pgd. Move back up-hole until
a 20 psi PD results. D(2) = about 4450’
• Continue until 500’ min spacing reached.• Find operating valve
AGL_SPAC: GASLIFT SPACIN
1500
1464Constant Rate Design
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 117/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 117
0
500
1000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH(ft) or (meters)
P R E S S U R
E
s i
GASINJ TBG SPACING
1200
x
x
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 118/200
A. Mandrel Spacing: Constant Rate
for injection pressure valves
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 119/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 119
for injection pressure valves
• Given: Pwh=Psep =100 psig; Pg = 1400 psig
• Gs = 0.465 psi/ft; Twh = 120 F’; Tf=200 ‘F• SGi = 0.7; Dw= 10000’; Dmin = 500’
• PD = 25 psi; Tubing = 3.5” OD• Max rate = 2000 bpd @ max depth
• Total Rgl = 1000 CF/B• Space mandrels & find max injection depth
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 120/200
P d( )C t t R t P bl AWELLNAME
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 121/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 121
00.000200#N/A0.0184010000Dw
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A12
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A11
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A10
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A9
16261184#N/A13070.75020016121225182899508
16321210#N/A13200.75419616261250172095007
1634123557313310.76019216371275160390006
16371259118913420.76518816471300149085005
16371283152013520.77118416561325137479734
16101301180613510.78317616421350116469653
15501313189413350.8031631600137585353312
14551323183413020.8351441526140047229801
--120140014001000
----------------------------------------------------------------(INPUT)
psipsimscfdpsi-'Fpsipsipsift
@ depthSurf closeINJ GAST-RTEMP@ VALVEV openSURFTBG PRESDEPTHNO.V closePvc(n)QgiPvo(n)CTTvPiod(n)Pio(n)Ppd(n)D(n)
Pvcd(n)Constant Rate Problem ANAME:
S.O.DD
Variable Gradient Designfor limited data
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 122/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 122
for limited data• Draw Gas Injection Pressure Line (Pgd)
• Draw Upper Design Line (UDL) {Pgd-Pwh}
• Find location of 1st valve @ D(1). (Same approach)• Calculate Pseudo Tbg Pressure@ surface:
Ps = Pwh + 0.2 *(Pg-Pwh)
• Find Ppd(n) at total depth or total injection depth:Note: (Ppd(n) < Pgd-200 psi)
• Connect these two points: Lower Design Line (LDL)
• Find intersection of LDL @ D(1): Extend usingunloading gradient to intersection w/ Pig (UDL). Nopressure adjustment necessary. Locate D(2)
• Continue spacing until Dw reached or Min Space
Variable Rate Design Problem• Pg = 1200 psig; SGg = .65; Gg = 0.033 psi/ft
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 123/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 123
Pg 1200 psig; SGg .65; Gg 0.033 psi/ft
• Gs = 0.465 psi/ft; Pwh = 100 psig; Psep = 50 psi;Dw=8000’• Rate = 200-600 bpd; Cut 50 %; 35 ‘API
• Tgs = 75 ‘F; Twh = 100 ‘F; Tf = 180 ‘F
• Tbg = 1.995” ID; GLR = 1000;
• Min Space = 500’
• Calculate Pseudo Tbg Pressure@ surface:Ps = Pwh + 0.2 *(Pg-Pwh)= 100 + 0.2 (1200-100) = 320 psig
• Find Ppd(n) at total depth or total injection depth:• Ppd(n) = 1200 + .033x8000 -200 =1264 psig @ 8000’ [max]
• Connect these two points: Lower Design Line (LDL)
• Find D(1) {Same approach as before}• Find intersection of LDL...Ppd(1) @ D(1): Extend using unloading
gradient to intersection w/ Pig (UDL). Locate D(2), D(3)….D(n)
• Continue spacing until Dw reached or Min Space
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
1500 Bellows Injection Pressure Operated Valves
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 124/200
0
500
1000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
P R E S S U
R E
( p s i )
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
Variable RateInjection Pressure Valves
320
1264
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
1500 Spring Production Pressure Operated Valves
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 125/200
0
500
1000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
P R E S S U R E
( p s i )
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
Variable RateProducing Pressure (Fluid) Valves
Intermittent Design
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 126/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 126
• Draw Gas Injection Pressure Line, Pgd:UDL• Find location of 1st Valve.
• Select design rate -Use small ported unloading valves
• Find Int. Spacing Factor (Fs):API GLM - Page 106, Fig 8-4
• Pdp(n) =Fs*Dw+Pwh; Connect Pwh & Pdp(n): LDL
• From intersection of LDL & D(1) extend unloadinggradient (Sg) to UDL. Move back up-hole until the PD isreached. This is location of D(2). Find D(3)...
• Continue same procedure until Dw reached.• Select large ported or pilot operating valve
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 127/200
Intermittent Gas LiftSpacing Factors
Fig. 8.4
Intermittent Gas Lift
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 128/200
0 100 200 300 400 500
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
Rate in BPD
S p a
c i n g F a c t o r ( S F ) i n
p s i / f t
1.61"ID
1.995"ID2.441"ID
2.992"ID
p g
o
oo
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
Intermittent Lift Spacing
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 129/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 129
0100200300400
500600700800900
100011001200130014001500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
P
R E S S U R E ( p s i )
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
Spacing Factor = .1
1192
100 +8000x.1
Mandrel Spacing Summary
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 130/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 130
Mandrel Spacing Summary• You have learned methods for
spacing valves:• (2)Constant Rate for Injection Pressure Valves;
(3) Variable Gradient for Inj. & Prod. Pressure Valves;(4) Intermittent design for Inj. Pressure Valves.
• Good spacing is essential for goodoperation & being able to work down
to the lowest possible valve
• Plan ahead for changing conditions.
B. Mandrel Spacing: Variable
Gradient for injection pressure operated Valves
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 131/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 131
Gradient for injection pressure operated Valves
Given: Psep = 100 psig; Pg = 1400 psig
Gs = 0.465 psi/ft; Twh = 100 ‘F; Tf=160 ‘FSGi = 0.65; Dw= 7000’; Dmin = 500’
PD = 25 psi; Tubing = 3.5” ODRate ? = 1500+ bpd from 7000’+
Total Rgl = 750 CF/BCalculate Pseudo Tubing Pressure
Space mandrels & find max injection depth
C. Mandrel Spacing: Intermittent Gas Liftfor injection pressure valves
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 132/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 132
. for injection pressure valves
Given: Psep= 50 psig; Pwh = 50 psig; Pg = 800 psig
Gs = 0.465 psi/ft; Tgs=75’F;Twh =100‘F; Tf=150‘F
SGi = 0.70; Dw= 7,000’ ; Gg = 0.024 psi/ft
PD = 25 psi; Tubing = 2.875” OD
Rate = 200 bpd from 7,000’
Use intermittent lift spacing factors for LDL (.055)
Space mandrels
Equilibrium Curve• Definition: A curve that connects the intersection of the
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 133/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 133
Definition: A curve that connects the intersection of the
natural flowing gradients with the gas lift producinggradients.
• Draw graph of Pressure Vs Depths. Plot upper flowing
gradient curves for selected rates for GL conditions.
• Find from PI or IPR various Pwf’s for different rates
at total depth.• Draw the lower gradient curves and find the
intersection with the appropriate upper gradient curve
• Maximum production rate will be about 200 psi less
than the gas injection pressure.
GasLiftManual
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 134/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 134
Gf 0.42 psi/ft
120 ‘F
Manual
Upper Gradient Curves (Trace)
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 135/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 135
PrPwf
o
E.C.
pp ( )
Lower Gradient Curves
(0.42 psi/ft above BP)200
200 bpd200 bpd
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 136/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 136
E.C.
After Jack Blann
Equilibrium Curve Problem
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 137/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 137
• Find the rate and the lift depth for the followingplanned gas lift well:
• Well Depth = 10,000’; Tubing size = 3.5” OD
• Gas Injection Pressure = 1400 psig; Pwh = 100 psig
• Temp @ Surface = 75 F’; BH Temp = 200 F’
• Pr= 3000 psig; Pb = 500 psig• PI = 2.0
• Lower flowing gradient = 0.42 psi/ft (if Pwf > Pb)
• Planned GLR = 1000 during gas lift
GAS LIFT GRADIENT CURVES
FOR 2.992" ID TUBING & 1000 GLR2500
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 138/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 138
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
DEPTH (FEET)
F L O W I N G
T B G
P R
E S S U R E
( P S I G )
AGL_DSN: EQUILIBRIUM PROGRAM
3000
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 139/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 139
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
P R E S S U R E ( p s i ) o r ( b a r )
NEEDED INJ PRESSURE GASINJ PRESSURE INJ GAS-SF
5. Continuous Flow Problems
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 140/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 140
API RP 11V6• 5.1 Example Problem No. 1
• 5.2 Example Problem No. 2• 5.3 Example Problem No. 3
5. API RP 11V6: Injection PressureOperated Valves:Example Problem No. 1:
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 141/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 141
Typical Well with Good Data• Pwh = 100 psig
• Pg = 1250-1200 psig
• Ts = 78 ‘F
• Twh = 108 ‘F
• Tf = 178 ‘F• Gs = 0.465 psi/ft
• Dw = 8000 ft.
• Pgd at Dw = 1440 psig• Water Cut 50%
• Pr = PB* = 2125 psig
• Rgo = 700 & Rgl = 350
• Psp = 75 psig
• Sgi = 0.6 (.65)
• Pl1 = 400 psig @ 2500’
• Pl2 = 880 psig @ 6000’• PD = 25 psig
• Dmin = 250’
• Tbg. = 2.441” ID• Valve = 1” w/3/16” port
• Rate = 200 BPD @ 1941 psig
IPR_VOG: VOGEL OIL WELL IPR
2500
API RP 11V6: Example # 1
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 142/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 142
0
500
1000
1500
2000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
PRODUCTION RATE (BPD) OR (M^3/D)
P W F ; F L O W I N G P R E S S U R E ( P S I A ) O R ( k P a )
NO SKIN WITH SKIN
p
PI = 1000/1000 =1.0
1941 psig
1125 psi
Pr=2125 psig
Qmax = 1325
or NOpsipsiftpsi/ftftpsibfpd
OKPgdPRES.DEPTHGFALEVELPwf RATE
RemarksCSGTBGINJ.FLUID
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 143/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 143
14428000
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A0.1455730953100010
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A0.139534311169009
OK1431110876340.132499712618008
OK141298070150.126468113947007
OK139586864550.119438815176006
OK138076959450.113411516325005
OK136668154770.106385717404004
OK135360250450.100361218433003
OK134053246450.093337919412002
OK132947042730.087315520351001
120010000.080000
---------------------------------------------------------
AGL_DSN: EQUILIBRIUM PROGRAM
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
P R E S S U R E ( p s
i ) o r
( b a r )
NEEDED INJ PRESSURE GAS INJ PRESSURE INJ GAS-SF
Optimum Injection Gas
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 144/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 144
• Use the available injection gas to make themost oil production and greatest profit
• Split the gas between wells to achieve suchresults
• However; installation of additionalcompressors to achieve max rate seldom
justified! {Parkinson’s Gas Law}• Experience: Maximum profit @ about 50% of
max injection to achieve max rate
2500P S I G
Gas Lift PerformanceFor 2.992"Tbg & 2000 BPD
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 145/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 145
.
0 1 2 3 4 5
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Thousands
Total Gas (Formation+Injection) in MCFD
P t
: T u b i n g P r e s s u r e @
5 0 0 0 f t i n
Excessive GasOpti-mum
Gas@ 5000’
Max Rate
Excessive Gas
InsufficientGas
MMCFD
Typical
AGL_GRAD: GAS LIFT GRADIENT CURVESEXAMPLE FOR 1000 BPD UP 2.875" OD TUBING
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 146/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 146
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Thousands
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
P R E S S U R E ( p s
i ) o r ( b a r )
GLR=250(44.5) 500(89) 750(134)
1000(178) 1250(223) 1500(267)
0
1000
BOPDTYPICAL CASE
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 147/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 147
Gas Injection Rate in MCFD
Max Oil Rate
Max OCI
Max Profit
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 148/200
5.1.6 Injection Gas Required @ Depth
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 149/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 149
• For a production rate of 800 BFPD
For a Rgl of : (Correction Factor @ 178 ‘F & Gg of .65 = 1.11)
1500: (1500x800 – 350x800)/1000 = 920 x1.11= 1021 MCFD
1200: (1200x800 - 350x800)/1000 = 680 x1.11= 755 MCFD
1000: (1000x800 – 350x800)/1000 = 520 x1.11=577 MCFD
800: (800x800 – 350x800)/1000 = 360 x1.11=400 MCFD
AGL_TEMP: FLOWING TEMPERATURE PROFILE
3005.1.7 Temperature
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 150/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 150
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 1000
0
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
T E M P E R
A T U R E ' F
o f ' C
STATIC TEMP FLOW TEMP
Tf=178 ‘F
Ts = 78 ‘F
Twh= 108 ‘F
.
Injection Gas GradientFor Ts= 75 'F & Tf = 175 'F
API GL ManualPage 44 Fig. 4.7
5.1.8 Gas Gradient
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 151/200
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 150
0
0.01
0.02
0.030.04
0.05
0.060.07
0.08
0.090.1
Pg, Surface Gas Injection Pressure, psig
G a s G
r a d i e n t , p s i / f t SGg 0.6
SGg 0.7
SGg 0.8
SGg 0.9
Pgd=Pg x e(0.1875xGxD/(TaxZ)
oo
5.1.10 Valve Setting Depths
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 152/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 152
• First Valve Setting Depth
• Tubing pressure = casing pressure – Psf
• Max unloading flowing pressure = .gas injection pressure- Psf
• Pwh + gs x D(1) = Pg + gg x D(1) – Psf
• 100+0.465 x D(1)= 1200+ .03xD(1) -20
• (.465-.03)xD(1) = 1200-100-20=1080
• D(1) = 1080/.435 = 2483 ft• Adjusted D(1) = 2475 ft (close as you can read chart)
0.465
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 153/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 153
0.42
2325x
o
o
.
5.1.12 Subsequent Valve Setting Depths
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 154/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 154
• Ppd(n)+gsxDbv=(pg-nxPD)+ ggx(D(n)+Dbv-Psf
• For valve(2)
• 400+.465xDbv=(Pg-25)+.03x(2483+Dvb)-20
• Dbv =1907 ft
• D(2) = 2483+1907 = 4390 ft about 4375 ft
• D(3) = 5797 about 5800 ft (as close as can read chart)
• D(4) = 6783 about 6775 ft
• D(5) = 7434 about 7425 ft• D(6) = 7820 Adjustment to 7690 ft (half-way between D(5) & D(7)
• D(7) = 8000+ Adjustment to 7940 ft (30 ft above packer)
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 155/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 155
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 156/200
5.1.14 Valve Selection
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 157/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 157
• In this case, one-inch, unbalanced,
nitrogen-charged bellows valves without a
spring was selected. (A common practice
in some areas.)
Piod
Ppd
Pb
Port Size = ?
PPEF = ?
755 Thornhill-Craver Equation
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 158/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 158
I” Inj. Pressure w/ 12/64” port
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 159/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 159
2475’ 130 .104 400 42 1275 1317 .869 1144
WELL NAME: API RP 11V6: Example # 1
Summary: Table 2 – Test Rack Pressure Calculation--Modified
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 160/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 160
D(n) Ppd(n) Pio(n) Piod(n) Tv CT Pvo(n) QgiNO. DEPTH TBG PRES SURF V open @ VALVE TEMP T-R INJ GAS
ft psi psi psi 'F - psi mscfd
(INPUT) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 0 100 1200 1200 108 - -
1 2475 397 1200 1273 130 0.863 1134 931
2 4375 648 1175 1302 146 0.835 1143 9403 5800 851 1150 1315 159 0.815 1145 919
4 6775 996 1125 1315 167 0.803 1138 832
5 7425 1095 1100 1304 173 0.795 1126 709
6 7690 1137 1075 1282 175 0.792 1108 604
7 7940 1176 1050 1258 177 0.789 1089 46514/64” SO
5.1.16 Summary for Example Problem No. 1
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 161/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 161
• Predicted rate of about 800 BFPD
• Lift from Screened Orifice near bottom
• Gas injection rate of about 680(755) MCFD
• Flowing surface temperature of about 108 “F
• Anticipated operating surface gas injection of 1075 psig
• After installation, production tests should be run to optimize
production and injection gas rates.
.
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 162/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 162
• .
*•*max=7100x.465=
3300 psig
160
**Pi from 0.1 to 1.0 bpd/psi
Min PI = 0.1
Av. PI = 0.4Max PI = 1.0
Note: 2 3/8 inch tbg
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 163/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 163
API Example 2: Assume PI = 0.1 bpd/psi
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 164/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 164
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A0.10052477782504
OK102858854050.094400513002003
OK99041538010.088281418001502
OK95326522540.082162423001001
9008000.070000
---------------------------------------------------------
or NOpsipsiftpsi/ftftpsibfpd
OKPgdPRES.DEPTHGFALEVELPwf RATE
RemarksCSGTBGINJ.FLUID
7000 700 1060
RemarksCSGTBGINJ.FLUID
API Example 2: Assume PI = 200/500=0.4 bpd/psi & Pr = 3300 psi
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 165/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 165
NO1064123269370.166400513008007
NO103595556840.154341015507006
OK100872545400.142281418006005
OK98353434900.130221920505004
OK96037825230.118162423004003
OK93925316310.106102925503002
OK9191568040.09443328002001
9008000.070000
---------------------------------------------------------
or NOpsipsiftpsi/ftftpsibfpd
OKPgdPRES.DEPTHGFALEVELPwf RATE
or NOpsipsiftpsi/ftftpsibfpd
OKPgdPRES.DEPTHGFALEVELPwf RATE
RemarksCSGTBGINJ.FLUIDAPI Example 2: PI = 1 bpd/psi
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 166/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 166
10687100
NO1011107946700.21421002100120010
OK99487939540.2021862220011009
OK97970933130.1901624230010008
OK96556727360.178138624009007
OK95244722130.166114825008006
OK94134717370.15491026007005
OK93126513020.14267127006004
OK9211979030.13043328005003
OK9131435360.11819529004002
OK9051011970.106030003001
9008000.070000
---------------------------------------------------------
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING
1500
API Example 2: Variable Gradient Design
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 167/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 167
0
500
1000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
P R E
S S U R E
( p s
i ) o r ( b a r )
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
Pg= 900 psi
1060
860
Pwh’= 160+.2x(900-160)=308 psi
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 168/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 168
Pwh= .2x(900-160)+160
Min. Spacing = 200 ft
1060860
WELL
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 169/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 169
853687#N/A7110.8021738537208667000
8547113587220.81316585774078060478727344297390.8151638767607625847
8897564897550.8181618947807425610
9037785437710.8221599108007135281
9147995897860.8271559238206764846
9228206287990.8341519348406304290
9268416548110.8421459408605743599
9268616658210.8531389438805072757
9218806688300.8671309409004321753
--1159009003080
----------------------------------------------------------------(INPUT)
psipsimscfdpsi-'Fpsipsipsift
@ depthSurf closeINJ GAST-RTEMP@ VALVEV openSURFTBG PRESDEPTH
V closePvc(n)QgiPvo(n)CTTvPiod(n)Pio(n)Ppd(n)D(n)
Pvcd(n)Example #2NAME:
DummyDummy
¼” s. orifice
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 170/200
A.Summary: Problem # 2
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 171/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 171
• The design results are for Injection PressureOperated Valves.
• This spacing is too wide for ProductionPressure Operated (PPO) Valves.
• For PPO Valves, the top of the design line
should be based on 30 or 40% of thedifference between Pio1 and Pwh.
• The resulting closer spacing permits the
uppermost PPO Valves to close as unloadingprogresses deeper in the well.
B.Summary: Problem # 2
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 172/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 172
• Original mandrel spacing for new wellsmust be carefully thought out.
• When little or no well productivity infois available, mandrel spacing should be
closer, mainly in the upper part of thestring.
• Mandrel spacing must be sufficient tolast for the lifetime of the completion.
C.Summary: Problem # 2
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 173/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 173
• Flexible design from 250 to 1100 BFPD
• Minimum of 10 mandrels• “Valve” to lift from near total depth
• Drop injection pressure 20 psi on eachlower valve to deter multi-point injection
• Use ¼-inch screened orifice on bottom
API RP 11V6: 5.3 Example No. 3 - Fixed MandrelUsing Injection Pressure Operated Valves
P P 3350 i G 0 465 i/f
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 174/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 174
• Pr = Pws = 3350 psig• Pb = 1500; (Standing)
• Test Rate = 200 BFPD
• Pwh = 120 psig• API Oil = 35o; GOR = 400
• Cut = 50 %:Water
SG=1.074• Tbg = 1.995” ID
• Dw=8000’TVD/9936’MD
• Pwf = 2550 psig (Fig 21)
• Ts = 74 ‘F
• Tf = 180 ‘F
• Gs = 0.465 psi/ft• Pg = 1150 to 1250 psig
• Sgi = 0.7
• Mandrel = Oval Side Pocket• Min Spacing = 500’
• PD= 20 psig
• GL Valve = 1” w/ 3/16” port• Casing = &’ OD
• Directional Well
• Gg = 0.032• Twh = Measured: 100 ‘F
• Use all known information
5.3.2 Well Data
P P (D th SFL) P h
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 175/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 175
• Pr = Pws = gsx(Depth-SFL) + Pwh• Pws = 0.465 x (8000 – 900*) + 50 = 3350 psig
…..from sonic fluid level measurement
• Pwf = 2550 psig from Fig. 21
• Pb = Bubble Point Using Standing’s = 1500 psia
• Gg
= 0.032 psi/ft Fig. 5
• Temp. gradient = 100x(180-100)/8000= 1 ‘F/100’
API RP 11V6Example # 3
2550 psig
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 176/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 176
GOR 400
Bubble Point
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 177/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 177
GOR = 400SGg = 0.85Oil Gr. = 35Ff = 180
BP = 1500 psia
IPR_VOG: VOGEL OIL WELL IPR
3500
4000
R ( k P a )
5.3 API Example Problem No. 3
Pws = 3350 psig
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 178/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 178
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
PRODUCTION RATE (BPD) OR (M^3/D)
P W F ; F L O
W I N G P R E S S U
R E ( P S I A ) O R
NO SKIN WITH SKIN
Pwf = 2550 psig
PI = 200/(3350-2550) = .25 bpd/psi
Qmax = 670 bpd
BP
or NOpsipsiftpsi/ftftpsibfpd
OKPgdPRES.DEPTHGFALEVELPwf RATE
RemarksCSGTBGINJ.FLUID
API 11V6 Example # 3: Equilibrium Curve Data
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 179/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 179
15018000
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A10
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A9
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A8
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A7
#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A0.14260768086006
OK1477107873700.130480313435005
OK141579657280.118383317504004
OK135956942360.106288121503003
OK130738828530.094192925502002
OK125924915680.08297629501001
120012000.070000
---------------------------------------------------------
Maximum Production Rate 0f 500+ bfpd from 7370 ft
AGL_DSN: EQUILIBRIUM PROGRAM
3500
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 180/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 180
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
P R E S S U R E
( p s
i ) o r ( b a r )
NEEDED INJ PRESSURE GAS INJ PRESSURE INJ GAS-SF
200 BPD500 BPD
Well Data: Mandrel Spacing:Well straight to 1500’ then Directional
N Dt / D
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 181/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 181
• No. Dtv / Dm• 0 0’ 0’
• 1 2350’ 2450’
• 2 3460’ 3921’• 3 4345’ 5094’
• 4 5000’ 5962’
• 5 5500’ 6624’• 6 6000’ 7287’
• 7 6500’ 7949’
• 8 7000’ 8612’• 9 7500’ 9274’
• 10 7900’ 9804’
41+ degree angle from
2450’ to total depth
Dtv TD Dm
o 1500’
*
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 182/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 182
* Fluid rate---50% cut
Gas Passage Chart
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 183/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 183
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 184/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 184
PPEF = 0.104
API RP 11V6 Example # 3
ORIGINAL
SPACING
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 185/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 185
SPACINGDESIGN
AGL_SPAC: GAS LIFT SPACING2000
API RP 11V6: Example # 3- Ideal spacing
Requires pulling tubing to re-space
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 186/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 186
0
500
1000
1500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000DEPTH (ft) or (meters)
P R E S S U R
E
( p s i )
GAS INJ TBG SPACING
500 bfpd
Requires pulling tubing to re-space
AGL_SET:INJECTION PRESSURE VALVE DESIGN
Example2000
Valve installed in each mandrel
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 187/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 187
0
500
1000
1500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DEPTH (ft) of (meters)
P R E S S U R E ( p
s i ) o r ( b a r )
INJ GAS TBG Temp VALVE SPACING
API RP 11V6 Example Problem No. 3
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 188/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 188
Qgi
MCFD
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 189/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 189
MCFD
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 190/200
WELL NAME: API RP 11V6: Fixed Mandrels-Example # 3
D(n) Ppd(n) Pio(n) Piod(n) Tv CT Pvo(n) Qgi
NO DEPTH TBG PRES SURF V open @ VALVE TEMP T R INJ GAS
API RP 11V6 Example # 3:Table 7 - Mandrel/Valve Summary
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 191/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 191
4345 D5500 D
D
NO. DEPTH TBG PRES SURF V open @ VALVE TEMP T-R INJ GAS
ft psi psi psi 'F - psi mscfd
(INPUT) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
0 120 1200 1200 100 - -
1 2350 406 1200 1275 124 0.873 1150 917
2 3460 562 1180 1288 135 0.854 1151 918
3 5000 800 1160 1315 150 0.829 1159 918
4 6000 968 1140 1323 160 0.813 1158 848
5 6500 1056 1120 1315 165 0.806 1148 761
6 7000 1147 1100 1307 170 0.799 1139 626
7 7500 1240 1080 1298 175 0.792 1129 393
8 7900 1317 1060 1286 179 0.786 1118 #N/A
1/4” SODummy
4345 D5500 D
D
Summary Example Problem No. 3
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 192/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 192
• Calculated a PI = 0.25 bfpd
• Used Equilibrium Curve to predict a rate of 500+ bfpd
from about 7500 ft.• Spaced valves using TVD
• Recommended valves @ 2350, 3460, 5000, 6000,6500 & 7000 ft with dummies @ 4345, 5500 & 7900 ftplus a 14/64 inch screened orifice @ 7500 ft to pass500 MCFD
Summary for Design
• The better the data the more specific the design
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 193/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 193
• The better the data, the more specific the design.• The poorer the data, the more flexible the design.
• If feasible, design to lift from near bottom.• Carefully select the tubing size.
• For better valve performance, use 1 ½-inch valves.
Select the smallest port that will pass the requiredinjection gas.
• For most wells, use a screened orifice as the bottom
injection “valve.”
Impact of Significant Variables
• INJECTION PRESSURE: The higher the injection gas pressure, theid th d l i d th d th i lift d th
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 194/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 194
INJECTION PRESSURE: The higher the injection gas pressure, thewider the mandrel spacing and the deeper the maximum lift depthcan be.
• FLOWING WELLHEAD TUBINE PRESSURE: The higher the
pressure, the lower the maximum producing rate and the higherthe injection gas requirement will be.
• TUBING SIZE: Larger tubing sizes permit higher producing ratesand wider mandrel spacing.
• UNLOADING GRADIENTS: Higher gradients mean closer mandrelspacing and shallower maximum lift depths.
• INJECTION GAS GRAVITY: Higher gas gravity means wider
mandrel spacing and higher test rack opening pressures for gaslift valves.
• CLOSER MANDREL SPACING: Permits near optimum gas liftperformance and unloading the well with less injection gas
volume.
DESIGN PRINCIPLES
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 195/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 195
• CLOSER MANDREL SPACING IS
PREFERRED.
• HIGHER PRODUCTIVITY WELLS
REQUIRE CLOSER MANDREL SPACING
NEAR TOP OF WELL.• MANDREL SPACING SHOULD BE
BASED ON WELL LIFE CYCLEESPECIALLY OFFSHORE.
GOOD GAS-LIFT PRACTICES
• Streamlined Wellhead
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 196/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 196
• Streamlined Wellhead
• Flowline Size• Separator Pressure
• Well Conditioningf/Unloading
• Unloading Precautions
UNLOADING PRECAUTIONS
• Don’t Cut Out the Valves!
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 197/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 197
• Don t Cut Out the Valves!• Buildup Injection Pressure Slowly
• 5 psi/min. to 400 psi• 10 psi/min. Until Gas Production
• Then increase Gas Injection Rateto the Desired Value
Preferences
SINGLE COMPLETIONS PREFERRED OVERDUALS
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 198/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 198……………….GasLift Workshop - Smith & Clegg 2/3/2006 Page 82
DUALS.
LARGER OD (1.5”) GAS LIFT VALVES PERMITSMALLER INJECTION PRESSURE DROPS FORCONTINUOUS FLOW IN SMALLER PORT SIZES.
MANDRELS W/ORIENTING SLEEVES BETTERFOR HIGHLY DEVIATED WELLS.
RuleOfThumb: FLOWLINE SIZE SHOULD BE ONESTANDARD SIZE LARGER THAN TUBING SIZE.
STREAMLINING WELLHEADS REDUCESFLOWING WELLHEAD BACKPRESSURE &INJECTION GAS REQUIREMENT.
Summary
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 199/200
2007 Workshop Clegg & Smith 199
• You have learned to do a complete gas liftdesign using an equilibrium curve to determine
the max rate, various graphical methods forspacing, and how to calculate the test rackpressures for injection pressure operatedvalves.
• You how know more than most people about
gas lift---hopefully!
This is to certify that
8/13/2019 Gs Lift Design Oourse
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gs-lift-design-oourse 200/200
________________
Completed the
API Gas-Lift
Design Course
id mith