+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD,...

Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD,...

Date post: 17-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: denis-greer
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
65
Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational Health and Safety; Professor of Medicine and Director, Statewide Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Transcript
Page 1: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice

Based on CDC EvidenceWilliam A. Rutala, PhD, MPH

Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational Health and Safety; Professor of Medicine and

Director, Statewide Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology; University of North Carolina at

Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Page 2: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process

Steam Sterilization: Advantages and disadvantages Functional workflow Cleaning and decontamination Preparation and Packaging Monitoring

Page 3: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Disinfection and SterilizationRutala , Weber. www.cdc.gov

EH Spaulding believed that how an object will be disinfected depended on the object’s intended use.

CRITICAL - objects which enter normally sterile tissue or the vascular system or through which blood flows should be sterile.

SEMICRITICAL - objects that touch mucous membranes or skin that is not intact require a disinfection process (high-level disinfection [HLD]) that kills all microorganisms but high numbers of bacterial spores.

NONCRITICAL -objects that touch only intact skin require low-level disinfection .

Page 4: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Processing “Critical” Patient Care ObjectsClassification: Critical objects enter normally sterile tissue or

vascular system, or through which blood flows.

Object: Sterility.Level germicidal action: Kill all microorganisms, including bacterial

spores.Examples: Surgical instruments and devices; cardiac

catheters; implants; etc.Method: Steam, gas, hydrogen peroxide gas plasma,

vaporized hydrogen peroxide, ozone or chemical sterilization.

Page 5: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Sterilization of “Critical Objects”

Steam sterilizationHydrogen peroxide gas plasma

Ethylene oxideVaporized hydrogen peroxide

Page 6: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process

Steam Sterilization: Advantages and disadvantages Functional workflow Cleaning and decontamination Preparation and Packaging Monitoring

Page 7: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Steam Sterilization Advantages

Non-toxic Cycle easy to control and monitor Inexpensive Rapidly microbicidal Least affected by organic/inorganic soils Rapid cycle time Penetrates medical packing, device lumens

Disadvantages Deleterious for heat labile instruments Potential for burns

Page 8: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Minimum Steam Sterilization Times Time at 132oC in Prevacuum Sterilizer

Item Minimum exposure Minimum drying time

Wrapped instruments 4 min 30 min

Textile packs 4 min 5 min

Page 9: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Steam Sterilization

• Saturated steam is used to sterilize 80-85% of reusable medical devices in healthcare facilities.

“Steam is the preferred method for sterilizing critical medical and surgical instruments that are not damaged by heat, steam, pressure, or moisture.”*

*Rutala, Weber. CDC Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008

Page 10: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process

Steam Sterilization: Advantages and disadvantages Functional workflow Cleaning and decontamination Preparation and Packaging Monitoring

Page 11: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Central ProcessingPhysical Facilities

Facility ideally divided into three areas: Decontamination-reusable items are received, sorted, and

decontaminated; negative pressure; 6AC/hr. Personnel wear gloves when handling contaminated instruments; face masks, eye protection, and gowns/aprons when splashing may occur.

Packaging-used for inspecting, assembling, and packaging clean, but not sterile, material.

Sterilization and storage-limited access area with a controlled temperature and relative humidity.

Page 12: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Staging/Preparation

Page 13: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Preparation

Page 14: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Sterilization

Page 15: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Storage of Sterile Surgical Instruments

Page 16: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process

Steam Sterilization: Advantages and disadvantages Functional workflow Cleaning and decontamination Preparation and Packaging Monitoring

Page 17: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Cleaning Mechanical cleaning machines-automated equipment may

increase productivity, improve cleaning effectiveness, and decrease worker exposure Utensil washer-sanitizer Ultrasonic cleaner Washer sterilizer Dishwasher Washer disinfector

Manual

Page 18: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Cleaning Items must be cleaned using water with detergents or

enzymatic cleaners before processing. Cleaning reduces the bioburden and removes foreign

material (organic residue and inorganic salts) that interferes with the sterilization process.

Cleaning and decontamination should be done as soon as possible after the items have been used as soiled materials become dried onto the instruments.

Page 19: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Cleaning Purpose: remove all adherent debris from an item and to

reduce the number of particulates, microorganisms, and pyrogens. Removes debris such as blood, mucus, oil, salts or other

foreign matter interferes with the sterilization process Reduces the bioburden and enhances the probability of

sterilization

Page 20: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Bioburden on Surgical Devices Bioburden on instruments used in surgery (Nystrom, 1981)

62% contaminated with <101

82% contaminated with <102

91% contaminated with <103

Bioburden on surgical instruments (Rutala, 1997) 72% contained <101

86% contained <102

Bioburden on surgical instruments (50)submitted to CP (Rutala, 2014) 58% contained <10 20% contained < 102

16% contained <5x102

6% contained <103

Page 21: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Washer/DisinfectorRutala WA, Gergen MF, Weber DJ, ICHE. In press

Five Chambers Pre-wash: water/enzymatic is circulated over the load for 1 min Wash: detergent wash solution (150oF) is sprayed over load for 4 min Ultrasonic cleaning: basket is lowered into ultrasonic cleaning tank

with detergent for 4 min Thermal and lubricant rinse: hot water (180oF) is sprayed over load

for 1 min; instrument milk lubricant is added to the water and is sprayed over the load

Drying: blower starts for 4 min and temperature in drying chamber 180F

Page 22: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Washer/DisinfectorRemoval/Inactivation of Inoculum (Exposed) on Instruments

WD Conditions Organism Inoculum Log Reduction Positives

Routine MRSA 2.6x107 Complete 0/8

Routine VRE 2.6x107 Complete 0/8

Routine P aeruginosa 2.1x107 Complete 0/8

Routine M terrae 1.4x108 7.8 2/8

Routine GS spores 5.3x106 4.8 11/14

No Enz/Det VRE 2.5x107 Complete 0/10

No Enz/Det GS spores 8.3x106 5.5 8/10

Page 23: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Washer/disinfectors are very effective (>5 log10 reduction) in removing/inactivating

microorganisms from instruments

Page 24: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

IS THERE A STANDARD TO DEFINE WHEN A DEVICE IS CLEAN?

There is currently no standard to define when a device is “clean”, cleanliness controlled by visual

Potential methods: level of detectable bacteria; protein (6µg/cm2); endotoxin; ATP; lipid

This is due in part to the fact that no universally accepted test soils to evaluate cleaning efficiency and no standard procedure for measuring cleaning efficiency

At a minimum, a cleaning process should: reduce the natural bioburden; remove organic/inorganic contaminants; provide devices that when sterilized have a SAL 10-6

Page 25: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Cleaning Indicators for Washer Disinfector Monitor the automated

washer and instrument cleaning chemistry functionaiity

Indicator includes proteins, lipids, and polysaccharides to mimic common challenging test soils

Page 26: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process

Steam Sterilization: Advantages and disadvantages Cleaning and decontamination Functional workflow Preparation and Packaging Monitoring

Page 27: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Packaging Once items are cleaned, dried, and inspected, items are

wrapped or placed in a rigid container Arranged in tray/basket according to guidelines

Hinged instruments opened Items with removable parts should be disassembled Heavy items positioned not to damage delicate items

Several choices to maintain sterility of instruments: rigid containers, peel pouched; sterilization wraps

Page 28: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.
Page 29: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

PackagingSterilization Wraps

An effective sterilization wrap would: Allow penetration of the sterilant Provide an effective barrier to microbial penetration Maintain the sterility of the processed item after sterilization Puncture resistant and flexible Drapeable and easy to use

Multiple layers are still common practice due to the rigors of handling

Page 30: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.
Page 31: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Loading All items to be sterilized should be arranged so all

surfaces will be directly exposed to the sterilizing agent Other basic principles:

Allow for proper steam/gas circulation Nonperforated containers should be placed on their edge Peel packs should be placed on edge

Page 32: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Packaging/Load Configuration Packaging materials should be compatible with the

sterilization process Packaging (rigid containers, peel pouches, wraps) should

provide a barrier to microorganisms and moisture and should be sufficiently strong to resist punctures and tears.

Items should be placed loosely into the basket, shelf, or cart so as not to impede contact between the sterilant and the microorganism.

Page 33: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Objectives of Monitoring the Sterilization Process

Assures probability of absence of all living organisms on medical devices being processed

Detect failures as soon as possibleRemoves medical device involved in failures

before patient use

Page 34: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process

Steam Sterilization: Advantages and disadvantages Cleaning and decontamination Functional workflow Preparation and Packaging Monitoring

Page 35: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Sterilization Process Monitoring

Monitoring Tools• Physical monitors• Chemical indicators• Biological indicators• Process challenge devices (PCDs) test packs or challenge packs

Page 36: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Sterilization MonitoringSterilization monitored routinely by combination of

mechanical, chemical, and biological parameters Physical - cycle time, temperature, pressure. Monitors

one location in the sterilizer. Chemical - heat or chemical sensitive inks that change

color when germicidal-related parameters present. Identifies processed from unprocessed medical devices.

Biological - Bacillus spores that directly measure sterilization. Integrates all parameters of the process.

Page 37: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

ANSI/AAMI ST79:2010 & A1:2010 & A2:2011 & A3:2012 & A4:2013 , Section 10.5.1

Physical Monitors

• Marked with correct date and sterilizer identification at beginning of cycle• Read & verified by initialing at end of cycle• If not correct, do not release load

Page 38: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Chemical Indicators

ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11140-1:2005 /(R)2010 (Mfrs. Standard)ANSI/AAMI ST79:2010 & A1:2010 & A2:2011 & A3:2012 & A4:2013, Section 10.5.2.1

• Class 1 Process Indicators

• Class 2 Indicators for use in Specific Tests

• Class 3 Single Variable Indicators

• Class 4 Multi-variable Indicators

• Class 5 Integrating Indicators

• Class 6 Emulating Indicators

Page 39: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Class 1 Chemical Indicators

ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11140-1:2005 /(R)2010 (Mfrs. Standard)ANSI/AAMI ST79:2010 & A1:2010 & A2:2011 & A3:2012 & A4:2013, Section 10.5.2.1

Process IndicatorsUse with individual units to indicate that the unit has been directly exposed to the sterilization process • Exposure Control/External CIs• Distinguish between processed and unprocessed

units• Designed to react to one or more of the

critical process variables

Page 40: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Class 2 Chemical Indicators

Indicators for Specific Tests• Equipment Control• Testing sterilizer performance

Bowie-Dick Test monitors efficacy of air removal and steam penetration in 270-

275ºF (132-135ºC) dynamic-air removal sterilizers (i.e., vacuum-assisted sterilizers)

ANSI/AAMI ST79:2010 & A1:2010 & A2:2011 & A3:2012 & A4:2013, Section 10.5.2.1,10.7.6

Page 41: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Class 2 Chemical Indicators

ANSI/AAMI ST79:2010 & A1:2010 & A2:2011 & A3:2012 & A4:2013 , Section 10.7.6

Bowie-Dick tests can detect: • Air leaks• Inadequate air removal• Inadequate steam penetration• Presence of non-condensable gases: air or gases from boiler additives

•Used for routine daily testing and qualification testing

Page 42: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

ANSI/AAMI ST79:2010 & A1:2010 & A2:2011 & A3:2012 & A4:2013, Sections 10.7.6.5 and 10.8.1

• Uniform color change • If not uniform, shut down and report to

supervisor• Remain in use• Retest• Call for repair

• Re-qualify if major repair

Class 2 Chemical Indicators Bowie-Dick Test

Page 43: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Class 5 Chemical Indicators

Integrating Indicators (Internal CIs, Load Control)• Designed to react to all critical variables • Stated values equivalent to the performance requirements for BIs (ISO 11138

series)

ANSI/AAMI ST79:2010 & A1:2010 & A2:2011 & A3:2012 & A4:2013, Section 10.5.2.1

Page 44: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.
Page 45: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Monitoring of Sterilizers Use physical, chemical and biological monitors to ensure

the effectiveness of the sterilization process Each load should be monitored with physical and chemical

indicators. If the physical, chemical or biological indicators suggest inadequate processing, the items should not be used

Biological indicators should be used at least weekly (in CP at least daily, sometimes every load) with spores intended specifically for the type of sterilizer

Page 46: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Monitoring of Sterilizers

Internal Chemical IndicatorValidates the sterilant penetrated the pack or trayAdvantage of the pack control monitor is that it is

inside each pack in multiple locationsDetect local problem

Page 47: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.
Page 48: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Biological Monitors Steam - Bacillus stearothermophilus Dry heat - B. subtilis ETO - B. subtilis New low temperature sterilization technologies

Plasma sterilization (Sterrad) - B. stearothermophilus

Peracetic acid - B. stearothermophilus

Page 49: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Process Challenge Device (PCD)

“A PCD is a device used to assess the effective performance of a sterilization process by providing a challenge to the process that is equal or greater than the challenge posed by the most difficult item routinely processed.”

•PCD may be:

• User-assembled test pack

• Commercially available, FDA cleared preassembled test pack

•ST41 describes two types of PCDs

• Routine BI test pack

• Challenge BI test pack

Page 50: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.
Page 51: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Rapid Readout BIs for Steam Now Require a 1-3h Readout Compared to 24-48h

Page 52: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Super Rapid Readout Biological IndicatorsCommercially available in early 2013

1491 BI (blue cap)• Monitors 270°F and 275°F gravity –displacement steam sterilization cycles• 30 minute result (from 1 hour)

1492V BI (brown cap)• Monitors 270°F and 275°F dynamic-air-removal (pre-vacuum) steam sterilization cycles• 1 hour result (from 3 hours)

Page 53: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.
Page 54: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

RecommendationsMonitoring of Sterilizers

Following a single positive biological indicator used with a method other than steam, treat as non-sterile all items that have been processed in that sterilizer, dating back to last negative biological indicator. These non-sterile items should be retrieved, if possible, and reprocessed.

Page 55: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.
Page 56: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Storage Time-related shelf life-safe storage times for sterile packs

vary with the porosity of the wrapper and storage conditions (e.g., 1 year, plastic wrapped pack)

Event-related shelf life-product remains sterile until some event causes the item to become contaminated (e.g., tear in packaging, packaging become wet)

Closed or covered cabinets are ideal but open shelving may be used for storage

Page 57: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Storage of Sterile Items Event-related shelf life recognizes that the product

remains sterile until an event causes it to become contaminated (e.g., tear, wetness). Packages should be evaluated before use for lose of integrity.

Time-related shelf life (less common) considers items remain sterile for varying periods depending on the type of material used to wrap the item/tray. Once the expiration date is exceeded the pack should be reprocessed.

Page 58: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Storage of Sterile Items Sterile storage area should be well-ventilated area that

provides protection against dust, moisture, and temperature and humidity extremes.

Sterile items should be stored so that packaging is not compromised

Sterilized items should be labeled with a load number that indicates the sterilizer used, the cycle or load number, the date of sterilization, and the expiration date (if applicable)

Page 59: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Quality Control Provide comprehensive and intensive training for all staff

assigned to reprocess medical/surgical instruments To achieve and maintain competency, staff should:

hands-on training all work supervised until competency is documented competency testing should be conducted at commencement

of employment and regularly review written reprocessing instructions to ensure

compliance

Page 60: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Immediate Use Steam SterilizationIssues

Over-used…intended for immediate use only

Page 61: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Immediate Use Steam Sterilization “Flash” originally defined as sterilization of an unwrapped

object at 132oC for 3 min at 27-28 lbs pressure in gravity “Flash” used for items that must be used immediately and

cannot be packaged, sterilized and stored before use “Flash” is an antiquated term and replaced by “immediate

use steam sterilization” The same critical reprocessing steps (such as cleaning,

decontaminating, and transporting) must be followed

Page 62: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Immediate Use Steam Sterilization “Immediate Use” is defined as the shortest possible time

between a sterilized item’s removal from sterilizer and aseptic transfer to sterile field

A sterilized item intended for immediate use is not stored for future use.

Sterilization process monitoring is essential Instruments inventories should be adequate to meet

surgical volumes and permit the time to complete all critical elements of reprocessing

Page 63: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Sterilization Practices in Healthcare Facilities

Overview Physical facilities Cleaning, Packaging, Loading, Storage Monitoring

Page 64: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

Conclusions All sterilization processes effective in killing spores Cleaning removes salts and proteins and must precede

sterilization Delivery of sterile products for use in patient care

depends not only on the effectiveness of the sterilization process but also on cleaning, disassembling and packaging of the device, loading the sterilizer, and monitoring

Page 65: Guarantee of the Steam Sterilization Process: Practice Based on CDC Evidence William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational.

www.disinfectionandsterilization.org


Recommended