r
11 ) gtshy
EPA1540-FImiddot93-057 Pubfielllon 113150032
PBS13middot963402 August 1M3
GUIDANCE ON CONDUCTING NON-TIME-cRITICAL REMOVAL ACTIONS UNDER CERCLA
c
Office of Emergency and AembullcUal RHponee US lnvlronmentel Protection Agency
Wuhlngton DC 20410
r
H~iira -rt~la I- ~ bull n-~- ~ a~ bull
bull R shy~r~[ ~
fi u
ItH
J
r
No tice
The policies and procedwes 5eC rorth herein Ire intended solely IS JUidance for IOvemmcal penonncl They 1ft ncx intended nor can they be relied on to crea~e any riahu ~forceable by
~n=n~~of~~o~~~~ middot~v~~~~e~~ specific she circumstances The Aaency also reservealhe ri1ht tochanae this pidance at any time whhout public notice
c
r
Contentbull
flu 10 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1
11 The SACM Appro1ch l
11 Overview or tbe Removal Action Procw 3
l J Rolu ~=~~C~= ~~~ ~ Sta~t lnvolvernen1 8
~=~~~~~~amp~~lncV~(~sqmiddot 1 4 RtJOUrctS 9
15 Enforurnrnl aad Cost Recovery 10 PRP Search and ldcntification bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull I 0 Notict letrtts bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull I 0 PRP Nepiadon II COR Recovery bull bull bull bullbull bullbull bullbull bullbullbull bull II
l Publk lavohUMDt aad Ult Actlalltnllbulle Record bullbull bullbullbull bull11 Cornrnunicy Relations Requircrneau bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 13 AdoniniwmReeanlRcquimnoou 14
1 7 Action lflemorandum 15
1 1 Oa-Sctne Coordlulor Reporu bull bull 17
J O CONDUCTING THE ENGLIEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (Ef)IC A) It
1 1 OtMw It
1 1 EEICA Approval Met~~or~adum bullbull bullbull bullbull bull bullbull bull bullbullbull obullbull bullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ll
l o J EEICA EttcUdbulle Sumbullary bullbull o bullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbull o bullbullbull o lJ
1 4 Silt CWCttriaatioa obullbull bullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbull o bullbull o bullbull o l4 s ocripcjoo Badltpouocl 25 ltVIOUS RemltWaiAshy 26 Sowtc Nacure llld EltiCDI ofCOAlllninadon 27 Anolyucal 0 21 ~vnhncd Risk EvIUMion _ 29
c
r
J I
Contents (Continued)
1 5 ldentlncallon or Remonl ActiCNI Scope Goals and ObjtltliYQ 31
Swwory LimiiSooRemovaiActions 31 Detenninalion of Removal Scope 32 Determination or Removal Schedule bull bull bull 32
16 ldtntlncatlon 10d Aoalysls or Remoyen11 Acllon Allernallves 33 bull bullbull bull bull bull bull
Treatment Tec hnoloaics 33 Trutmcnt TechooioaY lnfonnodon Sowlta 34 Effecuveoess l 5 ~1) 40 Cool 43
1 7 Coapantln Aaalysis of Rt bullobullal Actloa AltuutJves bull bull bull bull bull 45
1 1 lltcommtadtd Rcmobullal Acliea Alamperutln bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 45
Rerereocu bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 47
Key Wonl 51
54c-- ol DICA 10 IUifS
Model Nodce ol llecloloa Nolaquo 10 UN Spedol Notke Procedures bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
-J
--
r
Esblbh liJulllw
I
2
3
4
s 6
I
J
Exhibits
~ NonmiddotTune-Criticamp Removal Action ProcesJ S
Aclion Memorandum Ou1 line 16
EfJCA OeoCIopmenlProcess 21
EEICA ApprovampJ Memorudum 22
EfJCA Oulline 23
Wonnaion From Pttvious Removal Acdons Applicbc To Cunac EEICA 27
ObjcctlvesCritcria To Be Used in eomprie Analysis fA Ahcmadva bullbullbull 36
ldcncilic ond E_ ol AlWU Durioamp NcomiddotTune-Critical Removal Aaions 31
c
-J
r
Uat of Acronymbull
AOC-Administrltive Order on Coosem
ARAIU-Appliablt or Relevant and Appropriaampe Requiremtnu
ARC5-AJtemuive Remedial Contractina Stratqy
ATSOR-Aaency for Toxic Substances and Disease ReJisuy
ATTIC-AJtenuldve Trtument Tcchnoloc lnfonnadon Center
CA-Coopcradve Apecment
CERCLA--CoheOJi Ellironmclllll Respoouc Compcasllioo and UabUily llaquot of 1980 uamcnded
CFR--Code or Federal Replllions
CLP--Coalnltt labonlofy llopam
CLU-IN--Cieanup lnr Bulktia Boon
CRP-Commuruty Rcllliofts Plan
()()()-l)eponm or or= DOE--Oeputmenc or Eaell
EEICA-E-rinc EJIIIIioogtColt Anllysis
Els-ampvuonmenul ~ s-meot
EPA-United S Enviroamcnall -ltion AaailtY
ERCS-EmerttntY ReiJIOI Cleanup Services
ERR$-EmetJltnlt~ and R~ Resporult Serviw
ERT--poundnviloo-I~T cFR-IederllllqiNr
L TCs--loolmiddot Tenn C-1Sonrqy
MCU-MWmum e-n Leve~ MCIClo--Mum~ Level Gooh
MOU--Manonndum or Undenandioamp -J NCP llllOOIIOolooclllaurdousSub~UoltaPoll-~ Plao
NPL---lJauoul Pnonucs Ust
~RT MIOOIOiileltpon1Teom
r
Lilt of Acronymbull (Continued)
OampM--Oper~~ion and Mainrenancc
OMB-Office or Manqemenl and Budaet
OPA-Ofrce o( Policy Analy5is
ORC-office of ReJional Counsel
ORO--OffiCe of Rtse3tth and Developmen1
0SC~-Sccne Coontinawr
OSWER-otlia ofSolid w and~~ PA-Preliminaoy Dl
PRP-IoknWIIy Responsible Piny
PRSC-Post-Removal She Control
QAIQC-Quolily AsAnnco~Quoily Conuol
RA--RJiooal Adminiscnooc
RRT- RqiONIR_T
RCRA-Raowa ConlaVIIion tnd Recovery Act
RDT--Recional Decision Team
RWS- RemcdiallnvesripaionFeuibility SNdy
ROO-a-t orDecislon
RPM--Remodiol Project Maollor SACM- spailnd Aca~ ap Model
SARA--ampoporfwld ~ ond ~A of 19ft
SI-Si10 l_ao
sm-superllld IMoO TcchnolotY EVIIUIIdoo
START-Sopnfmd Technial _ IIOd a_ TQII
TAT-Tedwal Assiscancc Team
TBC-To Be Coomdltml
TIO-Technolov IMovllioo orr UAO-UnilMrlt AdmmampStliWt Onltt
r
Llot of Acronymo (Continued)
USG5-Uniled Swes OcoloJical Survey
VISrrT- Vendor lnfonnalion System for Innovative Treauoeat Techn~oeies
VOC- Volllile Orionic Compound
- J
r
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The purpose of thiSJUidance is 10 provide infOITTialion on the procedures and ICtivitiellhe US EnvitonmeniAI Proceaion Aacncy (EPA) uses in conductinamp non-~-critical removal actioos
C~~Jo~H=u7su~=~il~=middot~~~~~~J~cgt ~rMMl~=~~~~~~is~~=~~~~~c= IOCMun tJUIMions and EPA policy
me~~~=~~~=~~~~i~7 conaua for how noa-tune~llell rtmovaiiCtioos fit wilhia the overall Supefflmd prosnm
Chapter I tonCampIns stcn sccuons as IOIIows
~describes non-timeltnucal ~moval actionJ in ~ladon 10 the SuperfwldAltalmued Cleup Model (SACM)
~ provuits an overvttw or dtc rtmoval proce$1=~~~-=aru=~~~de- Stale Md privlle
~ owlines lhe ~ availabkiOOSCsRPMs in conductinc ooa-dmeshycnlicll removal actions
~describe$ cnfortemcnt and C0$1 recovery actMdes
tf~c~~=ment and adminlanlive record requiremera
sampIIL1l dacribts Action Memonndum requimntnts for non-dmrltribcal removt~~CtMJU
(~~~~=~middotr=~~=shy~ro=ioc~~~~~=t~le forpubticYsvolwnat and taluaampa Md recommends the 1ppt0pn11e rapouc
~~ detcriba rouoq ~ kaalJ provtdes lftDmHM 01 bulltin IIOrl-tune-cndcal remoVIIIICtiOM tnl) be llppfOpfIQIamp and 01 ~ Epound1CA dctkJpment proccu
c
- J
r
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Smimtll dcscribes the purpose and con1ent of the EEICA Approval Memorandum
~explains ttwlht Exeeudve SuiMlary should provde I aencrll overview of the EECA
~~~~~i~~~=r~==~oo~~~re~ OIId weu risks posed by the site
ScsdDAli o~middottlines how to identify removaltction objecriva for the DOn-timemiddot cntical removal action
~clesltribcolhcprltXe$$1oridencifyina ondlllllyzinarltmoYII ICtioo alampauampiva
~describes how to~ removal a~ altenladva forcffeaivmas impampemenubtbty and rose
SalioliLU doscnbes -tocleoenninelhc roconuncadcd rltngtOYIIICtioo altttnllivc
pidlatc~~~~thllmiddotma~~~~===poacaoedlllhccood-ofalthsecdooofcbis~widgtmiddotliorofra-poacaoedia odiaAolcbis ~8-akcywonliadeaofusediacbis -~-aCOfiiIOIUooollhc EECIIproca~ond lhc romodial on lllldy (RIIFS) proceu ~ D _a model Nocice of IJecisMgto Not 10 IC Special Nocke Procedures
1 bull 1 THE IACM APPROACH s~=~~~~~-=r~1==-middot aaioftl t can be ied 10 a broed ~my of respouc aiou Spec16clll) SACM involveamp
A cooa ~ for tueaiDc si~especifk cooditionllnd the MOd for 001
~T-~==-plaoaina --or~oo~-~
~~~-o(~ SACM should bo mwdmd lor all S_rud acltivllies aoioftamp as imple- io
-wllh reqwe o( lhc NCP IIIII CEitltlA MtaiJ Swpaflond _ priorilia
-middot-~~n~==oa~cndoltht~mupp1gtCUOOIIdbetler--aiiSupetllnd__
-J
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
H~iira -rt~la I- ~ bull n-~- ~ a~ bull
bull R shy~r~[ ~
fi u
ItH
J
r
No tice
The policies and procedwes 5eC rorth herein Ire intended solely IS JUidance for IOvemmcal penonncl They 1ft ncx intended nor can they be relied on to crea~e any riahu ~forceable by
~n=n~~of~~o~~~~ middot~v~~~~e~~ specific she circumstances The Aaency also reservealhe ri1ht tochanae this pidance at any time whhout public notice
c
r
Contentbull
flu 10 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1
11 The SACM Appro1ch l
11 Overview or tbe Removal Action Procw 3
l J Rolu ~=~~C~= ~~~ ~ Sta~t lnvolvernen1 8
~=~~~~~~amp~~lncV~(~sqmiddot 1 4 RtJOUrctS 9
15 Enforurnrnl aad Cost Recovery 10 PRP Search and ldcntification bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull I 0 Notict letrtts bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull I 0 PRP Nepiadon II COR Recovery bull bull bull bullbull bullbull bullbull bullbullbull bull II
l Publk lavohUMDt aad Ult Actlalltnllbulle Record bullbull bullbullbull bull11 Cornrnunicy Relations Requircrneau bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 13 AdoniniwmReeanlRcquimnoou 14
1 7 Action lflemorandum 15
1 1 Oa-Sctne Coordlulor Reporu bull bull 17
J O CONDUCTING THE ENGLIEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (Ef)IC A) It
1 1 OtMw It
1 1 EEICA Approval Met~~or~adum bullbull bullbull bullbull bull bullbull bull bullbullbull obullbull bullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ll
l o J EEICA EttcUdbulle Sumbullary bullbull o bullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbull o bullbullbull o lJ
1 4 Silt CWCttriaatioa obullbull bullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbull o bullbull o bullbull o l4 s ocripcjoo Badltpouocl 25 ltVIOUS RemltWaiAshy 26 Sowtc Nacure llld EltiCDI ofCOAlllninadon 27 Anolyucal 0 21 ~vnhncd Risk EvIUMion _ 29
c
r
J I
Contents (Continued)
1 5 ldentlncallon or Remonl ActiCNI Scope Goals and ObjtltliYQ 31
Swwory LimiiSooRemovaiActions 31 Detenninalion of Removal Scope 32 Determination or Removal Schedule bull bull bull 32
16 ldtntlncatlon 10d Aoalysls or Remoyen11 Acllon Allernallves 33 bull bullbull bull bull bull bull
Treatment Tec hnoloaics 33 Trutmcnt TechooioaY lnfonnodon Sowlta 34 Effecuveoess l 5 ~1) 40 Cool 43
1 7 Coapantln Aaalysis of Rt bullobullal Actloa AltuutJves bull bull bull bull bull 45
1 1 lltcommtadtd Rcmobullal Acliea Alamperutln bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 45
Rerereocu bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 47
Key Wonl 51
54c-- ol DICA 10 IUifS
Model Nodce ol llecloloa Nolaquo 10 UN Spedol Notke Procedures bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
-J
--
r
Esblbh liJulllw
I
2
3
4
s 6
I
J
Exhibits
~ NonmiddotTune-Criticamp Removal Action ProcesJ S
Aclion Memorandum Ou1 line 16
EfJCA OeoCIopmenlProcess 21
EEICA ApprovampJ Memorudum 22
EfJCA Oulline 23
Wonnaion From Pttvious Removal Acdons Applicbc To Cunac EEICA 27
ObjcctlvesCritcria To Be Used in eomprie Analysis fA Ahcmadva bullbullbull 36
ldcncilic ond E_ ol AlWU Durioamp NcomiddotTune-Critical Removal Aaions 31
c
-J
r
Uat of Acronymbull
AOC-Administrltive Order on Coosem
ARAIU-Appliablt or Relevant and Appropriaampe Requiremtnu
ARC5-AJtemuive Remedial Contractina Stratqy
ATSOR-Aaency for Toxic Substances and Disease ReJisuy
ATTIC-AJtenuldve Trtument Tcchnoloc lnfonnadon Center
CA-Coopcradve Apecment
CERCLA--CoheOJi Ellironmclllll Respoouc Compcasllioo and UabUily llaquot of 1980 uamcnded
CFR--Code or Federal Replllions
CLP--Coalnltt labonlofy llopam
CLU-IN--Cieanup lnr Bulktia Boon
CRP-Commuruty Rcllliofts Plan
()()()-l)eponm or or= DOE--Oeputmenc or Eaell
EEICA-E-rinc EJIIIIioogtColt Anllysis
Els-ampvuonmenul ~ s-meot
EPA-United S Enviroamcnall -ltion AaailtY
ERCS-EmerttntY ReiJIOI Cleanup Services
ERR$-EmetJltnlt~ and R~ Resporult Serviw
ERT--poundnviloo-I~T cFR-IederllllqiNr
L TCs--loolmiddot Tenn C-1Sonrqy
MCU-MWmum e-n Leve~ MCIClo--Mum~ Level Gooh
MOU--Manonndum or Undenandioamp -J NCP llllOOIIOolooclllaurdousSub~UoltaPoll-~ Plao
NPL---lJauoul Pnonucs Ust
~RT MIOOIOiileltpon1Teom
r
Lilt of Acronymbull (Continued)
OampM--Oper~~ion and Mainrenancc
OMB-Office or Manqemenl and Budaet
OPA-Ofrce o( Policy Analy5is
ORC-office of ReJional Counsel
ORO--OffiCe of Rtse3tth and Developmen1
0SC~-Sccne Coontinawr
OSWER-otlia ofSolid w and~~ PA-Preliminaoy Dl
PRP-IoknWIIy Responsible Piny
PRSC-Post-Removal She Control
QAIQC-Quolily AsAnnco~Quoily Conuol
RA--RJiooal Adminiscnooc
RRT- RqiONIR_T
RCRA-Raowa ConlaVIIion tnd Recovery Act
RDT--Recional Decision Team
RWS- RemcdiallnvesripaionFeuibility SNdy
ROO-a-t orDecislon
RPM--Remodiol Project Maollor SACM- spailnd Aca~ ap Model
SARA--ampoporfwld ~ ond ~A of 19ft
SI-Si10 l_ao
sm-superllld IMoO TcchnolotY EVIIUIIdoo
START-Sopnfmd Technial _ IIOd a_ TQII
TAT-Tedwal Assiscancc Team
TBC-To Be Coomdltml
TIO-Technolov IMovllioo orr UAO-UnilMrlt AdmmampStliWt Onltt
r
Llot of Acronymo (Continued)
USG5-Uniled Swes OcoloJical Survey
VISrrT- Vendor lnfonnalion System for Innovative Treauoeat Techn~oeies
VOC- Volllile Orionic Compound
- J
r
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The purpose of thiSJUidance is 10 provide infOITTialion on the procedures and ICtivitiellhe US EnvitonmeniAI Proceaion Aacncy (EPA) uses in conductinamp non-~-critical removal actioos
C~~Jo~H=u7su~=~il~=middot~~~~~~J~cgt ~rMMl~=~~~~~~is~~=~~~~~c= IOCMun tJUIMions and EPA policy
me~~~=~~~=~~~~i~7 conaua for how noa-tune~llell rtmovaiiCtioos fit wilhia the overall Supefflmd prosnm
Chapter I tonCampIns stcn sccuons as IOIIows
~describes non-timeltnucal ~moval actionJ in ~ladon 10 the SuperfwldAltalmued Cleup Model (SACM)
~ provuits an overvttw or dtc rtmoval proce$1=~~~-=aru=~~~de- Stale Md privlle
~ owlines lhe ~ availabkiOOSCsRPMs in conductinc ooa-dmeshycnlicll removal actions
~describe$ cnfortemcnt and C0$1 recovery actMdes
tf~c~~=ment and adminlanlive record requiremera
sampIIL1l dacribts Action Memonndum requimntnts for non-dmrltribcal removt~~CtMJU
(~~~~=~middotr=~~=shy~ro=ioc~~~~~=t~le forpubticYsvolwnat and taluaampa Md recommends the 1ppt0pn11e rapouc
~~ detcriba rouoq ~ kaalJ provtdes lftDmHM 01 bulltin IIOrl-tune-cndcal remoVIIIICtiOM tnl) be llppfOpfIQIamp and 01 ~ Epound1CA dctkJpment proccu
c
- J
r
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Smimtll dcscribes the purpose and con1ent of the EEICA Approval Memorandum
~explains ttwlht Exeeudve SuiMlary should provde I aencrll overview of the EECA
~~~~~i~~~=r~==~oo~~~re~ OIId weu risks posed by the site
ScsdDAli o~middottlines how to identify removaltction objecriva for the DOn-timemiddot cntical removal action
~clesltribcolhcprltXe$$1oridencifyina ondlllllyzinarltmoYII ICtioo alampauampiva
~describes how to~ removal a~ altenladva forcffeaivmas impampemenubtbty and rose
SalioliLU doscnbes -tocleoenninelhc roconuncadcd rltngtOYIIICtioo altttnllivc
pidlatc~~~~thllmiddotma~~~~===poacaoedlllhccood-ofalthsecdooofcbis~widgtmiddotliorofra-poacaoedia odiaAolcbis ~8-akcywonliadeaofusediacbis -~-aCOfiiIOIUooollhc EECIIproca~ond lhc romodial on lllldy (RIIFS) proceu ~ D _a model Nocice of IJecisMgto Not 10 IC Special Nocke Procedures
1 bull 1 THE IACM APPROACH s~=~~~~~-=r~1==-middot aaioftl t can be ied 10 a broed ~my of respouc aiou Spec16clll) SACM involveamp
A cooa ~ for tueaiDc si~especifk cooditionllnd the MOd for 001
~T-~==-plaoaina --or~oo~-~
~~~-o(~ SACM should bo mwdmd lor all S_rud acltivllies aoioftamp as imple- io
-wllh reqwe o( lhc NCP IIIII CEitltlA MtaiJ Swpaflond _ priorilia
-middot-~~n~==oa~cndoltht~mupp1gtCUOOIIdbetler--aiiSupetllnd__
-J
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
No tice
The policies and procedwes 5eC rorth herein Ire intended solely IS JUidance for IOvemmcal penonncl They 1ft ncx intended nor can they be relied on to crea~e any riahu ~forceable by
~n=n~~of~~o~~~~ middot~v~~~~e~~ specific she circumstances The Aaency also reservealhe ri1ht tochanae this pidance at any time whhout public notice
c
r
Contentbull
flu 10 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1
11 The SACM Appro1ch l
11 Overview or tbe Removal Action Procw 3
l J Rolu ~=~~C~= ~~~ ~ Sta~t lnvolvernen1 8
~=~~~~~~amp~~lncV~(~sqmiddot 1 4 RtJOUrctS 9
15 Enforurnrnl aad Cost Recovery 10 PRP Search and ldcntification bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull I 0 Notict letrtts bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull I 0 PRP Nepiadon II COR Recovery bull bull bull bullbull bullbull bullbull bullbullbull bull II
l Publk lavohUMDt aad Ult Actlalltnllbulle Record bullbull bullbullbull bull11 Cornrnunicy Relations Requircrneau bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 13 AdoniniwmReeanlRcquimnoou 14
1 7 Action lflemorandum 15
1 1 Oa-Sctne Coordlulor Reporu bull bull 17
J O CONDUCTING THE ENGLIEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (Ef)IC A) It
1 1 OtMw It
1 1 EEICA Approval Met~~or~adum bullbull bullbull bullbull bull bullbull bull bullbullbull obullbull bullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ll
l o J EEICA EttcUdbulle Sumbullary bullbull o bullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbull o bullbullbull o lJ
1 4 Silt CWCttriaatioa obullbull bullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbull o bullbull o bullbull o l4 s ocripcjoo Badltpouocl 25 ltVIOUS RemltWaiAshy 26 Sowtc Nacure llld EltiCDI ofCOAlllninadon 27 Anolyucal 0 21 ~vnhncd Risk EvIUMion _ 29
c
r
J I
Contents (Continued)
1 5 ldentlncallon or Remonl ActiCNI Scope Goals and ObjtltliYQ 31
Swwory LimiiSooRemovaiActions 31 Detenninalion of Removal Scope 32 Determination or Removal Schedule bull bull bull 32
16 ldtntlncatlon 10d Aoalysls or Remoyen11 Acllon Allernallves 33 bull bullbull bull bull bull bull
Treatment Tec hnoloaics 33 Trutmcnt TechooioaY lnfonnodon Sowlta 34 Effecuveoess l 5 ~1) 40 Cool 43
1 7 Coapantln Aaalysis of Rt bullobullal Actloa AltuutJves bull bull bull bull bull 45
1 1 lltcommtadtd Rcmobullal Acliea Alamperutln bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 45
Rerereocu bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 47
Key Wonl 51
54c-- ol DICA 10 IUifS
Model Nodce ol llecloloa Nolaquo 10 UN Spedol Notke Procedures bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
-J
--
r
Esblbh liJulllw
I
2
3
4
s 6
I
J
Exhibits
~ NonmiddotTune-Criticamp Removal Action ProcesJ S
Aclion Memorandum Ou1 line 16
EfJCA OeoCIopmenlProcess 21
EEICA ApprovampJ Memorudum 22
EfJCA Oulline 23
Wonnaion From Pttvious Removal Acdons Applicbc To Cunac EEICA 27
ObjcctlvesCritcria To Be Used in eomprie Analysis fA Ahcmadva bullbullbull 36
ldcncilic ond E_ ol AlWU Durioamp NcomiddotTune-Critical Removal Aaions 31
c
-J
r
Uat of Acronymbull
AOC-Administrltive Order on Coosem
ARAIU-Appliablt or Relevant and Appropriaampe Requiremtnu
ARC5-AJtemuive Remedial Contractina Stratqy
ATSOR-Aaency for Toxic Substances and Disease ReJisuy
ATTIC-AJtenuldve Trtument Tcchnoloc lnfonnadon Center
CA-Coopcradve Apecment
CERCLA--CoheOJi Ellironmclllll Respoouc Compcasllioo and UabUily llaquot of 1980 uamcnded
CFR--Code or Federal Replllions
CLP--Coalnltt labonlofy llopam
CLU-IN--Cieanup lnr Bulktia Boon
CRP-Commuruty Rcllliofts Plan
()()()-l)eponm or or= DOE--Oeputmenc or Eaell
EEICA-E-rinc EJIIIIioogtColt Anllysis
Els-ampvuonmenul ~ s-meot
EPA-United S Enviroamcnall -ltion AaailtY
ERCS-EmerttntY ReiJIOI Cleanup Services
ERR$-EmetJltnlt~ and R~ Resporult Serviw
ERT--poundnviloo-I~T cFR-IederllllqiNr
L TCs--loolmiddot Tenn C-1Sonrqy
MCU-MWmum e-n Leve~ MCIClo--Mum~ Level Gooh
MOU--Manonndum or Undenandioamp -J NCP llllOOIIOolooclllaurdousSub~UoltaPoll-~ Plao
NPL---lJauoul Pnonucs Ust
~RT MIOOIOiileltpon1Teom
r
Lilt of Acronymbull (Continued)
OampM--Oper~~ion and Mainrenancc
OMB-Office or Manqemenl and Budaet
OPA-Ofrce o( Policy Analy5is
ORC-office of ReJional Counsel
ORO--OffiCe of Rtse3tth and Developmen1
0SC~-Sccne Coontinawr
OSWER-otlia ofSolid w and~~ PA-Preliminaoy Dl
PRP-IoknWIIy Responsible Piny
PRSC-Post-Removal She Control
QAIQC-Quolily AsAnnco~Quoily Conuol
RA--RJiooal Adminiscnooc
RRT- RqiONIR_T
RCRA-Raowa ConlaVIIion tnd Recovery Act
RDT--Recional Decision Team
RWS- RemcdiallnvesripaionFeuibility SNdy
ROO-a-t orDecislon
RPM--Remodiol Project Maollor SACM- spailnd Aca~ ap Model
SARA--ampoporfwld ~ ond ~A of 19ft
SI-Si10 l_ao
sm-superllld IMoO TcchnolotY EVIIUIIdoo
START-Sopnfmd Technial _ IIOd a_ TQII
TAT-Tedwal Assiscancc Team
TBC-To Be Coomdltml
TIO-Technolov IMovllioo orr UAO-UnilMrlt AdmmampStliWt Onltt
r
Llot of Acronymo (Continued)
USG5-Uniled Swes OcoloJical Survey
VISrrT- Vendor lnfonnalion System for Innovative Treauoeat Techn~oeies
VOC- Volllile Orionic Compound
- J
r
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The purpose of thiSJUidance is 10 provide infOITTialion on the procedures and ICtivitiellhe US EnvitonmeniAI Proceaion Aacncy (EPA) uses in conductinamp non-~-critical removal actioos
C~~Jo~H=u7su~=~il~=middot~~~~~~J~cgt ~rMMl~=~~~~~~is~~=~~~~~c= IOCMun tJUIMions and EPA policy
me~~~=~~~=~~~~i~7 conaua for how noa-tune~llell rtmovaiiCtioos fit wilhia the overall Supefflmd prosnm
Chapter I tonCampIns stcn sccuons as IOIIows
~describes non-timeltnucal ~moval actionJ in ~ladon 10 the SuperfwldAltalmued Cleup Model (SACM)
~ provuits an overvttw or dtc rtmoval proce$1=~~~-=aru=~~~de- Stale Md privlle
~ owlines lhe ~ availabkiOOSCsRPMs in conductinc ooa-dmeshycnlicll removal actions
~describe$ cnfortemcnt and C0$1 recovery actMdes
tf~c~~=ment and adminlanlive record requiremera
sampIIL1l dacribts Action Memonndum requimntnts for non-dmrltribcal removt~~CtMJU
(~~~~=~middotr=~~=shy~ro=ioc~~~~~=t~le forpubticYsvolwnat and taluaampa Md recommends the 1ppt0pn11e rapouc
~~ detcriba rouoq ~ kaalJ provtdes lftDmHM 01 bulltin IIOrl-tune-cndcal remoVIIIICtiOM tnl) be llppfOpfIQIamp and 01 ~ Epound1CA dctkJpment proccu
c
- J
r
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Smimtll dcscribes the purpose and con1ent of the EEICA Approval Memorandum
~explains ttwlht Exeeudve SuiMlary should provde I aencrll overview of the EECA
~~~~~i~~~=r~==~oo~~~re~ OIId weu risks posed by the site
ScsdDAli o~middottlines how to identify removaltction objecriva for the DOn-timemiddot cntical removal action
~clesltribcolhcprltXe$$1oridencifyina ondlllllyzinarltmoYII ICtioo alampauampiva
~describes how to~ removal a~ altenladva forcffeaivmas impampemenubtbty and rose
SalioliLU doscnbes -tocleoenninelhc roconuncadcd rltngtOYIIICtioo altttnllivc
pidlatc~~~~thllmiddotma~~~~===poacaoedlllhccood-ofalthsecdooofcbis~widgtmiddotliorofra-poacaoedia odiaAolcbis ~8-akcywonliadeaofusediacbis -~-aCOfiiIOIUooollhc EECIIproca~ond lhc romodial on lllldy (RIIFS) proceu ~ D _a model Nocice of IJecisMgto Not 10 IC Special Nocke Procedures
1 bull 1 THE IACM APPROACH s~=~~~~~-=r~1==-middot aaioftl t can be ied 10 a broed ~my of respouc aiou Spec16clll) SACM involveamp
A cooa ~ for tueaiDc si~especifk cooditionllnd the MOd for 001
~T-~==-plaoaina --or~oo~-~
~~~-o(~ SACM should bo mwdmd lor all S_rud acltivllies aoioftamp as imple- io
-wllh reqwe o( lhc NCP IIIII CEitltlA MtaiJ Swpaflond _ priorilia
-middot-~~n~==oa~cndoltht~mupp1gtCUOOIIdbetler--aiiSupetllnd__
-J
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
Contentbull
flu 10 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1
11 The SACM Appro1ch l
11 Overview or tbe Removal Action Procw 3
l J Rolu ~=~~C~= ~~~ ~ Sta~t lnvolvernen1 8
~=~~~~~~amp~~lncV~(~sqmiddot 1 4 RtJOUrctS 9
15 Enforurnrnl aad Cost Recovery 10 PRP Search and ldcntification bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull I 0 Notict letrtts bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull I 0 PRP Nepiadon II COR Recovery bull bull bull bullbull bullbull bullbull bullbullbull bull II
l Publk lavohUMDt aad Ult Actlalltnllbulle Record bullbull bullbullbull bull11 Cornrnunicy Relations Requircrneau bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 13 AdoniniwmReeanlRcquimnoou 14
1 7 Action lflemorandum 15
1 1 Oa-Sctne Coordlulor Reporu bull bull 17
J O CONDUCTING THE ENGLIEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (Ef)IC A) It
1 1 OtMw It
1 1 EEICA Approval Met~~or~adum bullbull bullbull bullbull bull bullbull bull bullbullbull obullbull bullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ll
l o J EEICA EttcUdbulle Sumbullary bullbull o bullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbull o bullbullbull o lJ
1 4 Silt CWCttriaatioa obullbull bullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbull o bullbull o bullbull o l4 s ocripcjoo Badltpouocl 25 ltVIOUS RemltWaiAshy 26 Sowtc Nacure llld EltiCDI ofCOAlllninadon 27 Anolyucal 0 21 ~vnhncd Risk EvIUMion _ 29
c
r
J I
Contents (Continued)
1 5 ldentlncallon or Remonl ActiCNI Scope Goals and ObjtltliYQ 31
Swwory LimiiSooRemovaiActions 31 Detenninalion of Removal Scope 32 Determination or Removal Schedule bull bull bull 32
16 ldtntlncatlon 10d Aoalysls or Remoyen11 Acllon Allernallves 33 bull bullbull bull bull bull bull
Treatment Tec hnoloaics 33 Trutmcnt TechooioaY lnfonnodon Sowlta 34 Effecuveoess l 5 ~1) 40 Cool 43
1 7 Coapantln Aaalysis of Rt bullobullal Actloa AltuutJves bull bull bull bull bull 45
1 1 lltcommtadtd Rcmobullal Acliea Alamperutln bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 45
Rerereocu bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 47
Key Wonl 51
54c-- ol DICA 10 IUifS
Model Nodce ol llecloloa Nolaquo 10 UN Spedol Notke Procedures bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
-J
--
r
Esblbh liJulllw
I
2
3
4
s 6
I
J
Exhibits
~ NonmiddotTune-Criticamp Removal Action ProcesJ S
Aclion Memorandum Ou1 line 16
EfJCA OeoCIopmenlProcess 21
EEICA ApprovampJ Memorudum 22
EfJCA Oulline 23
Wonnaion From Pttvious Removal Acdons Applicbc To Cunac EEICA 27
ObjcctlvesCritcria To Be Used in eomprie Analysis fA Ahcmadva bullbullbull 36
ldcncilic ond E_ ol AlWU Durioamp NcomiddotTune-Critical Removal Aaions 31
c
-J
r
Uat of Acronymbull
AOC-Administrltive Order on Coosem
ARAIU-Appliablt or Relevant and Appropriaampe Requiremtnu
ARC5-AJtemuive Remedial Contractina Stratqy
ATSOR-Aaency for Toxic Substances and Disease ReJisuy
ATTIC-AJtenuldve Trtument Tcchnoloc lnfonnadon Center
CA-Coopcradve Apecment
CERCLA--CoheOJi Ellironmclllll Respoouc Compcasllioo and UabUily llaquot of 1980 uamcnded
CFR--Code or Federal Replllions
CLP--Coalnltt labonlofy llopam
CLU-IN--Cieanup lnr Bulktia Boon
CRP-Commuruty Rcllliofts Plan
()()()-l)eponm or or= DOE--Oeputmenc or Eaell
EEICA-E-rinc EJIIIIioogtColt Anllysis
Els-ampvuonmenul ~ s-meot
EPA-United S Enviroamcnall -ltion AaailtY
ERCS-EmerttntY ReiJIOI Cleanup Services
ERR$-EmetJltnlt~ and R~ Resporult Serviw
ERT--poundnviloo-I~T cFR-IederllllqiNr
L TCs--loolmiddot Tenn C-1Sonrqy
MCU-MWmum e-n Leve~ MCIClo--Mum~ Level Gooh
MOU--Manonndum or Undenandioamp -J NCP llllOOIIOolooclllaurdousSub~UoltaPoll-~ Plao
NPL---lJauoul Pnonucs Ust
~RT MIOOIOiileltpon1Teom
r
Lilt of Acronymbull (Continued)
OampM--Oper~~ion and Mainrenancc
OMB-Office or Manqemenl and Budaet
OPA-Ofrce o( Policy Analy5is
ORC-office of ReJional Counsel
ORO--OffiCe of Rtse3tth and Developmen1
0SC~-Sccne Coontinawr
OSWER-otlia ofSolid w and~~ PA-Preliminaoy Dl
PRP-IoknWIIy Responsible Piny
PRSC-Post-Removal She Control
QAIQC-Quolily AsAnnco~Quoily Conuol
RA--RJiooal Adminiscnooc
RRT- RqiONIR_T
RCRA-Raowa ConlaVIIion tnd Recovery Act
RDT--Recional Decision Team
RWS- RemcdiallnvesripaionFeuibility SNdy
ROO-a-t orDecislon
RPM--Remodiol Project Maollor SACM- spailnd Aca~ ap Model
SARA--ampoporfwld ~ ond ~A of 19ft
SI-Si10 l_ao
sm-superllld IMoO TcchnolotY EVIIUIIdoo
START-Sopnfmd Technial _ IIOd a_ TQII
TAT-Tedwal Assiscancc Team
TBC-To Be Coomdltml
TIO-Technolov IMovllioo orr UAO-UnilMrlt AdmmampStliWt Onltt
r
Llot of Acronymo (Continued)
USG5-Uniled Swes OcoloJical Survey
VISrrT- Vendor lnfonnalion System for Innovative Treauoeat Techn~oeies
VOC- Volllile Orionic Compound
- J
r
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The purpose of thiSJUidance is 10 provide infOITTialion on the procedures and ICtivitiellhe US EnvitonmeniAI Proceaion Aacncy (EPA) uses in conductinamp non-~-critical removal actioos
C~~Jo~H=u7su~=~il~=middot~~~~~~J~cgt ~rMMl~=~~~~~~is~~=~~~~~c= IOCMun tJUIMions and EPA policy
me~~~=~~~=~~~~i~7 conaua for how noa-tune~llell rtmovaiiCtioos fit wilhia the overall Supefflmd prosnm
Chapter I tonCampIns stcn sccuons as IOIIows
~describes non-timeltnucal ~moval actionJ in ~ladon 10 the SuperfwldAltalmued Cleup Model (SACM)
~ provuits an overvttw or dtc rtmoval proce$1=~~~-=aru=~~~de- Stale Md privlle
~ owlines lhe ~ availabkiOOSCsRPMs in conductinc ooa-dmeshycnlicll removal actions
~describe$ cnfortemcnt and C0$1 recovery actMdes
tf~c~~=ment and adminlanlive record requiremera
sampIIL1l dacribts Action Memonndum requimntnts for non-dmrltribcal removt~~CtMJU
(~~~~=~middotr=~~=shy~ro=ioc~~~~~=t~le forpubticYsvolwnat and taluaampa Md recommends the 1ppt0pn11e rapouc
~~ detcriba rouoq ~ kaalJ provtdes lftDmHM 01 bulltin IIOrl-tune-cndcal remoVIIIICtiOM tnl) be llppfOpfIQIamp and 01 ~ Epound1CA dctkJpment proccu
c
- J
r
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Smimtll dcscribes the purpose and con1ent of the EEICA Approval Memorandum
~explains ttwlht Exeeudve SuiMlary should provde I aencrll overview of the EECA
~~~~~i~~~=r~==~oo~~~re~ OIId weu risks posed by the site
ScsdDAli o~middottlines how to identify removaltction objecriva for the DOn-timemiddot cntical removal action
~clesltribcolhcprltXe$$1oridencifyina ondlllllyzinarltmoYII ICtioo alampauampiva
~describes how to~ removal a~ altenladva forcffeaivmas impampemenubtbty and rose
SalioliLU doscnbes -tocleoenninelhc roconuncadcd rltngtOYIIICtioo altttnllivc
pidlatc~~~~thllmiddotma~~~~===poacaoedlllhccood-ofalthsecdooofcbis~widgtmiddotliorofra-poacaoedia odiaAolcbis ~8-akcywonliadeaofusediacbis -~-aCOfiiIOIUooollhc EECIIproca~ond lhc romodial on lllldy (RIIFS) proceu ~ D _a model Nocice of IJecisMgto Not 10 IC Special Nocke Procedures
1 bull 1 THE IACM APPROACH s~=~~~~~-=r~1==-middot aaioftl t can be ied 10 a broed ~my of respouc aiou Spec16clll) SACM involveamp
A cooa ~ for tueaiDc si~especifk cooditionllnd the MOd for 001
~T-~==-plaoaina --or~oo~-~
~~~-o(~ SACM should bo mwdmd lor all S_rud acltivllies aoioftamp as imple- io
-wllh reqwe o( lhc NCP IIIII CEitltlA MtaiJ Swpaflond _ priorilia
-middot-~~n~==oa~cndoltht~mupp1gtCUOOIIdbetler--aiiSupetllnd__
-J
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
J I
Contents (Continued)
1 5 ldentlncallon or Remonl ActiCNI Scope Goals and ObjtltliYQ 31
Swwory LimiiSooRemovaiActions 31 Detenninalion of Removal Scope 32 Determination or Removal Schedule bull bull bull 32
16 ldtntlncatlon 10d Aoalysls or Remoyen11 Acllon Allernallves 33 bull bullbull bull bull bull bull
Treatment Tec hnoloaics 33 Trutmcnt TechooioaY lnfonnodon Sowlta 34 Effecuveoess l 5 ~1) 40 Cool 43
1 7 Coapantln Aaalysis of Rt bullobullal Actloa AltuutJves bull bull bull bull bull 45
1 1 lltcommtadtd Rcmobullal Acliea Alamperutln bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 45
Rerereocu bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 47
Key Wonl 51
54c-- ol DICA 10 IUifS
Model Nodce ol llecloloa Nolaquo 10 UN Spedol Notke Procedures bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
-J
--
r
Esblbh liJulllw
I
2
3
4
s 6
I
J
Exhibits
~ NonmiddotTune-Criticamp Removal Action ProcesJ S
Aclion Memorandum Ou1 line 16
EfJCA OeoCIopmenlProcess 21
EEICA ApprovampJ Memorudum 22
EfJCA Oulline 23
Wonnaion From Pttvious Removal Acdons Applicbc To Cunac EEICA 27
ObjcctlvesCritcria To Be Used in eomprie Analysis fA Ahcmadva bullbullbull 36
ldcncilic ond E_ ol AlWU Durioamp NcomiddotTune-Critical Removal Aaions 31
c
-J
r
Uat of Acronymbull
AOC-Administrltive Order on Coosem
ARAIU-Appliablt or Relevant and Appropriaampe Requiremtnu
ARC5-AJtemuive Remedial Contractina Stratqy
ATSOR-Aaency for Toxic Substances and Disease ReJisuy
ATTIC-AJtenuldve Trtument Tcchnoloc lnfonnadon Center
CA-Coopcradve Apecment
CERCLA--CoheOJi Ellironmclllll Respoouc Compcasllioo and UabUily llaquot of 1980 uamcnded
CFR--Code or Federal Replllions
CLP--Coalnltt labonlofy llopam
CLU-IN--Cieanup lnr Bulktia Boon
CRP-Commuruty Rcllliofts Plan
()()()-l)eponm or or= DOE--Oeputmenc or Eaell
EEICA-E-rinc EJIIIIioogtColt Anllysis
Els-ampvuonmenul ~ s-meot
EPA-United S Enviroamcnall -ltion AaailtY
ERCS-EmerttntY ReiJIOI Cleanup Services
ERR$-EmetJltnlt~ and R~ Resporult Serviw
ERT--poundnviloo-I~T cFR-IederllllqiNr
L TCs--loolmiddot Tenn C-1Sonrqy
MCU-MWmum e-n Leve~ MCIClo--Mum~ Level Gooh
MOU--Manonndum or Undenandioamp -J NCP llllOOIIOolooclllaurdousSub~UoltaPoll-~ Plao
NPL---lJauoul Pnonucs Ust
~RT MIOOIOiileltpon1Teom
r
Lilt of Acronymbull (Continued)
OampM--Oper~~ion and Mainrenancc
OMB-Office or Manqemenl and Budaet
OPA-Ofrce o( Policy Analy5is
ORC-office of ReJional Counsel
ORO--OffiCe of Rtse3tth and Developmen1
0SC~-Sccne Coontinawr
OSWER-otlia ofSolid w and~~ PA-Preliminaoy Dl
PRP-IoknWIIy Responsible Piny
PRSC-Post-Removal She Control
QAIQC-Quolily AsAnnco~Quoily Conuol
RA--RJiooal Adminiscnooc
RRT- RqiONIR_T
RCRA-Raowa ConlaVIIion tnd Recovery Act
RDT--Recional Decision Team
RWS- RemcdiallnvesripaionFeuibility SNdy
ROO-a-t orDecislon
RPM--Remodiol Project Maollor SACM- spailnd Aca~ ap Model
SARA--ampoporfwld ~ ond ~A of 19ft
SI-Si10 l_ao
sm-superllld IMoO TcchnolotY EVIIUIIdoo
START-Sopnfmd Technial _ IIOd a_ TQII
TAT-Tedwal Assiscancc Team
TBC-To Be Coomdltml
TIO-Technolov IMovllioo orr UAO-UnilMrlt AdmmampStliWt Onltt
r
Llot of Acronymo (Continued)
USG5-Uniled Swes OcoloJical Survey
VISrrT- Vendor lnfonnalion System for Innovative Treauoeat Techn~oeies
VOC- Volllile Orionic Compound
- J
r
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The purpose of thiSJUidance is 10 provide infOITTialion on the procedures and ICtivitiellhe US EnvitonmeniAI Proceaion Aacncy (EPA) uses in conductinamp non-~-critical removal actioos
C~~Jo~H=u7su~=~il~=middot~~~~~~J~cgt ~rMMl~=~~~~~~is~~=~~~~~c= IOCMun tJUIMions and EPA policy
me~~~=~~~=~~~~i~7 conaua for how noa-tune~llell rtmovaiiCtioos fit wilhia the overall Supefflmd prosnm
Chapter I tonCampIns stcn sccuons as IOIIows
~describes non-timeltnucal ~moval actionJ in ~ladon 10 the SuperfwldAltalmued Cleup Model (SACM)
~ provuits an overvttw or dtc rtmoval proce$1=~~~-=aru=~~~de- Stale Md privlle
~ owlines lhe ~ availabkiOOSCsRPMs in conductinc ooa-dmeshycnlicll removal actions
~describe$ cnfortemcnt and C0$1 recovery actMdes
tf~c~~=ment and adminlanlive record requiremera
sampIIL1l dacribts Action Memonndum requimntnts for non-dmrltribcal removt~~CtMJU
(~~~~=~middotr=~~=shy~ro=ioc~~~~~=t~le forpubticYsvolwnat and taluaampa Md recommends the 1ppt0pn11e rapouc
~~ detcriba rouoq ~ kaalJ provtdes lftDmHM 01 bulltin IIOrl-tune-cndcal remoVIIIICtiOM tnl) be llppfOpfIQIamp and 01 ~ Epound1CA dctkJpment proccu
c
- J
r
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Smimtll dcscribes the purpose and con1ent of the EEICA Approval Memorandum
~explains ttwlht Exeeudve SuiMlary should provde I aencrll overview of the EECA
~~~~~i~~~=r~==~oo~~~re~ OIId weu risks posed by the site
ScsdDAli o~middottlines how to identify removaltction objecriva for the DOn-timemiddot cntical removal action
~clesltribcolhcprltXe$$1oridencifyina ondlllllyzinarltmoYII ICtioo alampauampiva
~describes how to~ removal a~ altenladva forcffeaivmas impampemenubtbty and rose
SalioliLU doscnbes -tocleoenninelhc roconuncadcd rltngtOYIIICtioo altttnllivc
pidlatc~~~~thllmiddotma~~~~===poacaoedlllhccood-ofalthsecdooofcbis~widgtmiddotliorofra-poacaoedia odiaAolcbis ~8-akcywonliadeaofusediacbis -~-aCOfiiIOIUooollhc EECIIproca~ond lhc romodial on lllldy (RIIFS) proceu ~ D _a model Nocice of IJecisMgto Not 10 IC Special Nocke Procedures
1 bull 1 THE IACM APPROACH s~=~~~~~-=r~1==-middot aaioftl t can be ied 10 a broed ~my of respouc aiou Spec16clll) SACM involveamp
A cooa ~ for tueaiDc si~especifk cooditionllnd the MOd for 001
~T-~==-plaoaina --or~oo~-~
~~~-o(~ SACM should bo mwdmd lor all S_rud acltivllies aoioftamp as imple- io
-wllh reqwe o( lhc NCP IIIII CEitltlA MtaiJ Swpaflond _ priorilia
-middot-~~n~==oa~cndoltht~mupp1gtCUOOIIdbetler--aiiSupetllnd__
-J
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
r
Esblbh liJulllw
I
2
3
4
s 6
I
J
Exhibits
~ NonmiddotTune-Criticamp Removal Action ProcesJ S
Aclion Memorandum Ou1 line 16
EfJCA OeoCIopmenlProcess 21
EEICA ApprovampJ Memorudum 22
EfJCA Oulline 23
Wonnaion From Pttvious Removal Acdons Applicbc To Cunac EEICA 27
ObjcctlvesCritcria To Be Used in eomprie Analysis fA Ahcmadva bullbullbull 36
ldcncilic ond E_ ol AlWU Durioamp NcomiddotTune-Critical Removal Aaions 31
c
-J
r
Uat of Acronymbull
AOC-Administrltive Order on Coosem
ARAIU-Appliablt or Relevant and Appropriaampe Requiremtnu
ARC5-AJtemuive Remedial Contractina Stratqy
ATSOR-Aaency for Toxic Substances and Disease ReJisuy
ATTIC-AJtenuldve Trtument Tcchnoloc lnfonnadon Center
CA-Coopcradve Apecment
CERCLA--CoheOJi Ellironmclllll Respoouc Compcasllioo and UabUily llaquot of 1980 uamcnded
CFR--Code or Federal Replllions
CLP--Coalnltt labonlofy llopam
CLU-IN--Cieanup lnr Bulktia Boon
CRP-Commuruty Rcllliofts Plan
()()()-l)eponm or or= DOE--Oeputmenc or Eaell
EEICA-E-rinc EJIIIIioogtColt Anllysis
Els-ampvuonmenul ~ s-meot
EPA-United S Enviroamcnall -ltion AaailtY
ERCS-EmerttntY ReiJIOI Cleanup Services
ERR$-EmetJltnlt~ and R~ Resporult Serviw
ERT--poundnviloo-I~T cFR-IederllllqiNr
L TCs--loolmiddot Tenn C-1Sonrqy
MCU-MWmum e-n Leve~ MCIClo--Mum~ Level Gooh
MOU--Manonndum or Undenandioamp -J NCP llllOOIIOolooclllaurdousSub~UoltaPoll-~ Plao
NPL---lJauoul Pnonucs Ust
~RT MIOOIOiileltpon1Teom
r
Lilt of Acronymbull (Continued)
OampM--Oper~~ion and Mainrenancc
OMB-Office or Manqemenl and Budaet
OPA-Ofrce o( Policy Analy5is
ORC-office of ReJional Counsel
ORO--OffiCe of Rtse3tth and Developmen1
0SC~-Sccne Coontinawr
OSWER-otlia ofSolid w and~~ PA-Preliminaoy Dl
PRP-IoknWIIy Responsible Piny
PRSC-Post-Removal She Control
QAIQC-Quolily AsAnnco~Quoily Conuol
RA--RJiooal Adminiscnooc
RRT- RqiONIR_T
RCRA-Raowa ConlaVIIion tnd Recovery Act
RDT--Recional Decision Team
RWS- RemcdiallnvesripaionFeuibility SNdy
ROO-a-t orDecislon
RPM--Remodiol Project Maollor SACM- spailnd Aca~ ap Model
SARA--ampoporfwld ~ ond ~A of 19ft
SI-Si10 l_ao
sm-superllld IMoO TcchnolotY EVIIUIIdoo
START-Sopnfmd Technial _ IIOd a_ TQII
TAT-Tedwal Assiscancc Team
TBC-To Be Coomdltml
TIO-Technolov IMovllioo orr UAO-UnilMrlt AdmmampStliWt Onltt
r
Llot of Acronymo (Continued)
USG5-Uniled Swes OcoloJical Survey
VISrrT- Vendor lnfonnalion System for Innovative Treauoeat Techn~oeies
VOC- Volllile Orionic Compound
- J
r
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The purpose of thiSJUidance is 10 provide infOITTialion on the procedures and ICtivitiellhe US EnvitonmeniAI Proceaion Aacncy (EPA) uses in conductinamp non-~-critical removal actioos
C~~Jo~H=u7su~=~il~=middot~~~~~~J~cgt ~rMMl~=~~~~~~is~~=~~~~~c= IOCMun tJUIMions and EPA policy
me~~~=~~~=~~~~i~7 conaua for how noa-tune~llell rtmovaiiCtioos fit wilhia the overall Supefflmd prosnm
Chapter I tonCampIns stcn sccuons as IOIIows
~describes non-timeltnucal ~moval actionJ in ~ladon 10 the SuperfwldAltalmued Cleup Model (SACM)
~ provuits an overvttw or dtc rtmoval proce$1=~~~-=aru=~~~de- Stale Md privlle
~ owlines lhe ~ availabkiOOSCsRPMs in conductinc ooa-dmeshycnlicll removal actions
~describe$ cnfortemcnt and C0$1 recovery actMdes
tf~c~~=ment and adminlanlive record requiremera
sampIIL1l dacribts Action Memonndum requimntnts for non-dmrltribcal removt~~CtMJU
(~~~~=~middotr=~~=shy~ro=ioc~~~~~=t~le forpubticYsvolwnat and taluaampa Md recommends the 1ppt0pn11e rapouc
~~ detcriba rouoq ~ kaalJ provtdes lftDmHM 01 bulltin IIOrl-tune-cndcal remoVIIIICtiOM tnl) be llppfOpfIQIamp and 01 ~ Epound1CA dctkJpment proccu
c
- J
r
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Smimtll dcscribes the purpose and con1ent of the EEICA Approval Memorandum
~explains ttwlht Exeeudve SuiMlary should provde I aencrll overview of the EECA
~~~~~i~~~=r~==~oo~~~re~ OIId weu risks posed by the site
ScsdDAli o~middottlines how to identify removaltction objecriva for the DOn-timemiddot cntical removal action
~clesltribcolhcprltXe$$1oridencifyina ondlllllyzinarltmoYII ICtioo alampauampiva
~describes how to~ removal a~ altenladva forcffeaivmas impampemenubtbty and rose
SalioliLU doscnbes -tocleoenninelhc roconuncadcd rltngtOYIIICtioo altttnllivc
pidlatc~~~~thllmiddotma~~~~===poacaoedlllhccood-ofalthsecdooofcbis~widgtmiddotliorofra-poacaoedia odiaAolcbis ~8-akcywonliadeaofusediacbis -~-aCOfiiIOIUooollhc EECIIproca~ond lhc romodial on lllldy (RIIFS) proceu ~ D _a model Nocice of IJecisMgto Not 10 IC Special Nocke Procedures
1 bull 1 THE IACM APPROACH s~=~~~~~-=r~1==-middot aaioftl t can be ied 10 a broed ~my of respouc aiou Spec16clll) SACM involveamp
A cooa ~ for tueaiDc si~especifk cooditionllnd the MOd for 001
~T-~==-plaoaina --or~oo~-~
~~~-o(~ SACM should bo mwdmd lor all S_rud acltivllies aoioftamp as imple- io
-wllh reqwe o( lhc NCP IIIII CEitltlA MtaiJ Swpaflond _ priorilia
-middot-~~n~==oa~cndoltht~mupp1gtCUOOIIdbetler--aiiSupetllnd__
-J
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
Uat of Acronymbull
AOC-Administrltive Order on Coosem
ARAIU-Appliablt or Relevant and Appropriaampe Requiremtnu
ARC5-AJtemuive Remedial Contractina Stratqy
ATSOR-Aaency for Toxic Substances and Disease ReJisuy
ATTIC-AJtenuldve Trtument Tcchnoloc lnfonnadon Center
CA-Coopcradve Apecment
CERCLA--CoheOJi Ellironmclllll Respoouc Compcasllioo and UabUily llaquot of 1980 uamcnded
CFR--Code or Federal Replllions
CLP--Coalnltt labonlofy llopam
CLU-IN--Cieanup lnr Bulktia Boon
CRP-Commuruty Rcllliofts Plan
()()()-l)eponm or or= DOE--Oeputmenc or Eaell
EEICA-E-rinc EJIIIIioogtColt Anllysis
Els-ampvuonmenul ~ s-meot
EPA-United S Enviroamcnall -ltion AaailtY
ERCS-EmerttntY ReiJIOI Cleanup Services
ERR$-EmetJltnlt~ and R~ Resporult Serviw
ERT--poundnviloo-I~T cFR-IederllllqiNr
L TCs--loolmiddot Tenn C-1Sonrqy
MCU-MWmum e-n Leve~ MCIClo--Mum~ Level Gooh
MOU--Manonndum or Undenandioamp -J NCP llllOOIIOolooclllaurdousSub~UoltaPoll-~ Plao
NPL---lJauoul Pnonucs Ust
~RT MIOOIOiileltpon1Teom
r
Lilt of Acronymbull (Continued)
OampM--Oper~~ion and Mainrenancc
OMB-Office or Manqemenl and Budaet
OPA-Ofrce o( Policy Analy5is
ORC-office of ReJional Counsel
ORO--OffiCe of Rtse3tth and Developmen1
0SC~-Sccne Coontinawr
OSWER-otlia ofSolid w and~~ PA-Preliminaoy Dl
PRP-IoknWIIy Responsible Piny
PRSC-Post-Removal She Control
QAIQC-Quolily AsAnnco~Quoily Conuol
RA--RJiooal Adminiscnooc
RRT- RqiONIR_T
RCRA-Raowa ConlaVIIion tnd Recovery Act
RDT--Recional Decision Team
RWS- RemcdiallnvesripaionFeuibility SNdy
ROO-a-t orDecislon
RPM--Remodiol Project Maollor SACM- spailnd Aca~ ap Model
SARA--ampoporfwld ~ ond ~A of 19ft
SI-Si10 l_ao
sm-superllld IMoO TcchnolotY EVIIUIIdoo
START-Sopnfmd Technial _ IIOd a_ TQII
TAT-Tedwal Assiscancc Team
TBC-To Be Coomdltml
TIO-Technolov IMovllioo orr UAO-UnilMrlt AdmmampStliWt Onltt
r
Llot of Acronymo (Continued)
USG5-Uniled Swes OcoloJical Survey
VISrrT- Vendor lnfonnalion System for Innovative Treauoeat Techn~oeies
VOC- Volllile Orionic Compound
- J
r
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The purpose of thiSJUidance is 10 provide infOITTialion on the procedures and ICtivitiellhe US EnvitonmeniAI Proceaion Aacncy (EPA) uses in conductinamp non-~-critical removal actioos
C~~Jo~H=u7su~=~il~=middot~~~~~~J~cgt ~rMMl~=~~~~~~is~~=~~~~~c= IOCMun tJUIMions and EPA policy
me~~~=~~~=~~~~i~7 conaua for how noa-tune~llell rtmovaiiCtioos fit wilhia the overall Supefflmd prosnm
Chapter I tonCampIns stcn sccuons as IOIIows
~describes non-timeltnucal ~moval actionJ in ~ladon 10 the SuperfwldAltalmued Cleup Model (SACM)
~ provuits an overvttw or dtc rtmoval proce$1=~~~-=aru=~~~de- Stale Md privlle
~ owlines lhe ~ availabkiOOSCsRPMs in conductinc ooa-dmeshycnlicll removal actions
~describe$ cnfortemcnt and C0$1 recovery actMdes
tf~c~~=ment and adminlanlive record requiremera
sampIIL1l dacribts Action Memonndum requimntnts for non-dmrltribcal removt~~CtMJU
(~~~~=~middotr=~~=shy~ro=ioc~~~~~=t~le forpubticYsvolwnat and taluaampa Md recommends the 1ppt0pn11e rapouc
~~ detcriba rouoq ~ kaalJ provtdes lftDmHM 01 bulltin IIOrl-tune-cndcal remoVIIIICtiOM tnl) be llppfOpfIQIamp and 01 ~ Epound1CA dctkJpment proccu
c
- J
r
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Smimtll dcscribes the purpose and con1ent of the EEICA Approval Memorandum
~explains ttwlht Exeeudve SuiMlary should provde I aencrll overview of the EECA
~~~~~i~~~=r~==~oo~~~re~ OIId weu risks posed by the site
ScsdDAli o~middottlines how to identify removaltction objecriva for the DOn-timemiddot cntical removal action
~clesltribcolhcprltXe$$1oridencifyina ondlllllyzinarltmoYII ICtioo alampauampiva
~describes how to~ removal a~ altenladva forcffeaivmas impampemenubtbty and rose
SalioliLU doscnbes -tocleoenninelhc roconuncadcd rltngtOYIIICtioo altttnllivc
pidlatc~~~~thllmiddotma~~~~===poacaoedlllhccood-ofalthsecdooofcbis~widgtmiddotliorofra-poacaoedia odiaAolcbis ~8-akcywonliadeaofusediacbis -~-aCOfiiIOIUooollhc EECIIproca~ond lhc romodial on lllldy (RIIFS) proceu ~ D _a model Nocice of IJecisMgto Not 10 IC Special Nocke Procedures
1 bull 1 THE IACM APPROACH s~=~~~~~-=r~1==-middot aaioftl t can be ied 10 a broed ~my of respouc aiou Spec16clll) SACM involveamp
A cooa ~ for tueaiDc si~especifk cooditionllnd the MOd for 001
~T-~==-plaoaina --or~oo~-~
~~~-o(~ SACM should bo mwdmd lor all S_rud acltivllies aoioftamp as imple- io
-wllh reqwe o( lhc NCP IIIII CEitltlA MtaiJ Swpaflond _ priorilia
-middot-~~n~==oa~cndoltht~mupp1gtCUOOIIdbetler--aiiSupetllnd__
-J
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
Lilt of Acronymbull (Continued)
OampM--Oper~~ion and Mainrenancc
OMB-Office or Manqemenl and Budaet
OPA-Ofrce o( Policy Analy5is
ORC-office of ReJional Counsel
ORO--OffiCe of Rtse3tth and Developmen1
0SC~-Sccne Coontinawr
OSWER-otlia ofSolid w and~~ PA-Preliminaoy Dl
PRP-IoknWIIy Responsible Piny
PRSC-Post-Removal She Control
QAIQC-Quolily AsAnnco~Quoily Conuol
RA--RJiooal Adminiscnooc
RRT- RqiONIR_T
RCRA-Raowa ConlaVIIion tnd Recovery Act
RDT--Recional Decision Team
RWS- RemcdiallnvesripaionFeuibility SNdy
ROO-a-t orDecislon
RPM--Remodiol Project Maollor SACM- spailnd Aca~ ap Model
SARA--ampoporfwld ~ ond ~A of 19ft
SI-Si10 l_ao
sm-superllld IMoO TcchnolotY EVIIUIIdoo
START-Sopnfmd Technial _ IIOd a_ TQII
TAT-Tedwal Assiscancc Team
TBC-To Be Coomdltml
TIO-Technolov IMovllioo orr UAO-UnilMrlt AdmmampStliWt Onltt
r
Llot of Acronymo (Continued)
USG5-Uniled Swes OcoloJical Survey
VISrrT- Vendor lnfonnalion System for Innovative Treauoeat Techn~oeies
VOC- Volllile Orionic Compound
- J
r
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The purpose of thiSJUidance is 10 provide infOITTialion on the procedures and ICtivitiellhe US EnvitonmeniAI Proceaion Aacncy (EPA) uses in conductinamp non-~-critical removal actioos
C~~Jo~H=u7su~=~il~=middot~~~~~~J~cgt ~rMMl~=~~~~~~is~~=~~~~~c= IOCMun tJUIMions and EPA policy
me~~~=~~~=~~~~i~7 conaua for how noa-tune~llell rtmovaiiCtioos fit wilhia the overall Supefflmd prosnm
Chapter I tonCampIns stcn sccuons as IOIIows
~describes non-timeltnucal ~moval actionJ in ~ladon 10 the SuperfwldAltalmued Cleup Model (SACM)
~ provuits an overvttw or dtc rtmoval proce$1=~~~-=aru=~~~de- Stale Md privlle
~ owlines lhe ~ availabkiOOSCsRPMs in conductinc ooa-dmeshycnlicll removal actions
~describe$ cnfortemcnt and C0$1 recovery actMdes
tf~c~~=ment and adminlanlive record requiremera
sampIIL1l dacribts Action Memonndum requimntnts for non-dmrltribcal removt~~CtMJU
(~~~~=~middotr=~~=shy~ro=ioc~~~~~=t~le forpubticYsvolwnat and taluaampa Md recommends the 1ppt0pn11e rapouc
~~ detcriba rouoq ~ kaalJ provtdes lftDmHM 01 bulltin IIOrl-tune-cndcal remoVIIIICtiOM tnl) be llppfOpfIQIamp and 01 ~ Epound1CA dctkJpment proccu
c
- J
r
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Smimtll dcscribes the purpose and con1ent of the EEICA Approval Memorandum
~explains ttwlht Exeeudve SuiMlary should provde I aencrll overview of the EECA
~~~~~i~~~=r~==~oo~~~re~ OIId weu risks posed by the site
ScsdDAli o~middottlines how to identify removaltction objecriva for the DOn-timemiddot cntical removal action
~clesltribcolhcprltXe$$1oridencifyina ondlllllyzinarltmoYII ICtioo alampauampiva
~describes how to~ removal a~ altenladva forcffeaivmas impampemenubtbty and rose
SalioliLU doscnbes -tocleoenninelhc roconuncadcd rltngtOYIIICtioo altttnllivc
pidlatc~~~~thllmiddotma~~~~===poacaoedlllhccood-ofalthsecdooofcbis~widgtmiddotliorofra-poacaoedia odiaAolcbis ~8-akcywonliadeaofusediacbis -~-aCOfiiIOIUooollhc EECIIproca~ond lhc romodial on lllldy (RIIFS) proceu ~ D _a model Nocice of IJecisMgto Not 10 IC Special Nocke Procedures
1 bull 1 THE IACM APPROACH s~=~~~~~-=r~1==-middot aaioftl t can be ied 10 a broed ~my of respouc aiou Spec16clll) SACM involveamp
A cooa ~ for tueaiDc si~especifk cooditionllnd the MOd for 001
~T-~==-plaoaina --or~oo~-~
~~~-o(~ SACM should bo mwdmd lor all S_rud acltivllies aoioftamp as imple- io
-wllh reqwe o( lhc NCP IIIII CEitltlA MtaiJ Swpaflond _ priorilia
-middot-~~n~==oa~cndoltht~mupp1gtCUOOIIdbetler--aiiSupetllnd__
-J
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
Llot of Acronymo (Continued)
USG5-Uniled Swes OcoloJical Survey
VISrrT- Vendor lnfonnalion System for Innovative Treauoeat Techn~oeies
VOC- Volllile Orionic Compound
- J
r
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The purpose of thiSJUidance is 10 provide infOITTialion on the procedures and ICtivitiellhe US EnvitonmeniAI Proceaion Aacncy (EPA) uses in conductinamp non-~-critical removal actioos
C~~Jo~H=u7su~=~il~=middot~~~~~~J~cgt ~rMMl~=~~~~~~is~~=~~~~~c= IOCMun tJUIMions and EPA policy
me~~~=~~~=~~~~i~7 conaua for how noa-tune~llell rtmovaiiCtioos fit wilhia the overall Supefflmd prosnm
Chapter I tonCampIns stcn sccuons as IOIIows
~describes non-timeltnucal ~moval actionJ in ~ladon 10 the SuperfwldAltalmued Cleup Model (SACM)
~ provuits an overvttw or dtc rtmoval proce$1=~~~-=aru=~~~de- Stale Md privlle
~ owlines lhe ~ availabkiOOSCsRPMs in conductinc ooa-dmeshycnlicll removal actions
~describe$ cnfortemcnt and C0$1 recovery actMdes
tf~c~~=ment and adminlanlive record requiremera
sampIIL1l dacribts Action Memonndum requimntnts for non-dmrltribcal removt~~CtMJU
(~~~~=~middotr=~~=shy~ro=ioc~~~~~=t~le forpubticYsvolwnat and taluaampa Md recommends the 1ppt0pn11e rapouc
~~ detcriba rouoq ~ kaalJ provtdes lftDmHM 01 bulltin IIOrl-tune-cndcal remoVIIIICtiOM tnl) be llppfOpfIQIamp and 01 ~ Epound1CA dctkJpment proccu
c
- J
r
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Smimtll dcscribes the purpose and con1ent of the EEICA Approval Memorandum
~explains ttwlht Exeeudve SuiMlary should provde I aencrll overview of the EECA
~~~~~i~~~=r~==~oo~~~re~ OIId weu risks posed by the site
ScsdDAli o~middottlines how to identify removaltction objecriva for the DOn-timemiddot cntical removal action
~clesltribcolhcprltXe$$1oridencifyina ondlllllyzinarltmoYII ICtioo alampauampiva
~describes how to~ removal a~ altenladva forcffeaivmas impampemenubtbty and rose
SalioliLU doscnbes -tocleoenninelhc roconuncadcd rltngtOYIIICtioo altttnllivc
pidlatc~~~~thllmiddotma~~~~===poacaoedlllhccood-ofalthsecdooofcbis~widgtmiddotliorofra-poacaoedia odiaAolcbis ~8-akcywonliadeaofusediacbis -~-aCOfiiIOIUooollhc EECIIproca~ond lhc romodial on lllldy (RIIFS) proceu ~ D _a model Nocice of IJecisMgto Not 10 IC Special Nocke Procedures
1 bull 1 THE IACM APPROACH s~=~~~~~-=r~1==-middot aaioftl t can be ied 10 a broed ~my of respouc aiou Spec16clll) SACM involveamp
A cooa ~ for tueaiDc si~especifk cooditionllnd the MOd for 001
~T-~==-plaoaina --or~oo~-~
~~~-o(~ SACM should bo mwdmd lor all S_rud acltivllies aoioftamp as imple- io
-wllh reqwe o( lhc NCP IIIII CEitltlA MtaiJ Swpaflond _ priorilia
-middot-~~n~==oa~cndoltht~mupp1gtCUOOIIdbetler--aiiSupetllnd__
-J
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The purpose of thiSJUidance is 10 provide infOITTialion on the procedures and ICtivitiellhe US EnvitonmeniAI Proceaion Aacncy (EPA) uses in conductinamp non-~-critical removal actioos
C~~Jo~H=u7su~=~il~=middot~~~~~~J~cgt ~rMMl~=~~~~~~is~~=~~~~~c= IOCMun tJUIMions and EPA policy
me~~~=~~~=~~~~i~7 conaua for how noa-tune~llell rtmovaiiCtioos fit wilhia the overall Supefflmd prosnm
Chapter I tonCampIns stcn sccuons as IOIIows
~describes non-timeltnucal ~moval actionJ in ~ladon 10 the SuperfwldAltalmued Cleup Model (SACM)
~ provuits an overvttw or dtc rtmoval proce$1=~~~-=aru=~~~de- Stale Md privlle
~ owlines lhe ~ availabkiOOSCsRPMs in conductinc ooa-dmeshycnlicll removal actions
~describe$ cnfortemcnt and C0$1 recovery actMdes
tf~c~~=ment and adminlanlive record requiremera
sampIIL1l dacribts Action Memonndum requimntnts for non-dmrltribcal removt~~CtMJU
(~~~~=~middotr=~~=shy~ro=ioc~~~~~=t~le forpubticYsvolwnat and taluaampa Md recommends the 1ppt0pn11e rapouc
~~ detcriba rouoq ~ kaalJ provtdes lftDmHM 01 bulltin IIOrl-tune-cndcal remoVIIIICtiOM tnl) be llppfOpfIQIamp and 01 ~ Epound1CA dctkJpment proccu
c
- J
r
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Smimtll dcscribes the purpose and con1ent of the EEICA Approval Memorandum
~explains ttwlht Exeeudve SuiMlary should provde I aencrll overview of the EECA
~~~~~i~~~=r~==~oo~~~re~ OIId weu risks posed by the site
ScsdDAli o~middottlines how to identify removaltction objecriva for the DOn-timemiddot cntical removal action
~clesltribcolhcprltXe$$1oridencifyina ondlllllyzinarltmoYII ICtioo alampauampiva
~describes how to~ removal a~ altenladva forcffeaivmas impampemenubtbty and rose
SalioliLU doscnbes -tocleoenninelhc roconuncadcd rltngtOYIIICtioo altttnllivc
pidlatc~~~~thllmiddotma~~~~===poacaoedlllhccood-ofalthsecdooofcbis~widgtmiddotliorofra-poacaoedia odiaAolcbis ~8-akcywonliadeaofusediacbis -~-aCOfiiIOIUooollhc EECIIproca~ond lhc romodial on lllldy (RIIFS) proceu ~ D _a model Nocice of IJecisMgto Not 10 IC Special Nocke Procedures
1 bull 1 THE IACM APPROACH s~=~~~~~-=r~1==-middot aaioftl t can be ied 10 a broed ~my of respouc aiou Spec16clll) SACM involveamp
A cooa ~ for tueaiDc si~especifk cooditionllnd the MOd for 001
~T-~==-plaoaina --or~oo~-~
~~~-o(~ SACM should bo mwdmd lor all S_rud acltivllies aoioftamp as imple- io
-wllh reqwe o( lhc NCP IIIII CEitltlA MtaiJ Swpaflond _ priorilia
-middot-~~n~==oa~cndoltht~mupp1gtCUOOIIdbetler--aiiSupetllnd__
-J
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Smimtll dcscribes the purpose and con1ent of the EEICA Approval Memorandum
~explains ttwlht Exeeudve SuiMlary should provde I aencrll overview of the EECA
~~~~~i~~~=r~==~oo~~~re~ OIId weu risks posed by the site
ScsdDAli o~middottlines how to identify removaltction objecriva for the DOn-timemiddot cntical removal action
~clesltribcolhcprltXe$$1oridencifyina ondlllllyzinarltmoYII ICtioo alampauampiva
~describes how to~ removal a~ altenladva forcffeaivmas impampemenubtbty and rose
SalioliLU doscnbes -tocleoenninelhc roconuncadcd rltngtOYIIICtioo altttnllivc
pidlatc~~~~thllmiddotma~~~~===poacaoedlllhccood-ofalthsecdooofcbis~widgtmiddotliorofra-poacaoedia odiaAolcbis ~8-akcywonliadeaofusediacbis -~-aCOfiiIOIUooollhc EECIIproca~ond lhc romodial on lllldy (RIIFS) proceu ~ D _a model Nocice of IJecisMgto Not 10 IC Special Nocke Procedures
1 bull 1 THE IACM APPROACH s~=~~~~~-=r~1==-middot aaioftl t can be ied 10 a broed ~my of respouc aiou Spec16clll) SACM involveamp
A cooa ~ for tueaiDc si~especifk cooditionllnd the MOd for 001
~T-~==-plaoaina --or~oo~-~
~~~-o(~ SACM should bo mwdmd lor all S_rud acltivllies aoioftamp as imple- io
-wllh reqwe o( lhc NCP IIIII CEitltlA MtaiJ Swpaflond _ priorilia
-middot-~~n~==oa~cndoltht~mupp1gtCUOOIIdbetler--aiiSupetllnd__
-J
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
1 1 THE SACM APPROACH (CONTINUED)
SACM CRC0W31CS EPA Reaions 1ocxplore new ways to LI5C removal authorities under the NCP to achieve prompc risk rtduction An imcjrlled removal and remedial silt tJllnllement stn~car under SACM will most likely involve the incre~ use of DOnmiddottime-criticalremoval tuthorit) 10 Khieve prompc risk ~uction at Superfund sites Reaional DeciJioa Teams (ROTs) 1 SACM concept introduced in OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Number 5 SACM Rejional Decisions- Interim Guidance (December 1992) PB93-96266 bull antid~ to emphasize cuiy actions such as non-time-aiticalcemoval actions without jeopardizmalhe
x~rwt~middot~~=r~~i~ ~~7e~n~~~~~~an con1ext or non-timelt ritlcal removal actions this mew thai oppvrt~S for treatment and permanence sllould be fully cvahwed in the EEICA where appropriate (sec Chapter 2)
For More Information
I OS WER Publialioa 92031-0ll Volu me I Numben 1-l (OCmber 1992) bull Stws of Key SACM Progrun ManaatmeDl Wua-lncerim Guidance
PB93-96Jl62 Early Actioa and LonampmiddotTenn Action UDder SACM- lniCrim Ouidancc PB93-96Jl63 Enf0ltttrnot11 Undet SACM-Inwint Guidooce P893-963264 Aueuinamp Sica Under SACM- lnterim GuidMce P893middot963265 SACM Rt DeciJion Tcorns-bllaun Gwdanlte PB93-96J266
2 g~~~~-i~~~~~~IINPLSioes 3 OSWER Plbliadon 9203103 Guidance on lmplementlliono(the
Supafund Acaterd Clearlup Model (SACM) under CERCIA ond he NCP
bull g5til 1~J~39~l~~~3A Exerti~bull Fluibillty 1vwalllhc Superfund Accclerllcd Cleanup Model (SA~) (Octobcr26 1992) PB93 shy96l2l3
S 3~A~~-~~m~)j~~)~l~~~~~tcdRespoueAttiOIII
1 2 OVIIIVIIW OF THE REIIOVAL ACTION PIIOCISI
CERCLA tnd lht NCP ddinc ranovalactions 10 iaclude lhpound cUwp or ttrnwal ol dead hlzlrdous substances ampom lht envirorunenl such aaions M INY ~y be tlkea ia lht cvca~ o( lhc thral of ttlee of hazardous subiclacet into the cavitoameat such aaions as may be ~ 10 monitor assess Md cvIUIIIIt the tt~ or dftal of ttlellc ol hazardous subsltances lhc dospooal of - -rial or he _ ofsuch oda ottions 11 Ybe neccssuy to ~- mininUt or damqe ta lhc p4ligtljc health or Mit or to be envuooment whtch may Olherwite ~It ampom a ttat or dftal o( ttlcate EPA bM CllllqOiizled mnovW tctiOftl tn three wa) emeramcy drnt-criticll and noa-cunea~bcal biKd on lhc rypcol Pt the fY and tllrell of the ~eaoc or potcnllal tdcue ond he time fnrne in htch the ICtiOn must be ~nitaalcd Emeraency tnd bme-cniJCIJ ttmcwalaioftl mpond to rdtws ~tnnJ ICtJOn v utun 6 months nonmiddottn~-ati~Ca temovtl aroont rapond 10 ttJeases rtquiMJ action 1hx aan san later than 6 monchs af1cr the ltktmnampnauon M artSpOMC 11
-J
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
~~h~~at=~===middote~~~~remoU octioosldentificd ia IltCtion J0041S(bX2XiHrul orlhe NCP
Prevention or abalemcnt of actual or pocendal exposWC to nearbyhuman populadons aoimals or the food chain from hazatdous substances polluliiMS or contaminants
Prevention or abalemcnt or actual or potential concamlnadon of drinkina w~~er supplies or sensitive ecosystems
Stlbiliwion or elimin81ion or hampzardoUJ substances In dnmw blmls tanks or other bulk sconce containers that may pose a tRil of ~1we
Trcwnenc or eliminatioa of hiP levels ofhazardous substiDOcl pollutanu or conwninanu in soils larJely ac or near the swf1ce lhat may mipw
Miaimiralon or elimination of the effects o( weMher concHdons dw may ca hazardous suD5WKleS pollutanlS laquo concaminMts to milt or 10 be ldeascd
Eimillllice of~ of fire or explosion
~~o~=ipptOprillemmlorSwcfC5901lst
rr~~=a~~~orraonlhll rmype dlaatopbtie OscntiMs always coosidetsettioo 300415 ia ~lhe ~ olllldq
lCal=-==~~1=~~1~-iiJusuwl the noa-tinwltrilical mmval aaion proccu
The foliowifta seep~ for IKMHimc-critical removal aiocls
Section 300410 of the NCP outliDa lhe prooeu forcond=allle
=--middot~i~~~~PA-oo-ya=t- ooldeooirylhe_-loldle -0lt--andiO_Iho_IOpublielooaldldle ollho-aodlhorx acasaryiO--Iho aoed - shyTIIe-PAalsodotermiiiOiif__ ls_IO__ rdnlc such bull otr-sitr or OftmiddotSile C ofcondidoM -d tfBft
=-=-~~hdgt~-lorshyo~lrC~oc=~~shybullalnllllollhoEEICAproceubullditawcdiaCIIajgtler2 Tlles-shyoclecnoooflhe~-Gmado~alhoMlt_
J
-J
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
-EXHIBIT 1
Non-Time~rlt iell Removel Action Procett
--
--J
___~~ecc-bullbullr- u-~bullbull
JIIMI
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
12 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
e~~~for~Mtorud~lssreSrY~C crirical removal action has been determined~ memorandum serves three iJni)OfWIt functions Fint the mpoundlllOBMium is used to secure manqcmcott= Utunum~d ~~~r~i~~i ~r~~=~uU~proposed ~t~~=~~~~~=~~~~~nr~ ~~) r~~vies~=~irc~=o~ltdoa is
All EEJCA must be compampcted ror all non-time-criDcal removal actions bull ~
=O~~~~~theNCmiddotn~middot~t~~ uocdooUCylheseolgtjccti lorcoscefcaiIICIIoodimpk1110111aboliy While M EEJCA is limillr to the RLIFS conduaed for rtmtdiaiiCbOftS k is kss ~ The AltUon Memorlndwo a he EEICA WCAs CllOiodaed CERaA secooa IOlt(bXI) INCtiel Thmforo EpoundICA counetd aowwd the S2 million scawtory limit 011 rcmovaiiCtiOOI
A public no0lte dncribin1 the EEICA ( Cllopcr2) llld annoonciq 1 polllc
rCOO~=Jmiddot~~=~oecon~IUc- the admiaislnOYlt oeconlrequiro_ Ia oecdon 100110 olthe NCP The EpoundICA ~ pon of the admialJltndYlt oeconllilc IOd bull sllbjecl 10 the public cotnnltlll 1M convntnl mpouc ~tneftll for the admiailtnrive record
For More lnformetlon
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
7
1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE REMOVAL ACTION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
sect300 I SO Worter Heal d and Safetysect300160 Documenwion and Cost Recovery ~~J~~~rJS~e~~ Rcqu~mcnts ror Response Operatioru sect300820 Administrutive Record File foro Removal Action
l e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~r~~r~~J~~~~ile 4 OSWER Publiaoltioo 928l l~l SWldanl Opelllina Safety Guides (June
1992) PB92-96l414 l OSWER Publiaoltioo 92858-02 Helilll and Safety Audic Guideliael SARA
Tide I Secuoo 126(0Cmber 1989) EPA~-891010 PB90-204ll7
~C~~gtI(~~-~~=u~lW69fS)SIlttll OSWER PublicaDoa 9J600-12A finnl G 011 lmpklllioo of die Consisltncy ~co die SUNcory luriu oo RemoYIII Acllolw (lone 12 1989) PB90-27446lCCE
Ia ~=~=--J~~~~~=SIIIUltOiyUmoooo OSWER Publicorioo 93600-18 Removal Propm Pnonties CMalaquoll 31 19U) PB91 -~
I 0 OSWER PublicaDoa 93602~ AudloriDUOIC lor Repooai Admioiocnlorngt ~~~~ NPLSices (lebnuwy 24 1992~
II 29 CFR 11910120 HAZWOPER Roooas 12 40CFRPonlii Worterlroocccioo
1 3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Because of 1he WJency of emeracncy and limrltritiCfl temoval actions EPA OSCampIRPMI or US eoo a-d OSCs ly die lead lorCOIIIIucdaa or o-u-middot For DOHbull~ te~NgtVIIUO i1 ~MY be -opribull for che Stile 10 like lhe td ia
~=~r=r=-=~~-=shy- rordloi~~Dsuoco
1D cIIT)inaouc bull non-timeltriOcal mnoval acdon cht OSCIRPM direcu or ~views die wortc ofcxher PIIPI ood coocrocconco eomptiance widgt CEilaA IOd die NO vw 111 cleasioo _ rorcemenc - wortcploos- oil or EPAIoodo oodchlcolllllllwortciJIampoodle-koowoico--llldsUolty proced Thelollowooaoecooobrienyliotcrilgta dlecypaof~-cooooshycwe~ raoovllaaons
Regional Decision Team
ll~=~=~ceorbullsACM~= COOfdlnalton communauoft and uUtpabOn of Superfund fiiOIRIIIIUthonl) n IC$OWttl and 1()01) For ftOIImiddottuneltntd rtmovAIICtiOns the ROT should lJitbull M~aS~DIIhl
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
~Zt~u=~thtJ~~~~=~ actions are timeltritial or non-dmr-aitical or whether the site rcqulra remedialiCdoa ROT involvement in emerpncy removal action and the more timeltritical removal action decisionmiddot makinamp may be Umited based on the time available before WtiatinriCtion Also ROT lnvol~ in removal assessments and decision-makina may vary from Reaion 10 ReJioa
State Involvement
Pursuant tO 40 CFR s~ 0 sectioa 356200 when I pianmua period or~ than 6
=ev=~r~s~=~rJt=Y=~re perocipate in condiiCbq andor 6nanaally supportina a Fund-At non-dme-ailicalemoval OCiion lhe ROT should linl detamine lhe ll of die siNIIioo and dlen depeodiac oo die
=~~ik~~e~~~~~-f1w=~~ C~ eumpioas ampom die S2 mallioo removal limit 11 shes DOl on the Natioul
Pottntlelly Aeapontlble Party (PRP) Involvement
Oac of EPA s primary objectives for ~ny Superfund ICdon is to haw lhe pldia =fordle-of--bo-fordle_ CiRaA
rapt)~ ~Aa~undu~IO==eae~ --pcnNta~periodofll-6-lllmislimeforshya-iAa before lhe wn of onmiddotsice activity At with ocba mnovals the OSCIRPM ahocdd weft wilb ReponIICChNcal enforeetne~K suff lO idcndfy PRPs iMia aaiORI to obcaia PltP ~ and conchact nqodltioalto enter imo setdement apeements (see scction 15)
Rttpontlblllty for PoltmiddotAtmovtl lite Control (PASC)
Ia tomt cMeS PllSCuvilia will be aeceuy toeuurt tbc coodDtaiDc efllcd_ola----oaioo Eumplooof- tt=- poshyreplocill(-toolloaioc-middot ~-policylor shy_ __ __t_ylooaPRSCil y-by
~~~middot~=or~=orm mpOIIr~~~~ttrloio=-Metnor- olU~ (MOUJ m s- or locll Ifhe OSCI1lPM il Uftlblcoo obWo tudt movol options iiiOI concin PRSC lilould bo IYCMdcd Whcrt other option~ 1ft bsibampe
ca
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
13 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
1 4 RESOURCES
A number or resources can provide ttthniltal asslstMoe to the lead IF8CY carryiq ow a non-dtnemiddoteruical removalaion Jbm include nMiooal RePgtna~ and spcdaliud rapoose IUITII COflUICtOR olhtr federal qencies Md Stale lftd kxaJ aovmunna Seaioe 300 1bull5 of tht CP dtscnbcs speaal teams and other cwistaDcc avaUabk to OSCsiRPMs
9242 J~i~v~nc~middot~rbullcn~OSe 5r~ lt~~gt~~~=licalioe Re view Reconvne~2] (AuFt 199f)) PB~27382kCE provldu OS~ ===~~=~=~~~C~~~=e~o~ud1UWJY provi4ct a rold nwp 10 Superfund conuactor support The LTCS anricipllcd mill) of lht undert)int princirlet o( SACM For e~ lhe iaault ill ~f Ktioe IUpOftiiS will be lided by t1te oewly cr-d Ente1ltftC) ttnd Rapid~ Savka (ERRS)- l1te LlCS ttlso con-sitottndremovoltochoical_fwtttiotts uodetJiaPSwpaftood Tedtokol__ood~Teom(STAllT)- llteLlCSeoUiooo tlte
t~middot==-~~rJ~1R=== etltiyttndlotta-temtttaionsuodetSACM llteproceuoltelopioatbesettndodleroew conncu hll bcpD lftCI will coadoue over lhe next xvatl yan consllltnl wktl the pte-il of SACM
CliUTtfld a nnecy ofcoarnctor raourccs is aYiillt to OSCsiRPMs OSWEll Publ 9 ~ -c-xu lftd S Guido to tlte Supafiutd Propm (May 19911 EPAISI00middot911012 PRmiddot92JIiJu avatlable comnctor fumltn eadl Rqioo aod tNhwMhWs 10 COfCaaiOr inlonnltaoa Oft aVIillbk conncu
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
1 4 RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
15 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY
PAP -ell ond lclendficoltlon
EPAtxpecu mucboftbecarlysilltMICUmeDtICtivitia to be FUDd-ampad Howroer
~~==-~~==r~~~wtbull Ulellmllll procca fnl) requift dw thr cafoncrneat lelia work lad devole IDOfe __ 10PlP-ondldeaciftCidoaoortyind11_ ThismayloodtocbooaainPRPshyhodoioiY ond - middotlas timo 10 complete d1l PAP IOIIdllillot d1l - middot -
Notlco L-1
ForlialeltrilicoloodcytemltMI-dlllialeoaobitoOgt--shyIdividooubcliaoiootlood--osutypicollybclaoodyOgtIIOiilydlo PRPvlilo --lilbililyw10_ioformol- ----y-bmol ~-=~=~r-==-=e pncticablt llllics olsudt proadula wwld-- die Afltoqalbility to_ a = ia bull upcclitioul miDIXr Whra decidillc the~ ofuampiaJ CERQA accU co~~~~=ty~-~~
lsso(dleCERCIAtteetioa 122(c)opoaaiooticcletooracna60-to 1raquo4ay mor~~onumOAonmiddotSI~~actJvsuesandcrCERCLAIlaquoUUOI04(a)eecl~~-
~-=~=~~11~X1)(~to-~-
10
J
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
additional studies or investiptions authorized Wider section 104(b) dwina the ncaotilltioa period Since EfJCAs are considered CERCLA section 104(b) scudics p~parMion of the EEJCA may continue duri nt the momorium Under this moratorium If the PRPdoes ncx provide EPA with a 1ood faith offer the monuorium ends after 60 days
Whenever EPA decides to roceao use of CERQA section 122(e) special notice proccdutts CERCLA section 122(1) requira EPA to DOtify the PRP in writina of the rusons why
=P~~~o~1~~~~~~0in~~~~=l~~ppendix 0
PRP Nogotlollon
PTtJina certain documem before nqouadoas enswes ttr EPA will enrer neJOtiiDoas with 1wcU-delined plu for PRP or qency ~- One of the pis of neJOCiadOM il ~
~7ro~~~~~middot~~==middot~a ~~~rJt=~~~tNtanon~~=~OO should be Ween the Rqion coWd bullJOCiate an ordcr with rhc PRPs for dte EFJCA IOd iaclude the evenNampl non-umrltntieaJ ~movalaction 111 theorduunderCERaAsecdon 1015auctoriry
For noncJmeadeal rcmovai iCdons sutfidcat lime is usually lllll1lbie 110 ~ conscnt-reenwnu wilh the PRP However ifche PRPdoes DCKIUpoad 110 DOCia Kam or refuses to SIP an AOC EPA has the auchorit) 10 proceed with a FUIKImiddotad rapoue or under CEROA section 106 wbtrc an Lmminenc ud ~~ ewato issue 1
Unilaral Adrninisudve Order (UAO) IUiuiriaa a PRP 10 perform the mMYIIIICdoa
inos~~~ln~~vZuf~~~r~JSt~-~ ~~~=~=~PB96=~bc=~~~~~lor =~~lt~r~~e~=middot==~~ero After compicUftamplhe EEICA die ROT cu clecido booed oo-- PRPdolaoo- PRP pWciplbon in CODdaiCtiac che IOnmiddotdme-aiticll ~ actioe
Cobullt Recovery
The MMU~C of limiwions for cost rteOYery roc ~movaltctionl ill yes trora m ~~~=~~-==-rr-=-~--1 lunnancm is 6 yran from the dale of rhc llll cumpdon) AcoasUampcncy cxtmpcioa may be soup
~~ec=~=r~-~1~=-=-lmpletliiOII oflhl CooliswlcyEle-10 lhe Slalucory Umia oo ReniiiVII AmoM [1shy12 1919) P890-27-6YCCE) EPAspastCOSISshollldbesouahlll __ell PRPl
~~~~_oM~=lanns~~a~nyen11 RltIOII~ C011MOI (ORC)
I I
co
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
1 5 ENFORCEMENT AND COST RECOVERY (CONTINUED)
For More lnform1tton
11 PUBUC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECOIID
ol~lt~=re-j~tamp
12
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
11 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (C ONTINUED)
Public involvcmen1 aeciviDes in Superfund promote cof1UTIIIIlicadon between membcn of the
~~~in~b~~~~~~~~~~~J~~tgtetfoJ~= ~fJ~Cru~~u as 1olhe lcctuUc3l action schedule
Sectioo 113(k)(2) of CERQA providea for involvina conununides affected by response
~~U~~=~===e=u=ccnk~=removal and remedill ruponses
Since remo-1 octions Uy quidtly lhuc is lea lime plan or pubUe
~==v~p=~~==~middotlj(m)lad300120oflbc
COIMgtI4iry relalioas oaivitieo--ltlesipcd 10 _die lnflln1lldoo- oflhe community IAampO tbe communicaDons IPPfth laquo eommuniry tdMions Pbull fortbe Admin11tr1rlve mord lctJVi~ped to chron~ the bud for the rapMSe selccoon and scrve a a yendUde for publtc pltlkipcoa in the ~movaliCdoo
Community R_etione Requlremente
The NCP and CERQA oudiDe a vwidy ofcomnuairy reladons ~uiremenu to prornoee CORVaiWcalion The rouowiotbull ~ for nonmiddotdmtltridcal renxwa1 acdons
sectehhsb lnfqmwipn Rcmntpry The ID(omwkla tepoatory DUll be eltlbtilhcd no -clhonlhe- oflheEFJCA Apflnwol-( ~2~
~====~~file IS ndudcd m rht repoulOfy
Pmuk Pabtpound Ngpcr riAvpiabln WEFJCA A puNk r10tKC ~the AJCttn s prdftmf 2itcma11W ud EEICA nM~Iu (see Olaptu 2) lftd IWlftOWiaiC
ll
-J
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
I I
1 I PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
its availability for ttview and convnent must be published in a major local newspaper The EEJCA is pan of the adminisaadve tecon1 file
Admlnletratlvt Record Requirements
The administrative retard file a subset of the site file is the body ofdocumeau EPA uSes to form the basis for the stlectioa of a ttsponse It should not be confUsed with the ldminlsndve record which as not complete Ulllila mponse ICtion hu been teAected The ldmlnilntive ~
~V~~wsU~Ortt~~ioie~~=re~~~ts IlaquoMICampI r and- rltllcct ofhe public includinamp PRPs
~~~J~~=~~-=xrea~== ~~~~~~-=~~~~n~ The tmuaiscndve record clola OKC the decisioa docwncnr ia lhe cue ofa naa-cime-aiticampl ttmoval K1JOil chi Acooa Mcnxnftdum b saped The record wdl rcoptn i(ft Acboa Memonndum II amended The~ ldmuuscrabve rtCOnl ectlYibeS b noaoWneltndcaJ removii~CCMX~S bull
Pyhli Nqiq pi Ayailabjljry oflhc MnioiMrlibull BtqMII FUc A public DOtioe musc be published when the EfJCA is plKtd in die ldmWIIrMivc ~ file IDd is availlbk fotcomnaL ActdicioampaUy irlht nocicc also ilwedtoiMOUOCC apublic
ltC~rz=laO~ =-=-~r-~~ HoW rtalk ~ Ppjg4 For DOe-timccridcal ttmovl K1ioM the NCP
=~o-~~--y~ - --)bulldlettmclhoEampAis==filrpWiitshy
14
co co
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
l
16 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
I CERCLA ll13(kX2) Panicipauon Proccduns 2 NCP
sect30041S(m) Community Relations in Removal Actions sect30081 0 Conampcnts of the AdminiwWve Record FUe sect300820 Adminisntive Record FtJe for a Removal Action
1 ~r~~ca12~~~~=~~W~ueSC A Hondboollt (loouwy 1992) EPA540111-921009 P892-963341
4 OSWERIublicaloon93603-1ll SupetflndRCI1IOYII~ llnicipllioo GltDdonclt for On-Scene Coonliooogtneonvaicy ReloDoos ond the Adminiluab-e Record (June 1992) P892-963416 OSWERIub6oonoa98333A-I FinoiGIDdooceooAdmloillnliReconls for SeleaioooCERCLA RespooseAaions (DeaINgteltJ 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE OSWER lublicooon 91360-I A Communicy Roololions Ourilgta En Acav10a -d Otmiddote~ of the AdnUasultiw Reconr(NoYembcr 3 1911) P891 -139l191CCE
1 7 ACTION MEMORANDUM
ll
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
EXHIBIT 2 Action Memorendum Outline
I Purpost
II Site Conditions and Backarouod A Si1e Oescripcion
1 Removal si1e evalLWion 2 Physicatlocarioa 3 Si lC characteristics 4 Rcltatt orthrealened re~ inco the envlrocvnent ofa hazardous
substance or poUucant or contaminiOI l NPLSIOLIS 6 Mapo pcau~ and IIJiphilt repmenlllionoOther Actions I Previous ICtions 2 Cumo~ICtioas
C Stale and LAxal Abullchorilies Roles 1 Sllldloalroosooshy2 llgtcenlial forCOCliUwcdSIIfOIIocal _
Ill Til to hWk H~ or Wtlte or tiM EoYI_t
~~~~ -NlOC~~~=~rlda 8 1braa 10 lhc Environment
IV EodaaetrtDtat Dtt~r-ludoa (see pqe 16 of Action MelnOIIDCkua Gbullidaftce)
VII OtataDdioa hUcy lslues
VIII EDiercH~tal
I X RlaquoobullbulltadaUoa [ofwnbulleot Addedubull
Altachbulltnts
Q54poundl_tMGJOI ~~M_~ _oo-shyU)eabulllllfi M t lP~9MJ)I NfOHUTl
16
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
I r I
17 ACTION MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
For More lnformbulltlon
OSWER Publiaa~ion 93603-01 S uperfund RemovAl Proceduns-Action Memorandum Guidanct (December 1990) EPA54(W9Qt004 PB9Q27447l
11 ON-SCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS
rcmovaJ~~i~~~~=~~e~~cruy~-=1eam(RRT) the OSCIRP~f muse submit to the RRT a complete ~port oa the removal openDon 00 the dons taken Acopy of the rc pon musa also be sent 10 tJw Seatwy of dv NlliOtW Respoase Team (NRT) The repon shall reconllhe situauon as it developed tht actiON takmlhe laOUttes commiocd and the probkms encounte~
Thcrt Is an established (OITna[ for OSC reporu set out in KCtion 300165 of the NCP Tbe tq)Oit muse contain the followbullnr
Summary of Events----t chronoloJial umdve of aB evencs includinr
Locarion of the hazardous substance Cause of the dischattc or release lnitill siruaion Effons to obtain response by responsible parties OrJanizadon of the response inc ludina Sta~e panicipationResources convnincd
~and~~==~MdeffonsiO~ or teiiOft damaaed nlhlrll raouna
-dra=~punucdllldligtllowalPublic informIOorVcommuify rtlldONICbYIies
EITtcuveocss of rcmovaiiCtions tmn by
Rcsjgtoosltblc pany(ics) Sandlocal Fc~m~ and special ContnaaOB pnvate poupslftd ~llnltell (if~KIbW)
Officuha encounttml-t hst of Items lflilll atfcacd the rtSpOMt wldl pwciculyen 111entt0t1 to wun oflnttfJOCmmcnW coordlnlb()ft
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
-I r
11 ONmiddotSCENE COORDINATOR REPORTS (CONTINUED)
Recof1Ulltodalions iocludinc
Means to preYCnt bull mwrencc of the dischltp or reate Improvement of respoosc actions
~~=~~~~cn~~~ ~O~~~~=~arraJM)nseplans
c
II
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
CHAPTER 2
CONDUCTING THE ENGINEERING EVALUATIONCOST ANALYSIS (EEICA)
2 1 OVERVIEW
Satisfy envVOMICftlal review rtquitemeru for removtl-=bonl
Salisly admWscrMh-e mord ftiQUlftIMIO ror imptomiddottd docwnentadon o( removal aaioo sdccuoo
Provide a ampwnewort for evalAMina Md sdectina ahemldve leehnolocies
Non -time-aidcal renI)VIIactiofts wiU be the apprtlpiile IUpODIC for a varic(y o( sites IDd will raqc ia scope from smlll-laquoaaelow-cos~aions to complicaKd ~-media rapoa1e aOou equlrina cxtrnpDOftlliom the scawcory ome lndlor dollar limit1 Non-cirne-critical removal acrioAs may be irurim or final actions they may be the fn and only ICtion 11 a site or ant of a ~tries of pUnned response aaiou The JCOpC of the non-timecridcal removal ICdon will detenninc the detail of the EfJCA The EEICA is a ftuible docwncntllilored to tbe scope Ps and objectives of me DOn-timemiddotaidcal removal action It should conca ()DIy thole diu necaury to JU~ the seleecioa or tlapOMC alleiMdve and rely upon exildn1 documentation whenever pou1blc
The IMampc of sHe c~ atrectint W non-rimeltrirical mnovalactioa f01m1a continuum AI one end art ana where the DOIHime-crilical rcrmv ICdoo il amphe first Md only
=~~~~~=_=M~~~ pmeeeed by lhe she At the ocher end oflht continuum are siles whcft the DOftmiddotdme-aidcaJ removalecuoa is one ot aseries ol mponsc Dons where acompleced RJ ts or will be aVIiWJampc
=~~~~lhise_~~W~U=J=mc IIIOiysis ofpempo or-~ lifltmodlllld proYgtdinc nfaenltciOcxiJtioa illfonnlbOft OQ the laiUft llld WCtll of~ and nsu
Many noa-time-cnbCII rerDMIIdions may occur bull Sltes wllh ~ da fall
=~-_~===~fictremoval shoukt bcblled 01 dlerelevw faaalis) l1sted Lateetionsl0041S(b)(=vbullii)o(lht NCP The relevant feaors sftould be atcd ampa lht EEICA ApprovW Memorwlum bull Uitificarioa forawfuctlnalhe EEICA Tht scopr of the rwn tlka UMo account rwo ~con~dcncioas the physJcll pon1on ofrhc mt 10 be lddrustd and whether lht actJOn rqwnenu bull rtnaJ or 1n1Crim
p tO ud lddm~nabull ~ICUlar tltPQ5Utc parhv-ay
19 j
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--r
21 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
consist~~=r~~~~cxr=~~n~sctithees~ =~=i~uS~~~~~~~~aafon50ob=~~~fti~~~~ the contamin~ts orconcern and exposure nxne(s) and teCtpcOCs)
The scope of the nonmiddotdmrcrirical rcmovlll action (ea an interim action eonduciCd duriaa an onaolna remedial cffon)and the specifiC objectives determine the information co be coUected durinamp the EEJCA Accorditfly quaJiwive risk inforrnauon lhll idendra pUways ofconcem and conoenncions ofconWNAMCS above lllftdlrdl could have beer xwntnttd bull the duriac the Rl and maybe refemd to in the EEICA a sep11111e ruk UICUmenc il DOC neeaAr) 10 suppoctthe notHimecntical removal ICtioa Dlta to dwlclaizt the niRR and UICOI of~ should bt limited to due DtCded 10suppon lhc spcdficobjeaiva of the aon-cimc-criDcal ranovl ICCion supplementinccdstinadalaeabullbullampheexistinc RVFS) cotheutcrw~ FuWly bull ~~~stIU~~~afew middot lhaurhu
M DOCCd ill Olpccr I an EfJCA must be completed fortH nDIHime-crilical removal
~~~~-=r~~~~~~~~lho ~=middot~middot=t=~-==~o-R~~~-- Solicitiqoadltapltgtodiq=-oolhollllmioiJvali_ ~~~~d~Ab=oadh~~middot (See AppegtOxCiorasidomiddot
Actioft~nc~middoto~=~middot~=~~~ =~~~L~i=~~~rox=~lttiofts
20
J
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
I r I
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 3 EEICA Development Procell
lr-- 1 1~---1
~~ t=l l~J
l = JbA~
~
For More Information
I CEllClAii04(bXI~IafXSoodlltsllldia-poo 2 NCP
I bull1 s Removal Acnoa llOOIl(b~l) A-IIltSS Foctors ll00415(bX4Xi) EpoundJCA R_
ll
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
2 1 OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT 4 EECA Approve Memorendum
0 Subject Q 8BCkampround 0 Threat 10 PubUc Health WclfMe or the Environment (Includes Expected Chanp
If No Aclion Taken) Q Imminent and Substantial Endanacnnemlf Present 0 Eaforcrmcnt Actions 0 Plopoltcd Projcc1()vcSp and Coa 0 ~~
2 2 EEJCA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
II ol die EfJCA Approval MelllllltlUidum JliPIIId ooce die need for l
ft~~=~~n~~~bern=~efm~=~~or Approval Memorandum is noc a pan of the EfJCA but is pM of the adminilcnwve mcrd for die lilt
n
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
0
r
2 2 EEICA APPROVAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED)
infomwion 11l3Y also indicare the possibility or conwnination of drinkina WMer or scasilive environments or Other siruations or faors thai maypose tluall to public health ~ or the environment
For More lnformetlon
CERCLA fl04(bXi) WocmaOOo Sludia ond ~opdoas NCP flOCUI SmX4XI~ Community Rdlbons fl0041l(bX4) EEICA Rltquiremeolt
EXHIBIT 5 EEICA OU11ino
a ExecWJve Summaty a Sice ChnacriiMion
a Sloe description and bodltIJOWICI 0 Pzcvious removal actions CJ Sount ~ and exlalt of conwnbaadoa a Allaiyticoiw 0 Suumlined risk evaiUMion
a ldcnuficadon of Removal Actio~~ Objecdva 0 ~ limits on removalledoM a Oolmnillllioo o~ a oteminadon of removal schedule a PlMned rcmtdill aaivicia
a ldenliilcodon ond Allllysis olltanoll Aaioo Aloemodves 0 EtrcaiveDCSl a~ a c
a ~veAnalysisol Removoi AltoaoAIIenwiYeS a llltoomsnmdltd- Aaioo
2 3 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EEJCA EltMivt Summary provtdel a ttnenl o~ of the tOnllltft of ct EEJCA It JhoWd contAin a bntf dtscUUIOn of tht sue and lht cwmc or Pftbll ttn poRd by IIIC
2l
l i ~ lr middot--~ bullor =~ -middotshy~4 e e r ~ asect ~i ~
p~f u ~ 8 Vol
CJ
u
lO
-J
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
23 EEICA EXECUTIVE SUIIIIAR Y (CONTINUED)
conditions The Execudve Summll) should also identify the scope ud objectives of the ~moval action u weU u the ~movallttion alrmwives FtDilly this llaquotion or the EEJCA sbouJd provide informuion on the ~nded removal ICtion altemari~
The Executive SuiMIll) is in1ended 1o make the cauentJ or the EfJCA more accasib~ to revew by the public and is analoous in this respect to the Proposed Plan used in the remedial ~rriJo~~~~A~ then be used in the Action Memorandum wltich should include a
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
c~~~~~~-=~=~~~0000 =~~=~v=o~~~~~~~iD ====in~r=Stt~~~=-~(U~ferencc for uauncnt o-m conWrunenr or aDd dilpoal il is~ 1M ftturiYeS IbM
=-~~=~~=yUid Ionsmiddot- J dalaquililtyobilaquoo IDil risk_ shoulcl be =-lied u uriy u possibSe ~fore EPAshoampddCOOIdia-ICtiviua o(thrOSCJRPM wilhlbreot the site uscssmmt JIIMIIttmiddot risk asseuor and en(onemtiMI1qIJ scatr to ensure tppropriue cilia uccoRaodto~dltsamp
lnlormldoll_ dw sibull may be readily avubampe from many SOWCC$ includina
=~~site~ Remedial PAISI repons EEICA Appovlil MeU R FSs
~ond ~- repons ~=TollticS- ond Dileue Rqjslry(ATSDR)orSulcpolgtlit
---OIkuEli_lmpoa-(EISI) ~~Olt(eJ informolion _
ResooocltCoosavoliooood RltCOYl Aa (RCRA)- shyPiiblilhed~evoi-IOdledinicol--Documcnu c--FoclciOaa Siidi bull US QeoloPol sy (USGSJ - Falcnl fmetJaicy ~AfPI-- repons ~ ~Touc Relase laveNOry dala
2lt
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
Site Deacrlptlon and Background
The site description includes current and 1istoriW infOtnlldon This informarion ITIIY help Identify hawdous substmceS pollutants or conwninanu ofconocm or areu of he site requirina additional wnplina In ampatherinamp this information OSCsiRPMs should ~view Swc localIUid Federal pennlt files consuuction ~cords and local deed records for information on p~vious owners to decenninc mareriaJs produced stored or disposed of ac the she CERCLA section 104(e) information requests should also be considered In addition iniCtviews should be
= u neci~~~~~=~~itd~cru fMcaJ and aerial CUIJUC)hl The EfICA should document these dMa lO convey 1 clear uodentandina of the n~tUR orlhemiddotsnc
wheRI~~~~~==~==~=--ICIIOO
Sice kaiJon Sueetodd~USandcrossroods USGS lltlpCllrOpilic mop quadtooale IAollldollonJitudo
Typo ol facUilty ond operiooal S11111S Marials muuflawal stored or dispoeed onmiddotsitc Eounwedquaorilits ol-ond poollill_ Yunof~ Plaenupnor site usc
~~=~=i=~~F=~nses invesdampatiON and
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
r
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~~~~~~a~cownenW land use Pouible palhways of exposwe ldentificaOon of sensitive populations Estinwe of popuJ~ w n denside$ wilhin potentially affected radius Description of dn na wacer sounes National lfutoric ~rvation Act considerations
Sensitive ecosystems Wetlallds wikllifelxeedina Wikt and sccnic rivers COMeetJon lo lht human food dllin or food chaW ofochercqMilmaSensitive andor endaqered lpCciel eow
Prevloue Remove Actionbull
The silt chnaaizadoa stcdoo of lbe EFJCA lhiMd lbo dacribc bullYpmoious mcwa~
=rrsep=-~_-==-~~ r io- j(- y beorpailood IS rouow
The 1lt0p0 Md objoclives of che pcevioolo IltIDOVIIIICiioa
The unounc of time speM on lhe lftVious raDOYaJ ICtioa
The amount of mooey spent on the JR-vioul removat acdon
J orhalonloas_poll___ Of ltOIIIngtllod duriat che pmioua - shy ca The oecMolopa IIIOd IDIIor- lewlo ooed lor 1111 pnviouo oaioo
pooblic~middot~==~~~-=subjectiO-- c~ocu- typicollynotrelled_io_ ____
-J=~-c-=t~~~ofbochlhcEFAA Tride acms commmill or linMcial iDICirndol
~--middot=~==lt~upnvUeodlnras lbullfonnauon ucmpcttd t acher SUNtJ
J 26 I
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
__
--
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
EnfoncmenHensid~ information thai acnetally s~uJd DOt be placed in the mdministnlbve record me includes
FinwiaJ status of PRPs Record of jmVious neaotialions with PRPs and the resulu lnveslipory files rclatina 10 law enforcement Additional infomwion on enforcement hisrory SUaleJYdiscUSJion and recommendadona
EXHIBIT 6 lnformellon From PrevlouJ Remov11 Actionbull Appllceble To Current EEICA
lnforUtlon DIWllrevJon ova
Thil illormlt10n 11Y allow lie OSCIRPM raquo n11T0W _ICOPt ofiYiiuMoniOCif1llniWofllebullorraquolfilc
Prmu -ola ~Vimiddot mey effect INdlalbiiO we
-~tlmCItIIKIIortltiiUitd_IUP()IIIIItld equipmtnt being left I bull Ot prOrilion of tpiCIIIc UlilidM___(ag ellcticll~ -)lhll~meylillllct
~alllmtd from a ~~acionn4lulbllto lllcurrenc eec 119edftct1C1mp111100Uiclhclucltuonei
IICC1MS llmitliont beclubull of nidi trlntpOnllion fOIAH--middot-u-- lourae Natura end lnttt of Contamlnatton
To lilt bull--middot dlnaeri_ ltWI lllould bcplhoftd clurioc lho W 1ioo
~c~u~~~d=)~v~=~ infonnlooa may illdttde
LAgtc-olollho__~ poiiiiUOI(o~or laquogtnWWIioooo(o) ~ volume limlaquo rDipiWde ol the coalamlnabOa Pbyooalllld cbcaal oarilulo(ol oflho llulrdouo _~ poiJUQIII(o~ or--middot)T(l)pootnoallyolfltaeolbylheo
l7
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
J
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
The JOUIte of the contamination rora removalctioa often well defined However if the
=middotthe-~~~o~~=d=~~~ti=~~sbould ~i~~~n~ef=~~~~~~hysicalsumys which may indicate
~~~~j~d~~~ms~~=~=orWM) which
Revicwina put operations and in(onnation from lhc ToUc Releue lnveocory and inlfrviewna pest or current eJT1)loyees tuch may help detcmunc the JOWte ol-
mn u_~=~ceWS~~~i=fw 1n U11f1 on the tekctioa o( tbe removal IClioa
Anelytlcbulll D1t1
Tht ooal)ticalclaa aioa ~ qullllilllble claa ooGeckd fordlc EEICA Tbis ICCOoo
=~w==ra~~nbe-ooblolcidloltwuhiadlcoriaoo_worilgtltorporolodby-todle---- shy
slioi- typically be porfomlod io-widl aocepood EPA IIOid c-ct ~ (aP)~ Whcilt-Wftlllialollooldbecoooli-dwoqb
dleiaot=====--middots~~~ir~ootlltadyOIIdleNPI collecdooyaisollooldbullnmllyeoslftlblldu --wiUIIIo--ofwllodilaquoNPIIilliqiiOidremcdiiiiCiioo ~
AMI)ticaldorllrom-cooduceclbyEPAor--(el amporklcolshyoroo-lllllloridaor PRJs) IIIOIW io ~-middotmiddot Jeviewiqbully JOilwiW or_ W111 htlp OSCalltPMI delmnlDe the predaioll ancy ___lftd~o(_o lhae-shybe-bye dle-oliOUiioeqooolilycoeool_ __
=-=====u~--tlridbloobonodoodbloob
-J~j===-~~~rw-=-shyacaoes ThtEA-~Teom(ERl)llc-y-lopos~-oe W W1M1 Mil Wlltf sampllaa Mid ccoloPal ~ Alldltl utd 110 ju5tity I ~aQmeshycnoicoloaiooJialdbetbyquolllycoeooldlla ----be
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
24 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
evaluaaed based on qualiry assunnce docunwnMion Followifta this qualicy assutaDCe and~ process daLa can be compartd to existing health- or risk-based standards to determine the UlWc of the threu to pubUc health welfare or the environment
Str11mll nad Altk Evalul lion
The sunmlined risk evaluotion is a new rype of evaluation intenmiiare ill scope between the Umited risk evaluation undenakcn for emcrzeDCy removal actions and the conventional blleline assessment normaUy condUC1td for Rmcdial actions This atreatllUned risk evallldon can help justify taldnaa removal action and identify whM cumnt or JKndal upocum lhoWd be l)(tVCnled The nsk evaluation uses Amplina dala from the tile to identify lbe chcnicals or a~i~~~aeass~nrarhew~-ecu~ct= A
=~~e~ro~~~=bullhethcr to take a campeanup acooa 11 the sue g txpoiWU aced to be adcftssed by lbe ICtioft lftd 1a 50f1le eases de fiiiC appropnate cleanup levels
ln p1annan1 1 AOG-dmeltrilicai Rmovallerion OSCsiRPMs shoukJ consult wllh the
Wra-=~t~seu~~~~==~nY ~p~li~~==-r~=-=-~ ~t~htecons-reJs~6S=re~~~~~~7-0I B Risk Aucsomooc 0u- foe~ Volumo 1 H_ Healob Etullioo Moollll Part Alnccnm FUIII(Dccombcr 1919) EPM~I-891102 PB90-1Sllll fotiJIidlocc011 conductina risk evaiiWions
For the EEICA the -mlinod risk cvoluodon sbould locut 011 the opecifie pngtblem lhll the removalacdon is inlcnded to lddrai For cllllnf if the DOnmiddotrimtltridcal ranovJ ICCion is to install a lfQUnd wattr containment syscem the risk cvahallion ahollld lddlul riJk due 10
~~~~~~~is===rcorllMOeor ~
29
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
2 4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION (CONTINUED)
~moval=~~~=nto~~c~~~ ~henemirU~~~~~~=~~ts~=~n~~~~fylec~=~keUavailableinformuion Is deficient or ofquestionable qual icy 1 mace thorouah risk assessment may be advisable before deddinamp whether 10 take a removal action
In most if nOt all PRPmiddotand Suue-lcad actions with no RtiFS or other sile evaluation lftd liaie likcUhood of fuNrt EPA remedial action a conventional risk flnsment will be~ 10 cvllllllc aU ~ndal pMhways lf ~ submntiaJ lnfOCTllllion or dlla lfC oceded tqlfdiq risks posed at a Site (ca due 10 insufficient clMa quality from prior sice wort) OSCsiRPMs shoWd DOt huioo to request suppltmentary risk infonnatioa befoo any type of tapoose ICtioa ls teampcacd beinamp careful to justify any ldditional work thai IDly be requirtd However only in lbc cue wbae the non-dmeltrilicallttion will be the ooly Fuod-leld Ktioa upected bull the lilelhould OSCoRPMs coosicler pctfonnin1a risk ohal addlula all poOIItialepollftpathways
For More Information
JO
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ldenlifyina lhe scope Joals and objectives for a ~moval action is acritical step in the EEICA and m the conduct of non-timecritical removal actioru At any ttlease reprdless of whether the sue is on the NPL where the lead agency detennines there is 1 Wear to public health welfare or the environment a removal action may be liken to abate prevent minimize stabilize mitlptc or eliminn~c the release orlhre3l of releose
The foUowinamp example Wustra~e~ thls process 11 an NPL site han on~ RWS and where 111 opponwdty exists to conduct a nonmiddottimeltritical removal action Thr noawnc-cridcal removal ICUOn wt1J minimize miampraboo ofconwninatcd p-ouod waaer and coownin~Du from sublwflce SOtI but is coasidered an inltrim aioa bccau5e it ls upcctcd chat the rtmcdiaJ tctioa wiU ultitnllely lddtcss thpound area of coocem
la dw uampie lhr ampoal of the nonQmcltriticaJ removaltcaon is fO rnirumize mipadoo of onwnaftlled JIOUftd water and co tqia 10 tulucz concmUants ia the soU chM M die IOUftle of around wwr conwnampnaUoa This J011 COI1UpOnds co Slaquoboa J0041S(b)(2Xiv) of the NCP vtuch idtnrir~e~ hip levels of hazardous substances poUutanu or eontamiuna in soils latzcly 11 or near lht surface lhll maymipaae as a factor lObe CORSideted in detmniniq the appropnMenCSS of a removal actiOA
Fiw specific objeCtives are M developed for the sitr
Millimize mipwion O( concarninMtd pound WIIU WouJh WtaJaDoo of I con111nmcnt sys~em
lnidllt removal of volante orpnit compounds from conwmnd soils dvouah lnmiddotsitu treauncnt
Oewwr areas neceJSII) to ftlf effectively the dcconwniniiCd 50ils
l~tIIJ and~aaunat~ sysccn for around w~~erand V1p0r
~~d~or~MdsoiluaunentlhllwillpreVCDI
Dispose of WUCit strellnS from the nmovalledon
These obJCdi should be lltbit by spmrt cleanup tets while~ wtthin the JUNlory bniu lnd -ioina ARARs 10 the cxtcn1 pnaicabac Exhibd 1 provides a cllectldlofra 10coosodoraa -iopaiEEICAobjecn
s tutory Umlta on Removal Actionbull
b~ l~~-c~On-~lind llmiddotrnoodi Y hnuts Cor Fwdfinancalvll pun oo - 104(cXIJ of CERCLA If lhe need for excmpion deletrroned Ylo lhe ~ lhe details should be dcscnbcd 1ft the EfJCA as ellbull rn the Amon Mcrnonndum requestl the utmptKin
)I
ca
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
2 5 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Determination of Remonl Scope
The EEICA should help defme the scope of the ~movalaction The sc(h oflhe action
~bn~~~r~~~~J~~~~s~te~~J~~i~ ~~~~Pr~~~=i~~u~~e~rum listina to ensure the aoals of the removaJ m consistent with any potentialloaamiddottenn remediation
~~~~~~~ti=~~e~w~~u~d=~~Jinbull Mi suffiCient to meet compleDon requirements
aspeaf=~~=yY~nr~~~re~cumnt pltgtC1ice 111ltludlt opplyiaaan appropriale fltoml or s- AJWI consulliq a Rqiooal rial usmor or requesun1 suppon from ATSOR Of ERT
i~~~~=re~tenn~~==~ phases OSCsiRPMs shoWd always consider how thr removal ICtion would bat contribute 10 tbt efficient perfomnce oiMy remedial aettol lObe tlken 11 ~ llftdcr CERClA seclioft 104(a~l) OSWER Pllblicalioo 9360013 G Idle Re middot PI middot bull bull ooalon bull CEll - ~ ) cumple r EPA or dies- planSio beU bulllooc acuoa bull the 1111 ia 2 yan the rcmovaJ ICtioa shoWd be desipcd to enswr thll tbt lile is Jllblituaclltialcaioalllta __dleNCPJaWeriashouldbe fully Jddrcucd if poiSibk liven the statutory limia on removai~Ctions
Determlnetlon of Aemovtl Schedule
lhc~~~===~aai-vamiddottStk~~=t~~-rtnIOVaiiCtion may occ~~rec= from the pMnniaa ~ to the ~don or a oon-cime~
=~~~_ryy=~J~~6 ==~=~~~~r=~~PRPr~rr~~bt~~~truo-~~ dlt ~movlol KbOn can be a sipificw faclor in eilliampIDnl llilanldve ~ Iince l flllaquohnoicgttiaCICI---Ieadtime
Tht~ cimo-ld alsobeU-1 lor die caioa~dieshyo( lhr chmll k mty be oecesury 10 achieve beneficiAl rwdtJ wathira a cenain time fivne 10 ensure
=~~=icIO==~sctt-(KtOr ianwoana the ~mo tdledule is chE IampINlOI) linw oa ~middotmccd remova- FGrFundmiddotkad sroaroorupecwclooquahlyloradleltchtCIIICIJOIICYor-y~dlo OSCJRN -lei rrdeaa oarao oltomlci be wolliodleshyb FGrFuod middotlead taupecwcl oo qoalolylorMeu-dleobjeltcrshouldlleoorrdeaa
32
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
25 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION SCOPE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
removal act1on ahemative that c~ be implemented within a fUSODible time limit Facton such as wtOihtr and the avllilabilhy of Regional resources may also affea the ccmp~ time
~quire~~~~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~~u=iC t~lJ 10 ~~~~=~~~1
PRPmiddotIead site the 1-year stotuiOry rwrictlon on removal acdons is not aprccab+e (n such Cut$ it may be Gdvlsoble to establish a removal schedule in an Gdmlnistrotive order The schedule established for a site can be an imporullll decision criterion to evaluue removal~eoon ahematives based on the11 impiementauon lime$
For More Information
I CERctA fl04(aX2~ Rltmoval I104(ltXI) SultutOf) Limiu NCP fl00415(bX2XiKVltd~ A~altcncsa f1lt1on OSWER ~iauon 93600-ll Guadance on lmcnllbOII of lhr middotconmbu bullbull Rbullmcdw Pcrformanamiddot lloYision (Apnl 6 1987)
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AEMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
objecdS~cr~ln~~vi~on~ttmiddot~~==~~tMrimiled number of altemaliva ipptOpriMc for ldcbsslna the removalacuon objtctives If the iaformiDoa
~~pr~u~~d~~~~~~~~~~~UIJ~~overslahc activities 11 the sit~~RPs or SUile qencics rnay provide dw infonnMion
Treetment Technologlll
Whcntvtr pnctiltablc lhc IIIOmali tclcaion _should_ lhc CEIIQA f)ftftmu for UMmiM over ronvendonal cootainmmt or LMd dispoAI ~ 10 adcftu tha pnncopoi-Oiasioa AJ-pCERCLAscaiooll21(b)_IOPyoolyagt_ ICttOnSIhe ovc~IJUWJY schtme kads 10 the condusioa lhll this pretaace is lko bull I9POPfICC p (or removal actions Removal taions however cannoc confona adtdy 110 ~~aamrncs ror teiNd_ KbOnS becaase ofs relad timt CODibIIIIU lnd sampINIDr) limill oa mtdoaiiCIIOIOS To ldcnoly alltcmalti- lhc OSCRPM cao drow roo EPA widlda portiltOolwledonolopc$ and ltOOIWiinaNs uovolvtd bull V bull IOlthnocal odvklt roo ERT Oftlco ol Rctcwdl and OVIoprnomiddots (ORD)-START lhc TedooolosY 1Mov11 Oftlco (TIO~ da ~~=~=~laquohuOOUibOn pqram EPA llboraones w wt rcxca
JJ
-I
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
While uuubiliry stUdies often need noc be perfonncd for proven ~laquohnolo(iesln miD) cases a Slud) is necessary co ass UR the artainme nt of treaUnCnt obptive~ An EfJCA often allows time 10 plan and conduct a treatability srudy
OSCsRPMs should rerto OSWER Publication 9380017 bullbullfurt~~erlnalhe Use of Innovati ve Trealmcnt Technologies in OSWER Proaruns (AUJUSt 1991) EPAS4M-9()0041
PB91 middot921366 for further auidance on assessing ~Ratment option~
Based on he milabk infonnadon only he qualified ~laquohnolotia 111111 opply 10 he ~iaorsource ofconwninlligtn should be discussed in the EEJCA The useofpreswnpdve remedy ruidancc can in fflllll) cases provide an immediMe focus to the discuutoa and tdectioD of alcematives spcedina the process by limitinamp the univase ofeffective a~emadva for the ooo-timcshycrirical removal leUon Prtswnprive remedies involve die usc o( rtmcdtal ~ dlll tve
a~ilc=~~s=J~~~=-~Cdc~~ =~~=~rna~oemiddot=~~~~~ avaamplabk for wood UCIIer sites in OSWEJ Publicatioca~93SS~ ud ~3$50-46 TechnoloaY Slecuoo Guide for Wood T_ Sila (May 1993~ PB93-963~ This illf igtVlOOISIYalltd 11 OSWER Publiltalioos 9360~ OOid 9360(146 OSWER auidaocc~undoo-cle~forsoi-IOdiiiWiidpollondfilllioa
selecttd~~~~i~Y==~W==be thlr the CftliR lmiUIIcftt process caa be UDdenlood Fot eumpampe itone of lht lllemldwt is iDCiDmdon infonnllioa oa whechcr lht incincr1don wiU OCCWOCImiddotsiampe orotr- shouJd be provicled llwellaslheOI-ofw-tobe-lhodispooisioooflho_- ond lily AllAlbdlls Srfectsipilicwly lhe--middot- lloddilpooll-
~~r~~=-=middot~~~t=-tnl) DOC be~ 10 the tlaUDal of_ ill lhe ooncencnlion and form rod II die aile shy
~~~p~~r~=middot~~~-rr-a~ middot Truttnen t Technology tnform1tlon l ourclt
Appoodix D from OsWEll Publitodoo 93SS)()I Ciooddoco loltCoodooaioashylnYMipoQI 1011 FeMibility St1ldies (RIIFS) Under CEilCLA (Ocoober 1911~ EPAI54Mlmiddot 1900lt Plll9middot 11o1626~iopaphyoovarioul- oecMo~cgtPa la-EPAs Risk~~~=~~ ~ 1bull-oCT_~Yeadon (Moldl 1990~ EPAISW2middot9000la Pll91 middot mm helpfbaklhemullldlheuserCOIMIOIIIity
~-101101-coo-OSCsRPMtiotcvol lhoeampco-llld IIVIilabih~oechoolops TheAitemacJgteT_TIII shy
~=mbycI)OII13~~~~~
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
intcpes twardous wasce data inco a ccnu-alized sc~hable resowce Daampa about hazardous waste treument technologies ~ found in many forms in this system includina
LiiCrnlw-e SCltCh databases Expcn lists Trc11abitioy daJabases Fote and tnwpan dtlmbases Cootmodcb Case histories Expcn systtJN
The contnl Arne- contains mon than 1lt00 oedlnial doltumcna co1lcacd In a keymiddot won-swtbablt fonnalt ORO lubliarioo EPMWM-911049 Altetnadve T Tcchnoloay lnformotJOO Ccnttr-ATTlC Brochun (Aul 1991) provides adddonal wOf1JiliWa
Anochct- opctiiOd by no tbo Tcchnoloar Vcador lnfOltTIIliiOII Syoom r IMovMJve T~e~tmmf TecMoioPes (VISITn This datlbuc tcilicMa commwUcaDoo betweeD ICCMoiOI)- and co- and pri cleanup~ aod describes the capabWOcsand upcncncc vendors haw th inaovaive 1tChnoampotics The dlalbue Is usetw IJI devclopiq O~~lsJIS~U-r1r~ HodiM M 1-100-24~$05 cu provtde
1he Cleanup lnfonnarioo BullcOn Boanl (CLUmiddotIN) proda cleangtoic messhycapabilitics dirrctoria on-line bW1etias Md other cross-_ files on iDnovllivc-Special-- eUstwam tbo sy11emspecilically flaquoOSCJIRPMs CUmiddotIN cube ICCCSied with aCOrnpurpoundr modem line and celccommuniadons 10ftwatt bycallIna lO 1-519-8366
Defined allemllivesbull evaiiUIItd apina the lhort- lftd klnamiddotlltrm MpectS of three two criteria efkcdveness imtmeruabiliry and COlt Sllbcriterilto be evah~~~ed Wder each of die criteria ate identified in Exhi_bit 7on the followinamp pqe
lffect6yenenell
The effeaivenc~~ ofMIJttmltive ttltrs to its lbilky to meec me objectiw widU w JClDIIC of the mnovaiiCiim This Secuoa of the EFJCA should evahaae elaquottateaMiYe apiDII the soope
~fc~=~=ob~=~~d=~=t~=theMh lftd che rftvvorvnenl
How well each- public health and the should be dUcuuod I COIUI IHI nIIMer This dtscuss~ draws on usessmtftU conchtaH wader otbcr cvaJIampollioe emma lndudillc oaJmiddotCtnll cfftctJveness and pcn~~~Mt~~Ct ahon-tcm~ cfrecuyentnCA and comphancltbulloltIIMA
)5
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
r
EXHIBIT 7 ObJectivfliCrlterla To Be Uaed In Comperedve An~~lyale of AltemltlvH
0 Etfectiveness CJ Procectivcneu
0 Protective of public health and community a Proceetivc of woden durinamp impkmcnLKion a Protective of the environmenl 0 Complies wilh ARARs
0 Ability 10 Achieve RcmovJ Objecthu o teloe--wnmenc pecsec~ 0 No raidual eftlaquot concenu 0 Will1111inltoia lllllilloaa-tenaiOiulioa impleraenlod
0 lqgtlengtealtolgtilily 0 Tecllaical Fnsibility
0 Coaswaooaad---shy0 - petfonaoocduselalliit0 AdapableDca_coadilioas 0 c-igtulesltooanedial~ 0 Caabe-ial_
0 Avlilllgtilily 0 Equipnoal o _aadoavicos 0 Ouoside _0 Olf _ diopolol_ 0 PRSC
o - r-ibiucy
00 -orriahlt-ltgtfmiddotWIIfl
g ~==-=-0 ~ ~_- -_(if
0 go c_ 0 PRSCshy
0 -- shy
)6
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
----
r
26 IDENTI FICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTER NATIVES (CONTINUED)
The discussion should focus on how exh alternative achieves ~ua procecdon and descnbe how the altemBtivt will reduce control or eliminate risks u the sue thtouah the use of tre~tmtnl engtnecrina Of institulional controls This cvaluadon should ide ntify any unacceptableshon-tcnn Impacts
Comgwc whb ARABs and Osher CrircM Advisories and Gujdance
Section 30041S(i) of the NCP tequila dw Fund-flnanced removal~aions under CERCLA section 104 and rtmovalactJons pwsuant to CERCLA section 1061RampLn ARAJb Wider
~ ~l~~==~~~~~=~~middotmiddotn~~etu~of the rcmovaiKtton objeajoCI
The dewled anai)Sd sbould SWtl~Nrize hich nquiRments ~ applabk or relevant aM
~=~~~~==~~~V~a~welUI po~ltnual ARARs OSCsRPMs wiU lhlta be obilt 1D quickly ocltncify ponicular IOCjUimae in order to plrn fof complutncc or eluNrwe reqWrtmenu aot ol conccm for a Jivtn sue or altcmaliw
IIMfonJc~VIJCr~n=~~YO~rclcase AJARJ Jhould be ldeaallcd u poompdy os poniblc --by lhe OSCIRPM Tberor Oldy Swe stancWds lhM ~laquo proau~a- klenbfed by dieS~ Uta wnrly m~~~ner Md IDOft
= 1
=Jd~nb1in==q~=-=~~~Uysis in the EfCA The procas for fdentifyinJ and evaluarina ~ durint DOn-dme-ailical removal actions is shown in Exhibit 8 on the followina pap
In addition to ARARs EPA mayas appropriale idcndfy other Federal or SlMC advisorieJ crilerill or auldantt to be considered (TBC) ror a particular re~ TBCs are not requLrecl by the
~~~~~~cu=~rn~~e~u=~~~~~=o~aror Jilc or how 10 carry OUI cenain actions or requftmeru A llst orTBCssuch M the EPA Spill
=~~~~~AJ==~~-dlo Filii Md wkllire CoontiDIIioa Act caot be lowtd bt lhlt NCP Plopooed Rule Preamble 53 FR 519middot51450(0ccember21 1938)
Jusuec ~~v~e~~~~~-=~~~~~~ ~~~~se~Jrmiddot~~=stM m Fau 1993 and
37
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
EXHIBIT I Identification and Evalutlon of AAARa During
NonmiddotTime-Crltlcal Removal Actlona
ll
-shy
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
r
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNA TIV ES (C ONTINUED)
Loog-Jjan EffcaivtDCSli and ~11JlilDCDpoundC
This evaluation wcsses the extent and effectiveness of the conlr015lhlu may be required to manaae the risk posed by tR31mcnt residuals andor unUCated wastes Ill the site The followina componencs should be considered for exh ahemative
Mmhydc of Ri5k- This criterion looks at the effectiveness of the alternative and asSC55es lhe risk from waste and te1iduals rcmainina a1 the conclusion of site activitiel This component also evaiUIICS whether the ahemadve contribures to furure remedial objectives If the non-time-cridc41 remoVIIIClioa is an inltrim acp and is upeaed 10 be followed by rcmediaiiCtion this factor could be ~ in JCOP or de~ iftppropriate If the non-dmcltricicaiiCtioa is the LIM ICiioa anodpaccd for a sire or release then the mqnirude of risk should be fully evaluaed forthciCUOG
r~~-=~~~e~coiOrn=~~cn~u~ financed removal ICUOn fltHkgtwinamp iu COftdusion (see Chapecr 1) Ahr dw rctOOVII u complttecl PRSC COStS may be pW by the PRP State or kul JOVU1UIWGl or lhcremedtalprosram
Rcdugjoo oCiosjdty MQbiljry oc Yohurc Ilypueft Tmwmnr
EPA s policy ofpRfamce rc- tMibtllnt (ie flaquo 1laquohnoloaia lhll wiU J)mniDeDdy lftd lipifiCInlly mluce toxicity mobility or volume of the hazardous substMces as amphrir priacipal clement) ~Wm evaiUirion baed upon thr followina subfaaon ror a particular ahcmKive
~=n~~~rnp~~lO~=~)at The depe olreducrioa expected In toxicity mobility or volume The dttrtt IOwtich the tJuanmt will be intvmibk
~orS~y~=~=middot
= The olgt~lty of lhe monl ltedvlolosY 10 laquoduao lhe priociool- pooed by lhe - iadudrcxrenttowtdchlhctoxicity mobility orvolarneotchc~nreduced=)nv~wt~~=-lnd -ybc
The short-~am cffutiltftal criterion addmses lhc etrccu of the a~ttrnmve dwiq implemenuooo bef lhe obJCllgta - Allltnlllia ohould obo be ewl-1 widl rapec110 dw1r ctfeca oa human hdth lind the cnviroftment foUowtn unpternenadoft The foUov-1n1 fxtOII shoukf be~ bull ~for adlllcemauYCmiddot
fmcu101 gC lhc (omQJnUy T1us rctoc lddmsa In) nsk 10 thf alftctcd comtnunn) chl results from unplcmcnt1t1011 of the propoiCd -=oon vilether liom
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
2 1 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
air quality impacts tuptivc dusts transportation of hazardous maamperials or ocher sources
Pmrcaion or rbc Workers This factor assesses any thtcau to site wocten and the effettivcncss and reliability of procective measures that would be taken
EnyjmnOyenofAI mgwl This factor evaluates the pQ(tfttial adverse enviroomeotal
~~~r~~sra~rns~r~~ rune llnQipqropz Qbjcctiyq AR Acbjcyrd This factorestimlampcsthctime needed to ldUeve proeectioo far the aite itself or for individual clemcaCJ or thtaQ associalcdwittlthesice
lmplomonblllly
The implelnOIIIIbilicy crilltrioo oddlaquossa lht-and- ribililyof bull and lht millbiticy of Vlrious seMlta and -nIJ quiml duriq ils impkmcftllbOQ The foUowinamp faaon shoukl be c~ under dUs crilerioll
ThcEEICAIhtolgtililyoflht~IOgtIementlhtmcdy Tcdlllicol
=--rr~Jfr~middotau=---- salllqoodlhtllllmld -lht frlma in the mnovalsdledule
~~-~-~~lht~is~f~~r==shy~==-under~~=h-=~di=r r-====~===-
TheEfAillloold_ea__IIOioolywidt-IOiht-shypaoflht-YO bololtoiOiht upood-pa Catoitt-IIIIYbo ddficdlto COftiWCl or operw in rcmo1t localiou Climlle or letTIIia ny ~evtmy iftll1 oru---ampom- Fueumple - - shyoillwMcr tcp1f110ror scdimeNibora tank may be ua 11 lftetin1 tt~ Tcrapenan
~ry-~rl~rllr~=aoc bulllltlemlliw hill nwy also afka pedoraDCe For eumpk a tile~ ia a VIDey n y be JU~Cq~Uble ampo iovnsions or limiltd cunaulhmftR INikiq ~
~ Polcnllll Mure remedial acdonl should abo be~ Remedial Ktiol or a DOII-tlmeshy
cnccal removaiiCUOnthacompttklydeanJ ttpan NPL ~~emay tngertM fi~ ynr~
-shyc
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
r
2 6 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTE RNATIVES (CONTINUED)
requirements of CERCLA section 12l(c) This cvauarion should also consider the opention of
~~~~~r~~~~~~obrE~~i~~~~~lt~~M~middot~~~~on~i~~~~~~w appUcoblc 10 an in1erim action whert additional action is expected
If the sue will be receivint lonamiddottcnn remedial ueaanen1 the EEJCA must de1ermine ifeach
~~~=~~~~)bSC~~=~~=~~~~i~~~n~~~~~~ =~~~ ~CCLA efficient performance of any lonJmiddotICrm rtmcdialaction with respccc tO the release or tMaatned
~l~e~~~~=~~~cv~C~6s~~r~o~Jttr~ Ouidlnce on ttmentadon of the Consistency Excmpcion to the Stanlory Limits oa Rerooval
0tOC rel~u~~~SnMlcon ==~~~~ pcrionnonce olalona nn remedial1t1gt011
Ia some cues ic rMy noc be nsy to demonstnlt Jtmoval ataOft consisltncy wkh 1Kurt rcmedloiiiCbOII RcmcdlaiiCaons otitn caruwx be anooplled when an EfJCA is bctna devck)ped for a nonmiddotanwaltial removiiiCtioa II may be dirtkultto show with ICIIOftlble ~WI a
=r-~iwuh==~~~~~sbou~ themsclva of thai ducrecioa whm ~lapine and cvaiUIIina remofatbon alkmldws lhal would prot1dc fot paruat dclnups ofsilts
The abllil) 10 moailor lht cfftttivmss of the Wmauve may also be conJidered ia the EEICA Thcte mooiiOMI toll5idelwioos would uy aolt be cvallllled ror fuoclmiddotlcad noashytln~ricll removaliCtions whcft remedial wort was planned
Adminisnwjvc fcwibiljty
The ldminilttldve fcuibiliry racror cvalualel those acdvllia needed to coordinMe with other offka and a ll admi-vc ribiliry olcoch -should be cvaiUIOIgtd ineiUn1 the need for off-site amits sbmnct to ippliclbampe nooenvlronmenlalltwsIDd =middot~~r-=7 a flCiorS ohM should be ltOftlidered include bult
SsbullWort tilnFS Elcb altc~vc should be cvahalltd forb compliance wim the
=~f~~~~uJc~~~ quabfoes If me umc or -y nccdtd lto _ lllo - wW eueed die
~~st~~~ poosib1e Hcgtdquanm _a~ only requuod for -NPL- MCI for erterttfiCY waampven (rnD~~~ey aot ume
amptm HMI Wwym The EfJCA Jhould evahlale vhtthtrudl altenatw bullill
=~=~cc~~wOther r~~Yn_ or lOIUftJ 11MCa
bullI
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
AvaJtatiljrvgf$mkrs and JjliCnas --
The EEICA must detennint if off-site treatment storqe and disposal C3paci() equipment peBOMCI selliccs and ma~eriUs and other resources ~ to implement an alternative will be available in time to nuintQin the removal schedule AvailllbUity of funds to meet PRSC rcqulrcmenll is also a factor StveroJ Unporuuu availability factors are
Papnncland Tcshnplggy Usina the removal ~etinn ~heduk as aauidc the EEJCA should determine whether a specifiC ahemad~~e will be availlbk from the manuftcturer Qthtr technolotPes may rcq~ alqe number of skiUtd llborer1 or spcrialisu (ea bull welders pipe finm chemicll eRJincm) tbal may not be tudiJyavaillllraquoe if the silt is remote thus impiCtioa the lbilicy 10 memble lhe removal ICdon ahemabe
Oft-Sbulltc TtqrmctJl StXJIC apd Qjspoa If olf-sile rtmoval Md UC1UI1ea1 of the w~~~e is bema ~den=d the EEICA should llddras lhe adequlcy of olfmiddotsi~e ~y If lht Silt IS iD IIUKK locaioa damps type oflaViee mty lOt be availabk
a~o~~=~~~~~ ~~~~ri~=~(~~~R~olf-sise lhoulddisltusswlgtochcrlh= -fadliDosia~- ~~-~~li~~QA _K the ~se (A Mol rule
$cQtka eed MwriaJc This faaor iovolva ~such suvica M illgtonlory ltgtpadly and or chaaicoiiiiOiyta odoqo-lllpflliollftd equipment for on-si1e ICdviries Of Instal ion of urn utilities ea power lines ~ewer connections
Prpggjvc Tcsbnopsjg Thb factor IIISteiiQ whether specific ~elthnoloaia -eCY middot~ forche silt Promisina ~tehnokgtPasomctima require ftlnber
-~=-w~~~r~=~r- ~a~=r~-=~~~-rrmiddot oedloolopos
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Cpmmunjrv Acccpraog
As with Suue accepmnce community acceptanCe of an aJtemarive will be cons ide~ when makina a ~ornmendAIion in the EEICA and in the final sclettion of lhc allemative in the Action Memorandum
Coat
Each ~movaliCtion allemllive should be eval~ to determine ill projected COlli The evaluation lhould compan cadlllttmadves capital and PRSCcosu The present worth o( -ternlliva lhll will lase lonprlhln 12 monthssbouJd be calcu1Med la caain cua OSCampIRPMs may conduct a sensitiviry analysis o( the pn$CQl wonh cakuJidons_
To-lhocoscof-~ltcmocive lhocliftatodindilltctPRSC cosu of eadl al~mocive should be projeclod OSWER Publicolioa 9360~ Remo-1 eo Manoalt SyKem Vmioa 32 (May 1990) EPA1~middot9Ml03 P8~272691 provides-Oil perfonninc- pngtjeaioas and daily onctioa The lollowinamp coasidefod eaplaquoaallld PRSCcosu
llvedcapwcwu ConstntcCion costsrrrc lluildiap tod CfViltes Re5ocMioa expenses Truspon -1 dUposol Analytical costs ContinceocY allowance~ Trexmena lnd openrina cOilS
Indirect capiW C01U
r=-llld~oreau Scan-up tod shobdown
AMuoiPRSCcwu
~cs Aouiliary -ials tod 0MrJY Disposal of IOSMuols MoaitoriaaC05U Suppon cosu
Mllly-olltORio eWIiodclbeERCS-priccllto shyau_ -1 au- lilt simolar projects For IIOIltIInltftdy oo tho ERCS lui -liltI whm ouwde bods 1gtlt1111 coosiderod --_M 12 oldshyeo=Ct~~~=~~csr=r_ faabty cosu tht AtretlQR C1ty and Councy MIINCflll COIIIAdeJL for mMpoMr C01U end thr
43
c
- J
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
21 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
Producer Price Index for Finished Goods published by the US Deparuncnt of Labor iD the Monthly Labor Review All these infollllllion sourcescnn be found ln Reampional andor publiclibraries
ror~rnv~~onc~~a~~=S~=r~~~u~~~~S~tworth evahuues eltpendiwres Uw occur over different time periods by discounrinamp all furun cosu uslampamplly PRSC cosu to a common base year usually the present fmiddot Present wonh analysis
==~i~W3coS~UU~~tl~~~~~~oo pwticulamprly ~hKu when comparinamp ICChooampoaia with ditrercn1 opelltina Liletima The fiAIJ
~~r~~-==l~r~ind-ialho For abtmldVq thM iDdude ooly PRSC after I yar ampom che IW1 ofche rcrrmvaliCiioll tbe
lllCOI oflhoopcioa over die Nlllifeoflho pvjeashould becalcuiolltd laCltIltIIplriDa
~7mcill~~-=r~~i~~A~~Ic~s5~20 Revisions 10OMB Cutular A-94 on Guiddines and [)iscow)c RMes (or Benetil COli Anltysia (June 25 1993) proVIdes infomwioo on discowM raaes for prescm wonh ealculllions
In lddidoa OSCsRPMs should decmnine whether aacnsidvity Jysis is wlrIMal A Aaviry lftll)lis IIICIJCS the efrea daM VlrillioM in apecifk ooes assodled wid
==-~~~~t~=-==-middotand IIOiiaamp dlcirdfrltt 0111ho _ won11 Aseooiliviry IIIOiysu miampfa be ~ wbea ~tn exist lboul the amount of walt~ how quietly a eectaJampocy t1n ptrfonn or the ftCure price of cleanup services
For More lnformetlon
I CEitClA fl04(a~ Removal Action 1121 Cluoop SCaodanls amp~IMoYIltive T TcchnoioampY Resanh and
2 NCP fl00415(i) ARARJ Anainmenlt 3 OfliccoiPolicyAnalysis(OPA)IIIIgtUarionGiaiclelifteslorluforminc~
1-Analysis (Doclt- 1983) 4 ORO lllblialioo EPA6rolol-911gt49 Allaoaoiw T-TY
1nr- c--Arne Broclwre (Aupst 1991) l OSWEll PuigtIICIIKift 9234101 CERaACompli-widtOihorlawsManual
Pan I (I-rim Flllll) (A- 1918) EPA~middot191006 PB9G-272S3l OSWEll Pub1ica1ioo 92341-~ CERaA Compliance wich Olhor Laws Maaaal lllt 2 C1uo Abull Altt and Olhor Eomronrncnal- and ScaleR~ (Alii 1989) EPA~-1~ PB9G-141461
J
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
26 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED)
7 OSWER Publications 93SS0-46FS and 93550--46 lcchnoiOJY Selection Guide for Wood Treuer Si1cs (May 1993) PB93-96350S also previously cited as OSWER Pubticlllion 93600-46FS and 9360046
8 ~~~iU~~C~i~3JiiA~~~~~~~~[(~~(~~ ~9e~~~t=~ons 891004 PB89middot 184626
9 OSWER Publication 93SS3-20 Rcvlskms 10OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost AnaJysis (lune 25 1993) P893-963297
I 0 OSWER Publictlion 93603Q2 Superfund Removal Proced~uldance on llleConsidcrauon or ARARs Durinamp Rcmov~ Actions (A1J111SI991) PB92middot 9634()1CCil
II OSWER Publicarion 9360G-02C Removal Coli MMIJ(meoc Sysccm Versioa 3 2 (May 1990~ EPA5400-90003 PB9Ql 72691
12 OSWEll Publkoboa 93600-IV Fugtal Guidance on lmplcmentali011 ofllle ConsliCeoCy Eumption ro the SWUtory Unuts on Removal Actions (Jwx 12 1919~ PB9Q27o146SICCil
13 OSWER Pabhcarlon93800-17 funherinJtht Use oflnnoVIdeTreabDtlll Tcchnotopcs OSWEll froampnuns (Aul 1991 ~ EPV54tVl-90004 PB91 middot 921366
14 OSWER Publicadoa93803-03 1nvenlotyofTrnubilirySwdyVcndon (Manh 1990) EPAIS400middot9000la PB91 -ll8J9S
13 OSWER Publicadoa 983411 Revised Proctdures for lmp~meatilla otrJiae
16 ~~~~~(~~~rt~-~U~~9~~~ llvestipampion Requitemeat 1t RCRA Treaunent and Storqe FacUlties lt)anuary 4 1988) PB91middot 139295CCE
27 COMPARATIVE NALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Once the altemllives have been delcribcd tnd iftdividullly assessed apiast the crileria a c~ve aMI)lis JhoWd be condutad to eVIIa~elhc reladve pafonnlnoa of IKh lllerulive ia relmoe to each of die criteria This is in conlla5t to lhe pmediq Mil)lis in which ach lltcmalive wbullllllllyt tndcpoadcndy withoul considmbon oC ocher llltcntalivn TheC oC llle
==-~~=C=~~=be~Uwro 21 RECOMMENDED REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The WCA lllould odcMJfy die acuoolha bcsllico llle ~-criteria based on me comporaovciiiiii)SIS me prev1011SsccUon This~ lllouldbncftydctcribeme
~~~rr=~ocns~=YO~me adnvvclftOd fi lc c~y Wldt llle EECA Tlus oC me WCA yshypublte 1nvohttnrnl efforu by describlnt clcvly bullhy lhc alttmlllve bull111 recommended BcciiISC the EEJCA IS open 10 publiC cornmnl mnd evaiuanon and because EPA IS ft)((URlti 10 PftP11t
bulls
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
2 1 IIECOIIIIENDED IIEIIDVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE (CONTINUED)
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
r
Appendix A
Reftrenc u
OPA Publication Guidelines for Ptrfonning Reaulotory Impact Analysis (December 1983)
ORO Publlc3don EPA60Mvt-91049 AJtemmdve Treatment Techn~oay Information CcncershyATTIC Brochure (Au1ust 1991)
OSWER Publication 92002-02 AccclcralCd Response 11 NPL Site~ Guidance (Dcttmigttr ll 1988) PB90-2l8JOICCE
OSWER Publication 9200 2-16fS Quaaicy Assc for Superfund fllvi111nmcntaillolta CoUecuon Actltties (February 1993) PB93middot963273
OSWER lubllarion 9200lQIH-I Superfund Propam lmplemcnUOO M111t111 FISCII Year 1993 (June 1913) PB92-96l276
OSWER Publicorinn 9200 l-402A CltlCIUgtCtinJIIId Subcoo Guide 10 the SuperfundPropam (May 19121 EPAl401G-911012 PR-923
os~~~~~u~~~t~~~f~=~=-3367 os~~~~l~Jl~~f~~~t=9~~ os~~b~~l(l~iJti~=~~~~~~~=r the s~rfund Accclctwd
OSWER Publication 9203 1051 Volume I Numben ImiddotS (Dscembcr 1992) bull Volume l fumber 11 Starus of Key SACM Propam Manqement lssues-lnterim
~~middot ~~~96l~y Action and Lana-Term Actioa Ulder SACM-trim Gui~ PB9l-96l26l Volume I Number) fllfortcmcM Under SACM-IMcrim Gidooltc PB9l-963264 Volume I Number 4 Auessin1 Sites Under SACM-Inltrim Ouidaaoa P893-96326t Volume I NumberS SACM RelionaJ Decision Teanw-lntaim Guidance PB9J-963266
OSWER Pulgtlicadoo 9230()()JC Community Rcbriontto Superfund A lllodbnnk (Januory 1912) EPAllt()Jt-9WQ9 P892-96llltl
os~~rlt~~~a~lt~~~tsMiollll lln 1
os-~~~~~~r=R~~=~l a EPA~ 91009 PB90-1411J61
41
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
Referencebull (Continued)
OSWER PublicMion 9240~10 Users Gulde to the ContraCt Laboralory ProJram (Jon- 1991 ) EPAIS401P-91002 PB91-921278
OSWER PubliClltion 9242 2-018 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users Manual (Oclober 1987) PB90- 191966CCE
OSWER Publicotion 9242 2-02 SitemiddotSpccific Contnlctinj for Removals (April0 1989) PB91 middot2 1SOS3CCE
OSWER Publicadon 92426-01 ARCS Wort AssiJlliTICnt Manqement Ftcld Guidc (Jonuary 1989) PB91-21496SCCE
OSWER Publicaltion 92426()7 Approv~ennCoo_ SuoleiY 0lt Supeduad ~=~ntReew R El)(A-1990)
OSWER Publdioo 928SI-03 SIIIIIdud Opcnliq Safety Guides (Jonlt 1992) PB92middot963414
OSWER Publicooon 928S7-018 Risk AaltumentGuldonce 0lt Supertlod VoiWIICI H Helich EWon Manual Port A Interim Final (Ducmber 1919~ EPAIS4GI-191002 P890-l SSS8 L
OSWER Pllblicacioft 9215W2 Heollh ood Wecy Auclit GuiddiMs SARA Tide I Secdoo 126 (llocomberl919) EPAIS4GG-10 P890-2041S7
OSWER lllblicodoos 93SS0-46FS ood 93SSQlt06 1eeMoioiY Sdecdoa Guide far Wood ~~-~~-~9J963SOS olio povioosiy doolbull OSWER-
os~r~~~~u~middotu~~~~~=~~ PBI9-184626
OSWER Publdioo 93SS i~ Revisions 10OMB Cinullr Amiddot94 aa Guicleliaes ood DiiCOUIII Raoa IGr _ Coot _yamiddot(J- lS 1993) P893-963297
OSWIIt ~ 93600-02C tc Coot~ Syooem Vcnioo 32 (May 1990~ EPA54011-901003 P890-27269 I
OSWER Publicolloii93600-12A final Qudonceon menlllioaoflhe -cocymiddot Euioa IOiheSUiutOltY Umiuoa Removol Actioas (1 12 1989~ P890-274465CCE
OSWER Publialloo93600-12FSEu fngtmlheSUtulOltY Umi11aa Removol Actioas (Nove-- 1990) P891 middot9213041CCE
OSWER Publialloo 93600-13 ~oo~ofhe~~~ Remodiol luf Provosmiddot (April6 1917)
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
Reterenc (Cont inued)
OSWER Pub licauon 936001 S 1be Role of Expedited Response Actions Under SARA (April21 1987) PB91middot214221CCE
OSWER Publicauon 9360018Removal Proarun Prionties (Manh 31 1988) PB91-205bull841CCE
OSWER Publicuion 93602-02 Policy on Manlljcment of Post-Removal Site Control (December 3 1990) PB91-921326CCE
OSWER Publication 93602()4 Authorizadon for Rcaional Adminisaa~onto Approve Con l11cncy Exemption at NPL Sites (february 24 1992) PB92-963343
OSWER Publkluoa 93603-01 Superfund Removal Procedures-Action Menxnndum Guid4nce (Dcamber 1990) EPA5400-901004 PB90-274473
OSWER Publkanon 93603-02 Superfund Removal Procedures-Guidance on the CoftsidcIMlOn of ARAJls Durinamp RcmovW Actlons (Aups~ 1991) PB92-34011CCE
OSWER Publicouoo 93603-05 Supeofund Removal -ds-Publie Pornltipodoa Guidooco foe On -Scene Coonhnauws Communacy Rtlabons and the Adminisuuve Record (Junlt 1992) P892-96J416
OSWER PubUcauon 9360 3-06 Suplaquofund Removal Proccdures-RemovaJ Enforcement Guodaoelt (or OnmiddotSccnc Cltgtegtrdiuor$ (April 1992) PB92-963409
OSWER Publicauon 93604-01 Qu3licy ~tyCon~ Guidance for Removal
t~~~~t~~~on~(lnlerirnfulli)
OSWER Publicalion 93604-02 Compendium of ERT Soal Samplina and Surface Geoph)lica Proccduns (January 1991 ) EPA5400-91006 PB91 -921273
OSWER ~icadon 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Surface Wr and Sediment SampliDa Proeedum (Januaty 199r) EPA5400-911005 PB91 -921274
OSWER Publiltoli 93604-05 Compendium of ERT Air Somplin1 Proceduns (May 1992) P892-96)4(16
OSWER Publieooon 9360~ Compcndiuns of ERT Ground w Sampiina -dura (January 1991) EPA5400-911007 PB91 -921273
OSWER Public11100 9360W7 Compcodiwn oiERT w SamPin1-wa (Jonoaory 1991 ) EPA54011-911008 PB91 -921276
0 ~ramp~s~-~~m~TToX1lt1ryTtsltubullIProeedwa10 VERPIbl~cauon9)6()410 RcmoVampIPmpam-RqwuencxbullvcSed~UI~
( ocmbtr 1991) PB9 2-96Joamp08
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
Refertnc (Continued)
OSWER PublicaUoo 93606-011 Technical Assislonco Team (TAT) ConlracU Uscrt Marullll (October 1991) P891-963407
OSWEll Public3lion 938001 7 Funhcrinamplhe Use ortnnovadve Tmuncnt Technoloeies Ln OSWER ProaMU (AuJU~ 1991) EPAS4012-9Ml04 P891 -91 1366
OSWER Publication 93803-03 lnventory orTreatabiUty Study Vendors(March 1990) EPAS4012-901003L P891-22839l
OSWER Publication 98320-IA Proccltl felt Documcndna COliS for CERClA Section 107 Actionbull (111111111 30 19Bl) P89H389liiCCE
OSWER Publicaliotl98321 COlt Rccol) ActiotiS Uadet CERCLA (AUJIIIt 26 1913) PB91 -131966CCE
OSWER Publialioo 983211 Guidaoco oo Oocwnentiq Dltdsions Nolt 10 Tllk Cool RCCOIa) AclioriJ (J-7 1981) P891-1390411CCE
OSWER Publiclrioo 983213 Superfiuld COlt Recovery Stnltqy (Jaly29 1988) P891 -13906liCCE
OSWEll Publicolioo 9833 0-IA Guidoocc CERCLA- 106(a) Uoilalenl AdmioisulliYO Onion felt- DaipiiOd Romedial_ (Manll 13 1990~ PB91 -1390n1Cal
OSWEll Publicalioo 98333A-1 FIMI Gooidaoa011 AdmiolllnliYlt -lOr Sclectlooof CEROA ~ AltDoos (llccombcd 1990~ P891 -1391211CCE
OSWEll PubliltMioo 98Jol10 illocrim GtiMiooa Nodcc -Nqoriolions and _ Excblllamplt (Oaobcrl9 1987) PB91 -1392llCCE
OSWER Publicorioo 98JoiIO-Ib ModeiNodcc Leaen (lcbnolly 7 1989) P891shy139279CCE
OSWERPublicadoo91Jol ll~llocedonofor~Oif-$iteRAltDoos (mberi3 1987) PB9 1-139117CCE (AIInalnole-oadlibullmuucbullpeaodia 1993)
OS~f=~~ff~~~~~~~~=-- dlls-lopeaodin 1993)
OSWER PubliltIOoo 91360-IA Coomulily Rdodoao 0ooUot- ActiWia IIIII leYlt~oldie-- Rcconf(-mber31911) P89 1-139$19CCE
OSWER-- 983728 ampforoc- lojecl ~- FYI993 UpdW (May 1993) P893-963602
lO
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
References (Continued)
Slllutes and Rqulallocu
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Ulbility Act of 1980 u amuded by lhe Superfund Amendmenu and Reaulhoriwion Act of 1986 42 USC f19601-967l (1992)
cf~lt~~~~gt ~~=~~ ~~ru~O)d Response Actionsll FR
H~~r~frt~~h~~~-~~~~~~~=--~9 1989) ll FR 2l094 (June 20 1990) ll FR 3201l (AupJI 6 1990)ll FR 46054 (Nomber I 1990) l7 FR 6-403 Fdgtnlary 24 1992~ (onctifiltd II 29 CFR 11910120)
Worter Proccctioo 54 FR 26654 (JUDe 23 1919) l7 FR U087 ll088 (lunel4 1992)(codified 1140CFRIIrt311 )
Nllioool Oil and Hazardous S-sPollution CoodoaltnltY llao ll FR 1666 (Mardi I 1990) (codificd 1140 CFR fiJOOI-300920)
) ll
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
Appendix B
Key Wordbull Index
Ac1ion Memorandum 4middot5 8 14-15 20 31 38 42-43 46
Adrnini$011dveCgtrderonConscnt(AOC) 11
Administndve record 13middot15 20 24 26 lt16
Approl Memooudum 5-6 llmiddot l7 19 21middot23
Ajgtpllcoble ~ IIIII oppropriaiE (AIWIJ) 29 31middot32 3lt4-38
Confideati1l Information 26-n
c 9middotlO
Coopetld 1
Coslecovtry II
EnvirobulluncntaJ Response Team (ERn ll 32
Me ofU- (MOU) 1
Nolialoaer bull bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull IO 0osc 17middot11
Publiclnvolmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot l~ 12middot 1l43
Pootmiddotmobulloilite cooaol (~) bullbullbullbull bull bullbullbull l B 39 42-44
i--ponies (PRPs) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull l I() II 2l 26-27 39
Plolimlaory-(Plt) 4 22
43-44---)lis - 26-27
Roponol DeasiooT(RDl) 3 7-1 II
Rtmediolla~SNdy(RIIFS) ll9-20
ltlt111Dal objod middotbullmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 20 31
31middot33
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
Key Worda Index (Continued)
Removal scope 32
Removal si te evaluation (RSE) 4
Silecharacterization 24-30
Site closeout 5 II
Site dcsltripltion bull bullbull 2l-26
Sioelnspeclioo (51) 4 24
Statutory limiu 61 II 19-20 31 33 bullt
Streamlined risk evaluadoa 29-JO
Soapaflnd Acceletolltd Claoup Model (SACM) 2-l 7-8 IG-11 28
Unilalcrtl Admtoistnlivc Order (UAO) II
) l l
-J
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
Comporioon of EEICA to RIIFS
EFJCA Proqp
UJCAA~ 5cciiNIIIINfliICM~AIIIIflladinamplor ~nthOnlldlftampoflrnlllbulllllraaNd~ lftdlfprutiiiMinllllinllllandllolblumial clldlnltrmcatandatnerallileWonutiol DDt111111MIMtMNMion-ll~Pcriknl and KUoR it OIHIMCltnIQI
__ otia-loijlai shy
bull s-n-~IMtldllld-shy
~ Collmiddot~~~~~~ Wlnldy-~n
o--- --of - ~ Coillcldlla ___ ~-----~
AdM~(________
RIJFS Proqubull
VWIIiWidcalifJwtUofCOftCItll Ciriii~IIWlllletMofworil
middot IUirSScopl CoUen111111 uJIUt Galt-o~lddotloM
o--n-E__~_
_~fiiAAAAI
ldallitr~
o~
-shy__ lda-r~
0 _ lll_ lilal~ cn-- oiOOMIM-shy
~---ol---shyCOIIIAinlllllt-r_fiiU CciiiiMt
eoct-rill shy~----- Ddilll Onllll shy
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
----
r
Appendix c Comporil0f1 of EEICA 1D RtFS (ConUn-)
81fS Prpqumiddot
FEASIInmSTIDY
S Wtndlkallomiddot- _AIIII)Ikola-IAdfoll k Deo_tolAYW
RcediampIICiioloijaYICI idlftdLyacmtiiiiOtflnolotia(pll-aunlpdYe (knmi~JfOIIIICIIOU Nmedyand IIWibWiyampftldiu ~) VoiiMa or IWW olltiC4JI b ahiwtlftctl tltll Sma ltCIInoklu jiiOna -
ltMnllptOIIriollol-lluJIII shy ProiQiopOoluldcoCifkMOI r___~
c~~AAAill ____ _-dfeeo__ ~tlun-1
IOUIICJ -_ SIIan-wtlilashy--shy
~
E~
T_billllily )c _fiTS__ - Aucrol____ ~t-bullllloa----dy r- _ _ __ c--~ middot~Ill
4 ~etA__ middot-shyOootnlol -1--~ tat--~--__ol~ IMIIIdiq or_
SIIonmiddot___-shy
c-a ~
~ 1(-w___(mn -
f bull __u~ ~ _~-- ~~___IEICAIIIbullIall ~- flbullkllllO -shyOampWO~tmJOt~for~~lil l)~ (alPSUIIdtfCDICtA I()aoMrl IPA IWifCa104_)
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
r
Appendix D
Model Notice of Decision Not To U11 Special Notice Procedurnbull
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 0
(ADDRESS]
NOTICE OF QECIIION NOT TO USE SPECIAl NQTCE PAOCEQUAES UAQENT LEQAL MWEA CERTIFIED MAILmiddot RETURN RECEipT REQUESTED
(IM)
(Name llld Address rl-ny Responsible Piny) (co RUred Ant or ConliCt moo)
Re [Name rl Si~ltl [Addlm or localioo riSito) (lbt Sice)
0 [Name riPRP rlodhltiduol bullu or modom ochetwisc)
This lmernocilla you dolhc UnioodSS Eo-nlal-ioa Apey(EPA)hol
=~--~~=llt~~~cr-=-- nftJihc [RIIFS] [RIIFS for= unit) [RiloRA)[RiloRA for_ unit)
Nona or POTENTbullAI u11rnx
Juioddodlntho_~-pmioully-toyouEPAholeVII-in-ia -widtlhcia oflhc EPAholiofonMdon~ tholyOIIll boa
=~~~~~1=~~middot~ CERCLA inelodeltMd --llld -onrllhc bullbull wdJ bull-wbo _tror~or-rlhazatdous__totholitoor-wboIIClteldhazardous--ror__
D[ruiON NQT TO ISJ SPECIAL NQDCE
MMiltwf _ OSllloEa ~ bull)4 It-Ill _ ~ ~ l 19) IMt-tJtmIIOCL Tilu_ay -bull--flflk_bullk~~~JaWtt-lnuMIbull Qlffallr~Wllef ~
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c
--
I r I
Notice Of Decision Not To Ubullbull Speclel Notice Procedures (Continued)
would not e(pedhe a response Examples may include where past dealinas whh the PRPs strooampJy indica~e they art unlikely to neiO(iaiC a settement where EPA believes the PRPs have noc been ncaotiatinamp informally to this point in ampood faith or where PRPs lack thc resources to conduct reJponse activhies)
The decision not to use the spedal nocice ~dure does IKIC precludt you From enterina info discuuions with EPA reprdina your ~on in response activities at the sile The docisioa
t~~~tw~~=sor~nrYJe~ions AQMINJST R AUVE RECORD
Purwanc to CERQA Secnoa ll)(k) EPA muse establish lldmiftistrwive ~ thalcoabins doewneaCs N1 bm lhe buis of EPAs decision on die selection ofaruponse ICdoa lora site The ldanistrlbw reconl files which CODampain the doalntocs reLited 10 the response doo aiecled for chis ake (lilttll be) [bull1 availlbk 10 the publjc for inspcaion and comment The primlry IOCIIgtOII is ~Uy the EPA Rqional office (lnclude spocilie inf pdiq the loaboa ampltd availlbihty of lhc record fiJcl
EPA CONTACT
If you or yow lllOme) hive any qucsciolls penainina to this maau please dUttc them 10
S-tely
7
c