+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

Date post: 03-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: sampath-bulusu
View: 222 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend

of 199

Transcript
  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    1/199

    1

    In the Court of Shri Najar Singh, Addl. Sessions Judge-cum- Special Judge, CBI,

    Harana !anch"ula.

    CBI Case No# $% of &$$'.

    (ate of Institution# 1&.$).&$$'*+1.$1.&$1&.

    (ate of (ecision# &&.$+.&$1+.

    CBI Versus 1. (r. pender (ulesh son of late !armanand resident of

    House no.1'$), Sanja Colon, Ballahgarh, aridaad,

    Harana permanent resident of /ohalla /unna 0al Near

    Shi /andir, 2asa /a3ana, /eerut 4!5.

    &. Amit 2umar 6 Santosh 7amesh3ar 7aut son of

    7amesh3ar 7aut resident of -18', 9ma: ;:ecutie

    loors, Sushant 0o"-III, Sector illage !aturnandurar, (istrict A"ola,

    /aharashtra.

    +. Jeean 2umar 7aut son of 7amesh3ar 7aut resident of

    ;C-II, C-1$&, ;ssel ?o3er, =urgaon, permanent resident

    of >illage !aturnadurar, (istrict A"ola, /ahrashtra.

    @. (r. 2rishan 2umar Aggar3al son of Nemi Chand Jain,

    resident of House No.%&, Suhash Nagar, N;B ?hana,Shiaji !ar", (istrict Al3ar, permanent resident of ?ijara,

    !S ?ijara (istrict Al3ar 47ajasthan5.

    ihar, (elhi.

    8. /s. 0inda (*9 ?utachin resident of Nurses Hostel,

    7oom No.@

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    2/199

    &

    1$. /ohd. Shahid son of 0ate Adul /aid, resident of B-

    &@II*Ne3 (elhi.

    !resent# Shri 7.!. >erma, !ulic !rosecutor for the CBI.

    Accused Jagdish and Jeean on ail 3ith Shri Ahishe" Sharma

    Adocate and Shri /.S.7athi, 0egal Aid Counsel.

    Accused Amit 2umar 6 Santosh 7.7aut, pender 2umar (ulesh,/anoj 2umar, 2rishan 2umar Aggar3al, =asudin, /ohd. Shahid in

    custod represented Shri Amit (udeja Adocate, Shri /.S.7athi,

    0egal Aid Counsel, Shri ?arun =upta Adocate, Shri Shi Charan

    Chaudhar, Shri Ahishe" Sharma, Adocate.

    Accused 0inda and Saraj 2umar 2oind on ail 3ith Shri Ahishe"

    Sharma Adocate.

    J(=/;N?#

    Central Bureau of Inestigation 4hereinafter to e referred as Ethe

    CBIF5 had filed the composite challan*complaint under Section && of

    ?ransplantation of Human 9rgans Act, 1))@ against accused (r. pender 2umar

    (ulesh 4A-15G Amit 2umar alias Santosh 7amesh3ar 7aut 4A-&5, Jeean 2umar

    7aut 4A-+5G (r. 2rishan 2umar Aggar3al4A-@5, /anoj 2umar 4A-

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    3/199

    +

    &. Succinctl, dilating upon the facts leading to the prosecution of the

    accused culminating into trial of the instant case are that on &@ thJanuar, &$$', the

    /oradaad police raided the unauthoried and clandestine hospital of Amit 2umar

    located at @+%@, Sector &+, !alam >ihar, =urgaon in connection 3ith the

    inestigation of I7 No.@' dated &@.$1.&$$' of !S Ciil 0ines, /oradaad, !.

    (uring the raid, three ictims 3hose "idnes 3ere ta"en out operating them in

    recent past and certain others 3ere found ling there. ?he ictims 3ere in serious

    condition and 3ere shifted to (istrict Hospital, =urgaon. 9n the 3ritten complaint

    of 7aghuraj Singh, SI, !S !2ot3ali (istrict /oradaad 4!5, I7 No.&% dated

    &ihar, =urgaon and inestigation 3as ta"en up. (uring inestigation, Sections

    1&$-B, +&8,+@& and

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    4/199

    @

    remoed 3ere arranged accused (r. pender 2umar (ulesh4A-15, Jagdish 4A-

    '5, =asudin 4A-)5, ashpal Sharma 4Since died5 4A-1$5 and /ohd. Shahid 4A-

    115 and others through a 3ell estalished net3or" of touts. >ictims 3ere "ept

    guarded in the premises speciall hired for the purpose Jagdish 4A-'5 and

    ashpal Sharma 4Since died5 4A-1$5. In furtherance of the said conspirac, the

    accused got the pre-operation e:aminations of the ictims done in different

    laoratories. After assessing the suitailit for transplantation, one "idne each of

    the poor ictims 3as remoed fraudulentl in the illegal hospital estalished at

    =urgaon and transplanted to need recipients after charging huge amount of

    mone. hen the ictims protested against the remoal of their "idnes, the 3ere

    threatened 3ith dire conseuences and pressuried to "eep mum. Accused Amit

    2umar 6 Santosh 7.7aut 4A-&5 3ithout haing reuired ualification laid do3n in

    the ?ransplantation of Human 9rgans 7ules, 1))< and eing a uac", along3ith

    his accomplices 3as carring out "idne transplant operations in the aforesaid

    illegal hospital 3ithout haing e:perts of releant fields of medicine and necessar

    life saing facilities, as prescried in the ?ransplantation of Human 9rgans 7ules,

    1))< "no3ing full 3ell that this act ma caused death of the ictims and

    recipients. 9n completion of inestigation, the CBI filed composite

    challan*complaint against accused Amit 2umar and others 4A1 to A)5 for trial for

    commission of offences punishale under Sections 1&$-B read 3ith Sections

    +@&,+&8,@1%,@8

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    5/199

    ipin Chaa, !@@ !.S.!anchpal, !@< 7andhir Singh, !-@8 7amesh 2apoor,

    !@% 7ashmi, !-@' 7ainder Singh, !-@) Sha"il, !-i"ram 2alra, !-%@ (r. >.N.Sharma, !-%< (r.

    S.S.Sang3an, !-%8 (r. 2ishore /oresh3ar !impal"ar, !-%% (r. >.2.Bansal,

    !-%' (r. 2.S.7ao, !-%) Bau 7am, !-'$ (r. I.C.>erma, !-'1 7am Ni3as,

    !-'& (r. 7ajesh Jain, !-'+ Anjala, !-'@ (r. Al"a Bashin, !-'< (r.

    H.7./.?ripathi, !-'8 7ajesh Chauhan, !-'% C.0.0as"er, !-'' 7.2.Shah,

    !-') 7ohit Singh, !-)$ Chandan Singh, !-)1 !areen /angla, !-)& 9m

    >ati, !-)+ (r. Asho" 2umar, !-)@ /anoj Jain, !-)< !arth Sahu, !-)8

    >inod 2umar, !-)% Amit 2umar, !-)' 2uldeep Singh, !-)) ash !al Singh,

    !-1$$ (eender Singh 7athi, !-1$1 (eender Singh, !-1$& 7.0.ada,

    !-1$+ 2rishna Sastr, !-1$@ 7.C.2arnata", !-1$< Aja 2umar Bassi, !-

    1$8 2rishan ?uteja, !-1$% /ahesh C.>aida, !-1$' Balasuramon, !-1$)

    Satinder Bist, !-11$ >inod 2ataria, !-111 7ajesh 0al, !-11& >ine /udgil,

    !-11+ (aender Singh /aan, !-11@ 7ajinder Singh, !-11< !.2.=roer, !-

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    8/199

    '

    118 S.C.Chauhan, !-11% /.7.Atre, !-11' 2.0./oses, !-11) 7ajudeen,

    !-1&$ /.2.(har, !-1&1 Arun 9eroi, !-1&& Shahid, !-1&+ 7aghuraj

    Singh, !-1&@ Anil Singh, !-1&< Jitesh 2umar and !-1&8 7aji (3iedi.

    8. It is 3orth-3hile to mention here that the accused Amit, pender,

    /anoj 2umar and 2rishan 2umar Aggar3al admitted some documents and 3ere

    e:hiited as ;:.!'8*1, (-1@&,(-&

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    9/199

    )

    '. Before coming to the rial contentions adanced 0d. Counsels for

    the parties, it 3ould e adantageous to gie the rief s"etch of the eidence led

    the CBI as 3ell as defence #-

    4i5 PW-1 Dr. R.S.Dahiya stated that he 3as 3or"ing in !=I/S

    7ohta" since 1)'+. He further stated that a letter 3as receied

    in the (irector office in !=I/S, 7ohta", from Ciil Surgeon,

    =urgaon. He further stated that on receipt of the letter regarding

    "idne scam, the (irector, !=I/S, 7ohta" constituted a fie

    memers committee, (r.7.2.2ar3asra, Head of Surger

    (epartment. ?he committee 3as constituted to enuire aout

    the "idne scam 3hich happened in =urgaon. He further stated

    that he has seen the report gien the committee in 3hich all

    the details of the isits and the conclusions hae een recorded.

    ?he report is ;:.!1*1 running into si: pages 3hich ears his

    signature and signatures of the aoe-mentioned other memers

    of the committee.

    During Cross-examination,he stated that he had

    not seen the documents 3hich hae een referred to in the

    report ;:.!1*1 and he has seen onl the said report.

    (ii) PW-2 Ashok Kumar arit stated that he is 3or"ing in

    /edical Council of India as (eput Secretar from /arch,

    &$$+ and still continuing the same post. He further stated that

    the CBI had as"ed certain information from their office

    regarding some record of the doctors 3hich 3as supplied

    him to the CBI. He has rought the record 3ith him. He further

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    10/199

    1$

    stated that a A letter ;:.!&*1 dated &%.&.&$$' 3as

    receied from Superintendent of !olice CBI*;9->II, Ne3

    (elhi see"ing certain information aout eight doctors namel

    (r. Santosh 7amesh3ar 7aut 6 Amit 2umar, (r. Jeean

    2umar, (r. Saraj 2umar 2oind, (r. pender 2umar, (r.

    2rishan 2umar Aggar3al, (r.N.2.Aggar3al, (r. Asho" 2umar

    >erma and (r. B.!.John regarding their registration details

    3ith /edical Council of India. He further stated that in repl to

    the said letter, he sent repl ;:.!&*& 3hich ears his

    signature on ehalf of /edical Council of India ide letter

    dated $+.$+.&$$' enclosing there3ith the details regarding their

    registration 3ith the /edical Council of India. He further stated

    that he had proided further information ide letter ;:.!&*+

    dated $@.$+.&$$' 3hich ears his signature. He further stated

    that the information contained in repl ;:.!&*& and letter

    ;:.!&*+ 3as gien on the asis of record aailale 3ith the

    /edical Council of India.

    During !ross-examination,he admitted that in

    letter ;:.!&*1, the fatherFs name, niersit and addresses of

    the persons regarding 3hom the information had een sought

    3ere not mentioned. He further stated that ide repl

    ;:.!&*&, the had sought details regarding the aoe-said

    persons that is fatherFs name, niersit, addresses etc. He

    further stated that he has sent Anne:ures I to I> ;:.!&*@ to

    ;:.!&*% along3ith letter ;:.!&*& dated $+.$+.&$$'. He

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    11/199

    11

    further stated that enclosure ;:.!&*' 3as sent 3ith letter

    ;:.!&*+ dated $@.$+.&$$'. He further admitted that

    information gien the /edical Council of India in respect of

    (r. Amit 2umar referred to in the letter ;:.!&*1 of

    Superintendent of !olice, CBI*;9->II*Ne3 (elhi at serial

    No.1 3as incomplete and inconclusie as full particulars

    regarding the fatherFs name, niersit and addresses 3ere not

    proided. He further stated that the CBI did not furnish the

    details regarding fatherFs name, niersit, addresses etc. as

    demanded their office through letter ;:.!&*& dated

    $+.$+.&$$'. He further stated that as per Anne:ure ;:.!&*',

    (ulish pendra 2umar son of !arma Nand (ulish 3as

    registered at serial No.&+

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    12/199

    1&

    under3ent dialsis procedure in /A Hospital, !itampura. He

    further stated that generall t3o dialsis procedures 3ere done

    eer 3ee". hen he 3as returned after dialsis, one person

    met her in the /A hospital, !ritampur and as"ed her as to

    3hether she 3anted to get "idne transplantation done. She

    further stated that her mother used to accompan her in the /a:

    Hospital. She further stated that the gae her the drip and too"

    her to the same da i.e. 1'th Januar, &$$8 and "idne

    transplantation 3as done on that da. Accused (r. Amit 2umar

    3as present in the operation theater. She further stated that at

    the time of operation, she 3as unconscious under the

    anesthesia. She further stated that the amount of 7s.8.$$ lacs

    3as paid to3ards the e:penses her father. She further stated

    that accused Amit 2umar told her that "idne plantation 3as

    legal in Harana as there 3as no la3 applicale in Harana in

    this regard. She further stated she can identif accused Amit

    2umar, pender and /s. 0inda, 3ho are present in the court.

    She further stated that she remained in contact 3ith accused

    Amit 2umar een after "idne transplantation for medicines

    and injections.

    During !ross-examination, she stated that she has

    not rought her medical record sho3ing that she 3as suffering

    from Nephrotic Sndrome. She further stated that the 3itness

    has procured the photostat copies of the record 3hich 3ere

    ordered to e "ept on the file. She did not rememer no3 in

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    13/199

    1+

    3hich ear she 3as in I th class. She further stated that she

    had sumitted the record including receipts regarding her

    dialsis procedure done t3ice a 3ee" in /A Hospital. She

    further stated that she is IIth passed. She, ho3eer, denied the

    suggestions.

    4i5 PW-& 'eera Kumar #arg stated that he has three children,

    t3o daughters 7ama =arg, Chhai =arg and one son /ohit

    =arg. His 3ife Anjali =arg is a house-3ife. hen 7ama =arg

    3as in Ith class, she had s3elling on her legs and the doctors

    diagnosed the prolem as Nephrotic Sndrome. He further

    stated that in the ear &$$ihar, =urgaon if she 3anted to undergo "idne

    transplantation. ?hat person gae one moile phone numer

    and he tal"ed to accused (r. Amit 2umar. Accused (r. Amit

    2umar as"ed him to ring the patient and reports. ?he 3ent to

    !alam >ihar, =urgaon ut he did not rememer the numer of

    the uilding. ?he met accused (r. Amit 2umar and sho3ed

    him the reports. (r. Amit 2umar adised for "idne

    transplantation and he demanded amount of 7s.'.$$ lacs ut he

    refused, on 3hich the amount 3as settled at 7s.8.$$ lacs. He

    further stated that after matching of samples on 18th Januar,

    &$$8, he receied a telephone call from accused Amit 2umar,

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    14/199

    1@

    3ho adised aout the medicines to e ta"en and as"ed them to

    come on 1'th Januar, &$$8. 9n 1'th Januar, &$$8, in the

    morning, he, his 3ife and his daughter 7ama =arg 3ent to

    !alam >ihar, =urgaon. ?here 7ama =arg 3as ta"en to the first

    floor and the remained sitting in the asement. His daughter

    7ama =arg remained admitted for aout eleen-t3ele das.

    9n 1'thJanuar, &$$8, 7ama =arg 3as gien a drip and ta"en

    to the operation theatre and operation 3as done on that er

    da. Accused Amit 2umar 3as to perform the operation ut

    the 3ere not allo3ed to go into the operation theatre and

    therefore, he cannot sa 3ho actuall performed the operation.

    He paid the amount of 7s.8.$$ lacs to accused (r. Amit 2umar

    at his residence efore the operation. ?he "ne3 (r. Amit

    2umar, (r. pender 2umar and he cannot sa 3ho else

    assisted accused Amit 2umar in the operation. He further stated

    that after "idne transplantation, the remained in contact 3ith

    accused Amit 2umar regarding the medicines to e ta"en

    7ama =arg. He has seen accused Amit 2umar and pender

    2umar, 3ho are present in the court.

    During !ross-examination, he stated that the

    alleged transaction of pament of 7s.8.$$ lacs to accused Amit

    2umar him did not ta"e place in the presence of accused

    pender 2umar. He had seen on teleision the reports

    regarding arrest of accused persons in the alleged "idne scam.

    He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    15/199

    1II-Ne3 (elhi ut no such reference is

    there in letter ;:.!1@*+. He denied the suggestion that false

    report hae een sumitted them as per the directions of the

    CBI officers as per their suitailit in the case. He, ho3eer,

    denied the suggestion

    4:5 PW-1 5oginer Singh stated that he is 3or"ing as ront

    9ffice (ata ;ntr 9perator in ocus Imaging K 7esearch

    Centre C-1$ =reen !ar" ;:tension, Ne3 (elhi and (r. !rashant

    Sarin is its (irector. He further stated that patients under

    prescriptions from Shri 7am Hospital used to come for tests.

    ?he prescription 3ere of (r. pender 2umar. He further stated

    that in their centre, /7I, C.?.Scan, ltra-sound, -ra, ;cho-

    cardiograph 3ere conducted. ?he patients used to ma"e

    pament for the tests.

    4:i5 PW-1 Rakesh Dahiya, Drugs Contro* 6%%i!er, Pani7at

    stated that he is notified Inspector under Section &1 of (rugs K

    Cosmetics Act. In the ear &$$', he 3as posted as (istrict

    (rugs Inspector at =urgaon. 9n dated &%.$1.&$$', Ciil

    Surgeon (r. S.S.(alal called him in his office and gae a

    3ritten order ;:.!18*1 3hich 3as signed (r. S.S.(alal to

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    27/199

    &%

    (r. 2.S.7ao, (r. =ulshan Arora, (r. Satpal Bhanot and him to

    chec" the premises related to (r. Amit 2umar i.e. @+%@, Sector-

    &+, =urgaon regarding illegall "ept ultra-sound machine. ?he

    team also prepared a spot memo regarding the sealing of the

    aoesaid ultra-sound machine ;:.!18*&, 3hich ears his

    signature along3ith all the team memers. He stated that he

    prepared a list of 1% tpes of drugs on form-18 ;:.!18*+,

    3hich also ears his signature as 3ell as signature of other

    memers namel Shri 7.2.Singla, (r. =ulshan Arora and

    pulic 3itnesses Shri Sandeep and !unit. 9n &'.$1.&$$', he

    produced aoesaid seied drugs in the court of Chief Judicial

    /agistrate, =urgaon for their custod orders ide application

    ;:.!18*@ and custod order is ;:.!18*

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    28/199

    &'

    3ithout in the "no3ledge of Health authorities. He further

    stated that all the circumstances and material recoered

    reealed that there 3as a proision of transplantation of human

    "idnes.

    During !ross-examination,he stated that as

    per ;:.!18*1, there 3as no specific orders regarding search,

    inspection and seiure of house No.@+%@, Sector &+, =urgaon.

    He further stated that no call detail 3as demanded the CBI

    regarding conersation et3een him and Ciil Surgeon. No

    paper 3or" 3as done 3ith the police official 3ho 3as present

    efore entering into the uilding. He denied the suggestion that

    he neer isited the spot nor recoered anthing from the

    uildings. He denied the suggestion that the uilding in

    uestion used for hospital 3as a residential uilding. He denied

    the suggestion that all the documents 3ere prepared the CBI

    in the office and got his signatures there. He denied the

    suggestion that he is deposing falsel at the ehest of the CBI.

    4:ii5 PW-1 Suriner Pa* Singh stated that he is 3or"ing as A=/

    4Commercial5 3ith the Airtel. He had purchased flat No.&$@,

    Second loor, >alle >ie3 ;state, =urgaon aridaad road,

    =urgaon for 7s.&&.< lacs from Ansals in the ear &$$8. He had

    rented out this flat through Anil Bajpai to ash !al Sharma

    4Since died5 in 9ctoer, &$$8 at the rent of 7s.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    29/199

    &)

    !al Sharma and /r. Bajpai. ?he rent deed 3as for 11 months

    and it 3as rene3ed on &1.$).&$$% for another 11 months on

    same terms and conditions. He has seen the original rent deed

    ;:.!1%*1 dated &1.).&$$%, 3hich ears his signature as 3ell

    as that of ash !al Sharma and Anil Bajpai. 9n @.&.&$$', he

    had got a call from /r. =ogan, Securit 9fficer of the Societ

    informing him that four laourers 3ere residing in his flat, 3ho

    had undergone "idne transplant operation and the 3ere

    demanding the fare. He tried to contact ash !al Sharma.

    Ho3eer, he could not e contacted. He contacted /r.Bajpai to

    isit the flat, 3ho after isiting the flat informed him the four

    laourers present at the flat 3ere demanding fare. 9n %.&.&$$',

    police officials isited his house at Chandigarh. He further

    stated that on '.&.&$$', he made the statement efore the

    police. In /arch, &$$', CBI officers had recorded his

    statement. He had produced mar" !1%*A and ;:.!1%*1

    efore CBI 9fficers.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that stamp

    papers of ;:.!1%*1 are dated1'.).&$$8. He denied the

    suggestion that the lease deed is forged and faricated and has

    een prepared at the instance of the CBI. He also denied the

    suggestion that he had not rented out the flat to .!.Sharma. He

    further stated that he had isited CBI office and he had not

    handed oer an document regarding his o3nership to CBI. He

    has also not rought an such document on that da.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    30/199

    +$

    4:iii5 PW-10 8u!ky #arg stated that she is !hd. in histor. She 3as

    married 3ith 7aji =arg on 1%.@.&$$@. She is haing a fie

    ears old son. She 3as suffering from high lood-pressure and

    due to high lood-pressure, oth of her "idnes 3ere damaged.

    She has to ta"e regular dialsis from /eerut. ?he doctor

    adised her to get "idne transplant as her condition 3as

    ecoming 3orse. She could not get "idne from her relaties.

    She had no parental relaties. No one told her regarding

    transplantation of "idne from an3here against pament.

    (uring her isit to hospital at /eerut, other parents told her that

    there 3as a doctor in =urgaon, 3ho transplant the "idne. ?he

    person gae a moile numer to her husand. As such that

    time, her condition 3as getting deteriorated, then her husand

    contacted 3ith the doctor at =urgaon for transplantation of

    "idne. ?hereafter, the 3ent (elhi and thereafter, her husand

    contacted the person. She ecame unconscious and thereafter

    3hat happened, she cannot tell. No doctor met her and her

    husand at (elhi and aridaad. Her husand rought her for

    dialsis to (elhi. It 3as not in her "no3ledge that she has een

    ta"en for "idne transplantation. hen she regained

    consciousness, she found herself in Shri =anga 7am Hospital,

    (elhi. 9n the reuest of learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness

    3as also declared hostile and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as

    allo3ed to cross e:amine this 3itness. (uring cross

    e:amination, contents of statement ;:.!1'*A 3ere put to her

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    31/199

    +1

    3ord 3ord ut she refused to o3n the contents of the

    statement and stated that she neer made such statement to the

    police. She 3as also confronted 3ith portions A to A, B to B, C

    to C and ( to ( of her statement ;:.!1'*A, ut she denied

    haing made such statement to the police. (espite length cross

    e:amination, learned !ulic !rosecutor has failed to e:tract

    anthing incriminating against the accused from the mouth of

    this 3itness. She, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.

    4:i:5 PW-1 Rai+ #arg stated that he did /Sc in /ath and he 3as

    married 3ith 0uc" =arg on 1%.$@.&$$@. He also corroorated

    the stand of !-1' 0uc" =arg his 3ife and toed the line of

    !-1' 0uc" =arg.

    During !ross-examination, he stated that the

    condition of his 3ife 3as not improed at the time of recording

    her statement also. He admitted that 3hateer scried the

    CBI or the police officials, he signed the same. ?he contents of

    the statement 3ere not read oer and e:plained to him. (uring

    cross-e:amination !! for the CBI, he admitted that the CBI

    officials did not isit in Shri =anga 7am Hospital. He 3as full

    conscious 3hen he signed the statement ;:.!1'*A. He

    further stated that the statement 3as not read oer to him. He

    did not ma"e an complaint to an authorit regarding his

    signatures otained on the statement 3ithout disclosing the

    contents. He further admitted that all the contents recorded in

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    32/199

    +&

    the statement regarding treatment 3ere told him to the

    police.

    4::5 PW-2 'a+ee7 Singh stated that his father 3as suffering

    from "idne prolem since the ear &$$8 and he 3as on

    dialsis for the last t3o ears. ?he had tried for transplantation

    of his "idne of Shri =anga 7am Hospital, Ne3 (elhi ut since

    there 3as a hereditar prolem, so transplantation 3as not

    possile. He further stated there 3as one "no3n (entist, 3ho

    adised them that there is one doctor namel (r. Amit, 3ho

    could do "idne transplantation legall after arranging donor

    himself and this "idne transplantation 3as alid in Harana.

    He too" him to (0, =urgaon in the house of accused (r. Amit

    2umar. (r. Amit after going through the medical papers of his

    father assured that their jo 3ill e done. He demanded a sum

    of 7s.1

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    33/199

    ++

    in the IC. He too" his father to 7oc"land Hospital and

    admitted him there. After 1

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    34/199

    +@

    Ne3 (elhi for treatment. He further stated that he had also used

    to go (r. 7am /anohar Hospital, (elhi for follo3 up treatment.

    After follo3 up treatment, no prolem persisted and he used to

    ta"e medicines. He 3as adised for "idne transplantation. His

    rother-in-la3 accused Saraj 2umar 2oind 3as 3or"ing as

    (octor in (r. 7am /anohar 0ohia Hospital. He further stated

    no one told him that there 3as some doctor, 3ho transplants

    "idnes. He had no telephone numer of an person, 3ho

    adised him for "idne transplantation. 9n the reuest of

    learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also declared hostile

    and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to cross e:amine

    this 3itness. (uring cross e:amination, contents of statement

    ;:.!&1*A 3ere put to him 3ord 3ord ut he refused to

    o3n the contents of the statement and stated that he neer made

    such statement to the police. He 3as also confronted 3ith

    portions A to A, B to B, C to C, ( to (, ; to ; and to of his

    statement ;:.!&1*A, ut he denied haing made such

    statement to the police. (espite length cross e:amination,

    learned !ulic !rosecutor has failed to e:tract anthing

    incriminating against the accused from the mouth of this

    3itness. He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.

    4::ii5 PW-22 Dr. 3amta Ko+in stated that she passed /BBS from

    2anpur niersit in the ear 1))'. She is doing priate

    practice. She 3as married to accused Saraj 2umar in the ear

    1))). He also passed /BBS from 2anpur niersit. He

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    35/199

    +ihar to conduct the /07 of Sha"eel, Nasim

    and Salim 2han. She e:amined all the three. 9n

    e:amination of Sha"eel, she found that she had incision on

    left lumer region, dressed, 1$ stitches in numer. Injuries

    3ere 3ithin four das, "ept under oseration, adised ultra-

    sound and -ra on 3hole adomen including "idne, ureter

    and ladder 42B5 and he adised surgeonFs opinion. She

    further stated that patient had alleged histor of

    nephrectom on &+.1.&$$' 4surgical remoal of "idne5 at

    un"no3n place. She had issued /07 ;:.!&

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    41/199

    @1

    signature of Sha"eel on ;:.!&

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    42/199

    @&

    him and she confirmed nephrectom i.e. remoal of one

    "idne of each patient.

    During !ross-examination, she admitted that in

    all the /0Cs, she had not mentioned the dimension of the

    incision mar" as she 3as not carring an scale. She

    admitted that she cannot tell the dimension of the incision

    mar" osered her on the patientFs od. She, ho3eer,

    denied the suggestions.

    4::i5 PW-2 Sa*im stated that he is illiterate. He had een

    summoned in a case pertaining to "idne. He 3as

    unconscious and did not "no3 3hat happened 3ith him.

    hen he regained consciousness, he found that his adomen

    had een andaged. He did not ma"e an inuir from an

    one aout the andage. hen he had regained

    consciousness, he found himself in the =ot. hospital. He

    did not "no3 the place 3here that =ot. Hospital 3as

    situated. He 3as discharged from the hospital after @-< das

    inspite of the fact that he 3as not 3ell. It too" him more

    than si: months to recoer slightl. He did not "no3 from

    3here he 3as oarded us after discharge from the hospital

    as his mother had ta"en him. His mother had come to "no3

    aout the incident from ?C. He cannot tell the time ta"en in

    the journe from the hospital to his home as he 3as not in

    proper condition. He cannot sa 3hether it had ta"en one

    hour or ten hours in journe. He had a scuffle at Bagpath

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    43/199

    @+

    Bus Stand in /eerut and he along3ith seeral others 3ere

    pic"ed up the police and thereafter, he found himself in

    the hospital. He did not "no3 3hether his "idne 3as

    remoed or not. He 3as not interrogated in this regard eer.

    His statement 3as not recorded the CBI at an point of

    time. He had made a statement efore a Judge at =urgaon as

    he 3as ta"en the police officials in the court and 3as

    threatened to ma"e a statement as per their directions and

    3ill. His that statement 3as not oluntar. 9n the reuest of

    learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also declared

    hostile and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to cross

    e:amine this 3itness. (uring cross e:amination, contents of

    statement ;:.!&8*1 3ere put to him 3ord 3ord ut he

    refused to o3n the contents of the statement and stated that

    he neer made such statement to the police. He 3as also

    confronted 3ith portion A to A1, B to B1, C to C1, ( to (1,

    ; to ;1, = to =1, H to H1, I to I1, J to J1 of his statement

    ;:.!&8*1, ut he denied haing made such statement to

    the police. (espite length cross e:amination, learned

    !ulic !rosecutor has failed to e:tract anthing

    incriminating against the accused from the mouth of this

    3itness. He has seen his statement ;:.!&8*& recorded

    the /agistrate on +1.$1.&$$' at =urgaon. He admitted that

    the /agistrate had recorded his statement correctl as stated

    him. He identified his photos 3hich 3ere ta"en in the

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    44/199

    @@

    =ot. hospital and the same are ;:.!&8*+ to ;:.!&8*8.

    He admitted that all the four photographs 3ere depicting the

    stitch mar"s and andages on his adomen. He admitted that

    he is not feeling 3ell. He further admitted that he ma e not

    feeling 3ell due to remoal of his "idne. He further stated

    that he had neer isited or remained admitted in an

    hospital or an "othi in =urgaon. He, ho3eer, denied the

    suggestions.

    4::ii5 PW-2 Da*i7 stated that originall he elong to illage

    Badli ?andla district 7ampur, 4!5. He had changed his

    name after a pulication in the ne3spaper. Aout @-< ears

    ac", 3hen he 3as sleeping at 2oria Bridge near ISB?, &-+

    policemen along3ith +-@ other officials in the plain clothes

    3ere pic"ing up some persons, 3ho 3ere sleeping and gae

    them danda lo3s. ?he had pic"ed up @-< persons. ?he

    had chec"ed the adomens of seeral persons and

    3hosoeer 3as haing some mar" of surger on adomen

    3as ta"en them and rest 3ere let off. He 3as also ta"en

    along them as he 3as also haing surger mar"s on his

    adomen. He 3as haing the prolem of stone in his "idne

    as he 3as in the hait of ta"ing liuor freuentl and he had

    undergone an operation for remoal of the stone 1

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    45/199

    @ to >1, to 1, to

    1 and to 1 of his statement ;:.!&'*@, ut he denied

    haing made such statement to the police. (espite length

    cross e:amination, learned !ulic !rosecutor has failed to

    e:tract anthing incriminating against the accused from the

    mouth of this 3itness. He has also seen his statement mar"

    !&'*A 3hich is ;:.!&'*A1. He 3as also confronted

    3ith portion A to A1, B to B1, C to C1, ( to (1, ; to ;1, =

    to =1, H to H1, I to I1,J to J1 of his statement mar"

    !&'*A, ut he denied haing made such statement to the

    police. (espite length cross e:amination, learned !ulic

    !rosecutor has failed to e:tract anthing incriminating

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    48/199

    @'

    against the accused from the mouth of this 3itness. He,

    ho3eer, denied the suggestions.

    4::i:5 PW-2 Sanay /harga+ stated that he is 3or"ing as

    Chartered Accountant at (elhi. He got himself chec"-up in

    (elhi and he 3as told that oth of his "idnes are not

    3or"ing properl. He also got treatment ut he 3as adised

    that either there 3ill dialsis or transplantation of "idne is

    the onl solution. ?here 3as no proper donor in his famil.

    hen he 3ent for dialsis, one /r. =arg met him, 3ho gae

    the reference of accused (r. Amit. /r. =arg too" him to

    =urgaon. He told him that his daughter had got

    transplantation from accused (r. Amit. He met (r. Amit. He

    told him that the transplantation of "idne 3as possile in

    Harana. He agreed to his proposal. He called him on &)th

    June, &$$%. He did not meet him et3een the interening

    period. He did not rememer 3hether his signatures 3ere

    otained the doctor on an paper or not. He further stated

    that no lood sample 3as ta"en from him for an test. (ue

    to injection, he ecame unconscious. He further stated that

    after operation, he 3as ta"en to IC. He did not rememer

    eing he 3as semi conscious. He remained three das in the

    IC. ?hereafter, he 3as discharged from the hospital. He

    identified onl (r. Amit. ?hereafter, he 3as discharged from

    the hospital. He 3as prescried medicines after his

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    49/199

    @)

    operation. He paid 7s.1& lacs in cash on the da of his

    operation.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that

    accused Amit 3as sho3n to him in the CBI office first time

    and identified him in the court. He, ho3eer, denied the

    suggestions.

    4:::5 PW-" 3ayank 3ahesh$ari stated that he is a cloth

    merchant. His elder sister 7uchi Bala /ahesh3ari 3as

    suffering from "idne failure. She regular had pain on her

    ac" after delier. ?he dialsis of his sister remained

    continued in Apollo Hospital. He identified accused /anoj

    and Amit. He got discharged his sister on his ris" and she

    3as shifted him in 7am /urti Hospital at Barell. At

    Barell also, doctor adised to remoe the transplanted

    "idne. hen he 3as in Barell, he receied a telephone call

    from CBI officer. He identified onl (r. Amit and /anoj.

    ?hereafter, his sister e:pired.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that

    statement 3hich 3as sho3n to him the CBI officials outside

    the court efore ma"ing statement efore the court the same

    does not ear signature of him as 3ell as signature of CBI

    official 3ho had 3ritten this statement. He, ho3eer, denied the

    suggestions.

    4:::i5PW-"1 9ikas Aggar$a* stated that his mother-in-la3

    /adhuli"a =upta 3as suffering from "idne failure. She had

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    50/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    51/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    52/199

    ihar, =urgaon.

    He has seen the ed head tic"et No.Cr-1&1@ of Naseem, the

    same is ;:.!++*1. His opinion in the file is ;:.!++*& dated

    &

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    53/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    54/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    55/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    56/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    57/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    58/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    59/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    60/199

    8$

    No.@+%@ is ;:.!+'*8. ?he true cop of the said seiure memo

    is ;:.!+'*%. He further stated that as per the record of the

    H(A, Ameet 2umar is the o3ner of the house No.@+%@,

    Sector-&+, =urgaon.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that 3hen

    permission to mortgage 3as sought from the office of H(A, it

    is onl for the purpose of otaining loan from the an". He

    admitted that there is no complaint regarding an commercial

    actiities in the said house No.@+%@, Sector &+, =urgaon efore

    &).1.&$$' and

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    61/199

    81

    405 PW-& Amu*ya Prasa stated that the plot 3as originall

    allotted to Shri (hirender Singh (utta ide their allotment letter

    dated &1.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    62/199

    8&

    7s.&$ lacs 3as paid ide (( No.1%%%&8 dated 1ihar, !hase-I, (elhi. He further

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    63/199

    8+

    stated that this compan used to proide serice of entilators

    multi-parameter monitors, sringe pump etc. In Januar, he had

    gone to lat No.@+%@, !alam >ihar, =urgaon on the directions

    of the compan for repairing of entilator model Sero +$$,

    ho3eer, he could not repair the said entilator as it 3as

    eond his capailit.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that a jo

    card is prepared for an serice or complaint made in the

    compan. He further admitted that in that jo card, signatures of

    the customer is also otained as 3ell as the person to 3hom the

    said complaint has een for3arded for compliance put his

    signature.

    40III5PW-&" 9i7in Cha4a stated that he is partner of /*S A>/

    Surgicare Inc. 1

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    64/199

    8@

    along3ith summar of inoices ;:.!@+*) to Inspector, CBI,

    Ne3 (elhi, 3ho seied the same ide seiure memo

    ;:.!@+*1$, 3hich ears his signature. He further stated that

    he still hae to receie alance pament of 7s.1,&),8&'*- from

    0iert Health Care as the cheue mar" !@+*A could not e

    encashed as the account of /*S 0iert Health Care had een

    seied in connection 3ith a criminal case.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that prior

    to &$$', there 3as no transaction 3ith Jeean 2umar. He

    admitted that no document 3as signed as 3ell as stamped

    their office or him prior to handing oer the same to the CBI.

    He further admitted that the originals of these inoices are in

    his custod and the same has not een rought him. He

    further admitted that no plot numers hae een mentioned in

    the inoices. He admitted that the inoices in uestion are

    computer generated documents. He admitted that the retail

    inoices ;:.!@+*1 to ;:.!@+*) does not ear receiing of

    an part. He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.

    40I>5 PW-&& P.S.Pan!h7a*, 3otor 8i!en!ing 6%%i!er, West

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    65/199

    85 PW-& Ranhir singh stated that he is one of the (irectors of

    /*S ?7I?9N /edical Serices !t. 0td. %*&$& 4IInd loor5,

    Ne3 (elhi. He further stated that this compan 3as estalished

    in the ear 1))$ and deals in sale and serices of medical

    euipments mainl dialsis euipment and accessories of

    arious rands. He further stated that the had sold the said

    machine to man hospitals including 0iert Health Care ''%@,

    Sector &+, !alam >ihar =urgaon. He further stated that the sale

    inoices are ;:.!@

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    67/199

    8%

    approached him for the purpose of purchase of euipments of

    dialsis normall. He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.

    40>I5 PW-& Ramesh Ka7oor stated that he is one of the partners of

    /*S 9/A ;ngineering or"s,

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    68/199

    8'

    ;:.!@8*%, one 9*? light moile 3as sold to /*S 0iert

    Health Care plot No.@%)+, Sector &+, =urgaon. He identified

    his signatures on ;:.!@8*& to ;:.!@8*% as the same hae

    een issued him. He further stated that the paments 3ere

    made accused Amit cash as 3ell as cheue. He rightl

    identified accused Amit.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that in

    that statement, all the orders regarding 3hich all the inoices,

    3hich hae een sho3n to him in the court, orders for such

    purchase of goods 3ere made onl through telephone. He

    admitted that all the orders 3ere placed through telephone. He

    further admitted that as per retail inoices sho3n to him in the

    court, pament 3as supposed to e receied from the part

    either through cheue*an" draft or account paee cheue onl

    as mentioned in retail inoices. He further admitted that this

    condition does not find mention in these retail inoices.

    40>II5 PW-& Rashmi aughter o% Shri Ra+iner Singh stated that

    he has done /.!hil in ;nglish. He 3as suffering from S0; due

    to 3hich his "idne 3as damaged. He 3as ta"ing treatment in

    AII/S, Ne3 (elhi from (r. Aggar3al, Nephrologist. (r.

    Aggar3al adised him that ultimate treatment is "idne

    transplantation and it is etter that the same e done

    immediatel efore dialsis. He further stated that (r. !ardeep

    2umar 3as loo"ing after his dialsis. (uring that period, he

    had reduced his 3eight from @$ "gs. to &8 2gs. and 3as under

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    69/199

    8)

    depression. His father too" him for "idne transplantation

    some3here in (elhi. He cannot identif the doctor, 3ho

    conducted his "idne transplantation. He did not meet an

    doctor, 3ho conducted his "idne transplantation. In IC, some

    nurses 3ere present ut he could not identif anone. 9n the

    reuest of learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also

    declared hostile and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to

    cross e:amine this 3itness. (uring cross e:amination, the

    contents of statement mar" !@%*A 3ere put to her 3ord

    3ord ut she refused to o3n the contents of the statement and

    stated that she neer made such statement to the CBI. She 3as

    also confronted 3ith portion A to A, B to B, C to C, ( to ( and

    ; to ; of his statement mar" !@%*A, ut she denied haing

    made such statement to the CBI.

    (>89===) PW-&0 Ra+iner Singh ?omar state that his daughter

    7ashmi ?omar 3as suffering from "idne prolem. She 3as on

    dialsis in Jas3ant 7ai Hospital due to her deteriorate

    condition. 9ne ard o in Jas3ant 7ai Hospital told him that

    one 7ajesh had got "idne transplanted from (elhi. He

    contacted him in the hospital. He and his daughter accompanied

    him in his car. He 3ent to /ehrauli, (elhi. He did not "no3

    an doctor namel pender. 7ajesh told him that the total

    e:penses for "idne transplantation is aout 7s.&,$$,$$$*-. 9n

    the reuest of learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also

    declared hostile and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    70/199

    %$

    cross e:amine this 3itness. (uring cross e:amination, the

    contents of statement mar" !@'*A 3ere put to him 3ord

    3ord ut he refused to o3n the contents of the statement and

    stated that he neer made such statement to the CBI. He 3as

    also confronted 3ith portion A to A of his statement mar"

    !@'*A, ut he denied haing made such statement to the CBI.

    (>8=>) PW-& Shaki* stated that he has seen his statement ;:.!1*1

    recorded the /agistrate, 3hich ears his signature. He stated

    that he 3as ta"en to Ciil Hospital for treatment at the Ciil

    Hospital 3here !ress and !olice people 3ere present. His

    photographs are mar" !@)*A to !@)*(. He identified his

    3riting and signature, 3hich is ;:.!@)*& on ed head tic"et

    mar" !@)*;. He further stated that on that da, he "ne3 that

    his "idne 3as remoed (r. Amit as it has appeared on the

    paper and on ?>. He had seen (r. Amit on the teleision for the

    first time. He further stated that the man, 3ho administered him

    injection is not present in the court. He did not see (r. Amit in

    the hospital 3herein his "idne 3as remoed. 9n the reuest of

    learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also declared hostile

    and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to cross e:amine

    this 3itness. (uring cross e:amination, the contents of

    statement mar" !@)* 3ere put to him 3ord 3ord ut he

    refused to o3n the contents of the statement and stated that he

    neer made such statement to the CBI. He 3as also confronted

    3ith portion A to A1 and B to B1of his statement mar" !@)*,

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    71/199

    %1

    ut he denied haing made such statement to the CBI. He,

    ho3eer, denied the suggestions.

    (8) PW- Smt. Surner Ka7oor stated that she did B.Sc and

    diploma in /edical 0a ?echnolog. In the ear &$$%, she 3as

    3or"ing as 0a ?echnician in Batra Hospital, Ne3 (elhi. ?his

    la is specialied in tissue tping test and (r. /.C.>aida is the

    Head of the 0a and this la is controlled Batra Hospital. (r.

    /.C.>aida is the Honourar Consultant. He used to receie

    lood samples of the recipients and donors along3ith the H0A

    form. heneer, he used to receie the H0A form along3ith

    samples, he used to get an endorsement signed from the person,

    3ho rings the sample and get his signature in his presence.

    H0A forms are ;:.!

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    72/199

    %&

    ;:.!

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    73/199

    %+

    further stated that in H0A form ;:.!

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    74/199

    %@

    that his life choice is onl 1$ and he adised him to undergo

    ne3 "idne transplantation. He told him that total e:penses for

    the "idne transplantation 3ill e 7s.%.< lacs and (r. Amit told

    him that he 3ill do eerthing. He told him that he do not hae

    that much amount and to reduce the amount. ?hen, he agreed

    for 7s.@.< lacs. He also agreed for that amount. Ne:t morning,

    (r. Amit called for dialsis. He further stated that operation 3as

    conducted in the second house 3here he 3as e:amined (r.

    Amit. He did not "no3 the e:act name of the place or localit

    3here he 3as operated. ?he operation too" aout three hours.

    He 3as there in the hospital for aout @-< das under the

    superision of (r. Amit. He further stated that he 3as

    discharged after fie das from the hospital. (r. Amit did not

    demand an mone from him. He met one more person, 3ho

    had supposed to hae operated for "idne transplantation. He

    cannot identif accused Amit in the court. He further stated that

    he handed oer the preious treatment record of his "idne

    transplantation to the CBI ide seiure memo ;:.!

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    75/199

    %) Dr. 9anana 8a*, stated that she did /BBS and /( in

    !atholog. She is the ;:ecutie (irector of 0al !ath 0a

    haing office of ;s"a House, Ne3 (elhi. She further stated

    that the are haing 1$$ las and oer &

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    82/199

    '&

    the letter ;:.!

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    83/199

    '+

    ;:.!8$*1, 3ho 3ere referred to him and this letter ears

    his signature. ?he detail is :x.PW2 to :x.PW&&

    3hich ears his signature and initials. He further stated that

    these tests are general tests and are not conducted specificall

    for "idne transplantation ut can e roadl used to

    determine pre-operatie status and fitness for surger of an

    ailment.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that the

    name of the doctors as mentioned in ;:.!8$*& to

    ;:.!8$*@@ haing different spellings of names ma e of

    different persons.

    (8>=) PW-1 Data Ram has stated that he is 3or"ing as Senior

    ?echnical Assistant in the office of 7egistrar of Compan

    (elhi. He did not rememer aout the letter of CBI receied

    in their office. Ho3eer, the same 3as handed oer their

    official namel 7.2.Shah Assistant 7egistrar of Companies,

    NC? of (elhi and Harana to the CBI. He had 3or"ed 3ith

    Shri 7.2.Shah and is conersant 3ith his signature. ?he

    documents are ;:.!81*1 to ;:.!81*+'. ?he detail and

    information 3hich are reuired has een gien in ;:.!81*1

    to ;:.!81*+'. He further stated that the certificate of

    incorporation ;:.!81*& is of 0iert Health Care !t. 0td.

    and ;:.!81*+ is memorandum of registration and

    ;:.!81*@ is article of registration of hospital and the

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    84/199

    '@

    remaining documents are relating to the reuirements of

    incorporation.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that

    their department neer erifies 3hether the firm is in

    e:istence or not.

    (8>==) PW-2 Dee7ak Puri has stated that their compan namel

    N.2.Jain Instrument !t. 0td. haing trade mar" 0aomed

    manufacture different "inds of microscope. He is 3or"ing as

    Salesman in this compan. He further stated that aout fie

    ears ac", t3o persons 3ho 3ere carring a isiting card in

    the name of Jeean 2umar came to their factor for

    purchasing microscope and the as"ed for purchasing a

    /icroscope and the gae them catalogs of all the products

    and the selected one Inerted /icroscope, the cost of 3hich

    3as 7s.1,1%,&

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    85/199

    '===) PW-" Dr. /.P.5ohny has stated that he is /BBS, (/7(

    and /(. He 3as running a clinic at 2aparshera. He further

    stated that in et3een the ear 1))=9) PW-& A4rar Khan stated that he is 3or"ing as (ialsis

    technician since 1))' at /odi Hospital Sa"et, Ne3 (elhi. He

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    86/199

    '8

    further stated that in the ear &$$&, he had met Jeean in

    general as friend. (r. Jeean told that he 3as running a hospital

    for dialsis. He has also gien him his moile numer 3hich he

    did not rememer. As a friend, he used to tal" to him on his

    moile numer freuentl in general. 9nce or t3ice, the had

    the reuirement of technician for dialsis, then the had

    contacted him ut he is regular emploee of =/ /odi

    Hospital, Ne3 (elhi. He had conducted ' to 1$ dialsis in the

    ear &$$+, 3hen he 3as called accused Jeean at dialsis

    Centre, Sector-&+, =urgaon. He further stated that there 3ere

    t3o dialsis machines in the dialsis centre. ;erthing 3as

    aailale 3hich 3as reuired for dialsis for a patient in the

    dialsis centre. He did not "no3 3ho is the /anager of that

    dialsis Centre. No lood sample 3as eer ta"en in his

    presence. ?here used to e no doctor. 9n the reuest of learned

    !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also declared hostile and

    learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to cross e:amine this

    3itness. (uring cross e:amination !!, the contents of

    statement ;:.!8@*A 3ere put to him 3ord 3ord ut he

    refused to o3n the contents of the statement and stated that he

    neer made such statement to the CBI. He 3as also confronted

    3ith portion A to A, B to B, C to C, ( to ( and ; to ; of his

    statement ;:.!8@*A, ut he denied haing made such

    statement to the CBI.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    87/199

    '%

    (8>9)PW- /harat /hushan stated that he is 3or"ing as

    Administratie officer in (r. 7am /anohar 0ohia Hospital,

    Ne3 (elhi since 1st9ctoer, &$1$. He 3as neer associated in

    the inestigation of the CBI in this case. He further stated that

    the CBI had not ta"en in possession an record from him ut

    the same 3as ta"en in possession from his predecessor Shri

    Anil 2umar. He had 3or"ed 3ith Shri Anil 2umar, ;:. (eput

    (irector Administration and he is conersant 3ith his signature.

    He further stated that the memo regarding details of leae*dut

    of /s. 0inda Chinneihoih Staff Nurse is ;:.!8

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    88/199

    ''

    on %.1.&$$', 3hich 3as allo3ed upto &&.$1.&$$' as per record.

    It 3as not in his "no3ledge as to 3hether father of /s. 0inda

    had e:pired on %.1.&$$' and for that reason, she had applied

    leae and for that reason, she had gone to her natie place at

    /anipur 4;ast State5.

    (8>9=)PW- Par+een Kumar 3itta* stated that he is 3or"ing as

    Account Assistant at Sadha3na Hospital, Ballahgarh in the

    ear &$$% for t3o months and 1% das. (r. Archana 3ife of (r.

    pender 3as the proprietor of this hospital. (r. Archana

    along3ith famil used to reside on the second floor of the said

    hospital. He 3as doing the jo of deposit of electricit and

    other ills etc. He used to receie the telephone of (r. pender

    ut he did not "no3 3hether (r. pender had otained an

    loan from an an" or not. He "ne3 !areen /angla, Jas3ant

    Singh, (r. Archana as emploed in Sadha3na Hospital. (r.

    pender had called in the cain of (r. Archana and he had

    gien him lan" H0A forms and as"ed him to fill-up the name

    and addresses of the patients. (r. pender had ta"en out a spiral

    diar from 3hich he had dictated the names and addresses of

    the recipients and donors. ?he H0A forms ;:.!

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    89/199

    ')

    for ma"ing copies of the photographs and handed oer the same

    to (r. pender. He identified (r. pender present in the court.

    During !ross-examination, he stated that the CBI

    officer did not otain his signature and hand-3riting for

    comparison. He did not rememer all the 3or"s did 3ith

    Sadha3na Hospital. He is 3or"ing 3ith the !ropert (ealer.

    !rior to this jo, he had furnished his io-data 3ith regard to his

    serice record and histor to his preious emploer. He had no

    3here disclosed in his iodata furnished for getting the jo that

    he 3as eer emploed 3ith Sadha3na Hospital or (r.

    pender. He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.

    (8>9==)PW- Suni* Kumar has stated that he did BSc and diploma

    in (/0? and is 3or"ing as technician in AI/S, Ne3 (elhi

    since 1))). He further stated that he had conducted the H0A

    tests of &$ patients*donors. He further stated that he isited onl

    &-+ times and used to go to the la on the as"ing of mesh. He

    further stated that onl the reports mentioned in ;:.!8%*1 to

    ;:.!8%*&$ 3ere prepared him. He had not receied an

    mone 3ith regard to this 3or" eing the raid 3as conducted

    the police. He cannot identif an of the accused present in

    the court.

    During !ross-examination, he stated that there

    might e numer of petrol pumps in Sector-&+ =urgaon ut he

    can recognie onl one petrol pump, in case, he isited the spot.

    He accompanied CBI officers t3ice in the uilding, 3here he

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    90/199

    )$

    had 3or"ed. He further stated that his specimen hand-

    3riting*signature*thum-impressions 3ere otained the CBI

    9fficers ut no record is aailale 3ith the CBI. He, ho3eer,

    denied the suggestion.

    (8>9===) PW-0 Dimngai!hing ?hangsing B Din 'gari!hing Simte

    stated that she completed her three ears diploma in =eneral

    Nursing and /id3ife from Assam in the ear &$$+. She further

    stated that she 3or"ed as a Nurse at oodland Hospital,

    Shillong for aout si: months. She further stated that thereafter,

    she shifted to (elhi 3here she 3or"ed at Sood /edical Centre,

    (elhi Cantonment Area for aout three ears. ?hereafter, she

    3or"ed in ?hialand. She further stated that she neer 3or"ed in

    Starma: Hospital, !alam >ihar, Sector-&+ =urgaon. She "ne3

    accused 0inda present in the court as the are from the same

    natie place i.e. /anipur. /s. 0inda is*3as 3or"ing at 7/0

    Hospital, Ne3 (elhi as Staff Nurse. She did not "no3 after

    7/0 hospital 3here she had 3or"ed. 9n the reuest of learned

    !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also declared hostile and

    learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to cross e:amine this

    3itness. (uring cross e:amination, the contents of statement

    mar" !8'*A 3ere put to her 3ord 3ord ut she refused to

    o3n the contents of the statement and stated that she neer

    made such statement to the CBI. She 3as also confronted 3ith

    portion A to A of her statement mar" !8'*A, ut she denied

    haing made such statement to the CBI.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    91/199

    )1

    (8>=>) PW- Dr.P.R.Sharma, Se!retary Centra* Coun!i* o% =nian

    3ei!ines, 'e$ De*hi stated that he is 3or"ing as 7egistrar-

    cum-Secretar and their office maintained central register of

    Indian /edicines. He further stated that the CBI 9fficer had

    made an inuir from him regarding registration of accused

    7aut Santosh 7amesh3ar and he had gien his information ide

    letter ;:.!8)*1, 3hich ears his signature. He had also gien

    the e:tract of the register cop of 3hich is ;:.!8)*& and the

    name of accused 7aut Santosh 7amesh3ar figured at serial

    No.%%'>) PW- Dr. Da*i7 ;ttam Rao Wange, Registrar,

    3aharashtra Coun!i* o% =nian 3ei!ines, 3um4ai stated

    that he is posted as 7egistrar /aharashtra Council of Indian

    /edicines, /umai. He had gien the cop of the =aette

    notification of /aharashtra ;:.!%$*1 running in t3o pages

    and receipt ;:.!%$*&.

    (8>>=) PW-1 Dr.S.S.Da*a* stated that he 3as posted as Ciil

    Surgeon, =urgaon since +.@.&$$%. ?he notification ;:.!&+*1

    4alread e:hiited5 3as also issued the Health (epartment,

    =oernment of Harana. He also proed the notifications

    ;:.!&+*+ and ;:.!&+*@ 4alread e:hiited5. 9n the reuest

    of =urgaon police, he along3ith (r. Ashrudeen /edical

    Superintendent of =H, =urgaon, (r. S.!.Bhanot, (r. S.!.ada

    of !ushpanjali Hospital, =urgaon isited the hospital of (r.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    92/199

    )&

    Amit in the night of &@ th Januar, &$$' and three operated

    patients namel Naseem, Saleem and Sha"il 3ere found in the

    hospital, 3hich 3ere shifted to =eneral Hospital, =urgaon

    under the care of (r. S.!.Bhanot Surgeon for further

    inestigation, the information of 3hich 3as sent to (=HS,

    Harana ide letter ;:.!%1*1, 3hich ears his signature.

    ?hen on &%.$1.&$$', he constituted a team of doctors namel

    (r. 2.S.7ao, the then amil elfare 9fficer. =urgaon, (r.

    =ulshan Arora, Senior /edical 9fficer, =H, =urgaon, (r. Sat

    !al Bhanot, =eneral Surgeon, =urgaon and Shri 7a"esh

    (ahia, (istrict (rug Inspector, =urgaon to isit for the

    inspection and search and seiure of the machine under the

    !N(? K (rugs and Cosmetics Act. ?he letter is ;:.!%1*&,

    3hich ears his signature.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that as per

    notification dated &

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    93/199

    )+

    3or"ing as Surgeon in 7ohta" /edical College, since 1)''. He

    further stated that the =oernment of Harana had notified

    (irector, !=I, /S, 7ohta" as appropriate authorit for districts

    7ohta", Bhi3ani, Sonepat, Jhajjar, 7e3ari, =urgaon and

    aridaad ide notification dated &

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    94/199

    )@

    sealed 3hen produced efore this court. He, ho3eer, denied

    the suggestions.

    (8>>===) PW-" Dr. 9ikram Ka*ra stated that in the ear &$$', he 3as

    3or"ing in 7oc"land Hospital, Ne3 (elhi since &$$

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    95/199

    )>=9) PW-& Dr. 9.'.Sharma stated that he is Chairman,

    Antiuac"r, I/A, HP (elhi. CBI had as"ed to furnish

    information as to 3hether accused are competent prescried

    and practice the surger as 3ell as the modern sstem of

    allopath or not. He has gien the information in the form of

    letter ;:.!%@*1, 3hich ears his signature and also the

    signature of (r. (.7.7ai. He further stated that a judgment

    deliered full court of HonFle Supreme Court in case of

    /u"htiar Chand >s. State of !unja and others in the CA

    No.') of 1)'% and also a gaette notification dated 8.@.&$$&

    3ere also gien to the CBI 9fficers.

    During !ross-examination, he stated that he has

    not seen an of the accused practicing the surger as 3ell as the

    modern sstem of allopath.

    (8>>9) PW- Dr. S.S.Sang$an, 9i!e Chan!e**or, ;ni+ersity o%

    ea*th S!ien!es, Rohtak stated that he 3as (irector, !=I /S,

    7ohta" in the ear &$$'. He further stated that the notification

    appointing (irector, !=I/S, 7ohta" as a appropriate authorit

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    96/199

    )8

    for the (istricts 7ohta", Bhi3ani, Sonepat, Jhajjar, Narnaul,

    7e3ari, =urgaon and aridaad 3as made on &

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    97/199

    )%

    /aharashtra and thereafter, he 3as posted as !rincipal since

    &$11. He has seen letter sent the CBI to the earlier !rincipal

    namel (r. Sudha (eshpande and the earlier !rincipal had

    issued leaing certificate of accused Santosh son of 7amesh3ar

    7ao. He has rought the original register and the photo cop of

    the same is ;:.!%8*1.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that the

    aoe-said record 3as neer issued in his presence.

    (8>>9==) PW- Dr.9.K./ansa*, Aitiona* Pro%essor o% Surgery,

    A==3S, 'e$ De*hi, stated that he is posted as Additional

    !rofessor of Surger, AII/S, Ne3 (elhi. (irector, AII/S had

    constituted a committee, in 3hich he, (r. Sanjee 0al3ani and

    (r. (.Bho3mic" 3ere memers. He further stated that this

    committee 3as constituted in order to assist the CBI in

    inestigation of the case relating to the case of accused Amit

    2umar regarding "idne transplantation. He further stated that

    the had isited the hospital of accused Amit 2umar at House

    No.@+%@, Sector &+, !alam >ihar, =urgaon and (

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    98/199

    )'

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that 3ith

    regard to surger, there is a difference et3een practical

    "no3ledge and oo"ish "no3ledge. He further stated that

    during their interie3, no practical demonstration 3as done. He

    did not hae an "no3ledge as to 3hether accused Amit 3as in

    custod or not at the time of his isit. He, ho3eer, denied the

    suggestions.

    (8>>9===) PW-0 Dr. K.S.Rao stated that on &%.1.&$$', 3hen he 3as

    posted as (istrict amil elfare 9fficer in the office of Ciil

    Surgeon, =urgaon. He 3as made a memer of a team under the

    !C and !B(? Act constituted appropriate authorit-cum-

    Ciil Surgeon, =urgaon for inspecting ultrasound clinics and

    other unregistered places. (r.=ulshan 2umar Arora, (r. Satpal

    Bhanot and /r. 7.2.(ahia, (istrict (rug Inspector 3ere the

    other memers of the team. ?he team inspected house No.@+%@,

    Sector-&+, =urgaon, 3hich 3as erall pointed Ciil

    Surgeon, =urgaon on &%.$1.&$$'. He further stated that this

    house, as told the team, 3as o3ned accused Amit. 9n search

    of the uilding, the team found an ultrasound machine of

    ?oshia compan 3hich 3as not registered 3ith the appropriate

    authorit, =urgaon. Similarl, the place 3here this machine 3as

    placed 3as also not registered 3ith the appropriate authorit

    under !C and !N(? Act. ?he machine 3as seied and sealed

    in the presence of the team, including t3o independent

    3itnesses and a Head Constale /r. /ohta. He further stated

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    99/199

    ))

    that this machine 3as ta"en in possession after otaining

    permission from the court of learned ACJ/, =urgaon on

    &'.1.&$$'. He further stated that on the ground floor, there 3as

    a reception and adjacent to reception, there 3as an office of

    accused Amit. 9n the first floor, there 3ere t3o operation

    theaters euipped 3ith all the instruments, e.g. 9? lights, ole

    apparatus, defirillator, suc"tion machine, o:gen clinder and

    clinders of Nitro:ide 3hich are used for giing anesthesia to

    the patients for operation. He further stated that ultrasound

    machine is used for inestigation of the patients efore and

    after operation and for other purposes also, ut, it can onl e

    "ept after proper registration 3ith the Appropriate Authorit

    under !C and !N(? Act, 3hich 3as not in this case. 9n

    &).1.&$$', inentor of all the medicines, instruments and

    logistics 3ere prepared for the help of the police, 3ho

    ultimatel seied and sealed all the instruments and logistics.

    He further stated that house No.@+%@, Sector &+, =urgaon and

    house No.(- at the main gate and in inner parts. He proed

    the letters ;:.!%'*1 and ;:.!%'*& and letters mar"

    !%'*A to !%'*; 3hich ear his initials. He also identified

    his signature on spot memo ;:.!18*& 4alread e:hiited5.

    During !ross-examination, he stated that on seeing

    document ;:.!%'*&, he cannot state, 3ho had for3arded the

    same to (irector =eneral Health Serices, Harana, !anch"ula

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    100/199

    1$$

    or to the office of Ciil Surgeon. He further stated that letters

    ;:.!%'*1 and ;:.!%'*& 3ere receied him as an

    Authorit to inestigate the case inoling pre-conception and

    pre-natal (iagnostic ?echniue 4!CK!N(?5 Act. He, ho3eer,

    denied the suggestions.

    (8>>=>) PW- /a4u Ram stated that aout fie and half ears ac", in

    /eerut near Begumpur, there is a =anga !laa and near to that,

    there is a Nursing Home, 3here a o in the name of A"sha

    used to 3or". He 3as acuainted 3ith one Shahid and Shahid

    3as acuainted 3ith A"sha. He had donated his lood to

    Shahid on &-+ occasions. He had deeloped pain in the stomach

    and he had informed aout this to Shahid, 3ho had told him

    that he 3ill ta"e him to (r. A"sha for treatment. After t3o

    das, Shahid too" him to (r. A"sha. 9utside the Nursing

    Home, (r. A"sha told him that he 3ill get him treated from a

    doctor of (elhi, 3ho is "no3n to him, free of costs. (r. A"sha

    told him to come after

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    101/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    102/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    103/199

    1$+

    storied. ?here 3as a staircase from outside. After climing the

    staircase, he sa3 four persons 3ho 3ere doctors. 9ne of those

    persons is present in the court toda. ?he 3itness pointed out

    to3ards (r. Amit and started that he 3as one of those persons.

    (r. Amit inuired him 3hether he had ta"en the meals. ?o this,

    he stated that he had ta"en the meals. ?hereafter, (r. Amit

    as"ed him to accompan a Nepali o to room No.&$@. ?he

    Nepali o as"ed him to ta"e off his clothes and as"ed him to

    3ear a green coloured go3n. He 3as as"ed to lie on the ench

    3here alread a patient 3as ling. An injection 3as

    administered to him. He ecame unconscious. After t3o hours,

    he regained consciousness. He 3as finding it difficult to

    reathe. He 3as gien o:gen. He 3as shifted to another

    room. He cannot identif the man, 3ho had administered the

    injection to him as he 3as 3earing a mas". Ne:t morning,

    3hen he 3o"e up, he found that the right side of his stomach

    3as andage. He 3as haing acute pain. hen he cried, a

    Nurse named Sushma came there and she administered an

    injection to him. He again ecame unconscious. A o came

    there, 3ho told him that he and 7ajinder 3ith 3hom he is

    acuainted, 3ere there for the last @-< das. He also informed

    him that their "idnes hae also een remoed. ?he o also

    told him that the 3ill leae the hospital after &-+ das. After

    &-+ das, he 3as shifted to another Nursing Home, 3hich 3as

    in asement. He remained in that asement for 11 das.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    104/199

    1$@

    Sushma Nurse used to loo"-after him and a o used to loo"-

    after him there. ?he o used to proide meals there. 9ne da,

    he came out from the asement. Ho3eer, he 3as oerpo3ered

    the securit guard, 3ho too" him to the doctor in the

    hospital, 3ho also told him not to leae the hospital. His

    andages 3ere remoed and fresh andages 3ere applied. ?he

    doctor aout 3hom he had mentioned aoe is not one of the

    accused present in the court. 4?he 3itness pointed out to3ards

    /s. 0inda and identified her5. She 3as also present at =urgaon

    hospital 3here his "idne 3as remoed. He also found (r.

    Amit, (r. 2.2. Aggar3al and (r. pender at =urgaon hospital

    4?he 3itness pointed to3ards three accused and identified

    them5. He has seen the photographs of petrol pump opposite

    3hich the hospital, 3here his "idne 3as remoed, 3as located.

    ?he photographs is mar" !&*A. ?he photographs of hospital

    3here his "idne 3as remoed is mar" !1*H 4alread

    mar"ed5. ?he photographs of the machines are mar" !&*B,

    !&*C and !&*(. He has seen the photographs mar"

    !&*; and !&*, 3hich depicts the roof of the hospital.

    Sushma Nurse told him, 3hen he 3as in the asement then his

    "idne had een remoed and has transplanted to a rich person

    on pament of mone. He had neer consented to donate or sell

    his "idne. He 3as not a3are of the fact that his "idne 3ould

    e remoed. CBI 9fficers during inestigation of this case, had

    recorded his statement.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    105/199

    1$>>) PW-0 Dr. =.C.9erma, Senior Consu*tant stated that he is

    3or"ing in the department of =enitic /edicines, Siri =anga

    7am Hospital, Ne3 (elhi since 1))%. 9n the as"ing of the CBI

    office (elhi, he had gien the information regarding H0A test

    on the samples receied from (r. B.!.John, @+%@, Sector &+,

    !alam >ihar 7oad, =urgaon, Harana. He had gien the reports

    ;:.!'$*1 to ;:.!'$*1', the letters mar" !'$*A to '$*

    and '$*AA to '$*A/ e:cept mar" '$*A1 along3ith consent

    form 3hich 3ere receied from (r. B.!.John, @+%@, Sector-&+,

    !alam >ihar 7oad, =urgaon, Harana for H0A test. He had

    gien the letter ;:.!'$*1) to CBI along3ith list of patients

    referred (r. B.!.John in the ear &$$8 and &$$%. He also

    handed oer the reports of the Star /a: and =agan /edical

    Centre ide memo ;:.!'$*&$ and the reports are

    ;:.!'$*&1 to ;:.!'$*&+, 3hich ear his initials.

    During !ross-examination, he stated that there is

    no legal ar in conducting the H0A test of his person at an

    od reuest. ?he said test is a alid test and is eing

    uniforml performed in all oer India 3ithout an legal arrier.

    He has not seen an accused present in the court earlier. He has

    neer seen them 3or"ing 3ith (r. B.!.John.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    106/199

    1$8

    (8>>>=) PW-01 Ram 'i$as, Assistant ome-1 /ran!h, aryana

    Ci+i* Se!retariat, Chanigarh stated that he had 3or"ed under

    Shri Sant 2umar, Special Secretar to =ot. of Harana and is

    conersant 3ith his signatures. He further stated that he has

    rought the original consent letter ;:.!'1*1 dated +1.$1.&$$'

    issued under the signature of Special Secretar to =ot. of

    Harana. He has also 3or"ed under /s. iroa /ehrotra, the

    then inancial Commissioner K !rincipal Secretar to =ot. of

    Harana, Home (epartment. He is conersant 3ith her

    signature as he had done 3or" under her.

    During !ross-examination, he stated that he did

    not "no3 in 3hat capacit and po3er the had signed the said

    documents mentioned as ;.!'1*1 and ;:.!'1*&. He

    further stated that no letter 3as 3ritten their department to

    CBI 3ith regard to ?9H9 proisions. He further stated that

    neither an recommendation regarding inestigation 3as made

    their department to CBI*!olice. He has no personal

    "no3ledge 3ith regard to the present case.

    (8>>>==) PW-02 Dr. Raesh 5ain, Registrar, ;P3C, 8u!kno$(;P)

    stated that he had rought the reuisitioned record. As per

    record, (r. pender 2umar (ulesh had passed /BBS from

    007/, /edical College, /eerut in 1)%'. (r. pender 2umar

    (ulesh is registered in the Council on 1 stAugust, 1)%) ide

    registration No. &+

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    107/199

    1$%

    certificate and true cop of the same is ;:.!'&*&. He has sent

    the aoe record to CBI ide letter ;:.!'&*+.

    (8>>>===) PW-0" Ana*a $i%e o% Sho4it stated that she is residing in

    /eerut at !( Colon. She has four rothers and t3o sisters.

    Her ounger sister is 3or"ing as a Nurse at (ehradoon. She is

    )thstandard passed. After her schooling, she remained in their

    0adies Hospital. ?here 3as a primar school in that hospital.

    She 3as there to loo" after the small children 4orphan5, 3ho

    3ere residing there. She did 3or" in 2anan ?aagi Clinic.

    Some other staff 3as also there including the Nurse. Nun sister

    adised her to 3or" at Bhagat Hospital, (elhi. She 3or"ed

    there also. ?here, she 3as getting 7s.&@$$*- to 7s.&

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    108/199

    1$'

    allo3ed to cross e:amine this 3itness. (uring cross

    e:amination, the contents of statement ;:.!'+*A 3ere put to

    her 3ord 3ord ut she refused to o3n the contents of the

    statement and stated that he neer made such statement to the

    CBI. She 3as also confronted 3ith portion A to A, B to B and

    C to C of her statement ;:.!'+*A, ut she denied haing

    made such statement to the CBI.

    (8>>>=9) PW-0& Dr. A*ka /ashin stated that the letter ;:.!'@*1 3as

    handed oer to the CBI their Chief Administrator (r.

    (ilpreet Brar, in 3hich certified cop of medical records 3as

    gien to the CBI. She further stated that the !hotostat attested

    copies of patient record of /s.;leni (agiasi are ;:.!'@*& to

    ;:.!'@*+1, 3hich hae een certified (r. (ilpreet Brar

    and she has 3or"ed under her and she is conersant 3ith her

    signature. She further stated that the attested cop of emergenc

    record of Jo /athai 3as signed (r. (ilpreet Brar and she

    identified the signature of (r. Brar 3hich is ;:.!'@*+& and

    ;:.!'@*++.

    During !ross-examination, she stated that the

    record 3hich has een sho3n to her in the court that record has

    onl een counter-signed (r. Brar eing the Administrator of

    the Hospital. She further stated that in these treatment record,

    she had no3here personall treated the patient mentioned there.

    She further stated that document ;:.!'@*% 3as onl referral

    note on the asis of 3hich patient 3as rought to their hospital.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    109/199

    1$)

    She further stated that the name of patient mentioned therein

    3as treated her. She further admitted that the document

    ;:.!'@*% sho3s that the treatment of the patient 3as got

    conducted in the presence of the police officials at /A

    Hospital,=urgaon.

    (8>>>9) PW-0 Dr. .R.3.?ri7athi stated that he is 3or"ing as

    !rincipal at S9H /edical College K Hospital, Chhatarpur,

    /adha !radesh. He has rought the attested copies of the

    summoned record. He further stated that as per record, Jeean

    7.7aut 3as the student of the college from 1)'8 to 1))1.

    Jeean did diploma in Homopathic and /edicine and Surger

    4(H/S5. ?he attested cop of certificate and other records are

    ;:.!'

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    110/199

    11$

    document. He proed the documents 3hich are ;:.!'8*1

    tripartite agreement ;:.!'8*&, receipts of pament mar"

    !'8*A, !'8*B, !'8*, !'8*H to !'8*J, letter is

    ;:.!'8*+, pament plan mar" !'8*C, !'8*( and

    !'8*;, photocop of cheue mar" !'8*= and other

    documents mar" !'8*2 to !'8*S.

    During !ross-examination, he stated that he has

    no personal "no3ledge 3ith regard to this case. He is onl

    3itness to the record. He further stated that the propert

    mentioned in these documents 3ere purchased after ta"ing loan

    from Standard Charted Ban" as per record.

    (8>>>9==) PW-0 C.8.8asker, Registrar, Raasthan 3ei!a* Coun!i*,

    5ai7ur, stated that in the ear &$$', he 3as 3or"ing as Acting

    7egistrar,7ajasthan /edical Council, Jaipur. ?he Inestigating

    officer of CBI had ta"en the record from him pertaining to

    accused 2rishan 2umar Aggar3al. He handed oer the attested

    photocopies of the original record, 3hich are ;:.!'%*1 to

    ;:.!'%*1+ ide letter ;:.!'%*1@.

    (8>>>9===)PW-00 R.K.Sah, Assistant Pro%essor, Shri Ram Co**ege o%

    Commer!e, De*hi ;ni+ersity, stated that he remained posted

    as Assistant 7egistrar of Companies, (elhi and Harana in the

    ear &$$'. He had handed oer the attested copies of the

    original documents ide letter ;:.!81*1 4alread e:hiited5.

    ?he documents are ;:.!81*& to ;:.!81*+'. He further

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    111/199

    111

    stated that these documents hae een attested him and ear

    his signature.

    During !ross-examination, he stated that he

    cannot tell regarding the "ind of 3or" eing done at 0iert

    Health Care !riate 0imited at /ali Nagar, (elhi. He is

    deposing as per record onl.

    (8>>>=>) PW-0 Rohit Singh stated that he joined ABN amro Ban",

    Ne3 (elhi in April, &$$< as /anager. He has seen the folder

    containing account opening form of Account No.'%1@11

    pertaining to 0iert Health Care !t. 0td. 3ith registered

    office B-1*

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    112/199

    11&

    remittances certificate aisal Said Binagr"sa. He has seen

    the account opening forms along3ith documents of account

    No.'%C) PW- Chanan Singh stated that he joined this compan in

    the ear &$$@ as Serice ;ngineer. At that time, the name of the

    compan 3as /*S Baar (iagnostics India, 0imited. He 3as in

    their Health Care (iision. He further stated that this compan

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    113/199

    11+

    3as dealing in distriution of Bio-Chemistr euipments and

    7eagents. He further stated that all the euipments distriuted

    this compan in India relates to lood testing to reeal

    different tpe of disease. ?heir compan entered into an

    agreement 3ith Star /a: 0ife Care, =urgaon and photo cop of

    the agreement is mar" !)$*A. He further stated that these

    tests are also used for ascertaining in proper functioning of all

    od organs including the "idne, lier, heart, lungs etc.

    During !ross-examination, he stated that the

    document 3hich sho3n to him i.e. mar" !)$*A does not ear

    signature of an person either from their compan or on ehalf

    of customer name. He further stated that he neer isited the

    customer office in his life.

    (>C=) PW-1 Par+een 3ang*a stated that he 3as 3or"ing as /edical

    Store Assistant in Shri 7am Hospital, Balagarh in 1))). (r.

    Archana and (r. pender 3ere the !roprietors of the hospital

    and small operations 3ere eing conducted in this hospital. He

    further stated that the file containing production-cum-seiure

    memo dated 1@.&.&$$', letter dated 1@.&.&$$' of (r.

    /.C.>aida Hon. Consultant H0A 0a, Batra Hospital and

    /edical Centre of Ch.Aishi 7am Batra Basic Charitale ?rust,

    Ne3 (elhi and 1$+ H0A reuisition forms hae een seen

    him in the court. He further stated that H0A forms !

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    114/199

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    115/199

    11C==) PW-2 Smt. 6m$ati $i%e o% ari Chan stated that she

    3or"ed in Shri 7am Hospital as Nurse and she had signed the

    account opening form ;:.!)&*1. She further stated that (r.

    pender 3as the o3ner of the hospital and he had ta"en her si:

    photographs at that time. She 3as told that these photographs

    are reuired for medical insurance. She further stated that the

    accounts of other staff of the hospital 3ere also opened and

    from them also si: photographs each 3ere ta"en. She further

    stated that her photographs on H0A form is ;:.!))*&. She

    further stated that she did not fill in an form for lood testing

    as filled in the form. She further stated that H0A form is haing

    the name of Noorano.

    During !ross-examination, she admitted

    that her photo 3as not pasted on the form ut it 3as stapled.

    She further admitted that her photo not haing her signature.

    She also admitted that the photograph on account opening form

    and photograph on account are of different colour. She stated

    that si: photographs 3ere deeloped of same sie and colour.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    116/199

    118

    She further stated that her photograph on ;:.!)&*1 3as ta"en

    earlier. She, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.

    (>C===) PW-" Dr. Ashok Kumar 9ermastated that he is 3or"ing as

    Anaesthetist at 2ailash =roup of Hospital, Nodia since 1))8.

    He receied telephone of (r. pender in the ear &$$@. He

    as"ed him to 3or" in his hospital as Anaesthetist as he is to

    perform the operation of "idne transplantation. He told him

    that in Harana and /an other States, operation of "idne

    transplantation is legall alid and he told him that all the

    formalities hae een completed. He met (r. pender 3ho

    introduced him to (r. Amit 2umar in !alam >ihar, =urgaon.

    He told him that (r. Amit 2umar is Specialist in "idne

    transplantation. ?herefore, he agreed. He had gien anaesthesia

    to %-' patients and in these cases, the operations 3ere

    performed (r. Amit 2umar of donor and recipient. He

    further stated that all the operations 3ere performed in his

    presence. He further stated that (r. pender told him that the

    are shifting the enue to (0, =urgaon. He 3as called (r.

    pender and some time (r. Amit on moile phone 3heneer

    his serices 3ere reuired. He 3or"ed there onl for &-+

    months. He 3as gien total aout 7s.1.< lacs. He identified (r.

    pender and (r. Amit, 3ho are present in the court. He also

    identified accused /anoj, 3ho is present in the court.

    During !ross-examination, he admitted that

    efore giing anaesthesia patient is to e chec"ed thoroughl

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    117/199

    11%

    including his od condition, od 3eight mass inde: and other

    reports efore deciding the dose of the medicine to e gien at

    the time of anaesthesia. He further admitted that in routine at

    2ailash Hospital, he prepared post operatie and intra operatie

    notes on the patient ed tic"et. He, ho3eer, denied the

    suggestions.

    (>C=9) PW-& 3ano 5ain stated that he is doing the 3or" of cloth

    usiness at 7ohta". His father late Shri J.2.Jain 3as also doing

    the same usiness. He 3as suffering from "idne prolem.

    ?he hae een ta"ing treatment for "idne dialsis at Saroj

    Hospital, (elhi. ?he receied telephone of accused /anoj,

    3ho told them that in case the 3ant to get the "idne for his

    father transplanted, then the should contact him. Accused

    /anoj met his father outside Saroj Hospital. He further stated

    that he told his father that he 3ill get the "idne transplanted

    and total e:penditure 3ill e 7s.1$-1& lacs. After &-+ das,

    accused /anoj again contacted his father and as"ed to ring

    7s.

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    118/199

    11'

    "idne transplantation is legall alid in =urgaon. ?hereafter,

    his father 3as shifted to =urgaon, !alam >ihar for "idne

    transplantation and he told that the operation 3ill e performed

    in the night. His father 3as ta"en in the operation theater in the

    night. He also reached there and operation had started. ?he

    operation 3as oer after aout 1-1*& hours. /anoj and Amit

    told them that the operation is successful and his father 3as

    admitted in a room. ?he donor 3as arranged the accused,

    ut he did not "no3 the identit of the donor. He met his father

    in the IC on the ne:t da and his condition 3as normal. He

    further stated that his father staed in the hospital for aout +-@

    das. He further stated that the medicines 3ere also gien

    the same hospital. ?here 3ere seeral patients in the hospital.

    He further stated that on &@.1.&$$', accused /anoj told them to

    leae the hospital as the police is ehind them and /anoj too"

    his parents in a /aruti car and left them near the /aruti

    actor and from there, his maternal uncle too" them to Sir

    =anga 7am Hospital. ?he refused to gie the treatment.

    ?hereafter, his maternal uncle too" his parents to 7ohta".

    During !ross-examination, he stated that no

    phone numer of /anoj 3as proided them to the CBI

    officials, neither the had gien an call details of the numers

    3hich 3ere eing used him or his father to the CBI. He

    further stated that his father had e:pired in the ear &$$'. He

    further stated that his father had died natural death and 3as

  • 8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement

    119/199

    11)

    under treatment at !ushpa3ati Singhania Institute, NC?, (elhi.

    He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions


Recommended