Date post: | 03-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | sampath-bulusu |
View: | 222 times |
Download: | 1 times |
of 199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
1/199
1
In the Court of Shri Najar Singh, Addl. Sessions Judge-cum- Special Judge, CBI,
Harana !anch"ula.
CBI Case No# $% of &$$'.
(ate of Institution# 1&.$).&$$'*+1.$1.&$1&.
(ate of (ecision# &&.$+.&$1+.
CBI Versus 1. (r. pender (ulesh son of late !armanand resident of
House no.1'$), Sanja Colon, Ballahgarh, aridaad,
Harana permanent resident of /ohalla /unna 0al Near
Shi /andir, 2asa /a3ana, /eerut 4!5.
&. Amit 2umar 6 Santosh 7amesh3ar 7aut son of
7amesh3ar 7aut resident of -18', 9ma: ;:ecutie
loors, Sushant 0o"-III, Sector illage !aturnandurar, (istrict A"ola,
/aharashtra.
+. Jeean 2umar 7aut son of 7amesh3ar 7aut resident of
;C-II, C-1$&, ;ssel ?o3er, =urgaon, permanent resident
of >illage !aturnadurar, (istrict A"ola, /ahrashtra.
@. (r. 2rishan 2umar Aggar3al son of Nemi Chand Jain,
resident of House No.%&, Suhash Nagar, N;B ?hana,Shiaji !ar", (istrict Al3ar, permanent resident of ?ijara,
!S ?ijara (istrict Al3ar 47ajasthan5.
ihar, (elhi.
8. /s. 0inda (*9 ?utachin resident of Nurses Hostel,
7oom No.@
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
2/199
&
1$. /ohd. Shahid son of 0ate Adul /aid, resident of B-
&@II*Ne3 (elhi.
!resent# Shri 7.!. >erma, !ulic !rosecutor for the CBI.
Accused Jagdish and Jeean on ail 3ith Shri Ahishe" Sharma
Adocate and Shri /.S.7athi, 0egal Aid Counsel.
Accused Amit 2umar 6 Santosh 7.7aut, pender 2umar (ulesh,/anoj 2umar, 2rishan 2umar Aggar3al, =asudin, /ohd. Shahid in
custod represented Shri Amit (udeja Adocate, Shri /.S.7athi,
0egal Aid Counsel, Shri ?arun =upta Adocate, Shri Shi Charan
Chaudhar, Shri Ahishe" Sharma, Adocate.
Accused 0inda and Saraj 2umar 2oind on ail 3ith Shri Ahishe"
Sharma Adocate.
J(=/;N?#
Central Bureau of Inestigation 4hereinafter to e referred as Ethe
CBIF5 had filed the composite challan*complaint under Section && of
?ransplantation of Human 9rgans Act, 1))@ against accused (r. pender 2umar
(ulesh 4A-15G Amit 2umar alias Santosh 7amesh3ar 7aut 4A-&5, Jeean 2umar
7aut 4A-+5G (r. 2rishan 2umar Aggar3al4A-@5, /anoj 2umar 4A-
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
3/199
+
&. Succinctl, dilating upon the facts leading to the prosecution of the
accused culminating into trial of the instant case are that on &@ thJanuar, &$$', the
/oradaad police raided the unauthoried and clandestine hospital of Amit 2umar
located at @+%@, Sector &+, !alam >ihar, =urgaon in connection 3ith the
inestigation of I7 No.@' dated &@.$1.&$$' of !S Ciil 0ines, /oradaad, !.
(uring the raid, three ictims 3hose "idnes 3ere ta"en out operating them in
recent past and certain others 3ere found ling there. ?he ictims 3ere in serious
condition and 3ere shifted to (istrict Hospital, =urgaon. 9n the 3ritten complaint
of 7aghuraj Singh, SI, !S !2ot3ali (istrict /oradaad 4!5, I7 No.&% dated
&ihar, =urgaon and inestigation 3as ta"en up. (uring inestigation, Sections
1&$-B, +&8,+@& and
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
4/199
@
remoed 3ere arranged accused (r. pender 2umar (ulesh4A-15, Jagdish 4A-
'5, =asudin 4A-)5, ashpal Sharma 4Since died5 4A-1$5 and /ohd. Shahid 4A-
115 and others through a 3ell estalished net3or" of touts. >ictims 3ere "ept
guarded in the premises speciall hired for the purpose Jagdish 4A-'5 and
ashpal Sharma 4Since died5 4A-1$5. In furtherance of the said conspirac, the
accused got the pre-operation e:aminations of the ictims done in different
laoratories. After assessing the suitailit for transplantation, one "idne each of
the poor ictims 3as remoed fraudulentl in the illegal hospital estalished at
=urgaon and transplanted to need recipients after charging huge amount of
mone. hen the ictims protested against the remoal of their "idnes, the 3ere
threatened 3ith dire conseuences and pressuried to "eep mum. Accused Amit
2umar 6 Santosh 7.7aut 4A-&5 3ithout haing reuired ualification laid do3n in
the ?ransplantation of Human 9rgans 7ules, 1))< and eing a uac", along3ith
his accomplices 3as carring out "idne transplant operations in the aforesaid
illegal hospital 3ithout haing e:perts of releant fields of medicine and necessar
life saing facilities, as prescried in the ?ransplantation of Human 9rgans 7ules,
1))< "no3ing full 3ell that this act ma caused death of the ictims and
recipients. 9n completion of inestigation, the CBI filed composite
challan*complaint against accused Amit 2umar and others 4A1 to A)5 for trial for
commission of offences punishale under Sections 1&$-B read 3ith Sections
+@&,+&8,@1%,@8
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
5/199
ipin Chaa, !@@ !.S.!anchpal, !@< 7andhir Singh, !-@8 7amesh 2apoor,
!@% 7ashmi, !-@' 7ainder Singh, !-@) Sha"il, !-i"ram 2alra, !-%@ (r. >.N.Sharma, !-%< (r.
S.S.Sang3an, !-%8 (r. 2ishore /oresh3ar !impal"ar, !-%% (r. >.2.Bansal,
!-%' (r. 2.S.7ao, !-%) Bau 7am, !-'$ (r. I.C.>erma, !-'1 7am Ni3as,
!-'& (r. 7ajesh Jain, !-'+ Anjala, !-'@ (r. Al"a Bashin, !-'< (r.
H.7./.?ripathi, !-'8 7ajesh Chauhan, !-'% C.0.0as"er, !-'' 7.2.Shah,
!-') 7ohit Singh, !-)$ Chandan Singh, !-)1 !areen /angla, !-)& 9m
>ati, !-)+ (r. Asho" 2umar, !-)@ /anoj Jain, !-)< !arth Sahu, !-)8
>inod 2umar, !-)% Amit 2umar, !-)' 2uldeep Singh, !-)) ash !al Singh,
!-1$$ (eender Singh 7athi, !-1$1 (eender Singh, !-1$& 7.0.ada,
!-1$+ 2rishna Sastr, !-1$@ 7.C.2arnata", !-1$< Aja 2umar Bassi, !-
1$8 2rishan ?uteja, !-1$% /ahesh C.>aida, !-1$' Balasuramon, !-1$)
Satinder Bist, !-11$ >inod 2ataria, !-111 7ajesh 0al, !-11& >ine /udgil,
!-11+ (aender Singh /aan, !-11@ 7ajinder Singh, !-11< !.2.=roer, !-
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
8/199
'
118 S.C.Chauhan, !-11% /.7.Atre, !-11' 2.0./oses, !-11) 7ajudeen,
!-1&$ /.2.(har, !-1&1 Arun 9eroi, !-1&& Shahid, !-1&+ 7aghuraj
Singh, !-1&@ Anil Singh, !-1&< Jitesh 2umar and !-1&8 7aji (3iedi.
8. It is 3orth-3hile to mention here that the accused Amit, pender,
/anoj 2umar and 2rishan 2umar Aggar3al admitted some documents and 3ere
e:hiited as ;:.!'8*1, (-1@&,(-&
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
9/199
)
'. Before coming to the rial contentions adanced 0d. Counsels for
the parties, it 3ould e adantageous to gie the rief s"etch of the eidence led
the CBI as 3ell as defence #-
4i5 PW-1 Dr. R.S.Dahiya stated that he 3as 3or"ing in !=I/S
7ohta" since 1)'+. He further stated that a letter 3as receied
in the (irector office in !=I/S, 7ohta", from Ciil Surgeon,
=urgaon. He further stated that on receipt of the letter regarding
"idne scam, the (irector, !=I/S, 7ohta" constituted a fie
memers committee, (r.7.2.2ar3asra, Head of Surger
(epartment. ?he committee 3as constituted to enuire aout
the "idne scam 3hich happened in =urgaon. He further stated
that he has seen the report gien the committee in 3hich all
the details of the isits and the conclusions hae een recorded.
?he report is ;:.!1*1 running into si: pages 3hich ears his
signature and signatures of the aoe-mentioned other memers
of the committee.
During Cross-examination,he stated that he had
not seen the documents 3hich hae een referred to in the
report ;:.!1*1 and he has seen onl the said report.
(ii) PW-2 Ashok Kumar arit stated that he is 3or"ing in
/edical Council of India as (eput Secretar from /arch,
&$$+ and still continuing the same post. He further stated that
the CBI had as"ed certain information from their office
regarding some record of the doctors 3hich 3as supplied
him to the CBI. He has rought the record 3ith him. He further
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
10/199
1$
stated that a A letter ;:.!&*1 dated &%.&.&$$' 3as
receied from Superintendent of !olice CBI*;9->II, Ne3
(elhi see"ing certain information aout eight doctors namel
(r. Santosh 7amesh3ar 7aut 6 Amit 2umar, (r. Jeean
2umar, (r. Saraj 2umar 2oind, (r. pender 2umar, (r.
2rishan 2umar Aggar3al, (r.N.2.Aggar3al, (r. Asho" 2umar
>erma and (r. B.!.John regarding their registration details
3ith /edical Council of India. He further stated that in repl to
the said letter, he sent repl ;:.!&*& 3hich ears his
signature on ehalf of /edical Council of India ide letter
dated $+.$+.&$$' enclosing there3ith the details regarding their
registration 3ith the /edical Council of India. He further stated
that he had proided further information ide letter ;:.!&*+
dated $@.$+.&$$' 3hich ears his signature. He further stated
that the information contained in repl ;:.!&*& and letter
;:.!&*+ 3as gien on the asis of record aailale 3ith the
/edical Council of India.
During !ross-examination,he admitted that in
letter ;:.!&*1, the fatherFs name, niersit and addresses of
the persons regarding 3hom the information had een sought
3ere not mentioned. He further stated that ide repl
;:.!&*&, the had sought details regarding the aoe-said
persons that is fatherFs name, niersit, addresses etc. He
further stated that he has sent Anne:ures I to I> ;:.!&*@ to
;:.!&*% along3ith letter ;:.!&*& dated $+.$+.&$$'. He
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
11/199
11
further stated that enclosure ;:.!&*' 3as sent 3ith letter
;:.!&*+ dated $@.$+.&$$'. He further admitted that
information gien the /edical Council of India in respect of
(r. Amit 2umar referred to in the letter ;:.!&*1 of
Superintendent of !olice, CBI*;9->II*Ne3 (elhi at serial
No.1 3as incomplete and inconclusie as full particulars
regarding the fatherFs name, niersit and addresses 3ere not
proided. He further stated that the CBI did not furnish the
details regarding fatherFs name, niersit, addresses etc. as
demanded their office through letter ;:.!&*& dated
$+.$+.&$$'. He further stated that as per Anne:ure ;:.!&*',
(ulish pendra 2umar son of !arma Nand (ulish 3as
registered at serial No.&+
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
12/199
1&
under3ent dialsis procedure in /A Hospital, !itampura. He
further stated that generall t3o dialsis procedures 3ere done
eer 3ee". hen he 3as returned after dialsis, one person
met her in the /A hospital, !ritampur and as"ed her as to
3hether she 3anted to get "idne transplantation done. She
further stated that her mother used to accompan her in the /a:
Hospital. She further stated that the gae her the drip and too"
her to the same da i.e. 1'th Januar, &$$8 and "idne
transplantation 3as done on that da. Accused (r. Amit 2umar
3as present in the operation theater. She further stated that at
the time of operation, she 3as unconscious under the
anesthesia. She further stated that the amount of 7s.8.$$ lacs
3as paid to3ards the e:penses her father. She further stated
that accused Amit 2umar told her that "idne plantation 3as
legal in Harana as there 3as no la3 applicale in Harana in
this regard. She further stated she can identif accused Amit
2umar, pender and /s. 0inda, 3ho are present in the court.
She further stated that she remained in contact 3ith accused
Amit 2umar een after "idne transplantation for medicines
and injections.
During !ross-examination, she stated that she has
not rought her medical record sho3ing that she 3as suffering
from Nephrotic Sndrome. She further stated that the 3itness
has procured the photostat copies of the record 3hich 3ere
ordered to e "ept on the file. She did not rememer no3 in
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
13/199
1+
3hich ear she 3as in I th class. She further stated that she
had sumitted the record including receipts regarding her
dialsis procedure done t3ice a 3ee" in /A Hospital. She
further stated that she is IIth passed. She, ho3eer, denied the
suggestions.
4i5 PW-& 'eera Kumar #arg stated that he has three children,
t3o daughters 7ama =arg, Chhai =arg and one son /ohit
=arg. His 3ife Anjali =arg is a house-3ife. hen 7ama =arg
3as in Ith class, she had s3elling on her legs and the doctors
diagnosed the prolem as Nephrotic Sndrome. He further
stated that in the ear &$$ihar, =urgaon if she 3anted to undergo "idne
transplantation. ?hat person gae one moile phone numer
and he tal"ed to accused (r. Amit 2umar. Accused (r. Amit
2umar as"ed him to ring the patient and reports. ?he 3ent to
!alam >ihar, =urgaon ut he did not rememer the numer of
the uilding. ?he met accused (r. Amit 2umar and sho3ed
him the reports. (r. Amit 2umar adised for "idne
transplantation and he demanded amount of 7s.'.$$ lacs ut he
refused, on 3hich the amount 3as settled at 7s.8.$$ lacs. He
further stated that after matching of samples on 18th Januar,
&$$8, he receied a telephone call from accused Amit 2umar,
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
14/199
1@
3ho adised aout the medicines to e ta"en and as"ed them to
come on 1'th Januar, &$$8. 9n 1'th Januar, &$$8, in the
morning, he, his 3ife and his daughter 7ama =arg 3ent to
!alam >ihar, =urgaon. ?here 7ama =arg 3as ta"en to the first
floor and the remained sitting in the asement. His daughter
7ama =arg remained admitted for aout eleen-t3ele das.
9n 1'thJanuar, &$$8, 7ama =arg 3as gien a drip and ta"en
to the operation theatre and operation 3as done on that er
da. Accused Amit 2umar 3as to perform the operation ut
the 3ere not allo3ed to go into the operation theatre and
therefore, he cannot sa 3ho actuall performed the operation.
He paid the amount of 7s.8.$$ lacs to accused (r. Amit 2umar
at his residence efore the operation. ?he "ne3 (r. Amit
2umar, (r. pender 2umar and he cannot sa 3ho else
assisted accused Amit 2umar in the operation. He further stated
that after "idne transplantation, the remained in contact 3ith
accused Amit 2umar regarding the medicines to e ta"en
7ama =arg. He has seen accused Amit 2umar and pender
2umar, 3ho are present in the court.
During !ross-examination, he stated that the
alleged transaction of pament of 7s.8.$$ lacs to accused Amit
2umar him did not ta"e place in the presence of accused
pender 2umar. He had seen on teleision the reports
regarding arrest of accused persons in the alleged "idne scam.
He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
15/199
1II-Ne3 (elhi ut no such reference is
there in letter ;:.!1@*+. He denied the suggestion that false
report hae een sumitted them as per the directions of the
CBI officers as per their suitailit in the case. He, ho3eer,
denied the suggestion
4:5 PW-1 5oginer Singh stated that he is 3or"ing as ront
9ffice (ata ;ntr 9perator in ocus Imaging K 7esearch
Centre C-1$ =reen !ar" ;:tension, Ne3 (elhi and (r. !rashant
Sarin is its (irector. He further stated that patients under
prescriptions from Shri 7am Hospital used to come for tests.
?he prescription 3ere of (r. pender 2umar. He further stated
that in their centre, /7I, C.?.Scan, ltra-sound, -ra, ;cho-
cardiograph 3ere conducted. ?he patients used to ma"e
pament for the tests.
4:i5 PW-1 Rakesh Dahiya, Drugs Contro* 6%%i!er, Pani7at
stated that he is notified Inspector under Section &1 of (rugs K
Cosmetics Act. In the ear &$$', he 3as posted as (istrict
(rugs Inspector at =urgaon. 9n dated &%.$1.&$$', Ciil
Surgeon (r. S.S.(alal called him in his office and gae a
3ritten order ;:.!18*1 3hich 3as signed (r. S.S.(alal to
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
27/199
&%
(r. 2.S.7ao, (r. =ulshan Arora, (r. Satpal Bhanot and him to
chec" the premises related to (r. Amit 2umar i.e. @+%@, Sector-
&+, =urgaon regarding illegall "ept ultra-sound machine. ?he
team also prepared a spot memo regarding the sealing of the
aoesaid ultra-sound machine ;:.!18*&, 3hich ears his
signature along3ith all the team memers. He stated that he
prepared a list of 1% tpes of drugs on form-18 ;:.!18*+,
3hich also ears his signature as 3ell as signature of other
memers namel Shri 7.2.Singla, (r. =ulshan Arora and
pulic 3itnesses Shri Sandeep and !unit. 9n &'.$1.&$$', he
produced aoesaid seied drugs in the court of Chief Judicial
/agistrate, =urgaon for their custod orders ide application
;:.!18*@ and custod order is ;:.!18*
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
28/199
&'
3ithout in the "no3ledge of Health authorities. He further
stated that all the circumstances and material recoered
reealed that there 3as a proision of transplantation of human
"idnes.
During !ross-examination,he stated that as
per ;:.!18*1, there 3as no specific orders regarding search,
inspection and seiure of house No.@+%@, Sector &+, =urgaon.
He further stated that no call detail 3as demanded the CBI
regarding conersation et3een him and Ciil Surgeon. No
paper 3or" 3as done 3ith the police official 3ho 3as present
efore entering into the uilding. He denied the suggestion that
he neer isited the spot nor recoered anthing from the
uildings. He denied the suggestion that the uilding in
uestion used for hospital 3as a residential uilding. He denied
the suggestion that all the documents 3ere prepared the CBI
in the office and got his signatures there. He denied the
suggestion that he is deposing falsel at the ehest of the CBI.
4:ii5 PW-1 Suriner Pa* Singh stated that he is 3or"ing as A=/
4Commercial5 3ith the Airtel. He had purchased flat No.&$@,
Second loor, >alle >ie3 ;state, =urgaon aridaad road,
=urgaon for 7s.&&.< lacs from Ansals in the ear &$$8. He had
rented out this flat through Anil Bajpai to ash !al Sharma
4Since died5 in 9ctoer, &$$8 at the rent of 7s.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
29/199
&)
!al Sharma and /r. Bajpai. ?he rent deed 3as for 11 months
and it 3as rene3ed on &1.$).&$$% for another 11 months on
same terms and conditions. He has seen the original rent deed
;:.!1%*1 dated &1.).&$$%, 3hich ears his signature as 3ell
as that of ash !al Sharma and Anil Bajpai. 9n @.&.&$$', he
had got a call from /r. =ogan, Securit 9fficer of the Societ
informing him that four laourers 3ere residing in his flat, 3ho
had undergone "idne transplant operation and the 3ere
demanding the fare. He tried to contact ash !al Sharma.
Ho3eer, he could not e contacted. He contacted /r.Bajpai to
isit the flat, 3ho after isiting the flat informed him the four
laourers present at the flat 3ere demanding fare. 9n %.&.&$$',
police officials isited his house at Chandigarh. He further
stated that on '.&.&$$', he made the statement efore the
police. In /arch, &$$', CBI officers had recorded his
statement. He had produced mar" !1%*A and ;:.!1%*1
efore CBI 9fficers.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that stamp
papers of ;:.!1%*1 are dated1'.).&$$8. He denied the
suggestion that the lease deed is forged and faricated and has
een prepared at the instance of the CBI. He also denied the
suggestion that he had not rented out the flat to .!.Sharma. He
further stated that he had isited CBI office and he had not
handed oer an document regarding his o3nership to CBI. He
has also not rought an such document on that da.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
30/199
+$
4:iii5 PW-10 8u!ky #arg stated that she is !hd. in histor. She 3as
married 3ith 7aji =arg on 1%.@.&$$@. She is haing a fie
ears old son. She 3as suffering from high lood-pressure and
due to high lood-pressure, oth of her "idnes 3ere damaged.
She has to ta"e regular dialsis from /eerut. ?he doctor
adised her to get "idne transplant as her condition 3as
ecoming 3orse. She could not get "idne from her relaties.
She had no parental relaties. No one told her regarding
transplantation of "idne from an3here against pament.
(uring her isit to hospital at /eerut, other parents told her that
there 3as a doctor in =urgaon, 3ho transplant the "idne. ?he
person gae a moile numer to her husand. As such that
time, her condition 3as getting deteriorated, then her husand
contacted 3ith the doctor at =urgaon for transplantation of
"idne. ?hereafter, the 3ent (elhi and thereafter, her husand
contacted the person. She ecame unconscious and thereafter
3hat happened, she cannot tell. No doctor met her and her
husand at (elhi and aridaad. Her husand rought her for
dialsis to (elhi. It 3as not in her "no3ledge that she has een
ta"en for "idne transplantation. hen she regained
consciousness, she found herself in Shri =anga 7am Hospital,
(elhi. 9n the reuest of learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness
3as also declared hostile and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as
allo3ed to cross e:amine this 3itness. (uring cross
e:amination, contents of statement ;:.!1'*A 3ere put to her
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
31/199
+1
3ord 3ord ut she refused to o3n the contents of the
statement and stated that she neer made such statement to the
police. She 3as also confronted 3ith portions A to A, B to B, C
to C and ( to ( of her statement ;:.!1'*A, ut she denied
haing made such statement to the police. (espite length cross
e:amination, learned !ulic !rosecutor has failed to e:tract
anthing incriminating against the accused from the mouth of
this 3itness. She, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.
4:i:5 PW-1 Rai+ #arg stated that he did /Sc in /ath and he 3as
married 3ith 0uc" =arg on 1%.$@.&$$@. He also corroorated
the stand of !-1' 0uc" =arg his 3ife and toed the line of
!-1' 0uc" =arg.
During !ross-examination, he stated that the
condition of his 3ife 3as not improed at the time of recording
her statement also. He admitted that 3hateer scried the
CBI or the police officials, he signed the same. ?he contents of
the statement 3ere not read oer and e:plained to him. (uring
cross-e:amination !! for the CBI, he admitted that the CBI
officials did not isit in Shri =anga 7am Hospital. He 3as full
conscious 3hen he signed the statement ;:.!1'*A. He
further stated that the statement 3as not read oer to him. He
did not ma"e an complaint to an authorit regarding his
signatures otained on the statement 3ithout disclosing the
contents. He further admitted that all the contents recorded in
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
32/199
+&
the statement regarding treatment 3ere told him to the
police.
4::5 PW-2 'a+ee7 Singh stated that his father 3as suffering
from "idne prolem since the ear &$$8 and he 3as on
dialsis for the last t3o ears. ?he had tried for transplantation
of his "idne of Shri =anga 7am Hospital, Ne3 (elhi ut since
there 3as a hereditar prolem, so transplantation 3as not
possile. He further stated there 3as one "no3n (entist, 3ho
adised them that there is one doctor namel (r. Amit, 3ho
could do "idne transplantation legall after arranging donor
himself and this "idne transplantation 3as alid in Harana.
He too" him to (0, =urgaon in the house of accused (r. Amit
2umar. (r. Amit after going through the medical papers of his
father assured that their jo 3ill e done. He demanded a sum
of 7s.1
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
33/199
++
in the IC. He too" his father to 7oc"land Hospital and
admitted him there. After 1
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
34/199
+@
Ne3 (elhi for treatment. He further stated that he had also used
to go (r. 7am /anohar Hospital, (elhi for follo3 up treatment.
After follo3 up treatment, no prolem persisted and he used to
ta"e medicines. He 3as adised for "idne transplantation. His
rother-in-la3 accused Saraj 2umar 2oind 3as 3or"ing as
(octor in (r. 7am /anohar 0ohia Hospital. He further stated
no one told him that there 3as some doctor, 3ho transplants
"idnes. He had no telephone numer of an person, 3ho
adised him for "idne transplantation. 9n the reuest of
learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also declared hostile
and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to cross e:amine
this 3itness. (uring cross e:amination, contents of statement
;:.!&1*A 3ere put to him 3ord 3ord ut he refused to
o3n the contents of the statement and stated that he neer made
such statement to the police. He 3as also confronted 3ith
portions A to A, B to B, C to C, ( to (, ; to ; and to of his
statement ;:.!&1*A, ut he denied haing made such
statement to the police. (espite length cross e:amination,
learned !ulic !rosecutor has failed to e:tract anthing
incriminating against the accused from the mouth of this
3itness. He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.
4::ii5 PW-22 Dr. 3amta Ko+in stated that she passed /BBS from
2anpur niersit in the ear 1))'. She is doing priate
practice. She 3as married to accused Saraj 2umar in the ear
1))). He also passed /BBS from 2anpur niersit. He
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
35/199
+ihar to conduct the /07 of Sha"eel, Nasim
and Salim 2han. She e:amined all the three. 9n
e:amination of Sha"eel, she found that she had incision on
left lumer region, dressed, 1$ stitches in numer. Injuries
3ere 3ithin four das, "ept under oseration, adised ultra-
sound and -ra on 3hole adomen including "idne, ureter
and ladder 42B5 and he adised surgeonFs opinion. She
further stated that patient had alleged histor of
nephrectom on &+.1.&$$' 4surgical remoal of "idne5 at
un"no3n place. She had issued /07 ;:.!&
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
41/199
@1
signature of Sha"eel on ;:.!&
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
42/199
@&
him and she confirmed nephrectom i.e. remoal of one
"idne of each patient.
During !ross-examination, she admitted that in
all the /0Cs, she had not mentioned the dimension of the
incision mar" as she 3as not carring an scale. She
admitted that she cannot tell the dimension of the incision
mar" osered her on the patientFs od. She, ho3eer,
denied the suggestions.
4::i5 PW-2 Sa*im stated that he is illiterate. He had een
summoned in a case pertaining to "idne. He 3as
unconscious and did not "no3 3hat happened 3ith him.
hen he regained consciousness, he found that his adomen
had een andaged. He did not ma"e an inuir from an
one aout the andage. hen he had regained
consciousness, he found himself in the =ot. hospital. He
did not "no3 the place 3here that =ot. Hospital 3as
situated. He 3as discharged from the hospital after @-< das
inspite of the fact that he 3as not 3ell. It too" him more
than si: months to recoer slightl. He did not "no3 from
3here he 3as oarded us after discharge from the hospital
as his mother had ta"en him. His mother had come to "no3
aout the incident from ?C. He cannot tell the time ta"en in
the journe from the hospital to his home as he 3as not in
proper condition. He cannot sa 3hether it had ta"en one
hour or ten hours in journe. He had a scuffle at Bagpath
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
43/199
@+
Bus Stand in /eerut and he along3ith seeral others 3ere
pic"ed up the police and thereafter, he found himself in
the hospital. He did not "no3 3hether his "idne 3as
remoed or not. He 3as not interrogated in this regard eer.
His statement 3as not recorded the CBI at an point of
time. He had made a statement efore a Judge at =urgaon as
he 3as ta"en the police officials in the court and 3as
threatened to ma"e a statement as per their directions and
3ill. His that statement 3as not oluntar. 9n the reuest of
learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also declared
hostile and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to cross
e:amine this 3itness. (uring cross e:amination, contents of
statement ;:.!&8*1 3ere put to him 3ord 3ord ut he
refused to o3n the contents of the statement and stated that
he neer made such statement to the police. He 3as also
confronted 3ith portion A to A1, B to B1, C to C1, ( to (1,
; to ;1, = to =1, H to H1, I to I1, J to J1 of his statement
;:.!&8*1, ut he denied haing made such statement to
the police. (espite length cross e:amination, learned
!ulic !rosecutor has failed to e:tract anthing
incriminating against the accused from the mouth of this
3itness. He has seen his statement ;:.!&8*& recorded
the /agistrate on +1.$1.&$$' at =urgaon. He admitted that
the /agistrate had recorded his statement correctl as stated
him. He identified his photos 3hich 3ere ta"en in the
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
44/199
@@
=ot. hospital and the same are ;:.!&8*+ to ;:.!&8*8.
He admitted that all the four photographs 3ere depicting the
stitch mar"s and andages on his adomen. He admitted that
he is not feeling 3ell. He further admitted that he ma e not
feeling 3ell due to remoal of his "idne. He further stated
that he had neer isited or remained admitted in an
hospital or an "othi in =urgaon. He, ho3eer, denied the
suggestions.
4::ii5 PW-2 Da*i7 stated that originall he elong to illage
Badli ?andla district 7ampur, 4!5. He had changed his
name after a pulication in the ne3spaper. Aout @-< ears
ac", 3hen he 3as sleeping at 2oria Bridge near ISB?, &-+
policemen along3ith +-@ other officials in the plain clothes
3ere pic"ing up some persons, 3ho 3ere sleeping and gae
them danda lo3s. ?he had pic"ed up @-< persons. ?he
had chec"ed the adomens of seeral persons and
3hosoeer 3as haing some mar" of surger on adomen
3as ta"en them and rest 3ere let off. He 3as also ta"en
along them as he 3as also haing surger mar"s on his
adomen. He 3as haing the prolem of stone in his "idne
as he 3as in the hait of ta"ing liuor freuentl and he had
undergone an operation for remoal of the stone 1
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
45/199
@ to >1, to 1, to
1 and to 1 of his statement ;:.!&'*@, ut he denied
haing made such statement to the police. (espite length
cross e:amination, learned !ulic !rosecutor has failed to
e:tract anthing incriminating against the accused from the
mouth of this 3itness. He has also seen his statement mar"
!&'*A 3hich is ;:.!&'*A1. He 3as also confronted
3ith portion A to A1, B to B1, C to C1, ( to (1, ; to ;1, =
to =1, H to H1, I to I1,J to J1 of his statement mar"
!&'*A, ut he denied haing made such statement to the
police. (espite length cross e:amination, learned !ulic
!rosecutor has failed to e:tract anthing incriminating
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
48/199
@'
against the accused from the mouth of this 3itness. He,
ho3eer, denied the suggestions.
4::i:5 PW-2 Sanay /harga+ stated that he is 3or"ing as
Chartered Accountant at (elhi. He got himself chec"-up in
(elhi and he 3as told that oth of his "idnes are not
3or"ing properl. He also got treatment ut he 3as adised
that either there 3ill dialsis or transplantation of "idne is
the onl solution. ?here 3as no proper donor in his famil.
hen he 3ent for dialsis, one /r. =arg met him, 3ho gae
the reference of accused (r. Amit. /r. =arg too" him to
=urgaon. He told him that his daughter had got
transplantation from accused (r. Amit. He met (r. Amit. He
told him that the transplantation of "idne 3as possile in
Harana. He agreed to his proposal. He called him on &)th
June, &$$%. He did not meet him et3een the interening
period. He did not rememer 3hether his signatures 3ere
otained the doctor on an paper or not. He further stated
that no lood sample 3as ta"en from him for an test. (ue
to injection, he ecame unconscious. He further stated that
after operation, he 3as ta"en to IC. He did not rememer
eing he 3as semi conscious. He remained three das in the
IC. ?hereafter, he 3as discharged from the hospital. He
identified onl (r. Amit. ?hereafter, he 3as discharged from
the hospital. He 3as prescried medicines after his
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
49/199
@)
operation. He paid 7s.1& lacs in cash on the da of his
operation.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that
accused Amit 3as sho3n to him in the CBI office first time
and identified him in the court. He, ho3eer, denied the
suggestions.
4:::5 PW-" 3ayank 3ahesh$ari stated that he is a cloth
merchant. His elder sister 7uchi Bala /ahesh3ari 3as
suffering from "idne failure. She regular had pain on her
ac" after delier. ?he dialsis of his sister remained
continued in Apollo Hospital. He identified accused /anoj
and Amit. He got discharged his sister on his ris" and she
3as shifted him in 7am /urti Hospital at Barell. At
Barell also, doctor adised to remoe the transplanted
"idne. hen he 3as in Barell, he receied a telephone call
from CBI officer. He identified onl (r. Amit and /anoj.
?hereafter, his sister e:pired.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that
statement 3hich 3as sho3n to him the CBI officials outside
the court efore ma"ing statement efore the court the same
does not ear signature of him as 3ell as signature of CBI
official 3ho had 3ritten this statement. He, ho3eer, denied the
suggestions.
4:::i5PW-"1 9ikas Aggar$a* stated that his mother-in-la3
/adhuli"a =upta 3as suffering from "idne failure. She had
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
50/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
51/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
52/199
ihar, =urgaon.
He has seen the ed head tic"et No.Cr-1&1@ of Naseem, the
same is ;:.!++*1. His opinion in the file is ;:.!++*& dated
&
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
53/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
54/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
55/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
56/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
57/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
58/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
59/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
60/199
8$
No.@+%@ is ;:.!+'*8. ?he true cop of the said seiure memo
is ;:.!+'*%. He further stated that as per the record of the
H(A, Ameet 2umar is the o3ner of the house No.@+%@,
Sector-&+, =urgaon.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that 3hen
permission to mortgage 3as sought from the office of H(A, it
is onl for the purpose of otaining loan from the an". He
admitted that there is no complaint regarding an commercial
actiities in the said house No.@+%@, Sector &+, =urgaon efore
&).1.&$$' and
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
61/199
81
405 PW-& Amu*ya Prasa stated that the plot 3as originall
allotted to Shri (hirender Singh (utta ide their allotment letter
dated &1.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
62/199
8&
7s.&$ lacs 3as paid ide (( No.1%%%&8 dated 1ihar, !hase-I, (elhi. He further
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
63/199
8+
stated that this compan used to proide serice of entilators
multi-parameter monitors, sringe pump etc. In Januar, he had
gone to lat No.@+%@, !alam >ihar, =urgaon on the directions
of the compan for repairing of entilator model Sero +$$,
ho3eer, he could not repair the said entilator as it 3as
eond his capailit.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that a jo
card is prepared for an serice or complaint made in the
compan. He further admitted that in that jo card, signatures of
the customer is also otained as 3ell as the person to 3hom the
said complaint has een for3arded for compliance put his
signature.
40III5PW-&" 9i7in Cha4a stated that he is partner of /*S A>/
Surgicare Inc. 1
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
64/199
8@
along3ith summar of inoices ;:.!@+*) to Inspector, CBI,
Ne3 (elhi, 3ho seied the same ide seiure memo
;:.!@+*1$, 3hich ears his signature. He further stated that
he still hae to receie alance pament of 7s.1,&),8&'*- from
0iert Health Care as the cheue mar" !@+*A could not e
encashed as the account of /*S 0iert Health Care had een
seied in connection 3ith a criminal case.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that prior
to &$$', there 3as no transaction 3ith Jeean 2umar. He
admitted that no document 3as signed as 3ell as stamped
their office or him prior to handing oer the same to the CBI.
He further admitted that the originals of these inoices are in
his custod and the same has not een rought him. He
further admitted that no plot numers hae een mentioned in
the inoices. He admitted that the inoices in uestion are
computer generated documents. He admitted that the retail
inoices ;:.!@+*1 to ;:.!@+*) does not ear receiing of
an part. He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.
40I>5 PW-&& P.S.Pan!h7a*, 3otor 8i!en!ing 6%%i!er, West
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
65/199
85 PW-& Ranhir singh stated that he is one of the (irectors of
/*S ?7I?9N /edical Serices !t. 0td. %*&$& 4IInd loor5,
Ne3 (elhi. He further stated that this compan 3as estalished
in the ear 1))$ and deals in sale and serices of medical
euipments mainl dialsis euipment and accessories of
arious rands. He further stated that the had sold the said
machine to man hospitals including 0iert Health Care ''%@,
Sector &+, !alam >ihar =urgaon. He further stated that the sale
inoices are ;:.!@
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
67/199
8%
approached him for the purpose of purchase of euipments of
dialsis normall. He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.
40>I5 PW-& Ramesh Ka7oor stated that he is one of the partners of
/*S 9/A ;ngineering or"s,
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
68/199
8'
;:.!@8*%, one 9*? light moile 3as sold to /*S 0iert
Health Care plot No.@%)+, Sector &+, =urgaon. He identified
his signatures on ;:.!@8*& to ;:.!@8*% as the same hae
een issued him. He further stated that the paments 3ere
made accused Amit cash as 3ell as cheue. He rightl
identified accused Amit.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that in
that statement, all the orders regarding 3hich all the inoices,
3hich hae een sho3n to him in the court, orders for such
purchase of goods 3ere made onl through telephone. He
admitted that all the orders 3ere placed through telephone. He
further admitted that as per retail inoices sho3n to him in the
court, pament 3as supposed to e receied from the part
either through cheue*an" draft or account paee cheue onl
as mentioned in retail inoices. He further admitted that this
condition does not find mention in these retail inoices.
40>II5 PW-& Rashmi aughter o% Shri Ra+iner Singh stated that
he has done /.!hil in ;nglish. He 3as suffering from S0; due
to 3hich his "idne 3as damaged. He 3as ta"ing treatment in
AII/S, Ne3 (elhi from (r. Aggar3al, Nephrologist. (r.
Aggar3al adised him that ultimate treatment is "idne
transplantation and it is etter that the same e done
immediatel efore dialsis. He further stated that (r. !ardeep
2umar 3as loo"ing after his dialsis. (uring that period, he
had reduced his 3eight from @$ "gs. to &8 2gs. and 3as under
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
69/199
8)
depression. His father too" him for "idne transplantation
some3here in (elhi. He cannot identif the doctor, 3ho
conducted his "idne transplantation. He did not meet an
doctor, 3ho conducted his "idne transplantation. In IC, some
nurses 3ere present ut he could not identif anone. 9n the
reuest of learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also
declared hostile and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to
cross e:amine this 3itness. (uring cross e:amination, the
contents of statement mar" !@%*A 3ere put to her 3ord
3ord ut she refused to o3n the contents of the statement and
stated that she neer made such statement to the CBI. She 3as
also confronted 3ith portion A to A, B to B, C to C, ( to ( and
; to ; of his statement mar" !@%*A, ut she denied haing
made such statement to the CBI.
(>89===) PW-&0 Ra+iner Singh ?omar state that his daughter
7ashmi ?omar 3as suffering from "idne prolem. She 3as on
dialsis in Jas3ant 7ai Hospital due to her deteriorate
condition. 9ne ard o in Jas3ant 7ai Hospital told him that
one 7ajesh had got "idne transplanted from (elhi. He
contacted him in the hospital. He and his daughter accompanied
him in his car. He 3ent to /ehrauli, (elhi. He did not "no3
an doctor namel pender. 7ajesh told him that the total
e:penses for "idne transplantation is aout 7s.&,$$,$$$*-. 9n
the reuest of learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also
declared hostile and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
70/199
%$
cross e:amine this 3itness. (uring cross e:amination, the
contents of statement mar" !@'*A 3ere put to him 3ord
3ord ut he refused to o3n the contents of the statement and
stated that he neer made such statement to the CBI. He 3as
also confronted 3ith portion A to A of his statement mar"
!@'*A, ut he denied haing made such statement to the CBI.
(>8=>) PW-& Shaki* stated that he has seen his statement ;:.!1*1
recorded the /agistrate, 3hich ears his signature. He stated
that he 3as ta"en to Ciil Hospital for treatment at the Ciil
Hospital 3here !ress and !olice people 3ere present. His
photographs are mar" !@)*A to !@)*(. He identified his
3riting and signature, 3hich is ;:.!@)*& on ed head tic"et
mar" !@)*;. He further stated that on that da, he "ne3 that
his "idne 3as remoed (r. Amit as it has appeared on the
paper and on ?>. He had seen (r. Amit on the teleision for the
first time. He further stated that the man, 3ho administered him
injection is not present in the court. He did not see (r. Amit in
the hospital 3herein his "idne 3as remoed. 9n the reuest of
learned !ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also declared hostile
and learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to cross e:amine
this 3itness. (uring cross e:amination, the contents of
statement mar" !@)* 3ere put to him 3ord 3ord ut he
refused to o3n the contents of the statement and stated that he
neer made such statement to the CBI. He 3as also confronted
3ith portion A to A1 and B to B1of his statement mar" !@)*,
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
71/199
%1
ut he denied haing made such statement to the CBI. He,
ho3eer, denied the suggestions.
(8) PW- Smt. Surner Ka7oor stated that she did B.Sc and
diploma in /edical 0a ?echnolog. In the ear &$$%, she 3as
3or"ing as 0a ?echnician in Batra Hospital, Ne3 (elhi. ?his
la is specialied in tissue tping test and (r. /.C.>aida is the
Head of the 0a and this la is controlled Batra Hospital. (r.
/.C.>aida is the Honourar Consultant. He used to receie
lood samples of the recipients and donors along3ith the H0A
form. heneer, he used to receie the H0A form along3ith
samples, he used to get an endorsement signed from the person,
3ho rings the sample and get his signature in his presence.
H0A forms are ;:.!
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
72/199
%&
;:.!
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
73/199
%+
further stated that in H0A form ;:.!
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
74/199
%@
that his life choice is onl 1$ and he adised him to undergo
ne3 "idne transplantation. He told him that total e:penses for
the "idne transplantation 3ill e 7s.%.< lacs and (r. Amit told
him that he 3ill do eerthing. He told him that he do not hae
that much amount and to reduce the amount. ?hen, he agreed
for 7s.@.< lacs. He also agreed for that amount. Ne:t morning,
(r. Amit called for dialsis. He further stated that operation 3as
conducted in the second house 3here he 3as e:amined (r.
Amit. He did not "no3 the e:act name of the place or localit
3here he 3as operated. ?he operation too" aout three hours.
He 3as there in the hospital for aout @-< das under the
superision of (r. Amit. He further stated that he 3as
discharged after fie das from the hospital. (r. Amit did not
demand an mone from him. He met one more person, 3ho
had supposed to hae operated for "idne transplantation. He
cannot identif accused Amit in the court. He further stated that
he handed oer the preious treatment record of his "idne
transplantation to the CBI ide seiure memo ;:.!
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
75/199
%) Dr. 9anana 8a*, stated that she did /BBS and /( in
!atholog. She is the ;:ecutie (irector of 0al !ath 0a
haing office of ;s"a House, Ne3 (elhi. She further stated
that the are haing 1$$ las and oer &
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
82/199
'&
the letter ;:.!
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
83/199
'+
;:.!8$*1, 3ho 3ere referred to him and this letter ears
his signature. ?he detail is :x.PW2 to :x.PW&&
3hich ears his signature and initials. He further stated that
these tests are general tests and are not conducted specificall
for "idne transplantation ut can e roadl used to
determine pre-operatie status and fitness for surger of an
ailment.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that the
name of the doctors as mentioned in ;:.!8$*& to
;:.!8$*@@ haing different spellings of names ma e of
different persons.
(8>=) PW-1 Data Ram has stated that he is 3or"ing as Senior
?echnical Assistant in the office of 7egistrar of Compan
(elhi. He did not rememer aout the letter of CBI receied
in their office. Ho3eer, the same 3as handed oer their
official namel 7.2.Shah Assistant 7egistrar of Companies,
NC? of (elhi and Harana to the CBI. He had 3or"ed 3ith
Shri 7.2.Shah and is conersant 3ith his signature. ?he
documents are ;:.!81*1 to ;:.!81*+'. ?he detail and
information 3hich are reuired has een gien in ;:.!81*1
to ;:.!81*+'. He further stated that the certificate of
incorporation ;:.!81*& is of 0iert Health Care !t. 0td.
and ;:.!81*+ is memorandum of registration and
;:.!81*@ is article of registration of hospital and the
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
84/199
'@
remaining documents are relating to the reuirements of
incorporation.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that
their department neer erifies 3hether the firm is in
e:istence or not.
(8>==) PW-2 Dee7ak Puri has stated that their compan namel
N.2.Jain Instrument !t. 0td. haing trade mar" 0aomed
manufacture different "inds of microscope. He is 3or"ing as
Salesman in this compan. He further stated that aout fie
ears ac", t3o persons 3ho 3ere carring a isiting card in
the name of Jeean 2umar came to their factor for
purchasing microscope and the as"ed for purchasing a
/icroscope and the gae them catalogs of all the products
and the selected one Inerted /icroscope, the cost of 3hich
3as 7s.1,1%,&
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
85/199
'===) PW-" Dr. /.P.5ohny has stated that he is /BBS, (/7(
and /(. He 3as running a clinic at 2aparshera. He further
stated that in et3een the ear 1))=9) PW-& A4rar Khan stated that he is 3or"ing as (ialsis
technician since 1))' at /odi Hospital Sa"et, Ne3 (elhi. He
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
86/199
'8
further stated that in the ear &$$&, he had met Jeean in
general as friend. (r. Jeean told that he 3as running a hospital
for dialsis. He has also gien him his moile numer 3hich he
did not rememer. As a friend, he used to tal" to him on his
moile numer freuentl in general. 9nce or t3ice, the had
the reuirement of technician for dialsis, then the had
contacted him ut he is regular emploee of =/ /odi
Hospital, Ne3 (elhi. He had conducted ' to 1$ dialsis in the
ear &$$+, 3hen he 3as called accused Jeean at dialsis
Centre, Sector-&+, =urgaon. He further stated that there 3ere
t3o dialsis machines in the dialsis centre. ;erthing 3as
aailale 3hich 3as reuired for dialsis for a patient in the
dialsis centre. He did not "no3 3ho is the /anager of that
dialsis Centre. No lood sample 3as eer ta"en in his
presence. ?here used to e no doctor. 9n the reuest of learned
!ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also declared hostile and
learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to cross e:amine this
3itness. (uring cross e:amination !!, the contents of
statement ;:.!8@*A 3ere put to him 3ord 3ord ut he
refused to o3n the contents of the statement and stated that he
neer made such statement to the CBI. He 3as also confronted
3ith portion A to A, B to B, C to C, ( to ( and ; to ; of his
statement ;:.!8@*A, ut he denied haing made such
statement to the CBI.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
87/199
'%
(8>9)PW- /harat /hushan stated that he is 3or"ing as
Administratie officer in (r. 7am /anohar 0ohia Hospital,
Ne3 (elhi since 1st9ctoer, &$1$. He 3as neer associated in
the inestigation of the CBI in this case. He further stated that
the CBI had not ta"en in possession an record from him ut
the same 3as ta"en in possession from his predecessor Shri
Anil 2umar. He had 3or"ed 3ith Shri Anil 2umar, ;:. (eput
(irector Administration and he is conersant 3ith his signature.
He further stated that the memo regarding details of leae*dut
of /s. 0inda Chinneihoih Staff Nurse is ;:.!8
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
88/199
''
on %.1.&$$', 3hich 3as allo3ed upto &&.$1.&$$' as per record.
It 3as not in his "no3ledge as to 3hether father of /s. 0inda
had e:pired on %.1.&$$' and for that reason, she had applied
leae and for that reason, she had gone to her natie place at
/anipur 4;ast State5.
(8>9=)PW- Par+een Kumar 3itta* stated that he is 3or"ing as
Account Assistant at Sadha3na Hospital, Ballahgarh in the
ear &$$% for t3o months and 1% das. (r. Archana 3ife of (r.
pender 3as the proprietor of this hospital. (r. Archana
along3ith famil used to reside on the second floor of the said
hospital. He 3as doing the jo of deposit of electricit and
other ills etc. He used to receie the telephone of (r. pender
ut he did not "no3 3hether (r. pender had otained an
loan from an an" or not. He "ne3 !areen /angla, Jas3ant
Singh, (r. Archana as emploed in Sadha3na Hospital. (r.
pender had called in the cain of (r. Archana and he had
gien him lan" H0A forms and as"ed him to fill-up the name
and addresses of the patients. (r. pender had ta"en out a spiral
diar from 3hich he had dictated the names and addresses of
the recipients and donors. ?he H0A forms ;:.!
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
89/199
')
for ma"ing copies of the photographs and handed oer the same
to (r. pender. He identified (r. pender present in the court.
During !ross-examination, he stated that the CBI
officer did not otain his signature and hand-3riting for
comparison. He did not rememer all the 3or"s did 3ith
Sadha3na Hospital. He is 3or"ing 3ith the !ropert (ealer.
!rior to this jo, he had furnished his io-data 3ith regard to his
serice record and histor to his preious emploer. He had no
3here disclosed in his iodata furnished for getting the jo that
he 3as eer emploed 3ith Sadha3na Hospital or (r.
pender. He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.
(8>9==)PW- Suni* Kumar has stated that he did BSc and diploma
in (/0? and is 3or"ing as technician in AI/S, Ne3 (elhi
since 1))). He further stated that he had conducted the H0A
tests of &$ patients*donors. He further stated that he isited onl
&-+ times and used to go to the la on the as"ing of mesh. He
further stated that onl the reports mentioned in ;:.!8%*1 to
;:.!8%*&$ 3ere prepared him. He had not receied an
mone 3ith regard to this 3or" eing the raid 3as conducted
the police. He cannot identif an of the accused present in
the court.
During !ross-examination, he stated that there
might e numer of petrol pumps in Sector-&+ =urgaon ut he
can recognie onl one petrol pump, in case, he isited the spot.
He accompanied CBI officers t3ice in the uilding, 3here he
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
90/199
)$
had 3or"ed. He further stated that his specimen hand-
3riting*signature*thum-impressions 3ere otained the CBI
9fficers ut no record is aailale 3ith the CBI. He, ho3eer,
denied the suggestion.
(8>9===) PW-0 Dimngai!hing ?hangsing B Din 'gari!hing Simte
stated that she completed her three ears diploma in =eneral
Nursing and /id3ife from Assam in the ear &$$+. She further
stated that she 3or"ed as a Nurse at oodland Hospital,
Shillong for aout si: months. She further stated that thereafter,
she shifted to (elhi 3here she 3or"ed at Sood /edical Centre,
(elhi Cantonment Area for aout three ears. ?hereafter, she
3or"ed in ?hialand. She further stated that she neer 3or"ed in
Starma: Hospital, !alam >ihar, Sector-&+ =urgaon. She "ne3
accused 0inda present in the court as the are from the same
natie place i.e. /anipur. /s. 0inda is*3as 3or"ing at 7/0
Hospital, Ne3 (elhi as Staff Nurse. She did not "no3 after
7/0 hospital 3here she had 3or"ed. 9n the reuest of learned
!ulic !rosecutor, this 3itness 3as also declared hostile and
learned !ulic !rosecutor 3as allo3ed to cross e:amine this
3itness. (uring cross e:amination, the contents of statement
mar" !8'*A 3ere put to her 3ord 3ord ut she refused to
o3n the contents of the statement and stated that she neer
made such statement to the CBI. She 3as also confronted 3ith
portion A to A of her statement mar" !8'*A, ut she denied
haing made such statement to the CBI.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
91/199
)1
(8>=>) PW- Dr.P.R.Sharma, Se!retary Centra* Coun!i* o% =nian
3ei!ines, 'e$ De*hi stated that he is 3or"ing as 7egistrar-
cum-Secretar and their office maintained central register of
Indian /edicines. He further stated that the CBI 9fficer had
made an inuir from him regarding registration of accused
7aut Santosh 7amesh3ar and he had gien his information ide
letter ;:.!8)*1, 3hich ears his signature. He had also gien
the e:tract of the register cop of 3hich is ;:.!8)*& and the
name of accused 7aut Santosh 7amesh3ar figured at serial
No.%%'>) PW- Dr. Da*i7 ;ttam Rao Wange, Registrar,
3aharashtra Coun!i* o% =nian 3ei!ines, 3um4ai stated
that he is posted as 7egistrar /aharashtra Council of Indian
/edicines, /umai. He had gien the cop of the =aette
notification of /aharashtra ;:.!%$*1 running in t3o pages
and receipt ;:.!%$*&.
(8>>=) PW-1 Dr.S.S.Da*a* stated that he 3as posted as Ciil
Surgeon, =urgaon since +.@.&$$%. ?he notification ;:.!&+*1
4alread e:hiited5 3as also issued the Health (epartment,
=oernment of Harana. He also proed the notifications
;:.!&+*+ and ;:.!&+*@ 4alread e:hiited5. 9n the reuest
of =urgaon police, he along3ith (r. Ashrudeen /edical
Superintendent of =H, =urgaon, (r. S.!.Bhanot, (r. S.!.ada
of !ushpanjali Hospital, =urgaon isited the hospital of (r.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
92/199
)&
Amit in the night of &@ th Januar, &$$' and three operated
patients namel Naseem, Saleem and Sha"il 3ere found in the
hospital, 3hich 3ere shifted to =eneral Hospital, =urgaon
under the care of (r. S.!.Bhanot Surgeon for further
inestigation, the information of 3hich 3as sent to (=HS,
Harana ide letter ;:.!%1*1, 3hich ears his signature.
?hen on &%.$1.&$$', he constituted a team of doctors namel
(r. 2.S.7ao, the then amil elfare 9fficer. =urgaon, (r.
=ulshan Arora, Senior /edical 9fficer, =H, =urgaon, (r. Sat
!al Bhanot, =eneral Surgeon, =urgaon and Shri 7a"esh
(ahia, (istrict (rug Inspector, =urgaon to isit for the
inspection and search and seiure of the machine under the
!N(? K (rugs and Cosmetics Act. ?he letter is ;:.!%1*&,
3hich ears his signature.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that as per
notification dated &
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
93/199
)+
3or"ing as Surgeon in 7ohta" /edical College, since 1)''. He
further stated that the =oernment of Harana had notified
(irector, !=I, /S, 7ohta" as appropriate authorit for districts
7ohta", Bhi3ani, Sonepat, Jhajjar, 7e3ari, =urgaon and
aridaad ide notification dated &
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
94/199
)@
sealed 3hen produced efore this court. He, ho3eer, denied
the suggestions.
(8>>===) PW-" Dr. 9ikram Ka*ra stated that in the ear &$$', he 3as
3or"ing in 7oc"land Hospital, Ne3 (elhi since &$$
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
95/199
)>=9) PW-& Dr. 9.'.Sharma stated that he is Chairman,
Antiuac"r, I/A, HP (elhi. CBI had as"ed to furnish
information as to 3hether accused are competent prescried
and practice the surger as 3ell as the modern sstem of
allopath or not. He has gien the information in the form of
letter ;:.!%@*1, 3hich ears his signature and also the
signature of (r. (.7.7ai. He further stated that a judgment
deliered full court of HonFle Supreme Court in case of
/u"htiar Chand >s. State of !unja and others in the CA
No.') of 1)'% and also a gaette notification dated 8.@.&$$&
3ere also gien to the CBI 9fficers.
During !ross-examination, he stated that he has
not seen an of the accused practicing the surger as 3ell as the
modern sstem of allopath.
(8>>9) PW- Dr. S.S.Sang$an, 9i!e Chan!e**or, ;ni+ersity o%
ea*th S!ien!es, Rohtak stated that he 3as (irector, !=I /S,
7ohta" in the ear &$$'. He further stated that the notification
appointing (irector, !=I/S, 7ohta" as a appropriate authorit
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
96/199
)8
for the (istricts 7ohta", Bhi3ani, Sonepat, Jhajjar, Narnaul,
7e3ari, =urgaon and aridaad 3as made on &
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
97/199
)%
/aharashtra and thereafter, he 3as posted as !rincipal since
&$11. He has seen letter sent the CBI to the earlier !rincipal
namel (r. Sudha (eshpande and the earlier !rincipal had
issued leaing certificate of accused Santosh son of 7amesh3ar
7ao. He has rought the original register and the photo cop of
the same is ;:.!%8*1.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that the
aoe-said record 3as neer issued in his presence.
(8>>9==) PW- Dr.9.K./ansa*, Aitiona* Pro%essor o% Surgery,
A==3S, 'e$ De*hi, stated that he is posted as Additional
!rofessor of Surger, AII/S, Ne3 (elhi. (irector, AII/S had
constituted a committee, in 3hich he, (r. Sanjee 0al3ani and
(r. (.Bho3mic" 3ere memers. He further stated that this
committee 3as constituted in order to assist the CBI in
inestigation of the case relating to the case of accused Amit
2umar regarding "idne transplantation. He further stated that
the had isited the hospital of accused Amit 2umar at House
No.@+%@, Sector &+, !alam >ihar, =urgaon and (
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
98/199
)'
During !ross-examination, he admitted that 3ith
regard to surger, there is a difference et3een practical
"no3ledge and oo"ish "no3ledge. He further stated that
during their interie3, no practical demonstration 3as done. He
did not hae an "no3ledge as to 3hether accused Amit 3as in
custod or not at the time of his isit. He, ho3eer, denied the
suggestions.
(8>>9===) PW-0 Dr. K.S.Rao stated that on &%.1.&$$', 3hen he 3as
posted as (istrict amil elfare 9fficer in the office of Ciil
Surgeon, =urgaon. He 3as made a memer of a team under the
!C and !B(? Act constituted appropriate authorit-cum-
Ciil Surgeon, =urgaon for inspecting ultrasound clinics and
other unregistered places. (r.=ulshan 2umar Arora, (r. Satpal
Bhanot and /r. 7.2.(ahia, (istrict (rug Inspector 3ere the
other memers of the team. ?he team inspected house No.@+%@,
Sector-&+, =urgaon, 3hich 3as erall pointed Ciil
Surgeon, =urgaon on &%.$1.&$$'. He further stated that this
house, as told the team, 3as o3ned accused Amit. 9n search
of the uilding, the team found an ultrasound machine of
?oshia compan 3hich 3as not registered 3ith the appropriate
authorit, =urgaon. Similarl, the place 3here this machine 3as
placed 3as also not registered 3ith the appropriate authorit
under !C and !N(? Act. ?he machine 3as seied and sealed
in the presence of the team, including t3o independent
3itnesses and a Head Constale /r. /ohta. He further stated
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
99/199
))
that this machine 3as ta"en in possession after otaining
permission from the court of learned ACJ/, =urgaon on
&'.1.&$$'. He further stated that on the ground floor, there 3as
a reception and adjacent to reception, there 3as an office of
accused Amit. 9n the first floor, there 3ere t3o operation
theaters euipped 3ith all the instruments, e.g. 9? lights, ole
apparatus, defirillator, suc"tion machine, o:gen clinder and
clinders of Nitro:ide 3hich are used for giing anesthesia to
the patients for operation. He further stated that ultrasound
machine is used for inestigation of the patients efore and
after operation and for other purposes also, ut, it can onl e
"ept after proper registration 3ith the Appropriate Authorit
under !C and !N(? Act, 3hich 3as not in this case. 9n
&).1.&$$', inentor of all the medicines, instruments and
logistics 3ere prepared for the help of the police, 3ho
ultimatel seied and sealed all the instruments and logistics.
He further stated that house No.@+%@, Sector &+, =urgaon and
house No.(- at the main gate and in inner parts. He proed
the letters ;:.!%'*1 and ;:.!%'*& and letters mar"
!%'*A to !%'*; 3hich ear his initials. He also identified
his signature on spot memo ;:.!18*& 4alread e:hiited5.
During !ross-examination, he stated that on seeing
document ;:.!%'*&, he cannot state, 3ho had for3arded the
same to (irector =eneral Health Serices, Harana, !anch"ula
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
100/199
1$$
or to the office of Ciil Surgeon. He further stated that letters
;:.!%'*1 and ;:.!%'*& 3ere receied him as an
Authorit to inestigate the case inoling pre-conception and
pre-natal (iagnostic ?echniue 4!CK!N(?5 Act. He, ho3eer,
denied the suggestions.
(8>>=>) PW- /a4u Ram stated that aout fie and half ears ac", in
/eerut near Begumpur, there is a =anga !laa and near to that,
there is a Nursing Home, 3here a o in the name of A"sha
used to 3or". He 3as acuainted 3ith one Shahid and Shahid
3as acuainted 3ith A"sha. He had donated his lood to
Shahid on &-+ occasions. He had deeloped pain in the stomach
and he had informed aout this to Shahid, 3ho had told him
that he 3ill ta"e him to (r. A"sha for treatment. After t3o
das, Shahid too" him to (r. A"sha. 9utside the Nursing
Home, (r. A"sha told him that he 3ill get him treated from a
doctor of (elhi, 3ho is "no3n to him, free of costs. (r. A"sha
told him to come after
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
101/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
102/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
103/199
1$+
storied. ?here 3as a staircase from outside. After climing the
staircase, he sa3 four persons 3ho 3ere doctors. 9ne of those
persons is present in the court toda. ?he 3itness pointed out
to3ards (r. Amit and started that he 3as one of those persons.
(r. Amit inuired him 3hether he had ta"en the meals. ?o this,
he stated that he had ta"en the meals. ?hereafter, (r. Amit
as"ed him to accompan a Nepali o to room No.&$@. ?he
Nepali o as"ed him to ta"e off his clothes and as"ed him to
3ear a green coloured go3n. He 3as as"ed to lie on the ench
3here alread a patient 3as ling. An injection 3as
administered to him. He ecame unconscious. After t3o hours,
he regained consciousness. He 3as finding it difficult to
reathe. He 3as gien o:gen. He 3as shifted to another
room. He cannot identif the man, 3ho had administered the
injection to him as he 3as 3earing a mas". Ne:t morning,
3hen he 3o"e up, he found that the right side of his stomach
3as andage. He 3as haing acute pain. hen he cried, a
Nurse named Sushma came there and she administered an
injection to him. He again ecame unconscious. A o came
there, 3ho told him that he and 7ajinder 3ith 3hom he is
acuainted, 3ere there for the last @-< das. He also informed
him that their "idnes hae also een remoed. ?he o also
told him that the 3ill leae the hospital after &-+ das. After
&-+ das, he 3as shifted to another Nursing Home, 3hich 3as
in asement. He remained in that asement for 11 das.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
104/199
1$@
Sushma Nurse used to loo"-after him and a o used to loo"-
after him there. ?he o used to proide meals there. 9ne da,
he came out from the asement. Ho3eer, he 3as oerpo3ered
the securit guard, 3ho too" him to the doctor in the
hospital, 3ho also told him not to leae the hospital. His
andages 3ere remoed and fresh andages 3ere applied. ?he
doctor aout 3hom he had mentioned aoe is not one of the
accused present in the court. 4?he 3itness pointed out to3ards
/s. 0inda and identified her5. She 3as also present at =urgaon
hospital 3here his "idne 3as remoed. He also found (r.
Amit, (r. 2.2. Aggar3al and (r. pender at =urgaon hospital
4?he 3itness pointed to3ards three accused and identified
them5. He has seen the photographs of petrol pump opposite
3hich the hospital, 3here his "idne 3as remoed, 3as located.
?he photographs is mar" !&*A. ?he photographs of hospital
3here his "idne 3as remoed is mar" !1*H 4alread
mar"ed5. ?he photographs of the machines are mar" !&*B,
!&*C and !&*(. He has seen the photographs mar"
!&*; and !&*, 3hich depicts the roof of the hospital.
Sushma Nurse told him, 3hen he 3as in the asement then his
"idne had een remoed and has transplanted to a rich person
on pament of mone. He had neer consented to donate or sell
his "idne. He 3as not a3are of the fact that his "idne 3ould
e remoed. CBI 9fficers during inestigation of this case, had
recorded his statement.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
105/199
1$>>) PW-0 Dr. =.C.9erma, Senior Consu*tant stated that he is
3or"ing in the department of =enitic /edicines, Siri =anga
7am Hospital, Ne3 (elhi since 1))%. 9n the as"ing of the CBI
office (elhi, he had gien the information regarding H0A test
on the samples receied from (r. B.!.John, @+%@, Sector &+,
!alam >ihar 7oad, =urgaon, Harana. He had gien the reports
;:.!'$*1 to ;:.!'$*1', the letters mar" !'$*A to '$*
and '$*AA to '$*A/ e:cept mar" '$*A1 along3ith consent
form 3hich 3ere receied from (r. B.!.John, @+%@, Sector-&+,
!alam >ihar 7oad, =urgaon, Harana for H0A test. He had
gien the letter ;:.!'$*1) to CBI along3ith list of patients
referred (r. B.!.John in the ear &$$8 and &$$%. He also
handed oer the reports of the Star /a: and =agan /edical
Centre ide memo ;:.!'$*&$ and the reports are
;:.!'$*&1 to ;:.!'$*&+, 3hich ear his initials.
During !ross-examination, he stated that there is
no legal ar in conducting the H0A test of his person at an
od reuest. ?he said test is a alid test and is eing
uniforml performed in all oer India 3ithout an legal arrier.
He has not seen an accused present in the court earlier. He has
neer seen them 3or"ing 3ith (r. B.!.John.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
106/199
1$8
(8>>>=) PW-01 Ram 'i$as, Assistant ome-1 /ran!h, aryana
Ci+i* Se!retariat, Chanigarh stated that he had 3or"ed under
Shri Sant 2umar, Special Secretar to =ot. of Harana and is
conersant 3ith his signatures. He further stated that he has
rought the original consent letter ;:.!'1*1 dated +1.$1.&$$'
issued under the signature of Special Secretar to =ot. of
Harana. He has also 3or"ed under /s. iroa /ehrotra, the
then inancial Commissioner K !rincipal Secretar to =ot. of
Harana, Home (epartment. He is conersant 3ith her
signature as he had done 3or" under her.
During !ross-examination, he stated that he did
not "no3 in 3hat capacit and po3er the had signed the said
documents mentioned as ;.!'1*1 and ;:.!'1*&. He
further stated that no letter 3as 3ritten their department to
CBI 3ith regard to ?9H9 proisions. He further stated that
neither an recommendation regarding inestigation 3as made
their department to CBI*!olice. He has no personal
"no3ledge 3ith regard to the present case.
(8>>>==) PW-02 Dr. Raesh 5ain, Registrar, ;P3C, 8u!kno$(;P)
stated that he had rought the reuisitioned record. As per
record, (r. pender 2umar (ulesh had passed /BBS from
007/, /edical College, /eerut in 1)%'. (r. pender 2umar
(ulesh is registered in the Council on 1 stAugust, 1)%) ide
registration No. &+
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
107/199
1$%
certificate and true cop of the same is ;:.!'&*&. He has sent
the aoe record to CBI ide letter ;:.!'&*+.
(8>>>===) PW-0" Ana*a $i%e o% Sho4it stated that she is residing in
/eerut at !( Colon. She has four rothers and t3o sisters.
Her ounger sister is 3or"ing as a Nurse at (ehradoon. She is
)thstandard passed. After her schooling, she remained in their
0adies Hospital. ?here 3as a primar school in that hospital.
She 3as there to loo" after the small children 4orphan5, 3ho
3ere residing there. She did 3or" in 2anan ?aagi Clinic.
Some other staff 3as also there including the Nurse. Nun sister
adised her to 3or" at Bhagat Hospital, (elhi. She 3or"ed
there also. ?here, she 3as getting 7s.&@$$*- to 7s.&
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
108/199
1$'
allo3ed to cross e:amine this 3itness. (uring cross
e:amination, the contents of statement ;:.!'+*A 3ere put to
her 3ord 3ord ut she refused to o3n the contents of the
statement and stated that he neer made such statement to the
CBI. She 3as also confronted 3ith portion A to A, B to B and
C to C of her statement ;:.!'+*A, ut she denied haing
made such statement to the CBI.
(8>>>=9) PW-0& Dr. A*ka /ashin stated that the letter ;:.!'@*1 3as
handed oer to the CBI their Chief Administrator (r.
(ilpreet Brar, in 3hich certified cop of medical records 3as
gien to the CBI. She further stated that the !hotostat attested
copies of patient record of /s.;leni (agiasi are ;:.!'@*& to
;:.!'@*+1, 3hich hae een certified (r. (ilpreet Brar
and she has 3or"ed under her and she is conersant 3ith her
signature. She further stated that the attested cop of emergenc
record of Jo /athai 3as signed (r. (ilpreet Brar and she
identified the signature of (r. Brar 3hich is ;:.!'@*+& and
;:.!'@*++.
During !ross-examination, she stated that the
record 3hich has een sho3n to her in the court that record has
onl een counter-signed (r. Brar eing the Administrator of
the Hospital. She further stated that in these treatment record,
she had no3here personall treated the patient mentioned there.
She further stated that document ;:.!'@*% 3as onl referral
note on the asis of 3hich patient 3as rought to their hospital.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
109/199
1$)
She further stated that the name of patient mentioned therein
3as treated her. She further admitted that the document
;:.!'@*% sho3s that the treatment of the patient 3as got
conducted in the presence of the police officials at /A
Hospital,=urgaon.
(8>>>9) PW-0 Dr. .R.3.?ri7athi stated that he is 3or"ing as
!rincipal at S9H /edical College K Hospital, Chhatarpur,
/adha !radesh. He has rought the attested copies of the
summoned record. He further stated that as per record, Jeean
7.7aut 3as the student of the college from 1)'8 to 1))1.
Jeean did diploma in Homopathic and /edicine and Surger
4(H/S5. ?he attested cop of certificate and other records are
;:.!'
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
110/199
11$
document. He proed the documents 3hich are ;:.!'8*1
tripartite agreement ;:.!'8*&, receipts of pament mar"
!'8*A, !'8*B, !'8*, !'8*H to !'8*J, letter is
;:.!'8*+, pament plan mar" !'8*C, !'8*( and
!'8*;, photocop of cheue mar" !'8*= and other
documents mar" !'8*2 to !'8*S.
During !ross-examination, he stated that he has
no personal "no3ledge 3ith regard to this case. He is onl
3itness to the record. He further stated that the propert
mentioned in these documents 3ere purchased after ta"ing loan
from Standard Charted Ban" as per record.
(8>>>9==) PW-0 C.8.8asker, Registrar, Raasthan 3ei!a* Coun!i*,
5ai7ur, stated that in the ear &$$', he 3as 3or"ing as Acting
7egistrar,7ajasthan /edical Council, Jaipur. ?he Inestigating
officer of CBI had ta"en the record from him pertaining to
accused 2rishan 2umar Aggar3al. He handed oer the attested
photocopies of the original record, 3hich are ;:.!'%*1 to
;:.!'%*1+ ide letter ;:.!'%*1@.
(8>>>9===)PW-00 R.K.Sah, Assistant Pro%essor, Shri Ram Co**ege o%
Commer!e, De*hi ;ni+ersity, stated that he remained posted
as Assistant 7egistrar of Companies, (elhi and Harana in the
ear &$$'. He had handed oer the attested copies of the
original documents ide letter ;:.!81*1 4alread e:hiited5.
?he documents are ;:.!81*& to ;:.!81*+'. He further
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
111/199
111
stated that these documents hae een attested him and ear
his signature.
During !ross-examination, he stated that he
cannot tell regarding the "ind of 3or" eing done at 0iert
Health Care !riate 0imited at /ali Nagar, (elhi. He is
deposing as per record onl.
(8>>>=>) PW-0 Rohit Singh stated that he joined ABN amro Ban",
Ne3 (elhi in April, &$$< as /anager. He has seen the folder
containing account opening form of Account No.'%1@11
pertaining to 0iert Health Care !t. 0td. 3ith registered
office B-1*
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
112/199
11&
remittances certificate aisal Said Binagr"sa. He has seen
the account opening forms along3ith documents of account
No.'%C) PW- Chanan Singh stated that he joined this compan in
the ear &$$@ as Serice ;ngineer. At that time, the name of the
compan 3as /*S Baar (iagnostics India, 0imited. He 3as in
their Health Care (iision. He further stated that this compan
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
113/199
11+
3as dealing in distriution of Bio-Chemistr euipments and
7eagents. He further stated that all the euipments distriuted
this compan in India relates to lood testing to reeal
different tpe of disease. ?heir compan entered into an
agreement 3ith Star /a: 0ife Care, =urgaon and photo cop of
the agreement is mar" !)$*A. He further stated that these
tests are also used for ascertaining in proper functioning of all
od organs including the "idne, lier, heart, lungs etc.
During !ross-examination, he stated that the
document 3hich sho3n to him i.e. mar" !)$*A does not ear
signature of an person either from their compan or on ehalf
of customer name. He further stated that he neer isited the
customer office in his life.
(>C=) PW-1 Par+een 3ang*a stated that he 3as 3or"ing as /edical
Store Assistant in Shri 7am Hospital, Balagarh in 1))). (r.
Archana and (r. pender 3ere the !roprietors of the hospital
and small operations 3ere eing conducted in this hospital. He
further stated that the file containing production-cum-seiure
memo dated 1@.&.&$$', letter dated 1@.&.&$$' of (r.
/.C.>aida Hon. Consultant H0A 0a, Batra Hospital and
/edical Centre of Ch.Aishi 7am Batra Basic Charitale ?rust,
Ne3 (elhi and 1$+ H0A reuisition forms hae een seen
him in the court. He further stated that H0A forms !
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
114/199
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
115/199
11C==) PW-2 Smt. 6m$ati $i%e o% ari Chan stated that she
3or"ed in Shri 7am Hospital as Nurse and she had signed the
account opening form ;:.!)&*1. She further stated that (r.
pender 3as the o3ner of the hospital and he had ta"en her si:
photographs at that time. She 3as told that these photographs
are reuired for medical insurance. She further stated that the
accounts of other staff of the hospital 3ere also opened and
from them also si: photographs each 3ere ta"en. She further
stated that her photographs on H0A form is ;:.!))*&. She
further stated that she did not fill in an form for lood testing
as filled in the form. She further stated that H0A form is haing
the name of Noorano.
During !ross-examination, she admitted
that her photo 3as not pasted on the form ut it 3as stapled.
She further admitted that her photo not haing her signature.
She also admitted that the photograph on account opening form
and photograph on account are of different colour. She stated
that si: photographs 3ere deeloped of same sie and colour.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
116/199
118
She further stated that her photograph on ;:.!)&*1 3as ta"en
earlier. She, ho3eer, denied the suggestions.
(>C===) PW-" Dr. Ashok Kumar 9ermastated that he is 3or"ing as
Anaesthetist at 2ailash =roup of Hospital, Nodia since 1))8.
He receied telephone of (r. pender in the ear &$$@. He
as"ed him to 3or" in his hospital as Anaesthetist as he is to
perform the operation of "idne transplantation. He told him
that in Harana and /an other States, operation of "idne
transplantation is legall alid and he told him that all the
formalities hae een completed. He met (r. pender 3ho
introduced him to (r. Amit 2umar in !alam >ihar, =urgaon.
He told him that (r. Amit 2umar is Specialist in "idne
transplantation. ?herefore, he agreed. He had gien anaesthesia
to %-' patients and in these cases, the operations 3ere
performed (r. Amit 2umar of donor and recipient. He
further stated that all the operations 3ere performed in his
presence. He further stated that (r. pender told him that the
are shifting the enue to (0, =urgaon. He 3as called (r.
pender and some time (r. Amit on moile phone 3heneer
his serices 3ere reuired. He 3or"ed there onl for &-+
months. He 3as gien total aout 7s.1.< lacs. He identified (r.
pender and (r. Amit, 3ho are present in the court. He also
identified accused /anoj, 3ho is present in the court.
During !ross-examination, he admitted that
efore giing anaesthesia patient is to e chec"ed thoroughl
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
117/199
11%
including his od condition, od 3eight mass inde: and other
reports efore deciding the dose of the medicine to e gien at
the time of anaesthesia. He further admitted that in routine at
2ailash Hospital, he prepared post operatie and intra operatie
notes on the patient ed tic"et. He, ho3eer, denied the
suggestions.
(>C=9) PW-& 3ano 5ain stated that he is doing the 3or" of cloth
usiness at 7ohta". His father late Shri J.2.Jain 3as also doing
the same usiness. He 3as suffering from "idne prolem.
?he hae een ta"ing treatment for "idne dialsis at Saroj
Hospital, (elhi. ?he receied telephone of accused /anoj,
3ho told them that in case the 3ant to get the "idne for his
father transplanted, then the should contact him. Accused
/anoj met his father outside Saroj Hospital. He further stated
that he told his father that he 3ill get the "idne transplanted
and total e:penditure 3ill e 7s.1$-1& lacs. After &-+ das,
accused /anoj again contacted his father and as"ed to ring
7s.
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
118/199
11'
"idne transplantation is legall alid in =urgaon. ?hereafter,
his father 3as shifted to =urgaon, !alam >ihar for "idne
transplantation and he told that the operation 3ill e performed
in the night. His father 3as ta"en in the operation theater in the
night. He also reached there and operation had started. ?he
operation 3as oer after aout 1-1*& hours. /anoj and Amit
told them that the operation is successful and his father 3as
admitted in a room. ?he donor 3as arranged the accused,
ut he did not "no3 the identit of the donor. He met his father
in the IC on the ne:t da and his condition 3as normal. He
further stated that his father staed in the hospital for aout +-@
das. He further stated that the medicines 3ere also gien
the same hospital. ?here 3ere seeral patients in the hospital.
He further stated that on &@.1.&$$', accused /anoj told them to
leae the hospital as the police is ehind them and /anoj too"
his parents in a /aruti car and left them near the /aruti
actor and from there, his maternal uncle too" them to Sir
=anga 7am Hospital. ?he refused to gie the treatment.
?hereafter, his maternal uncle too" his parents to 7ohta".
During !ross-examination, he stated that no
phone numer of /anoj 3as proided them to the CBI
officials, neither the had gien an call details of the numers
3hich 3ere eing used him or his father to the CBI. He
further stated that his father had e:pired in the ear &$$'. He
further stated that his father had died natural death and 3as
8/12/2019 Gurgaon Kidney Scam Case Judgement
119/199
11)
under treatment at !ushpa3ati Singhania Institute, NC?, (elhi.
He, ho3eer, denied the suggestions