+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J....

Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J....

Date post: 19-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
22
Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W. Ohfuchi et al. And particularly to: Li Yuan (now at Chase-Manhattan Bank) John Koshyk (now at Toronto- Dominion bank) Yoshiyuki Takahashi (Hokkaido U.)
Transcript
Page 1: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.

Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models

Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid..

AFES folks: W. Ohfuchi et al.

And particularly to:Li Yuan (now at Chase-Manhattan Bank)

John Koshyk (now at Toronto-Dominion bank)Yoshiyuki Takahashi (Hokkaido U.)

Page 2: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.

"Ultra-fine" AGCM

GFDL SKYHI N270-L40 (~T450)

AFES T1279-L96 | T639-L48, T639-L24

NASA fvGCM N720-L48 NICAM 3.5 km Icosahedral-L54

Page 3: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.

"Ultra-fine" AGCM

GFDL SKYHI N270-L40 (~T450)

AFES T1279-L96 | T639-L48, T639-L24

NASA fvGCM N720-L48 NICAM 3.5 km Icosahedral-L54

Page 4: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 5: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.

SKYHI Model

Global, hydrostatic primitive equations A-grid-point model, explicit time-marching Model domain: surface-about 80 km Ri-dependent vertical mixing Smagorinsky-type harmonic horizontal mixing Moist convective adjustment

Page 6: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 7: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.

possible caveats

A-grid - poor representation of dispersion relation for short waves, no enstrophy conservation - accumulation of energy ...?

Interpolation needed for spherical harmonic expansions

Moist convective adjustment Smagorinsky diffusion

Page 8: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.

AFES Model

Global, hydrostatic primitive equations Spectral model, semi-implicit time differencing Model domain: surface to about 55 km Linear biharmonic diffusion Emanuel convection, Modified AS ... others

Page 9: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 10: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 11: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 12: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 13: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 14: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 15: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 16: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 17: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.

Dry-dynamical-core Model

No latent heat No thermal interaction with surface No topography Thermal forcing only through a Newtonian

cooling towards a specified radiative equilibrium which is a function of pressure and latitude (following Held & Suarez, 1994)

Page 18: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 19: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.

(Nontopographic) Gravity Wave Forcing

Can we characterize gravity wave fluxes into the stratosphere in terms of tropospheric circulations?

e.g. how much spatial and temporal variability is in the flux (e.g. "90% of flux from 1% of the globe?")

Page 20: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 21: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Page 22: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.

Topographic drag - comparing detailed simulation with parameterization

Review: Garner 2005 JAS Earlier simulations: e.g. Olaffson and

Bougeault 1996, 1997

Relation of near tropopause gravity wave fluxes to underlying dry dynamics (Dunkerton and Sullivan, 1992; Zhang 2004)


Recommended