“Habitat Assessment Using the QHEI “
Edward T. Rankin
June 6City of Columbus, Level 3 Training Course
Columbus, Ohio
Senior ResearchScientist
QualitativeHabitatEvaluation Index
QHEI Training
FlowRegime
High/LowExtremes
Precipitation &Runoff
Velocity
Land Use
GroundWater
ChemicalVariables
BioticFactors
EnergySource
HabitatStructure
Hardness
Turbidity
pH
D.O.Temperature
AlkalinitySolubilities
Adsorption
Nutrients
Organics
Reproduction
DiseaseParasitism
Feeding
Predation
Competition
Nutrients
Sunlight
Organic MatterInputs 1 and 2
Productiono o
SeasonalCycles
RiparianVegetation
Siltation
CurrentSubstrate
Sinuosity
CanopyInstream
Cover
Gradient
ChannelMorphology
Bank Stability
Width/Depth
INTEGRITY OF THEWATER RESOURCE
“Principal Goal of the Clean Water Act
The Five Major Factors Which Determine the Integrity of Aquatic Resources (from Karr 1981)
Visual Method Tool For Designating Aquatic Life Uses Tool For Assessing Causes of Impairment Correlated With Biological Integrity Associated With Sediment/Nutrient Inputs Effects on Biota Occur At Multiple Scales Matches Resolution of Biological Data
QHEI
Substrate – Size, Quality Instream Cover – Type, Quality, Amount Channel Quality – Sinuosity, Riffle/Pool
Development, Channelization, Stability Riparian Width, Type, Bank Stability Pool, Riffle/Run – Depth, Morphology, Current Types,
Riffle/Run Substrates Stream Gradient – Standardized by Stream Size
QHEI: Six Major Categories of Macrohabitat
Assessing Reach Habitat Features
Level 2◦ This training and site scored independently at last site
tomorrow◦ Sufficient similarity with Instructor Score
Level 3◦ This training and site scored independently (Level II site
above)◦ Three sites scored outside of this training◦ Sufficient similarity with all test sites
Level 2 vs. Level 3 QHEI Certification
Stream Flow Not explicitly
measured in QHEI Reflected in
certain metrics Can be limiting to
aquatic life in many instances
Consider flow regime when interpreting data
Correlated With IBI QHEI and its subcomponents correlated with IBI at multiple
scales
10
20
30
40
50
60
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Data by Site All YearsECBP & HELP EcoregionsReference Sites ONLY
y = 15.4 + 0.39x R2= 0.51
Site
Spe
cific I
BI
Site Specific QHEI
10
20
30
40
50
60
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Data by Huc 11 WatershedI BI Data - 1994-2001
ECBP and HELP Ecoregions
y = 9.98 + 0.43x R2= 0.43
Mea
n Huc
-11 S
cale
IBI
Mean Huc-11 Scale QHEI
Another Way to Examine Correlation of QHEI with IBI: Probability of Attaining Biocriteria
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Ohio Wadeable Reference Data
EWHWWHModified
Prob
abili
ty
QHEI Score
Level III-IV Ecoregions
54c
56b
56a
56c
54a
54b
54d
54a
56d
55b
55f
72b
72c
72a
71a71b
71c
55d
57b57b
57a
55a
55 57
56
61a
61c
61e
61d
61d61b
61c
70e
70c
70b
70a
70f
55b55e
55c
71d
55d
55b
70d
55a
71d
57c 57d
54
72
71
70
69
61
56
70
Indianapolis
Columbus
YoungstownAkron
Cleveland
CantonWooster
Marietta
Toledo
Cincinnati
Dayton
FortWayne
South Bend
Chicago
Bloomington
Louisville
Gary
Lake Michigan
GrandLake
PymatuningLake
MonroeLake
MICHIGANINDIANA
88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81
38
39
40
41
42
39
40
41
42
LEVEL III ECOREGIONS OF OHIO LEVEL III ECOREGIONS OF OHIO (after Omernik 1987)(after Omernik 1987)
HELPHELP
ECBPECBP
IPIP
EOLPEOLP
WAPWAP
Structural features include the numerous components of habitat that include living and non- living attributes.
Parent geology and climatic influences are two factors that influence structural attributes..
Riffle
areas of the stream with fast current velocity and shallow depth;
the water surface is visibly broken by rocks, boulders, etc.
• Functions:– High production zone
for macroinvertebrates– Spawning area for
many sensitive species– Feeding area for
species groups such as darters
– Oxygenation
Functions:◦ Spawning Area◦ Feeding Area◦ Oxygenation◦ Macroinvertebrate
Production
areas of the stream that have a rapid, non-turbulent flow;
runs are deeper than riffles with faster current velocity than pools;
generally located down-stream from riffles where the stream narrows;
the stream bed is often flat beneath a run and the water surface is not visibly broken.
Run
an area of the stream with slow current velocity;
depth greater than riffle and run areas;
the stream bed is often concave;
stream width frequently is the greatest;
the water surface slope is nearly zero.
Functions:◦ Low Flow Refugia◦ Nursery Area◦ Resting Area◦ Cover
Pool
Glide
Flat, “canal-like” flow Shallow, generally
poor habitat Transitional in natural
streams Can be predominant
in channelized and altered streams
PO OL
• Functions:- Shallow nursery areas- Invertebrate production
Erosion:Particulate PD issolved P
Leaves,WoodyDebris
Bacteria,Fungi
Nutrients & SedimentAre Intercepted byRiparian Biom ass
Invertebrates (Shredders,Scrapers)
AlgaeInverts.
Predators
Herbivores
FishPredators
Sunlight isLim ited By
the RiparianVegetation
Two-WayMovement ofSedim ent &
NutrientsWoody Debris
SlowsExport ofSedim ents & Increases
Conversion of Nutrients toDesirable Biom ass Insectivorous
Fish
Humans Bird,Mamm al
Predators
Riparian W idth
G ood Stream Habitat
Major Downstream Exports: I. Desirable Biomass (e.g., fish, plants, birds, mammals, sensitive species) II. Low Sedim ent DeliveryIII. Water Quality Suitable for ALL Uses
O n e- W a y M o v em en to f Sed im en t &
N u t r ient s In t o St rea m s
E rosio n :Sedi m ent w i th
Parti cu late PD isso lv ed P
Fin e Sedim en tB ed lo ad w i th
A lgae & D etr i tus
L a c k o f W oo d y D ebr isI n cr eas es E x po r t &
C o nv er si on o f N u t r ient s t oU nd esi rab le B io m as s
F i l t er F e ed i n gI n v e r te b r a te s ,
D e tr i t i v o r e s
H erbiv o res
D i r ect S un l i ght A ffect s100% o f C h a nn el ;
L i ght i s N o t a L i m i t i n gF a ct o r
G ra sses C om pri se M ajo ri ty o fR i pari an “ Bu ffer”
P red ator s:I n v erteb rates
R a pi d T u rno v er o f N ut r i en t s( “ S ho r t Sp i ra ls ” ) i s a K ey
C h ara c ter i s t ic
N i trates v iaSubsurfaceD rain age
P red ator s:B ird s, M am m a ls
M odified Stream H abitat
External energyis required tomaintain modifiedenvironment andmaintain agricul-turalproduction M ajor D ow nstream E xports:
I . N utrients & U ndesirab le B iom ass (e.g., algae, detritivores, tolerant species)I I . H igh Sed im ent D el ivery
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 - 4 5 - 8 9 - 12 13 - 16 17 - 20
Natural and Modifi ed Ref erence SitesECBP & HELP Ecoregions
QHE
I Sub
stra
te S
core
QHEI Channel Score
Strong Link Between Channel Score and Substrate Score
Fine substrates (e.g., silts) source of attached phosphorus.
Improved channel form will result in higher channel score, higher substrate scores and less nutrients stored in wetted channel
Storm events will re-suspend less nutrients in stream with intact channels than with modified channels
May use pebble count data and sediment nutrient concentration from sediment chemical data to create “hypothetical” loads with various habitat types
QUESTION: How much channel improvement (e.g., full restoration vs. two-stage channel) is needed to significantly reduce nutrients?
http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/monitoring/rbp/
Illinois SHAP U.S. EPA EMAP/NWS Assessment Methods RBP Habitat Form Other State Methods (e.g., quantitative and
qualitative) QHEI has been modified for other environment and
systems (e.g., HHEI, Lake Erie Shoreline, etc)
Other Methods:
Goal is to explain variation we observe in aquatic biology◦ What is relative contribution of habitat condition to observed
biology?◦ What are the factors limiting the biology?◦ When in doubt about meaning of metric
Refer to reference materials Think FUNCTIONALLY! What is hypothetical link between metric
and biology (Think like a fish!)
Remember