Health literacy intervention in Khayelitsha to address community medication sharing
Health in Context: Health Promotion Protocol
Ashleigh Dwarika, Sameenah Hashim, Matthew Leppan, Letang Matlala, Nathan Morar ,Nobuhle Ndhlovu, Noxolo Ndzoyiya, Bjorn Sorensen, Kelly
Sweatman
Contents
Plagiarism declaration:........................................................................................................................2
Authors..................................................................................................................................................3
Acknowledgements...............................................................................................................................3
Abstract.................................................................................................................................................4
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................5
Health promotion activity......................................................................................................................6
Process by which problem for health promotion was identified.......................................................6
Literature review...............................................................................................................................6
Aim..................................................................................................................................................10
Objectives........................................................................................................................................10
Ottawa charter actions....................................................................................................................10
Community participation.................................................................................................................11
Policy...............................................................................................................................................11
Behaviour change theories and approaches applicable in this project............................................12
Planning, design and pre-testing.....................................................................................................13
Messages are distributed through various forms of media i.e. TV and radio. Choosing the medium is therefore an important decision. This decision will depend on the aims and budget..................13
Different educational and mass media approaches.........................................................................13
Role of advocacy..............................................................................................................................15
Stakeholder involvement.................................................................................................................16
Reflections...........................................................................................................................................17
Health rights and ethical principles.....................................................................................................17
Conclusion and recommendations......................................................................................................18
References:..........................................................................................................................................20
Plagiarism declaration:
Names (student number):
Ashleigh Dwarika (DWRASH003), Sameenah Hashim (HSHSAM001), Matthew Leppan (LPPMAT001), Letang Matlala (MTTLET007), Nathan Morar (MRRNAT004), Nobuhle Ndhlovu (NDHNOB001), Noxolo Ndzoyiya (NDZNOX002), Bjorn Sorensen (SRNBJO001), Kelly Sweatman (SWTKEL001)
Course: MBChB
Declaration
We know that plagiarism is wrong. Plagiarism is to use another’s work and pretend that it is one’s own.
We have used the VANCOUVER convention for citation and referencing. Each contribution to, and quotation in, this Health in Context Research Protocol from the work(s) of other people has been attributed, and has been cited and referenced.
This Health in Context Research Protocol is our own work.
We have not allowed, and will not allow, anyone to copy our work with the intention of passing it off as his or her own work.
Signature: ______________________________
Signature:_____________ _________________
Signature:_____________ _________________
Signature:______________________________
Signature: ______________________________
Signature:______________________________
Signature:_____________ _________________
Signature:______________________________
Signature:___________ ___________________
Date: 27 March 2017
Authors
Policy
Bjorn Sorensen
Kelly Sweatman
Behaviour change theories
Letang Matlala
Nathan Morar
Planning, designing, and pretesting of mass media
Ashleigh Dwarika
Sameenah Hashim
Matthew Leppan
Role of advocacy
Nobuhle Ndhlovu
Noxolo Ndzoyiya
Acknowledgements
Site facilitator: Mrs Tsuki Xapa
Key Stakeholder: Mr Kholweni
Hosts of intervention: Meals on Wheels, Zibonele Radio Station
Abstract
Introduction: The sharing of medicine has been identified as a significant health problem in
Khayelitsha. This behaviour is believed to stem mainly from a lack of health literacy around the
dangers of sharing medicine. Other reasons for sharing medicine are long waiting times in the clinics
and the attitudes of health workers. The aim of this health promotion campaign is, therefore, to
educate the community of Khayelitsha on the risks of chronic medication sharing through the
development of educational messages and their distribution using various media forms. Additional
goals of this campaign are to address policy issues that result in inefficiency of clinics and hospitals
and attempt to change the community’s perception of health workers.
Planning the campaign: A community stakeholder and other members of the Khayelitsha community
were involved in identifying and prioritising the issue of medicine sharing, as well as planning the
campaign. Various health promotion tools, such as behaviour change theories, were incorporated
into the planning of the campaign.
Health promotion activities: An interactive radio talk show was delivered by Radio Zibonele that
delivered various education messages about medicine sharing and allowed members of the
community to call in to have their questions and concerns addressed. Posters with detailed
information on medicine sharing were designed and will be put up at Meals on Wheels and finally an
educational skit about the dangers of sharing medicine was performed at Meals on Wheels.
Conclusions and recommendations: Not only was lacking health literacy a cause of medicine sharing
but through community engagement additional reasons for people sharing medicine were identified
such as poor access to health care services, as well as health workers being perceived to have poor
attitudes.
It is important that this health promotion campaign is sustainable. The dramatization and radio
recording will be distributed on social media. In addition, the posters will remain at Meals on
Wheels. Finally, education of health workers on the importance of health literacy will also help
improve the problem of medicine sharing.
Introduction
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), health promotion is the process of enabling
individuals to increase control over, and improve health1. Health literacy, a subheading of health
promotion, is an individual's ability to access, understand and act upon information to promote, and
maintain health2. It can be improved through health promotion interventions, where individuals are
provided with relevant personal, social and cognitive skills. There are many approaches to
interventions which are influenced and decided by relevant behaviour change theories. These
theories act on various levels; individual, interpersonal or community, and multiple theories can be
applied to a single intervention.
The literature indicates multiple socioeconomic factors that shape behaviours and affect health
literacy. Low levels of health literacy are associated with unhealthy behaviours, and poor health
outcomes such as increased mortality and/or morbidity 2. It is the health system's responsibility to
create and promote health literate environments by developing interventions, with varying effects,
and policies to address poor literacy.
Khayelitsha is a low-socioeconomic residential area in the Western Cape with significant disparities
regarding socio-economic factors. These disparities influence the health literacy of the residents 3, 4.
Factors such as low educational levels, occupation and low income negatively impact health literacy.
The stakeholder, Mr Kholweni runs the Meals on wheels NGO in Khayelitsha. This NGO provides
lunch time meals from a community centre as well as delivers meals to resident’s homes. Mr
Kholweni along with other community members, identified health literacy, specifically regarding
medication sharing as a prevalent issue. Due to the high prevalence of chronic disease in the area
people tend to self-diagnose and share medication amongst community members. Their reasons for
sharing medication included the inconvenience of long waiting times at clinics, inaccessibility of
healthcare services at night, a lack of time and/or money, and the assumption that medication is
safe to share. This issue was found to be of importance to us as it was a top priority for the
stakeholder, and is responsible for poor health outcomes that can be easily prevented.
This health promotion intervention was designed to improve health literacy in Khayelitsha by
decreasing sharing of medication. Information was provided to the target population by mass media,
radio, posters and a dramatization. The behaviour change theories applicable to this intervention are
the information processing paradigm and the theory of planned behaviour.
Health promotion activity
Process by which problem for health promotion was identified
Students met with stakeholders at Meals on Wheels. The stakeholders gave the students the topic of
health literacy. In the discussion, the prevalence of chronic medication sharing in the community
was stated. This issue was investigated through a literature review and student discussion. The
discussion yielded an idea of health education on medication sharing at Meals on Wheels and radio
Zibonele. After investigating the feasibility of this idea, it was decided to take this forward as the
intervention.
Literature review
Introduction
Peer reviewed published articles were reviewed to investigate health literacy and its association with
the sharing of medication.
The following search terms were used:
Pubmed: ("Health Literacy"[Mesh]) AND "Health Promotion"[Mesh]).
Google scholar: health literacy * AND sharing medication.
Health literacy is crucial in order to empower individuals and communities regarding health
decisions. It also helps to improve their access to health information and enables them to use this
information effectively 1 . Health literacy is used to educate society about common diseases,
preventative methods and treatment. This is achieved by strategies that are interactive and allow for
community participation e.g. health workshops at clinics and community centres 1.
Factors that affect health literacy include gender, age, race, and education level as well as household
income 5. Due to the legacy of apartheid in South Africa certain members were not afforded the
opportunity to education and other privileges which ultimately resulted in a vicious cycle of poverty.
Unfortunately, even with the cessation of apartheid, this cycle continues today with the result of
poor health literacy levels amongst the same previously oppressed groups.
The research articles show that there is an association with health literacy and health behaviour.
One of the areas which health literacy appears to be needed is in mitigating against inappropriate
sharing of medication. Sharing of medication amongst members with chronic health conditions can
result in adverse health effects on those taking the medication especially if the dosage and type of
medication is incorrect.
There are various methods that can be used to promote health and health literacy, namely
workshops at clinics and community centres, posters, radio and television adverts, and health
professionals being advocates of change for bad health behaviour.
The sharing of medication has been identified as a local issue in Khayelitsha, but there is limited local
and internationally research regarding it.
Factors associated with health literacy
Many demographic and socio-economic factor affected poor health literacy. These include; male
gender, older age, lower education level, and low household income 4, 5. Females also had higher
adequate literacy levels than males (42.4 % to 39.5 %). Other factors included race 5, marital
conditions 5, and suburban participants had lower scores than urban participants1.
Health literacy and health behaviours
In a systematic review of 11 articles, there was a statistically significant association between health
literacy and medication adherence (r <0.09, p <0.0001). A low health literacy level resulted in 52.2%
non-adherence compared to 19.5% in those with marginal health literacy. Low levels of health
literacy were associated with poor knowledge of HIV treatment and low self-efficacy for following
treatment regimen 3.
Health literacy and health outcomes
The aim of health literacy is to empower patients with sufficient information to make informed
decisions about their health. It was determined that 58% of patients seldom require help with
interpreting written medical information 6. This indicates that just less than half do not fully
understand written material which affects health behaviour and outcomes.
Health literacy is an issue for many people who are living with HIV (PLWH). PLWH with low health
literacy have lower CD4 +T cell counts, higher viral loads, decreased ART uptake, increased
hospitalizations and poorer health. They are also less likely to adhere to ART and have poor
understanding of HIV infection and the potential for progression if untreated 6.
Other research shows that improving health literacy of diabetes was effective in improving self-
management, diabetes knowledge, and HbA1c control in both adequate and limited health literacy
group 5.
Unhealthy behaviours and health literacy
There are two pathways that link health literacy with health status. One pathway intermediated by
health information access and another intermediated by health behaviour. Those with higher health
literacy as measured by the 14-item Health Literacy Scale (HLS-14) were significantly more likely to
get sufficient health information from multiple sources (p <0.0001), less likely to have risky habits of
smoking (p<0.001), regular drinking (p<0.001), and lack of exercise (p=0.050), and in turn, more
likely to report good self-rated health (p=0.048) 5, 7.
Medication sharing
An online survey using Irish students showed 26% reported borrowing, 20% reported sharing and
12% reported both sharing and borrowing prescription drugs, primarily to avoid the cost (37%), the
inconvenience of going to a doctor (22%) and not feeling sick enough to see a medical professional
(14%). Participants borrowed medicines from family (51.2%) and friends (18.2%). Those who
borrowed or shared prescription drugs believed they were at a lesser risk of side effects from taking
other people’s medicines (p < 0.0005, χ2 test) 8.
A similar trend was found in the United States, where 22.9% of 700 participants claimed to have lent
out prescription medication and 26.9% said they borrowed prescription medication 9.
Analgesics were found to be the most common self-administered drug. In a questionnaire and focus
group, 55% and 76% of participants respectively admitted to sharing prescription analgesics to which
their attitude was that it was normal. Potential negative effects were not a concern 10.
Minimal research regarding sharing of chronic medication in South Africa were found.
Interventions affecting health literacy
Various studies have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness on interventions in improving
health literacy. One intervention was Text4baby where text messages were used to provide
educational messages to both pregnant and post-partum females. This was effective in improving
health literacy 11.
School-level education 12, 13 significantly enhanced knowledge surrounding pain medication and
allowed people to be more self-efficient in taking pain medication and improving long term mental
health literacy11, 12.
Group education sessions, providing specific individualized information, telephonic counselling and
assistance with attending health facilities i.e. appointment making, transport and translation
improved health literacy and health seeking behaviour 14.
Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) should be improved to promote health literacy. PIL are only useful
to literate people and only 10% of PIL promoted management of illnesses and healthy lifestyles 15.
Patients who take medication incorrectly often do so because they misunderstand the prescription
labels and the risk increased with decreased language proficiency. Labels that are easier to read,
have clear instructions, prioritise information with larger font and increase white space significantly
improved the use of the drug for English patients but not for Spanish patients 16.
Conclusion
Health literacy is determined by many socioeconomic factors and affects health behaviour and
outcomes. Interventions have been shown to have varying effects on health literacy, but can be
effective. The literature on medication sharing is predominately done in developed countries and it
is therefore difficult to extrapolate this data to South Africa, especially low socio-economic areas
such as Khayelitsha. Medication sharing and improving its associated health literacy may be an
important factor in improving health behaviour and outcomes.
Aim
To educate the community of Khayelitsha on the risks of chronic medication sharing.
Objectives
Create a health education intervention on chronic medication sharing.
Implementation of the intervention to improve health literacy and health outcomes.
Ottawa charter actions
Create supportive environments
During the planning of the intervention, the aim was to create effective community action 4, through
the education on the consequences of self-medication and self-diagnosis. This would promote
personal responsibility for community members to attend clinics and not share medication.
Hopefully, through the provision of information and the screening activities, community members
will feel empowered to take ownership and control of their health 4.
Develop personal skills
This intervention strives to support personal and social development1 through the provision of
health education. This was achieved through providing information in their first language, isiXhosa.
This would enable the community to fully understand the information and enable them to exercise
better control over their own health and environments and make choices conducive to their health 4.
Community participation
Prior to the intervention, the enthusiasm with which the stakeholders and community members
engaged showed a clear understanding of the major problems within the community. This made it
possible to plan and execute a successful and helpful intervention.
The community took well to the intervention. There were approximately 50 people in attendance
and community members actively participated. Many people volunteered to answer questions.
During the radio presentation there were many callers wanting to engage and ask questions. The
radio ensured a wide distribution of information. The community participation can be attributed to
the various forms of health promotion that was used in isiXhosa. The notable willingness of the
community to engage and participate made this intervention very successful.
Policy
The sharing of chronic medication is difficult to regulate using policy. Dispensing of chronic
medication is already tightly regulated. People however share medication regardless of the dangers
of running out before their next clinic appointment. The issue is the lack of health literacy within the
community. This is therefore a behaviour change and education issue and not one of inadequate
policy.
Looking into the reasons why people share medication, and developing policy around it, may be
useful. Reasons identified by members of the community include long waiting times at clinics. It was
the community stakeholders who identified medication sharing as an issue. Other stakeholders
involve doctors and pharmacists who prescribe and dispense medication. National managers will
ensure adequate resource allocation as well as the local clinic managers to ensure efficiency of the
clinics. In addition, a top-down approach which would also be required to address the fundamental
issues of poverty and inequality of access.
The South African government conceptualized The Ideal Clinic Initiative in attempt to achieve
efficiency, equity, effectiveness and quality in the healthcare system. Improving waiting times was
included in this. An eight month study was conducted to determine what factors would make clinics
ideal. The findings are intended to be implemented as part of the National Health Insurance policy.
The evaluation will be done by conducting a similar study in order to formulate policy as well as to
compare the results of the two studies 17.
Furthermore, HealthCare 2030, which is an official Western Cape Government document, aims
towards a more patient-centred system with improved access to quality care. Their vision includes
patients not having to wait for longer than reasonable. All patients will make appointments (except
in emergencies) and their files will be readily available for this reason.
The files will also be electronic which will further decrease waiting time. With the vision of such an
improved system, it is hoped that patients will be more satisfied; staff will be empowered, “the
community takes responsibility for its health” 18 and that the Western Cape Department of Health
runs a coherent and efficient health system and is corruption-free with their employees being
recognised and respected. The provincial government will mobilise other departments to improve
the health of society and address other social-determinants of health 18.
Behaviour change theories and approaches applicable in this project
Information processing paradigm:
The theory of information processing paradigm often works in relation to other theories. The theory
operates at an individual level and uses communication to persuade people to make healthy
behaviour changes. It is applicable to our intervention as it aimed to persuade people to stop
sharing medications, especially those for chronic conditions.
The three phases of message processing were followed throughout.
The first phase draws attention to the message. Posters were colourful and would attract attention.
Secondly, the presentation used a dramatization that depicted the dangers of medicine sharing. This
captivated viewers and illustrated the potentially fatal consequences. The dramatization was age
appropriate and wasn’t childish or undermined the information. The second phase speaks of
comprehensive content. Posters were in the participant’s first-language, isiXhosa, and translators
were used during the presentation. Furthermore, information was divided into subcategories
allowing for manageable portions as to not overwhelm the participants. Lastly, with acceptance of
the content, the participant’s socioeconomic difficulties and reasons for sharing medication were
acknowledged and this was considered in the intervention development. Practical information and
recommendations were used that were realistic in the participant’s socioeconomic context.
Theory of planned behaviour
This theory links beliefs and behaviour. It builds on the theory of reasoned action. The reasoned
action theory only includes attitude towards behaviour and subjective norms, and this theory adds
perceived behavioural control. These three factors contribute to behavioural intentions and
behaviour action 19.
The health promotion participants’ attitudes towards medication sharing were that sharing chronic
medication wasn’t dangerous. They weren’t aware of the dangers and believed chronic medication
to be freely usable between individuals. This was addressed by providing information on the dangers
of sharing common chronic medication.
The subjective norms were that chronic medication sharing was accepted and common in the
community. The majority of the community was unaware of the dangers and shared chronic
medication freely. This was addressed by providing information to change this common attitude.
Participants’ perceived behavioural control was evident as they were sharing medication.
Community members had medication to share and therefore the patients were able to freely
acquire medication in the community. This was not addressed because we do not want to restrict
medication access in the community. We rather encouraged participants to seek medical care and
acquire their own medication.
Planning, design and pre-testing
What makes a good health promotion campaign?
Health promotion campaigns involve two aspects. Firstly, developing the message and secondly
distributing the message 20.
When developing the message, there are important points to consider. Researching the problem is
important e.g. whether it is a communication problem. This could be targeted by educational
campaigns. The context of the participants involved must be understood. The target audience must
be known. The information must be evidence based. The information must be appropriate to media
e.g. not too long if on radio/TV. The nature of the message must; have the correct language, be
positive (positive messages are more effective), simple, and have a clear message 21.
Messages are distributed through various forms of media i.e. TV and radio. Choosing the medium is
therefore an important decision. This decision will depend on the aims and budget.
Different educational and mass media approaches
Our health promotion campaign made use of three forms of media, namely posters, radio and a
dramatization. This increased the distribution of the information and ensured the target audience
had repeated opportunities to grasp the health promotion message. Below we discuss each medium
that was used and evaluate its effectiveness in achieving the goals of the health promotion
campaign.
Posters
Posters are a positive medium through which to deliver health promotion information as they
enable detailed educational information to be shared. They can also be permanent/placed in a fixed
position which repeatedly exposes people to the information. Posters, however, need to attract
attention and be placed in effective positions.
Evaluation of posters
The posters were very effective. They were big, colourful, laminated (protected against damage) and
printed in isiXhosa – one the biggest advantages to our posters as this is the home language for
majority of the people in Khayelitsha, making them easily understood. They also contained more
information than what was delivered in the dramatization. This will enable people to gain access to
detailed information about the topic of medicine sharing. The posters will remain at Meals on
Wheels on display. Hundreds of people attend this feeding scheme, so the information will be widely
distributed.
Disadvantages were the printing costs which restricted the number of posters to two. Mass
production would have increased the information distribution. The posters may have contained too
much content which can deter readers.
Radio
Radio is mass media and can reach a large number of people. In 1998, approximately 72% of South
Africans used radio 20.Radio is also an inexpensive medium. This makes radio a good choice to deliver
health promotion information due to wide coverage and cheap costs.
Evaluation of the radio talk show
An interactive talk show was held between 10 and 11 am on Wednesday 22nd March on Radio
Zibonele FM 98.2, a radio station that covers the whole of Khayelitsha and is often involved in health
related issues. People were able to call in and get their concerns and questions, regarding sharing
medicine, addressed. The radio presentation was also valuable to understand the beliefs and
attitudes of the community. The radio presentation was very successful because; it reached a wide
audience, had audience interaction, it was inexpensive and was allocated a substantial time slot.
The radio talk show was limited because the allotted time slot was in the late morning when many
people are at work. Superficial messages were given due to the time constraints.
There was only an audio component to the presentation; messages are most effective when an
audio and visual component are used together. The radio talk show is once off, so the sustainability
of this aspect of the campaign is limited.
Dramatization
Dramatizations are effective ways to provide information as they are thought provoking and
stimulate debate. They can simultaneously entertain and educate. Participants can relate and
develop emotional responses to the characters and this may make it easier to adopt new
behaviours20.
Evaluation of the dramatization
The dramatization occurred at Meals on Wheels while people waited for their food. The
dramatization used actors and illustrated the dangers of sharing medication.
The short dramatization was well received. It was funny and informative. It worked well because the
information was relatable and understandable. It was inexpensive and time efficient.
The limitations of the dramatization was that the information was superficial. The dramatization
was once off and not sustainable. The dramatization was recorded, and may be distributed via a
webpage for further education use.
Role of advocacy
Advocating for people at an individual level, involves providing clear instructions about the
consumption of medication. Therefore, individuals who lack health literacy should be relayed
information at a level catered for them.
Community level
According to the stakeholder, individuals within the community share their medication. By
investigating why this occurs, clearly defined outcomes can be established1. For example, many
people don’t go the clinic because they are discouraged by the attitude received from health
workers.
The project aimed to address this by medical students going into the community and offering
screening services. The attitudes conveyed by the students, provided reassurance that affordable,
appropriate and acceptable care can be achieved by all health care workers.
The use of the local radio station advocated that more health education programs on self-
management for community members should occur on a regular basis.
Lobbying 22 consisted of the community’s role models meeting with the 4th year medical students in
order to make influential decisions. This facilitated the co-ordination of events such as health
promotion, where issues regarding the sharing of medication were addressed.
A forum1 took place, which encouraged the community members not to share their medication. This
is because it enabled them to communicate their concerns as to why they don’t attend the clinic,
thus prompting members to assist one another.
National level
Advocating for the availability of medication at all health facilities as well as better health care
access. In addition, providing an opportunity for the health workers to advocate for policy change
regarding the distribution of medication by the pharmacy without a prescription. This will promote
health by preventing the health consequences associated with the consumption of medication for a
disease, which hasn’t been confirmed by a doctor 23.
Stakeholder involvement
The experience with the stakeholder was not as valuable as hoped. Three meeting slots were
allocated, but only two were used and instead there was communication via email. The first meeting
wasn’t informative and there was little information to progress in creating the intervention. In the
second meeting, there was an attempt to clarify exactly what was expected. Some information was
provided, but a clear picture of the task and requirements was still lacking. In hindsight, the concerns
of the group have expressed the concerns differently and reached out to the stakeholder. This could
have resulted in a better work process. Overall, there was good collaboration with the stakeholder
to achieve the health promotion goal.
Reflections
There is great pride in the effort of the members and contribution to the community. Initially, it was
difficult to fully understand the topic, but with further guidance, the issues became clear. It was
difficult when visiting Meals on Wheels and witnessing the extreme socioeconomic challenges
specifically food insecurity. The project as whole was challenging especially working as a group with
time and budget constraints. In hindsight, the importance of good time management, open
communication and organization is evident. When preparing for the intervention, the language
barrier was an issue and it was initially decided to provide all information in English. After reflecting,
it was decided to provide the information in isiXhosa for the benefit of the participants. Overall, the
project was of great value and provided a good exposure to the harsh realities of a low SES
community. It gave the opportunity to try provide something of benefit to the community. The help
of the group facilitator, Mrs Xapa, is greatly appreciated who without, the interventions would not
have been possible.
Health rights and ethical principles
Health Rights
All health rights stem from the Bill of Rights in Chapter 2 of the 1996 Constitution of the Republic of
South Africa. It states, “Everyone has the right to have access to health care services, including
reproductive health care “ 24.
The interventions featured aspects of the Patients' Rights Charter25. Health information in the
participant’s language of choice was addressed through an intervention in isiXhosa. Information
regarding illness, treatment and the costs involved, was addressed by providing specific disease
related health information and a brief outline of treatment.
Autonomy
The setting of the intervention did not allow for full autonomy. Participants viewed the health
promotion activity while waiting for their food and had little choice in participation. While the
student group were allocate this time, autonomy was still breeched.
Informed consent was ensured by explaining the content and reason for the health promotion
before the activity. It was also ensured during screening via pre and post-test counselling.
Participants were free to withdraw from the screening at any time.
The participants were provided fresh fruit. Withdrawing from the presentation or screening did not
exclude them from partaking in the fruit.
Beneficence
The benefit of participating in the health promotion presentation was gaining knowledge and
improving the health literacy of the participant. The benefit of participating in the screening process
was knowing the result of the screening test and receiving a referral letter if needed.
Non maleficence
The risk to the participants was discomfort during the screening process, and potential psychological
harm from the screening result. This was minimized through pre and post-test counselling.
Justice
Unfortunately participants were not equitably selected for health promotion. All participants were
unfairly coerced into attending as leaving could result in not receiving a meal. There was however
distributive justice as those taking the burden of the research received the benefits in the form of
knowledge.
Conclusion and recommendations
Conclusion
Engaging with the community showed that the sharing of medication was not only a result of low
health literacy, but also factors such as poor access to health care services due to the heavy burden
of health services. The attitude of health workers also contributed to the fact that some patients do
not return for their appointments as well as the attitude affected the health care seeking behavior of
the people within the community. The low levels of socioeconomic status also contributed to the
people within the community not being able to access health care services especially those who had
to travel to certain clinics or hospitals.
Recommendations
It is important to treat each patient according to their socioeconomic context.
There must be provision of manageable information for patients at the level of their understanding
to prevent misunderstandings, as well as to make patients understand what medication they have in
their possession and its dangers.
Sustain the intervention, and distribute the dramatization and radio recording on social media.
Allow the posters to remain at Meals on Wheels and provide posters for community health clinics.
Educate health workers on the importance of health literacy and ensuring that they continue
informing patients on the risks of chronic medication sharing.
References:
1. Word Health Organisation. Health Promotion. [Online].2017 [cited 2017. Mar 27] Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/health_promotion/en/
2. Rudd RE. Needed action in health literacy. Journal of Health Psychology. 2013;18(8):1004-10.
3. Wolf MS, Davis TC, Osborn CY, Skripkauskas S, Bennett CL, Makoul G. Literacy, self-efficacy, and HIV medication adherence. Patient education and counseling. 2007;65(2):253-60.
4. Zhang D, Wu S, Zhang Y, Yang P, MacIntyre CR, Seale H, et al. Health literacy in Beijing: an assessment of adults’ knowledge and skills regarding communicable diseases. BMC public health. 2015;15(1):799.
5. Liu Y-B, Liu L, Li Y-F, Chen Y-L. Relationship between Health Literacy, Health-Related Behaviors and Health Status: A Survey of Elderly Chinese. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2015;12(8):9714-25.
6. McCall J, Wilson C. Promoting health literacy in an HIV-infected population: Creating staff awareness. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 2015;26(4):498-502.
7. Suka M, Odajima T, Okamoto M, Sumitani M, Igarashi A, Ishikawa H, et al. Relationship between health literacy, health information access, health behavior, and health status in Japanese people. Patient education and counseling. 2015;98(5):660-8.
8. Goulding E, Murphy M, Di Blasi Z. Sharing and borrowing prescription medication: a survey of Irish college students. Irish journal of medical science. 2011;180(3):687-90.
9. Goldsworthy RC, Schwartz NC, Mayhorn CB. Beyond abuse and exposure: framing the impact of prescription-medication sharing. American Journal of Public Health. 2008;98(6):1115-21.
10. Markotic F, Vrdoljak D, Puljiz M, Puljak L. Risk perception about medication sharing among patients: a focus group qualitative study on borrowing and lending of prescription analgesics. Journal of Pain Research. 2017;10:365.
11. Poorman E, Gazmararian J, Elon L, Parker R. Is health literacy related to health behaviors and cell phone usage patterns among the text4baby target population? Archives of Public Health. 2014;72(1):13.
12. Mcluckie A, Kutcher S, Wei Y, Weaver C. Sustained improvements in students’ mental health literacy with use of a mental health curriculum in Canadian schools. BMC psychiatry. 2014;14(1):379.
13. Chang F-C, Chi HY, Huang LJ, Lee CH, Yang JL, Yeh MK. Developing school-pharmacist partnerships to enhance correct medication use and pain medication literacy in Taiwan. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 2015;55(6):595-602.
14. Schuster AL, Frick KD, Huh B-Y, Kim KB, Kim M, Han H-R. Economic evaluation of a community health worker-led health literacy intervention to promote cancer screening among Korean American women. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved. 2015;26(2):431.
15. Protheroe J, Estacio EV, Saidy-Khan S. Patient information materials in general practices and promotion of health literacy: an observational study of their effectiveness. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(632):e192-e7.
16. Wolf MS, Davis TC, Curtis LM, Bailey SC, Knox JP, Bergeron A, et al. A patient-centered prescription drug label to promote appropriate medication use and adherence. Journal of general internal medicine. 2016;31(12):1482-9.
17. National Health Insurance - NHI Documents 2016 [Internet]. Health.gov.za. 2017 [cited 29 March 2017]. Available from: http://www.health.gov.za/index.php/nhi/category/267-nhi-2016?download
18. HEALTHCARE 2030 [Internet]. Western Cape Government. 2017 [cited 29 March 2017]. Available from: https://www.westerncape.gov.za/text/2013/October/health-care-2030-9-oct-2013.pdf
19. Health Promotion workshop 2: Behaviour change theory, developing a health promotion plan and preparation for stakeholder engagement 2. Lecture presented at; 2017; University of Cape Town.
20. Coulson N, Goldstein S, Ntuli A, Usdin S. Promoting health in South Africa: An action manual: Heinemann; 1998.
21. Noar SM. A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: Where do we go from here? Journal of health communication. 2006;11(1):21-42.
22. Datay I. Health promotion lecture. Presentation presented at; 2017; University of Cape
Town.
23. Ndhlovu N. Home reflective visit assignment. Presentation presented at; 2017; University of Cape Town.
24. Africa RoS. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996. Government Printer Pretoria; 1996.
25. Health Professions Council of South Africa. National Patients’ Rights Charter [Internet]. 2008 [Cited 28 March 2017]. Available from: http://www.hpcsa.co.za/downloads/conduct_ethics/rules/generic_ethical_rules/booklet_3_patients_rights_charter.pdf