CHAPTER - III
HEALTH PLANNING IN
MAHARASHTRA STATE
3.1 INTORDUCTION
Located in the north centre of peninsula of India, with the command of
Arabian Sea, Marathi speaker occupied, ranking in second position in case of
population (census 2001) and ranking in third position in case of area
Maharashtra is the leading state of the Indian Republic. According to census
2001, Maharashtra population was 9.69 crore, the percentage of urban
population in the State was 42.6 and Maharashtra was second most urbanised
state after Tamil Nadu. At the same time out total of the population, 57.6 per
cent people were residing in 43722 villages.
The present chapter deals with the constitutional provision of public
health expenditure, health infrastructure in the state and its impact on health
indicators especially with the reference of rural area of Maharashtra State.
3.2 PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM AT STATE GOVERNMENT
LEVEL
A State Health Department, being one degree nearer the individual
citizen, has greater authority than any other jurisdiction and a more intimate
relation to local health departments that the Central government. 1According to
Constitution of India health is the subject of the state government. The
Directive Principles of the Indian Constitution enunciate that, “the state shall
regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its
people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties”
72
(Article 47). After the making health policy for health by central government, it
is the responsibility of the state government to execute the policy. In this
direction the implementation, surveillance and providing technical assistance at
local level are functions to be accomplished by the state governments. To
provide medical services and public health facilities to the people are the main
functions of the state governments, in it includes the Hospitals, pharmaceuticals
and similar services. Due to decentralisation of democracy, Zila Parishad
provides all kinds of health services to the rural area, while in the urban area it
is the responsibility of Municipal Corporation. For the convenience of study
the public health scheme is divided into two parts, 1. Environmental Health
Services and 2. Personal Health services. The local government performs these
functions on behalf of state governments.
1. Environmental Health Services
In order to control and eradicate epidemics and other diseases, sanitation
services played a vital role. The state government did not perform this kind of
work directly, however, the local governments have to accomplish this work.
Environmental Health Services include the services such as public sanitation
services. The state government provides medical and health, guidance and
surveillance related, help to all local governments.
2. Personal Health Services
The purpose of environmental health is to bring about conditions that
will promote health and prevent diseases. The concept of environment includes
water supply, disposal of wastes, and housing, personal hygiene and disease
control. Personal health services refer to the health services where people
benefited individually by the health services. It includes the Maternal and Child
Health Services, School Health Programmes, etc. At the same time it includes
the hospitals, doctors, nurses and paramedical staff who treat the patients. In
case of rural area the state government deputed the functions like
environmental health services to the Village Panchyat, while the personal
health services were deputed to the Zila Parishad.
73
3.3 HEALTH ADMINISTRATION IN THE
MAHARASHTRA STATE
In all States, the management sector comprises of the State Ministry of
Health and A Director of Health. The State Health Ministry is headed by the
Minister of Health and Family Welfare who is elected by the people. The
Health Secretary is usually a senior I.A.S. Officer. The Health Ministry deals
mainly with administration, and policy decisions, approval of plans, finance
and Budget. The Health Directorate is headed by the Directorate of Health
Services. He is the chief technical adviser to the State Government on health
matters. The Director of Health Services has several assistants who are MCH,
Family Welfare, Nutrition, Communicable Diseases and Health Education.
Functions of the State Health Director
The functions of the State Health Director are given below:
1. Formulating the plan for health services, directing the approved health
programmes and evaluating them.
2. Rendering preventive services and curative health services
3. Supervision of PHCs through the organisation of District Health Services
4. Control of milk and food sanitation and adulteration
5. Execution of central government health programmes e.g. MCH and Family
Welfare
6. Recruitment of personnel for rural health services
7. Training of P.H. Nurses, Sanitarians, Health Assistants and Health Workers,
(former ANMs).
8. Promotion of health education and nutrition programmes
9. Collection of vital statistics
10. Co-ordination of health with other Ministries of the State, with the Central
Health Ministry and with voluntary agencies.
74
3.4 HEALTH ORGANISATION
Medical Services in Maharashtra States was organised in the beginning
of the 19th
century. The year 1942 was considered an important landmark
regarding more recent origin of Health Services. Till recently the Medical and
Public Health Department were functioning independently of each other at the
State, Divisional and District levels. The Medical Department was under the
Surgeon General and the Public health Department worked under the Director
of Public Health.
The Medical Department looked after curative medical care as well as
Medical Education including training of medical and para-medical medical
personnel and the Public Health Department was in-charge of preventive health
services and family planning. Thus the responsibility for Medical Care and
Education on the one hand and that for Medical Care in rural areas, control of
communicable diseases, maternal and child health education on the other, was
clearly divided into two separate and independent compartments. To achieve
proper coordination in total health care and to avoid duplication of efforts and
overlapping of work an integration of these two services became necessary.
Government took steps in this direction and from 1970,1 the post of Director of
Public Health was abolished and the post of Director of Health Services was
created with Headquarters at Bombay to control both Medical and Public
Health Services in the State excluding Medical Education and Research.
Similarly the post of ‘Surgeon General’ was abolished and instead the post of
Director of Medical Education and Research was created.
The Director of Health Services is assisted by five Joint Directors of
Health Services, two being stationed at Bombay and the other three at Pune.
Out of the three Joint Directors at Pune one looks exclusively after Family
Planning, Maternal and Child Health and School health work. Further, the
Deputy Directors of Medical Services and Deputy Directors of Public Health
Services were changed to Deputy Directors of Health Services (Bombay).
Besides the Joint Directors of Health Services, there is a Deputy Director of
Health Services. The whole State, at the Divisional Level, has been divided
75
into Seven Circles for convenience of administration and each Circle is in-
charge of a Deputy Director of Health Services.
All the health related functions are performed by the minister of health.
These functions are performed by the Urban Development Minister through the
local governments instead of Minister of Health. In case of urban area Urban
Development Minister surveys the work of Municipal Corporation and
Corporation. There is also a Health Officer in the corporation to carry out the
health programmes. The Ministry of Health provides technical guidance to
them, but cannot interfere in the work or directly supervise them. This is same
in the case of rural area. The health officer of the Zila Parishad and their
assistant health officer carry out the health programmes through the health staff.
HEALTH BODIES
3.4.1 STATE HEALTH MISSION
Recognizing the importance of health in the process of economic and
social development and improving the quality of life of our citizen particularly
of poor and vulnerable section of the population the central government has
resolved to launch the National Rural Health Mission to carry out the necessary
architectural correction in the basic health care delivery system. The mission
adopts a synergic approach relating health to the determinant of good health
viz. segment of nutrition, sanitation, hygiene and safe drinking water. It also
aims at mainstreaming the Indian system of medicines to facilitate health care.
The plan of action includes increasing public expenditure on health,
reducing regional imbalances in health infrastructure, pooling resources
integration of organizational structure, optimization of health management
decentralization of district management of health programs, community
participation, ownership of assets induction of management and financial
personnel into the district health system and operationalization of community
health center into functional hospital meeting Indian public health standard in
each block of the state.
76
The implementation of the National Rural Health Mission with
architectural correction was under active consideration of the Government of
Maharashtra. In this regard Government of Maharashtra has passed the
following resolution:
Resolution: Government is pleased to constitute a State Health Mission on the
lines of the National Rural Health Mission. Composition of mission is as
follows:
Hon. Chief Minister is the Chairperson, Hon. Dy. Chief Minister is Co.
chairperson, and Hon. Minister Public Health is Dy. Chairman. Hon.
Additional Chief Secretary is the member secretary. The State Health Mission
meets at least once in every 6 months. The business of the mission is as follow:
• Providing health system oversight
• Consideration of policy matters related with health sector (including
determinants of good health) review of progress in implementation of
NRHM.
• Inter sectoral coordination
• Advocacy measures required to promote NRHM visibility.
The state health mission was constituted on15th
October 2005
3.4.2 STATE HEALTH SOCEITY
The state health society was constituted on 24th October 2005. State
health society comprises of governing body and executive committee, which
serves in an additional managerial and technical capacity to the dept of public
health for effective implementation of NRHM / RCH II.
a) The governing body has Chief Secretary as the Chairperson, Principal
Secretary Planning Department as the co-chair person and Additional Chief
Secretary Health as the Vice-Chairperson. Mission Director is the member
secretary of the governing body. The committee has also nominated non
77
official members and representatives from development partners as members.
The business of the governing body is as follows :
• Approval /endorsement of annual state action plan for the NRHM.
• Consideration of proposals for institutional reforms in health and family
welfare sector.
• Review of implementation of annual action plan
• Inter sector coordination: all NRHM related sectors and beyond
(e.g. administrative reforms across the state)
• Status of follow up action on decision of the State Health Mission.
• Coordination with NGOs / donors / other agencies / organizations.
b) The executive body has Additional Chief Secretary Health as the
Chairperson, Commissioner Family Welfare as the Co-chair Person and
Director Health Services as the Vice-Chairperson. Mission Director is the
member secretary of the executive body. These committee has also nominated
non official members and representative from development partners as
members. The business of the executive body is as follows:
• Detailed implementation and expenditure review
• Approval of proposals from district and other implementing agencies /
district action plan
• Execution of the approved state action plan, including release of funds
for programmes at state level as per annual action plan
• Release of funds to the district health society
• Finalization of working arrangement for intra sectoral and inter-sectoral
coordination.
• Follow up action on decision of the governing body.
After sanction of state action plan by the governing body of the State
Health Society and of district plans by executive committee funds are released
through joint signature of authorized signatories.
78
3.4.3 DISTRICT HEALTH MISSION
On the lines of State Health Mission every district has a District Health
Mission headed by the Chairperson Zila Parishad and District Collector as the
Co-chairperson and Chief Executive Officer as the Mission Director. To
support the District Health Mission every district has a District Integrated
Health and Family Welfare Society and all the existing societies are merged in
it.
3.5 SOME IMPORTANT HEALTH PROGRAMMES RUN BY
PUBLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN MAHARASHTRA
STATE
To cure the disease and heal the injuries and give relief from pains to the
patients is the first responsibility of every public health center. At the same
time, execution of the various health programs deputed by the Central and State
Government is also the responsibility of public health centers. Hitherto several
measures have been undertaken by the Central and State Government to
improve the health of the people. However, The Central Government cannot
maintain an organization reaching every individual and protecting every
community with adequate service. Not only would such an organization fail;
but in this country of local government such a situation would not and should
not be tolerated. It is but slightly less absurd to expect a state.3 State
Government has successfully implemented these programs through the public
health care system. A brief account of these programs which are currently in
operation is given below :
3.5.1 FAMILY WELFARE
The family welfare program is being implemented in the State since
1957. It is a high priority program. To stabilize population and improve quality
of life is the main objective of this program. Sterilization program under family
welfare is well established in the state. During the 2008-09 there were 238.5
79
thousand sterilization operations performed with different sterilization methods
in the State, however the target (450 thousand) was not achieved.4
3.5.2 REPRODUCTIVE AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMME (RCH)
With an objective to improve the performance of family welfare in
reducing maternal and infant mortality, unwanted pregnancies and thus lead to
population stabilization the Second Phase of Reproductive and Child Health
(RCH-II) was launched on 1st April, 2005 for period of five year. During the
2008-09 Rs. 224.64 crore were sanctioned and an expenditure 0of Rs. 177.16
crore was incurred under the RCH.5
3.5.3 JANANI SURAKSHA YOJANA (JSY)
The Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) is a modified scheme of National
Maternal Benefit Scheme. JSY is being implemented in the State since 2005-06
with objective of reducing maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting
institutional deliveries among the poor pregnant women. Under the scheme, for
urban area, Rs. 600 and for rural area Rs. 700 is given to the beneficiary after
delivery in the institution within seven days while for home delivery an amount
of Rs. 500 is given to the beneficiaries having up to two living children. During
the 2008-09 Rs. 23.81 crore expenditure was incurred under the same scheme.6
3.5.4 NATIONAL RURAL HEALTH MISSION (NRHM)
Recognizing the importance of health in the process of economic and
social development and to improve the quality of life of its citizens National
Rural Health Mission (NRHM) was launched on 12th
April, 2005. The main
aim of NRHM is to provide accessible, affordable, accountable, effective and
reliable primary health care and bridging the gap between rural health care
through creation of a cadre of Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA). The
mission will be an instrument to integrate multiple vertical programs along
with their funds at the district level. The programs to be integrated are existing
80
programs of health and family welfare including RCH-II; National Vector
Borne Disease Control Programs against malaria, filaria, kala azar, dengue
fever, etc.; National Leprosy Irradiation Program, National Tuberculosis
Program, National Program for Control of Blindness, Iodine Deficiency
Disorder Control Program and Integrated Disease Surveillance Project. The
NRHM also attempts to make effective integration of health determinants like
sanitation and hygiene, nutrition and safe drinking water.7
3.5.5 SCHOOL HEALTH PROGRAM
Under this programme students from I to IV standard are examined
every year and are provided free of cost medical services. For needy students
even major operations like cardiac surgeries are provided free of cost. During
2008-09 about 108.02 lakh students from 79543 schools throughout the State
were examined and primary treatment was given for illness and referral
services were provided for major illness.8
3.5.6 UNIVERSAL IMMUNIZATION
Universal Immunization Program was started in 1985-86 to achieve 100
per cent immunization and to reduce mortality and morbidity among infant and
young children due to vaccine preventable diseases such as Tuberculosis (T.B.),
diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus, polio, measles. The immunization
programs include the vaccination like BCG, DPT, Polio, Hib, Measles, DT,
Tetanus etc. Over the period, coverage of different vaccination is increasing but
it has yet to reach the cent per cent target. During 2008-09 the State
Government has incurred an expenditure of Rs. 11.26 crore under this head.9
3.5.7 PULSE POLIO PROGRAM
The Pulse Polio Immunization Program is the largest ever conducted
program of immunization in every country across the world. In India, with
intension to eradicate polio disease from all over the country Pulse Polio
81
Immunization Program was started on 9th
December 1995. Maharashtra State
has made good progress in controlling the spread of wild polio virus in the
State. Under this programme, all children below 5 years of age are given dose
of oral polio vaccine. During 2008-09 an expenditure of Rs. 26.64 crore was
incurred for the program.
3.5.8 NATIONAL AIDS CONTROL PROGRAM (NACP)
Looking at the gravity of HIV infections in the country, Government of
India started National AIDS Control Program (NACP) in the year 1987. It is a
100 per cent centrally sponsored scheme implemented in the State through
Maharashtra State AIDs Control Society (MSACS). Monitoring HIV
supervisors, controlling STDs, controlling the spread of HIV infection from
mother to child, condom promotion, provision of antiretroviral treatment,
school aids education, AIDS telephone helpline, etc. are the major features of
NACP. 10
3.5.9 NATIONAL VECTOR BORN DISEASE PROGRAM
National Vector Born Disease Control Program (NVBDCP) is being
implemented for prevention and control of vector borne disease like Malaria,
Lymphatic Filariasis, Japanese Encephalitis (JE), Dengue, Chikungunya and
Chandipura, etc. In 2008-09, there were 165 people died due to malaria, 21
people died due to dengue and 16 people died due to chandipura disease.
3.5.10 INFLUENZA A (H1N1) PANDAMIC (SWINE FLU)
With the time medical science has achieved a great success in control
and eradication of various endemic and pandemic chronic diseases. However,
with the changing situation diseases also changed, some new diseases raising
their heads in society, the H1N1 disease also being one of them. During 2009,
the State faced a serious problem due to Influenza A (H1N1) popularly known
as a Swine Flu. It is an air borne disease, which spreads rapidly in the
82
community through coughing and sneezing of positive patients. So far, about
4606 people have been found H1N1 positive, 224 people have died due to this
dangerous disease. Pune region was found to be the most affected area in the
state where 123 deaths occurred due to swine flu in till 2009. The State
Government accepted different measures to prevent spread of swine flu. The
measures taken by the State are as follow:
• Medical teams are deployed at air ports, railways stations, harbors and
bus stations to screen international passengers and domestic passengers
for influenza like illness.
• To isolate and treat suspected and affected cases, the Government has
started Identified Isolation Wards (IIWs) in every district. Private
hospitals have also been involved in this activity.
• Free facility of laboratory diagnosis of H1N1 is provided at National
Institute of virology, Pune and Haffkine Institute, Mumbai.
• 142 members ‘Rapid Response Team’ (RRT) have been trained to tackle
swine flu
• Sufficient quantity of Temiflu capsule, syrups, masks, hand sanitizers
are provided.
Up to the end of November 2009, 107 IIWs and 1501 screening centers are
available in the State, 0.79 lakh suspected cases have been given Temiflu.
Along with these health programs Jeevandayi Arogya Yojana (JAY)
providing financial assistance to BPL families for major surgeries of organs,
Navsanjivani Yojana to reduce maternal mortality and infant mortality in tribal
areas, Matrutva Anudan Yojana (MAY) to provide health services to pregnant
women, antenatal care (ANC) Registration, regular health check up and to
provide required medicine to women in tribal area have been implemented in
the State.
83
3.6 EXPENDITURE ON PUBLIC HEALTH OF
MAHARASHTRA STATE
There has been no standard definition of health care expenditure. It is a
well known fact that the health status of the people is influenced by a large
number of factors and is a function of medical care, income, education, sex,
marital status, and environmental pollution etc. Given too many factors
influencing health it becomes difficult to define what items constitute health
care spending and what truly reflects health care expenditure. However, expert
on health economics have explicitly mentioned that all that activities that
primarily and significantly contribute for improving health status of the people
should be included and others should be judged on their merit. (Berman
Peter,1994)
As we know medical and health comes under the State list. Under the
revenue expenditure head developmental expenditure of state government
incurred a huge amount on the social services. Expenditure on social services
includes the heads such as education, sports, cultural, expenditure on health and
family welfare, water supply, sanitation, information and broadcasting,
SCs/STs and OBCs welfare scheme, social welfare, nutrition, etc. An
expenditure on health and family welfare is one of the most significant
elements of expenditure on social services. In order to increase health status the
state government has spent a huge fund under the head of health and family
welfare. However, India’s social services were used relatively little by the poor.
The health of the poor has improved but not as a whole. Physical access to
health services has improved but inequalities exist because of biases in locating
facilities.11
Social services policies are not comprehensive enough and the quality of
services is low. The bureaucracy is inadequate to reach the poor. Existing
capacity and resources are inadequate, particularly for education and health.12
84
Table no. 3.1
Growth Profile of Expenditure of Maharashtra State on Public Health (Rs. in crore)
Year Total
Exp.
% of
10 to
2
Total
Rev.
Exp.
% of
10 to
4
Total
Dev.
Exp.
% of
10 to
6
Exp on
Social
Services
% of
10 to
8
Exp.
on
H&FW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1980-81 3094 5.24 1917 8.45 1435 11.29 678 23.89 162
1990-91 10773 4.43 8754 5.45 5616 8.49 3024 15.77 477
2000-01 48160 3.31 37401 4.26 22699 7.03 14351 11.11 1595
2001-02 54911 3.25 38281 4.66 20551 8.68 14137 12.62 1784
2002-03 61215 2.71 40474 4.09 22527 7.35 14228 11.64 1656
2003-04 70356 2.51 42680 4.14 22860 7.73 15990 11.06 1768
2004-05 76206 2.48 51047 3.7 28776 6.57 17549 10.78 1891
2005-06 72362 2.94 52280 4.06 30583 6.95 19917 10.66 2124
2006-07 78506 2.87 61385 3.67 36279 6.21 23559 9.57 2254
2007-08 82194 3.28 64780 4.16 40934 6.58 26773 10.07 2695
2008-09
RE 103461 3.05 78607 4.01 51620 6.11 32752 9.64 3156
2009-10
BE 122762 2.58 96184 3.29 61076 5.19 30255 10.47 3167
G.R.
(1980-81 to
1990-91)
3.4819 0.8454 4.5665 0.645 3.9136 0.752 4.4602 0.6601 2.9444
G.R. (1990-91 to
1900-2001) 4.47043 0.7471 4.2724 0.7816 4.04184 0.8280 4.7457 0.7045 3.3438
G.R. (2000-01 to
2009-10) 2.549 0.7795 2.5717 0.7723 2.6907 0.7383 2.1082 0.9424 1.9856
C.G.R. 9.256 -0.701 10.855 -2.135 12.741 -3.771 10.882 -2.152 8.4904
Note : C.G.R. is calculated for the year of 2000-01 to 2009-10.
Source : Economic Survey of Maharashtra of various years.
85
Observations
Table no. 3.1 shows the growth in expenditure on public health and
family welfare of Maharashtra State and its percentage to total expenditure,
total revenue expenditure, development expenditure and expenditure on social
services. The following things were found.
1. Expenditure on health and family welfare increased from 162 crore to
477 crore during 1980-81 to 1990-91 with the growth rate of 2.94, It
reached 1595 crore during 2000-01 with growth rate of 3.43. In 2008-
10 the expenditure on health and family welfare increased to 3067
crore with growth rate of 1.9. It means, in last 10 years the growth rate
of expenditure on health and family welfare had declined
2. The percentage of health and family welfare to total expenditure was
declined from 5.24 per cent in 1980-81 to 4.43 per cent 1990-91, 3.31
per cent in 2000-01 and 2.58 per cent in 2008-09.
3. The percentage of health and family welfare to total revenue expenditure
declined from 8.45 per cent in 1980-81 to 5.45 per cent 1990-91, 4.26
per cent in 2000-01 and 3.29 per cent in 2008-09.
4. The percentage of health and family welfare to developmental
expenditure declined from 11.29 per cent in 1980-81 to 8.49 per cent
1990-91, 7.03 per cent in 2000-01 and 5.29 per cent in 2008-09.
5. The percentage of health and family welfare to developmental
expenditure declined from 23.89 per cent in 1980-81 to 15.77 per cent
1990-91, 11.11 per cent in 2000-01 and 10.47 per cent in 2008-09.
Revenue expenditure on health as a share of total government
expenditure shows a declining trend reflecting the inadequate commitment of
the state towards increasing health care demands of the population. This shows
that the amount of health and family welfare was diverted somewhere else.
86
3.7 PANCHAYAT RAJ INSTITUTIONS AND PUBLIC HEALTH
The local health department is that agency through which government
delivers adequate health service to the community.13
Maharashtra has a well
functioning Panchayat Raj System since last five decades with administrative
and financial powers delegated to these institutions. The state has a three-tier
structure of PRI. Zila Parishad is the District level body having subject-based
committees. The administrator at ZP level is Chief Executive Officer (IAS),
while the Collector handles law and Revenue departments. Hence the CEO is
the District Development Officer for the District. in the State of Maharashtra
and hence he/she is also the Chairperson of the District Integrated Health and
Family Welfare Society.
All the development programs are run through Zila Parishad. Panchayat
Samiti (PS) and Gram Panchayats PRI structure at block level and village level
respectively. The personnel working at various levels are required to interact
with the PRI members. Dist. Health Officer who is at par with Chief Medical
Officer (Health) works under the control of Zila Parishad. Taluka Health
Officers (THO) and Medical Officer (MO) PHC work in liaison with PS and
sub-center staff works in liaison with the GP. The Zila Parishad is fully
involved in planning, implementation and review of all health programs
including RCH, which are implemented on agency basis through Zila
Parishads. The PRI members at district level (Zila Parishad), block level
(Panchayat Samiti) and village level (Village Panchayat) are regularly oriented
and involved in various health initiatives. They play an active role in
community level activities for motivating the villagers and stakeholders in
CNA, demand generation and monitoring the functioning of various health
programs.
State has developed a training module for members of Panchayat Raj
Institutions on various issues under NRHM with the help of UNFPA and State
Rural Development institute (Subsidiary of YASHADA) the state run
Development Administration Academy. The 3 day module has been finalized
& the actual training/ sensitization of PRI members are being conducted in all
87
districts of the state. The state has also set up village health committees to
monitor the health issues and liaison with the health institutions.
3.8 EXPENDITURE OF ZILLA PARISHADS ON PUBLIC
HEALTH
The Zila Parishad is the agency of rural local self government at the
district level. The rural primary health services mainly PHCs and Sub-PHCs
are working under administrative control of Zila Parishad. It means Zila
Parishad is responsible for the health status of the rural mass at district level.
To establish and provide management of hospitals, dispensaries and planning
health centers are the functions of Zila Parishad government related to health of
the people residing in rural area. The Zila Parishad incurred the expenditure on
health under the head of Public Health.
Table 3.2 shows that, the expenditure of Zila Parishad made by
government on public health was increased from 98.58 crore in 1990-91 to
747.45 crore in 2006-07 with the growth rate of 6.12. However its percentage
to total revenue expenditure was not so much changed. In fact C.G.R. shows
the decreasing percentage of health expenditure to total revenue expenditure
during the period of 1990-91 to 2006-07. It was also observed that Rural Per
capita public health expenditure was very low and it increased from 17.67 to
144 during the same period with the growth rate of 17.67 per cent. It short,
considering the overall period the expenditure of Zila Parishad on public health
has decreased.
88
Table no. 3.2
Growth Profile of Expenditure of Zila Parishads on Public Health
(1990-91 to 2006-07)
Year Total Revenue
Expenditure
(in Cr.)
Medical &
Health
Services
(in Cr.)
% of 3 to 2 Rural Per capita
exp. on health by
ZP govt.
(census 2001)
(in Rs.)
1 2 3 4 5
1990-91 1180.14 98.58 8.35 17.67
1991-92 1274.93 116.24 9.12 20.84
1992-93 1731.01 135.10 7.80 24.22
1993-94 2022.62 160.18 7.92 28.72
1994-95 2310.33 163.94 7.10 29.39
1995-96 2828.61 216.10 7.64 38.74
1996-97 3358.57 264.65 7.88 47.45
1997-98 3784.34 279.84 7.39 50.17
1998-99 4150.28 312.75 7.54 56.07
1999-00 4783.51 328.29 6.86 58.86
2000-01 5337.42 372.42 6.98 66.77
2001-02 5841.07 387.04 6.63 69.39
2002-03 5952.48 402.63 6.76 72.18
2003-04 6124.04 424.83 6.94 76.16
2004-05 6742.33 487.16 7.23 87.34
2005-06 7141.26 622.48 8.72 111.6
2006-07 8161.52 747.45 9.16 134
G.R. 6.92 7.58 1.10 17.67
C.G.R. 12.5813 12.1297 -0.3981 12.12
Source : Economics Survey of Maharashtra
89
3.9 EXPENDITURE OF GRAM PANCHAYATS ON HEALTH
AND SANITATION
The Gram Panchayat is a village level local body and village is divided
into wards. The cleanliness, sanitation, safe water supply, information to PHC
about natural calamities and including epidemic, etc. are health related
functions of Gram Panchayats. Gram Panchayats in Maharashtra State incurred
expenditure on health and sanitation as shown below :
Table 3.3 indicates that, the expenditure of Gram Panchayats on health
and sanitation was increased from 16.34 crore in 1990-91 to 241.21 crore in
2006-07 with the growth rate of 14.76. However its percentage to total revenue
expenditure was not much changed. The compound growth rate (1.0103 per
cent) shows the fluctuations in the percentage of expenditure on health and
sanitation to total expenditure incurred by Gram Panchayats.
3.10 MISMANAGEMENT OF BUDGETARY PROVISION
The Maharashtra State is considered as a progressive State in India. But
in the case of health subject we can see an extreme mismanagement in
budgetary provision in the same State. The huge amount has been demanded
every year on account of public health but actually State is unable to spend
provisional amount which is average 60-70 per cent of the estimated budget 1.
This revelation can be distressing for the State. The outcome budget of the
Ministry of Health released from time to time showed that the State did not
spend whooping amount out of their allocation. The non-utilisation of almost
one third of the total allocation for different health programmes poses a serious
question on the State willingness and capability to distribute the resources
provided for the health of people.
90
Table no. 3.3
Expenditure of Gram Panchayats for the years 1990-91 to 2006-07
Year Total
Expenditure
( in Cr.)
Health and
Sanitation
( in Cr.)
% of
3 to 2
1 2 3 4
1990-91 80.47 16.34 20.31
1991-92 88.06 18.74 21.28
1992-93 100.60 24.27 24.13
1993-94 123.79 30.40 24.56
1994-95 135.81 33.19 24.44
1995-96 156.85 38.31 24.42
1996-97 223.73 69.16 30.91
1997-98 296.38 94.09 31.75
1998-99 352.43 127.91 36.29
1999-00 380.33 125.47 32.99
2000-01 399.31 107.26 26.86
2001-02 529.36 146.06 27.59
2002-03 544.39 148.18 27.22
2003-04 662.47 166.58 25.15
2004-05 758.44 192.34 25.36
2005-06 832.23 211.67 25.43
2006-07 938.58 241.21 25.70
G.R. 11.66 14.76 1.27
C.G.R. 17.7004 18.8905 1.0103
Source : i) Economic Survey of Maharashtra
91
Table no. 3.4
Budget of Public Health Department of Maharashtra State 2002-03 to
2006-07
(Rs. in crore)
Year Estimated
budget for
public
health
Provision for
on public
health
% of
3 to 2
Actual
Expenditure
on public
health
% of 5
to 3
1 2 3 4 5 6
2002-03 616 327 53.08 209 63.91
2003-04 698 477 68.34 303 63.52
2004-05 511 374 73.19 288 77.01
2005-06 769 401 53.15 305 76.06
2006-07 820 418 50.98 277 66.27
Average 59.54 69.35
Source : Economics Survey of Maharashtra (various years)
Table no. 3.4 indicates that, during 2002-03 State Government had
somehow managed to spend 209 (63.91 %) crore out of 327 crores of allocation.
After some ups and downs during 2006-07 State Government had spent 277
(66.27) crores on public health out of total allocation of 418 crores. The State
Government has failed in spending the allocated amount. An average spending
on public health is less than 70 per cent of its allocated budget during year of
2002-03 to 2006-07. Outcome budget did not mention the reasons behind such
huge unspent money on ongoing health programmes but it is understood that
lack of will on the part of State Government, bureaucratic red tapism, non-
recruited officers or staff and corruption were the major factors.
92
3.11 INFRASTRUCTURE OF RURAL PUBLIC HEALTH
SERVICES IN MAHARASHTRA
Generally, the health status of the people depends on the easy
availability of the health care services. Therefore, the availability of basic
health facilities is considered as an important determinant of health status.
3.11.1 DISTRICTWISE NUMBER OF SUB-PHC, PHC AND CHC IN
MAHARASHTRA
Availability of public health care services is essential to know the health
status of people of the particular state. In the health care sector, we can see the
disparity in spread of rural public health care services across the Maharashtra
State. The table no. 3.5 indicates the district wise number of public health
centers in Maharashtra State. The table also shows inter district disparity in
number of public heath centers. Nashik District has the highest number of Sub-
PHCs (577), PHCs (106) and CHCs (26). On the other side, Hingoli District
has the lowest in number of Sub-PHCs (132), PHCs (24) and CHCs (5) in the
Maharashtra State. The table also indicates that, Vidarbha and Marathwada
have less number of public health centers compared to western maharashtra.
The average number public health center is Sub-PHCs (320), PHCs (55) and
CHCs (12). However, the district such as Akola, Aurangabad, Bhandara, Beed,
Buldhana, Dhule, Godiya, Hingoli, Jalana, Latur, Nandurbar, Parbhani, Raigarh,
Sindhudurga, Wardha and Washim are having a less number of Sub-PHC, PHC
and CHC/RH than average number.
93
Table no. 3.5
District wise Number of Sub-PHC, PHC and CHC in Maharashtra State
Sr. no. District No. of
Sub-PHC
No. of
PHC
No. of
RH/CHC
1 Ahmadnagar 555 96 21
2 Akola 178 30 6
3 Amravati 333 56 13
4 Aurangabad 279 50 8
5 Bhandara 193 33 8
6 Beed 280 50 13
7 Buldana 280 52 14
8 Chandrapur 339 58 13
9 Dhule 232 41 7
10 Gadchiroli 376 45 12
11 Gondiya 237 39 10
12 Hingoli 132 24 5
13 Jalgaon 442 77 20
14 Jalna 213 39 9
15 Kolhapur 413 72 17
16 Latur 252 46 11
17 Nagpur 316 49 11
18 Nanded 377 64 14
19 Nandurbar 290 58 12
20 Nashik 577 106 26
21 Osmanabad 206 42 8
22 Parbhani 214 31 8
23 Pune 539 96 23
24 Raigarh 288 55 13
25 Ratnagiri 378 67 10
26 Sangli 320 59 11
27 Satara 400 71 14
28 Sindhudurg 248 38 10
29 Solapur 431 77 13
30 Thane 492 79 14
31 Wardha 181 27 8
32 Washim 153 25 8
33 Yavatmal 435 63 17
Maximum 577 106 26
Minimum 132 24 5
Average 320.58 55 12.333
S.D. 118.63 21.026 4.871
C.V. 0.370 0.382 0.395
Source : Directorate of Health Services, Government of Maharashtra, Pune.
94
3.12 INDICATORS OF HEALTH IN MAHARASHTRA STATE
The health status of the people is determined by numerous factors such
as per capital income, way of life, housing, sanitation, water supply, nutrition,
education, geography, climate, etc. However, the State Government
expenditure on public health and existing health infrastructure are the most
influential aspects of health status of the people. In other words, Health
indicators are the outcome of State Government’s expenditure on public health
and wide spread of public health care system in the state.
Up to now, we have studied the State Government’s and Local
Government’s expenditure on public health and State wide infrastructure of
health care services. Now it is time to find relation between Government health
expenditure and health indicators. Health has to be defined from a practical
point of view and, therefore, it has been defined according to life expectancy,
infant mortality, and crude death rate, etc.14
Basic indicators of health like birth
rate, death rate, infant mortality rate, total fertility rate as well as life
expectancy give broad picture of health status of a State. They can be used for
assessing specific health care needs and also for evaluating quality of health
services and programs.
In the present study health status is examined by the movement of health
indicators. Table no. 3.6 shows that, birth rate in rural area of Maharashtra
State was declined from 28.0 in 1991 to 18.1 in 2009 while total birth rate of
Maharashtra State also reduced from 26.2 to 17.6 in the same period. It shows
the birth in rural area is still higher compare to total birth rate; the total birth
rate consists of rural and urban birth rate. Decrease in birth rate shows the
people’s awareness regarding the benefits of small family. The decline in birth
rate which is a positive signal of health has been attributed to national family
planning program, which is implemented through the network of public health
care services.
95
Table no. 3.6
Selected Health Indicators in Maharashtra State
(1991-2008)
Year Birth Rate Death Rate Infant
Mortality
Rate
Total
Fertility
Rate
Life
Expectancy at
Birth (years)
Rural Total Rural Total Rural Total Rural Total Total
1991 28.0 26.2 9.8 8.2 69 60 3.4 3.0 64.80
1992 27.4 25.3 9.1 7.9 67 59 N.A. N.A. 64.80
1993 27.1 25.2 9.3 7.3 63 50 N.A. N.A. 64.80
1994 26.9 25.1 9.2 7.5 68 55 N.A. N.A. 64.80
1995 26 24.5 8.9 7.5 66 55 N.A. N.A. 64.80
1996 24.9 23.4 8.7 7.4 58 48 3.2 2.6 65.35
1997 24.4 23.1 8.6 7.3 56 47 N.A. N.A. 65.35
1998 23.6 22.5 8.9 7.7 58 49 N.A. N.A. 65.35
1999 21.6 21.1 8.7 7.5 58 48 N.A. N.A. 65.35
2000 21.4 21 8.6 7.5 56 48 N.A. N.A. 65.35
2001 21.1 20.7 8.5 7.5 55 45 2.6 2.1 69.63
2002 20.6 20.3 8.3 7.3 52 45 2.5 2.3 69.63
2003 20.1 19.9 8.2 7.2 48 42 2.4 2.3 69.63
2004 19.9 19.1 6.8 6.2 42 36 2.4 2.2 69.63
2005 19.6 19.0 7.4 6.7 41 36 2.4 2.2 69.63
2006 19.2 18.5 7.4 6.7 42 35 2.3 2.1 69.63
2007 18.7 18.1 7.3 6.6 41 34 2.2 2.0 69.63
2008 18.4 17.9 7.4 6.6 40 33 2.1 2.0 69.63
2009 18.1 17.6 7.6 6.7 37 31 2.1 2.0 70.5
Source : Economic Survey of Maharashtra 2008-09
96
Death rate has considerably declined from 9.8 in rural area and 8.2 in
overall Maharashtra in 1991 to 7.4 in rural area and 6.7 in overall Maharashtra
in 2009. It has been attributed to mass control of diseases and advance in
medical science, better health facilities and impact of national health programs.
Infant mortality rate is one of the most universally accepted indicator of
health status not only of infants, but also of whole population and the socio-
economic condition where they live. According to table, it has declined from
69 in rural area and 60 in overall Maharashtra in 1991 to 40 and 31 respectively
in 2009.
Total fertility rate represents the average of children a woman would
have if she were to pass through her reproductive years bearing children at the
same rates as the women now in each age group.15
It is selected as a health
indicator because every childbirth influences the health of woman, and frequent
pregnancies can deteriorate the health of women. According to the table total
fertility rate in rural area declined from 3.4 in rural area and 3.0 overall
Maharashtra in 1991 to 2.2 and 2.0 in 2009, which will be helpful for the
improvement of health of women.
Life expectancy is a good indicator of health status of people in the
state. As an indicator of long term survival, it can be considered as a positive
health indicator. The trend in life expectancy shows that, people are living
longer, and they have a right to a life in a good health. The present life
expectancy of people in the State is 70.5 years, which was 64.80 years in 1991.
Demographer opined that further increase in life expectancy may be continuing
in future.
3.13 RURAL HEALTH SERVICES AND NIGATIVE ATTITUDE
OF MAHARASHTRA GOVERNMENT
Even though, Maharashtra has been at the forefront of the health care
development in India and one of the first States to achieve the norms mandated
for PHC, Sub- PHC and RH, the real picture of rural public health services
97
shows the dismal of state government. The government has concealed their
lacunas in the parade. Here, the researcher has made an attempt to bring
forward these lacunas. It will catch the attention of the government and the
State will make endeavour to remove these lacunas. It will be helpful to place
Maharashtra in the forefront of parade of health care development in real
meaning.
3.13.1 SHORTFALL OF MANPOWER
Shortfall of manpower is the most distressing difficulty before rural
public health services. The detail information about shortfall of manpower at
the each level health centre is discussed in this part of study.
3.13.1.2 SHORTFALL OF MANPOWER AT SUB-PHC
MAHARASHTRA STATE
Sub-primary health center is first contact point between the patient and
public health care system. And the problem of lack of manpower also begins
from the grass root level. The shortfall of the manpower at sub center level is
given bellow:
Table no. 3.7
Shortfall of Manpower at Sub-PHC Maharashtra State
(As on March 2008)
Name of the
post
Required Sanct-
ioned
In
Position
Vacant Shortfall
R S P S-P R-P
HW(F)/ANM 12395 12645 12027 618 368
HW(M)/MPW 10579 12210 9956 2254 623 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
Table no. 3.8
Shortfall of Manpower at Sub Centre in
Trabal Area of Maharashtra State
(As on March 2008)
Name of the
post
Required Sanct-
ioned
In
Position
Vacant Shortfall
R S P S-P R-P
HW(F)/ANM 2075 2025 1536 489 539
HW(M)/MPW 2075 2025 1006 1019 1069 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
98
Table no. 3.7 and 3.8 indicate that, sub-PHCs in rural area are facing the
problem of short fall of 368 female health workers and 1069 male health
worker who are backbone of the concerned system. On the other hand Sub-
PHCs in tribal area need 539 female health worker and 1069 male health
workers.
3.13.1.2 SHORTFALL OF MANPOWER AT PHC OF
MAHARASHTRA STATE
Primary health centers are working at the second stage in rural public
health system. It is the first referral unit for sub-PHC. The shortfall of man
power at this secondary stage is as follow :
Table no. 3.9
Shortfall of Manpower at PHC of Maharashtra State
(As on March 2008)
Name of the
post
Required Sanct-
ioned
In
Position
Vacant Shortfall
R S P S-P R-P
Doctors 1816 1800 1191 609 625
HA (F)/LHV 1816 3740 3323 417 1399
HA (M) 1816 4598 3182 1416 400 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
Table no. 3.10
Shortfall of Manpower at PHC in Tribal Area of Maharashtra State
(As on March 2008)
Name of the
Post
Required Sanct-
ioned
In
Position
Vacant Shortfall
R S P S-P R-P
Doctors 320 316 280 36 40
HA (F)/LHV 320 316 316 0 4
HA (M) 320 316 241 75 79 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
Table no. 3.9 and 3.10 show that, shows that in case of rural area, there
was a shortfall of 625, 1399 and 400 for the post of doctor, female health
assistant and male health assistant respectively in PHC. In case of tribal area
there is a shortfall of 40, 04 and 79 for the same posts in Maharashtra State.
99
3.13.1.3 SHORTFALL OF MANPOWER AT CHC OR RH IN
MAHARASHTRA STATE
Rural hospitals or community health centers are the first referral unit for
the PHC and second referral unit for the Sub-PHC. It is mostly working as a
curative unit. It is the most significant and upper level part of rural public
health care services.
Table no. 3.11
Shortfall of Manpower at RH in Maharashtra State (As on March 2008)
Name of the post Required Sanct-
ioned
In
Position
Vacant Shortfall
R S P S-P R-P
Surgeon 407 53 69 * 338
Obstetricians &
Gynaecologists
407 133 143 * 264
Physicians 407 59 41 18 366
Paediatricians 407 69 99 * 308
Total Specialists 1628 314 352 * 1276
Radiographer 407 407 294 113 133 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
Table no. 3.12
Shortfall of Manpower at RH in Tribal Areas of Maharashtra State
(As on March 2008)
Name of the Post Required Sanct-
ioned
In
Position
Vacant Shortfall
R S P S-P R-P
Surgeon 69 71 17 54 50
Obstetricians &
Gynaecologists
67 71 28 43 39
Physicians 67 71 7 64 60
Paediatricians 67 71 23 48 44
Total Specialists 268 284 75 209 193
Radiographer 67 71 52 19 15 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
Table no. 3.11 and 3.12 show that, though rural hospitals are a vital link
of rural public health care chain, yet there is shortfall of health specialist like
surgeons, obstetricians and gynaecologists, physicians and paediatricians.
These are indispensable aspects of the rural hospitals. If these specialists are
not available in the hospital then no patients come to the rural hospitals for cure
100
of their disease. Nevertheless, total 407 rural hospitals in the state have
shortfall of 338 surgeons, 264 obstetricians and gynaecologists, 366 physicians
and 308 paediatricians. On the other hand rural hospitals in tribal area have a
shortfall of 50 surgeons, 39 obstetricians and gynaecologists, 60 physicians and
44 paediatricians. In short, most of the rural hospitals are functioning without
the specialists.
1.13.1.4 SHORTFALL OF PHARMACISTS, LABORATORY
TECHNICIANS AND NURSE MIDWIFE/STAFF NURSE
AT PHC AND RH OR CHC IN MAHARASHTRA STATE
Pharmacist’s and laboratory technician’s posts are as important as
doctors and paramedical staff. The shortfall of these posts at PHC and RH is
given bellow:
Table no. 3.13
Shortfall of Pharmacists, Laboratory Technicians and Nurse
Midwife/Staff Nurse at PHC and RH in Maharashtra State
(As on March 2008)
Name of the
post
Required Sanctioned In
Position
Vacant Shortfall
R S P S-P R-P
Pharmacists 2223 2367 1976 391 247
Laboratory
Technicians
2223 803 769 34 1454
Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
Table no. 3.14
Shortfall of Pharmacists, Laboratory Technicians and Nurse
Midwife/Staff Nurse IN Tribal Area of Maharashtra State
(As on March, 2008)
Name of the
post
Required Sanctioned In position Vacant Shortfall
(R) S P S-P R-P
Pharmacists 387 387 322 65 65
Lab
technicians
387 387 356 31 31
Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
101
Table no. 3.13 and 3.14 show the shortfall of 247 pharmacists and 1454
lab technicians in rural area and 65 pharmacists and 31 lab technicians in tribal
area of Maharashtra State. It means that considering the requirement of
manpower the State Government has sanctioned the posts, but most of the posts
in the rural public health centers are still vacant. Hence, rural public health
system suffered the problem of shortfall of staff in one hand and excess burden
on available staff on the other.
3.13.2 BUILDING POSITION OF RURAL PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM
Establishment of building facilities of health center is one of the basic
requirements for health care delivery. Building of health care center is a one
time but a huge investment for the government. Therefore in the initial phase of
public health care services, it was not possible to the government for afford
such huge investment for establishment of building for every health center at
once. Hence, it was decided that, the building would be hired, rental or rental
free voluntary basis from Gram Panchayat building or private owner. With the
time, government made provision for building fund and buildings were built for
the health centers. At present most of the health centers are functioning in their
own buildings but a few are still functioning in the rental building.
Table no. 3.15
Position of Buildings for Sub-PHC, PHC and RH/CHC
in Maharashtra State (As on March 2008) Name of health
center
No. of
health
center
no. of sub-centers functioning
in
Building
under
counstr-
uction
Building
required
to be
constructed Govt
Build
Rented
Building
Rent free
Panchayat/
vol. soci.
Buildings
Sub-PHC 10579 7442 867 2270 650 2487
PHC 1816 1518 10 288 137 161
RH/CHC 407 297 4 106 38 72 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
102
Table no. 3.16
Position of Buildings for Sub-PHC, PHC and RH/CHC
in Tribal Areas of Maharashtra (As on March 2008) Name of health
center
No. of
health
center
No. of sub-centers functioning
in
Building
under
counstr-
uction
Building
required
to be
constructed Govt
Build
Rented
Building
Rent free
Panchayat/
vol. soci.
Buildings
Sub-PHC 2075 1611 152 312 162 302
PHC 320 246 5 69 39 35
RH/CHC 67 44 2 21 7 16 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
Table no. 3.15 and 3.16 shows that, in rural and tribal area there are
1654 Sub-PHCs, 2136 PHCs and 474 RHs functioning in their own building in
2008. 449 Sub-PHCs, 372 PHCs and 133 RHs were functioning in rented or
rent free volunteer social building. 812 Sub-PHCs, 176 PHCs and 45 RHs
buildings were under construction. Yet there was a requirement of additional
buildings of 2789 Sub-PHCs, 196 PHCs and 88 RHs to be constructed.
3.13.3 FACILITIES AVAILABLE AT SUB-CENTRES IN
MAHARASHTRA STATE
Supply of sufficient and clean water and continuous supply of electricity
are the basic needs of any health centers. Water is essential for drinking, bath,
washing clothes, and clean environment. On the other hand electricity is used
for light in the health center, electronic medical equipments, medicinal
refrigerator etc. Quarters for the staff are also an essential requirement of the
staff working in rural public health center.
Table no. 3.17
Facilities Available at Sub-Centers in Maharashtra State
(As on March 2008)
No. of existing
Sub-PHC
No. of Sub-PHC
with ANM
Quarters
Without
Regular Water
supply
Without Electric
Supply
Number % Number % Number %
10579
7442
70.3
5349
50.6
4812
45.5
Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
103
Residence quarters, water supply and electricity these are the basic
needs of each health center; still 29.7 per cent PHCs are without ANM quarters,
49.4 per cent sub-PHCs are without regular water supply and 54.5 without
electric supply in the Maharashtra State.
Table no. 3.18
Facilities at PHCs in Maharashtra State (Total PHCs 1816)
(As on March, 2008)
Facilities No. of
PHCs
% to total PHC
With Labour room 1498 82.5
With Operation Theatre 1516 83.5
With 4-6 Beds 1518 83.6
Without Electric supply 182 10.0
Without regular water supply 509 28.0
With telephone 980 54.0
With computer 535 29.5 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
Table no. 3.18 shows the availability of necessary facilities at PHC. In
2008, out of total PHCs in the state 17.5 per cent PHCs had no labour room,
16.5 per cent PHCs had no operation theatre, 16.4 per cent PHCs were facing
the problem of inadequate beds, 10 per cent PHC had no electricity, 28 per cent
PHCs had no regular water, 46 per cent PHCs are without telephone facility
and 75.5 per cent PHCs have no computer facility.
In such a situation, we can not say that the state has been at forefront of
health care development in the country.
3.13.4 AREA, DISTANCE AND VILLAGES COVERE BY RURAL
PUBLIC HEALH CENTER
The average area, average radial distance and average number of
villages covered by rural public health care centers are as follows :
Table no. 3.19
Average Rural Area, Average Radial Distance and Average Number of
Villages covered by Primary Health Care Institutions (As on march, 2008)
Covering aspects Sub-PHC PHC RH/CHC
Average Rural Area (Sq. Km.) 28.39 165.39 737.98
Average Radial Distance (Kms) 3.01 7.25 15.32
Average no. of villages 4 24 107 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008
104
Table no. 3.19 depicted that, Sub-PHC, PHC and RH covers average
28.39 sq. km., 165.39 sq. km. and 737.98 sq.km. area of Maharashtra State.
The average radial distance for sub-PHC is 3 kms, PHC 7.25 kms and RH
15.35 kms. However, each sub-PHC carries average 4 villages, PHC 24
villages and RH 107, which is actually more that their norms.
All this tends to suggest that not only there is an acute shortage of
medical specialists, but there is also a mis-match of facilities and specialists in
a majority of public health centers, implying sub-optimal utilization and thin
spread of available resources.
3.14 CONCLUSION
This chapter concludes that, though Maharashtra State has progressed
well in many of the health indicators, its achievement is worse when compared
to State like Kerala. Within the State there are inter-district and intra-district
variations in health indicators. There is vast discrepancy in the spread of health
services among the districts of Maharashtra State. It is necessary to emphasis
on the increase in infrastructure in rural area. The local governments i.e. Zila
Parishad and Gram Panchayat seem to be indifferent to health expenditure and
health status of the people in rural area. State Government seems to be lethargic
in optimum use of funds and unable to expend the fund allocated in budget for
public health sector. The rural public health services are facing the problem of
inadequate manpower e.g. doctors, paramedical staff and other staff and it has
direct influence on the utilisation of rural public health centers by the rural
people. The private and corporate health services are not affordable for poor
and downtrodden rural mass. Hence, the government should take steps to
reduce this shortfall of manpower as well as emphasis on increase in health
investment in rural area. As there are number graduates and post graduate and
105
qualified doctors and nurses available in the state, they may be employed at the
shortfall posts. If government gives satisfactory salary and service rules, no
doubt the young health workers will join the services. But government is
shifting its responsibility to NGO and to private sector, but it is not desirable.
The constitutional provisions regarding health services seem to be forgotten by
the State Government.
106
R E F E R E N C E S
1. Bishop E. L., ‘Responsibility of Government in Public Health Work’
American Journal of Public Health, Vol. X No. 6, Nashville, Tenn, June 1928.
2. Government of India (2006), Annual Report 2005-06, Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare, New Delhi, 2006.
3. Bishop E. L., ‘Responsibility of Government in Public Health Work’
American Journal of Public Health, Vol. X No. 6, Nashville, Tenn, June 1928.
4. Economic Survey of Maharashtra, Directorate of Economics and Statistics,
Planning Department, Annual Report, Mumbai, 2009-10.
5. Park K., Preventative And Social Medicine, M/s Banarasidas Bhanot,
Jabalpur, 2009.
6. Economic Survey of Maharashtra, Directorate of Economics and Statistics,
Planning Department, Annual Report, Mumbai, 2009-10.
7. Park K., Preventative and Social Medicine, M/s Banarasidas Bhanot,
Jabalpur, P- 379, 2009.
8. Economic Survey of Maharashtra Directorate of Economics and Statistics,
Planning Department, Annual Report, Mumbai, 2009-10.
9. Ibid
10. Swarnkar Keshav, Community Health Nursing, N. R. Brothers, Indore, 2007,
PP- 614-615.
11. Rout R.P. H. S. and Panda P. K., Health Economics in India, New Century
Publications, New Delhi, 2007, P- 10.
12. Murthy, Hirway, Panchmukhi P., and Satia, ‘How well do India’s Social
Service Programmes seve the poor?’, World Bank Policy Research Working
Paper WPS 491, World Bank, New Delhi, 1990.
13. Bishop E. L., ‘Responsibility of Government in Public Health Work’
American Journal of Public Health, Vol. X No. 6, Nashville, Tenn, June
1928.
14. Reddy K. N., Health Expenditure in India, Working Paper No. 14, NIPFP,
New Delhi, 1992.
15. The John Hopkins University, Population Report, M-8, Sept.-Oct. 85,
Baltimore, Maryland, 1965.