+ All Categories
Home > Documents > HEALTH PLANNING IN MAHARASHTRA...

HEALTH PLANNING IN MAHARASHTRA...

Date post: 12-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: lydat
View: 220 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
36
CHAPTER - III HEALTH PLANNING IN MAHARASHTRA STATE 3.1 INTORDUCTION Located in the north centre of peninsula of India, with the command of Arabian Sea, Marathi speaker occupied, ranking in second position in case of population (census 2001) and ranking in third position in case of area Maharashtra is the leading state of the Indian Republic. According to census 2001, Maharashtra population was 9.69 crore, the percentage of urban population in the State was 42.6 and Maharashtra was second most urbanised state after Tamil Nadu. At the same time out total of the population, 57.6 per cent people were residing in 43722 villages. The present chapter deals with the constitutional provision of public health expenditure, health infrastructure in the state and its impact on health indicators especially with the reference of rural area of Maharashtra State. 3.2 PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM AT STATE GOVERNMENT LEVEL A State Health Department, being one degree nearer the individual citizen, has greater authority than any other jurisdiction and a more intimate relation to local health departments that the Central government. 1 According to Constitution of India health is the subject of the state government. The Directive Principles of the Indian Constitution enunciate that, “the state shall regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties”
Transcript

CHAPTER - III

HEALTH PLANNING IN

MAHARASHTRA STATE

3.1 INTORDUCTION

Located in the north centre of peninsula of India, with the command of

Arabian Sea, Marathi speaker occupied, ranking in second position in case of

population (census 2001) and ranking in third position in case of area

Maharashtra is the leading state of the Indian Republic. According to census

2001, Maharashtra population was 9.69 crore, the percentage of urban

population in the State was 42.6 and Maharashtra was second most urbanised

state after Tamil Nadu. At the same time out total of the population, 57.6 per

cent people were residing in 43722 villages.

The present chapter deals with the constitutional provision of public

health expenditure, health infrastructure in the state and its impact on health

indicators especially with the reference of rural area of Maharashtra State.

3.2 PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM AT STATE GOVERNMENT

LEVEL

A State Health Department, being one degree nearer the individual

citizen, has greater authority than any other jurisdiction and a more intimate

relation to local health departments that the Central government. 1According to

Constitution of India health is the subject of the state government. The

Directive Principles of the Indian Constitution enunciate that, “the state shall

regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its

people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties”

72

(Article 47). After the making health policy for health by central government, it

is the responsibility of the state government to execute the policy. In this

direction the implementation, surveillance and providing technical assistance at

local level are functions to be accomplished by the state governments. To

provide medical services and public health facilities to the people are the main

functions of the state governments, in it includes the Hospitals, pharmaceuticals

and similar services. Due to decentralisation of democracy, Zila Parishad

provides all kinds of health services to the rural area, while in the urban area it

is the responsibility of Municipal Corporation. For the convenience of study

the public health scheme is divided into two parts, 1. Environmental Health

Services and 2. Personal Health services. The local government performs these

functions on behalf of state governments.

1. Environmental Health Services

In order to control and eradicate epidemics and other diseases, sanitation

services played a vital role. The state government did not perform this kind of

work directly, however, the local governments have to accomplish this work.

Environmental Health Services include the services such as public sanitation

services. The state government provides medical and health, guidance and

surveillance related, help to all local governments.

2. Personal Health Services

The purpose of environmental health is to bring about conditions that

will promote health and prevent diseases. The concept of environment includes

water supply, disposal of wastes, and housing, personal hygiene and disease

control. Personal health services refer to the health services where people

benefited individually by the health services. It includes the Maternal and Child

Health Services, School Health Programmes, etc. At the same time it includes

the hospitals, doctors, nurses and paramedical staff who treat the patients. In

case of rural area the state government deputed the functions like

environmental health services to the Village Panchyat, while the personal

health services were deputed to the Zila Parishad.

73

3.3 HEALTH ADMINISTRATION IN THE

MAHARASHTRA STATE

In all States, the management sector comprises of the State Ministry of

Health and A Director of Health. The State Health Ministry is headed by the

Minister of Health and Family Welfare who is elected by the people. The

Health Secretary is usually a senior I.A.S. Officer. The Health Ministry deals

mainly with administration, and policy decisions, approval of plans, finance

and Budget. The Health Directorate is headed by the Directorate of Health

Services. He is the chief technical adviser to the State Government on health

matters. The Director of Health Services has several assistants who are MCH,

Family Welfare, Nutrition, Communicable Diseases and Health Education.

Functions of the State Health Director

The functions of the State Health Director are given below:

1. Formulating the plan for health services, directing the approved health

programmes and evaluating them.

2. Rendering preventive services and curative health services

3. Supervision of PHCs through the organisation of District Health Services

4. Control of milk and food sanitation and adulteration

5. Execution of central government health programmes e.g. MCH and Family

Welfare

6. Recruitment of personnel for rural health services

7. Training of P.H. Nurses, Sanitarians, Health Assistants and Health Workers,

(former ANMs).

8. Promotion of health education and nutrition programmes

9. Collection of vital statistics

10. Co-ordination of health with other Ministries of the State, with the Central

Health Ministry and with voluntary agencies.

74

3.4 HEALTH ORGANISATION

Medical Services in Maharashtra States was organised in the beginning

of the 19th

century. The year 1942 was considered an important landmark

regarding more recent origin of Health Services. Till recently the Medical and

Public Health Department were functioning independently of each other at the

State, Divisional and District levels. The Medical Department was under the

Surgeon General and the Public health Department worked under the Director

of Public Health.

The Medical Department looked after curative medical care as well as

Medical Education including training of medical and para-medical medical

personnel and the Public Health Department was in-charge of preventive health

services and family planning. Thus the responsibility for Medical Care and

Education on the one hand and that for Medical Care in rural areas, control of

communicable diseases, maternal and child health education on the other, was

clearly divided into two separate and independent compartments. To achieve

proper coordination in total health care and to avoid duplication of efforts and

overlapping of work an integration of these two services became necessary.

Government took steps in this direction and from 1970,1 the post of Director of

Public Health was abolished and the post of Director of Health Services was

created with Headquarters at Bombay to control both Medical and Public

Health Services in the State excluding Medical Education and Research.

Similarly the post of ‘Surgeon General’ was abolished and instead the post of

Director of Medical Education and Research was created.

The Director of Health Services is assisted by five Joint Directors of

Health Services, two being stationed at Bombay and the other three at Pune.

Out of the three Joint Directors at Pune one looks exclusively after Family

Planning, Maternal and Child Health and School health work. Further, the

Deputy Directors of Medical Services and Deputy Directors of Public Health

Services were changed to Deputy Directors of Health Services (Bombay).

Besides the Joint Directors of Health Services, there is a Deputy Director of

Health Services. The whole State, at the Divisional Level, has been divided

75

into Seven Circles for convenience of administration and each Circle is in-

charge of a Deputy Director of Health Services.

All the health related functions are performed by the minister of health.

These functions are performed by the Urban Development Minister through the

local governments instead of Minister of Health. In case of urban area Urban

Development Minister surveys the work of Municipal Corporation and

Corporation. There is also a Health Officer in the corporation to carry out the

health programmes. The Ministry of Health provides technical guidance to

them, but cannot interfere in the work or directly supervise them. This is same

in the case of rural area. The health officer of the Zila Parishad and their

assistant health officer carry out the health programmes through the health staff.

HEALTH BODIES

3.4.1 STATE HEALTH MISSION

Recognizing the importance of health in the process of economic and

social development and improving the quality of life of our citizen particularly

of poor and vulnerable section of the population the central government has

resolved to launch the National Rural Health Mission to carry out the necessary

architectural correction in the basic health care delivery system. The mission

adopts a synergic approach relating health to the determinant of good health

viz. segment of nutrition, sanitation, hygiene and safe drinking water. It also

aims at mainstreaming the Indian system of medicines to facilitate health care.

The plan of action includes increasing public expenditure on health,

reducing regional imbalances in health infrastructure, pooling resources

integration of organizational structure, optimization of health management

decentralization of district management of health programs, community

participation, ownership of assets induction of management and financial

personnel into the district health system and operationalization of community

health center into functional hospital meeting Indian public health standard in

each block of the state.

76

The implementation of the National Rural Health Mission with

architectural correction was under active consideration of the Government of

Maharashtra. In this regard Government of Maharashtra has passed the

following resolution:

Resolution: Government is pleased to constitute a State Health Mission on the

lines of the National Rural Health Mission. Composition of mission is as

follows:

Hon. Chief Minister is the Chairperson, Hon. Dy. Chief Minister is Co.

chairperson, and Hon. Minister Public Health is Dy. Chairman. Hon.

Additional Chief Secretary is the member secretary. The State Health Mission

meets at least once in every 6 months. The business of the mission is as follow:

• Providing health system oversight

• Consideration of policy matters related with health sector (including

determinants of good health) review of progress in implementation of

NRHM.

• Inter sectoral coordination

• Advocacy measures required to promote NRHM visibility.

The state health mission was constituted on15th

October 2005

3.4.2 STATE HEALTH SOCEITY

The state health society was constituted on 24th October 2005. State

health society comprises of governing body and executive committee, which

serves in an additional managerial and technical capacity to the dept of public

health for effective implementation of NRHM / RCH II.

a) The governing body has Chief Secretary as the Chairperson, Principal

Secretary Planning Department as the co-chair person and Additional Chief

Secretary Health as the Vice-Chairperson. Mission Director is the member

secretary of the governing body. The committee has also nominated non

77

official members and representatives from development partners as members.

The business of the governing body is as follows :

• Approval /endorsement of annual state action plan for the NRHM.

• Consideration of proposals for institutional reforms in health and family

welfare sector.

• Review of implementation of annual action plan

• Inter sector coordination: all NRHM related sectors and beyond

(e.g. administrative reforms across the state)

• Status of follow up action on decision of the State Health Mission.

• Coordination with NGOs / donors / other agencies / organizations.

b) The executive body has Additional Chief Secretary Health as the

Chairperson, Commissioner Family Welfare as the Co-chair Person and

Director Health Services as the Vice-Chairperson. Mission Director is the

member secretary of the executive body. These committee has also nominated

non official members and representative from development partners as

members. The business of the executive body is as follows:

• Detailed implementation and expenditure review

• Approval of proposals from district and other implementing agencies /

district action plan

• Execution of the approved state action plan, including release of funds

for programmes at state level as per annual action plan

• Release of funds to the district health society

• Finalization of working arrangement for intra sectoral and inter-sectoral

coordination.

• Follow up action on decision of the governing body.

After sanction of state action plan by the governing body of the State

Health Society and of district plans by executive committee funds are released

through joint signature of authorized signatories.

78

3.4.3 DISTRICT HEALTH MISSION

On the lines of State Health Mission every district has a District Health

Mission headed by the Chairperson Zila Parishad and District Collector as the

Co-chairperson and Chief Executive Officer as the Mission Director. To

support the District Health Mission every district has a District Integrated

Health and Family Welfare Society and all the existing societies are merged in

it.

3.5 SOME IMPORTANT HEALTH PROGRAMMES RUN BY

PUBLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN MAHARASHTRA

STATE

To cure the disease and heal the injuries and give relief from pains to the

patients is the first responsibility of every public health center. At the same

time, execution of the various health programs deputed by the Central and State

Government is also the responsibility of public health centers. Hitherto several

measures have been undertaken by the Central and State Government to

improve the health of the people. However, The Central Government cannot

maintain an organization reaching every individual and protecting every

community with adequate service. Not only would such an organization fail;

but in this country of local government such a situation would not and should

not be tolerated. It is but slightly less absurd to expect a state.3 State

Government has successfully implemented these programs through the public

health care system. A brief account of these programs which are currently in

operation is given below :

3.5.1 FAMILY WELFARE

The family welfare program is being implemented in the State since

1957. It is a high priority program. To stabilize population and improve quality

of life is the main objective of this program. Sterilization program under family

welfare is well established in the state. During the 2008-09 there were 238.5

79

thousand sterilization operations performed with different sterilization methods

in the State, however the target (450 thousand) was not achieved.4

3.5.2 REPRODUCTIVE AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMME (RCH)

With an objective to improve the performance of family welfare in

reducing maternal and infant mortality, unwanted pregnancies and thus lead to

population stabilization the Second Phase of Reproductive and Child Health

(RCH-II) was launched on 1st April, 2005 for period of five year. During the

2008-09 Rs. 224.64 crore were sanctioned and an expenditure 0of Rs. 177.16

crore was incurred under the RCH.5

3.5.3 JANANI SURAKSHA YOJANA (JSY)

The Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) is a modified scheme of National

Maternal Benefit Scheme. JSY is being implemented in the State since 2005-06

with objective of reducing maternal and neo-natal mortality by promoting

institutional deliveries among the poor pregnant women. Under the scheme, for

urban area, Rs. 600 and for rural area Rs. 700 is given to the beneficiary after

delivery in the institution within seven days while for home delivery an amount

of Rs. 500 is given to the beneficiaries having up to two living children. During

the 2008-09 Rs. 23.81 crore expenditure was incurred under the same scheme.6

3.5.4 NATIONAL RURAL HEALTH MISSION (NRHM)

Recognizing the importance of health in the process of economic and

social development and to improve the quality of life of its citizens National

Rural Health Mission (NRHM) was launched on 12th

April, 2005. The main

aim of NRHM is to provide accessible, affordable, accountable, effective and

reliable primary health care and bridging the gap between rural health care

through creation of a cadre of Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA). The

mission will be an instrument to integrate multiple vertical programs along

with their funds at the district level. The programs to be integrated are existing

80

programs of health and family welfare including RCH-II; National Vector

Borne Disease Control Programs against malaria, filaria, kala azar, dengue

fever, etc.; National Leprosy Irradiation Program, National Tuberculosis

Program, National Program for Control of Blindness, Iodine Deficiency

Disorder Control Program and Integrated Disease Surveillance Project. The

NRHM also attempts to make effective integration of health determinants like

sanitation and hygiene, nutrition and safe drinking water.7

3.5.5 SCHOOL HEALTH PROGRAM

Under this programme students from I to IV standard are examined

every year and are provided free of cost medical services. For needy students

even major operations like cardiac surgeries are provided free of cost. During

2008-09 about 108.02 lakh students from 79543 schools throughout the State

were examined and primary treatment was given for illness and referral

services were provided for major illness.8

3.5.6 UNIVERSAL IMMUNIZATION

Universal Immunization Program was started in 1985-86 to achieve 100

per cent immunization and to reduce mortality and morbidity among infant and

young children due to vaccine preventable diseases such as Tuberculosis (T.B.),

diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus, polio, measles. The immunization

programs include the vaccination like BCG, DPT, Polio, Hib, Measles, DT,

Tetanus etc. Over the period, coverage of different vaccination is increasing but

it has yet to reach the cent per cent target. During 2008-09 the State

Government has incurred an expenditure of Rs. 11.26 crore under this head.9

3.5.7 PULSE POLIO PROGRAM

The Pulse Polio Immunization Program is the largest ever conducted

program of immunization in every country across the world. In India, with

intension to eradicate polio disease from all over the country Pulse Polio

81

Immunization Program was started on 9th

December 1995. Maharashtra State

has made good progress in controlling the spread of wild polio virus in the

State. Under this programme, all children below 5 years of age are given dose

of oral polio vaccine. During 2008-09 an expenditure of Rs. 26.64 crore was

incurred for the program.

3.5.8 NATIONAL AIDS CONTROL PROGRAM (NACP)

Looking at the gravity of HIV infections in the country, Government of

India started National AIDS Control Program (NACP) in the year 1987. It is a

100 per cent centrally sponsored scheme implemented in the State through

Maharashtra State AIDs Control Society (MSACS). Monitoring HIV

supervisors, controlling STDs, controlling the spread of HIV infection from

mother to child, condom promotion, provision of antiretroviral treatment,

school aids education, AIDS telephone helpline, etc. are the major features of

NACP. 10

3.5.9 NATIONAL VECTOR BORN DISEASE PROGRAM

National Vector Born Disease Control Program (NVBDCP) is being

implemented for prevention and control of vector borne disease like Malaria,

Lymphatic Filariasis, Japanese Encephalitis (JE), Dengue, Chikungunya and

Chandipura, etc. In 2008-09, there were 165 people died due to malaria, 21

people died due to dengue and 16 people died due to chandipura disease.

3.5.10 INFLUENZA A (H1N1) PANDAMIC (SWINE FLU)

With the time medical science has achieved a great success in control

and eradication of various endemic and pandemic chronic diseases. However,

with the changing situation diseases also changed, some new diseases raising

their heads in society, the H1N1 disease also being one of them. During 2009,

the State faced a serious problem due to Influenza A (H1N1) popularly known

as a Swine Flu. It is an air borne disease, which spreads rapidly in the

82

community through coughing and sneezing of positive patients. So far, about

4606 people have been found H1N1 positive, 224 people have died due to this

dangerous disease. Pune region was found to be the most affected area in the

state where 123 deaths occurred due to swine flu in till 2009. The State

Government accepted different measures to prevent spread of swine flu. The

measures taken by the State are as follow:

• Medical teams are deployed at air ports, railways stations, harbors and

bus stations to screen international passengers and domestic passengers

for influenza like illness.

• To isolate and treat suspected and affected cases, the Government has

started Identified Isolation Wards (IIWs) in every district. Private

hospitals have also been involved in this activity.

• Free facility of laboratory diagnosis of H1N1 is provided at National

Institute of virology, Pune and Haffkine Institute, Mumbai.

• 142 members ‘Rapid Response Team’ (RRT) have been trained to tackle

swine flu

• Sufficient quantity of Temiflu capsule, syrups, masks, hand sanitizers

are provided.

Up to the end of November 2009, 107 IIWs and 1501 screening centers are

available in the State, 0.79 lakh suspected cases have been given Temiflu.

Along with these health programs Jeevandayi Arogya Yojana (JAY)

providing financial assistance to BPL families for major surgeries of organs,

Navsanjivani Yojana to reduce maternal mortality and infant mortality in tribal

areas, Matrutva Anudan Yojana (MAY) to provide health services to pregnant

women, antenatal care (ANC) Registration, regular health check up and to

provide required medicine to women in tribal area have been implemented in

the State.

83

3.6 EXPENDITURE ON PUBLIC HEALTH OF

MAHARASHTRA STATE

There has been no standard definition of health care expenditure. It is a

well known fact that the health status of the people is influenced by a large

number of factors and is a function of medical care, income, education, sex,

marital status, and environmental pollution etc. Given too many factors

influencing health it becomes difficult to define what items constitute health

care spending and what truly reflects health care expenditure. However, expert

on health economics have explicitly mentioned that all that activities that

primarily and significantly contribute for improving health status of the people

should be included and others should be judged on their merit. (Berman

Peter,1994)

As we know medical and health comes under the State list. Under the

revenue expenditure head developmental expenditure of state government

incurred a huge amount on the social services. Expenditure on social services

includes the heads such as education, sports, cultural, expenditure on health and

family welfare, water supply, sanitation, information and broadcasting,

SCs/STs and OBCs welfare scheme, social welfare, nutrition, etc. An

expenditure on health and family welfare is one of the most significant

elements of expenditure on social services. In order to increase health status the

state government has spent a huge fund under the head of health and family

welfare. However, India’s social services were used relatively little by the poor.

The health of the poor has improved but not as a whole. Physical access to

health services has improved but inequalities exist because of biases in locating

facilities.11

Social services policies are not comprehensive enough and the quality of

services is low. The bureaucracy is inadequate to reach the poor. Existing

capacity and resources are inadequate, particularly for education and health.12

84

Table no. 3.1

Growth Profile of Expenditure of Maharashtra State on Public Health (Rs. in crore)

Year Total

Exp.

% of

10 to

2

Total

Rev.

Exp.

% of

10 to

4

Total

Dev.

Exp.

% of

10 to

6

Exp on

Social

Services

% of

10 to

8

Exp.

on

H&FW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1980-81 3094 5.24 1917 8.45 1435 11.29 678 23.89 162

1990-91 10773 4.43 8754 5.45 5616 8.49 3024 15.77 477

2000-01 48160 3.31 37401 4.26 22699 7.03 14351 11.11 1595

2001-02 54911 3.25 38281 4.66 20551 8.68 14137 12.62 1784

2002-03 61215 2.71 40474 4.09 22527 7.35 14228 11.64 1656

2003-04 70356 2.51 42680 4.14 22860 7.73 15990 11.06 1768

2004-05 76206 2.48 51047 3.7 28776 6.57 17549 10.78 1891

2005-06 72362 2.94 52280 4.06 30583 6.95 19917 10.66 2124

2006-07 78506 2.87 61385 3.67 36279 6.21 23559 9.57 2254

2007-08 82194 3.28 64780 4.16 40934 6.58 26773 10.07 2695

2008-09

RE 103461 3.05 78607 4.01 51620 6.11 32752 9.64 3156

2009-10

BE 122762 2.58 96184 3.29 61076 5.19 30255 10.47 3167

G.R.

(1980-81 to

1990-91)

3.4819 0.8454 4.5665 0.645 3.9136 0.752 4.4602 0.6601 2.9444

G.R. (1990-91 to

1900-2001) 4.47043 0.7471 4.2724 0.7816 4.04184 0.8280 4.7457 0.7045 3.3438

G.R. (2000-01 to

2009-10) 2.549 0.7795 2.5717 0.7723 2.6907 0.7383 2.1082 0.9424 1.9856

C.G.R. 9.256 -0.701 10.855 -2.135 12.741 -3.771 10.882 -2.152 8.4904

Note : C.G.R. is calculated for the year of 2000-01 to 2009-10.

Source : Economic Survey of Maharashtra of various years.

85

Observations

Table no. 3.1 shows the growth in expenditure on public health and

family welfare of Maharashtra State and its percentage to total expenditure,

total revenue expenditure, development expenditure and expenditure on social

services. The following things were found.

1. Expenditure on health and family welfare increased from 162 crore to

477 crore during 1980-81 to 1990-91 with the growth rate of 2.94, It

reached 1595 crore during 2000-01 with growth rate of 3.43. In 2008-

10 the expenditure on health and family welfare increased to 3067

crore with growth rate of 1.9. It means, in last 10 years the growth rate

of expenditure on health and family welfare had declined

2. The percentage of health and family welfare to total expenditure was

declined from 5.24 per cent in 1980-81 to 4.43 per cent 1990-91, 3.31

per cent in 2000-01 and 2.58 per cent in 2008-09.

3. The percentage of health and family welfare to total revenue expenditure

declined from 8.45 per cent in 1980-81 to 5.45 per cent 1990-91, 4.26

per cent in 2000-01 and 3.29 per cent in 2008-09.

4. The percentage of health and family welfare to developmental

expenditure declined from 11.29 per cent in 1980-81 to 8.49 per cent

1990-91, 7.03 per cent in 2000-01 and 5.29 per cent in 2008-09.

5. The percentage of health and family welfare to developmental

expenditure declined from 23.89 per cent in 1980-81 to 15.77 per cent

1990-91, 11.11 per cent in 2000-01 and 10.47 per cent in 2008-09.

Revenue expenditure on health as a share of total government

expenditure shows a declining trend reflecting the inadequate commitment of

the state towards increasing health care demands of the population. This shows

that the amount of health and family welfare was diverted somewhere else.

86

3.7 PANCHAYAT RAJ INSTITUTIONS AND PUBLIC HEALTH

The local health department is that agency through which government

delivers adequate health service to the community.13

Maharashtra has a well

functioning Panchayat Raj System since last five decades with administrative

and financial powers delegated to these institutions. The state has a three-tier

structure of PRI. Zila Parishad is the District level body having subject-based

committees. The administrator at ZP level is Chief Executive Officer (IAS),

while the Collector handles law and Revenue departments. Hence the CEO is

the District Development Officer for the District. in the State of Maharashtra

and hence he/she is also the Chairperson of the District Integrated Health and

Family Welfare Society.

All the development programs are run through Zila Parishad. Panchayat

Samiti (PS) and Gram Panchayats PRI structure at block level and village level

respectively. The personnel working at various levels are required to interact

with the PRI members. Dist. Health Officer who is at par with Chief Medical

Officer (Health) works under the control of Zila Parishad. Taluka Health

Officers (THO) and Medical Officer (MO) PHC work in liaison with PS and

sub-center staff works in liaison with the GP. The Zila Parishad is fully

involved in planning, implementation and review of all health programs

including RCH, which are implemented on agency basis through Zila

Parishads. The PRI members at district level (Zila Parishad), block level

(Panchayat Samiti) and village level (Village Panchayat) are regularly oriented

and involved in various health initiatives. They play an active role in

community level activities for motivating the villagers and stakeholders in

CNA, demand generation and monitoring the functioning of various health

programs.

State has developed a training module for members of Panchayat Raj

Institutions on various issues under NRHM with the help of UNFPA and State

Rural Development institute (Subsidiary of YASHADA) the state run

Development Administration Academy. The 3 day module has been finalized

& the actual training/ sensitization of PRI members are being conducted in all

87

districts of the state. The state has also set up village health committees to

monitor the health issues and liaison with the health institutions.

3.8 EXPENDITURE OF ZILLA PARISHADS ON PUBLIC

HEALTH

The Zila Parishad is the agency of rural local self government at the

district level. The rural primary health services mainly PHCs and Sub-PHCs

are working under administrative control of Zila Parishad. It means Zila

Parishad is responsible for the health status of the rural mass at district level.

To establish and provide management of hospitals, dispensaries and planning

health centers are the functions of Zila Parishad government related to health of

the people residing in rural area. The Zila Parishad incurred the expenditure on

health under the head of Public Health.

Table 3.2 shows that, the expenditure of Zila Parishad made by

government on public health was increased from 98.58 crore in 1990-91 to

747.45 crore in 2006-07 with the growth rate of 6.12. However its percentage

to total revenue expenditure was not so much changed. In fact C.G.R. shows

the decreasing percentage of health expenditure to total revenue expenditure

during the period of 1990-91 to 2006-07. It was also observed that Rural Per

capita public health expenditure was very low and it increased from 17.67 to

144 during the same period with the growth rate of 17.67 per cent. It short,

considering the overall period the expenditure of Zila Parishad on public health

has decreased.

88

Table no. 3.2

Growth Profile of Expenditure of Zila Parishads on Public Health

(1990-91 to 2006-07)

Year Total Revenue

Expenditure

(in Cr.)

Medical &

Health

Services

(in Cr.)

% of 3 to 2 Rural Per capita

exp. on health by

ZP govt.

(census 2001)

(in Rs.)

1 2 3 4 5

1990-91 1180.14 98.58 8.35 17.67

1991-92 1274.93 116.24 9.12 20.84

1992-93 1731.01 135.10 7.80 24.22

1993-94 2022.62 160.18 7.92 28.72

1994-95 2310.33 163.94 7.10 29.39

1995-96 2828.61 216.10 7.64 38.74

1996-97 3358.57 264.65 7.88 47.45

1997-98 3784.34 279.84 7.39 50.17

1998-99 4150.28 312.75 7.54 56.07

1999-00 4783.51 328.29 6.86 58.86

2000-01 5337.42 372.42 6.98 66.77

2001-02 5841.07 387.04 6.63 69.39

2002-03 5952.48 402.63 6.76 72.18

2003-04 6124.04 424.83 6.94 76.16

2004-05 6742.33 487.16 7.23 87.34

2005-06 7141.26 622.48 8.72 111.6

2006-07 8161.52 747.45 9.16 134

G.R. 6.92 7.58 1.10 17.67

C.G.R. 12.5813 12.1297 -0.3981 12.12

Source : Economics Survey of Maharashtra

89

3.9 EXPENDITURE OF GRAM PANCHAYATS ON HEALTH

AND SANITATION

The Gram Panchayat is a village level local body and village is divided

into wards. The cleanliness, sanitation, safe water supply, information to PHC

about natural calamities and including epidemic, etc. are health related

functions of Gram Panchayats. Gram Panchayats in Maharashtra State incurred

expenditure on health and sanitation as shown below :

Table 3.3 indicates that, the expenditure of Gram Panchayats on health

and sanitation was increased from 16.34 crore in 1990-91 to 241.21 crore in

2006-07 with the growth rate of 14.76. However its percentage to total revenue

expenditure was not much changed. The compound growth rate (1.0103 per

cent) shows the fluctuations in the percentage of expenditure on health and

sanitation to total expenditure incurred by Gram Panchayats.

3.10 MISMANAGEMENT OF BUDGETARY PROVISION

The Maharashtra State is considered as a progressive State in India. But

in the case of health subject we can see an extreme mismanagement in

budgetary provision in the same State. The huge amount has been demanded

every year on account of public health but actually State is unable to spend

provisional amount which is average 60-70 per cent of the estimated budget 1.

This revelation can be distressing for the State. The outcome budget of the

Ministry of Health released from time to time showed that the State did not

spend whooping amount out of their allocation. The non-utilisation of almost

one third of the total allocation for different health programmes poses a serious

question on the State willingness and capability to distribute the resources

provided for the health of people.

90

Table no. 3.3

Expenditure of Gram Panchayats for the years 1990-91 to 2006-07

Year Total

Expenditure

( in Cr.)

Health and

Sanitation

( in Cr.)

% of

3 to 2

1 2 3 4

1990-91 80.47 16.34 20.31

1991-92 88.06 18.74 21.28

1992-93 100.60 24.27 24.13

1993-94 123.79 30.40 24.56

1994-95 135.81 33.19 24.44

1995-96 156.85 38.31 24.42

1996-97 223.73 69.16 30.91

1997-98 296.38 94.09 31.75

1998-99 352.43 127.91 36.29

1999-00 380.33 125.47 32.99

2000-01 399.31 107.26 26.86

2001-02 529.36 146.06 27.59

2002-03 544.39 148.18 27.22

2003-04 662.47 166.58 25.15

2004-05 758.44 192.34 25.36

2005-06 832.23 211.67 25.43

2006-07 938.58 241.21 25.70

G.R. 11.66 14.76 1.27

C.G.R. 17.7004 18.8905 1.0103

Source : i) Economic Survey of Maharashtra

91

Table no. 3.4

Budget of Public Health Department of Maharashtra State 2002-03 to

2006-07

(Rs. in crore)

Year Estimated

budget for

public

health

Provision for

on public

health

% of

3 to 2

Actual

Expenditure

on public

health

% of 5

to 3

1 2 3 4 5 6

2002-03 616 327 53.08 209 63.91

2003-04 698 477 68.34 303 63.52

2004-05 511 374 73.19 288 77.01

2005-06 769 401 53.15 305 76.06

2006-07 820 418 50.98 277 66.27

Average 59.54 69.35

Source : Economics Survey of Maharashtra (various years)

Table no. 3.4 indicates that, during 2002-03 State Government had

somehow managed to spend 209 (63.91 %) crore out of 327 crores of allocation.

After some ups and downs during 2006-07 State Government had spent 277

(66.27) crores on public health out of total allocation of 418 crores. The State

Government has failed in spending the allocated amount. An average spending

on public health is less than 70 per cent of its allocated budget during year of

2002-03 to 2006-07. Outcome budget did not mention the reasons behind such

huge unspent money on ongoing health programmes but it is understood that

lack of will on the part of State Government, bureaucratic red tapism, non-

recruited officers or staff and corruption were the major factors.

92

3.11 INFRASTRUCTURE OF RURAL PUBLIC HEALTH

SERVICES IN MAHARASHTRA

Generally, the health status of the people depends on the easy

availability of the health care services. Therefore, the availability of basic

health facilities is considered as an important determinant of health status.

3.11.1 DISTRICTWISE NUMBER OF SUB-PHC, PHC AND CHC IN

MAHARASHTRA

Availability of public health care services is essential to know the health

status of people of the particular state. In the health care sector, we can see the

disparity in spread of rural public health care services across the Maharashtra

State. The table no. 3.5 indicates the district wise number of public health

centers in Maharashtra State. The table also shows inter district disparity in

number of public heath centers. Nashik District has the highest number of Sub-

PHCs (577), PHCs (106) and CHCs (26). On the other side, Hingoli District

has the lowest in number of Sub-PHCs (132), PHCs (24) and CHCs (5) in the

Maharashtra State. The table also indicates that, Vidarbha and Marathwada

have less number of public health centers compared to western maharashtra.

The average number public health center is Sub-PHCs (320), PHCs (55) and

CHCs (12). However, the district such as Akola, Aurangabad, Bhandara, Beed,

Buldhana, Dhule, Godiya, Hingoli, Jalana, Latur, Nandurbar, Parbhani, Raigarh,

Sindhudurga, Wardha and Washim are having a less number of Sub-PHC, PHC

and CHC/RH than average number.

93

Table no. 3.5

District wise Number of Sub-PHC, PHC and CHC in Maharashtra State

Sr. no. District No. of

Sub-PHC

No. of

PHC

No. of

RH/CHC

1 Ahmadnagar 555 96 21

2 Akola 178 30 6

3 Amravati 333 56 13

4 Aurangabad 279 50 8

5 Bhandara 193 33 8

6 Beed 280 50 13

7 Buldana 280 52 14

8 Chandrapur 339 58 13

9 Dhule 232 41 7

10 Gadchiroli 376 45 12

11 Gondiya 237 39 10

12 Hingoli 132 24 5

13 Jalgaon 442 77 20

14 Jalna 213 39 9

15 Kolhapur 413 72 17

16 Latur 252 46 11

17 Nagpur 316 49 11

18 Nanded 377 64 14

19 Nandurbar 290 58 12

20 Nashik 577 106 26

21 Osmanabad 206 42 8

22 Parbhani 214 31 8

23 Pune 539 96 23

24 Raigarh 288 55 13

25 Ratnagiri 378 67 10

26 Sangli 320 59 11

27 Satara 400 71 14

28 Sindhudurg 248 38 10

29 Solapur 431 77 13

30 Thane 492 79 14

31 Wardha 181 27 8

32 Washim 153 25 8

33 Yavatmal 435 63 17

Maximum 577 106 26

Minimum 132 24 5

Average 320.58 55 12.333

S.D. 118.63 21.026 4.871

C.V. 0.370 0.382 0.395

Source : Directorate of Health Services, Government of Maharashtra, Pune.

94

3.12 INDICATORS OF HEALTH IN MAHARASHTRA STATE

The health status of the people is determined by numerous factors such

as per capital income, way of life, housing, sanitation, water supply, nutrition,

education, geography, climate, etc. However, the State Government

expenditure on public health and existing health infrastructure are the most

influential aspects of health status of the people. In other words, Health

indicators are the outcome of State Government’s expenditure on public health

and wide spread of public health care system in the state.

Up to now, we have studied the State Government’s and Local

Government’s expenditure on public health and State wide infrastructure of

health care services. Now it is time to find relation between Government health

expenditure and health indicators. Health has to be defined from a practical

point of view and, therefore, it has been defined according to life expectancy,

infant mortality, and crude death rate, etc.14

Basic indicators of health like birth

rate, death rate, infant mortality rate, total fertility rate as well as life

expectancy give broad picture of health status of a State. They can be used for

assessing specific health care needs and also for evaluating quality of health

services and programs.

In the present study health status is examined by the movement of health

indicators. Table no. 3.6 shows that, birth rate in rural area of Maharashtra

State was declined from 28.0 in 1991 to 18.1 in 2009 while total birth rate of

Maharashtra State also reduced from 26.2 to 17.6 in the same period. It shows

the birth in rural area is still higher compare to total birth rate; the total birth

rate consists of rural and urban birth rate. Decrease in birth rate shows the

people’s awareness regarding the benefits of small family. The decline in birth

rate which is a positive signal of health has been attributed to national family

planning program, which is implemented through the network of public health

care services.

95

Table no. 3.6

Selected Health Indicators in Maharashtra State

(1991-2008)

Year Birth Rate Death Rate Infant

Mortality

Rate

Total

Fertility

Rate

Life

Expectancy at

Birth (years)

Rural Total Rural Total Rural Total Rural Total Total

1991 28.0 26.2 9.8 8.2 69 60 3.4 3.0 64.80

1992 27.4 25.3 9.1 7.9 67 59 N.A. N.A. 64.80

1993 27.1 25.2 9.3 7.3 63 50 N.A. N.A. 64.80

1994 26.9 25.1 9.2 7.5 68 55 N.A. N.A. 64.80

1995 26 24.5 8.9 7.5 66 55 N.A. N.A. 64.80

1996 24.9 23.4 8.7 7.4 58 48 3.2 2.6 65.35

1997 24.4 23.1 8.6 7.3 56 47 N.A. N.A. 65.35

1998 23.6 22.5 8.9 7.7 58 49 N.A. N.A. 65.35

1999 21.6 21.1 8.7 7.5 58 48 N.A. N.A. 65.35

2000 21.4 21 8.6 7.5 56 48 N.A. N.A. 65.35

2001 21.1 20.7 8.5 7.5 55 45 2.6 2.1 69.63

2002 20.6 20.3 8.3 7.3 52 45 2.5 2.3 69.63

2003 20.1 19.9 8.2 7.2 48 42 2.4 2.3 69.63

2004 19.9 19.1 6.8 6.2 42 36 2.4 2.2 69.63

2005 19.6 19.0 7.4 6.7 41 36 2.4 2.2 69.63

2006 19.2 18.5 7.4 6.7 42 35 2.3 2.1 69.63

2007 18.7 18.1 7.3 6.6 41 34 2.2 2.0 69.63

2008 18.4 17.9 7.4 6.6 40 33 2.1 2.0 69.63

2009 18.1 17.6 7.6 6.7 37 31 2.1 2.0 70.5

Source : Economic Survey of Maharashtra 2008-09

96

Death rate has considerably declined from 9.8 in rural area and 8.2 in

overall Maharashtra in 1991 to 7.4 in rural area and 6.7 in overall Maharashtra

in 2009. It has been attributed to mass control of diseases and advance in

medical science, better health facilities and impact of national health programs.

Infant mortality rate is one of the most universally accepted indicator of

health status not only of infants, but also of whole population and the socio-

economic condition where they live. According to table, it has declined from

69 in rural area and 60 in overall Maharashtra in 1991 to 40 and 31 respectively

in 2009.

Total fertility rate represents the average of children a woman would

have if she were to pass through her reproductive years bearing children at the

same rates as the women now in each age group.15

It is selected as a health

indicator because every childbirth influences the health of woman, and frequent

pregnancies can deteriorate the health of women. According to the table total

fertility rate in rural area declined from 3.4 in rural area and 3.0 overall

Maharashtra in 1991 to 2.2 and 2.0 in 2009, which will be helpful for the

improvement of health of women.

Life expectancy is a good indicator of health status of people in the

state. As an indicator of long term survival, it can be considered as a positive

health indicator. The trend in life expectancy shows that, people are living

longer, and they have a right to a life in a good health. The present life

expectancy of people in the State is 70.5 years, which was 64.80 years in 1991.

Demographer opined that further increase in life expectancy may be continuing

in future.

3.13 RURAL HEALTH SERVICES AND NIGATIVE ATTITUDE

OF MAHARASHTRA GOVERNMENT

Even though, Maharashtra has been at the forefront of the health care

development in India and one of the first States to achieve the norms mandated

for PHC, Sub- PHC and RH, the real picture of rural public health services

97

shows the dismal of state government. The government has concealed their

lacunas in the parade. Here, the researcher has made an attempt to bring

forward these lacunas. It will catch the attention of the government and the

State will make endeavour to remove these lacunas. It will be helpful to place

Maharashtra in the forefront of parade of health care development in real

meaning.

3.13.1 SHORTFALL OF MANPOWER

Shortfall of manpower is the most distressing difficulty before rural

public health services. The detail information about shortfall of manpower at

the each level health centre is discussed in this part of study.

3.13.1.2 SHORTFALL OF MANPOWER AT SUB-PHC

MAHARASHTRA STATE

Sub-primary health center is first contact point between the patient and

public health care system. And the problem of lack of manpower also begins

from the grass root level. The shortfall of the manpower at sub center level is

given bellow:

Table no. 3.7

Shortfall of Manpower at Sub-PHC Maharashtra State

(As on March 2008)

Name of the

post

Required Sanct-

ioned

In

Position

Vacant Shortfall

R S P S-P R-P

HW(F)/ANM 12395 12645 12027 618 368

HW(M)/MPW 10579 12210 9956 2254 623 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

Table no. 3.8

Shortfall of Manpower at Sub Centre in

Trabal Area of Maharashtra State

(As on March 2008)

Name of the

post

Required Sanct-

ioned

In

Position

Vacant Shortfall

R S P S-P R-P

HW(F)/ANM 2075 2025 1536 489 539

HW(M)/MPW 2075 2025 1006 1019 1069 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

98

Table no. 3.7 and 3.8 indicate that, sub-PHCs in rural area are facing the

problem of short fall of 368 female health workers and 1069 male health

worker who are backbone of the concerned system. On the other hand Sub-

PHCs in tribal area need 539 female health worker and 1069 male health

workers.

3.13.1.2 SHORTFALL OF MANPOWER AT PHC OF

MAHARASHTRA STATE

Primary health centers are working at the second stage in rural public

health system. It is the first referral unit for sub-PHC. The shortfall of man

power at this secondary stage is as follow :

Table no. 3.9

Shortfall of Manpower at PHC of Maharashtra State

(As on March 2008)

Name of the

post

Required Sanct-

ioned

In

Position

Vacant Shortfall

R S P S-P R-P

Doctors 1816 1800 1191 609 625

HA (F)/LHV 1816 3740 3323 417 1399

HA (M) 1816 4598 3182 1416 400 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

Table no. 3.10

Shortfall of Manpower at PHC in Tribal Area of Maharashtra State

(As on March 2008)

Name of the

Post

Required Sanct-

ioned

In

Position

Vacant Shortfall

R S P S-P R-P

Doctors 320 316 280 36 40

HA (F)/LHV 320 316 316 0 4

HA (M) 320 316 241 75 79 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

Table no. 3.9 and 3.10 show that, shows that in case of rural area, there

was a shortfall of 625, 1399 and 400 for the post of doctor, female health

assistant and male health assistant respectively in PHC. In case of tribal area

there is a shortfall of 40, 04 and 79 for the same posts in Maharashtra State.

99

3.13.1.3 SHORTFALL OF MANPOWER AT CHC OR RH IN

MAHARASHTRA STATE

Rural hospitals or community health centers are the first referral unit for

the PHC and second referral unit for the Sub-PHC. It is mostly working as a

curative unit. It is the most significant and upper level part of rural public

health care services.

Table no. 3.11

Shortfall of Manpower at RH in Maharashtra State (As on March 2008)

Name of the post Required Sanct-

ioned

In

Position

Vacant Shortfall

R S P S-P R-P

Surgeon 407 53 69 * 338

Obstetricians &

Gynaecologists

407 133 143 * 264

Physicians 407 59 41 18 366

Paediatricians 407 69 99 * 308

Total Specialists 1628 314 352 * 1276

Radiographer 407 407 294 113 133 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

Table no. 3.12

Shortfall of Manpower at RH in Tribal Areas of Maharashtra State

(As on March 2008)

Name of the Post Required Sanct-

ioned

In

Position

Vacant Shortfall

R S P S-P R-P

Surgeon 69 71 17 54 50

Obstetricians &

Gynaecologists

67 71 28 43 39

Physicians 67 71 7 64 60

Paediatricians 67 71 23 48 44

Total Specialists 268 284 75 209 193

Radiographer 67 71 52 19 15 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

Table no. 3.11 and 3.12 show that, though rural hospitals are a vital link

of rural public health care chain, yet there is shortfall of health specialist like

surgeons, obstetricians and gynaecologists, physicians and paediatricians.

These are indispensable aspects of the rural hospitals. If these specialists are

not available in the hospital then no patients come to the rural hospitals for cure

100

of their disease. Nevertheless, total 407 rural hospitals in the state have

shortfall of 338 surgeons, 264 obstetricians and gynaecologists, 366 physicians

and 308 paediatricians. On the other hand rural hospitals in tribal area have a

shortfall of 50 surgeons, 39 obstetricians and gynaecologists, 60 physicians and

44 paediatricians. In short, most of the rural hospitals are functioning without

the specialists.

1.13.1.4 SHORTFALL OF PHARMACISTS, LABORATORY

TECHNICIANS AND NURSE MIDWIFE/STAFF NURSE

AT PHC AND RH OR CHC IN MAHARASHTRA STATE

Pharmacist’s and laboratory technician’s posts are as important as

doctors and paramedical staff. The shortfall of these posts at PHC and RH is

given bellow:

Table no. 3.13

Shortfall of Pharmacists, Laboratory Technicians and Nurse

Midwife/Staff Nurse at PHC and RH in Maharashtra State

(As on March 2008)

Name of the

post

Required Sanctioned In

Position

Vacant Shortfall

R S P S-P R-P

Pharmacists 2223 2367 1976 391 247

Laboratory

Technicians

2223 803 769 34 1454

Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

Table no. 3.14

Shortfall of Pharmacists, Laboratory Technicians and Nurse

Midwife/Staff Nurse IN Tribal Area of Maharashtra State

(As on March, 2008)

Name of the

post

Required Sanctioned In position Vacant Shortfall

(R) S P S-P R-P

Pharmacists 387 387 322 65 65

Lab

technicians

387 387 356 31 31

Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

101

Table no. 3.13 and 3.14 show the shortfall of 247 pharmacists and 1454

lab technicians in rural area and 65 pharmacists and 31 lab technicians in tribal

area of Maharashtra State. It means that considering the requirement of

manpower the State Government has sanctioned the posts, but most of the posts

in the rural public health centers are still vacant. Hence, rural public health

system suffered the problem of shortfall of staff in one hand and excess burden

on available staff on the other.

3.13.2 BUILDING POSITION OF RURAL PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM

Establishment of building facilities of health center is one of the basic

requirements for health care delivery. Building of health care center is a one

time but a huge investment for the government. Therefore in the initial phase of

public health care services, it was not possible to the government for afford

such huge investment for establishment of building for every health center at

once. Hence, it was decided that, the building would be hired, rental or rental

free voluntary basis from Gram Panchayat building or private owner. With the

time, government made provision for building fund and buildings were built for

the health centers. At present most of the health centers are functioning in their

own buildings but a few are still functioning in the rental building.

Table no. 3.15

Position of Buildings for Sub-PHC, PHC and RH/CHC

in Maharashtra State (As on March 2008) Name of health

center

No. of

health

center

no. of sub-centers functioning

in

Building

under

counstr-

uction

Building

required

to be

constructed Govt

Build

Rented

Building

Rent free

Panchayat/

vol. soci.

Buildings

Sub-PHC 10579 7442 867 2270 650 2487

PHC 1816 1518 10 288 137 161

RH/CHC 407 297 4 106 38 72 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

102

Table no. 3.16

Position of Buildings for Sub-PHC, PHC and RH/CHC

in Tribal Areas of Maharashtra (As on March 2008) Name of health

center

No. of

health

center

No. of sub-centers functioning

in

Building

under

counstr-

uction

Building

required

to be

constructed Govt

Build

Rented

Building

Rent free

Panchayat/

vol. soci.

Buildings

Sub-PHC 2075 1611 152 312 162 302

PHC 320 246 5 69 39 35

RH/CHC 67 44 2 21 7 16 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

Table no. 3.15 and 3.16 shows that, in rural and tribal area there are

1654 Sub-PHCs, 2136 PHCs and 474 RHs functioning in their own building in

2008. 449 Sub-PHCs, 372 PHCs and 133 RHs were functioning in rented or

rent free volunteer social building. 812 Sub-PHCs, 176 PHCs and 45 RHs

buildings were under construction. Yet there was a requirement of additional

buildings of 2789 Sub-PHCs, 196 PHCs and 88 RHs to be constructed.

3.13.3 FACILITIES AVAILABLE AT SUB-CENTRES IN

MAHARASHTRA STATE

Supply of sufficient and clean water and continuous supply of electricity

are the basic needs of any health centers. Water is essential for drinking, bath,

washing clothes, and clean environment. On the other hand electricity is used

for light in the health center, electronic medical equipments, medicinal

refrigerator etc. Quarters for the staff are also an essential requirement of the

staff working in rural public health center.

Table no. 3.17

Facilities Available at Sub-Centers in Maharashtra State

(As on March 2008)

No. of existing

Sub-PHC

No. of Sub-PHC

with ANM

Quarters

Without

Regular Water

supply

Without Electric

Supply

Number % Number % Number %

10579

7442

70.3

5349

50.6

4812

45.5

Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

103

Residence quarters, water supply and electricity these are the basic

needs of each health center; still 29.7 per cent PHCs are without ANM quarters,

49.4 per cent sub-PHCs are without regular water supply and 54.5 without

electric supply in the Maharashtra State.

Table no. 3.18

Facilities at PHCs in Maharashtra State (Total PHCs 1816)

(As on March, 2008)

Facilities No. of

PHCs

% to total PHC

With Labour room 1498 82.5

With Operation Theatre 1516 83.5

With 4-6 Beds 1518 83.6

Without Electric supply 182 10.0

Without regular water supply 509 28.0

With telephone 980 54.0

With computer 535 29.5 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

Table no. 3.18 shows the availability of necessary facilities at PHC. In

2008, out of total PHCs in the state 17.5 per cent PHCs had no labour room,

16.5 per cent PHCs had no operation theatre, 16.4 per cent PHCs were facing

the problem of inadequate beds, 10 per cent PHC had no electricity, 28 per cent

PHCs had no regular water, 46 per cent PHCs are without telephone facility

and 75.5 per cent PHCs have no computer facility.

In such a situation, we can not say that the state has been at forefront of

health care development in the country.

3.13.4 AREA, DISTANCE AND VILLAGES COVERE BY RURAL

PUBLIC HEALH CENTER

The average area, average radial distance and average number of

villages covered by rural public health care centers are as follows :

Table no. 3.19

Average Rural Area, Average Radial Distance and Average Number of

Villages covered by Primary Health Care Institutions (As on march, 2008)

Covering aspects Sub-PHC PHC RH/CHC

Average Rural Area (Sq. Km.) 28.39 165.39 737.98

Average Radial Distance (Kms) 3.01 7.25 15.32

Average no. of villages 4 24 107 Source : Rural health bulletin 2008

104

Table no. 3.19 depicted that, Sub-PHC, PHC and RH covers average

28.39 sq. km., 165.39 sq. km. and 737.98 sq.km. area of Maharashtra State.

The average radial distance for sub-PHC is 3 kms, PHC 7.25 kms and RH

15.35 kms. However, each sub-PHC carries average 4 villages, PHC 24

villages and RH 107, which is actually more that their norms.

All this tends to suggest that not only there is an acute shortage of

medical specialists, but there is also a mis-match of facilities and specialists in

a majority of public health centers, implying sub-optimal utilization and thin

spread of available resources.

3.14 CONCLUSION

This chapter concludes that, though Maharashtra State has progressed

well in many of the health indicators, its achievement is worse when compared

to State like Kerala. Within the State there are inter-district and intra-district

variations in health indicators. There is vast discrepancy in the spread of health

services among the districts of Maharashtra State. It is necessary to emphasis

on the increase in infrastructure in rural area. The local governments i.e. Zila

Parishad and Gram Panchayat seem to be indifferent to health expenditure and

health status of the people in rural area. State Government seems to be lethargic

in optimum use of funds and unable to expend the fund allocated in budget for

public health sector. The rural public health services are facing the problem of

inadequate manpower e.g. doctors, paramedical staff and other staff and it has

direct influence on the utilisation of rural public health centers by the rural

people. The private and corporate health services are not affordable for poor

and downtrodden rural mass. Hence, the government should take steps to

reduce this shortfall of manpower as well as emphasis on increase in health

investment in rural area. As there are number graduates and post graduate and

105

qualified doctors and nurses available in the state, they may be employed at the

shortfall posts. If government gives satisfactory salary and service rules, no

doubt the young health workers will join the services. But government is

shifting its responsibility to NGO and to private sector, but it is not desirable.

The constitutional provisions regarding health services seem to be forgotten by

the State Government.

106

R E F E R E N C E S

1. Bishop E. L., ‘Responsibility of Government in Public Health Work’

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. X No. 6, Nashville, Tenn, June 1928.

2. Government of India (2006), Annual Report 2005-06, Ministry of Health and

Family Welfare, New Delhi, 2006.

3. Bishop E. L., ‘Responsibility of Government in Public Health Work’

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. X No. 6, Nashville, Tenn, June 1928.

4. Economic Survey of Maharashtra, Directorate of Economics and Statistics,

Planning Department, Annual Report, Mumbai, 2009-10.

5. Park K., Preventative And Social Medicine, M/s Banarasidas Bhanot,

Jabalpur, 2009.

6. Economic Survey of Maharashtra, Directorate of Economics and Statistics,

Planning Department, Annual Report, Mumbai, 2009-10.

7. Park K., Preventative and Social Medicine, M/s Banarasidas Bhanot,

Jabalpur, P- 379, 2009.

8. Economic Survey of Maharashtra Directorate of Economics and Statistics,

Planning Department, Annual Report, Mumbai, 2009-10.

9. Ibid

10. Swarnkar Keshav, Community Health Nursing, N. R. Brothers, Indore, 2007,

PP- 614-615.

11. Rout R.P. H. S. and Panda P. K., Health Economics in India, New Century

Publications, New Delhi, 2007, P- 10.

12. Murthy, Hirway, Panchmukhi P., and Satia, ‘How well do India’s Social

Service Programmes seve the poor?’, World Bank Policy Research Working

Paper WPS 491, World Bank, New Delhi, 1990.

13. Bishop E. L., ‘Responsibility of Government in Public Health Work’

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. X No. 6, Nashville, Tenn, June

1928.

14. Reddy K. N., Health Expenditure in India, Working Paper No. 14, NIPFP,

New Delhi, 1992.

15. The John Hopkins University, Population Report, M-8, Sept.-Oct. 85,

Baltimore, Maryland, 1965.


Recommended