+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Health & Safety Stakeholder Reference Group

Health & Safety Stakeholder Reference Group

Date post: 08-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: chione
View: 33 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Health & Safety Stakeholder Reference Group. 29 November 2012 2 - 4pm Level 7, 222 Exhibition Street. Minutes/Action Items Marketing Update Legislation Policy& Information Update Prevention Update Other Business Close. Agenda. Time. Agenda item. 2.00. 2.10. 2.30. 2.50. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
36
Health & Safety Stakeholder Reference Group 29 November 2012 2 - 4pm Level 7, 222 Exhibition Street
Transcript
Page 1: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Health & Safety Stakeholder Reference Group

29 November 2012

2 - 4pmLevel 7, 222 Exhibition Street

Page 2: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Minutes/Action Items

Marketing Update

Legislation Policy& Information Update

Prevention Update

Other Business

Close

Agenda

Time Agenda item

2.00

2.10

2.30

2.50

3.10

4.00

Page 3: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Apologies, Minutes, Actions

Apologies

Previous Minutes - SRG dated 24 October 2012

Action items from previous meeting

Page 4: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Marketing Update- WorkSafe online environment

Steve Gosbell

Page 5: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 5Page 5

A big gap between the current client experience and where we need to be

The key issue

Approx 1.2M unique visits to worksafe.vic.gov.au every year

• only 53% of them report they can successfully complete their ‘task’

But ‘satisfaction’ is at 65% - maybe our screens look pretty?!

• a website will never be perfect for everyone but we must aim for >80% satisfaction

Our online audience is growing and we haven’t kept up with their expectations (including a growing expectation to ‘transact’)

Page 6: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 6

• Reported Satisfaction however runs at 65%

Only 1 in 2 people can complete their main task

Page 7: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 7

• Respondents employed at companies with 21-99 employees were most satisfied overall, with nearly three-quarters (72%) indicating they were either satisfied or very satisfied.

• One-fifth (20%) of respondents from companies with 1-4 employees were either dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the website overall.

People in small businesses are least satisfied

Page 8: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 8Page 8

The long tail

Over 1000 pages deep; 1000’s of links

Probably too much emphasis on niche content, making it more difficult for the most popular content to be found. Certainly there are structural issues.

Page 9: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 9

Page 10: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 10

Contributing to this situation

• A very inflexible platform – recently fixed

• Current site launched in 2005

• Fragmented landscape with no comprehensive plan or architecture for our online activity

• Owners of these properties are numerous and operate largely independently of one another

Page 11: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 11

• New platform (Squiz). Migration completed July ‘12• Incremental improvements to current site – redesigns and new content

development with a much greater emphasis on understanding key tasks and ‘user journeys’.

• Avoiding the temptation to simply replicate offline content into our online environment

• Where possible, developing online transactional capability, eg Plant registration

What are we doing now; and then what…

Page 12: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 12

A shared vision

What WorkSafe

wants from its online channel

What users want from WorkSafe’s

online channel

Background reading

Interviews across WorkSafe to understand strategic needs

Focus groups Development of

personas & key task scenarios

To establish a shared vision for WorkSafe’s online channel that meets both user needs and business goals, and articulate how the organisation can bring this vision to life.

Page 13: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 13

Understanding & designing around our landscape

We won’t just focus here

We need good online systems to help this group collaborate better to deliver a great online service

Page 14: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 14

USER-DRIVEN ONLINE EXPERIENCE

Develop a new website that:• allows clients to find what they’re looking for, talks in a language they

understand and provides information in a format they can follow (enablers)

• allows organisational stakeholders to communicate as effectively and efficiently as possible

• is the sole hub for WorkSafe’s online delivery

Develop a System that:• allows clients to complete key tasks online (e.g register plant, make a

claim, manage a claim, pay your premium, apply for a license etc, etc) • facilitates more efficient service delivery and a greater understanding of

clients

Page 15: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 15

A NEW VISION

A new model for website content that:• makes information easy to find• tailors content to user needs• prioritises key tasks• seamlessly integrates website content and backend system(s)

This model can accommodate different content filtering approaches across the website

Note this is simply an illustrative sample – not a page design

Page 16: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 16

A NEW VISION

Delivering real-time, personalised online interactions to users

Cross-divisional collaboration across WorkSafe is essential to achieving this vision

It will deliver transparency to all throughout the claims process

Note – illustrative of ‘system’ capability only

Page 17: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 17

Timeframe

• Internal consideration Jan – Apr ‘13• Commence development of new website June ’13

> Develop info architecture

> Audit current content

> Develop new content as required

> Launch new site (without interactive ‘system’) Dec ’14

• Commence development of interactive system June ’13

> Define system development approach Jan – Nov ‘13

> Develop business case Dec ’13 – Apr ’14

> Design & development July ’14 – Apr ’17

> Launch ‘system’ within website May ‘17

Page 18: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Legislation, Policy and Information Services

Angela Jolic, Cath Duane & Linda Timothy

Page 19: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 19

Remake of Dangerous Goods (Storage and Handling) Regulations

• New Regulations will commence on 1 December

• Review and update of the Code of Practice for the Storage and Handling of Dangerous Goods has commenced

• 1st draft of the Code has been provided to key stakeholders for comment

• Proposed Code of Practice will be made available for public comment in February 2013

• Code of Practice is on track to be finalised mid April 2013

Page 20: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 20

Codes Review Project

• Some feedback has been received on preliminary recommendations

• Feedback is generally supportive of recommendations

• Next steps

• Recommendations finalised

• Proposed workplan developed

• Brief Minister

Page 21: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 21

Report on national OHS forums

Safe Work Australia Members Group meeting – 21 November

• Endorsed 12 of 13 draft model codes of practice

• Endorsed exposure standard – Man-made Vitreous Fibres

• Agreed to progress nationally consistent explosives legislation

• Agreed to publish 3 papers providing further detail on Australian Work Health and Safety Strategy

• Agreed to publish:

• Research reports – psychosocial safety climate and worker health; Residual chemicals in shipping containers

• Work-related Traumatic Fatalities, Australia 2010-2011

Page 22: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 22

Australian Work Health and Safety Strategy 2012-2022• The ten-year National Strategy 2012-2022 launched in October

• Victoria has endorsed the National Strategy out-of-session

Strategy aims to:

• Reduce work-related fatalities by 20%

• Reduce serious injury claims by 30%

• Reduce incidence rate of musculoskeletal disorder claims by 30%

Page 23: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 23

Regulators Harmonisation ProjectAgenda items for HWSA 4 December 2012

• Overall status for RHP work

• Consider reinstating Model guide on EPH/right of entry

• Consider amendments to already-endorsed RHP documents

• Consider draft documents for implementation of Plant Regulations

• Consider model operational procedure – dealing with alleged non-

• complied Provisional Improvement Notices

• Consider draft audit tool for monitoring approved EPH training

• Consider request for RHP to develop common criteria for considering suspension/revocation of authorisations

Page 24: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 24

Regulators Harmonisation Project

Other HWSA agenda items • Imported Materials with Asbestos

• ACCC Asbestos Recall

• National Audit Tool for Vehicle Hoists

• HWSA Campaigns Status Reports

• WHS Legislation Issues Resolution

• Introduction of carbon price equivalent to synthetic greenhouse gases - potential safety issues

• ONRSR – HWSA MoU update

• ASQA – HWSA MoU update

Next HWSA meeting dates (proposed) for 2013:14 March, 13 June, 12 September, 12 December

Page 25: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 25

SWA Implementation TAG Last met 1 November 2012• Further proposed technical amendments agreed by ITAG members

except potential for regulator to waive requirement for a current photograph with applications for renewal of HRW licence

• Proposed FAQs/guidance – comments to be provided to SWA

• Each WHS regulator to locally communicate that r217 (requiring ROPs and FOPs on earthmoving machinery) be deleted (note HWSA considering exemption in meantime)

• Agreed to extended transitional dates for new types of HRW licence (e.g. reach stackers) due to delay in units of

• competency/assessment instruments being finalised

• Comments on proposals to change diving regulations to be provided to SWA

Page 26: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 26

Any questions?

Page 27: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Prevention UpdateBernie Dean

Page 28: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 28

WorkSafe response to Caple’s HSR training opportunities

Page 29: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 29

HSR training opportunities as identified by Caple

• Less emphasis on legislation

• Greater focus on hazard identification, risk assessment, job safety analysis, consultation and issue resolution

• Adult learning principles

• Relevant case studies

• Work-based scenarios

• Utilise SWA package of HSR training materials as input to review of existing learning outcomes

Page 30: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 30

Retain current Victorian package of HSR training materials

but

with a re-focus on HSRs as the primary audience

Option 1

Page 31: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 31

Implement the SWA package of HSR training materials

Adapted to

Victorian OHS Laws

Option 2

Page 32: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 32

Implement the adapted SWA package of HSR training materials

PLUS

offer a WSV developed training course

Option 3

Page 33: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 33

33

Updates on:• Dangerous machines

• Residential aged care

• Manual Handling

• Small business

• Psych hazards

SRG Prevention update- Oct 2012

Page 34: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Page 34

Dangerous machinesPublic awareness and duty-holder focussed activity in progress. Next stage to focus on development of inspectorate interventions on specific types of machines and ‘supply chain’ for key products

Residential aged careAgreement reached at S/H forum to use ISO Technical Report as basis for development of training package and tools for inspectorate and duty-holders around manual handling of patients.

Small BusinessTender for consultants still in development. Concerns about eligibility criteria in initial proposal. Feedback will inform changes and refinements to the tender

Manual Handling•Research by David Caple. 40-50 employer and stakeholder interviews•To gather information on how people commonly go about identifying and assessing when manual handling poses an OHS risk to workers. Not a review of compliance and enforcement.•Helping to identify the currency and utility of existing materials available on manual handling- the Regs, the Code and guidance materials- amongst people at work.•Internal Advisory Group convened.•Stakeholder Reference Group 13 December

Stress:Development of discussion draft continuing. To be tabled at PR Stakeholder Forum in coming weeks.

Page 35: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Other Business

Page 36: Health & Safety  Stakeholder Reference Group

Close

Next SRG meeting 28 February 20132 - 4pm


Recommended