School of Sport and Exercise SciencesPhysical Education and Sport Pedagogy Group
Loughborough
London
SSES
How well does PEpromote active lifestyles?
Recommendations forphysical educators and PETEs
November 2012
Dr Jo Harris
Loughborough University
SSES
Health warning!
SSES
Physical education isthe foundation for, and
cornerstone of,physical activity
promotion
SSES
PE’s key contribution to public health is effective promotion of
active lifestyles
SSES
PE pays a lot of lip serviceto this area…we talk
a good story but we don’t always ‘walk the talk’
SSES
Some activities (e.g. games) are not more important
than others (e.g. dance, gymnastics)
SSES
What is this obsessionwe have with
competitive team games?
SSES
Physical education is different from, but
connected to, physical activity and sport
SSES
Key features of curriculum PE are ‘learning’ and ‘inclusion’
LEARNINGINCLUSION
SSES
As a consequence, school PEneeds to be taught by
well qualified professionals who regularly access professional
development
SSES
The identified learning in PE lessons is as, if not more,
important, than the selected context (i.e. activities)
SSES
To promote physical activity, it is not essential to exercise
children to exhaustionor make everything fast
and furious
SSES
You don’t need to fitness test a child to help
them be more active
SSES
You don’t need to weigha child to help
them be more active
SSES
Fitness testing could bepart of the solutionbut, unfortunately,
is more often than notpart of the problem
SSES
Monitoring activity levels is more important than
fitness testing
SSES
PE teachers should know more about ‘physical activity’ recommendations than
‘fruit & veg’
5 a day One hour a day
SSES
I am not anti-competition,anti-games, anti-performance,
or anti-fitness testing
SSES
PE teachers shouldmeasure what’s important (e.g.
physical activity levels, attitudes), not what is
easiest to measure(e.g. fitness, fatness)
SSES
Assessment policies should give credit where it is due…
PE teachers should stop rewarding skills only
SSES
Teaching physical competenceis key to developing children’s
confidence and desire to be active
SSES
Schools don’t necessarily need more funds, time or equipment
to promote physical activity well
SSES
Me then
• PE teacher: concerns about non-participants and low ability and/or disengaged pupils
• Hope: pupils active out of/when leave school, didn’t care at what level
SSES
Me now
• Influences: Len Almond, Chuck Corbin, Ken Fox, Stuart Biddle…
• 30 years of HRF…
• Pragmatist
SSES
Focus
The role of schools and PE, in particular, in promoting active lifestyles and the extent to which this contributes to public health
SSES
Limited, to date
• To date, the effectiveness of school PE in this area has been somewhat limited.
• Says who?
• Why?
SSES
Says who? ‘PE has not delivered the goods’ (Trost, 2006)
• Enduring emphasis on competitive team sports rather than true lifetime activities.
• Failure to meet public health objectives.• Experiences not consistent with the goal of
promoting lifelong PA.• Served the needs of athletically gifted children at
expense of less athletic children whose need for regular PA and positive movement experiences is greater.
SSES
‘It’s boring until Year 10, you have to learn all the skills and do the same stuff over and over
again’ (Smith & Parr, 2007)• 11-14 year olds:
dissatisfaction with repetitive, skills-based lessons.
• 14-16 year olds: more +ve, lessons more sociable, recreational, game-oriented, more choice.
• But mismatch between PE and leisure activities.
SSES
‘If you’re not good at a certain sport then you don’t like it’ (Lake, 2001)
• PE: dislike of - sport, teams, competition; feelings of: incompetence, frustration, forced participation.
• Competitive team sport - privileged position in discourse - polarised orientations towards sport, PE and exercise.
• Need to challenge the privilege afforded to particular modes of participation and to make efforts both to recognise and value alternative activities and meanings.
SSES
Resistant to change andrequires radical change
• Resistant to change; dominated by multi-activity, sport-based forms since mid-C20th.
• Transmission of decontextualised sport-techniques to large classes. ‘When are going to play a game Sir/Miss’?
• Learning rarely moves beyond introductory levels.
• A conservative force in a largely conservative educational establishment.
SSES
But, there are good reasons for PE’s limited effectiveness in this area
• Reduced physical activity in life generally
• Competing, sedentary leisure-time activities
• Limited (and/or reducing) PE time/resources
SSES
Plus, it’s complicated & difficult!
• Behaviour change and social reform is highly complex.
• There are no quick or easy fixes to activating a nation.
SSES
Are we serious?
• If PE is serious about its contribution to public health, and is to be taken seriously, it needs to consider doing more than it currently does to promote active lifestyles.
SSES
PE, the chameleon of all curricula
• ‘Muddled mission’.
• Educating in and through the use and knowledge of the body and its movement.
• ‘Learning to move’ and ‘moving to learn’.
SSES
PE involves promotionof active lifestyles √√√
BUT there is less clarity about:
•What it is called
•How this is achieved
•How much it should be prioritised.
SSES
A rose by any other name?
• HRF?
• HRE?
• HRPE?
• HEPE?
• Health and Fitness?
• Fitness?
• Active Lifestyles?
SSES
Summary from Research on HRPE
What do we know?
What do we NOT know?
SSES
How healthy is PE?
• Expression of health in PE is neither universally accepted nor understood.
• HRE = different things to different people.
• Superficial understandings.
SSES
Confusion, narrow interpretations& unfounded assumptions
• HRPE = dreary drill, running laps, FT
• HRPE = MVPA• PA = Fitness• HRPE = daily PE• HRPE = lifetime
activities only• Health =
shape/size/weight or a fitness/bleep test score
SSES
Testing, training and tinkering
• Teaching of activity areas untouched
• ‘Fitness for life’ discourses commonly expressed through ‘fitness for performance’ practices e.g. testing, training activities.
SSES
Mind the Gap!
Rhetoric/Policy Reality/Practice
SSES
National Curriculum for PEin England
• Key Concepts: healthy, active lifestyle.
• Key Processes: making informed choices about healthy, active lifestyles.
• Range and Content: exercising safely and effectively to improve health and well-being.
SSES
Physical Education and Health, Quebec Education Program
Competency:
•Adopts a healthy, active lifestyle
– Commit to a process of changing lifestyle habits
– Demonstrated by developing/implementing a plan that must include regular PA and by showing the ability to critically reflect on their own process and lifestyle habits and to analyse impact on health and well-being.
SSES
‘Thrash Yourself Thursday (TYT)’Lisa McDermott,
University of Alberta, Canada• Canadian elementary school fitness-based
initiative to produce ‘healthy’ students
• Participant observation; conversations with teacher and semi-structured interviews with 20 pupils (6-8 years)
• Discursive onslaught intent on reconceiving PE as a site for intervening in the ‘pathologies’ of ‘inactivity’ and ‘obesity’.
SSES
PETE Problems
• PETE is not adequately preparing future PE teachers to promote healthy, active lifestyles.
• Changes need to be made to health-related interactions and experiences within PETE.
• PE is unlikely to effectively promote healthy, active lifestyles without the health-related aspect of PETE being radically changed, especially and crucially the school-based provision.
SSES
Health-related modelsand approaches
• Physical Activity, Fitness and Wellness Education (Siedentop & Tannehill, 2000)
• The Stairway to Lifetime Fitness (Corbin & Lindsey, 1997)
• Pedagogical Model for Health-Based PE (Haarens et al., 2011)
SSES
Physical Activity, Fitnessand Wellness Education
• To provide children/youth with the skills/knowledge that will prepare them to develop and maintain physical activity
• Stairway to lifetime fitness: doing activity and exercise; getting fit; self-assessment of fitness and activity; self-planning; lifetime physical activity; lifetime fitness
• Level of dependence – level of decision-making; level of independence
SSES
Stairway to Health
The Fun Theory
SSES
Pedagogical Model for HBPE
Draws on Jewett, Bain & Ellis’ (1995) and Metzler’s (2005) work on models-based practice in PE.
Central theme: pupils valuing a physically active life, so that they learn to value and practice appropriate physical activities that enhance health and well-being for the rest of their lives.
SSES
How?
• Requires that teachers’ beliefs are oriented towards self actualisation and social reconstruction.
• The affective domain (valuing physical activity) needs to be prominent in planning for learning.
SSES
Case for Developing new‘PE for Health’ Pedagogies
• Surprising silence around the pedagogies to be used in the health dimension of PE practices.
• Development of new, complex, evidence-based, personalised ‘PE-for-health’ pedagogies is next major step in PE research.
SSES
Personal thoughts/views• PE develops competent
and confident movers who regularly participate in and benefit from PA...leading to a lifetime of activity and enhanced quality of life.
• Enormous potential to contribute to public health but significant challenges/constraints, and unreasonable expectations.
SSES
But we need to...
• Distinguish PE from PA and sport.
• Clarify the learning beyond improving performance.
• Meet the needs of ALL, especially ‘hard to reach’/vulnerable children.
SSES
Polarised views
• HRPE = anti-competition, games, performance, fitness testing.
• The teaching of skills and fitness need to be separated.
• There is a hierarchy of activities.
SSES
Non-evidence-based practice
• Fitness tests do not provide an accurate measure of activity levels.
• Dominant games-based curriculum fails to acknowledge participatory trends of young people.
SSES
Recommendations forphysical educators
• Student-centred: responsibility/decision-making; empowering; acting on dislikes, issues
• Benefits of being active (social, psychological)
• Develop competence and confidence of ALL pupils (fat, inactive, clumsy)
• Reward/praise effort, progress, personal improvement (not just attainment)
SSES
PA promotion mind-set
• Routinely inform of activity opportunities in EVERY unit of work
• Educate about how active should be and assist in setting/achieving activity goals over time
• Regularly monitor activity levels (including participation in PE, inclusive XC) & help to self-monitor/regulate
• Identify/counsel ‘low active’ pupils
SSES
Reach out and move beyond PE• Engage in academic
discourse across the curriculum
• Play a central role in a whole school approach to health/PA
• PA is not solely individually determined, it is dependent on social and physical support mechanisms
• Communicate with families/community members
SSES
Recommendations for PETEs
• Knowledge of: PA & health; determinants of PA; behaviour-change theories.
• Understanding of HR outcomes and how they might be achieved; skilling/re-skilling; creatively connecting concepts with activities.
• Becoming critical consumers of knowledge.
• PA advocacy (parents; policy-makers).
• Working with professionals, diverse learners, families in school & non-school settings.
SSES
Disparate agendas for PEand public health
• PE tends to reflect and reinforce concepts relating to fitness, sport and performance
• While health education is more closely associated with health, activity and participation.
• Consequently, PE teachers tend to be viewed outside the PE profession as sports teachers or coaches, more interested in performance and excellence, than participation and health.
SSES
And finally!
• Activating a nation is complex. PE has a key part to play but can do better.
• PE per se does not promote activity; pupils’ experiences and learning do this, determined by teachers’ philosophies, actions, interactions.
• PE cannot be taken seriously in this area if it continues to pay lip service to it.
SSES
Thank you for your attention!