+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Date post: 03-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: clark-madden
View: 37 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors. My Experience. Two murder cases One manslaughter case Two product liability cases One animal abuse case One workman ’ s compensation case A life care plan with extensive medication list - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
58
Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.
Transcript
Page 1: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to

Reducing Medical Errors.

Page 2: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

My Experience• Two murder cases• One manslaughter case• Two product liability cases• One animal abuse case• One workman’s compensation case• A life care plan with extensive medication list• Several malpractice cases involving

– Pharmacists– Doctors– Nurse Practitioners

Page 3: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Learning Objectives1. Recognize the costs, both human and financial, of

medical errors  2. Define liability and malpractice3. Identify problems in the delivery of healthcare especially

the transition of care from one environment to another4. Describe methods to decrease medical errors by

improving interprofessional communication and medical records

5. Identify at least two classes of medication that may cause harm and result in healthcare litigation even if they are used within the established guidelines.

Page 4: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Introduction• Pharmacists are an integral part of the medical home model

and can help avert costly medication-related problems by working collaboratively with other healthcare providers.

• The New England Healthcare Institute estimates that annual medication-related problems in the U.S. cause:– 156 million physician visits– 23 million emergency department visits– 11 million hospitalizations in the US. – Annual cost of medication-related morbidity and mortality is $290

billion; more than the amount spent on the medications themselves.

– Annual cost of medication-related problems in Maine exceeds $1.7 billion.

Page 5: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Liability

• Criminal- imposed under criminal laws and by means of criminal prosecution

• Civil- relating to private rights and to judicial proceedings in connection with them

• Product- liability imposed on a manufacturer or seller for a defective and unreasonably dangerous product

Page 6: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Malpractice

• Negligence, misconduct, lack of ordinary skill, or a breach of duty in the performance of a professional service (as in medicine) resulting in injury or loss

Page 7: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Negligence vs Intentional Act

• Negligence- the failure to exercise that degree of care which a person of ordinary prudence (practical wisdom; caution) would exercise under the same circumstances.

• Example- a broken nose in a car accident vs a punch • In a negligence case the plaintiff must prove four

elements

Page 8: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Duty

• Requirement to behave in a certain manner for the benefit of another– Duty to fill a patient’s prescription correctly– Duty to counsel patients and perform a drug

regimen review

Page 9: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Breach of the Duty

• A duty can be breached in one of two ways– Nonfeasance- duty is not performed– Malfeasance- activity is performed, but it is

incomplete or incorrectly done– Expert witness will draw on their own experience,

laws and regulations, codes of ethics, and other such items to determine if the pharmacist performed their required duties adequately.

Page 10: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Harm

• A patient must prove they were injured or harmed.– Many states require a physical injury in

order to make a claim for emotional injuries.

– Difficult to separate the symptoms associated with the negligent act from the patient’s underlying pre-existing conditions.

Page 11: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Proximate Cause

• The injury the patient suffered must have been caused by the breach of duty not some other cause or underlying condition– Very important in cases where it is not clear if the

patient actually took the drug in question, or that the symptoms could be caused by some other factor

– Superceding or interceding cause- another event unrelated to the negligent act causes harm or injury

Page 12: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Examples of Pharmacy Negligence

• Dispensing a medication that is different than the dug ordered by the prescriber.

• Correct medication is dispensed in an incorrect dose.• Dispensing the proper medication with a label

containing improper use instructions. • Inadequate or erroneous warnings.• Dispensing a drug that is contraindicated with one or

more of the current medications the patient is taking with no physician order approving the simultaneous use of both substances.

Page 13: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #1• A 19 year old Africa American with a

history of Sickle Cell Disease presented to the emergency room complaining of chest and bilateral arm pain at 1:45am

• Vital signs– Within normal limits except an oxygen

saturation of 93% (normal 95-100%)

Page 14: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #1 • Oxygen therapy via nasal cannula• Medications

– Diphenhydramine 25mg IV x 2 @ 2:50am and 4:10am– Vicodin (5mg hydrocodone/500mg acetaminophen) 2 tablets

by mouth @ 2:40am– Morphine Sulfate 5mg IV @ 2:52am, 10mg IV @ 3:00am,

3:10am, 3:20am, 3:30am, 3:45am, 3:55am, 4:05am (75mg over 73 minutes)

– Ketorolac 30mg IV @ 3:32am– Levaquin 500mg by mouth @ 5:25am

Page 15: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #1 • Patient was awakened from sleep and reexamined at 5:30am • His lungs were clear and he had an oxygen saturation of 99%• He was discharged from the hospital at 5:30am• He was found unresponsive at home by his girlfriend at 5pm• Emergency Medical Technicians arrived at 5:17pm and were

unable to obtain a blood pressure, pulse was 54 with sinus bradycardia, respiratory rate was 4, oxygen saturation was 48%

• Patient was intubated and transported to the hospital where resuscitative efforts were unsuccessful

• Patient was pronounced dead at 6pm

Page 16: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #1 • An autopsy was performed the next day and

death was deemed natural secondary to vascular occlusion as a consequence of Sickle Cell Disease (multiple pulmonary emboli)

• Toxicology- Morphine blood levels were sufficient enough to produce anesthesia and potentially toxic

Page 17: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #1Additional information• Pain index initially 9 out of 10 by 3:45am the

pain index is 3 out of 10 the patient is given the 3:45am injection and two more injections

• They were initially unable to find a vein for the IV so an IV team was paged and they gave the two tablets of Vicodin

• Patient had a history of respiratory depression after opiate administration

Page 18: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #1• How did the morphine contribute to the

patient’s death?• How could this death have been

prevented?

Page 19: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #2• A 78 year old Caucasian female admitted to the

hospital (8/27) with a fractured hip two days after a fall (8/25)

• History of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, depression, dementia, hypothyroidism, glaucoma, and a previous ischemic stroke two years ago.

• Medications- Synthroid, metoprolol, Lexapro, Namenda, Enablex, Simvastatin, Xalatan, Darvocet, Plavix

• Plavix was discontinued on 8/27 two days before the surgery on 8/29

Page 20: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #2• Lovenox was prescribed to prevent

deep vein thrombosis • Patient was transferred to a skilled

nursing facility for rehabilitation on 9/2• Lovenox was discontinued on 9/20• Patient suffered a second ischemic

stroke on 9/30

Page 21: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #2Transition of care• Primary care physician• Admitting Emergency Room physician• Orthopedic surgeon• Cardiologist who cleared the patient for surgery • Physician at the skilled nursing facility• Nurse practitioner at the skilled nursing facility• Consulting pharmacist at the skilled nursing

facility

Page 22: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #2• What could have prevented the second

stroke?• Who is liable?• How could the transition of care be

improved?

Page 23: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #3• A 48 year old Caucasian man who works as a

marine propeller technician presents with diminished kidney function.

• A renal biopsy confirms a diagnosis of Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody-Associated (ANCA) Glomerulonephritis

• The patient had an influenza vaccine administered by a pharmacist six months prior to the impaired kidney function.

Page 24: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #3

• Should the pharmacist be held liable for not adequately explaining the potential adverse effects of the vaccine?

Page 25: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #3

• There are no manufacturer reported kidney adverse effects after immunization of influenza vaccines

• A literature search found two cases of kidney related toxicity after an influenza vaccine.

• One of the cases occurred four days after the vaccination and the diminished kidney function resolved itself after supportive care.

Page 26: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #3

• The patient presented with various symptoms including ear pain, GI pain, and flu-like symptoms (sinusitis and a cough) a few months prior to the vaccination.

• Should the primary care physician be held liable for not diagnosing the ANCA glomerulonephritis?

Page 27: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #4

• A 60 year old female with a history of diabetes (insulin dependent), hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic back pain and possible muscular dystrophy was found dead at her home.

• Other significant historical notes- patient had a recent colonoscopy to remove polyps and an artificial heart valve replacement

Page 28: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #4

• Autopsy findings- obesity, systemic arteriosclerosis, cerebral vascular disease, cardiomegaly, advanced peripheral vascular disease, fatty liver, degenerative joint disease of the spine, possible kidney failure and poorly controlled diabetes, and toxic levels of fentanyl

• Cause of death- cardiomegaly and poorly controlled diabetes– Contributory factor- fentanyl intoxication– Classified as an accident due to drug intoxication

Page 29: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #4

• Current medications- Advair diskus, alprazolam, aspirin (81mg), bupropion, fenofibrate, fentanyl (50 mcg/hr), furosemide, gabapentin, Lantus, melocicam, metoprolol, Nexium, nitroglycerin pump, Novolog, oxycodone, paroxetine, Pro-Air, Vytorin, Warfarin

• The attorney filed a wrongful death complaint against the manufacturer of fentanyl patches claiming the product was defective.

Page 30: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #4• The patch removed from the deceased was discarded.• At autopsy, the fentanyl patch was removed from the sacral region

of the lower back• Black Box Warnings for fentanyl patches and possible contributing

factors– Associated risk of fatal overdose by respiratory depression– Only use the 50, 75, and 100 mcg/h dosages in patients who are already on

and are tolerant of opioid therapy• 60mg of morphine/day, 30mg/oxycodone/day or 8mg hyrdomorphone/day

for a week or longer– Peak fentanyl levels occur between 20 and 72 hours of treatment

Page 31: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #4

Patient Information (Facts and Comparisons)• Avoid exposing the fentanyl application site to direct external

heat sources, such as heating pads, electric blankets, heat or tanning lamps, sunbathing, saunas, hot tubs, and heated water beds.

• Potential for temperature-dependent increase in fentanyl release from the patch that could result in an overdose. Therefore, if patients develop a high fever or increased temperature due to exertion while wearing the patch, they should contact their health care provider.

Page 32: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case #4Warnings/Precautions (Facts and Comparisons)• Administer fentanyl with caution to patients with preexisting

medical conditions predisposing them to hypoventilation.• Insufficient information exists to make recommendations regarding

the use of fentanyl in patients with renal or hepatic function impairment. If the drug is used in these patients, use it with caution because of the hepatic metabolism and renal excretion of fentanyl.

• Do not use soaps, oils, lotions, alcohol, or any other agents on the application site that might irritate the skin or alter its characteristics.

Page 33: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Other Cases Involving Pharmacists

• A 75 year old post-leukemia patient with multiple complications including chronic pain – Pharmacist dispensed immediate release oxycodone

on two separate occasions instead of sustained release – The patient called the pharmacy after the first mistake

and the pharmacist told the technician to tell the client they are from a different manufacturer.

– What should have been done differently to prevent this error?

Page 34: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Other Cases Involving Pharmacists

• A 51 year old woman with an amoxicillin prescription for an infection.– Pharmacist dispenses Seroquel 400mg– The Seroquel prescription vial with a label for another

patient was in a bag with the correct amoxicillin receipt.– What changes in the workflow would you implement to

avoid these types of mistakes?

Page 35: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Interactive Case

• A 17 year old with mental status changes resulting from three concussions in a short time period overdoses after the administration of two fentanyl patches stolen from a pharmacy and excessive amounts of alcohol.

• Is the pharmacist liable for this wrongful death?

Page 36: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Interactive Case

• A 43 year old female has been treated for soft tissue injury over the span of four years as the result of a motor vehicle accident.

• Current pain medications – Fentanyl patch 100mcg every 3 days– Opana Extended Release 60mg twice a day– Opana Immediate Release 10mg 4 to 6 tablets every 4 to 6

hours quantity 672 tablets/month

• Does the pharmacist have a legal obligation to assess the efficacy of her pain medication therapy and make recommendations to the prescribing physician?

Page 37: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Interactive Case

• Two dosage increases were noted in her medical record– Opana IR 10mg #120 was increased

to #240 – Opana IR 10mg #240 was increased

to #672

Page 38: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Lessons Learned• Most mistakes are avoidable and many occur during transition of

care or when healthcare professionals are overwhelmed taking care of too many patients.

• Advocate for electronic medical records. • Pharmacist verified orders in an institutional facility may catch

mistakes.• Document errors and use the data to implement solutions.• When you make a mistake try not to make excuses. Offer a sincere

apology and let the patient know how you will change your policies and procedures to avoid similar mistakes in the future.

Page 39: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Professional Advice

• Reach out to other healthcare professionals to optimize patient care

• Purchase individual malpractice insurance• Read and understand the laws, rules and

regulations governing your profession– Contact your professional board or inspector if you have

any questions, concerns or you need interpretation of a legal problem.

– If you have to appear before your professional board, bring legal counsel

Page 40: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Evaluating Patients with Chronic Pain versus the Small

Percentage of Patients who Divert Pain Medications

Page 41: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

The Maine Predicament of Prescription Drug Overdose:

Myths and Realities

Kenneth McCall, PharmD1,Christina Holt, MD, MSc2,; Chunhao Tu, PhD1; Todd Michaelis, MD2; Emily Bourret, PharmD

Candidate1 , Jonathan Balk, PharmD Candidate1

1. College of Pharmacy, University of New England, Portland, ME2. Maine Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine, Portland, ME

Page 42: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Methods

• Design: Retrospective data analysis of the Maine Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) from fiscal years 2005 – 2010 linked to Medical Examiner Cases of all Prescription Drug deaths.

Page 43: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Study Population

• Maine PMP (2005-2010):• 1,024,649 unique patients with 11,542,850

controlled substance prescriptions.

• Rx Drug Overdose Deaths:• 1,007 decedents with 31,736 controlled

substance prescriptions.

Page 44: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Maine Overdose Rate increase among highest in nation

Page 45: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Non-heroin opiate admissions by state per 100,000 population aged 12 and older: 1998-

2008

Source: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS), Data received through 8.31.09.

Page 46: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Treatment Admissions for Substance Abuse

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

2003 2006 2009 2012

Alcohol

Marijuana

Heroin

Cocaine

Opiates

Page 47: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Number of Deaths caused by Pharmaceuticaland Illicit Drugs, 1997-2009 †

†Sorg MH. Drug-induced Deaths in Maine 1997-2008, with Estimates for 2009. Available at http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/samhs/osa/pubs/data/2011/DrugInducedDeathsReport%2097-08%20Final%202[1].pdf

Page 48: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

National and Maine Federal Prosecutions

Source: Chief Judge John A. Woodcock, Jr. US District Court. Prescription Drug Abuse Summit, October 2011, Camden, Maine.

Page 49: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

100112 102 116 129 131

7655 52 48 50 36

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Year of death

Percent of decedents with

PMP records

ME Cases in PMP ME cases not in PMP

Proportion of ME Cases with any record in PMP from 2005 -2010

Page 50: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

“If someone dies of a Prescription Overdose, they must have been suicidal”

539

247

261

525

114

54

82

86

37

16

29

24

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

With PMP records

No PMP records

women

men

Accident Suicide Other Manner of death

Page 51: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

• In 2006, 1.77 million prescriptions were authorized by 4,703 in-state prescribers

(377 prescriptions per prescriber). In 2010, 5,808 in-state prescribers

authorized 2.39 million prescriptions (411 prescriptions per prescriber). In-state

prescribers accounted for an additional 614,213 prescriptions in five years; a

34.6% increase.

Page 52: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

11th Annual Interprofessional Spring Symposium

The Science of Pain & the Art of Healing

Thursday April 4, 2013

Alfond Forum, Biddeford Campus

Page 53: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case Study• In 2001, at age 13, Paula’s life changed

dramatically. During an athletic event, she twisted her ankle and was left with unremitting pain.

• Her injury was initially diagnosed as a sprain and was treated with elevation and a tensor bandage

• X-rays revealed nothing broken; her ankle was wrapped and she was given a pair of crutches.

.

Page 54: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case Study• Another x-ray and a bone scan showed no

fractures but the pediatrician still recommended that her leg (right leg, from knee to toes) be put into a walking cast.

• Six weeks later the cast was removed yet the pain escalated. Paula now used a wheelchair and crutches to aid her mobility.

• Fascia, a layer of fibrous tissue around her leg muscles, was painfully twisted.

.

Page 55: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case Study• The pediatrician next sent Paula to an orthopedic

surgeon who put her ankle into an anterior ankle cast and referred her to a rheumatologist who ruled out arthritis.

• Paula’s pain worsened and she was seen by a series of practitioners who were stymied by her condition.

• According to Paula and her mother Judy, doctors saw her pain as a symptom, not as an aspect of a diagnosable disease.

.

Page 56: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case Study• By this juncture Paula also experienced

allodynia • She obtained some relief of the severe and

constant foot pain she was experiencing through the use of orthotics.

• Her deteriorating pain condition and the side effects of medications increasingly compromised Paula’s daily activities and quality of life.

.

Page 57: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case Study• A physical therapist suspected Paula

might have Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD).

• A pain specialist formally diagnosed her with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), a chronic systemic disease characterized by severe pain, swelling, and changes in the skin and vascualture.

.

Page 58: Healthcare Litigation: An Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Medical Errors.

Case StudyMedication List

nabilone gabapentin

amitriptyline ketamine

memantine pregabalin

venlafaxine clonidine

hydromorphone diclofenac

granisetron docusate calcium psylliumacarbose

.


Recommended