+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Heat Exchanger Design

Heat Exchanger Design

Date post: 16-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: von
View: 26 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Heat Exchanger Design. ME 414 – Team #1 Jennifer Hacker Jesse Kendall Christopher Rogers Brandon Rodriguez Alek Vanluchene. Problem Statement. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
15
ME 414 – TEAM #1 JENNIFER HACKER JESSE KENDALL CHRISTOPHER ROGERS BRANDON RODRIGUEZ ALEK VANLUCHENE Heat Exchanger Design
Transcript
Page 1: Heat Exchanger Design

ME 414 – TEAM #1J E N N I F E R H A C K E R

J E S S E K E N D A L L

C H R I S T O P H E R R O G E R S

B R A N D O N R O D R I G U E Z

A L E K V A N L U C H E N E

Heat Exchanger Design

Page 2: Heat Exchanger Design

Problem Statement

Design a heat exchanger that cools a corrosive chemical with water properties from 45 C to 25 C with a mass flow rate of 220,000 kg/hr using city water at 22 C with variable mass flow rate.

Page 3: Heat Exchanger Design

Design Requirements

Heat Exchanger Length is less than 7 mHeat Exchanger Diameter is less than 2 mMinimize Pressure Losses in both shell and

tubeMinimize Weight

Page 4: Heat Exchanger Design

Variable Reduction

Tube & Shell Material – Stainless Steel

Tube will carry corrosive material for ease of cleaning

Counter flow was selected due to increase efficiency

Single pass selected due to lower pressure drop, small cooling requirement, and cost

Shell thickness was selected to minimize weight and handle maximum pressure of the heat exchanger.

Page 5: Heat Exchanger Design

Variable Reduction Cont …..

Center tube diameter was selected to be the same size as other tubes to reduce cost

For efficiency and ease of cleaning a square pitch was chosen

The pitch angle was chosen to be 90 deg since the angle did not affect the design parameters

The MATLAB program chose the number of tubes based on the shell diameter

Page 6: Heat Exchanger Design

To Baffle or Not?

Advantages Higher Heat Transfer

Disadvantages Higher Pressure Loss Increased Weight

Since the chemical only required a small amount of cooling (20 C) the baffles were not needed for the gain in heat transfer.

Page 7: Heat Exchanger Design

Main Effect Plots - Q

Page 8: Heat Exchanger Design

Main Effect Plots – ΔP Tube

Page 9: Heat Exchanger Design

Main Effect Plots – ΔP Shell

Page 10: Heat Exchanger Design

Main Effect Plots – Weight

Page 11: Heat Exchanger Design

Pareto Chart

Page 12: Heat Exchanger Design
Page 13: Heat Exchanger Design

Minitab Optimization

Page 14: Heat Exchanger Design

End Results

Initial Values Optimized Values UnitsWeight 4000 4022 kgΔP Shell 30000 29930 PaΔP Tube 15000 14630 PaHeat Transfer 3250000 32510000 W/m^2

Shell Mass Flow Rate

85Counter Flow or Parallel CounterNumber of Tube Passes 1Baffles NoShell Inner Diameter 0.6858Shell Thickness 0.001Shell Material Stainless SteelTube Material Stainless SteelTube Outer Diameter 0.00635Center Tube Diameter 0.00635Tube Thickness 0.000457Tube Length 5.5Number of Tubes Calculated by MATLABTubing Pitch SquareTube Layout Angle 90

Page 15: Heat Exchanger Design

Questions

?


Recommended