Yukinao AkamatsuUniv. of Tokyo
Heavy Quark Diffusionin the Quark-Gluon Fluid
2008/11/26Komaba Seminar
Ref : Y. A., T. Hatsuda and T. Hirano, arXiv:0809.1499[hep-ph]
1
Outline
• Introduction• HQ Energy Loss• Langevin HQ + Hydro Model• Numerical Results : HQ• Numerical Results : e±
• Conclusions and Outlook
2
Introduction
3
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collision0 0.6fm O(10) fm
CGC Glasma Hydrodynamics Hadron Rescattering Observed
What ? --- medium composed of light particles (u,d,s,g)
Others : jets --- very energetic light quarks and gluons : heavy quarks (c,b) --- very heavy compared to temperature : J/Psi --- almost colorless : photons --- electromagnetic interaction
Hard Probes
EM ProbeDynamical Probe?
4
Hard Probes
From slides of X.-N. Wang @Hard Probe ’081) Jet Quenching
5
q-hat ~ 4-14 [GeV2/fm]
2) Heavy Quark
From slides of R. Rapp @SQM ’08
6
• pQCD radiative E-loss with upscaled transport coeff. • Langevin with elastic pQCD + resonances + coalescence• Langevin with upscaled pQCD elastic
Radiation vs. Collision
q-hat ~ >14 [GeV2/fm] (line) for rad.non-perturbative for coll.
7
Dynamical Probes?
EM Probe
Hydro + J/yT. Gunji et al. PRC 76:051901,2007
From slides of T. Gunji @SQM ’08
From slides of F.-M. Liu @SQM ’08
Survival of J/Psi ~ 2Tc ?
HQ Energy Loss
8
9
Collisional Energy Loss (E>>M>>T)
(ET>>M2)
(ET<<M2)
(Braaten ‘91)
10
Radiative Energy Loss
Energy Loss 2ˆ2
LqCE RS
(E>>M)
(BDMPS)
322
~ˆ Tq S
μ : Debye mass
λ : mean free path
Langevin HQ + Hydro Model
11
weak coupling (pQCD)1) Energy loss of heavy quarks
HQ q-hats > LQ q-hatsindicates collision
(Armesto ’06, Wicks ’07)
(Caron-Huot ‘08)
12
Heavy Quarks in Medium
Dominance Experiment Higher order
Radiation (g=g(T)) Fast (v ~ c) Not alone ×
Radiation (g=g(mD)) Fast (v ~ c) ? ?
Collision (g=g(T)) Slow (v ~ 0) Not alone ×
Collision (g=g(mD)) Slow (v ~ 0) OK by alone ?
(Moore ’05, van Hees ‘05)(Aichelin ’08)
(Djordjevic ’06)But even rad+coll cannot Non-Perturbative
method is required
relativistic Langevin equation
2) Model of HQ in medium
the only input,dimensionless
in the rest frame of matter
22 6.7 2.272 21 7.2
assume isotropic noise
relaxation time of HQ
(at T=210MeV) 13
strong coupling (AdS/CFT)drag force (= enegy loss dE/dx)
By comparing energy density & HQ pot.
(Gubser ’06,’07, HKKKY ’06, Teaney ‘06),
0 fm….
0.6 fm…
Little Bang
Initial Condition
Brownian Motion
Heavy Quark Spectra
Full 3D hydrodynamics
Electron Spectra
T(x), u(x)
Local temperature and flow
(pp + Glauber)
(Hirano ’06)
c(b)→D(B)→e- +νe+π etc_
time
QGP
Experiment(PHENIX, STAR ’07)14
HQs in Dynamical Medium
1) Flowchart
O(10)fm…
Initial condition
available only spectral shape above pT ~ 3GeV
<HQ in pp><decayed electron in pp>
No nuclear matter effects in initial conditionNo quark coalescence effects in hadronizationWhere to stop in coexisting phase at 1st order P.T. 3 choices (no/half/full coexisting phase)
Reliable at high pT
15
2) Comments
f0=1.0/0.5/0.0
Numerical Results : HQ
16
17
Profile of HQ Diffusion2 time scales : stay time and relaxation time
1) stay time 3-4 fm
18
2) relaxation time steps
FRFS txTtT )()/1(_
T ~ 0.21GeV_
22 6.7 2.272 21 7.2
19
3) pt loss
MpdtTdp /2
20
Nuclear Modification Factor : RAA
21
Elliptic Flow : v2
22
HQ Correlation
pT1>pT2 & pT1>pTtrig 1:trigger, 2:associateGamma 0.0 0.3 1.0 3.0 30.0
<Ts1+Ts2> 7.2fm 7.1fm 6.8fm 6.0fm 6.3fm
Gamma 0.0 0.3 1.0 3.0 30.0
<Ts1+Ts2> 7.0fm 6.7fm 6.0fm 4.0fm 0.6fm
Gamma 0.0 0.3 1.0 3.0 30.0
<Ts1+Ts2> 7.7fm 7.7fm 7.8fm 7.7fm 7.3fm
Gamma 0.0 0.3 1.0 3.0 30.0
<Ts1+Ts2> 7.5fm 7.4fm 7.4fm 7.1fm 4.8fm
23
Numerical Results : e±
24
Nuclear Modification Factor : RAA
Experimental result γ=1-3
AdS/CFT γ=2.1±0.5
25
Elliptic Flow : v2
Poor statistics, but at least consistent.(Still preliminary, PHENIX : v2~0.05-0.1 for pT~3-5GeV)
Conclusions and Outlook
26
27
• Heavy quark can be described by relativistic Langevin dynamics with a parameter predicted by AdS/CFT (for RAA).
• Prediction for heavy quark correlations More effort needed for e-h correlations
• Latest experimental data for v2 seems to have larger elliptic flow Within our model, coalescence even at high pT is necessary ?
• Theoretically, heavy quark energy loss at strong coupling should be reconsidered.
28
To Be Continued…