Francis Turbines
Noelle Fillo, Kimberly Fridsma, Callen Hecker
History
● Developed by James B. Francis in Lowell, Massachusetts○ Founded ASCE○ Locks and Canals company○ 1848
● The first Francis turbine was housed in the Pawtucket Gatehouse in Lowell, MA.
● He based his designs off of other turbines that were designed around that time.
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/22/1/012020/pdf, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_turbine
Pawtucket Gatehouse
History
● Design based off of Benoit Foureyron’s outward-flow turbine and Jean-Victor Poncelet’s inward-flow turbine.
● Can be used in a variety of hydraulic heads and flow levels
● Francis Turbines are a reaction turbine ● First hydraulic turbine with radial inflow
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_turbine, http://turbinegenerator.org/hydro/hydropower-types/francis-turbine, http://www.brighthubengineering.com/fluid-mechanics-hydraulics/27407-hydraulic-turbines-francis-turbine/,
History
● Many different design changes over the years from 1848 to 1920.○ First stock turbine
○ Newer designs included adjustable guide vanes
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/22/1/012020/pdf
Elevation and Plan View of a Francis turbine
http://www.bflhydro.com/img/img-modal-francis.jpg
http://hopshop.net/tours/electric-utility/images/francis-turbine.jpg
The Physics of a Francis Turbine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BCiFeykRzo
Physics Cont.
● Water flows through spiral casing, runners, guide vanes and exits out turbine eye
● Pressure differences caused by blade shape allow for rotation and draws water towards center
● Guide vane angles are manipulated to optimize flow
CFD images showing high velocities near eye and blade edges
http://www.e3k.com/images/CFDfrancis02.pnghttp://www.cfdsupport.com/water-turbine-cfd-manual/francis-turbine-cfd-openfoam-rotor-
results-velocity-1.png
Preventing Cavitation
● Pressure differences caused by flow create vortices that damage surfaces
● Indicated by a popping noise● Static pressure must not go below vapor
pressure● Flow separation at turbine exit must be
avoided to avoid draft tube damage● Must control for:
○ Pressure head○ Flow rate○ Exit Pressure
Advantages of Francis Turbines
● Francis turbines work best for medium to high range heads
● Easily controlled operating head● Francis turbines operate over the largest
range for both flow and head parameters● Large range in size to meet different
power requirements○ Range from 0.25 MW to 1000 MW
● High efficiency○ Generally around 94% Operative ranges of different turbines
http://www.gunt.de/networks/gunt/sites/s1/mmcontent/produktbilder/07036531/Datenblatt/07036531%202.
Advantages
● Francis turbines are mixed flow designs● Francis turbines have the highest
maximum power for turbines● Francis vs. Pelton
○ Smaller and more economical than a Pelton wheel capable of the same power generation
○ More resistant to wear than the Pelton wheel
○ Francis turbines have higher levels of efficiency http://www.gunt.
de/networks/gunt/sites/s1/mmcontent/produktbilder/07036531/Datenblatt/07036531%202.pdf
Disadvantages
● Unclean water can cause rapid wear in Francis turbines
● Cavitation is always a possibility○ Runner erosion○ Losses in efficiency
● Difficult to maintain and clean● Low acceptance of head variation ● Constant adjustment of guide vanes and
runners● Francis turbines are generally limited to
large hydroelectric systems
Possible cavitation areas on the runnerhttp://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:741702/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Effects of cavitation on runnerhttp://authors.library.caltech.edu/25019/1/chap6.htm
Disadvantages
● Francis turbine efficiency significantly decreases with turbine flow rates below 40%○ Decreased flow also greatly increases
cavitation risk● Water hammer effect can cause harmful
effects○ Occurs when runners are forced from high
speed to stopping○ Build up of overpressures can cause
catastrophic results
http://www.plumbingmart.com/water-hammer-information.html
http://www.esru.strath.ac.uk/EandE/Web_sites/01-02/RE_transmission/index.htm
Calculations/Relevant Equations
● Blade Velocity
● Guide vane angle
● Power Generated
● Specific Speed
Example
A Francis turbine is to be operated at a speed of 600 rpm and with a discharge of 4.0 m3/s. If r1 = 0.60 m, β1 = 110⁰, and the blade height B is 10 cm, what should be the guide vane angle α1 for a nonseparating flow condition at the runner entrance?
Case Study I- Itaipu Dam in Brazil/Paraguay
● Located on the Parana River between Brazil and Paraguay
● One of the Seven Wonders of the Modern World
● Second largest hydroelectric power plant● 87.8 TWh generated in 2014● 118m of hydraulic head● 20 Francis turbines
○ 700 MW each○ 16 m diameter
● Average reservoir capacity○ 19x109 m3
http://www.solar.coppe.ufrj.br/itaipu.html
Case Study II- Guri Hydroelectric Power Plant in Orinoco, Venezuela
● On the Caroni River in Necuima Canyon in Orioco, Venezuela
● Installed capacity of 10,200 MW and provides 12,900 GW/h to the country
● Ten 730MW Francis Turbines● Third largest power plant in the
world
http://www.power-technology.com/projects/gurihydroelectric/, http://www.industcards.com/hydro-venezuela.htm,
Case Study III- Vertical Twin Turbines in Australian Irrigation Dams
● Used in Wyangala, Copeton and Burrendong irrigation dams
● Smaller turbines, but useful for privately developed hydro schemes
● Desirable when head is too high for a Kaplan turbine
● Ideal when:○ 13 MW ○ 45 m head
● High efficiency and low priceshttp://www.bryanleyland.co.
nz/uploads/2/9/7/1/29710909/twinfrancisturbines.pdf
Fish-Friendly Francis Turbine Design
● Do not allow cavitation to occur● Direct migratory fish away from
turbines● Low number of blades with thick
edges● Wide wicket gate-runner gaps, ● Wicket gates aligned with stay vanes● Smooth surfaces provided● Use advanced control system and
monitor speeds● Minimize pressure changes
experienced by fishhttp://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/pdfs/doewater-13741.pdf
http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/images/hydropower/newandoldturbinedesign_102313.gif
Conclusions
● Francis turbines are one of the most widely used turbines of our time
● Extremely high efficiency at specific flows
● Come in many sizes and are very versatile
● Large range of power outputs● Wanted when dealing with
relatively medium head and high flows
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0-sfeSq1IWs/maxresdefault.jpg