Institute for Lightweight Structures and Conceptual Design, University of Stuttgart Supervisor Jonathan Busse, Stefan Neuhäuser, Christoph Witte, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Werner Sobek Students Amlis Botsch, Carolin Forster, Orestis Gkouvas, Nicola Haberbosch, Franziska Hann, Julia Heibaum, Jannik Lambrecht, Francisco Pérez Florido, Takashi Sato, Michael Schnell, Andreas Schönbrunner, Jonas Unger, Johanna Zinnecker KUMO @ Blickfang 2011 An interactive installation Arduino OUTPUT INPUT Processing KUMO - System KUMO 1 CONTROL UNIT 4 ACTUATOR 2 SENSOR 3 Conceptual Formulation Design and realisation of an interactive room installation for the lounge of the design exhibition „Blickfang 2011“ in Stuttgart. Working with technologies that make it possible to create dynamic and interactive spaces is one of the priorities of the project along with having the possibility to experience a room. Approach * The lounge is interfacing between the space itself and the visitors of the exhibition inviting them to interact with the lounge or just have a rest and watch others communicate with the space * The name Kumo is japanese and means spider as well as cloud. Hence it combines two characteristic attributes of the installation. On one side the movement of a single element looks a bit like a spider unfolding its legs. On the other side all of them together form something resembling a cloud * Six wooden „legs“ with three hinges each form one Kumo * By opening and closing whilst going up and down the simple movements between the individual elements form the typical dynamics of the instalation
Transcript
Institute for Lightweight Structures and Conceptual Design, University of Stuttgart
SupervisorJonathan Busse, Stefan Neuhäuser, Christoph Witte, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Werner Sobek
StudentsAmlis Botsch, Carolin Forster, Orestis Gkouvas, Nicola Haberbosch, Franziska Hann, Julia Heibaum, Jannik Lambrecht, Francisco Pérez Florido, Takashi Sato, Michael Schnell, Andreas Schönbrunner, Jonas Unger, Johanna Zinnecker
KUMO @ Blickfang 2011An interactive installation
Arduino
OUTPUT
INPUT
Processing
KUMO - System
KUMO1
CONTROL UNIT4
ACTUATOR2
SENSOR3
Conceptual FormulationDesign and realisation of an interactive room installation for the lounge of the design exhibition „Blickfang 2011“ in Stuttgart. Working with technologies that make it possible to create dynamic and interactive spaces is one of the priorities of the project along with having the possibility to experience a room.
Approach* The lounge is interfacing between the space itself and the visitors of the exhibition inviting them to interact with the lounge or just have a rest and watch others communicate with the space* The name Kumo is japanese and means spider as well as cloud. Hence it combines two characteristic attributes of the installation. On one side the movement of a single element looks a bit like a spider unfolding its legs. On the other side all of them together form something resembling a cloud* Six wooden „legs“ with three hinges each form one Kumo* By opening and closing whilst going up and down the simple movements between the individual elements form the typical dynamics of the instalation
Institute for Construction Economics, University of Stuttgart
SupervisorProf. Dr. Christian Stoy, Dipl.- Ing. Maik W. Neumann
StudentJulia Heibaum
Economic and ecological modernisation of office buildings using the townhall of Karlsruhe as an example
Fenster mit Einfachverglasung, Holzrahmen 230 m² Außentüren- / Außenfensterfläche
247,97 €/m² 57.132 €
360 265 m² Dachfläche 13,85 €/m² 3.675 €362 13 m² Dachfensterfläche 278,38 €/m² 3.675 €
362.15 Dachflächenfenster, Metall 13 m² Dachfensterfläche 278,38 €/m² 3.675 €Fenster mit Einfachverglasung, Holzrahmen 13 m² Dachfensterfläche 278,38 €/m² 3.675 €
Kostengruppe (DIN 276-1: 2008-12)Bauwerk - BaukonstruktionenAußenwände
Außentüren und -fenster
Investitionskosten des Bestands
N
NF 1
NF 2
NF 3
NF 4
NF 5
NF 6
NF 7
TF
VF
1. Oberxgeschoss
Erdgeschoss
N
NF 1
NF 2
NF 3
NF 4
NF 5
NF 6
NF 7
TF
VF
1. Oberxgeschoss
Erdgeschoss
-800.000.000 €
-700.000.000 €
-600.000.000 €
-500.000.000 €
-400.000.000 €
-300.000.000 €
-200.000.000 €
-100.000.000 €
0 €
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
Lebenszykluskostenvergleich
Variante A
Variante B
Variante C
Bestand
Conceptual FormulationMost of the buildings that we are using today were built in between 1950 and 1980 which means that the life span of fassades and building services is almost over. The costs for maintenance work, energy supply, cleaning etc. are therefore accordingly high. As they can be multiple times higher an early statement not only concerning the investment costs but the life cycle costs is taking on greater significance. The aim of this project is to present various modernisation versions for the Townhall of Karlsruhe considering its entire life cycle and its assessment.
Approach* Correlating the zoning classification to the floor plan* Analysis of the former user costs* Assortment of up to three different modernisation versions* Calculation and comparison of service charges, renovation costs and investment costs* Ecological comparison by reference to primary energy consumption* Summary of all versions and final selection
Institute of Building Structures and Structural Design, University of Stuttgart
SupervisorProf. Dr.-Ing. J. Knippers, Dipl.-Ing. C. Köhler, Dipl.-Ing. M. Hammer, Dr.-Ing. A. Rieck (LAVA)
StudentJulia Heibaum
“Push the envelope”
Approach* The element is based on a combination of the Golden Section and the Penrose Tiling throughout* Additional function of Art in Architecture* Due to the use of bioplastics the module can be produced in any possible colour and pattern to attain an even more vivid appearance than it does only by its shape* Individual layout thanks to several structures
Conceptual FormluationGrowing possibilities in digital design and fabrication result in modern buildings with freeform elements and surfaces. At the same time the concepts of „Green Building“ and „Sustainability“ are getting more and more reflected in architecture and require sustainable structural designs. Design a fassade made of bioplastics that combines sustainability with digital design and fabrication including an additional function to a module that is to form the fassade.
Institute for the Foundations of Planning, University of Stuttgart
SupervisorUniv. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Walter Schönwandt, Dipl.-Ing. Hannes Rockenbauch, Dr.-Ing. Christoph Hemberger, Dipl.-Ing. Mario Schneider, Dipl.-Ing. Sabrina Brenner
StudentsAlma Cokic, Dominic Kiesikof, Julia Heibaum, Benjamin Noll, Rica Rieth
“Project phase Zero”Traffic in Stuttgart
land consumption
cutting
energy consumption
noise
air contamination
crashes
Conceptual FormulationWhat happens before the architect grabs a pen and does the first drawings and designs of a new building? Who plans all the strategies a good space-utilisation schedule or city developement sanction needs? Who verifies if those sanctions are appropriate for the actual planning and who leads the therefore needed complex planning process? And last but not least who trains architects for those challenges?
Approach* Looking at several planning methods showed that constructional measures are not always an answer. Questioning the problem and asking where it came from in the first place is the first of several steps that are necessary to make sure you look at a planning problem from all possible angles* Define the problem and the issues that are part of it *A chain of causation helps to find coherences and ongoing problems which can be summarized to method packages in the end* Those packages can be evaluated concerning effectiveness, efficiency, feasibility, bankability and implementation and hence help finding right solutions for the right problem
Institute for Architectural History, University of Stuttgart
SupervisorProf. Dr. phil. habil. Klaus Jan Philipp
StudentJulia Heibaum
Diploma ThesisThe architecture of the Gentry during the Regency
Conceptual formulationThe architecture of the Gentry during the Regency. A study of Great Britain‘s architecture concerning the rooms of a residence, their role and the resulting sequence by use of the Gamma Analysis.
AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the coherence between the society and the architecture of the late 18th and early 19th century in Great Britain. Hereby the focus lies on the society of the so called Gentry and the Regency of Prince George IV. The segregation of the classes of society being not only noticeable within the social ladder but in the architecture is to be elucidated in this paper. The backgrounds of history as well as society are set out by an overview of the life back in those times whilst the analysis of the floorplans of three townhouses will be exposed by the gamma analysis. The results of the gamma analysis reflect the foregoing elucidations and assumptions to the effect that the servants, though having an important role in the household, are based out of sight of the inhabitants and their whereabouts within the house.
