+ All Categories
Home > Documents > HELE COAL-FIRED POWER GENERATION ROADMAP

HELE COAL-FIRED POWER GENERATION ROADMAP

Date post: 16-Oct-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
HELE COAL-FIRED POWER GENERATION ROADMAP Key findings X In 2011, roughly 50% of new coal-fired power plants used high-efficiency, low-emissions (HELE) technologies, predominantly supercritical (SC) and ultra-supercritical (USC) pulverised coal combustion units. Though the share of HELE technology has almost doubled in the last 10 years, far too many non-HELE, subcritical units are still being constructed. About three-quarters of operating units use non-HELE technology; more than half of current capacity is over 25 years old and comprises units of less than 300 MW. X USC pulverised coal combustion is currently the most efficient HELE technology: some units reach efficiency of 45% (LHV, net), reducing global average emissions to 740 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt hour (gCO 2 /kWh). Efforts to develop advanced USC technology could lower emissions to 670 gCO 2 /kWh (a 30% improvement). Deployment of advanced USC is expected within the next 10 to 15 years. X To raise its efficiency, integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) needs to operate with gas turbines that allow higher turbine inlet temperatures. IGCC with 1 500°C-class gas turbines (currently under development) should be able to raise efficiency well above 45%, bringing CO 2 emissions down towards 670 gCO 2 /kWh – and less for IGCC units with more advanced gas turbines. X To achieve CO 2 intensity factors that are consistent with halving CO 2 emissions by 2050, deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) is essential. CCS offers the potential to reduce CO 2 emissions to less than 100 g/kWh. Programmes to demonstrate large-scale, integrated CCS on coal-fired power units are under way in many countries. Some deployment of CCS is anticipated in the 2020s, with broader deployment projected from 2030-35 onwards. X HELE technologies need to be further developed as: n inefficient power generation from low-cost, poor quality coal is currently being used by many countries; n though trials have demonstrated the potential to reduce emissions by co-firing biomass, the practice is not widespread; and n operating coal-fired power plants consume copious quantities of water, a cause of major concern in arid regions and regions where water resources issues are gaining prominence. X Non-greenhouse gas pollutants can cause severe health issues and often harm local infrastructure and, consequently, the local economy. Though technologies are available for reducing their emissions, not all countries yet deploy them effectively. can cause severe health issues and often harm local infrastructure and, consequently, the local economy. © OECD/IEA, 2012 HELE coal-fired power generation roadmap milestones 2050 2030 2010 2040 2020 International Energy Agency www.iea.org/roadmaps Global electricity generation from coal (TWh) 10 000 9 000 8 000 7 000 6 000 5 000 4 000 3 000 2 000 1 000 0 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2045 2040 2050 Decrease generation from subcritical plants Install CCS on plants deploying HELE technology Increase generation from plants deploying HELE technology Supercritical IGCC USC Subcritical HELE technologies + CCS Actions for reducing CO 2 Projected electricity generation from coal-fired power generation technologies in IEA ETP 2°C Scenario PC combustion Hard coal Deploy more supercritical and USC plants. Continue R&D on A-USC. Deploy more USC plants. Demonstrate A-USC. Test A-USC with post- combustion CO 2 capture at pilot scale. Test oxy-fuel A-USC at pilot scale. Deploy A-USC. Demonstrate oxy-fuel A-USC. Deploy A-USC with integrated CCS. Deploy oxy-fuel A-USC. Brown coal Deploy more SC and demonstrate USC plants. Demonstrate lignite drying on full-scale power plant. Deploy lignite drying on full-scale power plant. Deploy USC plants. Demonstrate A-USC with partial CO 2 capture. Deploy USC with 100% fuel drying. Demonstrate A-USC with full-flow dry feed boiler. Demonstrate A-USC with full-flow CO 2 capture. Deploy A-USC incorporating drying with full CCS. IGCC Deploy units with 1 400°C to 1 500°C gas turbines. Improve availability and performance with low-grade coals. Test at pilot scale dry gas cleaning and non- cryogenic provision of oxygen. Develop gas turbines with turbine inlet temperatures over 1 500°C. Deploy units with 1 600°C gas turbines for high hydrogen fuel for CCS capability. Support R&D for dry syngas cleaning. Some non-cryogenic oxygen application. Deploy units with 1 700°C gas turbines for high hydrogen fuel for CCS capability. Further application of non- cryogenic oxygen. Deploy units with 1 700°C+ gas turbines for high hydrogen fuel with full CCS. Deploy non-cryogenic oxygen option. CFBC Deploy supercritical and demonstrate USC CFBC boilers. Deploy USC CFBC. Demonstrate A-USC CFBC. Test A-USC oxy- fuel at pilot scale. Initial deployment of A-USC. Deploy A-USC CFBC with full CCS; both post-combustion capture and oxy-fuel. Non-GHG emissions SO 2 PC = <20 mg/m 3 ; limestone/gypsum FGD IGCC = <20 mg/m 3 for wet scrubbing; dry methods are under development CFBC = <50 mg/m 3 <10 mg/m 3 for PC, IGCC and CFBC. PM = particulate matter FGD = flue gas desulphurisation SCR = selective catalytic reduction ESP = electrostatic precipitator NO x PC = 50 to 100 mg/m 3 ; combustion measures (i.e. low-NO x burners and air staging) plus SCR IGCC = <30 mg/m 3 ; SCR will allow lower levels CFBC = <200 mg/m 3 <10 mg/m 3 for PC, IGCC and CFBC. PM PC = <5-10 mg/m 3 , even with ESPs, IGCC = <1 mg/m 3 , CFBC = <50 mg/m 3 , with ESP and fabric filters <1 mg/m 3 for PC and CFBC / 0.1 mg/m 3 for IGCC.
Transcript
Page 1: HELE COAL-FIRED POWER GENERATION ROADMAP

HELE COAL-FIRED POWER GENERATION ROADMAP

Key findings

X In 2011, roughly 50% of new coal-fired power plants used high-efficiency, low-emissions (HELE) technologies, predominantly supercritical (SC) and ultra-supercritical (USC) pulverised coal combustion units. Though the share of HELE technology has almost doubled in the last 10 years, far too many non-HELE, subcritical units are still being constructed. About three-quarters of operating units use non-HELE technology; more than half of current capacity is over 25 years old and comprises units of less than 300 MW.

X USC pulverised coal combustion is currently the most efficient HELE technology: some units reach efficiency of 45% (LHV, net), reducing global average emissions to 740 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt hour (gCO2/ kWh). Efforts to develop advanced USC technology could lower emissions to 670 gCO2/kWh (a 30% improvement). Deployment of advanced USC is expected within the next 10 to 15 years.

X To raise its efficiency, integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) needs to operate with gas turbines that allow higher turbine inlet temperatures. IGCC with 1 500°C-class gas turbines (currently under development) should be able to raise efficiency well above 45%, bringing CO2 emissions down towards 670 gCO2/kWh – and less for IGCC units with more advanced gas turbines.

X To achieve CO2 intensity factors that are consistent with halving CO2 emissions by 2050, deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) is essential. CCS offers the potential to reduce CO2 emissions to less than 100 g/ kWh. Programmes to demonstrate large-scale, integrated CCS on coal-fired power units are under way in many countries. Some deployment of CCS is anticipated in the 2020s, with broader deployment projected from 2030-35 onwards.

X HELE technologies need to be further developed as:n inefficient power generation from low-cost, poor quality coal is currently being used by

many countries;n though trials have demonstrated the potential to reduce emissions by co-firing biomass,

the practice is not widespread; andn operating coal-fired power plants consume copious quantities of water, a cause of major

concern in arid regions and regions where water resources issues are gaining prominence.

X Non-greenhouse gas pollutants can cause severe health issues and often harm local infrastructure and, consequently, the local economy. Though technologies are available for reducing their emissions, not all countries yet deploy them effectively. can cause severe health issues and often harm local infrastructure and, consequently, the local economy.

© O

ECD

/IEA

, 201

2

HELE coal-fired power generation roadmap milestones

205020302010 20402020

International Energy Agency www.iea.org/roadmaps

Glo

balele

ctri

city

gen

era

tio

nfr

om

coal(T

Wh

)

10 000

9 000

8 000

7 000

6 000

5 000

4 000

3 000

2 000

1 000

02010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 20452040 2050

Decrease generation from subcritical plants

Install CCS on plants deploying HELE technology

Increase generation from plants deploying HELE technology

Supercritical

IGCC

USC

Subcritical

HELE technologies + CCS

Actions forreducing CO2

Projected electricity generation from coal-fired power generation technologies in IEA ETP 2°C Scenario

PC

co

mb

ust

ion

Har

d

coal

Deploy more supercritical and USC plants. Continue

R&D on A-USC.

Deploy more USC plants.

Demonstrate A-USC.

Test A-USC with post-

combustion CO2 capture

at pilot scale. Test oxy-fuel

A-USC at pilot scale.

Deploy A-USC.

Demonstrate oxy-fuel

A-USC.

Deploy A-USC with integrated CCS. Deploy oxy-fuel A-USC.

Bro

wn

co

al Deploy more SC and demonstrate USC plants.

Demonstrate lignite drying on full-scale power plant.

Deploy lignite drying on

full-scale power plant.

Deploy USC plants.

Demonstrate A-USC with

partial CO2 capture.

Deploy USC with 100%

fuel drying. Demonstrate

A-USC with full-flow dry

feed boiler. Demonstrate

A-USC with full-flow CO2

capture.

Deploy A-USC incorporating drying with full CCS.

IGC

C

Deploy units with 1 400°C to 1 500°C gas turbines.

Improve availability and performance with low-grade

coals. Test at pilot scale dry gas cleaning and non-

cryogenic provision of oxygen. Develop gas turbines

with turbine inlet temperatures over 1 500°C.

Deploy units with 1 600°C

gas turbines for high

hydrogen fuel for CCS

capability. Support R&D

for dry syngas cleaning.

Some non-cryogenic

oxygen application.

Deploy units with 1

700°C gas turbines for

high hydrogen fuel for

CCS capability. Further

application of non-

cryogenic oxygen.

Deploy units with 1 700°C+ gas turbines for high hydrogen fuel with full CCS. Deploy non-cryogenic oxygen option.

CFB

C

Deploy supercritical and demonstrate USC CFBC

boilers.Deploy USC CFBC.

Demonstrate A-USC

CFBC. Test A-USC oxy-

fuel at pilot scale. Initial

deployment of A-USC.

Deploy A-USC CFBC with full CCS; both post-combustion capture and oxy-fuel.

No

n-G

HG

em

issi

on

s

SO2 PC = <20 mg/m

3; limestone/gypsum FGD

IGCC = <20 mg/m3 for wet scrubbing; dry methods are under development

CFBC = <50 mg/m3

<10 mg/m3 for PC, IGCC

and CFBC.

PM = particulate matter

FGD = flue gas desulphurisation

SCR = selective catalytic reduction

ESP = electrostatic precipitator

NO

x

PC = 50 to 100 mg/m3; combustion measures (i.e. low-NOx burners and air staging)

plus SCR

IGCC = <30 mg/m3; SCR will allow lower levels

CFBC = <200 mg/m3

<10 mg/m3 for PC, IGCC

and CFBC.

PM

PC = <5-10 mg/m3, even with ESPs,

IGCC = <1 mg/m3,

CFBC = <50 mg/m3, with ESP and fabric filters

<1 mg/m3 for PC and

CFBC / 0.1 mg/m3 for

IGCC.

Page 2: HELE COAL-FIRED POWER GENERATION ROADMAP

Energy Technology Perspectives

0

0

50

40

20

100

60

150

80

200

100

250

120

2010

2010

2020

2020

2030

2030

2040

2040

2050

2050

OECD Europe

South Africa 0

100

200

300

400

500

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

ASEAN

0

500

1 000

1 500

2 000

2 500

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

China

0

400

200

600

800

1 000

1 200

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

India

0

250

200

300

350

400

450

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

OECD Asia-Oceania

150

100

50

0

500

400

300

200

100

600

700

800

900

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

OECD Americas

0

120

100

20

80

60

40

140

160

180

200

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Eastern Europe/EurasiaHELE + CCS

HELE

This map is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.

Key actions over the next 10 years Regional outlook from HELE coal-fired power generation

www.iea.org/roadmaps

Electricity generation (TWh) from HELE coal-fired power generation in IEA ETP 2°C Scenario

X Increase – by about 4 percentage points – the average efficiency of coal-fired power generation plants. This implies substantially reducing generation from older, inefficient plants, improving the performance of operational plants, and installing new, highly efficient, state-of-the-art plants.

X Deploy, at minimum, supercritical technology on all new combustion installations producing over 300 MWe and avoid installation of smaller sized units (on which it is impractical to apply supercritical conditions) where possible.

X Provide funding and support mechanisms for research, development, demonstration and deployment (RDD&D) to enable the timely deployment of next-generation technologies, in particular to:

n demonstrate advanced combustion and gasification technologies;

n demonstrate the integration of CO2 capture with state-of-the-art combustion and gasification technologies;

n improve the efficiency of generation from indigenous, low-cost, low-quality coal; and

n reduce the water consumption of HELE technologies, while maintaining their performance.

X Develop and deploy – possibly through mandatory policies – efficient and cost-effective flue-gas treatment to limit non-GHG emissions. Initiate or improve pollutant monitoring, promoting joint responsibility on the part of the users and the appropriate authority to verify full compliance with legislation and to ensure the technology applied is meeting its potential.

ASEAN 6°C Scenario 2°C Scenario2015 2020 2030 2050 2015 2020 2030 2050

HELE capacity w/o CCS (GW) 1 1 9 99 7 13 13 33

HELE capacity with CCS (GW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 25

Share of HELE capacity 1% 1% 7% 42% 13% 21% 30% 64%

OECD Europe 6°C Scenario 2°C Scenario

2015 2020 2030 2050 2015 2020 2030 2050HELE capacity w/o CCS (GW) 40 47 71 129 39 40 11 0

HELE capacity with CCS (GW) 0 1 4 8 1 4 26 40

Share of HELE capacity 20% 24% 41% 85% 20% 22% 35% 90%

China 6°C Scenario 2°C Scenario

2015 2020 2030 2050 2015 2020 2030 2050HELE capacity w/o CCS (GW) 237 254 483 1 209 232 243 226 39

HELE capacity with CCS (GW) 0 0 0 0 0 2 97 344

Share of HELE capacity 29% 26% 38% 66% 32% 33% 45% 70%

United States 6°C Scenario 2°C Scenario

2015 2020 2030 2050 2015 2020 2030 2050HELE capacity w/o CCS (GW) 97 97 184 340 97 97 78 0

HELE capacity with CCS (GW) 0 0 0 0 1 3 44 111

Share of HELE capacity 28% 27% 49% 81% 29% 31% 55% 100%

Eastern Europe/Eurasia

6°C Scenario 2°C Scenario

2015 2020 2030 2050 2015 2020 2030 2050HELE capacity w/o CCS (GW) 40 46 55 88 36 34 4 0

HELE capacity with CCS (GW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 20

Share of HELE capacity 35% 33% 25% 29% 38% 38% 38% 62%

Other OECD North America

6°C Scenario 2°C Scenario

2015 2020 2030 2050 2015 2020 2030 2050HELE capacity w/o CCS (GW) 2 2 7 24 2 2 1 0

HELE capacity with CCS (GW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8

Share of HELE capacity 8% 8% 20% 60% 7% 9% 50% 100%

India 6°C Scenario 2°C Scenario

2015 2020 2030 2050 2015 2020 2030 2050HELE capacity w/o CCS (GW) 23 23 109 404 23 23 109 81

HELE capacity with CCS (GW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 81

Share of HELE capacity 13% 12% 39% 80% 14% 16% 50% 88%

South Africa 6°C Scenario 2°C Scenario

2015 2020 2030 2050 2015 2020 2030 2050HELE capacity w/o CCS (GW) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0

HELE capacity with CCS (GW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 15

Share of HELE capacity 11% 11% 10% 8% 11% 11% 27% 100%

OECD Asia Oceania

6°C Scenario 2°C Scenario

2015 2020 2030 2050 2015 2020 2030 2050HELE capacity w/o CCS (GW) 60 66 81 127 58 60 27 6

HELE capacity with CCS (GW) 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 16

Share of HELE capacity 54% 56% 63% 90% 53% 56% 80% 99%

World 6°C Scenario 2°C Scenario

2015 2020 2030 2050 2015 2020 2030 2050HELE capacity w/o CCS (GW) 519 560 1 026 2 509 510 530 480 160

HELE capacity with CCS (GW) 0 1 4 8 3 12 215 664

Share of HELE capacity 27% 26% 39% 68% 28% 30% 46% 78%

Note: HELE capacity is a total of plants with the efficiencies over supercritical. Share of HELE capacity corresponds to the ratio of HELE capacity in total coal-fired power plants.


Recommended