+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Hepatitis B Virus therapy - Virology...

Hepatitis B Virus therapy - Virology...

Date post: 10-Nov-2018
Category:
Upload: dodieu
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
39
Hepatitis B Virus therapy Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain
Transcript
  • Hepatitis B Virus therapy

    Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

  • Disclosures

    Advisor: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis

    Lecturer: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis

    Clinical trials: Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche

  • Immune tolerance Immune active Immune control HBeAg Anti-HBe

    HBV DNA log10 IU/ml

    ALT (U/L)

    HBeAg or anti-HBe

    HBsAg log10 IU/ml

    5 4 3 2

    500

    100 20

    Natural history of CHB

    Janssen, et al. Gut 2012

    Treatment indicated

    Grafiek1

    8

    8

    8

    8

    8

    8

    8

    8

    6

    7

    5

    7

    6

    8

    5

    6

    7

    5

    4

    5

    2.5

    2.5

    2.5

    2.5

    2.5

    2.5

    2.5

    2.5

    2.5

    Sheet1

    888888886757685675452.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.5

    2.54656453643

    Grafiek1

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    90

    80

    55

    50

    45

    35

    25

    30

    20

    15

    10

    8

    5

    4

    4

    2.5

    2.5

    2.5

    2.5

    2

    2

    1.5

    1.5

    Sheet1

    100100100100100100908055504535253020151085442.52.52.52.5221.51.5

    3587131017121698

    Grafiek1

    30

    30

    30

    30

    30

    30

    30

    30

    120

    20

    350

    250

    300

    180

    320

    100

    200

    30

    180

    30

    30

    30

    30

    30

    30

    30

    30

    30

    30

    Sheet1

    3030303030303030120203502503001803201002003018030303030303030303030

    309012010015012017015020014090

  • Liaw Y-F, et al. Hepatol Int 2012;11:163645 ALT: alanine aminotransferase; HBV: hepatitis B virus

    Treatment indicated Chronic hepatitis

    ALT elevated HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL Fibrosis

    Cirrhosis Decompensated cirrhosis

    Treatment not indicated Immune tolerant HBV HBV carrier state

    Chronic hepatitis B infection

  • What can be achieved now

    In immune tolerant patients

    In patients with CHB and cirrhosis

    In decompensated patients

    CHB: chronic hepatitis B

  • Long-term follow-up of immune tolerant patients

    Consecutive immune tolerant patients HBsAg- and HBeAg- for

    > 6 months Normal ALT levels on

    3 consecutive readings over 6 months

    HBV DNA >107 copies/mL 57 patients followed up

    for 5 years 84% of patients remained

    immune tolerant at Year 5 No HCC

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    F0 F1 F2

    BaselinebiopsyBiopsy at5 years

    Hui CK, et al. Hepatology 2007;46:395401 HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen;

    HBeAg: hepatitis B e antigen; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma

    Pat

    ient

    s (%

    )

  • What can be achieved now in immune tolerant patients?

    Chan HL, et al. Gastroenterology 2014;146:12408 FTC/TDF and FTC are investigational agents and not licensed for use in CHB; TDF: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; FTC: emtricitabine; UNL: upper normal limit

    HBV DNA 108 copies/mL ALT ULN

    (N=126)

    Randomised to TDF for 192 weeks

    (n=64)

    Completed study through Week 192

    (n=54; 87%)

    Randomised to FTC/TDF for 192 weeks

    (n=62)

    Completed study through Week 192

    (n=53; 83%)

    Discontinued treatment before Week 192

    (n=11; 17%)

    Discontinued treatment before Week 192

    (n=8; 13%)

    TDF and FTC/TDF in patients with normal ALT and high HBV DNA Phase 2, randomised, double-blind study in HBeAg-positive patients

  • HBV DNA suppression in immune tolerant patients

    Chan HL, et al. Gastroenterology 2014;146:12408

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    0 0 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160 176 192

    Study week

    Pat

    ient

    s (%

    )

    FTC/TDF 76%

    TDF 55%

    6% TDF patients and 2% TDF/FTC achieved HBeAg loss 5% TDF patients and 0% TDF/FTC achieved HBeAg seroconversion There were no cases of HBsAg loss/seroconversion No patients developed HCC or clinical events

  • What can be achieved now?

    In immune tolerant patients

    In patients with CHB and cirrhosis

    In decompensated patients

  • Liaw Y-F, et al. Hepatol Int 2012;11:163645

    Treatment indicated Chronic hepatitis

    ALT elevated HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL Fibrosis

    Cirrhosis Decompensated cirrhosis

    Treatment not indicated Immune tolerant HBV HBV carrier state

    Chronic hepatitis B infection

  • Approved Agents used to Treat HBV

    Lamivudine

    Telbivudine

    Entecavir

    Adefovir

    Interferon alpha-2a

    Peginterferon alpha-2b

    Tenofovir

    Chart1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2007

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Year

    Number of FDA-Approved Agents

    Sheet1

    19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011

    Number of FDA-Approved Agents0000000000000000000

  • Therapeutic strategies for chronic hepatitis B

    Short-term "curative" treatment

    Years

    HBV DNA < 2000 IU/ml ALT < UNL (anti-HBe)

    On treatment response

    HBsAg Loss

    Follow-up (mo/yrs) IFN

    Long-term "suppressive" treatment

    HBV DNA undetectable by PCR (

  • Therapeutic Strategies for Chronic Hepatitis B

  • Peginterferon alfa-2a versus Lamivudine Alone or in Combination in HBeAg-Positive Patients

    HBeAg-POSITIVE Patients: Week 72 Treatment Response

    Lau GKK, et. al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2682-95.

    P < 0.001

    P < 0.001

    P = 0.006

    P = 0.002

    P = 0.02

    P < 0.001

    Chart1

    0.140.140.05

    0.410.390.28

    0.320.270.19

    Peg-INF alfa-2a

    Peg-INF alfa-2a + Lamivudine

    Lamivudine

    Patients (%)

    Sheet1

    Peg-INF alfa-2aPeg-INF alfa-2a + LamivudineLamivudine

    HBV DNA < 400 copies/ml14%14%5%

    ALT Normalization41%39%28%

    HBeAg Seroconversion32%27%19%

  • Peginterferon alfa-2a versus Lamivudine Alone or in Combination in HBeAg-Negative Patients

    HBeAg-NEGATIVE Patients: Week 72 Treatment Response

    Marcellin P, et. al. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1206-7.

    P=0.007

    P=0.003 P=0.849

    P=0.004

    P=0.003 P=0.915

    Chart1

    0.430.440.29

    0.590.60.44

    Peg-INF alfa-2a

    Peg-INF alfa-2a + Lamivudine

    Lamivudine

    Patients (%)

    Sheet1

    Peg-INF alfa-2aPeg-INF alfa-2a + LamivudineLamivudine

    HBV DNA < 20,000 copies/ml43%44%29%

    ALT Normalization59%60%44%

  • Impact of (peg)-IFN therapy on CHB

    Safety profile well known

    Progression to cirrhosis prevented

    Clinical decompensation prevented

    HCC reduced (?)

    Improved patient survival

    Immune control status in 30% of patients

  • How can we improve PEG-IFN efficacy ?

    pretreament predictors of response High ALT levels

    Low levels HBV DNA

    Genotype A

    Young people

    on-treatment predictors of response

  • Response-guided therapy (RGT) using HBsAg levels in Peg-IFN-treated patients:

    to identify non responders

    Week 12:

    - No decline of HBsAg (A,D) - HBsAg >20,000 IU/mL (B,C)

    Week 24:

    - HBsAg >20,000 IU/ml (A,B,C,D)

    Week 12:

    - No decline in HBsAg +

  • Response-guided therapy by HBsAg levels in Peg-IFN-treated patients: to identify non

    responders

    Week 12:

    - No decline of HBsAg (A,D) - HBsAg >20,000 IU/mL (B,C)

    Week 24:

    - HBsAg >20,000 IU/ml (A,B,C,D)

    Week 12:

    - No decline in HBsAg +

  • Therapeutic Strategies for Chronic Hepatitis B

  • High virological responses with long-term ETV or TDF

    Response

    ETV TDF

    HBeAg+ patients Year 51

    HBeAg- patients Year 32,a

    HBeAg+ patients Year 83

    HBeAg- patients Year 83

    HBV DNA suppressionb 94% (88/94) 95%

    (54/57) 98%

    (159/160) 99%

    (271/273)

    Resistance 1% (n=1) NR 0% 0%

    HBsAg loss (seroconversion) NR NR

    12.9% (10.3%)

    1.1% (

  • 91 94 100 100

    88 95 91

    100

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Week 48 Week 96 Week 144 Week 192

    % P

    atie

    nts

    with

    VR

    , H

    BV

    DN

    A <

    69 IU

    /mL

    TN TE

    CIBERHEP: Efficacy of TDF in Treatment nave and Treatment Experienced patients

    74 84 86

    100

    74 82 85

    100

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Week 48 Week 96 Week 144 Week 192

    % P

    atie

    nts

    with

    VR

    , H

    BV

    DN

    A <

    69 IU

    /mL

    Tabernero D. EASL 2014; Poster 1058 TE: treatment experienced; TN: treatment nave

    Viral suppression was similar between TN and TE patients, with HBeAg loss

    occurring more in TN patients

    HBsAg loss: n=4 (1 HBsAg seroconversion)

    HBeAg-negative HBeAg-positive

    23 19

    TN, N TE, N

    19 17

    14 13

    3 8

    65 48

    TN, N TE, N

    50 40

    26 33

    13 25

    Patients (N=370) from 48 Spanish centres treated for 12295 weeks

    0 48 96 144 192 0

    30

    60

    90

    120

    150

    180

    210

    MD

    RD

    (ml/m

    in/1

    .73m

    2 )

    Week

  • VIREAL study: high rates of virological response, regardless of age Subgroup (n=48) of elderly patients (65 years)

    Incidence of comorbidities in elderly patients: 35% hypertension 17% diabetes 58% F3F4 (METAVIR) at baseline

    Causse X. EASL 2014; Poster 1062

    TDF has not been studied in patients >65 years. As elderly patients are more likely to have decreased renal function, caution is required

    in these patients (Viread SmPC, March 2014)

    Patie

    nts

    with

    HBV

    DN

    A

  • Liver fibrosis regression and cirrhosis reversal over 5 years of treatment with TDF

    N=348 had biopsies at baseline and Year 5 (96 with cirrhosis)

    Marcellin P, et al. Lancet 2013;381:46875 Histologically evaluable patients in the

    long-term histology cohort

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Baseline Year 1 Year 5

    Missing6543210

    Pat

    ient

    s (%

    )

    P

  • Characteristics of patients shown to be associated with reversal of cirrhosis with TDF

    Marcellin P, et al. Lancet 2013;381:46875 BMI: body mass index; SD: standard deviation

    Characteristic No cirrhosis at Year 5 (n=71)

    Cirrhosis at Year 5 (n=25)

    P value

    Mean BMI at baseline, kg/m2 (SD)

    25.7 (3.7) 29.0 (4.4) 0.0007

    BMI (kg/m2) at baseline, %

  • Japanese cohorts: significantly reduced HCC incidence with ETV compared with controls

    in cirrhotic patients

    Hosaka T, et al. Hepatology 2013;58:98107 LAM: lamivudine

    Control ETV LAM

    HCC

    79 49 85

    79 49 85

    72 41 76

    17 29 47

    ETV LAM

    Control

    Treatment duration (years)

    Cum

    ulat

    ive

    HC

    C ra

    te (%

    )

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    0

    20

    30

    40

    50

    10

    No. at risk 53 35 65

    35 32 64

    Control

    LAM

    11.4%

    20.9%

    2.6%

    28.5%

    4.3%

    19.7%

    7.0%

    6

    ETV 7.0%

    22.2%

    38.9%

    4.8%

    12.2%

    Cirrhotics Log-rank test:

    ETV vs LAM: P=0.043 ETV vs control: P

  • Lower risk of death/transplantation with ETV than with LAM

    Death or transplantation HCC

    Lim Y-S, et al. Gastroenterology 2014:doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.02.033

    1792 1792

    1778 1777

    1740 1436

    1660 966

    1601 563

    1531 224

    LAM ETV

    No. at risk

    Est

    imat

    ed c

    umul

    ativ

    e in

    cide

    nce

    of

    dea

    th o

    r tra

    nspl

    anta

    tion

    (%)

    0 1 3 5 2 4 6

    0

    40

    60

    80

    100

    20

    Years after starting treatment

    1389 21

    P

  • When to stop NA therapy?

    EASL 2012 guidelines

    HBeAg positive

    A) Confirmed anti-HBe seroconversion (and undetectable HBV DNA) after at least 12 months of consolidation* B) Confirmed HBsAg loss and anti-HBs seroconversion

    HBeAg negative Confirmed HBsAg loss and anti-HBs seroconversion

    Cirrhotics Confirmed HBsAg loss and anti-HBs seroconversion

    Adapted from EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Hepatol 2012;57:16785

    *A proportion of patients who discontinue nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy after anti-HBe seroconversion may require retreatment,

    since they fail to sustain their serological and/or virological response; HBeAg: hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen

  • Off-therapy durability of response to ETV in HBeAg-negative CHB from Taiwan

    95 patients (39 cirrhotic) treated with ETV for 24 (1359) months

    Stopping rule: undetectable HBV DNA on 3 occasions at least 6 months apart

    Response after treatment discontinuation compared with LAM or LdT from historical data

    Cumulative relapse rates in Year 1: Virological relapse: 58% Clinical relapse: 45%

    No good predictors of relapse

    Jeng WJ, et al. Hepatology 2013;58:188896

    0 90 180 270 360 Time to relapse (days)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Off

    ther

    apy

    cum

    ulat

    ive

    rela

    pse

    (%)

    LAM or LdT

    P=0.027

    ETV

  • HBsAg loss

    qHBsAg predicts HBsAg loss and HBV relapse after LAM discontinuation in HBeAg -ve

    Chen CH, et al. J Hepatol 2014; doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2014.04.029 (epub ahead of print)

    *Defined as serum HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL in 2 measurements at least 3 months apart

    HBsAg 1201000 IU/mL 60

    40

    20

    0

    0 52 104 156 208 260 312 364 C

    umul

    ativ

    e in

    cide

    nce

    of H

    BsA

    g lo

    ss

    Duration of follow-up (weeks)

    HBsAg

  • Stopping TDF After Long-Term Virologic Suppression in

    HBeAg-Negative CHB

    32

    FINITE CHB, a randomized study in non cirrhotic HBeAg-ve patients with 4 yrs TDF therapy and undetectable HBV DNA

    Randomized N=45

    Withdrew consent n=3

    Week 48 TDF-Restart

    n=3

    Week 48 TDF-Stop

    n=18

    Week 48 TDF-Continue

    n=21

    TDF-Stop n=21

    TDF-Continue n=21

    86% of TDF-Stop subjects did not restart TDF by Week 48

    Berg, EASL, 2015, O119

  • 33

    TDF-Stop: HBsAg loss, HBV DNA, ALT, TDF-Restart

    FINITE CHB study 48 weeks outcome after therapy discontinuation

    5%

    24%

    10%

    10%

    52% 48%

    38%

    10%

    5%

    57%

    19%

    14%

    10%

    Berg, EASL, 2015, O119

    Grfico1

    9.52380952389.523809523823.80952380954.761904761952.3809523810

    9.5238095238038.0952380952047.6190476194.7619047619

    14.2857142857019.0476190476057.14285714299.5238095238

    TDF-Restart

    HBV DNA >2000, ALT >2 x ULN

    HBV DNA >2000, ALT 2000, ALT 2000, ALT

  • 34

    * TDF-Restart

    -1 1 3 5HBsAg (log10 reduction)

    -1 1 3 5HBsAg (log10 reduction)

    TDF-Stop (n=21) TDF-Continue (n=20)

    *

    *

    *

    HBsAg Log10 Reduction: Median 0.283 Mean 0.773 HBsAg loss n=2

    HBsAg Log10 Reduction: Median 0.088 Mean 0.109 HBsAg loss n=0

    Week 48 HBsAg log10 Reduction (Individual Patients)

    FINITE CHB. HBsAg levels between Patients who

    TDF stopped and those who TDF continued

    Stopping TDF was associated with a more profound decline in HBsAg levels compared to continuous TDF

    HBsAg loss HBsAg loss

    Berg, EASL, 2015, O119

  • HBsAg Clearance After Addition of PegIFN for 48 Weeks in HBeAg-Negative CHB Patients on NUCs

    35 Bourliere, EASL, 2015, O112

    Multicenter, randomized, controlled study in 183 patients with documented undetectable HBV DNA while on NUCs for at least 1 year

    ANRS-HB06 PEGAN Study

    NUC alone (n=93)

    NUC + PegIFN

    Wk 0 Wk 144

    HBeAg- undetectable HBV DNA

    on NUCs (n=183)

    Wk 96 Wk 48

    NUCs Alone N=93

    PegIFN + NUCs N=90 P-value

    HBsAg loss (Week 48, %) 0 (0) 7 (8) 0.0057 HBsAg loss (Week 96, %) (1 endpoint) 3 (3) 7 (8) 0.1521

    HBs seroconversion (Week 96, %) 1 (1) 6 (7) 0.0465

    NUC alone (n=90)

    Patients receiving add-on PegIFN experienced higher HBsAg loss than NUC monotherapy at W48, but without statistical difference at W96

  • HBsAg loss with TDF plus PEG in chronic hepatitis B (CHB): Results of a global randomized controlled trial at week 72

    Start TDF during follow-up if prespecified safety criteria met

    0 48 120 72

    TDF + PEG

    TDF+PEG TDF

    24

    n=186

    n=184

    n=185

    n=185 PEG

    16

    TDF

    Week

    from Asian No cirrhosis and bridging fibrosis were excluded

    HBsAg HBeAg Loss Loss 9% 29% 2.8% 25% 0% 15% 2.8% 25%

    Marcellin P, et al. AASLD 2014

  • 37

    Baseline and On-Treatment Predictors of HBsAg Loss at Week 72

    Univariate

    P-value Multivariate

    P-value Hazard ratio Multivariate

    Baseline Predictors

    Genotype A vs B 0.024

  • Study 149.-On-Treatment Predictors of HBsAg Loss at Week 72

    38 Chan, EASL, 2015, O117

    Sensitivity Specificity Positive

    Predictive Value

    Negative Predictive

    Value

    HBsAg decline from baseline > 1 log10 at Week 12

    71% 92% 43% 97%

    TDF + PegIFN 48 wk

    High negative predictive values are seen among patients treated with TDF + PegIFN combination if they have:

    HBsAg decline < 1 log10 IU/mL at Week 12

  • What can be achieved now?

    High rates of virological response with low/no risk of resistance

    Histological improvement

    Stop progression of disease (decompensation) and reduced liver transplant

    Reduced risk of HCC

    ?

    Hepatitis B Virus therapyDisclosuresSlide Number 3Slide Number 4What can be achieved nowLong-term follow-up of immune tolerant patientsWhat can be achieved now inimmune tolerant patients?HBV DNA suppression inimmune tolerant patientsWhat can be achieved now?Slide Number 10Approved Agents used to Treat HBVSlide Number 12Therapeutic Strategies for Chronic Hepatitis BPeginterferon alfa-2a versus Lamivudine Alone or in Combination in HBeAg-Positive PatientsPeginterferon alfa-2a versus Lamivudine Alone or in Combination in HBeAg-Negative PatientsSlide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Therapeutic Strategies for Chronic Hepatitis BHigh virological responses withlong-term ETV or TDFCIBERHEP: Efficacy of TDF in Treatment nave and Treatment Experienced patientsVIREAL study: high rates of virological response, regardless of ageLiver fibrosis regression and cirrhosis reversal over 5 years of treatment with TDFCharacteristics of patients shown to be associated with reversal of cirrhosis with TDFRisk of HCC is predicted to be decreased with long-term therapyJapanese cohorts: significantly reduced HCC incidence with ETV compared with controlsin cirrhotic patientsLower risk of death/transplantation with ETV than with LAMWhen to stop NA therapy?Off-therapy durability of response toETV in HBeAg-negative CHB from TaiwanqHBsAg predicts HBsAg loss andHBV relapse after LAM discontinuation in HBeAg -veStopping TDF After Long-Term Virologic Suppression in HBeAg-Negative CHBSlide Number 33Slide Number 34HBsAg Clearance After Addition of PegIFN for 48 Weeks in HBeAg-Negative CHB Patients on NUCsHBsAg loss with TDF plus PEG in chronic hepatitis B (CHB): Results of a global randomized controlled trial at week 72Slide Number 37Slide Number 38What can be achieved now?


Recommended