Date post: | 13-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | mike-roberts |
View: | 102 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Does Heritage Work as a Tool for Community Well-being? Michael Roberts RPA, Certified Trainer of the Happiness initiative, Chair Sustainability
Commission Groton MA.
Presented at the 2014 conference on Heritage and Healthy Societies, Under the auspices of the UMASS Amherst
Center for Heritage and Society and The University of Kent Centre for Heritage.
Sidney Hyman. “Empire for Liberty”
In With Heritage So Rich (1966)
Does Heritage Work as a Tool for Community Well-being? Well, the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts believes it does, since Historic Preservation is one of the three main pillars of the
Community Preservation Act. Necessary to preserve the essence of our communities as we step
into the 21st Century. In 1966 The Congress found and declared that-
(1) the spirit and direction of the Nation are founded upon and reflected in its historic heritage;
(2) the historical and cultural foundations of the Nation should be preserved as a living part of
our community life and development in order to give a sense of orientation to the American
people. And I have seen it demonstrated over most of the 40 years I have been a Heritage
Management Professional.
So, just what are we talking about? Cultural heritage is the legacy of physical artifacts and
intangible attributes of a group or society that are inherited from past generations, maintained in
the present and bestowed for the benefit of future generations. Cultural heritage
includes tangible culture (such as buildings, monuments, landscapes, archaeological sites,
books, maps, works of art, and artifacts), intangible culture or living heritage which is the
mainspring of humanity's cultural diversity and its maintenance a guarantee for continuing
creativity. Which includes folklore, traditions, language, and knowledge and then natural
heritage (including culturally significant landscapes, and biodiversity). Cultural and natural
heritage is unique and irreplaceable, which places the responsibility of preservation on the
current generation in order for it to be useful to today’s communities seeking well-being. Of
these three categories of cultural heritage the least understood and most overlooked is intangible
cultural heritage which attempts to preserve cultural heritage 'with' the people or community by
protecting the processes that allow traditions and shared knowledge to be passed on. In my mind
THIS is the category which contributes the most to a communities’ well-being.
Well-being is the current iteration of a number of terms the first of which was introduced by the
King of Bhutan who called it “happiness”. He obtained the concept from Thomas Jefferson
when he wrote about one of the unalienable rights of man as “the pursuit of happiness” in the
Declaration of Independence which has been translated most recently as “satisfaction with life”.
The new discipline of Positive Psychology has led the charge in using the phrase well-being but
the internet, Facebook and Twitter are alive with heated and not so heated debate on the subject.
I believe this is a waste of time so long as we can all agree that “satisfaction with life” is the
goal. The Happiness Alliance formerly the Happiness Initiative organization (happycounts.org)
a number of years ago established a survey (much like the one the King of Bhutan did in
consultation with universities and professionals developed to replace the notion of Gross
Domestic Product with Gross Domestic Happiness) and they have amassed a sample size of
close to 30,000.
Figure 1- www.happycounts.org - Take the survey
To measure overall satisfaction with life, the survey addresses the 10 domains of happiness and
is useful for individuals, communities, organizations and governments. These 10 domains are:
1. Mental Well-Being, 2. Material Well-Being, 3. Work, 4. Time Balance, 5. Community, 6.
Social Support, 7. Health, 8. Governance, 9. Environment, 10. Education, Arts & Culture
I didn’t see the word “heritage” once in there except maybe implied by the domain of
environment or education arts & culture. With a little thought I think we can translate some of
these domains as having a relationship with heritage. I am not suggesting we add another
domain (or maybe I am) but for me the notion of Cultural Heritage equates with IDENTITY and
I KNOW that identifying, protecting, interpreting and celebrating a communities cultural
heritage leads to a more satisfied life as well as the inspiration to “do better” and pride or
Figure 3- U.S. Steel 1880
sometimes shame of the accomplishments of our ancestors. We own them they are part of us.
Even a community newcomer can identify with past newcomers and their accomplishments. I
would be ecstatic if the City of Denver apologized for the Sand Creek Massacre. I believe it
would foster a stronger sense of community if it happened.
How do I KNOW that heritage contributes to a communities’ and an individuals’ “satisfaction
with life”? If we can agree that taking pride in your living space, participating in community
activities, using you talents to add to the quality of life of yourself, your neighbors and your
community, then I believe that these things become a metric by which we can gauge satisfaction
with life. Some examples of work that I have done in over 40 years in Heritage Management
may illustrate this idea.
I&M Canal Corridor
Joliet
One of the best examples comes from Illinois. I was
commissioned to do one of the early feasibility studies for
what was to become the Illinois & Michigan Canal
Heritage Corridor – the first Heritage Corridor in the
nation. The community of Joliet was one of the
communities within the proposed corridor boundaries.
When I first saw Joliet homes needed painting, fences
mending, grass cutting – a general “run down” appearance
(BUT they had just restored the magnificent theater
downtown and were worried how they were going to fill it.). As a part of my involvement with
this project I was asked to facilitate the
Historic Preservation sessions at a two day
conference discussing the adaptive reuse of
the unused U.S. Steel plant in the heart of
Joliet. Tangible resources included the ruins
of two Bessemer furnaces numerous historic
structures and infrastructure for the
manufacture of barbed wire (read how the
west was won) as well as other products
including gas driven off by the Coking
process which lit the gas lights of Chicago
(and left behind Sulfuric Acid).
Figure 2- I&M Canal Gatekeepers House.
Intangible resources include family stories of work at USSteel and life along the I&M Canal. As
the conference ended a community historic preservation group was planned and there was lots of
enthusiasm to “move forward” and “do something” and the general recognition that the people of
Joliet really did have a heritage and many important things had happened there and they were a
part of that history with the opportunity to keep it alive. The proceedings of the conference were
published and distributed to libraries, City departments and others.
When I returned a year later houses were painted, fences mended, lawns mowed, banners
downtown celebrating the I&M canal and people I had met still enthused about the many
possibilities and great future and quality of life was to be had in Joliet.
Figure 4- Celebrating Joliet
Other communities along the corridor including Bridgeport, Lockport and others have accepted
the mantel of full blown National Heritage Corridor communities which have benefited
economically with a future of a great quality of life. Community well-being is on the rise here
and cultural heritage has played an important part.
Micronesia
Figure 5- Micronesia
During the Reagan years under his jobs act I was commissioned to plan and manage to
completion, seven historic preservation projects in Micronesia in what had been the US Trust
Territories of the Pacific. The projects were: 1. the rehabilitation of a traditional men’s house in
the Republic of Balau, 2. Complete the construction of a meeting house and conduct an
archaeological survey of the site in the traditional village of Bechyal in Yap State, Federated
States of Micronesia, 3. Repair, Rehabilitation and archaeology at the World Heritage prehistoric
site of Nan Madol in Pohnpei State, Federated states of Micronesia, 4. Rehabilitation of the ruins
of the historic site of Lelu in Kosrae State, Federated States Of Micronesia, 5. Several
rehabilitation projects in Truk State, Federated States of Micronesia. 6. The rehabilitation of the
deBruhn plantation house in the Republic of the Marshall Islands 7. Restoration of the Puluwat
Light House.
Bai of Arai
All of these projects had both tangible and intangible components and resulted in increasing the
well-being of their communities, but the project in Balau is the most appropriate one for the
purposes of this presentation. Laying just 528 miles southeast of the Philippines, the Republic of
Balau is a collection of islands including Belileau Island the location of an important battle of the
Second World War. Koror (the capital) and Babaldob (the location of Arai State) are the two
largest of the archipelago. Arai State was the location of the Bai of Arai the last traditional
men’s house in the Republic.
Figure 6- The Bai of Airi
The Bai was in desperate need of repair and if lost would constitute great harm to the
communities and culture of the Republic. In Balau all the land is owned by the women and
everything relating to the sea belongs to the men EXCEPT the Bai where they conduct business
and do other things that men do in their own space. The Bai is also the library of the history of
Arai with the stories passed down from village historian to village historian. The paintings
throughout the Bai act as mnemonics or reminders to the historians, community, visitors and
enemies of the history, power and importance of Arai community and its people. Thus the Bai
has both tangible and intangible cultural resources. Without this men’s house the heart goes out
of the community.
To repair the Bai we went to the Council on Aging and located elders who still held the
knowledge relating to thatching, painting, what woods to use for the flooring, the sides and
beams for the roof. Using unemployed young men these elders took them into the forest to find
and acquire the materials necessary to rehabilitate/restore the Bai according to the Secretary of
the Interiors Standards. While the rehab was in progress we went to the other States of Belau
and told them that there were young men who could build Bai’s for their villages. Thus
marketing the skills and experience to the rest of the Republic and helping to restore the hearts of
their communities. Upon completion of the work in Airi we had a graduation ceremony
complete with speakers, the local school chorus and a diploma for each of the young men from
the Government of Balau. In this case the restoration of a key element of the communities’
cultural heritage contributed greatly to the well-being of not only this community but many other
communities as well as the Republic itself.
Figure 9- Graduation Day Figure 10- Diplomas Given
Figure 11- Graduation Party
Bechyal Yap
The people on the islands of Yap (the
island of stone money) were working to
recreate a traditional village for the
education of their children and as a
tourist attraction. They had built a
traditional seagoing outrigger, a
traditional boat house, a men’s house and cleaned the foundation of a prehistoric meeting house
in preparation to reconstruct a new
meeting house. The project then ran
out of money and the government out
of commitment. Along came Reagan’s
Jobs Act.
When I got on site to design and plan
the rebuilding project I met with the
last traditional architect on Yap and the
Yap Historic Preservation Officer.
In order to plan the project to be
acceptable to the National Park Service
we needed to have a qualified “architect of record”. When the project was completed with
considerable help from Japanese archaeologist Michiko Intoh I prepared the final report. On the
cover a picture of John Tamag the architect complete in his loin cloth and container of Betelnut
standing beside a huge piece of stone money.
Figure 14- The Meeting House
Figure 12- The Island of Stone Money
Figure 13- Our Conference Table
Today the people are using the reconstructed
traditional village including the meeting
house to teach traditional dancing, Yapese
history, traditional construction techniques
(including the songs necessary to tie the
joints of buildings in elaborate knots of
coconut fiber rope) and sailing a traditional
outrigger. All the tangible and intangible
things that return a community to its cultural
roots and thus greatly enhance its sustainable community well-being.
Figure 16- Joints are tied with complex Knots, no Nails, no Pegs, Just Knots
Figure 15- Frigate Birds are the Totem of this Village
South Street
As we were in the course of
excavating an 18th century
ship from lower Manhattan,
Mayor Ed Koch invited the
city to come down and see
HIS SHIP. We hastily built
a rather precarious plywood
walkway above the ship and
crossed our fingers that it
would hold for the day (also
hoping OSHA wouldn’t
show up). That morning people were lined up for blocks all excited about THEIR SHIP. As I
walked the line talking to people I asked a construction worker who had taken off work why he
was here. “I’m from Jersey it’s my heritage!!”
Figure 18- Don't Break!
Did this project contribute to community well-being? I think so, It certainly made Mayor Koch
feel good. It made a number of the citizens of NY NJ feel good and added to their IDENTY the
Figure 17- Third Shift
Figure 19- The Bow - The Most Scientifically Interesting Part of the Ship
history of a small piece of lower Manhattan. For my money I believe this early spring morning
near South Street Sea Port contributed to the well-being of a community. Whether it was
sustained or not is doubtful since there was no mention of it after the project was over and what
remains of the ship is now in New Port News VA as no one in New York wanted it not even the
Mayor.
There are many other examples some of which worked, some that didn’t and a few that were
bitterly disappointing.
But times arrow flies.
For close to five decades a profession has evolved that provides services to clients to help them
meet the heritage preservation component of State and Federal law. I have been a part of that
profession for almost that long. The work products consist of technical reports, site discovery
documentation and occasionally something for the public. As chair of the first Public Education
Committee of the Society for American Archaeology I heard endless lamentations about how the
public didn’t care about what we were doing and how the profession was not fulfilling its public
education mandate. The Society cared so much about it that they gave us $50 for postage for the
year. The situation is improving somewhat but not to the point where it has a significant
influence on community well-being. Indeed most sustainability and well-being practitioners
have never heard of Heritage and thus it has been left out of surveys, plans and projects designed
to enhance community well-being. I know, many of you here today will point to projects that
include heritage as a tool for well-being but I submit they are the exception rather than the rule.
We call ourselves Heritage Resource Managers but we know that little that we do in the way of
management has enhanced or helped to create sustainable community well-being. Of all the
tools in our kit the one least used is INTERPRETATION. Despite the fact that the National Park
Service has identified interpretation as an important management tool as well as an enhancement
of the visitor experience. I believe that the interpretation of a communities’ cultural heritage to
the citizens of that community is a keystone to sustainable community well-being. It helps to
establish the communities IDENTITY for its citizens, its neighbors, visitors and the world. It is
This is the foundation upon which
ALL of the other domains of Happiness/well-being can safely rest. It anchors the community
and its citizens to an IDENTITY, to a homeland, to a community of shared experience and
shared responsibility. It is that rootedness that provides the stable platform for confidently
reaching for the future.
To illustrate the importance of IDENTITY I found this caption to a recent photograph:
The destruction of Syria’s cultural heritage must stop. It gravely affects the identity and history
of the Syrian people and all humanity, damaging the foundations of society for many years to
come.
For too long we Heritage Managers have been content to submit our reports, document new sites,
occasionally help communities or community groups in understanding their heritage and then go
on to the next project. I submit, from years of experience, that this does not establish
SUSTAINABLE community well-being. I do believe however that the interpretation of a
communities heritage with a multitude of demonstratively proven techniques can and does help
the community, its children and its children’s children to rediscover its identity every time they
encounter them. And this at least supports a more sustainable community well-being.
Interpretation has had many definitions over the years. The one I find most useful comes from
Interpretation Canada: "Interpretation is a communication process, designed to reveal meanings
and relationships of our cultural and natural heritage, through involvement (my emphasis) with
objects, artifacts, landscapes and sites." Involvement is the key word here. Involvement of the
entire community at all levels and to all ages of the citizens. Involvement in the teaching and
learning of the hidden tangible and intangible histories of their communities as revealed by
heritage practitioners, scholars, knowledgeable citizens, officials, citizens of all ethnicities and
just plain folks. This means that everyone has access to and knowledge of those hidden histories
so they can be celebrated, passed on to younger generations, discussed around dinner tables and
become a critical part of a community’s well-being. The mechanics of doing this will take more
time than this presentation will allow. But I have had the privilege to work on enough projects
so that I know it can be done and how it can be done.
Does Heritage Work as a Tool for Community Well-being? I hope that I have demonstrated that
it does. But the more important question should be - CAN Heritage Work as a Tool for
SUSTAINABLE Community Well-being? I believe the answer is yes but only if the
community is fully knowledgeable and INVOLVED in all aspects with the objects, artifacts,
landscapes, sites, stories, traditions, songs and dances, foods and the many other aspects of a
community’s cultural heritage. Carefully integrated with the 10 domains of happiness.
Sustainable Community Well-being can be achieved, all it takes is becoming resilient and strong
through compassion, connection and commitment.