+ All Categories
Home > Technology > Het Wikipedia Conflict

Het Wikipedia Conflict

Date post: 13-May-2015
Category:
Upload: nnck
View: 545 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
In dit onderzoek wordt het conflict, dat plaatsvindt op Wikipedia, tussen de Wikipediagemeenschap en de troll-gemeenschap uiteengezet. Het open karakter van Wikipedia is de aanleiding voor dit conflict aangezien iedereen kennis kan toevoegen, bewerken, bekritiseren en verwijderen van Wikipedia. De trolls voeren strijd om de doelen en idealen van de Wikipedia-gemeenschap aan te vallen, waarop de Wikipedia-gemeenschap tegenstand biedt door vandalisme op allerlei manieren van Wikipedia te verbannen. Gaandeweg wordt geprobeerd antwoord te geven op de vraag of dit conflict ook gezien kan worden als een vorm van spel.
Popular Tags:
19
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Edited by Annouck Welhuis
Transcript
Page 1: Het Wikipedia Conflict

Welcome to Wikipedia,

the free encyclopedia

that anyone can edit.

Edited by Annouck Welhuis

Page 2: Het Wikipedia Conflict

SHORT BACKGROUND

- January 2001- Larry Sanger & Jimmy Wales- Non-profit- Dutch community

Page 3: Het Wikipedia Conflict

FIRST RULE - October 2001

- ‘Ignore all rules’- If a rule prevents you from improving or

maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it.

Page 4: Het Wikipedia Conflict

RESEARCH QUESTION

- How can the conflict between the Wikipedia community and the Wikipedia vandals be considered as a game?

Page 5: Het Wikipedia Conflict

CONFLICT

Page 6: Het Wikipedia Conflict

VANDALS / TROLLS

- Encyclopædia Dramatica- Slogan: “In lulz we trust”- Satirical - Internet subculture

- Intentionally ignoring all rules

Page 7: Het Wikipedia Conflict
Page 8: Het Wikipedia Conflict

WIKIPEDIA AS A GAME

1. You make edits to articles

2. Your edits get reverted by aspie fucktards

3. You revert them back and they in turn revert again

4. You bicker on the talk page of the article

5. You whine about the aspies on the administrator noticeboards accusing them of being uncivil, they in turn accuse you of assuming bad faith

6. You open a Request for Comment on their behavior

7. You take them to arbitration

8. ???

9. Jimbo profits

Gaining Experience Points• 1 vandal reversion = 1 exp (a vandal is defined as an editor with a different point of view than yours)• 1 legitimate edit to a page = 2 exp• 1 article created (assuming it stays) = 20 exp• 1 Good Article = 100 exp• 1 Featured Article = 200 exp• 1 report to AIV or UAA = 5 exp• 1 page deleted via AfD = 20 exp• 1 page deleted via PROD or CSD = 10exp• 1 support for an Rfa = 20 exp• 1 article with POV or misinformation inserted into = 100 exp

•1 user blocked as a result of drama created = 50 exp

Page 9: Het Wikipedia Conflict

BOTS

- Non-human actor- Cluebot - Task: reverting vandalism

Page 10: Het Wikipedia Conflict
Page 11: Het Wikipedia Conflict
Page 12: Het Wikipedia Conflict
Page 13: Het Wikipedia Conflict
Page 14: Het Wikipedia Conflict
Page 15: Het Wikipedia Conflict

VANDAL BOTS?

Page 16: Het Wikipedia Conflict

FAMOUS VANDAL

- Willy on Wheels

Page 17: Het Wikipedia Conflict

HOAX

- Bobby Boulders - International Society of Vandal

- “Willy is a fiction propagated by the Admins of Wikipedia. His purpose is to serve as a catch-all persona for all Wikipedia vandals”

(Boulders, 2006).

Page 18: Het Wikipedia Conflict

USER:MYVERYOWNSOCK/VANDALBOT

- Vandalbot:

Page move & edit bot

- Bot policy - Protected articles

Page 19: Het Wikipedia Conflict

SHORT CONCLUSION

1. Not the same game

2. Not the same goal

3. Not the same rules

4. Not the same tools

5. Not the same power

But play in the same Wikipedia ‘World’


Recommended